throbber
VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`Philips Journal of Research
`
`Philips .Journal of Research, published by the Philips Research Laboratories,
`Eindhoven, The Netherlands, is a bimonthly publication containing papers on
`research carried out in the various Philips laboratories. Volumes 1 to 32 have
`appeared under the name of Philips Research Reports.
`
`Annual subscription price for Volume 36 is Dfl. 70, payable in advance.
`Payments should be made only after receipt of an invoice. Correspondence
`should be addressed to: Philips Journal of Research, Philips Research
`Laboratories, Building WBp, Room No. 42, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
`
`Editor-in-chief: J. de Groot
`
`Cover design based on a visual representation of the sound-wave associated with the spoken
`word "Philips".
`
`© N.Y . Philips' Gloeilampenfabrieken, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1981. Articles or illustra(cid:173)
`tions reproduced in whole or in part must be accompanied by a full acknowledgement of the
`source: Philips Journal of Research.
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`Philips J. Res. 36, 15-30, 1981
`
`R 1031
`
`COLOURSHIFT OF THE Ce3+ EMISSION IN
`MONOCRYSTALLINE EPITAXIALLY GROWN
`GARNET LAYERS
`
`by J. M. ~OBERTSON, M. W. VANTOL, W. H." SMITS
`and J . P . H. HEYNEN
`
`Abslracl
`Starting with Ce-doped Y3AI 50 12 grown by liquid-phase epitaxy, the colour
`of the cerium emission was shifted by making various substitutions in the
`garnet lattice. The substitutions were made with the purpose of changing
`the crystal field acting on the Ce3+ ion in the garnet lattice . The light
`outputs and the colour points of the resulting phos phors have been
`measured and the influence of filtering away part of the emission has been
`calculated. It proves to be possible to obtain green and red phosphors
`with compatible light output and the right colour points for colour
`TV purposes.
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Recently it has been demonstrated that liquid-phase epitaxy (LPE) could be
`used to grow monocrystalline layers of garnets which could be used as screens
`2
`3
`in cathode ray tubes 1
`). In this manner it is possible to make miniature
`'
`'
`display tubes in which high excitation densities can be used (ca. 10 W / cm2
`)
`without thermal quenching or "burning in" of the phosphor layer. The
`epitaxially grown Ce3+: Y3Al50 12 (Y AG) gives a cathode ray efficiency of
`) and has a high quenching temperature (310 oq, however it has a
`ca. 50Jo 3
`broad band emission with maximum intensity at ca. 555 nm resulting in a
`colour which is too yellow to be use_d as a green component in a colour TV
`) it is known that the emission band of the Ce3+:
`system. From the literature 4
`Y AG can be shifted towards shorter wavelengths by substituting other ions
`into the garnet structure. In the present paper we shall show that it is possible
`to shift the Ce3+ emission in LPE grown YAG so that it has the desired colour
`coordinates for a green TV tube. We also investigated the possibility of
`making shifts in the emission so that blue and red tubes could be made by
`similar use of molecular engineering.
`
`2. General method
`
`The luminescent properties of Ce3+ doped phosphors have been studied in
`detail in ref. 5. In the ground state the Ce3+ ion has one electron in the 4f state.
`
`Philips Journnl of Rcsenrch Vol. 36 No . I 1981
`
`15
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`J. M. Robertson, M. W van To!, W H. Smits and J.P. H. Heynen
`
`The ground state is split up in a doublet eF7 ; 2 and 2F5 ; 2) with an energy dif(cid:173)
`ference of about 2200 cm-1. At low temperatures this doublet results in two
`peaks in the emission band 6
`); at room temperature it is one of the main causes
`of the width (at half maximum) of about 105 nm of the emission band. In the
`·first excited state the electron occupies a 5d state. The interaction between the
`. wave function of the electron in the 5d state and the crystal field results in a
`broadening of this state and in a splitting into five energy levels. The emission
`of the UV- or cathode ray excited Ce3+ ion is due to the transfer of an electron
`from the lowest 5d level to the 2F ground state; transitions from higher 5d
`states have a relatively low probability at room temperature owing to the
`strong interaction between the 5d states. A change in crystal field will give a
`larger or smaller splitting of the 5d state, which results in a shift of the
`emission spectrum to longer or shorter wavelengths. In most crystal structures
`the crystal field splitting is small and the Ce3+ ion shows an emission in the
`blue or UV, but as a consequence of the extraordinary large crystal field
`splitting in YAG, the Ce3+ ion emits in the green-yellow in this host lattice with
`a maximum intensity at 555 nm .
`) showed that if Lu3+ was substituted for Y3+
`Holloway and Kestigian 6
`in YAG powders, the emission of the Ce3+ ion shifts to shorter wave(cid:173)
`) substituted Gd3+ or La3+ for Y3+ and shifted the
`lengths. Other workers 7
`emission to longer wavelengths, while the substitution of Ga3+, ln3+ or Sc3+
`for Al3+ on an octahedral site shifted the Ce3+ emission to shorter wave(cid:173)
`lengths 6
`7
`).
`'
`'
`These results form the basis for the empirical rule, used in the present work:
`increasing the diameter of the ion on the dodecahedral (Y3+) site increases the ,
`crystal field splitting, while an increasing diameter on the octahedral (Al3+)
`site has the reverse effect. In this study double substitutions on both the
`dodecahedral and octahedral sites were investigated, as well as the substitu(cid:173)
`tion of a smaller ion on the tetrahedral (Al3+) site.
`
`'
`
`9
`
`9
`
`8
`
`'
`
`3. Experimental techniques
`
`The liquid-phase epitaxial growth technique, the cathodoluminescence
`efficiency measurement in a demountable cathode-ray system and the
`measurement of the spectra have been described in detail elsewhere 3). The
`substrates on which the epitaxy was performed were Y3Al50 12 (12.001 A),
`Y3Gas012 (12.280 A) and Y3Al3.5Ga1.50 12 (12.119 A) 10), usually 25 mm in
`diameter, 700 J..Ull thick and cut and polished in [111] orientation.
`The chemical analysis of the layers was performed with the help of an
`electron beam microprobe, calibrated against a set of carefully seiected
`standards.
`
`16
`
`Philips Journal of Research Vol. 36 No. 1 1981
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`Colourshift of the Ce 3+ emission
`
`4. Results and discussion
`
`4.a. Green sh_ijt
`In order to have the right hue for the green component the emission must
`be shifted 'to the. short wavelength side of the spectrum, which means that Lu
`and/or Ga must be substituted. If such a phosphor is to be grown epitaxially
`on a commercially available substrate (such as YAG), this substitution must
`result in a lattice parameter which differs less than 0.018 A from that of the
`substrate. This can be ensured by a simultaneous substitution of Lu3+ for ya+
`and Ga3+ for Al3+ in the correct ratio. Since the lattice parameters of YAG,
`LuAG and YGG are 12.001, 11.908 and 12.280 A respectively, a simultaneous
`substitution of Lu and Ga gives
`d (Ya-yLUyAls-xGax0t2) = 12.001 - 0.031 y + 0.056 X.
`For no lattice mismatch between film and substrate (YAG), i.e. for good
`epitaxy, Lu3+ and Ga3+ must build in a ratio of 9: 5.
`The first experiment was set up to check this ratio and to establish whether
`the shift in the Ce emission is a linear function of the Lu and Ga substitutions
`and to investigate whether the effects of the substitutions are independent
`or not.
`We started with a melt composition
`PbO: B20a: Y20a : Al20a: Ce02 = 450 .0 : 11.65: 2.57 : 5.87:0.5 (g)
`and a growth temperature of ca. 1030 °C. Lutetium oxide and Ga20 3 were
`added in consecutive steps so that the lattice parameter of the film was almost
`constant. Table I shows the results of light output (L), colour point and chem(cid:173)
`ical analysis of the layers. The emission spectrum of sample 8 (doped with the
`
`100
`
`~
`'5
`.&
`
`" 0 :c
`
`3' 50
`
`650
`>-..inm)
`-
`Fig. I. Emission spectra of Ce3+:Y3 AI5 0 12 and Ce3+:Y3 Al5 0 12 + Lu + Ga (sample 8 in table 1).
`
`500
`
`550
`
`600
`
`700
`
`l'hlllpsJournol of Rescnrch Vol . 36 No. I
`
`!981
`
`17
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`J. M. Robertson, M . W van Tal, W H. Smits and J. P. H. Heynen
`
`TABLE I
`Results of adding Lu20 3 and Ga20 3 to a Ce3+:Y3Al5 012 melt
`
`total added
`
`sample
`
`Ga20a Lu20 3
`(g)
`(g)
`
`L
`(J.!W/ sr)
`
`A max
`(nm)
`
`colour
`X
`
`point
`y
`
`Leq
`(lm/ W)
`
`Ce3+:YaAls 012
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`
`0.9
`1.9
`2.9
`2.9
`4.9
`4.9
`4.9
`5.9
`
`1.03
`1.03
`1.03
`1.53
`1.53
`2.03
`2.53
`2.53
`
`185
`141
`171
`166
`162
`156
`153
`143
`115
`
`555
`551
`550
`5.47
`546
`543
`542
`539
`538
`
`0.414
`0.394
`0.387
`0.387
`0.377
`0.365
`0.361
`0.350
`0.349
`
`0.552
`0.557
`0.558
`0.559
`0.561
`0.558
`0.558
`0.558
`0.557
`
`466
`466
`465
`467
`469
`458
`460
`457
`457
`
`Formula of the layers after analysis
`
`sample
`
`Ce
`
`y
`
`Lu
`
`AI
`
`Ga
`
`0
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`
`0.039
`0.008
`0.008
`0.008
`0.007
`0.007
`0.009
`0.008
`
`2.410
`2.432
`2.422
`2.203
`2.209
`2.084
`1.887
`1.903
`
`0.546
`0.569
`0.563
`0.783
`0.777
`0.910
`1.103
`1.080
`
`4.734
`4.787
`4.681
`4.671
`4.460
`4.442
`4.426
`4.339
`
`0.189
`0.203
`0.325
`0.333
`0.545
`0.555
`0.573
`0.668
`
`12.0
`12.0
`12.0
`12.0
`12.0
`12.0
`12.0
`12.0
`
`highest quantity of Lu and Ga) is compared with that of Ce3+ in pure YAG in
`fig. 1. It is clear that the emission (Amax) shifts from 555 nm to 538 nm.
`The samples 3, 5, 6 and 8 were grown with exactly zero mismatch and have
`a ratio between Lu and Ga of about 8 : 5 which is very near to the calculated
`value of 9 : 5. It is also seen that the light output decreases from about
`185 J.!W/ sr for Ce3+:YAG .to 115 J.!W/ sr for sample 8. This is in agreement
`with previous work in which the gallium garnets were found to be less effi-
`
`18
`
`Philips Journal or Research Vol. 36 No. I 1981
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`Co/ourshift of the Ce 3+ emission
`
`555 ~------:;::::t? Lu2 03 - additiOn
`)..""''
`
`{nm) I 550
`
`545
`
`540
`
`535
`0~~0~.1--702~~0~.3~0~4--705~7o6~~Q~.7~
`!Ga2D3/
`
`Fig. 2. The shift of Am ax o f the Ce3+ emission as a function of the mole fraction of Ga 20 3
`in the melt.
`
`cient host lattices under cathode-ray excitation than the aluminium garnets 3
`).
`In figure 2 the maxima of the Ce3+ emission spectra are plotted as a function
`of the mole fraction of Ga 2 0 3 in the melt. It is clear that the addition of Ga
`gives a linear shift of Amax to shorter wavelengths. Between certain samples
`only Lu 20 3 was added and this results in a vertical translation in the graph .
`From this graph it follows that there is a 30 nm shift per mole fraction
`of Ga20 3 in the melt. Chemical analysis of the layers gives the shift per mole
`fraction of Ga 20 3 in the layer which amounts to 14 nm per substituted
`Ga atom. This results corresponds exactly with a Amax at 541 nm for
`Ce3+:Y3Ga 1Al 40 12 given in ref. 9. A comparison between the mole fraction
`) gives an
`of Ga20 3 in the melt and the relative concentration in the layer 11
`increasing segregation coefficient for Ga3+ of 0.27 to 0.38 with increasing
`Ga concentration.
`The same experimental results can be plotted as a function of the mole
`fraction of Lu 20 3 in the melt (fig. 3). This time the vertical shifts are due to
`addition of Ga 2 0 3 to the melt. The shift in Amax is 13 nm per mole fraction of
`Lu20 3 • The shift per substituted ion in the layer follows again from chemical
`analysis. It amounts to 10 nm per Lu ion, which is only half the value reported
`in ref. 6 for Lu substitution in YAG. This indicates that the shifts due to Lu3+
`and Ga3+ are not completely independent and the shift in emission due to the
`Lu3+ is larger in pure YAG than in gallium substituted YAG . The segregation
`coefficient of 1.03 agrees very well with the results obtained for Lu in
`iron garnets .
`In figure 4 the colour points of the samples are given in a chromaticity
`diagram. The dotted curve in this figure represents the locus of colour points
`
`Philips Journal of Resenrch Vol. 36 No. 1 1981
`
`19
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`J. M. Robertson, M . W. van Tot, W. H. Smits and J. P. H . Heynen
`
`&--- ---:::;::::::;:::;i;ll, Ga203 - add ilion
`555
`Amox
`-
`lnm)
`550
`
`• I
`~
`~
`t
`
`545
`
`540
`
`I
`
`535
`0~~0~1 --~02---0~.3---0~. 4---0~5--~0-6 --0~. -7 -
`f Lu201)
`
`Fig . 3. The shift of Amax of the Ce3• emission as a function of the mole fraction of Lu20 3 in
`the melt.
`
`070
`
`y
`
`550nm
`
`1 Ama, = 555nm
`2 Am0,= 549nm
`3 Am0,= 538nm
`
`035
`
`- - X
`
`0 40
`
`Fig. 4. Colour shift of Ce:YAG with Lu and Ga substitutions;---- calculated shift, o-o-o
`measured shift, ---- after filtering away the red part of the Ce emission .
`
`calculated as if the emission spectrum of Ce3+ in YAG was shifted with respect
`to the abcissa in energy units, i.e. as if the crystal field splitting of the Sd state
`is changed while its width is kept constant.
`Since the desired colour point x = 0.29, y = 0.60 cannot be obtained by
`shifting Amax alone, the red part of the emission must be filtered out.
`The effect of an ideal filter, ·i.e. a filter that transmits all radiation with a
`wavelength below a certain cut-off value and blocks all radiation above that
`
`20
`
`Philips Jou rnal of Research Vol. 36 No . I 1981
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`Colow·shift of the Ce 3+ emission
`
`value, is represented by the dash-dotted curves. Obviously the remaining
`emission has a-lower radiant intensity and a higher luminous equivalent than
`the original unfiltered radiation.
`The luminous intensity, obtained by multiplying the radiant intensity and
`the luminous equivalent, decreases only slightly because the blocked (red)
`radiation has a low lumen content.
`The colour points on the drawn line have the same hue as the desired colour
`but a different colour saturation; according to this figure, i.e. assuming
`constant energy efficiency of the phosphors, minimum filtering and just
`acceptable colour saturation is obtained with an original spectrum with Amax at
`538 nm . However, since the energy efficiency decreases with increasing Ga
`concentration (table I), the maximum luminous intensity is obtained for a
`phosphor with Amax = 549 nm, resulting in a colour which is slightly more
`saturated than necessary. The . corresponding ideal filter should block all
`radiation above 582 nm, which results in 65 mlm/ sr at 0.1 W cathode-ray
`excitation (5.50/o energy efficiency).
`
`4.b. Blue shift
`It was tried to find out how far the Ce3+ emission could be pushed to shorter
`wavelengths in the garnet host-lattice in order to make a blue tube. We started
`with Ce3+:Lu 3Al 50 12 grown onto YAG and not Ce3+:Lu 3Ga50 12 since the
`gallium garnets are known to be inefficient host lattices for cathode lumi(cid:173)
`) . In the Ce3+: Lu 3Al50 12 some of the Al3+ ions on the octahedral
`nescence 3
`site were substituted by the large ions Ga3+, In3+ or Sc3+. Since no substrates
`were available to match the small lattice parameters of these films we used
`YAG as the substrate. This means that cracked layers were produced and the
`measured light output was enhanced by multiple internal reflections and scat(cid:173)
`tering. Thus the values given in the table are only a qualitative indication of
`the efficiency of the layers.
`Starting with a melt composition of
`
`PbO: Bz0 3 : Lu 20 3 : Al 20 3 : Ce0 2 = 450.0 : 11.65:3.09:3 .91:0.5 (g)
`
`and a growth temperature of 1050 ~C Ga 20 3 and In 20 3 were added to the
`melt. Table II gives a summary of the results . In pure Ce3+: Lu 3Al50 12 the
`emission has a Amax of 529 nm in agreement with ref. 4. The Ga 2 0 3 shifted
`this Amax to 519 nm (sample 8 with 8.1 (g) Ga 20 3 added) . At this point a
`second emission band at 405 nm appears. Addition of 1.5 g In20 3 gives a
`further shift to 513 nm and a higher intensity of emission at 405 nm.
`The emission spectra of the samples 8 and 11, i.e. those with maximum Ga
`and In content, are presented in fig. 5 and compared with emission of Ce3+
`
`Philips Journal or Research Vol. 36 No. I 1981
`
`21
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`J. M. Robertson, M. W. van To!, W. H. Smits and J. P. H. Heynen
`
`TABLE II
`Results for Ga and In substituted Ce 3+: Lu 3 Al5 0 12 films
`
`total added
`
`sample Ga20a
`(g)
`
`In20 3
`(g)
`
`L
`(J..t.W/sr)
`
`A max
`(nm)
`
`colour
`X
`
`point
`y
`
`Leq
`(lm/W)
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`
`3.6
`3.6
`4.1
`5.1
`7.1
`7.1
`8.1
`8.1
`8.1
`8.1
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`0.5
`1.0
`1.5
`
`-
`-
`-
`157
`175
`79*
`168
`45
`29
`22
`
`527
`524
`524
`523
`522
`521
`519+405
`519+405
`517 +405
`513 +405
`
`0.295
`0.288
`0.286
`0.278
`0.269
`0.266
`0.263
`0.255
`0.247
`0.239
`
`0.536
`0.533
`0.529
`0.529
`0.512
`0.500
`0.495
`0.472
`0.434
`0.395
`
`427
`420
`418
`421
`402
`396
`387
`362
`323
`286
`
`* broken sample
`
`Formula after analysis
`
`sample
`
`Ce
`
`Lu
`
`AI
`
`Ga
`
`In
`
`0
`
`3
`5
`8
`11
`
`0.007
`0.008
`0.005
`0.006
`
`2.995
`3.001
`3.030
`2.967
`
`4.463
`4.302
`3.963
`3.972
`
`0.533
`0.687
`0.999
`1.025
`
`0.0
`0.0
`0.0
`0.029
`
`12.0
`12.0
`12.0
`12.0
`
`in pure YAG. The samples with intermediate In content show intermediate
`shifts of the main band and intermediate intensities of the 405 nm peak. The
`latter peak does not shift as a function of Ga or In concentration; therefore we
`suppose that this emission does not originate in the Ce3+ ion.
`The values of Amax of the Ce3+ emission are plotted as a function of the
`mole fraction of Ga20 3 in the melt in fig. 6. The addition of Ga 20 3 to the
`Ce3+: Lu 3Al 50 12 melt gives a linear shift of Amax to shorter wavelengths of
`145 nm per mole fraction Ga 20 3 • This shift is again about half the shift caused
`by Ga substitution in Y3Al 50 12 which again stresses the point that the shifts
`
`22
`
`Philips Journal of Research Vol. 36 No.1 1981
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`Co/ow·shift of the Ce 3+ emission
`
`Fig. 5. The emission spectra of Ce3+: YAG, Ce3t Lu 3AI 50 12 + Ga and Ce3+: Lu 3(AIGa) 50 12 + ln .
`
`-
`
`>-tnm!
`
`530
`
`Am ox
`{nm)
`
`5 15
`
`0
`
`0.1 02 03
`
`0.4
`
`0.6
`05
`[GalOJ}
`
`0.7
`
`Fig. 6. Shift of Amax of the Ce3+ emission as a function of the mole fraction of Ga 20 3 in the
`Ce: Lu 3Al60 12 melt.
`
`due to addition of lutetium and gallium are not independent and that the
`crystal field splitting shows a more complex behaviour than expected. The
`segregation coefficient of Ga3+ is the same as before, changing from 0.33 to
`0.38 with increasing Ga concentrations.
`In order to measure the influence of indium separately, indium was added
`to a gallium-free lutetium aluminium garnet melt with composition
`PbO: B20 3 : Lu20 3 : Al20 3 : Ce02 = 450 .0: 11.65: 3.09: 6.00: 0 .5 (g)
`The results are given in table III. In contradistinction to the Ga3+ substitution
`the ln3+ substitution hardly influences the shift of the main Ce3+ peak. Micro(cid:173)
`probe analysis showed that at the highest ln 20 3 concentration 1.50Jo of the
`Lu 3+ ions are ~ubstituted by ln3+ while the Al3+ concentration is not affected
`
`l'hllips Journol of Reseo rch Vol. 36 No . 1 1981
`
`23
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`J. M. Robertson, M. W van To!, W H. Smits and J. P. H. Heynen
`
`TABLE III
`Results for In substituted Ce3+: Lu3Al5 0 12 films
`
`sample
`
`In203
`(g) .
`
`L
`(J..LW/sr)
`
`A max
`(nm)
`
`2
`3
`4
`6
`
`0.5
`1
`2
`2.5
`
`57.5
`35
`17.5
`12
`
`533
`532+405
`531 + 405
`532+405
`
`colour
`X
`
`0.324
`0.316
`0.310
`0.305
`
`point
`y
`
`0.550
`0.541
`0.517
`0.493
`
`Leq
`(lm/W)
`
`441
`427
`359
`374
`
`so that the In builds into the dodecahedral sites instead of the octahedral sites
`in the garnet.
`With Sc20 3 substitution a similar thing happens. Analysis shows that 40%
`of Sc3+ replaces Lu 3+ on the dodecahedral sites and 60% replaces Al3+ on the
`octahedral sites. The substitution has little effect on the shift of the Ce3+ emis(cid:173)
`sion. This suggests that either the effects of Sc3+ substitution on both sites can(cid:173)
`cel each other or it is not the diameter of the substituting ion which influences
`the crystal field, but some other property such as its polarizability 12•13).
`The colours of the emission by Ga, In and Sc substituted garnets are
`presented in the chromaticity diagram of fig. 7. Owing to the presence of the
`peak at 405 nm, the colour points of the In and Sc containing samples deviate
`
`0.9
`
`y
`
`0 6
`
`0. 5
`
`0.1
`
`Ce: )]AlsO,;
`
`green

`,.~--:l
`, .
`,/1l2
`I
`,
`'
`I
`I J
`' ' ' I
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`
`0o~~~~~~-70.~4 ~0~5~70.6~~0~7~
`---- x
`Fig. 7. The colour shift of Ce3+: Lu 3Al 50 12 due to GaJ+ and ln3+ substitutions; x--- x
`Ce : Y3Al 50 12 + Lu,Ga, o---o Ce:Lu 3Al 50 12 + Ga, o---o Ce:Lu 3(AIGa).O, +In,
`o-'-o Ce :Lu 3Al 50 12 +In and o....!...o Ce:Lu 3 Al 50 12 + Sc.
`
`24
`
`Philips Journal or Research Vol. 36 No. 1 1981
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`Colow'Shijt of the Ce 3+ emission
`
`from the dashed line, which again represents the " theoretically shifted "
`YAG:Ce emission.
`Another point to notice is that ln3+ and Sc3+ have a very strong negative
`influence on the cathode-ray efficiency even stronger than gallium.
`
`4.c. Red shift
`The motive for producing a cerium doped red phosphor is to circumvent
`the problem of saturation of the relatively slow Eu 3+ -doped phosphors at
`high energy densities 14
`). It seems possible to produce a red shift in the
`ces+: Y3Al50 12 emission by reversed substitutions compared to those which
`produced the blue/ green shift, namely, a larger ion on the dodecahedral si"te
`and/or a smaller ion on the octahedral site in the garnet lattice.
`We again started with Ce : YAG and substituted Gd3+ for Y3+. This produced
`a rapid increase in lattice parameter of the films and resulted again in facetted
`growth so that the light output is only a qualitative measure for the efficiency .
`It was impossible to double-substitute with a small trivalent ion on the tetrahedral
`or octahedral sites in this case in order to maintain a constant lattice parameter.
`In table IV the results are summarized for a Ce3+: Y3Al 50 12 melt to which
`Gd 20 3 had been added in small steps . The starting melt composition was
`PbO: B20 a : Y20a : Al20a: Ce02 = 450.0 : 11.65 : 3.80 : 6.52 : 0.5 (g).
`
`For 6 g Gd 20 3 added to the melt (sample 24) the shift of Amax was from 555 nm
`to 574 nm. In fig. 8 the Amax are plotted as a function of the mole fraction of
`
`580
`
`A max
`(nm) 575
`
`570
`
`560
`
`550
`
`0
`
`0.1
`
`0.6
`0.5
`(Gd203}
`[Gd20Jl +!Y;;OJ)
`~ig. 8. The shift of Amax .of the Ce3+ emission as a function of the mole fraction of Gd 20 3
`m the melt.
`
`0.2
`
`0.3
`
`0.4
`
`0.7
`
`Philips Journal of Research Vol. 36 No . 1 1981
`
`25
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`J. M. Robertson, M. W. van To/, W. H. Smits and J. P. H. Heynen
`
`TABLE IV
`Results for Gd substituted Ce 3+: Y3Al 50 12 melt
`
`. total added
`
`sample Gd20a Al203
`(g)
`(g)
`
`L
`(J..LW/ sr)
`
`A max
`(nm)
`
`colour
`X
`
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`0
`0.25
`0.5
`1
`1.5
`2
`3
`4
`4
`6
`
`6.52
`6.52
`6.52
`6.52
`6.52
`6.52
`6.52
`7.52
`8.52
`8.52
`
`139
`117
`144
`177
`179
`177
`213
`167
`172
`158
`
`555
`552
`554
`558
`560
`564
`567
`569
`573
`574
`
`0.418
`0.412
`0.420
`0.427
`0.438
`0.446
`0.453
`0.462
`0.469
`0.474
`
`point
`y
`
`0.545
`0.547
`0.544
`0.539
`0.534
`0.530
`0.525
`0.519
`0.514
`0.511
`
`Leq
`(lm/ W)
`
`454
`450
`446
`436
`436
`429
`418
`411
`405
`400
`
`Formula after analysis
`
`sample
`
`Ce
`
`18
`21
`24
`
`0.009
`0.007
`0.010
`
`y
`
`2.589
`2.025
`1.587
`
`Gd
`
`0.403
`1.002
`1.395
`
`AI
`
`4.997
`4.964
`5.006
`
`0
`
`12.0
`12.0
`12.0
`
`Gd 20 3 in the melt. It is clear that Amax shifts linearly to longer wavelengths
`with 54 nm per mole fraction of Gd 20 3 in the melt. These Amax shifts are in
`perfect agreement with a Amax of 575 nm for Ce3+: Gd1.5 Y~.5Al5 012 as
`mentioned by Blasse and Bril for powders 9) • . In this case the segregation
`coefficient of Gd is 0.94 which agrees very well with the value obtained with
`iron garnets.
`In fig. 9 the colour points of this gadolinium substituted series of layers are
`plotted in a chromaticity diagram. The colour shift follows a path parallel to
`the "theoretically shifted" emission spectrum of Ce3+: Y3Al 50 12 .
`A new melt was made from which pure Ce3+: Gd3Al 50 12 films could be
`grown onto Y3Ga1.5Al1.50 12 substrates. The Ama£ of the Ce3+ emission was
`
`26
`
`Philips Journal of Research Vol. 36 No. 1 1981
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`Colourshift of the Ce3+ emission
`
`- 0.60
`
`y
`
`I ass
`
`oso
`
`OL.S
`
`Ce)3At501;
`
`S70nm
`
`-~----,
`
`',, 580nm
`Cec Gd3At50 12 o , ,
`' ',
`
`040
`
`0.45
`
`oso
`----. X
`
`o.ss
`
`Fig. 9. Colour shift of Ce.: YAG to the red; - - -- calculated shift, •-• Ce : YaAlsO,. -: Oct,
`x-x Ce:Y3Al 50 12 + Mg,S1, 0 Ce :Gd3Al 50 12 O.max = 587 nm) and D Ce:Gd 3(AI,Mg)2(Al,Si),O,.
`O·m•x = 614 nm).
`
`100
`
`~ .....
`::J
`.8-
`::J
`0
`.,...
`-C
`;g> 50
`
`Ce · Gd3Ais 0;2
`
`-
`
`>...inm)
`
`Fig. 10. The emission spectra of Ce3+ in Y3Al 50 12 , (Y,Gd) 3AI 50 12 and Gd 3Al 50 12 •
`
`found to be 587 nm which is equal to the value published by Benderskii eta!. 8).
`The light output of these phosphor layers was 182 J.LW/ sr, but the layers were still
`facetted owing to the difference in lattice parameters of the film and substrate.
`In fig. 10 the Ce3+ emission is shown in YAG, YAG + Gd and in Gd 3Al 50 12 •
`Another large ion that might enter dodecahedral sites in the garnets is La3+.
`This was also tried, but it was found to have a limited effect on the Ce3+ emis(cid:173)
`sion in the YAG and GdAG layers .
`
`Philips Journal of Research Vol. 36 No. I 1981
`
`27
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`J. M. Robertson, M. W. van To/, W. H. Smits and J. P. H. Heynen
`
`According to the empirical substitution rule a shift of the Ce3+ emission to
`longer wavelengths might aJso be achieved by the substitution of a smaller ion
`than Al3+ in the tetrahedral site. Since no trivalent ion is available we tried to
`simultaneously substitute Mg2+ on an octahedral site and Si4+ on a tetrahedral
`site. In this way the ionic radius of the tetrahedral site ion decreases . Addition
`of 2. 75 g Si0 2 and 1 g MgO to the standard Ce3+: YAG melt shifts the
`maximum of the Ce3+ emission from 555 nm to 579 nm resulting in a colour
`point of x = 0.468, y = 0.500.
`The addition of Mg and Si to the Ce3+: Gd 3Ga5 0 12 melt gives a similar shift
`in emission of 587 nm to 614 nm. The emission spectra are plotted in fig. 11.
`The broadening of the emission spectra is more than can be explained by equal
`energy dispersion and is probably due to inhomogeneities in the distribution
`of substituted ions on a microscopic scale.
`Unfortunately, the cathodoluminescence efficiency drops dramatically after
`addition of even small amounts of MgO and Si0 2 to either melt. The sharp
`decrease in light output was accompanied by the appearance of a second
`(solid) phase in the melt consisting of small crystals with a cube growth
`habit. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that these crystals were of the type
`RE 2Al 40 9 (refs 15 and 16), while analysis by the electron beam microprobe
`indicated that the cerium is highly concentrated in these crystals and the con(cid:173)
`centration in the layers was almost zero. As a result, the low efficiency seems
`to be caused by a lack of cerium activator ions in the epitaxial layer. Another
`combination of substitutions, CaO + Si0 2 , to the melt showed a similar
`decrease in efficiency as well as the appearance of some "cubic-like" crystals.
`Since it appears not to be simple to shift the Ce3+ emission to the red and
`maintain a reasonable output it is again of interest to calculate the luminous
`100
`
`500
`
`550
`
`600
`
`650
`
`>-lnm)
`-
`Fig. II. The effect on the Ce3+ eniission when Mg2+ and Si<+ are substituted into Y3AI 50 12 and
`Gd 3AI50 12 •
`
`28
`
`Philips Journal of Research Vol. 36 No. I 1981
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`Colourshift of the Ce 3+ emission
`
`intensities using "ideal" filters to obtain the desired chromaticity for the red
`component of a colour display. If this is done in the same way as for the green
`component, it turns out that Ce3+: Gd 3Al50 12
`is a good choice with a
`luminous intensity of 22 Lm/sr at 0.1 W cathode-ray excitation, if the light
`output efficiency of the phosphor is equal to that of Ce: YAG (ca. 185 ~J.W/sr).
`This intensity is only 200Jo lower than the ideal combination of filter and shift,
`and is compatible with 68 mlm/sr obtained from the green tube at the same
`excitation.
`
`s. Conclusions
`The results of our studies show that the model of crystal field splitting of the
`5d level of the Ce3+ ion is valid for the epitaxially grown garnets and that it can
`be used to shift the emission over a broad part of the spectrum by adequate
`substitutions. The garnet lattice is not ideal for a blue Ce3+ phosphor since the
`natural large crystal field has to be artificially decreased to a large extent.
`However, there are plenty of other host lattices giving good Ce3+ blue
`phosphors such as Y2Si05.
`It is not only the size of the ionic radius of the substituting ion on the
`octahedral site, but also some other property that causes the shift to shorter
`wavelengths. Additions of large ions such as Ga3+, and especially ln3+ and Sc3+
`have a drastic effect on the cathodoluminescent efficiency of these phosphor
`layers.
`Additions of double substitutions such as Mg2+ + Si4+ causes a shift to the
`red but it appears to be very difficult to incorporate enough Ce3+ in the Mg: Si(cid:173)
`substituted layers to maintain a high cathode-ray efficiency. This is caused by
`the formation of a second phase in the melt.
`Using the molecular engineering described above, it is possible to make a
`green and a red phosphor that are compatible in light output and useful for
`colour television displays if the colour point is corrected by some additional
`filtering.
`
`6. Acknowledgement
`
`P . A. Paans and M. Klerk 'are thanked for their work with the electron
`microprobe and J. Daams is thanked for his X-ray analysis of the crystals.
`
`Philips Research Laboratories
`
`Eindhoven, September 1980
`
`l'hillpsJournul of Research Vol. 36 No.1 1981
`
`29
`
`VIZIO 1018
`
`

`
`J. M. Robertson, M. W van Tot, W H. Smits and J. P. H. Heynen
`
`REFERENCES
`1) J. M. Robertson and M. W. van Tol, Epitaxially grown monocrystalline garnet cathode
`ray-tube phosphor screens, Appl. Phys. Letts. 37 (5), 471, 1980.
`2) M. W. van Toland J . van Esdonk, A high luminescence, high resolution cathode ray tube
`for special purposes; IEEE Trans. ED to be published .
`3) J. M. Robertson, M. W. van To!, J.P. H. Heynen, W. H. Smits and T. de Boer, Thin
`single crystalline phosphor layers grown by liquid phase epitaxy, Philips J . Research to be
`pi.Jblished .
`4) W. W. Holloway and M. Kestigian, On the fluorescence of cerium activated garnet
`crystals . Phys. Letters 25A, 614, 1967.
`5) G. Blasse and A . Bril, A new phosphor for flying spot cathode-ray tubes for yellow
`emitting Y3 Al 50 12 :Ce3+, Appl. Phys. Letts . ll, 53, 1967.
`6) W. W. Holloway and M. Kestigian, Optical properties of Ce-activated garnet crystals,
`J. Opt. Soc . Am. 59, 60, 1969.
`7) T. Y. Tien, E . F. Gibbons, R. G. Delosh, P. J. Zacmanides, D . E. Smith and H. L.
`Stadler, Ce3+ activated Y3Al 5 0 12 and some of its solid solutions, Electrochem. Soc. 120,
`278, 1973.
`8) L. A. Benderskii, A. F. Vedekhin, G. M. Topchiev, Z. P . Klimina, A. S.
`Plomod'Yalov and A. I. Panchenko, Synthesis and luminescence properties of solid
`solutions in the system YAG: Ce GdAG : Ce, Bull. Acad. Sciences USSR Phys. 38, 72, 1974.
`9) G. Blasse and A. Bril, Investigation of some Ce3+ -activated phosphors, J. Chern. Phys. 47,
`5139, 1967 .
`1°) Grown by J. Pistorius of this laboratory.
`11 ) S. L. Blank and J. W. Nielsen, The growth of magnetic garnets by liquid phase epitaxy,
`J. Cryst. Growth 17, 302, 1972.
`12) G. Blasse, The absorption of the Cra+ ion in host lattices containing pentavalent cations,
`J. Inorg. Nucl. Chern. 29, 1817, 1967.
`13) C. J. J9lrgen se n, Differences between the four halide ligands and discussion remarks on
`trigonal-bipyramidal complexes, on oxidation states, and diagonal elements of one electron
`energy, Coord. Chern. Rev. 1, 164, 1966.
`14) W. F. van der Weg and M. W. van To!, Saturation effects of cathodoluminescence in rare
`earth activated epitaxial Y3Al 50 12 layers, Appl. Phys . Letts., to be published.
`15 ) C. D . Brandle and H. Steinfink, The crystal structure of Eu 4Al 20 9 , lnorg. Chern. 8,
`1969, 1320.
`16) J. W. Reed and A. B. Chase, The unit cell and space group of 2¥20 3 : Al 20 3 , Acta Cryst.
`15, 312, 1962.
`
`30
`
`Philips Journnl of Resenrch Vol. 36 No . I 1981
`
`VIZIO 1018

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket