throbber
I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`f
`I
`I
`I
`.I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`AD-A277 850
`I 1\\\\1\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\1\\\
`
`IR ACCORDANCE WITH CLIB 0002, CDRL A002
`OF NA~RASYSCEH CONTRACT N61339-92-C-0014
`
`Final Report for period 11/1/91 to 3/25/93
`
`HIGH DEFINITION TV PROJECTION
`
`VIA SINGLE CRYSTAL FACEPLATE TECHROLOGY
`
`Approved for Public Release
`Distribution is Unlimited
`
`Prepared by:
`
`TRIDENT IRTERRATIONAL, INC.
`Central Florida Research Park
`3251 D Progress Drive
`Orlando, FL 32826
`407-282-3344
`407-282-3343 fax
`
`~-~'v\94-10588
`\ 11111111\i! l!lli lllllll\1! 11\l! llll, !I:! Ill:
`
`.
`
`,. -
`.._ ...
`
`'94 4
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0001
`
`

`

`SEC R TY CLASS ~ICA TION OF ~HIS PAG-
`Ul
`:
`
`I
`
`1a REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
`Unclassified
`
`REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
`1 b RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS
`
`~~~~~U~n~c~l~a~s~s;l~·~f~i~e~d~~~~~~
`I
`-I 2a SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY
`• I 4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT i'.UMBER(S)
`I 6a NAME 0° PERFORMING ORGANIZAT.O\
`
`2b DECLASSIFICATION I DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE
`
`....
`
`Trident International,
`
`6o OFFiCE Si'MBOL
`(If appltcable)
`
`Inc.
`
`.
`I Ba
`
`32S1 D Progress Drive
`Orlando, FL
`32826
`
`'1;.!'.':0 0: :_\~IN( S~O"JSORING
`
`Naval Air Systems Command
`-·
`ADDRESS (C•ty. Sr.He, cJnd ZIP Code)
`
`! Bb f~F~IC: ;YM30L
`!
`
`• I 11 TITLE (Include Secuflty Cl,usdtcatlon)
`I 12 PERSONAL AUTHOR(S)
`Kindl, H. J. and St. John, Thomas
`13a TYPE OF REPORT
`113b rtME COVERED
`I
`Interim
`FROMNov. 9 1 ToMar.93
`I 16 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION
`..
`Final Report for SBIR
`
`(U) High Definition TV Projection Via Single Crystal Faceplate Technology
`
`114 DATE OF REPORT (Yur, Month, Day) 115 PAGE COUNT
`
`Phase I, Topic N91-23S
`
`I '17
`•
`
`18 SUBJECT TERMS (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number)
`Video Projectors, Single Crystal Phosphor, CRTs,
`Flight Simulators
`
`COSA Tl CODES
`SUB-GROUP
`FIELD
`GROUP
`09
`OS
`I
`2S
`OS
`I 19 ABSTRACT (Contmue on revers.e if ~ssary and u:Jenttfy_ by block number)_Su~~e !=~stal phosphor
`fa!=eplates are :gltBXl.al
`strates With the advantages of htgh ltg t output, resolut1on and extend
`phos~rs grown on crystall1ne
`o~ra-
`~~ceplates appropriate to the proJection indust~up to four (4) inc sin diameter.
`'I.
`ojection systems incorp<?rat~ cathode ray t
`s utilizing single c~tal ~s~or faceplates will produce 1500
`lines of resolution, non-interlaced.
`~.~~ens of lNhite light Wlth 1
`is 1
`urren projection system will IJI!et
`~~1 of the currently specified luminance and resolution re~irements of Visual Di~y systems for fl~t sUnulators.
`sfhor faceplate
`s. Specifi-
`ife of a CRI' is expected to increase bY a factor o
`lea ly, the ful performance
`five (S); ie, fran 2000 to 10,000
`lOUrs of operation. There will be attendant reductions in maintenance tine, spare CRI' requirerrents, system down
`tine etc.
`The increased brightness of the projection system will allow use of lD~Ner gain, lCJWer cost sinulator screen material.
`~endi2&Qatisfactory c~letion of in process evaluation testing of 3" SCPF CRI's, it is recaTm:!nded that a 4" SCPF
`""lrr T2
`R/C projector head asserrbly be built and evaluated in an operational sUnulator (UH1N).
`
`1 tiona! life. Single orystal ,nosphor faoeplate industrial technol:1,1; in the Unued States is capable of prov>.ding
`1 ~fi=t l"''istic advm>t"fs accrue fran the introduc"on of single crystal
`I ':urther, picture performance characteristics will be rore balanced across the full sinlllator.
`
`1r
`
`I
`..
`lO D•STRISUTION I AVAILABILITY OF ABSTRACT
`IXJ SAME AS RPT
`0 UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED
`I t2a NAME OF RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL
`Richard C. Hebb
`I
`00 FORM 1473,84 MAR
`
`21 ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
`0 OTIC USERS Unclassified
`22b TELEPHONE (Include Area Code) 122c. OFFICE SYMBOL
`(407) )R0-~578
`NTSC/Code 2S3
`SECURITY CL'i~fJ1~.ffl0~ \n:dTHIS PAGE
`83 APR ed1t1on may be used until exha:St;d
`All other edtttons are obsolete
`
`3 DISTRIBUTION I AVAILABILITY OF REPORT
`Approved for Public Release
`Distribution is Unlimited
`
`5 MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(SJ
`
`7'N NA~E ~F MONJTORING ORGANIZATION
`ava
`ra1n1ng Systems Center
`Sensor Simulation Branch, Code 253
`
`7b ADDRESS (Ctty, State, ilnd ZIP Code)
`
`12350 Research Parkway
`Orlando, FL 32826-3224
`
`9 PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
`
`I N61339-92-C-0014
`
`WORK UNIT
`ACCESSION NO
`
`- --- -· - - -loSOURCE o; ~UND•NG NUMBERS
`TASK
`PROJECT
`PROGRAM
`ELEMENT NO
`NO
`NO
`0605502N
`
`r ADDRESS \C•ty, State. and ZIP Code)
`r
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0002
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Introduction
`
`Summary of SBIR Study #N61339-92-C-0014; High Definition
`
`TV Projection Via Single Crystal Faceplate Technology
`
`Conclusions and Considerations
`
`SBIR System Configuration Evaluation
`
`1. 0. 0
`
`2.0.0
`
`3.0.0
`
`4.0.0
`
`4.0.1
`
`4.0.2
`
`T1080 R/C
`
`New SCFP based CRT Head Assembly
`
`4.0.3
`s.o.o
`
`T1080 R
`
`Commercial Applications
`
`6.0.0
`
`Recommendations
`
`7.0.0
`
`High Definition TV Projections Via Single Crystal
`
`Faceplate Technology
`
`8.0.0
`
`CRT Cost
`
`9.0.0
`
`Logistic Support Cost Estimates (Assumptions)
`
`10.0.0
`
`Comparative Logistic Support Costs
`
`11.0.0
`
`Recommended Development Programs
`
`12.0.0
`
`Potential Products
`
`13.0.0
`
`Manufacturability
`
`13.0.1
`
`Liquid Phase of Epitaxial Growth of Single Crystal
`
`Phosphors of Ce-Yag on Yag Substrates
`
`13.0.2
`
`Photo Reticulation
`
`--.--~'
`:
`·~
`
`13.0.3
`
`Current Size limitations of Growth of Single Crystal
`
`Boules
`
`14.0.0
`
`Performance of Yag Faceplates
`
`~- f..~ . ' '. _. ' .. ''
`' '""' .
`
`'
`
`'
`•. ~ j.
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0003
`
`

`

`15.0.0
`
`16.0.0
`
`Analysis of Simulation System Visual Display Requirements
`
`Comparison of T1080 R/C Performance versus T2080 R/C
`
`Performance
`
`17.0.0
`
`Description of System (Bead Assembly) Physical Configura(cid:173)
`
`tions
`
`Figure 1. Red, Green & Blue 4" Single Crystal
`
`Faceplate CRT Assembly
`
`Figure 2. Head Assembly 0 T1080 R/C (Production)
`
`Figure 3. CRT Assembly, Single Crystal Faceplate
`
`Figure 4. SCFP based CRT
`
`Figure 5. SCFP CRT Assembly Liquid Cooled
`
`Figure 6. Bead Assembly -- T1080 R/C Compatible 3"
`
`and 4" Single Crystal Faceplate Based CRTs
`
`Figure 7. Head Assembly -- T1080 R/C Compatible 4"
`
`Single Crystal Faceplate Based CRTs
`
`Figure 8. Bead Assembly -- T1080 R/C Compatible 5"
`
`Single Crystal Faceplate Based CRTs
`
`Figure 9. Bead Assembly 4" (top view)
`
`Figure 10. Bead Assembly 4" (side view)
`
`Figure 11. Bead Assembly 4" (bottom view)
`
`Enclosures:
`
`( 1) Single Crystal Phosphor Faceplates for High
`
`Resolution, High Intensity Cathode Ray Tubes,
`
`dated February 1992.
`
`( 2) Study and Evaluation of Single Crystal Faceplate
`
`CRT Projection Display Systems for Flight and Weapon
`
`Systems Trainers, Revision A, dated 6 May 1992.
`
`(3) Study of the Performance of a YAG Faceplate.
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I·
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`' lc
`
`I
`I
`I
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0004
`
`

`

`(4) Product Performance Specification for the
`
`Trident Model T2080 R/C Dual Mode Video Projector,
`
`Specification Number 002106, dated April 5, 1991.
`
`(5) Silicon Field Emitter Arrays for
`
`Cathodoluminescent Flat Panel Displays
`
`' I
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0005
`
`

`

`,,
`
`'
`
`'
`
`tR61339-92-C-0014
`
`1.0.0
`
`Introduction
`
`Current technology projection systems utilizing glass, phosphor
`
`deposited faceplates have been manufactured in size up to 9"
`
`diagonal in both an electrostatic and electromagnetic configura(cid:173)
`
`tion. With F 1.0 lenses, these projection systems can produce 1000
`
`lumens of light output. The resolution of these projectors, based
`
`on the spot sizes possible; ie, .002" to .005", is in excess of
`
`1000
`
`lines, non-interlaced.
`
`In addition,
`
`these systems can
`
`autoscan and autolock in horizontal scan frequency from 15.750 Khz
`
`to 80 Khz; thus, bounding any current or projected Imaging Computer
`
`operating horizontal scan frequency requirement.
`
`In
`
`the areas of
`
`light output and useful operational
`
`life,
`
`conventional CRTs do not optimally meet current simulator system
`
`needs.
`
`Research and development to date has demonstrated that Single
`
`Crystal Phosphor faceplates (SCPF) could be utilized for producing
`
`high resolution, high brightness video projection cathode ray tubes
`
`(CRTs) with significantly longer operational life.
`
`The general process of fabricating a SCPF begins with the growth of
`
`a single crystal boule of Y3A15012 (YAG)2 or other garnet with a
`
`diameter large enough for a projection CRT faceplate. The boule is
`
`sliced into wafers about 0. 125 inch thick and then ground and
`
`polished to optical flat tolerances to form a substrate for
`
`epitaxial growth of doped garnet compositions. YAG doped with
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0006
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`IN61339-92-C-0014
`
`rare-earth elements, when grown as epitaxial layers on YAG
`
`substrates is a cathodoluminescent material. Such layers can be
`
`used as phosphor faceplates in cathode ray tubes with significant
`
`advantages over standard, powder phosphor, faceplates.
`
`A number of cerium doped crystals have been identified as phosphor
`
`materials for the red, green and blue faceplate requirements of
`
`projection systems.
`
`Faceplates of all three colors have been
`
`fabricated tested and evaluated.
`
`Results of these faceplate
`
`evaluations are reported in Enclosure (1).
`
`This report represents a
`
`study of
`
`the ramifications of
`
`the
`
`application of SCPF based CRTs to projection systems. For example,
`
`projection system performance, physical characteristics, cost, SCPF
`
`manufacturability, logistic support, risks; etc. are all addressed
`
`in the report and enclosures hereto.
`
`2
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0007
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`fH61339-92-C-0014
`
`2.0.0
`
`Summary of SBIR Study 192-C-0014; High Definition TV Projection Via
`
`Single Crystal Faceplate Technology
`
`1.
`
`Single Crystal Faceplate Process
`
`technology is currently
`
`limited in its ability to produce faceplates appropriate to the
`
`projection industry in diameters up to four inches (4").
`
`2. Four ( 4) inch single crystal faceplate based CRTs will meet all
`
`of the currently specified flight simulator brightness and resolu(cid:173)
`
`tion specifications. Specifically, 1500 lumens of white light and
`
`1000 lines of resolution non-interlaced can be displayed at all
`
`required brightness levels.
`
`3. Significant logistic advantages accrue from the introduction of
`
`single crystal faceplate based CRTs. Specifically, the full per(cid:173)
`
`formance life of a CRT is expected to increase by a factor of five
`
`(5); ie, from 2000 to 10,000 hours of operation. There will be an
`
`attendant reduction in maintenance time, spare CRT requirements,
`
`system down time, etc.
`
`4. The logistic support cost savings will offset the relatively
`
`small increase in product cost by at least a factor of ten (10) to
`
`one (1).
`
`3
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0008
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`tN61339-92-C-0014
`
`5. The weight of the advanced Head Assembly will be equal to or
`
`less than 150 lbs. Thus, the overall size and weight will be
`
`compatible with existing dome structures currently in operational
`
`use and allow a Visual Display System upgrade program to be
`
`implemented.
`
`6. The increased brightness of the projection system will allow
`
`use of lower gain, lower cost simulator screen material.
`
`7.
`
`Simulator picture performance characteristics will be more
`
`balanced across the full simulator.
`
`8. Given the performance results realized in engineering testing
`
`to date; it is recommended that a 3" - 4" SCPF based CRT T1080 R/C
`
`projector head aAAembly be hui.lt al"'lj evaluated in an operational
`
`simulator (UH1N).
`
`9.
`
`It is further recommended that a 4" SCPF bae"'!d CRT head
`
`assembly be developed which utilizes newly developed hybridized
`
`video and deflection amplifiers.
`
`rhe weight goal for this
`
`development should not exceed 150 lbs.
`
`10. With the exception of increased light output ( 1500 lumens) and
`
`reduced weight (150 lbs), the performance characteristics of the
`
`item described under item (9) will be equivalent to the T2080
`
`4
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0009
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`IN61339-92-C-0014
`
`raster/calligraphic specification (enclosed herewith).
`
`11. The cost to produce and implement the system configuration
`
`recommended under paragraph (8) is $450,000. The cost to produce
`
`and implement the system configuration recommended under paragraph
`
`(9) is $300,000 assuming paragraph (8) has been implemented.
`
`5
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0010
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`IR61339-92-C-0014
`
`~-0.0
`
`Conclusions and Considerations
`
`1. Brightness
`
`A projection system which will produce 1,500 lumens of white light
`
`will encompass all of the luminance needs of currently specified
`
`simulators. All other specifications of Enclosure (4) can be met.
`
`2. Projection System Size and Weight
`
`The component dimensions which dictate projection system physical
`
`characteristics begin with the CRT faceplate size and length. A
`
`standard 9" diagonal
`
`tube size will result
`
`in a
`
`system of
`
`approximate size H 12" x W 28" x L 38".
`
`The weight of such a
`
`system in total approximates 300 to 400
`
`lbs.
`
`including power
`
`supplies and remote control units. Separate Head Assembly units of
`
`these systems currently weight 200 to 250 lbs.
`
`Size and weight reductions to 150 lbs. are possible uaing a 3" or
`
`4" Single Crystal Phosphor Technology (SCPT) based CRTs.
`
`3. Faceplate Size
`
`While brightness is critical, the selection of the faceplate size
`
`(diameter) versus performance was based on a tradeoff of bright-
`
`ness, resolution, projector size and weight,
`
`simulator system
`
`capability versus current system sunk costs,
`
`logistic support
`
`costs, problems associated with manufacturing of SCPT based CRTs
`
`6
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0011
`
`

`

`IH61339-92-C-0014
`
`etc. and the cost and feasibility of manufacture of various size
`
`faceplates; ie, 3", 4" or greater.
`
`In addition to these consider(cid:173)
`
`ations, an analysis ol: the use of electronic surface or hybrid
`
`technology was evaluated to optimize projected system size and
`
`weight; ie, recommendation 6 of para 6.0.0.
`
`The determinants in specifying single crystal faceplate size are:
`
`1. Luminance and resolution requirements of
`
`military
`
`flight
`
`simulator visual display
`
`systems.
`
`2. Manufacturing capability to produce SCPF
`
`large diameter facepla~es.
`
`3.
`
`Compatability of proposed CRT with
`
`existing projection systems.
`
`4. Cost.
`
`5. Logistic support impact.
`
`1.
`
`As delineated in enclosure 4, a projection system which
`
`produces 1500 lum~:ns of white light. with 1000 lines of resolution,
`
`non-interlaced, will meet all current or projected visual display
`
`needs for military flight simulators.
`
`2.
`
`The manufacturing capability of U.S. suppliers is currently
`
`limited to producing four
`
`inch
`
`( 4" )
`
`faceplates of acceptable
`
`quality levels.
`
`3.
`
`A
`
`four
`
`inch
`
`(4")
`
`single crystal CRT
`
`is
`
`logistically
`
`interchangeable with existing nine (9) inch conventional CRTs
`
`7
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0012
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`fN61339-92-C-0014
`
`installed in the Tl080 RIC projection system.
`
`4. The cost to productionize the four inch (4") single crystal
`
`faceplate would be approximately $350,000.
`
`5.
`
`The
`
`logistic implications of
`
`introducing single crystal
`
`faceplate CRTs into simulator projection systems is very favorable
`
`because of significant life cycle cost savings, see para.lO.O.O.
`
`Given the above consideration, implementation of a four inch (4")
`
`single crystal faceplate CRT is recommended.
`
`4. Upgrade of Existing Visual Systems
`
`Existing simulators have motion bases installed that have limited
`
`weight handling capacity. The weight of the on-motion base visual
`
`display subsystem thus becomes critical to a "Visual Display System
`
`Upgrade".
`
`A lighter weight, high
`
`luminance, high resolutior
`
`projector, compatible with
`
`the existing motion base carrying
`
`capacity, would allow a cost effective visual display upgrade
`
`program. The separate head assembly projector configuration would
`
`be appropriate for this retrofit program.
`
`Design of the projection system proposed has been configured to
`
`insure the capability for replaceLlent of existing projection
`
`systems and thus incur maximum benefit to existing as well as
`
`future visual display systems.
`
`8
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0013
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`5. Proiector Bead Assembly r-eplacement
`
`IR61339-92-C-0014
`
`Simulator installations which currently meet all current system
`
`specif~cations would benefit from SCPF head assembly replacement
`
`because of the significant cost savings which would accrue from the
`
`improved CRT performance and life over the operational life of the
`
`simulator.
`
`(See para. 10.0.0).
`
`Currently, CRTs are warranted for 2000 hours of satisfactory
`
`operation; satisfactory operation being defined as generating 50%
`
`of
`
`the original
`
`light output.
`
`SCPFs have
`
`low coulombic
`
`degradation, high
`
`resistance
`
`to burning
`
`and good
`
`thermal
`
`conductance to the faceplate substrate; thus allowing operation of
`
`cathode
`
`ray
`
`tubes at power
`
`levels which would destroy
`
`a
`
`conventional powder phosphor CRT (see Enclosure 1).
`
`In addition,
`
`the "browning effect"
`
`(browning of the faceplate glass as a
`
`function of x-rays striking the glass) results in reduced light
`
`output. Since the "browning effect" does not take place in single
`
`crystal faceplates, the operational life of a SCPF based CRT will
`
`be limited by the useful life of the electron gun. An assumed
`
`electron gun life of ~0,000 hours is considered reasonable. Re(cid:173)
`
`gunning of tubes is an acceptable factory process; thus, from a
`
`logistic support point of view, a cost saving factor of 10 can be
`
`anticipated by the introduction of SCPF CRT based projection head
`
`assemblies into Simulator visual display systems.
`
`9
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0014
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`6.
`
`Recollllllended Areas of Additional SCPT CRT Development and
`
`fH61339-92-C-0014
`
`Evaluation
`
`a. Areas for potential efficiency improvement
`
`1. Coating of YAG surface to modify critical angle
`
`b. Areas for test and evaluation to delineate operational
`
`limitations and failure modes
`
`1. High voltage limits
`
`2. Faceplate frit seal heating limits
`
`3. Life test experiment to establish limiting element;
`
`eg, E-gun, etc.
`
`4. Outgassing
`
`5. X-ray generation at high power operation
`
`6. Manufacturability of SCPF CRTs
`
`10
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0015
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`4.0.0
`
`tN61339-92-C-0014
`
`SBIR SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
`
`EVALUATION
`
`This
`
`section
`
`(4.0.0)
`
`addresses
`
`the various approaches
`
`and
`
`technology options considered in arriving at
`
`the most cost
`
`effective utilization of SCPF based CRT technology in a timely and
`
`meaningful manner.
`
`1. T1080 R/C - Head Assembly
`
`a. *Replace CRTs only
`
`b. New lenses
`
`2. T1080 R Projection System
`
`a. Replace CRTs
`
`b. Current Technology
`
`c. Deflection Technology
`
`3. New Projection System
`
`a. New Video Amplifiers
`
`b. New Deflection Amplifiers
`
`c. New Lenses
`
`Consider for 3" and 4" CRTs
`
`4. Commercial B.D.T.V. Projection System
`
`**Filmless Theater Application
`
`15.750 Khz to 80 Khz
`
`a. New Video Amplifier
`
`b. New Deflection
`
`c. Single Unit
`
`11
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0016
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`fH61339-92-C-0014
`
`*All CRTs are circular, have cooling jackets attached and have
`
`appropriate lenses attached. The maximum diameter is determined by
`the heat sink.
`
`**Also called Electronic Theater
`
`Projectors which are utilized in currently deployed simulators are
`configured as follows:
`
`1. Integrated (Bead assembly with electronics and remote
`
`power supply) projector design.
`
`2. Separate Bead assembly with remote electronics and
`
`low voltage power supplies.
`
`12
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0017
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`IH61339-92-C-0014
`
`System Configuration Evaluations
`
`CRT type projection systems utilized in simulators are of two (2)
`
`functional configurations; ie, raster and raster/calligraphic.
`
`Raster projectors may either have integral power supplies or
`
`remoted power supplies. Raster/calligraphic projection systems are
`
`all of the separate head assembly, remote electronics and remote
`
`power supply configuration.
`
`Equivalent units can be fabricated with SCPF based CRTs.
`
`The
`
`extent of the changes incorporated along with the SCPF based CRTs
`
`will determine cost and schedule impact.
`
`The recommendation of this study is incorporation of SCPF based
`
`CRTs in an existing operational unit with minimal impact on system
`
`configuration; so that, the system performance can be evaluated at
`
`minimal overall cost.
`
`Satisfactory system performance would allow an early SCFP based CRT
`
`replacement program to be implemented resulting in major logistic
`
`cost savings to the national defense simulator program.
`
`13
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0018
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`fH61339-92-C-0014
`
`4.0.1
`
`I. Tl080 RIC
`
`The T1080 R/C (Raster/Calligraphic) projection system is
`
`utilized in the UB1N Simulator and compatible with
`
`the V22
`
`simulation system and is of the separate head, remote electronics
`
`and power supply, computer controlled configuration. Figure 2,
`
`graphically shows a CRT assembly from a T1080 R/C production unit.
`
`The CRT assembly (less lens) is a spareable, replacement unit.
`
`Figure 1, which follows, and figure 3 graphically shows a 4" SCPF
`
`CRT assembly which is directly interchangeable with the above T1080
`
`R/C production CRT assembly. Figure 1 is the figure referred to in
`
`6.0.0. Modification of the head assembly by replacement of the 9"
`
`CRT assembly with 4" SCPF based CRT assemblies is practical, see
`
`figure 1 through 11. All other physical and electrical elements
`
`and interfaces would remain the same.
`
`A new lens must be developed to be compatible with the
`
`CRT and required fields of view (FOV).
`
`This
`
`approach
`
`to proving
`
`the
`
`system performance
`
`characteristics of a SCPF based CRT projection system in an
`
`operational environment is considered the lowest cost approach with
`
`the maximum long term potential benefit.
`
`14
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0019
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`IH61339-92-C-0014
`
`4.0.2
`
`II. Hew SCPF based CRT Bead Assembly
`
`There are other technical developments which should be
`
`pursued in order to take full system advantage of SCPF based CRTs.
`
`These developments fall into two (2) areas:
`
`1. Fully hybridized video amplifiers
`
`Hybridization of existing T1080 video amplifiers
`
`would
`
`result
`
`in
`
`broader
`
`bandwidth,
`
`higher
`
`performance units.
`
`2. Smaller. more efficient deflection amplifiers.
`
`Smaller, more efficient deflection amplifiers can be
`
`developed, optimized to the smaller deflection
`
`angles required in 3" and 4" SCFP based CRTs.
`
`With these developments assumed, a new head assembly
`
`which can also interface with existing remote electronics can be
`
`developed. The head assembly would be smaller; (150 lbs.) thus,
`
`allowing weight benefits to be considered in new simulator designs.
`
`15
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0020
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`fH61339-92-C-0014
`
`4.0.3
`
`III. ~1080 R
`
`A T1080 R (Raster only) projection system could be
`
`fabricated using existing technology deflection amplifiers and
`
`integral power supplies. Because of the reduced power require(cid:173)
`
`ments,
`
`the total system would fall approximately within the
`
`physical configuration of an existing Tl080 R/C head assembly
`
`profile. This unit would have broad application and utility in the
`
`simulator visual system retrofit upgrade market.
`
`These units would require development of lenses to be
`
`compatible with simulator FOV requirements.
`
`Further, a raster projection system, with integrated
`
`power supplies could be upgraded for use in the simulation or
`
`"Filmless Theater" market HDTV markets.
`
`16
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0021
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`fN61339-92-C-0014
`
`5.0.0
`
`IV
`
`commercial Applications
`
`The commercial applications of
`
`the single crystal
`
`faceplate technology falls into two (2) categories:
`
`1.
`
`SCPF based CRT projection systems for "Filmless
`
`Theater/Auditorium use with HDTV aspect ratio
`
`presentations. Currently projected developments
`
`will support this potential.
`
`2. Retail HDTV markets.
`
`While SCPF based CRTs could be utilized in large,
`
`rear screen television sets, the cost would probably
`
`be prohibitively high and is thus not recommended.
`
`A cold cathode, direct view single cr:tstal faceplate
`
`system appears
`
`technically feasible and offers
`
`promis~ of
`
`superior performance
`
`to currently
`
`projected
`
`technologies at
`
`a
`
`reasonable cost.
`
`Enclosure
`
`( 6) Silicon Field Emitter Arrays for
`
`Cathodoluminescent Flat Panel Displays
`
`is
`
`a
`
`description of the technology state of cold cathode
`
`development.
`
`17
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0022
`
`

`

`IN61339-92-C-0015
`
`6.0.0
`
`RecollllllttDdations
`
`1.
`
`The following equipment configurations are recommended for
`
`development:
`
`a.
`
`Projector Head Assembly using 4" single crystal
`
`faceplate based CRTs and existing electronics.
`
`The key development items of this system would be Red,
`
`Green and Blue SCPF CRT assemblies as graphically shown in Figures
`
`1 and 3 of paragraph 4.0.1. Development time for these assemblies
`
`is estimated to be twelve {12) to fifteen {15) months. Assuming
`
`satisfactory completion of these assemblies, incorporation of the
`
`assemblies into a T1080 R/C system assembly and subsequent systems
`
`evaluation testing will encompass approximately four to six months.
`
`Cost to implement this phase of the recommendation is
`
`approximately $450,000.
`
`This includes the continued SCPF CRT
`
`development and evaluation effort recommended under paragraph
`
`3.0.6.
`
`b.
`
`Projector Head Assembly using 4" single crystal
`
`faceplate based CRTs and new video and deflection amplifiers based
`
`and developments with specifications within the range of currently
`
`projected technology advances.
`
`Subsequent to the completion of the development of the
`
`red, green and blue SCPF and proof of overall system performance,
`
`(evaluation versus requirements of enclosure 4) , the development of
`
`18
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0023
`
`

`

`tH61339-92-C-0014
`
`new wider bandwidth video amplifiers and deflection amplifiers
`
`should be initiated. These amplifiers should be of the hybrid
`
`technology configuration and be designed to meet specifications
`
`which will allow projector operation in the calligraphic mode at a
`
`horizontal scan frequency capability of 130 Khz.
`
`Development and evaluation of these amplifiers will take
`
`approximately nine (9) months.
`
`In parallel to this development effort, a mechanical
`
`projector configuration would be initiated which considers the
`
`significant
`
`change
`
`in amplifier
`
`form
`
`factor
`
`and weight.
`
`Preliminary layouts and weight analysis show that a 150 lb. head
`
`assembly is feasible.
`
`Cost to complete item (b) after completion of item (a) is
`
`estimated to be $300,000.
`
`19
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0024
`
`

`

`IH61339-92-C-0014
`
`7.0.0
`
`High Definition TV Projections via Single Crystal Phosphor
`
`Faceplate Technology
`
`The standards of HDTV,
`
`(1125 lines) will ultimately become the
`
`standard for commercial display systems as well as home television.
`
`The problem of brightness versus resolution on an adequate screen
`
`size can be solved for most commercial uses by a single crystal
`
`faceplate CRT based projection system.
`
`In addition, with full
`
`control of picture intensity across the screen, a uniformly bright
`
`picture can be displayed.
`
`Development of single crystal faceplate CRT based projection
`
`systems will have broad application to both the simulation and
`
`commercial display system markets both nationally and inter(cid:173)
`
`nationally.
`
`20
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0025
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`IH61339-92-C-0014
`
`8.0.0
`
`CRT Cost
`
`Current CRTs of the electromagnetic 9" type have a unit cost of
`
`approximately $2,500 each. At a material cost level, a projector,
`
`having three (3) CRTs red, green and blue, would have a systems
`
`cost of $7,500.
`
`The projected cost per faceplate based CRT
`
`is $5,000 each,
`
`resulting in a projector material cost o£ $15,000; thus showing an
`
`increase of approximately $7,500.
`
`The basis for these estimates were quotations solicited from
`
`alternate sources; specifically,
`
`1. Allied Signal Corp.
`
`2. Litton Airtron Industries
`
`3. Crystal Systems, Inc.
`
`4. Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics
`
`5. Hughes Display Products
`
`6. Thomas Electronics
`
`21
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0026
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`#H61339-92-C-0014
`
`9.0.0
`
`Logistic Support Assumptions
`
`All data is based on currently submitted spares pricing data for
`
`the T1080 R/C projection system of the UHlN program.
`
`1. CRT replacement assumed at 2000 hours of operation.
`
`2. Simulator use is assumed at 4000 hours per year.
`
`3. SCPF CRT tube life is assumed at 10,000 hours prior to factory
`
`regunning.
`
`4. SCPF CRT module assembly cost is assumed to be $11,500.
`
`*5. T1080 R/C CRT module assembly cost is $9,518.
`
`6. Factory CRT module turnaround cost is assumed to be the same.
`
`7. Six (6) simulators are assumed to be developed and operational.
`
`* Based on quoted costs on UH1N contract.
`
`22
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0027
`
`

`

`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`10.0.0
`
`IH61339-92-C-0014
`
`Comparative Logistic Support Costs for Five (5) Year Cycle
`Current CR~s vs SCPF/CR~s
`
`~1080 Current CR~s
`Initial CRT/Spares (2 sets)
`
`$28,554 X 2 • $57,108
`
`Following the logistic support assumptions of paragraph 9.0.0, all
`three (3) ~RTs in one (1) projector are replaced at 2000 hours cf
`ie, five
`in 10.000 hours of
`operation intervals;
`(5)
`times
`operation.
`The replacement and repair cost per CRT is $4,500;
`thus, cost per projector replacement/repair is 3 x $4,500 • $13,500
`(per projector).
`
`(1)
`(5) projectors per simulator; one
`Since there are five
`Simulator replacement cycle would cost 5 x $13,500 or $67,500.
`This replacement cycle would occur five (5) times in 10,000 hours
`of simulator operation; thus, the total cost per 10,000 hours would
`be $337,500. Because operat,~n of the Simulator is assumed to be
`4000 hours per year (20,000 hours), this cycle would be repeated
`twice for a total cost of $675,000 per simulator installation.
`
`Replacement 5 time& in 10,000 hrs
`* 1 Replacement cost/projector $13,500
`5 cycles per 10,000 hours of operation x $13,500 = $67,500
`x 5 projectors per simulator= $337,500
`x 2 (20,000 hrs of operation) per 5 years = $675,000
`
`Total five year cost per UH1N Program, assuming 6 installations:
`6 X $675,000 = $4,050,00
`
`~1080 SCPF/CR~s
`Initial SCPF/CRTs spares (2 sets) $34,500 x 2 = $69,000
`
`Replacement: 1 time in 10,000 hours.
`Replacement cost • $15,500
`1 X 15,500 • $15,500
`x 5 projectors per simulator system= $77,500
`x 2 (20,000 hours of operation) per 5 years = $155,000
`Total five year cost per UH1N Program, assuming 6 installations:
`6 X 155,000 = $930,000
`For the SCPF CRT based projector, the CRT replacement cycle would
`be reduced by a factor of five (5); ie, once every 10.000 hours
`versus five (5\ times. The resultant savings projected would be:
`$4,050,000 - $930,000 = $3,120,000
`23
`
`Vizio EX1028 Page 0028
`
`

`

`r.
`
`I
`I
`I
`!I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`tH61339-92-C-0014
`
`11.0.0
`
`Recommended Development Programs
`
`Under paragraph 3.0.6 (Recommended areas of additional SCPF CRT
`
`development and evaluation) there was listed areas pertinent to the
`
`SCPF CRT which require addi tiona! test and evaluation.
`
`There
`
`follows a brief description of the specific development action
`
`required and ex

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket