throbber
IJOPM
`13,3
`
`38
`
`Received July 1992
`Revised October 1992
`
`Evaluating a Computerized
`Maintenance Management
`System
`A. Raouf, Zulfiqar Ali and S.O. Duffuaa
`King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia
`
`Introduction
`The objective of a maintenance organization is to minimize both the cost of
`maintenance labour and material and production losses. Maintenance management
`is a complex and multifaceted task performed in parallel with production operations.
`The maintenance management work is often facilitated by the use of an automated
`maintenance management system. A large variety of computer software is available
`on the market for this purpose. A crucial problem is to select for the intended
`use an appropriate maintenance management system from those available. It is
`observed that the acquired systems often do not work satisfactorily because the
`software designers do not have sufficient experience of maintenance management[1].
`Such maintenance management systems periodically need modifications and
`require a periodic evaluation[2,3]. A major problem is to decide if the required
`maintenance management system should be developed by the management or
`purchased from those commercially available. This article describes the major
`functions of the maintenance management system to facilitate in developing a
`computerized system, and gives an instrument to select a suitable system from
`those commercially available. An example is given to illustrate the suggested
`methodology.
`
`Functions of Maintenance Management
`The computerized maintenance management systems adopted or developed by
`different organizations are often inoperative or ineffective[1]. These systems are
`frequently modified but still do not work properly. One of the common reasons
`for these failures is that the designer of the computer system had no experience
`of managing a maintenance department[1]. To design a proper and effective
`computerized maintenance management system, the designer should have an
`adequate understanding of the maintenance functions and their purpose in a
`maintenance organization. This section describes the major goals and objectives
`of the maintenance organization. Maintenance management is traditionally divided
`into three categories: maintenance functions, maintenance policy, and maintenance
`work and cost reporting[4]. It has been proven that the concepts of quality
`
`International Journal of Operations
`& Production Management, Vol 13
`No 3,1993, pp 38-48©MCB
`Unnersity Press, 0111-3577
`
`The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the King Fahd University of
`Petroleum and Minerals for conducting this research.
`
`Downloaded by Michelle Callaghan At 07:50 22 November 2016 (PT)
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 1
`
`

`
`management can also be applied to improve and make the maintenance operation
`more cost effective. Modern maintenance management goes beyond repairing
`and servicing equipment and must be broadened to the long-range performance
`aspects of the customer service system. The viability of the whole organization
`is dependent on effective maintenance policies, plans and operations. Therefore,
`the implementation of the quality control programmes by the maintenance
`management can lead to the improvement in the maintenance productivity and
`reduction in costs. The four functions of maintenance management including the
`management of the quality control programme are shown in Figure 1.
`
`Computerized
`Maintenance
`Management
`
`39
`
`Maintenance Quality Control Programmes
`A modern maintenance management must establish an effective quality control
`programme. This quality control plan aims at efficient and economical operations
`which include: improvement in equipment reliability, improvement in maintenance
`productivity, and reduction in quality costs. Quality information on these three
`distinct performance aspects is obtained from user feedback and maintenance
`feedback. A quality-controlled procedure needs to be developed which should
`aim at identifying rework of maintenance jobs and the workers responsible for
`such reworks. This improves maintenance productivity.
`
`Maintenance Functions
`Maintenance of Existing Equipment
`Maintenance management is responsible for repairing the existing equipment
`as quickly and economically as possible. They are supposed to anticipate repairs
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 2
`
`

`
`IJOPM
`13,3
`
`40
`
`based on their experience and should use cost-effective preventive maintenance
`programmes.
`
`Equipment Inspections and Service
`The maintenance management must ensure that the equipment is serviced
`promptly and is in a safe operating condition. It should determine the proper
`lubricant, its amount, and the intervals of operations.
`
`Equipment Installation
`Every new equipment installation becomes the responsibility of maintenance
`management who need to ensure that the equipment installation meets the exact
`specifications.
`
`Maintenance Store Keeping
`A maintenance stores programme is needed to receive and distribute the spares
`needed for the equipment. The management needs to decide what to stock, how
`much to order and when to order. In order to keep low the capital investment in
`spares, it is also important to maintain the stores inventory levels at an optimal
`level.
`
`Craft Administration
`Effective utilization of the maintenance manpower is one of the important and
`prime functions of maintenance management. The optimal size of the workforce
`required needs to be developed. Manpower is the most variable and most difficult
`to control element of maintenance resources.
`
`Maintenance Policy
`Maintenance Scheduling
`Maintenance scheduling is one of the most important tools used by management
`to achieve high labour productivity by arranging the sequence in which the tasks
`will be performed. Maintenance problems are known as combinational optimization
`problems. The responsibilities of the maintenance management pertaining to
`scheduling are: allocation of manpower, management of fluctuations in the
`workload, scheduling of work, management of the manpower pool, control of
`backlogs, and monitoring the flow of work orders.
`
`Work Requests
`Maintenance management needs to establish a policy for work order initiation
`and follow-up. The work orders need to have specific routeing for approval and
`priority rating.
`Selection of Workforce
`Maintenance management has to decide upon the type of workforce to employ.
`This can be done in two ways: either to use internal or outside contract employees.
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 3
`
`

`
`Controls
`For smooth and effective operation of the organization, maintenance management
`needs to establish policies for the control of the flow of paperwork and cost.
`
`Computerized
`Maintenance
`Management
`
`Maintenance Work and Cost Reporting
`Maintenance management needs to monitor closely all financial transactions and
`charges. Reports are needed to set properly the policies of maintenance management.
`Among other areas of cost monitoring are the costs of labour and material.
`
`41
`
`Type of Work
`In order to balance the maintenance workload effectively, the analysis of the work
`being performed can be made by examining the actual hours spent on different
`types of work. Important areas are: repair work, service work, preventive work,
`emergency or breakdown work. Scheduling workloads and determining efficiencies
`can be done by monitoring the time spent on each of these activities.
`
`Equipment Reports
`Equipment reports which provide two kinds of data: maintenance repair costs
`and history repair records, need to be prepared.
`
`Backlog Reports
`Backlog reports are important to establish manpower levels and reduce unnecessary
`overheads.
`
`Preventive Maintenance
`The concept of preventive maintenance is dynamic[5]. Plant management views
`the preventive maintenance in the content of days (or hours) out of service. If the
`maintenance management desires equipment to be operative a larger percentage
`of time, the amount of preventive maintenance applied to that equipment might
`be increased assuming that the maintenance personnel are capable of diagnosing
`the faults that cause the equipment to fail.
`
`Maintenance Stores Controls
`Optimal store inventory is important for cost-effective maintenance.
`Budgets
`The maintenance expenses need to be categorized for any system. It not only
`helps in bookkeeping but also provides the production department with the
`information necessary for internal control and performance evaluation.
`
`Computerized Maintenance Management System
`Computerized maintenance management systems are common in today's industries.
`Their use has brought a large number of benefits which include increased
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 4
`
`

`
`IJOPM
`13,3
`
`42
`
`productivity, reduced costs, and effective utilization of the labour force[6]. These
`computerized maintenance management systems were initially used on mainframe
`computers but this was shifted later to micro-computers[7]. A large variety of
`such systems is now commercially available. A survey conducted in 1985 reported
`a list of 60 such softwares[8], and this list has grown very rapidly during the last
`few years. These systems are installed mainly to improve the management of
`maintenance work. Figure 2 shows the basic functions of a computerized
`maintenance management system.
`
`Commercially Available Information Systems
`Computerized maintenance management systems have become economically
`attractive and no maintenance function can ignore their advantages. The maintenance
`managers should have access to the computerized maintenance management
`systems to assist them in better planning and efficiently controlling the operating
`costs. They can now purchase on-line computerized maintenance management
`systems that can provide all the required services for a maintenance operation.
`The availability of computerized maintenance management systems is increasing
`at a significantly high rate. Surveying several of such systems shows they are
`basically information systems adopted to serve the maintenance problems. They
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 5
`
`

`
`Computerized
`Maintenance
`Management
`
`43
`
`are designed for different operating systems and have varying system descriptions
`and functions to perform.
`
`Evaluation Problem
`As mentioned earlier, a large variety of "off the shelf" computerized maintenance
`management systems is available on the market. When purchasing a system,
`one that suits the specific needs and objectives of the company's maintenance
`operations should be preferred. A general instrument which can easily be applied
`for comparative evaluation of the available maintenance management systems
`is provided.
`Let i=1,..., n be the specific requirements or functions desired from a maintenance
`management system for its intended utilizations. These functions can be, for
`example, work order management, preventive maintenance management, craftsmen
`management, inventory management, maintenance management reports, vendor
`evaluation, quality management, and general considerations. Let w1 w2,..., wn
`be the respective weights or relative importance of these functions according to
`their intended use. For each of these n functions, let; = 1,..., m be the major
`characteristics which the system should offer for its effective use. The availability
`or effectiveness of these characteristics may vary from one commercial software
`to another. These characteristics of a function are not equally important for every
`user. Let b1 b2,..., bm be the relative weights of these m characteristics. In order
`to compare or select an appropriate software from those available, assign a score
`out of ten to each of the characteristics based upon its availability through
`perfectness. Let Sij be the out of ten score for each of the major characteristics
`of a function. Then, the total score for a function can be calculated as
`
`The composite score for a software is
`
`The composite score (CS) can be calculated for all the available maintenance
`management softwares and that with the highest CS can be preferred over others.
`We now illustrate the above method using a hypothetical example.
`
`Example
`Suppose two maintenance management softwares are available. The first step
`is to assign weights to the functions of these softwares. The weights can be
`determined using an appropriate technique, for example the Delphi method[9].
`Suppose the following weights are worked out to be suitable for the desired use
`of these softwares:
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 6
`
`

`
`IJOPM
`13,3
`
`44
`
`Weight out of 100 (Wt)
`Function
`25
`Work order management
`15
`Preventive maintenance management
`15
`Inventory system
`15
`Quality control management
`10
`Maintenance management reports
`10
`Vendor evaluation
`10
`General considerations
`Let us assume that bj =1 for for all the functions and; = l,...,m.
`Work Order Management
`(See Tables I to VII.)
`Aggregate score for software no. 1 = 6,975
`Aggregate score for software no. 2 = 6,240
`Therefore, the overall performance of software no. 1 is better than software no.
`2.
`
`No.
`
`Characteristics of the system
`
`Software no.
`2
`1
`
`1.
`2.
`3.
`4.
`5.
`6.
`7.
`8.
`9.
`10.
`11.
`12.
`
`13.
`
`Corrective work orders can be produced
`Preventive maintenance work orders can be produced
`Tracks labour costs automatically
`Tracks material costs automatically
`The work order uses priority codes
`The work order uses status codes
`Sorts backlog by craft and priority
`Produces a list of active work orders
`Maintains an active equipment history
`Allows for manual entry of work order cost estimates
`Produces a list of work orders ready for scheduling
`Provides net capacity calculations to compensate for
`work interruptions
`Allows for complex planning such as crafts, materials tools, etc.
`
`7
`5
`9
`10
`8
`6
`10
`10
`7
`8
`4
`
`6
`10
`
`8
`4
`9
`10
`0
`4
`10
`10
`6
`8
`5
`
`4
`8
`
`Total
`= 100
`2,500
`A1 =
`
`86
`2,150
`
`Table I.
`Work Order
`Management
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 7
`
`

`
`No.
`
`Characteristics of the system
`
`Software no.
`1
`2
`
`1.
`2.
`3.
`4.
`5.
`6.
`7.
`8.
`9.
`10.
`
`The system will schedule PM by calendar date
`Allows for more than one PM order per piece of equipment
`Prints individual PM work orders
`Provides a detailed description of the PM tasks to be performed
`Prints a PM workload forecast for any given week or weeks
`Allows for lead or lag time for scheduling the PM work order
`Allows for a detailed listing of the PM tasks to be performed
`Produces a report of overdue PM work orders
`Projects the impact of the PM workload on the weekly schedule
`Produces a report of the PM inspection results
`
`10
`8
`10
`0
`5
`8
`7
`0
`9
`0
`
`7
`5
`10
`7
`5
`8
`6
`0
`7
`0
`
`Computerized
`Maintenance
`Management
`
`45
`
`= 57
`Total
`A2 =
`= 855
`
`55
`825
`
`Table II.
`Preventive Maintenance
`Management (PM)
`
`No.
`
`Characteristics of the system
`
`Software no.
`1
`2
`
`1.
`2.
`3.
`4.
`5.
`6.
`7.
`8.
`9.
`10.
`11.
`12.
`
`Produces an inventory reorder report
`8
`8
`Maintains unit price information for all spares
`Identifies bin location of all spares
`9
`Produces a report for all work orders waiting for material
`8
`Attaches all material costs to the work order
`7
`Keeps a history record on all stores items use
`9
`Keeps the economic order quantity for stock reorder
`8
`Keeps the max-min stock quantities on record
`9
`Produces a cost of inventory-on-hand report
`6
`Produces a complete store stock catalogue
`5
`Provides on-line parts inventory information
`4
`Allows for entering unused materials back into the stores inventory 8
`
`5
`8
`6
`0
`5
`10
`7
`6
`7
`9
`6
`5
`
`Total = 89
`A3 = 1,335
`
`74
`1,110
`
`Table III.
`Stores Inventory
`System
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 8
`
`

`
`IJOPM
`13,3
`
`46
`
`Table IV.
`Maintenance
`Management Reports
`
`Table V.
`General Considerations
`
`No.
`
`Characteristics of the system
`
`1.
`2.
`3.
`4.
`5.
`6.
`7.
`8.
`9.
`10.
`
`Produces daily control reports
`Produces equipment history reports
`Produces management reports on a monthly basis
`Can produce management reports on demand
`Produces reports tracking the system's backlog by craft
`Produces failure analysis reports
`Produces craft usage reports
`Produces budget overrun reports
`Reports on all incomplete work orders by priority
`Capable of performing statistical and trend analysis
`
`No.
`
`Characteristics of the system
`
`1.
`2.
`3.
`4.
`5.
`
`6.
`7.
`8.
`
`The system is user friendly
`The system is menu-driven
`The system is on-line and integrated
`The system has an ongoing support program
`The system keeps historical records until they
`are deleted from the system
`The system has security password or code protection
`The system runs on hardware already on-site
`The system requires the purchase of special hardware
`
`Software no.
`1
`2
`
`6
`7
`0
`7
`9
`0
`7
`5
`8
`9
`
`6
`9
`10
`5
`9
`5
`7
`9
`7
`9
`
`Total = 58
`A4 = 580
`
`76
`760
`
`Software no.
`1
`2
`
`7
`9
`10
`0
`
`6
`8
`5
`0
`
`9
`9
`6
`7
`
`6
`8
`0
`10
`
`Total = 45
`A5 = 450
`
`55
`550
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 9
`
`

`
`No.
`
`Characteristics of the system
`
`Software no.
`1
`2
`
`1.
`2.
`3.
`4.
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`8.
`9.
`
`The vendor can supply installation support
`The vendor has a documented installation programme
`The vendor will provide a list of installation references
`The vendor will provide guidance during the data input
`The vendor has a maintenance consultant on staff to provide
`assistance in formatting data for entry into the system
`The vendor provides documentation for installation, user
`manuals, and training manuals
`The software can be self-installed
`The vendor can provide training on-site or at their facilities
`The vendor offers a planned enhancement and support program
`for existing and future software
`
`5
`0
`8
`8
`
`6
`
`10
`6
`7
`
`5
`
`6
`7
`4
`8
`
`6
`
`7
`4
`5
`
`0
`
`No.
`
`Characteristics of the system
`
`1.
`2.
`3.
`4.
`5.
`6.
`
`Statistical techniques used are available
`System keeps quality training records
`System keeps the quality records
`System keeps customer complaints record
`Quality failure data available for analysis
`Capable of tracing back data pertaining to quality
`
`47
`Total = 55
`A6 = 550 470
`
`Software no.
`1
`2
`
`10
`8
`6
`8
`7
`8
`
`5
`7
`4
`5
`4
`0
`
`Total = 47
`A7 = 705
`
`25
`375
`
`Computerized
`Maintenance
`Management
`
`47
`
`Table VI.
`Vendor and Service
`Evaluation System
`
`Table VII.
`Quality Control
`Management
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 10
`
`

`
`IJOPM
`13,3
`
`48
`
`Conclusion
`The enormous amount of data pertaining to maintenance management coupled
`with the need for its analysis and reporting has necessitated the use of computer
`softwares. A large variety of computerized maintenance management systems
`is available commercially. An instrument is given to evaluate the given softwares
`and select the most appropriate one for a specific use.
`
`References
`1. Herbaty, F., Handbook of Maintenance Management, Noyes Publications, NJ, 1990, p. 306.
`2. Duffuaa, S.O., Shuaib, A.N., Raouf, A. and Budair, M.O., "Evaluation of Maintenance
`Management Systems", King Saud Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 4, 1992, pp. 2943.
`3. Duffuaa, S.O., Shuaib, A.N., Raouf, A. and Budair, M.O., "A Framework for Evaluation of
`Maintenance Management System", Proceedings of the Symposium on Maintenance Planning
`and Operations, King Saud University, Riyad, Saudi Arabia, March 1990, pp. 576-84.
`4. Wireman, T., Computerized Management Systems, Industrial Press, New York, NY, 1986.
`5. Mann, L.J., Maintenance Management, Lexington Books, D.C. Heath and Company, Toronto,
`p. 135.
`6. Bagadia, K., Microcomputer-aided Maintenance Management, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New
`York, NY, 1987.
`7. Allman, G.W. and Bottom, J.H., "Scheduling Maintenance Projects with Ease - Using a Micro(cid:173)
`computer Applications Software", Plant Engineering, June 1985.
`8. Ketzel, J., "Microcomputer Applications Softwares", Plant Engineering, June 1985.
`9. Dalkey, N., Helmers, A., "Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of the
`Experts", Management Science, Vol. 9 No. 3, 1963, pp. 458-67.
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 11
`
`

`
`This article has been cited by:
`
`1. Tingting Jiang, Xuehui An, R. Edward Minchin, Shuyang Li. 2016. Application of Discrete-Event Simulation in the
`Quantitative Evaluation of Information Systems in Infrastructure Maintenance Management Processes. Journal of Management
`in Engineering 32:2, 05015008. [CrossRef]
`2. R S Velmurugan College of Management and Economics Studies, University of Petroleum & Energy Studies, Delhi, India
`Tarun Dhingra College of Management and Economics Studies, University of Petroleum & Energy Studies, Delhi, India .
`2015. Maintenance strategy selection and its impact in maintenance function. International Journal of Operations & Production
`Management 35:12, 1622-1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
`3. Fahriye UysalDepartment of International Trade and Logistics, Ayşe Sak School of Applied Sciences, Akdeniz University,
`Antalya, Turkey Ömür TosunDepartment of Business Administration, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences,
`Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. 2012. Fuzzy TOPSIS‐based computerized maintenance management system selection.
`Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 23:2, 212-228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
`4. Orlando Durán. 2011. Computer-aided maintenance management systems selection based on a fuzzy AHP approach. Advances
`in Engineering Software 42:10, 821-829. [CrossRef]
`5. Andrés Gómez, María Carmen Carnero. 2011. Selection of a Computerised Maintenance Management System: a case study
`in a regional health service. Production Planning & Control 22:4, 426-436. [CrossRef]
`6. Mirka KansVäxjö University, Växjö, Sweden. 2009. The advancement of maintenance information technology. Journal of
`Quality in Maintenance Engineering 15:1, 5-16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
`7. Mirka Kans. 2008. An approach for determining the requirements of computerised maintenance management systems.
`Computers in Industry 59:1, 32-40. [CrossRef]
`8. Yu-Su Shum, Dah-Chuan Gong. 2003. DESIGN OF AN INTEGRATED MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
`Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers 20:4, 337-354. [CrossRef]
`9. E.A.M. MjemaDepartment of Engineering Management and Entrepreneurship, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 2002.
`An analysis of personnel capacity requirement in the maintenance department by using a simulation method. Journal of Quality
`in Maintenance Engineering 8:3, 253-273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
`
`CiM Ex. 1041 Page 12

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket