IPR2017-00477
`U.S. Patent No. 8,387,132
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________________
`
`LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. and EMC CORPORATION
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I, LLC
`Patent Owner
`______________________
`
`CASE NO.: IPR2017-00477
`U.S. PATENT NO. 8,387,132
`______________________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box. 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Certification of Service Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4)
`
`I hereby certify that on March 1, 2018, I caused a true and correct copy of
`the attached PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES to be served via email on
`the following counsel of record for Patent Owner:
`
`
`Byron L. Pickard, bpickard-PTAB@skgf.com,
`Lori A. Gordon, lgordon-PTAB@skgf.com,
`Lestin L. Kenton, lkenton-PTAB@skgf.com,
`ptab@skgf.com
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N. W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`
`James R. Hietala, jhietala@intven.com
`Tim R. Seeley, tim@intven.com
`Intellectual Ventures
`3150 139th Avenue S.E.
`Bellevue, WA 98005
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Christopher Centurelli/
`Christopher Centurelli
`Reg. No. 44,599
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Petitioner’s
`Demonstrative Slides
`
`IPR2017-00477
`U.S. Patent No. 8,387,132
`
`March 5, 2018
`
`Page 1 of 28
`
`LENOVO ET AL. EXHIBIT 1031
`Lenovo et al. v. Intellectual Ventures I, LLC
`IPR2017-00477
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 8,387,132
`U.S. Patent No. 8,387,132
`
`USOOSS S7132B2
`
`AAxAA
`\\xAA
`
`(ll)
`(In) Patent No:
`United States Patent
`US 8,387,132 32
`Frank et 3].
`
`Well. 26, 2013L45) Date of Patent:
`INFORM \TmV PK,
`T ( nwvrnVTr‘ \TTOV
`as]
`vanrl-m'm r imd
`WITH VIRTUAL on.” 15
`U K PATFNT DOl'fUrvaTS
`1: mu
`mm W
`A
`Invmmn:
`(,hxrlcs Wi
`ialn Frank. Tn’inr. (‘A
`‘7 Wu
`Wal. mx:
`7 WW3 M73
`,«mlmda
`1'TIS)'Thlnma~ Eur] T udwig San
`shuumvw
`(‘Iememe (‘.\ (U >
`maleWanmeRomn:Ande/a
`x was
`nabhm Jr Pom). LA (US Mark
`4 was
`Adam. Los Ange
`‘
`8 ‘99!)
`12 V99!)
`11 19%{190' um
`41908 Mull
`((Sonlimmd]
`I‘OREHJN l’AihNi DUCUMkNiS
`may: ‘4
`2
`«ms \ m
`<
`\992
`{Conlinuudj
`OTTWR PI VTN TA' ATTONS
`«mum m1 -~ ~rmn-mamrrum-
`«.ms,’ n. Pmnucdmgv
`ovum um \‘ympKMHm m. (Tcmlmg s)
`\ Y’rmcvpks um um
`((‘unnnumn
`Prmmrr
`mini/1w 7 Wflhum lumen
`,1“ , mn/
`rumirwr
`mm shmfer Hammnn
`6.11, or 111m
`Schwabc. Williamson 5;
`(m AA/umW
`VVVnH m"
`ABSTRACT
`(57;
`denlcs and mmhuds mar pmVidc “mm dm'icr cmnmuui-
`c mu \]
`Hnmmnon p 'kela
`Iddmssed 10 1h: ”rum
`defic
`\1mm1 dmiaes aggregate Cnpnlfllines of mrga
`rim nd mpmenuhm v
`upemunmulmce
`m vcmnh: ~y<lum~ Ph
`x ”mm and mum
`ileum» commuted wnhm mndulw are able m cummu 'mm
`and coupmm We! cxlumu disluncc: m a nu lorpu‘rfashr
`ion \‘m 3 mm bus tunnel offcnug addressing and dam
`mxuspurl llvncuomlmy. Such modules and mclhmh can bc
`combxucd with disk dn cs [0 form KMD-likc smmgc sn'uc-
`mm
`21 Claims. 3 Drawing Sheels
`
`Page 1 01'24
`
`Notice:
`
`Assrgncc. Ralem Reume 31mm. L.L
`\Vlhnlngmn. HP, (US;
`Subject (0 any dnclnimer, Ihe mnn nft‘ms
`puLin i3
`‘xLunch or adiuncd umlcr
`U s.(
`*
`‘1); by 704»
`This pulcnl is mm m a lcrmiuul an»
`simmer
`12/574.622
`on. o, 2009
`Prior Puhl miun mm
`US lam/009503 A1
`4111112010
`
`Related U.S. Applirmilln Dam
`Cominuatiou of apphcau’on l\o. 11,139,106. filed on
`May 26 2005, now Pm N0 7 620 081
`1m. (‘1.
`GIMF 9/00
`(2006 01)
`(ii/61' 15/16
`(2000 01)
`mum. m \
`(Mar 17/01)
`U.
`726'
`'lwnliun Starch
`held MCI”,
`Sec appllcmlcu filc fur complete watch mm;
`
`
`mm
`
`emmsm "‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LENOVO ET AL. EXHIBIT 1001
`
`PET-2
`
`Page 2 of 28
`
`

`

`’132 Patent Overview
`
`Ex. 1001, Fig. 5 (annotated); Petition, 12
`
`PET-3
`
`Page 3 of 28
`
`

`

`’132 Patent Overview
`
`Ex. 1001, Fig. 6 (annotated); Petition, 14
`
`PET-4
`
`Page 4 of 28
`
`

`

`’132 Patent Claim 1
`
`Ex. 1001, 20:53-21:6; Petition, 34-35
`
`PET-5
`
`Page 5 of 28
`
`

`

`Cramer Overview
`
`Ex. 1005, Figs. 1-2 (annotated); Petition, 25
`
`PET-6
`
`Page 6 of 28
`
`

`

`Cramer Overview
`
`Ex. 1005, Fig. 3; Petition, 26, 42
`
`PET-7
`
`Page 7 of 28
`
`

`

`Ground 1 – Contested Limitations
`
`Ex. 1001, 20:53-21:6 (annotated); Petition, 34-35
`
`PET-8
`
`Page 8 of 28
`
`

`

`Ground 1 - Issues for Discussion
`
`1. Whether Cramer teaches or suggests a first virtual
`object being a
`logical drive partition
`that
`represents an aggregation of storage capabilities of
`a plurality of storage devices.
`
`2. Whether Cramer teaches or suggests the first and
`second host addresses are different network
`routable addresses.
`
`3. Whether Cramer teaches or suggests the first and
`second host addresses are both associated with a
`common frame address.
`
`Reply, 2; Patent Owner Response, 1
`
`PET-9
`
`Page 9 of 28
`
`

`

`Cramer Teaches – A First Virtual Object
`
`Ex. 1005, 2:17-19; Petition, 37
`
`Ex. 1005, 8:57-9:1 (annotated); Petition, 36-37
`
`PET-10
`
`Page 10 of 28
`
`

`

`Cramer Teaches – A First Virtual Object
`
`Ex. 1002, ¶ 57 (Karlin Declaration); Petition, 37
`
`Ex. 2003, 18:14-21 (Karlin Deposition); Reply, 5, 6
`
`PET-11
`
`Page 11 of 28
`
`

`

`Cramer Teaches – A First Virtual Object
`
`Ex. 1005, 2:24-34 (annotated); Petition, 38; Reply, 6
`
`PET-12
`
`Page 12 of 28
`
`

`

`Shenoy Testimony
`
`Ex. 1029, 136:25-137:1 (Shenoy Deposition); Reply, 8
`
`Ex. 1029, 136:10-20 (Shenoy Deposition)(annotated); Reply, 7-8
`
`PET-13
`
`Page 13 of 28
`
`

`

`Shenoy Testimony
`
`Ex. 1029, 168:6-169:4 (Shenoy Deposition)(objections omitted); Reply, 11-12
`
`Ex. 1029, 105:5-17 (Shenoy Deposition); Reply, 12
`
`PET-14
`
`Page 14 of 28
`
`

`

`Cramer Teaches – A First Virtual Object
`
`Ex. 1030, ¶13 (Karlin Declaration); Reply, 6-9
`
`Ex. 1005, 6:17-27; Ex. 1030, ¶13-14; Reply, 6-9
`
`PET-15
`
`Page 15 of 28
`
`

`

`Ground 1 – Network Routable Addresses
`
`Ex. 1001, 20:53-21:6 (annotated); Petition, 34-35
`
`PET-16
`
`Page 16 of 28
`
`

`

`Cramer Teaches – Network Routable Addresses
`
`Ex. 1005, 11:4-6 (annotated); Petition, 37
`
`Ex. 1005, 4:58-64(annotated); Reply, 17; Ex. 1002, ¶58
`
`Ex. 1005, Fig. 4 (annotated); Petition, 37
`
`Ex. 1005, 9:33-41(annotated); Petition, 38; Reply, 13
`
`PET-17
`
`Page 17 of 28
`
`

`

`Cramer Teaches – Network Routable Addresses
`
`Ex. 1002, ¶58 (Karlin Declaration); Petition, 38-39
`
`Ex. 1005, 9:67-10:3; Reply, 15
`
`PET-18
`
`Page 18 of 28
`
`

`

`Cramer Teaches – Network Routable Addresses
`
`Ex. 2003, 36:14-37:5 (Karlin Deposition); Reply, 16-17
`
`Ex. 2003, 42:11-18 (Karlin Deposition); Reply, 17
`
`PET-19
`
`Page 19 of 28
`
`

`

`Ground 1 – A Common Frame Address
`
`Ex. 1001, 20:53-21:6; Petition, 34-35
`
`PET-20
`
`Page 20 of 28
`
`

`

`Cramer Teaches – A Common Frame Address
`
`Ex. 1005, 9:44-54 (annotated); Petition, 39
`
`Ex. 1005, 10:4-7; Petition, 39; Reply, 17
`
`PET-21
`
`Page 21 of 28
`
`

`

`Cramer Teaches – A Common Frame Address
`
`Reply, 19; see also Petition, 38-40
`
`Ex. 1005, Figs. 1-2 (annotated); Petition, 25; Reply, 20
`
`PET-22
`
`Page 22 of 28
`
`

`

`Ground 2 - Issues for Discussion
`
`1. Whether a person of skill in the art would be
`motivated to combine Cramer with Banga.
`
`Reply, 22; Patent Owner Response, 25-26
`
`PET-23
`
`Page 23 of 28
`
`

`

`Banga Teaches – IP Addresses sharing a NIC
`
`Petition, 31
`
`Ex. 1008, 12:3-6; Petition, 31-32
`
`PET-24
`
`Page 24 of 28
`
`

`

`Motivation to Combine
`
`Ex. 1002, ¶75 (Karlin Declaration); Petition, 60
`
`PET-25
`
`Page 25 of 28
`
`

`

`Shenoy Testimony
`
`Ex. 1029:71:4-72:9 (Shenoy Deposition); Reply, 23
`
`Reply, 23
`
`PET-26
`
`Page 26 of 28
`
`

`

`
`
`PET-27
`PET-27
`
`Page 27 of 28
`
`

`

`’132 Patent Claim 9
`
`Ex. 1001, 21:38-55; Petition, 35.
`
`PET-28
`
`Page 28 of 28
`
`