throbber
US005884735A
`
`United States Patent
`
`[19]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,884,735
`
`Eckel et al.
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`Mar. 23, 1999
`
`[54]
`
`SPEED-ADAPTIVE VIBRATION DAMPENER
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Hans-Gerd Eckel, Laudenbach; Anja
`Kunkel, Siedelsbrunn, both of Germany
`
`[73] Assignee: Carl Freudenberg, Weinheim,
`Germany
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 792,584
`
`[22]
`
`Filed:
`
`Jan. 30, 1997
`
`..................... .. 416/500
`4/1975 Saunders et al.
`3,874,818
`416/500
`8/1980
`4,218,187
`.. 76/574
`3/1987 Puszakowski ..
`4,653,169
`74/574
`4/1988 Berger et al.
`..
`4,736,679
`74/574
`2/1993 Wolf et al.
`.
`5,188,002
`74/574
`5,269,197 12/1993 Yang ........ ..
`464/180
`5,352,157 10/1994 Ochs et al.
`188/378
`5,495,924
`3/1996 Shaw et al.
`74/574
`..
`5,605,078
`2/1997 Taylor et al.
`5,666,862
`9/1997 Eckeletal. ............................. .. 74/574
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`[30]
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`598811
`
`2/1948 United Kingdom .
`
`Feb. 6, 1996
`
`[DE]
`
`Germany ...................... .. 196 04 160.0
`
`Int. Cl.6 .................................................. .. F16F 15/131
`[51]
`[52] U.S. Cl.
`........................... .. 188/378; 74/574; 267/136
`[58] Field of Search .......................... .. 188/268, 378-380,
`188/218 A; 267/136; 74/574, 572, 573 R;
`76/604; 464/180; 416/145, 500
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2/1936 Salomon ................................. .. 74/574
`2,029,796
`5/1937 Sarazin .... ..
`74/574
`2,079,226
`2,184,734 12/1939
`'
`74/574
`2,272,189
`2/1942
`74/574
`2,306,959 12/1942
`74/604
`2,332,072 10/1943
`74/604
`2,348,941
`5/1944
`.. 74/574
`2,379,255
`6/1945
`2,387,776 10/1945
`
`Primary Emmi/1er—Douglas C. Butler
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Milde, Hoffberg & Macklin, LLP
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Avibration dampener adapts to different speeds of rotation.
`The device comprises a drive collar (1) and several inertial
`masses
`The collar rotates around a central axis (3) and
`the inertial masses pivot around peripheral axes along the
`direction of rotation. Each inertial mass is secured to the
`
`The bolts, which extend parallel the
`collar by two bolts
`central axis, are distributed around the circumference of the
`collar, and roll back and forth along arcs
`The arcs are
`concave toward the central axis in the vicinity of the collar
`and concave in the opposite direction in the vicinity of the
`inertial masses. The bolts extend through a guide (7) toward
`the sides facing away from the associated arcs.
`
`10 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`Valeo Exhibit 1112, pg. 1
`
`Valeo Exhibit 1112, pg. 1
`
`

`
`Mar. 23, 1999
`
`Sheet 1 of 2
`
`5,884,735
`
`Valeo Exhibit 1112, pg. 2
`
`Valeo Exhibit 1112, pg. 2
`
`

`
`Mar. 23, 1999
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`5,884,735
`
`Ixj2%41/R
`5:.M
`?iI
`
`N/I...,\J., ~.
`
`Valeo Exhibit 1112, pg. 3
`
`Valeo Exhibit 1112, pg. 3
`
`

`
`5,884,735
`
`1
`SPEED-ADAPTIVE VIBRATION DAMPENER
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention concerns a vibration dampener that
`adapts to different speeds of rotation. The device comprises
`a hub or “drive collar” and several inertial masses. The drive
`collar rotates around a central axis and the inertial masses
`
`pivot about peripheral axes in the direction of rotation. Each
`inertial mass is secured to the collar by two bolts. The bolts
`are parallel to the central axis and are distributed around the
`circumference of the collar. The bolts roll back and forth
`
`along arcs. The arcs are concave toward the central axis in
`the vicinity of the collar and concave in the opposite
`direction in the vicinity of the inertial masses.
`A vibration dampener of this type is known from the
`British Patent No. 598 811. In this device the arcs consist of
`sections of bore walls. The bores are considerably wider
`than the bolts. In the event of vibration, the bolts roll over
`the walls, continuously varying the distance between each
`inertial mass and the central axis during the course of each
`individual vibration. Since the frequencies inherent in such
`a vibration dampener are proportional
`to the speed of
`rotation, vibrations with frequencies that are also propor-
`tional thereto can be eliminated over the whole range of
`speeds. All cyclically operating machinery, motor vehicle
`internal combustion engines for example, exhibit such speed
`proportional frequencies.
`The bolts and arcs in this known speed-adaptive vibration
`dampener are forced toward each other as long as the shaft
`turns. The inertial masses all revolve around, and are located
`as far from the central axis as possible as long as the shaft
`continues to rotate at a constant speed. This state is
`disrupted, however, when the shaft stops rotating. All of the
`components then shift, subject to gravity, as far downward
`toward the earth’s center as possible. The inertial masses and
`bolts distributed around the device will accordingly differ in
`distance from the central axis.
`
`When speed-adaptive vibration dampeners stop rotating,
`the transition from motion to rest is unpleasantly apparent
`when the inertial masses on the other side of the shaft from
`
`the earth’s center plummet suddenly downward and the bolts
`collide against whatever section of the metal bore wall
`confronts them. The result is a loud clang. A similar phe-
`nomenon (and noise) accompanies the transition from rest to
`motion.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The principal object of the present invention is to provide
`a speed- adaptive vibration dampener of the aforesaid type in
`which the displacement of inertial masses during the tran-
`sition from rest to motion and vice versa will not result in an
`
`impermissible clanging sound.
`This object, as well as other objects which will become
`apparent from the discussion that follows, are achieved, in
`accordance with the present invention by providing a speed-
`adaptive Vibration dampener of the aforesaid type in which
`bolts extend through a guide toward the sides facing away
`from the associated arcs. The bolts begin to be supported by
`the guides on the side facing away from the arcs as soon as
`a low speed level has been exceeded and before a high
`relative speed has been attained. Clanging is therefore
`maintained at acceptable levels in all relevant situations.
`Clanging can be reduced even further if the guides are
`made of a polymeric material, specifically polyurethane or
`polyamide for example.
`
`2
`Alternatively, an elastomer can be employed. The resil-
`ience of such a material ensures particularly effective noise
`reduction.
`
`The vibration suppressing layers can terminate along the
`circumference on each side in catches that limit the motion
`
`of the bolts along the circumference to a specific extent. The
`slot that each bolt can accordingly move within is kidney
`shaped. It is initially demarcated by the arcs that the bolts
`roll along, then by the guides that support the bolts while the
`vibration dampener is at rest, and finally on both sides along
`the circumference by the catches that limit the motion of the
`bolts. All these sections merge smoothly, ideally eliminating
`sudden changes in direction.
`The arcs and guides can be components of insert parts that
`clip into recesses in the collar or in the inertial masses or
`both. They can be modified in size and shape, allowing each
`vibration dampener to be ideally adapted to various appli-
`cations. Assembly is very simple. They can also just be
`inserted into the recesses and secured there with cement,
`screws, or rivets.
`It has been demonstrated to be particularly reliable for the
`vibration suppressing layer
`to be applied to the arc-
`supporting insert pieces and recesses by direct molding and
`curing of the material they are made of. There are extra
`advantages to applying the adhesive to both halves in this
`case, in the compensation of tolerances between the insert
`pieces and the recesses and in the immobility of the insert
`pieces with the recesses. The vibration-suppressing layer
`material can be injected and cured.
`For a full understanding of the present invention, refer-
`ence should now be made to the following detailed descrip-
`tion of the preferred embodiments of the invention as
`illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is a front view of the preferred embodiment of a
`speed-adaptive vibration dampener according to the inven-
`tion.
`
`FIG. 2 is a detailed View of an insert piece that can be
`introduced into the collar of the vibration dampener illus-
`trated in FIG. 1.
`
`FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view through a portion of the
`speed-adaptive vibration dampener of FIG. 1.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`The preferred embodiments of the present invention will
`now be described with reference to FIGS. 1-3 of the
`
`Identical elements in the various figures are
`drawings.
`designated with the same reference numerals.
`The speed-adaptive vibration dampener illustrated in the
`accompanying drawings comprises a hub or drive collar 1
`and several inertial masses 2. Collar 1 rotates around a
`
`central axis 3. Each inertial mass 2 pivots around a periph-
`eral axis equidistant from central axis 3, more or
`less
`accompanying the device’s overall rotation 4. Each inertial
`mass 2 is secured in collar 1 by two bolts 5. Bolts 5 are
`distributed along the device’s circumference and extend
`parallel to central axis 3. The bolts roll back and forth along
`arcs 6. Arcs 6 are concave toward central axis 3 in the
`vicinity of collar 1 and concave in the opposite direction in
`the vicinity of inertial masses 2. The bolts 5 extend through
`guides 7 toward the sides facing away from the associated
`arcs. Each guide 7 consists of a layer 8 of polymer, rubber
`for instance. The guides are demarcated on each side by
`
`Valeo Exhibit 1112, pg. 4
`
`Valeo Exhibit 1112, pg. 4
`
`

`
`5,884,735
`
`3
`catches 9 that also limit the circumferential motion of each
`
`bolt. The bolts are wide enough in relation to the radial
`separation between each arc and its associated guide to
`eliminate any, or at least any significant play.
`Arcs 6 and guide 7 are components of insert parts per-
`manently maintained by clips or otherwise in recesses 10 in
`the collar 1 and inertial masses 2. The extent of the recesses
`
`10 in the inertial masses 2 are illustrated in FIG. 2 by broken
`lines. The inertial masses can also have a different shape,
`rectangular for example,
`than that shown in FIG. 2.
`Although rectangular
`inertial masses are easier
`to
`manufacture, they necessitate a reduction in the theoretically
`attainable overall mass.
`
`The insert pieces 6.1 and 6.2 that constitute arcs 6 can also
`be accommodated loosely in the recesses 10 and fused into
`place when the vibration suppression layers 8 that support
`the guides 7 are molded to the recesses and to insert pieces
`6.1 as illustrated in FIG. 2. The result is not only a tight and
`secure seat for the insert pieces but also an absolutely precise
`association between the arcs and guides and the inertial
`masses or central axis 3. Any undesirable imbalance of the
`rotating vibration dampener will accordingly be counter-
`acted. It has been demonstrated to be particularly practical
`for the insert pieces to be extruded. Such pieces are distin-
`guished by their particularly excellent surface quality. The
`recesses, on the other hand, can be stamped out. Any
`observable surface imprecision will be automatically taken
`care of when the vibration-suppression layers 8 are molded
`in.
`
`The drive collar 1 in the embodiment illustrated in FIG.
`
`1 through 3 incorporates a flange in the vicinity of its outer
`circumference, with the inertial masses 2 on both sides
`axially adjacent thereto. The masses are mounted in the
`collar 1 on bolts 5 that extend radially through a guide 7 on
`the side facing away from the particular arc 6 and are
`radially supported.
`The bolts 5 are cylindrical. They can also be tubular, if
`desired. They are prevented from escaping axially by plastic
`caps 11 secured tight against the collar 1 and covering each
`end of the bolts. Inertial masses 2 are accommodated in the
`
`remaining space 12. They, as well as the bolts, are prevented
`from displacing axially in relation to the collar 1 by the caps
`11, as illustrated in FIG. 3. The caps can also be made of
`metal.
`
`The speed-adaptive vibration dampener in accordance
`with the present invention is intended to insure that the radial
`distance between inertial masses 2 and central axis 3 will
`
`constantly vary as bolts 5 roll over arcs 6, eliminating
`vibrations throughout the whole range of speeds.
`There has thus been shown and described a novel speed-
`adaptive vibration dampener which fulfills all the objects
`and advantages sought
`therefor. Many changes,
`modifications, variations and other uses and applications of
`
`4
`the subject invention will, however, become apparent to
`those skilled in the art after considering this specification
`and the accompanying drawings which disclose the pre-
`ferred embodiments thereof. All such changes,
`modifications, variations and other uses and applications
`which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the
`invention are deemed to be covered by the invention, which
`is to be limited only by the claims which follow.
`What is claimed is:
`
`1. Avibration dampener that adapts to different speeds of
`rotation, comprising a drive collar and several
`inertial
`masses arranged thereon, wherein the collar rotates around
`a central axis and the inertial masses pivot about peripheral
`axes in the direction of rotation, wherein each inertial mass
`is secured to the collar by a pair of bolts extending parallel
`to the central axis, distributed around the circumference of
`the collar, and which roll back and forth along arcs, wherein
`the arcs are concave toward the central axis in a vicinity of
`the collar and concave in an opposite direction in a vicinity
`of the inertial masses, and wherein each pair of bolts extends
`through a guide toward the sides facing away from the
`associated arcs.
`
`2. The vibration dampener defined in claim 1, wherein
`each guide is formed of a vibration-suppressing layer of
`polymeric material.
`3. The vibration dampener defined in claim 1, wherein the
`vibration-suppressing layer is elastomeric.
`4. The vibration dampener defined in claim 2, wherein the
`vibration-suppressing layer terminates in both circumferen-
`tial directions with stop surfaces that limit the circumferen-
`tial motion of the bolts to a specific amount.
`5. The vibration dampener defined in claim 2, wherein
`each arc is formed by insert pieces.
`6. The vibration dampener defined in claim 5, wherein the
`insert pieces and the vibration-suppressing layers are com-
`ponents of insert parts accommodated tightly in recesses in
`at least one of the collar and the inertial masses.
`
`7. The vibration dampener defined in claim 6, wherein the
`material constituting the vibration-suppressing layers is con-
`nected to the recesses and insert pieces by direct molding
`and curing subsequent to introduction of the insert pieces
`into the recesses.
`
`8. The vibration dampener defined in claim 6, comprising
`a space between one of the inertial masses and collar and the
`insert pieces and wherein the space is occupied by the
`material of the vibration suppression layer, thereby forming
`a tolerance layer.
`9. The vibration dampener defined in claim 8, wherein the
`tolerance layer and the vibration-suppressing layers are
`integrated and merge into each other.
`10. The vibration dampener defined in claim 5, wherein
`the insert pieces are extruded.
`
`Valeo Exhibit 1112, pg. 5
`
`Valeo Exhibit 1112, pg. 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket