`By: Vincent J. Galluzzo, Reg. No. 67,830
`
`Teresa Stanek Rea, Reg. No. 30,427
`
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`
`1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`
`Tel: (202) 624-2781
`
`Email: vgalluzzo@crowell.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jonathan Stroud, Reg. No. 72,518
`Unified Patents Inc.
`1875 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Floor 10
`Washington, D.C. 20009
`Tel: (202) 805-8931
`Email: jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`IPR2017-00430 Request for Refund
`Patent 6,088,802
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Patent Owners
`
`IPR2017-00430
`Patent 6,088,802
`
`REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST-INSTITUTION FEE
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00430 Request for Refund
`Patent 6,088,802
`
`Unified Patents Inc. (“Unified” or “Petitioner”) hereby files its request for a
`
`refund of the $23,600 post-institution fee that was previously paid.
`
`On December 14, 2016, Petitioner filed a petition for inter partes review of
`
`U.S. Patent 6,088,802 and paid the USPTO a total of $36,400 at the time of filing
`
`this petition, which included a $23,600 payment for the post-institution fee
`
`required by 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.15(a)(1)–(4). The filed inter partes review petition
`
`was granted a filing date on January 11, 2017. (Paper 6). The Board subsequently
`
`denied institution of inter partes review on July 5, 2017. (Paper 8). The Board
`
`terminated the proceeding before institution of the inter partes review. The
`
`Petitioner is entitled to request a refund of the post-institution fee that was
`
`previously paid and is entitled to this refund. See, e.g., 78 Fed. Reg. 4233 (Jan. 18,
`
`2013); PTAB E2E Frequently Asked Questions E7.
`
`For at least the reasons set forth above, Unified files its request for a refund
`
`of the post-institution fee that was previously paid and hereby requests a refund of
`
`the $23,600 post-institution fee previously paid by Unified.
`
`The refund may be deposited in Deposit Account No. 50-6990 under
`
`reference “IPR2017-00430 (6,088,802)”.
`
`Therefore, Unified respectfully requests a refund of the post-institution fee
`
`for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent 6,088,802, IPR2017-00430.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Date: November 10, 2017
`
`IPR2017-00430 Request for Refund
`Patent 6,088,802
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Vincent J. Galluzzo/
`Vincent J. Galluzzo
`Registration No. 67,830
`
`Teresa Stanek Rea
`Registration No. 30,427
`
`Jonathan Stroud
`Registration No. 72,518
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00430 Request for Refund
`Patent 6,088,802
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on November 10, 2017, I caused a true and correct copy
`
`of the foregoing materials:
`
` Request for Refund of Post-Institution Fee
`
`to be served via e-mail on the following counsel of record for Patent Owner:
`
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (Reg. No. 68,504)
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`Peter Lambrianakos (Reg. No. 58,279)
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`212-209-4800
`
`
`/Vincent J. Galluzzo/
`Vincent J. Galluzzo
`
`
`
`i
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
