throbber
‘ CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`21-3 68
`
`. PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW
`
`MonoSol 1019—0001
`
`I
`
`MonoSol V. ICOS
`IPR2017-00412
`
`MonoSol 1019-0001
`
`MonoSol v. ICOS
`IPR2017-00412
`
`

`

`GENERAL PHARMA COLOGYfl'0X1COLOGY COVER SHEET
`
`NDA No: 21-368
`Sequence No: 000
`Information to sponsor: Yes (x) No ()
`Sponsor: Lilly ICOS LLC, Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285
`Manufacturer for drug substance: Eli Lilly & C0,, Tippecanoe Laboratories, Lafayette, IN 47909
`
`Review No: 1
`Date/type of submission: June 28, MOI/Original
`
`Reviewer: Yangmee Shin, Ph.D.
`Division: Division of Reproductive and Urologic Drug Products, HFD-580
`Review completion date:
`
`Drug:
`
`Trade name: Ciahs
`
`Generic name: Tadalafil
`
`Code name: IC351 (LY450190)
`Chemical name: Pyrazino[l’,2:’ l ,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-l ,4-dione, 6-(1,3—benzodioxol--S-yl)-
`2,3,6, 7, 12, lZa-hexahydro-Z-methylg (6R-12aR)~
`
`CAS registry No: 171596-29-5
`Molecular formula: CHH19N3O4
`Structure:
`
`Mole file No:
`Molecular weight: 389.41
`
`
`
`Relevant INDs/NDAs/DMFs: IND 54,553 .
`
`
`
`Drug class: B-carboline phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 5 inhibitor
`Indication: Erectile Dysfunction (ED)
`
`Clinical formulation: Yellow, film-coated, almond-shaped tablets containing 20 mg of tadalafil and
`inactive ingredients of lactose monohydrate, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose,
`iron oxide, croscarmellose sodium, sodium lauryl sulfate, microcrystalline cellulose, talc, titanium
`dioxide, triacetin & magnesium stearate.
`
`Route of administration: Oral
`
`Proposed clinical use: Treatment of erectile dysfunction
`
`Disclaimer: Tabular and graphical information isfrom sponsor 's submission unless stated otherwise.
`
`i
`
`MonoSol 1019-0002
`
`MonoSol 1019-0002
`
`

`

`Studies reviewed within this submission:
`
`’ “ '
`
`PHARMACOLOGY (#321422, #01 -0007-1 1, #OO-OOIO-I l, #00-0009—1 1)
`TOXICOKINETICS (#D01899, 277—.
`88780, #‘—’—~ 88779, ire—853016)
`TOXICOLOGY
`
`l-Year oral toxicity study in’beagle dogs (vol. 31, p l, #D01899)
`CARCINOGENICITY
`
`2-Year oral carcinogenicity study in CD-l mice (vol. 33, p l, k —‘ 88455)
`2-Year oral carcinogenicity study in 1-" Wistar rats (vol. 34, p 1, at; ——- 88203)
`REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
`
`Segment ll & III reproductive study in CD rats (vol. 37/38, p 1, # — -353010.—-.-353016)
`
`. Studies 101 reviewed within this submission (Appendix I):
`
`IND 54,553 Review #1, May 26, I998
`PHARMACOLOGY (#97-001-14, #97002-14, #97-003-14, #2— 94-007)
`SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY (#20215, #520996, #21011, #S20222, #97-004-14)
`PHARMACOKDETKB
`'
`
`Absorption (#1121 147, #D2] 148, #BPW662, #BPW64l/BPW659)
`Metabolism (#BPW549/BPW564, #BPW641/BPW659)
`Distribution (#BPW618)
`Protein binding (#BPW507, #BPW495)
`TOXICOKINETICS (#R20861, #R2 1236, #D21148, #D20786, #D20863, #D21235)
`TOXICOLOGY
`
`Acute toxicity (#M20798, #M20799, #M20977, #M20978, #R20796, #R20797, #1220979, #R20980)
`Repeated toxicity
`1. Maximum repeatable daily oral dosage study in the L“ Wistar Rat (#R20791)
`2.
`l-Month oral toxicity study in -- Wistar Rats (#1120861)
`3. Study to determine the maximum repeatable daily oral dosage in the beagle dog (#D20786)
`, 4.
`l-Month oral toxicity study in the beagle dog (#D20863)
`5. 6-Month oral toxicity study in the beagle dog (#D21235)
`GENETIC TOXICOLOGY
`
`l. Microbial mutagenicity study (#U20206)
`2. Mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase mammalian cell mutation study (#V21 166)
`3.
`In vitro cytogenetic evaluation in cultured human lymphocytes (#V209l8)
`4. WHO nitrosation assay (#U21004)
`
`IND 54.553 Review #2
`TOXIC OLOGY
`
`1. 6~Month oral toxicity study in the beagle dog (#D21235)
`
`IND 5*" Review #1, May 27, 1999
`PHARMACOKINETICS
`
`Metabolism (#1999IV-RSL05, #006R00)
`Excretion (#BPW549/BPW564)
`TOXICOKINETICS (#88270)
`TOXICOLOGY
`
`l. 3-Month oral pilling toxicity study with a 13-week recovery period in the Beagle dog (#88270)
`GENETIC TOXICOLOGY
`
`1. Micronucleus assay in bone marrow of male .- A Wistar Rats (#R20937)
`
`
`._I‘ID_:-'— Review #2 Jul 26 1999
`SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY (#PG9927)
`TOXICOKINETICS (#M04298, #Rl8498, #M04398, #3 -- 353004, #' —— 853005)
`TOXICOLOGY
`
`l.
`
`1- & 3-Month oral gavage toxicityin’CD-l mice (#M04298)
`
`MonoSol 1019-0003
`
`MonoSol 1019-0003
`
`

`

`REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
`l. Embryo/fetal development in CD-1 mice (#"‘ 353004)
`2. Embryo/fetal development in CD rats (#‘ _, ~353005)
`
`" "
`
`IND 54.553 Review #3, Aug 10, 1999
`PHARMACOLOGY (#98-0001~l 1, #98-0002-1 l, #98-0003-1 l)
`PHARMACOKJNETICS (#132R98, #R14998, #M04198, ADME#6, ADME#7)
`TOXICOKINETICS (#r" 88440, #21236)
`TOXICOLOGY
`
`1. 3-Month oral gavage toxicity in CD-l mice (#88437)
`2. 6-Month oral gavage toxicity in —-— Wistar rats (#21236)
`REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
`
`1. Oral gavage fertility study in CD rats (#96364)
`JUSTIFICATION FOR 2-YEAR CARCINOGENICITY STUDY DOSE SELECTIONS IN RATS & MICE
`
`IND i r——' Rew‘ew #3, Sep 3, 1999
`PHARMACOLOGY (#PR9902)
`PHARMACOKINETICS (#B00199, #R18498)'
`TOXICOKINETICS (#R18498, }.~——88632)
`TOXICOLOGY
`
`1. 3-Month oral gavage in Fisher 344 rats (#R18498)
`2. 6-Month oral pilling toxicity study with a 3—month recovery period in the Beagle dog (‘r ,— 88632)
`SPECIAL TOXICOLOGY
`
`1.
`
`In vitro ocular irritation-agar diffusion cytolysis & aqueous pH in cultured rabbit comea cells (#990416ADC)
`
`
`m ——’- Review #4 Dec 27 I999
`PHARMACOLOGY (#PR9902)
`SPECIAL TOXICOLOGY
`
`1.
`2.
`
`In vivo eye irritation study in New Zealand White rabbits (#SL13 130.495)
`In vivo acute dermal toxicity in New Zealand White rabbits (#SLI3130.487)
`
`IND .’ Review #5, Aug 15, 2000
`PHARMACOLOGY (#1999lV-EIOO4, #PR9906, #99-0005-11)
`PHARMACOKINETICS
`
`Distribution (#003R00)
`Metabolism (#1999IV-SF038)
`Excretion (#078R99, #002R00)
`Repeat Dose in Monkeys (i —“ 88548)
`
`Introduction and drug history: IC351 is a potent, competitive and reversible inhibitor of cGMP
`specific PDE type .5 for an indication of ED under IND 54,553. It is also currently being investigated for
`-——- under IND 1 ~_ Major toxicities are irreversible seminiferous testicular atrophy and vasculitis in
`dogs. The original submission by lCOS Corporation was placed on clinical hold because of vasculitis
`findings in dogs and the high daily clinical dose up to 100 mg.
`
`MonoSol 1019-0004
`
`iii
`
`MonoSol 1019-0004
`
`

`

`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY "
`
`“m.
`
`1.
`
`Recommendations
`
`7
`
`,,
`
`A. Recommendation on Approvability: The preclinical studies conducted support the safety
`of the proposed dose of 20 mg of Cialis.
`
`II.
`
`B. Recommendation for Nonclinical Studies: The 2—year carcinogenicity studies in male rats,
`and male and female mice were conducted at doses below those recommended by the ICH
`guidelines (see Exectutive CAC minutes in appendex 1]) based on the AUC exposures for the 20
`mg human dose. The Committee recommended an additional alternative mouse carcinogenicity
`assay be conducted for Phase IV commitment unless the sponsor provided evidence for
`saturation of absorption by measuring either total radioactivity or metabolites.
`
`C. Recommendations on Labeling: Refer to the labeling comments.
`
`Summary of Nonclinical Findings
`A. Brief Overview of Nonclinical Findings: EffectiVe antihypertensive oral doses of
`IC351 were 1 mg/kg in the rat. Reduction in mean blood pressure occurred at doses from 20
`mg/kg without effects on heart/respiration rate in conscious dogs, but moderate tachycardia was
`seen in a dog (1/2) at 30 mg/kg and in both dogs at 100 mg/kg in another study. The
`cardiovascular effects were not observed in the repeated toxicity studies. IC351 potentiated atrial
`natriuretic factor (ANF)~induced diuresis and natn'uresis in rats at lower doses (0.1 mg/kg, iv.)
`than those required for decreasing blood pressure. Slight-to~moderate ptosis and depression of
`the pinnal reflex were observed in rats given 200 mg/kg. IC351 did not cause death up to 2,000
`mg/kg (p.o.) in mice and rats in acute studies. Like other PDES inhibitors, the major findings of
`IC351 treatment in repeated dose studies are arteritis and testicular degeneration/anophy
`observed in multiple species. IC351 was not genotoxic and the carcinogenicity studies were
`negative although hepatocellular adenomas/carcinomas were observed with increased frequency
`in high dose male mice and rats. Reproductive and developmental studies: in mice and rats
`displayed no adverse effects on fertility at doses up to 1,000 mg/kg. Mice: were used for a second
`rodent species of embryo/fetal development studies since plasma exposure for rabbits was
`minimal. A NOAEL for maternal toxicity was established at 1,000 mg/kg; in mice and 200 mg/kg
`in rats (based on reduced body weight gain). A NOAEL for F1 developmental toxicity in the rat
`could not be identified due to significantly reduced postnatal survival in all dose groups from the
`combined segment 11/11] study. Sponsor defined a NOAEL of 30 mg/kg from a subsequent study,
`which gives 9-fold exposure for the unbound parent drug (pregnant rat) to the human exposure at
`20 mg. IC351 is a mild ocular and dermal irritant in New Zealand White rabbits.
`
`B. Pharm acologic Activity: IC351 is a potent and selective inhibitor of PDES among the PDEs
`tested in vi’tro. PDES is a major cGMP-hydrolyzing enzyme in human cavemosal smooth muscle,
`and theinhibition of PDES by IC351 enhances relaxant effects of NO by stimulating cGMP
`levels. This leads to relaxation of penile resistance arteries and the smooth muscle to enhance the
`erectile response. IC351 strongly potentiated the inhibitory effects of sodium nitroprusside (SNP)
`on human platelet aggregation with complete inhibition at 0.25 M, and on increased cGMP
`levels in human cavemosal smooth muscle, suggesting that the PDES inhibition by IC351 may
`lead to large increases in cGMP levels once activated. IC351 retains relatively low selectivity for
`PDES vs. human PDEl 1A (abstract from Am. Coll. Clin. Pharmacol., VA, 2001), which was
`widely expressed in kidney, liver, pituitary/salivary glands and testis (PNAS 97: 3702, 2000).
`Thus, pharmacological characterization of IC351 on human PDEl 1A may provide additional
`information on the mechanism of IC351.
`
`.
`
`iv
`
`MonoSol 1019-0005
`
`MonoSol 1019-0005
`
`

`

`C. Nonclinical Safety Issues Relevant to Clinical Use:
`1.
`Testicular degeneration/atrophy were observed with increased incidence in the 3-month
`toxicity study and the carconogenicity study in mice and in the 3-, 6- and 12-month toxicity
`studies in dogs with no/low safety margin at a NOAEL compared to the proposed human dose of
`20 mg. The findings are likely to be irreversible since the incidence was observed during the
`recovery in the 3- and 6-month dog studies. In men, there were no clinically significant effects on
`semen parameters up to 6 months with a clinical dose of 20 mg (#H6D—MC-LVCZ).
`
`Vasculitis findings should be interpreted cautiously since the relevance to humans and the
`2.
`pathogenic mechanism of drug-related vascular lesions in animals are poorly understood, and the
`specific biomarkers are not identified. IC351 treatment increased the incidence of vasculitis in
`mice, rats and dogs but the effects varied considerably between studies. In a 13-week study in
`mice, there was hemorrhage in mesenteric lymph nodes in the high dose group (400 mg/kg,
`approximately 9 times the maximum human exposure of unbound drug). In another 3-month
`study, there was minimal vasculitis in the high dose group receiving 800 mg/kg (7 times the
`maximum human exposure; exposure estimates varied between and within studies). In Wistar rats,
`vasculitis occurred in a number of tissues with slight/minimal severity. In general, the incidence
`was only slightly higher in treated groups than in controls. These effects were seen at exposures
`anywhere from 2X (mesenteric phlebitis) to 33X the maximum human exposure. In dogs, findings
`of arteritis occurred in l and 6 month studies. Effects included perivascular inflammation in the '
`lungs, increased incidence of coronary arterial lesions and marked disseminated arteritis. These
`findings occurred in the absence of elevated heart rate and resulted in the drug being placed on
`clinical hold. The study pathologist, \ *— concluded "the high incidence of arteritis that has
`been associated with high doses of IC351 in the 6-month dog study, and the predominance of
`arterial changes in the mid- and high-dose groups in the 1-month study are strongly suggestive of
`a treatment related change or treatment related exacerbation of the spontaneous polyarteritis". In
`general, drug effects were seen at exposures between 5 and 16 fold in the: 1-month study, and
`between 29 and 54 times in the 6-month study (as measured by mean AUC of unbound drug) the
`maximum human exposure. Due to the concerns about vasculitis, the Division requested a 12-
`month toxicology study in dogs. This study was essentially negative at exposures of 3-33 times
`the maximum human exposure but there was marked neun'openia/thrombocytopenia indicative of
`type III immunopathy in two dogs (exposures 14 and 18X human exposure). The high dose dog
`did have perivasculitis in the circumflex branch of the left coronary artery with clinical signs of
`fever, anorexia and lethargy. In humans, symptoms of hypersensitivity such as myalgia, infection
`and back pain were the most frequently reported adverse events associated with IC351. The
`sponsor concluded that neither back pain nor myalgia was associated with inflammatory or
`myopathic etiologies based on a clinical study, which measured erythrocyte sedimentation rate
`and serum creatinine kinase.
`
`In dogs, direct measurements of artErial diameter, vascular resistance or blood flow were not
`conducted to determine if exaggerated hemodynamic effects were associated with the vasculitis
`(clinical data indicate that combined treatment with antihypertensive drugs generally reduced the
`episode of myalgia and backpain). In the safety pharmacology studies, moderate tachycardia (40.
`60 bpm) was observed in dogs at doses 230 mg/kg (1/2 at 30 mg/kg & 2/2 at 100 mg/kg). The -
`effective antihypertensive dose in rats is 1 mg/kg, po. In conscious dogs, single oral doses of 20
`and 200 mg/kg produced slight reductions in mean blood pressure without effects on heart rate or
`respiration rate. In the 1-month study (D20863), the high dose produced a moderate decrease in
`heart rate with some vasculitis in the lung, spinal cord and thymus. In a 6-month study (D21235),
`there were no drug—related changes in ECG but there was increased incidence and severity of
`arteritis with clinical signs in the high dose dogs. It seems that IC351 can induce vascular changes
`in the absence of any significant effect on cardiac function.
`
`MonoSol 1019-0006
`
`MonoSol 1019-0006
`
`

`

`In dogs with drug blood levels below approximately 29 times the human exposure, vascular
`effects, if any, were minimal to slight. In one 28-day study, D20863, there were positive effects
`(perivascular inflammation in the lungs in 3/6 dogs vs. 0/6 in controls) at: approximately the same
`exposure as men taking 20 mg. In the lZ-month study, exposures at the high dose were up to 33
`times the human exposure to free drug with essentially negative effects. lit is not known if humans
`are more or less sensitive to this effect than animals.
`
`.
`
`Although the data are not particularly convincing that the finding in animals is relevant to
`humans, hypersensitivity is the major manifestation of clinical drug-induced vasculitis. There
`were two dogs with symptoms of marked thrombocytopenia (14 and 18X the human exposure)
`indicative of type III immunopathy in the 12-month dog study and symptoms of back pain and
`myalgia as the most frequent adverse effects in men. Thus, it would seem to be prudent to include.
`in the label some information on vasculitis in animals.
`
`III.
`
`Administrative
`
`A. Reviewer signature:
`
`B. Supervisor signature:
`
`Concurrence -
`
`Non-Concurrence -
`
`(see memo attached)
`
`C. Cc: NDA 21-368
`
`HFD-SBO/D. Spell-LeSane, M. Hirsch, A. Batra, G. Benson, M.-J. Ng, D. Hoberman,
`8. Roy, V. Jarugula, A. Parekh, M. Rhee, R. Agarwal, Y. Shin, A. Jordan
`HIFD-S lO/J. El-Hage, K. Davis-Bruno
`
`MonoSol 1019-0007
`
`MonoSol 1019-0007
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS - PHARJIA COL 06WT0X16bLOGY REVIEW
`
`I.
`
`PHARMACOLOGY: ...........7..........................................................................._............................. I
`
`II.
`
`SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY: ................................................................................................ 1
`
`III. PHARMACOIGI‘IETICSNOMCOIGNETICS: 2................................................................. 1
`
`IV. GENERAL TOXICOLOGY: .......................................................................................... 2
`
`v. GENETIC TOXICOLOGY: ...........................................................................................9
`
`VI. CARCINOGENIcm:.................................................................................................... 10
`
`REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY: ................................. 25
`VII.
`VIII. SPECIAL TOXICOLOGY STUDIES: ......................................................................... 29
`
`1X. DETAILED CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: ............................................. 30
`
`x. APPENDIX/ATTACHMENTS: ............................................................................................ 35
`
`MonOSOl 1019-0008
`
`vii
`
`MonoSol 1019-0008
`
`

`

`Reviewer:
`
`______________—____________.__flD__N&
`
`PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGYREVIEW
`
`I. PHARMACOLOGY (see Reviews #1/3/4 for IND 54,553
`
`~——————-——————-«+
`
`Primary pharmacodynamics:
`Mechanism of action: IC351 inhibits PDES, a major cGMP-hydrolyzing enzyme in human
`cavemosal smooth muscle, and enhances relaxant effects of NC by stimulating cGMP levels. This leads
`to relaxation of penile resistance arteries and cavemosal trabecular smooth muscle (#00-0010-11). »
`Drug activity related to proposed indication: IC351 enhances the erectile response by smooth
`muscle relaxation and inflow of blood into the penile tissues.
`
`i Secondary pharmacodynamics: IC351 had no direct effect on human platelet aggregation but markedly
`potentiated the anti-aggregatory effect of soluble guanylyl cyclase activator sodium nitroprusside (SN?)
`in a dose-dependent manner (#97-002-14).
`
`Pharmacology summary: IC351 is a potent inhibitor of PDES among 10 PDEs (700- to 49,000-fold) in
`vitro (#00-0006-11). IC351 displays >l0,000-fold selectivity for PDES against PEDESA found in cardiac
`myocytes and 700-fold selectivity against PDE6 in photoreceptor. PDES was not present in human
`cardiac myocytes (#00-0009-11). The intermediate derivatives of IC351 (catechol and methylcatechol)
`and the methylcatechol glucuronide metabolite were 45- and 230-fold less potent than IC351 with some
`selectivity for PDES. The major circulating metabolite in human plasma and urine, methylcatechol
`glucuronide, displays 13,000-fold less potency than IC351 as a PDES inhibitor, but does not show
`selectivity. Sponsor stated that methylcatechol glucuronide would not have clinically significant effects
`on any of the human PDEs at concentrations achieved in human plasma following efficacious oral doses
`(11101410074 1).
`
`Pharmacology conclusions: IC351 strongly potentiated the inhibitory effects of SN? on human platelet
`aggregation with complete inhibition at 0.25 1.1M, and increased cGMP levels in the presence of SN? in
`human cavemosal smooth muscle, suggesting that the PDES inhibition by IC351 may lead to large
`increases in cGMP levels once activated.
`
`II. SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY (see Reviews #1 for IND 54,553 ‘ M
`
`
`
`Safety pharmacology summary: IC351 produced emesis/tachycardia at 230 mg/kg (po) in conscious
`dogs (1/2 at 30 mg/kg and 2/2 at 100 mg/kg) and ptosis/depression of the pinnal reflex at 200Img/kgin
`rats. Decrease1n mean arterial blood pressure was observed at 21 111ng (p.o.)1n
`hypertensive/nonnotensive rats and 220 mg/kg (p.o. )1n conscious dogs. IC351 at cumulative i.v. doses of
`0.1 to 3 mg/kg produced dose-dependent decreases in blood pressure in anesthetized dogs secondary to
`decreased vascular resistance. Administration of IC351 to conscious guinea pigs at an oral dose of 400
`mg/kg produced significant reduction in heart rate and progressive bradycardia, concurrent with
`deteriorating clinical signs and weight loss resulting in death (#821422). IC351 potentiated ANF-induced
`diuresis and natriuresis in rats at 0.1 mg/kg (i.v.). IC351 had affinity for the D2 receptor at 1 11M.
`
`Safety pharmacology conclusions: The effective antihypertensive oral doses of IC351 were 1 mg/kgin
`the rat and 20 mg/kgin conscious dogs.
`
`
`
`III. PHARMACOKINETICS (see Reviews #1/3/4 for IND 54,553
`
`PK parameters: PK of IC351 are linear with respect to time and dose in healthy subjects or in patients
`with ED. Exposure (AUC) increased proportionally over a dose range of 2.5- to 210 mg. Cm was
`
`MonoSol 1019-0009
`
`MonoSol 1019-0009
`
`

`

`Reviewer:
`
`__________________________IN_2_N&
`
`achieved at a median time of 2 hrs afier dosing. Steadystate plasma cohcentrations were attained by Day
`5 with doses of 10- or 20 mg/day with a tm of 17.5 hours.
`
`Absorption: Absorption of IC35 1 is generally rapid in rats and dogs with Tmax of 1 to 2 hours and 6
`hours with oral administration of 10 mg/kg [”C]-IC35 1, respectively. Repeated oral dosing caused a
`variable and prolonged Téu, suggesting the possibility of absorption in the lower intestinal tract. Oral
`bioavailability at 10 mg/kg was 34-53% in rats and 10-18% in dogs. Plasma half-life afier oral
`administration in rats and dogs could not be calculated due to the limited number of data points and a
`prolonged absorptive phase.
`
`Distribution: An oral dose of [”C]IC351 (10 mg/kg) to rats revealed the highest concentrations of
`radioactivity in the stomach, GI tract, thyroid and lung. By 168 hrs after dosing, radioactive drug-related
`material was not detected in any tissues except for the liver. Exposure to pregnant rats on gestation Day
`18 caused the highest concentrations of radioactivity in maternal adrenal gland, preputial gland and liver
`at 8 hours post-dose. Parent and/or metabolites of IC35] were detected in the matemal placenta, and
`fetal adrenal gland, blood, brain, eye, kidney, liver & myocardium with substantially low exposure at 8
`hours post-dose, indicating the placental transfer.
`
`Metabolism: IC351 is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 in human liver. Unchanged IC351
`accounted for 26% in human plasma, indicating an extensive metabolism. In human feces, the majority of
`the radioactivity was associated with metabolites after 24 hours. In human, dog and mouse liver slices,
`the major metabolite was the methylcatechol glucuronide. Catechol glucuronide was the most abundant
`metabolite in rat liver.
`
`Excretion: Major route of elimination of a radiolabled dose (100 mg) was the feces with 61% and urine
`with 36% in human by 13 days. Elimination of radioactivity in feces at a single dose of 10 mg/kg was
`98% in rats, 84% in male dogs and 63% in female dogs. Only 50.1% of administered IC351 is excreted
`in maternal milk over a 3 to 24 hour period, suggesting that maternal milk is not a major route of
`elimination for IC35] and metabolites.
`
`Protein binding: In vitro plasma protein binding to mouse, rat, dog and human was determined to be
`85%, 92%, 87% and 94%, respectively.
`
`PK/TK summary: Plasma concentrations generally increased sub-proportionally to the increased dose
`in mice, rats and dogs. Exposure was higher after 1 to 3 months in rats and dogs, suggesting
`accumulation in the plasma. The plasma exposure in pregnant rats following daily oral dosing fi'om
`gestation Days 6 through 12 was also less than proportional to dose over the range of 60 to 1000 mg/kg
`with Trm of 4 to 1.2 hours. The only gender difference was a higher exposure in female rats, and is not
`marked in humans.
`
`Summa
`
`of AUC 0.24.. in Subchronic- and Chronic Studies for Mice, Rats and Do - s
`
`W-_uration Dose, mg/kg
`Mouse
`CTBR88440
`
`3 Months Day_90
`
`AUCwmw ngb/mL
`13390
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(CD-l)
`
`
`
`M04398
`
`3 Months
`
`Day 90
`
`400
`
`
`26275
`19"01
`
`26860
`27152
`
`
`
`'
`
`CTBR88780
`
`6 Months
`Day 180
`
`Carcinoaemci
`
`
`800
`
`MonoSol 1019-0010
`
`MonoSol 1019-0010
`
`

`

`Reviewer:
`
`— _—- ‘ 31223“
`Rat
`R20861
`1 Month
`Day 27
`10
`13280‘
`(Wistar)
`60
`54120e
`400
`83910°
`
`60
`100
`400
`800
`10
`60
`400
`
`10
`60
`180
`
`10
`45
`200
`
`10
`60
`200
`
`10
`60
`200
`400
`
`10
`60
`400
`
`29427
`21221
`49951
`41649
`14900'
`29100e
`72200‘
`
`16070
`38604
`78863
`
`2565-14553
`11907-21669
`35629-74920
`
`NCZ-6882
`13370-25863
`13007-62645
`31384-91270
`
`4350-43200
`13100-1 19000
`683 00-1 79000
`
`5060-1 1100
`6750-7420
`209000230000
`
`2390-4160
`1 5300-33200
`13 1000— l 3 8000
`
`IND No.
`
`20962
`25010e
`743206
`159600e
`
`46354
`51802
`126171
`77182
`28200‘
`82900e
`190000e
`
`35899
`91 106
`152863
`
`~
`-
`-
`
`NC-6202
`1 1424-44885
`16983-5500]
`41786-129341
`
`4960-26900
`36600-98600
`44300-261000
`
`8792-68012
`39276-158317
`28936-109961
`-
`
`Rl8498-
`(Fisher)
`
`
`
`CTBR88779
`
`Day 90
`
`3 Months
`,
`
`_
`
`6 Months
`
`Day 168/169
`
`6 Months
`(carcinogenicity)
`
`Day 180
`
`Dog
`(beagle)
`
`D20863
`
`1 Month
`
`Day 28
`
`88270
`
`3 Months
`
`Day 91
`
`CTBR88632
`
`6 Months
`
`Day 176
`
`D21235
`
`6 Months
`
`Day 182/183
`
`
`
`D01899
`
`1 Year
`
`Day 364
`
`25
`8576-43136
`100
`12122-62109
`v
`400
`16900-77350
`Human ——— 7692
`'AUCmm), bAUCmswf-Aucmsm dAUCum. eAUCu-m.)
`
`PK/TK conclusions: Metabolism was the primary mechanism for clearance of 113351 fi'om the systemic
`circulation with similar routes of biotransformation in mice, rats, dogs and humans. The major route of
`excretion was via the feces in both rats and dogs, indicating incomplete oral absorption and biliary
`excretion of metabolites. Slight- to moderate increases in hepatic enzyme activity and/or CYP450 content
`were observed in mice, rats and dogs after oral doses of 2400 mg/kg, indicating 1C351 as a inducer of
`CYP450 isoenzymes.
`
`IV. TOXICOLOGY (see Reviews #1/2/3 for IND 54,553
`
`
`
`Study title: l-Year Oral Toxicity Study in Beagle Dogs
`
`Key study findings: Testicular degeneration/atrophy was observed with deceased sperm in the
`epididymides at all treatment groups with increased severity following 12 months. Neutropenia,
`thrombocytopenia and/or anemia were observed in the mid- and high dose females (US each
`group).
`
`Study no: D01899
`Conducting laboratory: Eli Lilly & Company, Greenfield, IN 46140
`Date of study initiation: June 19, 1999
`QA report: yes (x) no (
`)
`% purity: 100.1%
`Drug/lot #: 1C351 (LY450190)/991020
`Formulation/vehicle: Gelatin capsule/1%(w1v) carboxymethylcellulose sodium & 0.5% sodium lauryl sulfate in purified water
`
`Volume #, and page #: vol. 3]
`.
`GLP compliance: Yes
`
`3
`
`MonoSol 1019-0011
`
`MonoSol 1019-0011
`
`

`

`Reviewer:
`
`Dosing:
`
`1ND No.
`
`Species/strain: Beagle dog
`#lsex/group or time point (main study): 5/sex/group
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics or recovery: no recovery studied
`Weight: 9.0 to 12.9 kg for males & 7.3 to 9.9 kg for females
`
`Age: 14 to 15 months
`
`Doses in administered units: 0, 25, 100 & 400 mg/kg/day
`Route, form, volume, and infusion rate: Oral suspension of 0, 12.5, 50.0 & 200.0 mg/ml. in capsules
`Observations and times:
`
`lmflflflMflIIIIIIIIIIIII'Nmn
`More than once dail
`Twice dail
`--re-stu base/Once weekl
`
`rust-dose -hase
`
`M Pretreatment & terminal examination
`Scheduled necro n Da
`365 & 366
`Da -7/re-dose & 2 hrs est-dose on Da
`
`180 & 362
`
`
`
`Twice daily pre-st‘udy phase/Months l, 3, 6., 9 a 12 for fasted
`
`Months 5, 8, 10, ll & 12 for non-fasted
`
`0,1.2,4,8.12,16& 24 hrs on Days 0.33.177 & 364
`
`
`
`Results: Treatment was suspended for one 100- & one 400 mg/kg female dogs between Days 140 and
`166 & from Days 196 through the end of the study due to marked neutropenia (1,610/1,11. for 100 mg/kg
`& 3 lO/uL for 400 mg/kg compared to reference 3,300 to 11,600/uL) with moderate thrombocytopenia
`(90,000/uL for 100 mg/kg & 226,000/uL for 400 mg/kg compared to reference levels of 191,000 to
`442,000/uL), which was initially identified on Day 91. Severe neutropenia (170/uL), moderately
`decreased platelets (1] LOGO/111.), hyperglobulinemia, minimal anemia, minimal eosinopenia and IALP
`in the absence of clinical signs were present in the 100 mg/kg dog on Day 140. The other blood
`dyscrasias included minimal monocytopenia, lymphopenia & eosinopenia in both dogs, which the
`sponsor considered to be due to stress. Clinical signs of fever (105.4 °F), anorexia & lethargy followed by
`minimal neutropenia (2,930/uL), anemia, severe monocytosis & slight hyperglobulinemia compatible
`with inflammation occurred in the 400 mg/kg dog on Day 128. Abdominal radiographs taken on Days
`128 & 288 excluded an occult inflammatory focus or splenic enlargement. Antibiotic therapy was
`initiated on Day 128 due to signs of inflammation (Ibasophilia/Dohle bodies). After removal from
`antibiotics on Day 138, clinical signs returned to normal with severe neutropenia (ZOO/til.) & neutrophil
`alterations. The dog became febrile & developed neck pain/inappetence on Day 14] despite the
`reinstatement of antibiotic on Day 139. Additional aspirin & antibiotics were administered on Days 146
`through 154. Following drug removal (& antibiotic & supportive therapy in the 400 mg/kg) on Days 140
`(400 mg/kg) & 142 (100 mg/kg), dosing resumed on Days 161 (400 mg/kg) & 166 (100 mg/kg). Marked
`neutropenia (1,130/ttL for 100 mg/kg & l,210/p.L for 400 mg/kg) and/or minimal thrombocytopenia
`developed within 8 days in the 400 mg/kg or within 10 days in the 100 mg/kg dog. These dogs were
`clinically asymptomatic until Days 195 when the 400 mg/kg dog developed clinical signs of
`stiffiiess/neck pain/anorexia, neutrophilia (10,250/uL), monocytosis & hyperglobulinemia
`Discontinuation of 1C351 on Day 196 rerurrfed the neutrophil (Day 204 for 100 mg/kg & Dat 196 for 400
`mg/kg) and/or platelet counts (Day 208 for 100 mg/kg) within the reference interval & without clinical
`signs. Bone marrow aspirates and core biopsies from humerus taken from these 2 dogs on Day 196
`demonstrated no abnormalities but increased numbers of immature neutrophilic precursors and
`myeloid/megakaryocytic hyperplasia, which were less pronounced on Days 231 (100 mg/kg) or 285 (400
`mg/kg) and absent on Day 366. Sponsor considered the findings to be idiosyncratic and not a result of a
`direct compound—related effect on early neutrophi] precursors or on bone marrow. The high-dose female
`had a single focus of per-ivasculitis in the circumflex branch of the left coronary artery. The 100 rug/kg
`dog showed a pituitary neuroblastoma, which was considered to be spontaneous.
`
`Drug-related degeneration & atrophy of the seminiferous epithelium occurred in dogs at 225 mg/kg with
`decreases in testicular weight & gross fmdings of small/sofi testes. Degeneration. of the seminiferous
`
`4
`
`MonoSol 1019-0012
`
`MonoSol 1019-0012
`
`

`

`Reviewer:
`
`'
`
`l’ND No.
`
`epithelium was characterized by disassociation or vacuolation of seminiferous epithelium, mutinucleated
`cells, exfoliated germ cells, pyknotic sperrnatids, megalospermatids, attenuation or loss of cell layers,
`and/or increase in Leydig cells. Low numbers of tubules also had markedly enlarged cells of
`spermatogonia with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm & round nuclei with rarefaction of the chromatin.
`Scattered tubules had individual cell necrosis of the mitotic spermatocytes and/or elongating sperrnatids.
`Atrophy of the seminiferous epithelium was characterized by seminiferous tubules lined by only Sertoli
`cells and/or spermatogonia. Degeneration and atrophy were more pronounced in the periphery of the
`affected testes. These testes were decreased overall in diameter with obliteration of the lumen or
`
`’
`
`attenuation of the epithelium with increased intraluminal space compared to controls Aspermia were
`also noted, which was considered secondary to decreased testicular sperm production.
`
`
`Dose,m
`
`E-idid
`ides wei-ht (_), absolute
`
`Testes, small
`
`
`Testicular seminifcrous epithelium
`
`Bilateral degeneration
`
`
`1 moderate
` 3 severe
`
`
`
`
`l marked
`
`1 minimal
`
`
`
`
`2 severe
`2 sli
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 minimal
`
`
`
`Significantly different from control a! p50.05
`
`Bilateral atrophy
`
`
`Epididymis
`Bilateral asperrnia
`Bilateral multifocal e-ithelial vacuolation
`
`
`
`l minimal
`
`sli_ t
`
`2 2
`
`Table below summarizes the results for the rest of the animals except the 2 female dogs with marked
`, neutropenia. No drug-related arteritis lesions occurred in the present study, due perhaps to lower blood
`. drug levels or different dog colony .
`_,__..
`No drug-related mortality was observed.
`Abnormal feces were more fi'equently observed in all treated groups. There was dose-dependent decrease
`in mean body weight in females, which was observed by 6 weeks after study initiation, & maintained
`without additional changes. WBC parameters of reticulocytes, neutrophils and monocytes were decreased
`from mid dose. IC351 produced slight dose-dependent increases in CYP450 content in males with
`increased liver weight. Increased adrenal weight was observed with enlarged/mutifocal agonal
`hemorrhage a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket