throbber
Microelectronics
`Processing
`
` Ex.1010 p.1
`Ex.1010 p.1
`
`

`
`ADV AN C ES
`
`I N CH E M I ST RY SE R I ES 221
`
`Microelectronics Processing
`Chemical Engineering Aspects
`
`Dennis W. Hess, EDITOR
`University of California- Berkeley
`
`Klavs F. Jensen, EDITOR
`University of Minnesota
`
`American Chemical Society, Washington, DC 1989
`
` Ex.1010 p.2
`
`

`
`• Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`
`Microelectronics Processing: Chemical Engineering Aspects
`Dennis W. Hess, editor, Klavs F. Jensen, editor
`cm.-(Advances in chemistry series, ISSN 0065-2393; 221)
`p.
`Bibliography: p.
`Includes index.
`ISBN 0- 8412-1475- 1
`l. Microelectronics-Materials. 2. Integrated
`Circuits- Design and Construction. 3. Surface Chemistry.
`I. Hess, Dennis W.
`II. Jensen, Klavs F., 1952-
`III. Series
`TK7874. M4835 1989
`621.381- dcl9
`
`89-6862
`CIP
`
`Copyright © 1989
`American Chemical Society
`All Rights Reserved. The appearance of the code at the bottom of the first page of each chapter
`in this volume indicates the copyright owner's consent that reprographic copies of the chapter
`may be made for personal or internal use or for the personal or internal use of specific clients.
`This consent is given on the condition, however, that the copier pay the stated per-copy fee
`through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 27 Congress Street, Salem, MA 01970, for
`copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law. This consent
`does not extend to copying or transmission by any means-graphic or electronic-
`for any other
`purpose, such as for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating
`a new collective work, for resale, or for information storage and retrieval systems. The copying
`fee for each chapter is indicated in the code at the bottom of the first page of the chapter.
`The citation of trade names and/ or names of manufacturers in this publication is not to be
`construed as an endorsement or as approval by ACS of the commercial products or services
`referenced herein; nor should the mere reference herein to any drawing, specification, chemical
`process, or other data be regarded as a license or as a conveyance of any right or permission
`to the holder, reader, or any other person or corporation, to manufacture, reproduce, use, or
`sell any patented invention or copyrighted work that may in any way be related thereto.
`Registered names, trademarks, etc., used in this publication, even without specific indication
`thereof, are not to be considered unprotected by law.
`
`PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`
` Ex.1010 p.3
`
`

`
`CONTENTS
`
`Pref ace ....................................................................... xiii
`
`1. Microelectronics Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
`Dennis W. Hess and Klavs F. Jensen
`
`2. Theory of Transport Processes in Semiconductor
`Crystal Growth from the Melt ........................................... 35
`Robert A. Brown
`
`3. Liquid-Phase Epitaxy and Phase Diagrams
`of Compound Semiconductors ................ . .......................... 105
`Timothy J. Anderson
`
`4. Physical Vapor Deposition Reactors ...................... . . .. ........... 171
`T. W. Fraser Russell, Bill N. Baron, Scott C. Jackson,
`and Richard E. Rocheleau
`
`5. Chemical Vapor Deposition .................. . ..................... . .... 199
`Klavs F. Jensen
`
`6. Diffusion and Oxidation of Silicon ....................................... 265
`Richard B. Fair
`
`7. Resists in Microlithography ... .. ............. . .......................... 325
`Michael J. O'Brien and David S. Soane
`
`8. Plasma-Enhanced Etching and Deposition ............................... 377
`Dennis W. Hess and David B. Graves
`
`9. Interconnection and Packaging of High-Performance
`Integrated Circuits ...................................................... 441
`Ronald J. Jensen
`
`10. Semiconductor Processing Problems Solved by Wet
`(Solution) Chemistry ..... .. ..................... ... .. . .................. 505
`Marjorie K. Balazs
`
`INDEXES
`
`Author Index . .............. .... .... . ............... ....... ....... . . . . 523
`Affiliation Index .......... . ........................................... 523
`
`Subject Index ................................................ .. ...... 523
`
`xi
`
` Ex.1010 p.4
`
`

`
`362
`
`MICHOELECTRONICS PROCESSING: CHEMJCAL ENGINEERING ASPEC.."'TS
`
`Resist Stripping. After the additive or subtractive processes of the
`substrate are complete, the resist mask must be completely removed by
`either wet or dry etching. The selection of resist stripper is determined by
`previous resist history (bakes, exposure to plasma, etc.) that results in chem(cid:173)
`ical alteration and by the underlying substrate stability (176). Wet etches
`are eiither solvent-based or inorganic reagents such as H 2S0 4 , HN0 3 or
`H 20 2• Solvent-type strippers are typically acetone for positive resists, trich(cid:173)
`loroethylene for negative resists, or commercial products developed to re(cid:173)
`move both types of resists. Commercial organic strippers were initially
`phenol-based solvents but have been manufactured recently with little or
`no phenol as a result of health and safety issues associated with the use of
`this chemical. Plasma stripping or ashing of resist with either 0 2 or O z-CF 4
`gases is clearly the method of choice from the standpoint of convenience,
`cost, and safety. However, the method cannot be used with substrates that
`are etched by these plasmas.
`
`Auxiliary Process Steps.
`In addition to the standard process steps,
`auxiliary processes are sometimes necessary. These steps are not used for
`all situations but as required and will be considered in this section separately.
`Certain semiconductor-manufacturing processes are particularly damaging
`to polymeric films and require an additional step to harden the resist. For
`example, Al etching with chlorine plasma produces A1Cl3, which degrades
`resists. Ion implantation, in which the chamber temperature and, hence,
`the wafer temperature increase with increasing implant dose, causes thermal
`deformation of the resist image. One commonly used method to stabilize
`novolac-based resists is deep-UV flood exposure after patterning (171). With
`deep-UV exposure, cross-linking of the polymer surface produces a film with
`increased thermal resistance. With this procedure, positive resists can with(cid:173)
`stand a 180 °C bake for 30 min. Fluorocarbon plasma treatment also stabilizes
`resists (178), because fluorine insertion impedes subsequent oxidation of the
`polymers.
`As discussed previously, an optional postexposure, predevelopment
`bake can reduce problems with the standing-wave effect in DNQ-novolac
`positive resists. However, such a postexposure bake step is indispensable
`in the image reversal of positive resists (37-41) and certain resists based on
`chemical amplification of a photogenerated catalyst (64-67, 77, 78). For both
`types of resists, the chemistry that differentiates between exposed and unex(cid:173)
`posed areas does not occur solely during irradiation. Instead, differentiation
`occurs predominantly during a subsequent bake. Therefore, to obtain ac(cid:173)
`ceptable CD control in these systems, the bake conditions must be carefully
`optimized and monitored.
`
`Rework. Masking steps frequently have the advantage over other IC(cid:173)
`manufactming processes of being able to undergo wafer rework. Rework
`
` Ex.1010 p.5
`
`

`
`8
`
`Plasma-Enhanced Etching
`and Deposition
`
`Dennis W. Hess and David B. Graves
`
`Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley,
`CA 94720
`
`Chemical and chemical engineering principles involved in plasma(cid:173)
`enhanced etching and deposition are reviewed, modeling approaches
`to describe and predict plasma behavior are indicated, and specific
`examples of plasma-enhanced etching and deposition of thin-film ma(cid:173)
`terials of interest to the fabrication of microelectronic and optical
`devices are discussed.
`
`THE INCREASING COMPLEXITY OF SOLID-STATE electronic and optical de(cid:173)
`
`vices places stringent demands upon the control of thin-film processes. For
`example, as device geometries drop below the 1-µ.m level, previously stan(cid:173)
`dard processing techniques for thin-film etching and deposition become
`inadequate. For etching, the control of film etch rate, uniformity, and se(cid:173)
`lectivity is no longer sufficient; the establishment of film cross sections or
`profiles is crucial to achieving overall reliability and high-density circuits.
`Low-temperature deposition methods are required to minimize defect for(cid:173)
`mation and solid-state diffusion and to be compatible with low-melting-point
`substrates or films. Therefore, the established techniques of liquid etching
`and, to some extent, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) are being replaced
`by plasma-assisted methods. Plasma-assisted etching and plasma-enhanced
`CVD (PECVD) take advantage of the high-energy electrons present in glow
`discharges to dissociate and ionize gaseous molecules to form chemically
`reactive radicals and ions. Because thermal energy is not needed to break
`chemical bonds, reactions can be promoted at low temperatures (<200 °C).
`Although the chemistry and physics of a glow discharge are extraordi(cid:173)
`narily complex, the plasma performs only two basic functions. First, reactive
`
`0065-2393/89/0221- 0377$15.60/0
`© 1989 American Chemical Society
`
` Ex.1010 p.6
`
`

`
`378
`
`MICROELECTRONICS PROCESSING: CHEMICAL ENGINEERING ASPECTS
`
`chemical species are generated by electron-impact collisions; thus they over(cid:173)
`come kinetic limitations that may exist in thermally activated processes.
`Second, the discharge supplies energetic radiation (e.g., positive ions, neu(cid:173)
`tral species, metastable species, electrons, and photons) that bombard sur(cid:173)
`faces immersed in the plasma and thus alter the surface chemistry during
`etching and deposition. The combination of these physical processes with
`the strictly chemical reactions due primarily to atoms, radicals, or molecules
`yields etch rates, etch profiles, and material properties unattainable with
`either process individually.
`
`Dry Processing
`
`Liquid etching has been the preferred method for pattern delineation for
`thin films for many y~ars (1). Its pervasive use has been due primarily to
`two considerations. First, although the exact chemistry is often poorly under(cid:173)
`stood, the technology of liquid etching is firmly established. Second, the
`selectivity (ratio of film etch rate to the etch rate of the underlying film or
`substrate) can be essentially infinite with the proper choice of etchant so-
`lution.
`.
`Despite these advantages, several critical problems arise for micrometer
`and submicrometer pattern sizes. Resist materials often lose adhesion in the
`acid solutions used fo,r mos.t etch processes and thereby alter pattern di(cid:173)
`mensions and prevent'Bne width control. As etching proceeds downward
`into the film, it proceeds laterally at an approximately equal rate. The mask
`is undercut, and an isotropic profile (Figure 1) results. Because film thickness
`and etch rate are often nonuniform across a substrate, overetching is required
`to ensure complete film removal. Overetching generates a decrease in pat(cid:173)
`tern size because of the continued lateral etching and thus affects process
`control. When the film thickness is small relative to the minimum pattern
`dimension, undercutting is insignificant. But when the film thickness is
`comparable with the pattern size, as is the case for current and future devices,
`undercutting is intolerable. Finally, as device geometries decrease, spacings
`between resist stripes also decrease. With micrometer and submicrometer
`patterns, the surface tension of etch solutions can cause the liquid to bridge
`the space between resist stripes. Because the etch solution does not contact
`the film, etching is precluded.
`The limitations encountered with solution etching can be overcome by
`plasma-enhanced etching. Adhesion is not a major problem with dry-etch
`methods. Undercutting can be controlled by varying the plasma chemistry,
`gas pressure, and electrode potentials (2-6) and thereby generate directional
`or anisotropic proµIes.
`Numerous techniques have been developed for the formation of thin(cid:173)
`film materials (7-9). Because of the versatility and throughput capability of
`CVD, this method has gained wide acceptance for a variety of film materials.
`
` Ex.1010 p.7
`
`

`
`8. HESS & GRAVES Plasma-Enhanced Etching and Deposition
`
`379
`
`Mask
`Fi Im to be etched
`
`Substrate
`
`Isotropic Profile
`No Overetch
`Liquid or Plasma
`Etching
`
`Vertical Profile
`Plasma or Dry
`Etching
`
`I•
`,....,...,....,....,.....
`
`w
`
`--I
`.._..,_...,,_
`
`Figure 1. Cross sections of films etched with liquid or plasma etchants. The
`isotropic profile is the result of zero overetch and can be generated with liquid
`or plasma etch techniques. The anisotropic (vertica~ profile requires plasma
`or dry-etch processes. W is the width of the resist pattern. (Reproduced from
`reference 2. Copyright 1983 American Chemical Society.)
`
`However, deposition rates are often low with CVD, and the presence of
`temperature-sensitive substrates or films (e.g., polymers or low-melting(cid:173)
`point metals) prior to deposition, along with the possibility of generating
`defects (e.g., vacancies, interstitials, stacking faults, and dislocations) often
`precludes the use of elevated temperatures (>300 °C) for film growth. In
`such cases, deposition rates can be enhanced by using high-energy electrons
`in a discharge rather than thermal means to supply the energy for bond
`breaking (10-14).
`
`rf Glow Discharges
`The rf (radio frequency) glow discharges (2) or plasmas used for plasma
`etching or PECVD are partially ionized gases composed of ions, electrons,
`and a host of neutral species in both ground and excited states. Typically,
`the plasma is formed by applying an electric field across a volume of gas.
`Many types of plasmas exist (15) ; they differ primarily in electron concen(cid:173)
`tration n e and average electron energy kT e · A quantity that is useful in
`
`Ex.1010 p.8
`
`

`
`380
`
`MlCHOELECTRONICS PROCESSING: CHEMICAL ENGINEERING ASPECTS
`
`characterizing the average electron energy is the ratio of the electric field
`to the pressure, Elp (15). As the electric field strength increases, free elec(cid:173)
`trons, whose velocities increase because of acceleration by the field, gain
`energy. The electrons lose this energy by inelastic collisions, so that an
`increase in pressure, which decreases the electron mean free path, decreases
`the electron energy.
`In thin-film processes for the fabrication of electronic materials and
`devices, rf glow discharges are primarily used. The application of an rf voltage
`at frequencies between 50 kHz and 40 MHz to a low-pressure (6- 600 Pa)
`gas results in a chemically unique environment (Table I. )
`Electron densities (ne) and, because the plasma is electrically neutral,
`positive-ion densities (ni) range from 108 to 10 12/cm 3
`. However, the ratio
`of the neutral-species density (nN) to the electron density is usually greater
`than 103
`, so that these plasmas are only weakly ionized. As a result, radicals
`and molecules in the discharge are primarily responsible for etching and
`deposition reactions. That is, radicals and molecules are not inherently more
`reactive than ions, but they are present in significantly higher concentrations.
`The glow discharges described by Table I are termed nonequilibrium plas(cid:173)
`mas, because the average electron energy (kT e) is considerably higher than
`the ion energy (kTJ Therefore, the discharge cannot be described ade(cid:173)
`quately by a single temperature.
`
`Physical and E1e.ctrical Characteristics. The electrical potentials
`established in the reaction chamber determine the energy of ions and elec(cid:173)
`trons striking the surfaces immersed in a discharge. Etching and deposition
`of thin films are usually performed in a capacitively coupled parallel-plate
`if reactor (see Plasma Reactors). Therefore, the following discussion will be
`directed toward this configuration.
`The important potentials in rf glow discharge systems (16, 17) are the
`plasma potential (potential of the glow region), the floating potential (po(cid:173)
`tential assumed by a surface within the plasma that is not externally biased
`or grounded and thus draws no net current), and the potential of the powered
`or externally biased electrode. When the plasma contacts a surface, that
`surface, even if grounded, is usually at a negative potential with respect to
`the plasma (16, 18, 19). Therefore, positive-ion bombardment occurs. The
`energy of the bombarding ions is established by the difference in potential
`
`Table I. Properties of rf Glow Discharges (Plasmas)
`Used for Thin-Film Etching and Deposition
`Parameter
`Value
`ne = nj
`108- 10 12/cm 3
`- 10 15- 10 16/cm 3
`nN
`1- 10 eV
`kT.
`- 0.04 eV
`kTj
`
` Ex.1010 p.9
`
`

`
`8. HESS & GRAVES Plasma-Enhanced Etching and Deposition
`
`381
`
`between the plasma and the surface that the ion strikes, the rf frequency
`(because of mobility considerations), and the gas pressure (because of col(cid:173)
`lisions). Because ion energies may range from a few volts to more than 500
`V, surface bonds can be broken, and in certain instances, sputtering of film
`or electrode material may occur (16).
`The reason for the different potentials within a plasma system becomes
`obvious when electron and ion mobilities are considered (19a). Imagine
`applying an rf field between two plates (electrodes) positioned within a low(cid:173)
`pressure gas. On the first half-cycle .of the field, one electrode is negative
`and attracts positive ions; the other electrode is positive and attracts elec(cid:173)
`trons. Because of the frequencies used and because the mobility of electrons
`is considerably greater than that of positive ions, the flux (current) of electrons
`is much larger than that of positive ions. This situation causes a depletion
`of electrons in the plasma and results in a positive plasma potential.
`On the second half-cycle, a large flux of electrons flows to the electrode
`that previously received the small flux of ions. Because plasma-etching sys(cid:173)
`tems generally have a dielectric coating on the electrodes or a series (block(cid:173)
`ing) capacitor between the power supply and the electrode, no direct current
`(de) can be passed. Therefore, on each subsequent half-cycle, negative charge
`continues to build on the electrodes and on other surfaces in contact with
`the plasma, and so electrons are repelled and positive ions are attracted to
`the surface. This transient situation ceases when a sufficient negative bias is
`achieved on the electrodes such that the fluxes of electrons and positive ions
`striking these surfaces are equal. At this point, time-average (positive) plasma
`and (negative) electrode potentials are established.
`A plasma potential that is positive with respect to electrode potentials
`is primarily a consequence of the greater mobility of electrons compared
`with positive ions. When there are many more negative ions than electrons
`in the plasma (e.g., in highly electronegative gases), plasma potentials are
`below electrode potentials, at least during part of the rf cycle (19b).
`The plasma potential is nearly uniform throughout the observed glow
`volume in an rf discharge, although a small electric field directed from the
`discharge toward the edge of the glow region exists. Between the glow and
`the electrode is a narrow region (typically 0.01- 1 cm, depending primarily
`upon pressure, power, and frequency) wherein a change from the plasma
`potential to the electrode potential occurs. This region is called a sheath or
`dark space and can be likened to a depletion layer in a semiconductor device
`in that most of the voltage is dropped across this region.
`Positive ions drift to the sheath edge where they encounter the strong
`field. The ions are then accelerated across the potential drop and strike the
`electrode or substrate surface. Because of the series capacitor or the dielectric
`coating of the electrodes, the negative potentials established on the two
`electrodes in a plasma system may not be the same. For instance, the ratio
`of the voltages on the electrodes depends upon the relative electrode areas
`
` Ex.1010 p.10
`
`

`
`382
`
`MICROELECTRONICS PROCESSING: CHEMICAL ENGINEERING ASPECTS
`
`(20). The theoretical dependence is given by equation 1, where V is the
`voltage and A is the electrode area (20).
`
`(1)
`
`If V 1 is the voltage on the powered electrode and V 2 is the voltage on
`the grounded electrode, then the voltage ratio is the inverse ratio of the
`electrode areas raised to the fourth power. However, for typical etch systems,
`the exponent of the area ratio is generally less than 4 and may be less than
`1.2 (16). This apparent deviation from theory is in part due to the reactor
`configuration. Although the physical electrodes in a plasma reactor often
`have the same area, A 2 represents the grounded electrode area, that is, the
`area of all grounded surfaces in contact with the plasma. Because this area
`usually includes the chamber walls, the area ratio can be quite large. Because
`of such considerations, the average potential distribution in a typical com(cid:173)
`mercial plasma reactor with two parallel electrodes immersed in the plasma
`is similar to that shown in Figure 2 (16). In this case, the energy of ions
`striking the powered electrode or substrates on this electrode will be higher
`than that of ions reaching the grounded electrode. Indeed, equation 1 can
`be used to design electrode areas for reactors such that a particular voltage
`can be established on an electrode surface.
`In addition to the1 r~tio of electrode areas, other plasma parameters can
`
`+v
`
`0
`
`- v
`
`Powered
`Efectrode
`
`Ground
`
`Figure 2. Potential distribution in a parallel-plate plasma etcher with the
`grounded surf ace area larger than the powered electrode area. V is the po(cid:173)
`tential, and VP is the plasma potential. (Reproduced with permission from
`reference 16. Copyright 1979 The Electrochemical Society, Inc.)
`
` Ex.1010 p.11
`
`

`
`8. HESS & GRAVES Plasma-Enhanced Etching and Deposition
`
`383
`
`affect the electrical characteristics of the discharge. Varying the rf power
`input will alter plasma and electrode potentials, as well as ion concentrations,
`and thereby change ion energies and fluxes. Also, radio frequency affects
`the kinetic energy of ions that strike surfaces in contact with the plasma.
`This effect can be readily understood by considering the behavior of an ion
`experiencing an oscillating plasma potential caused by applied rf voltages
`(21, 22). Depending upon the ion mobility, some frequency exists above
`which the ion can no longer follow the alternating voltage. Therefore, the
`ion cannot traverse the sheath in one half-cycle. Above this frequency, ions
`experience an accelerating field (the difference between the plasma and
`electrode potentials divided by the sheath thickness) that is an average over
`a number of half-cycles. At lower frequencies, where the ions can respond
`directly to the oscillating field, they are accelerated by instantaneous fields.
`Thus, the ions can attain the maximum energy corresponding to the maxi(cid:173)
`mum instantaneous field across the sheath. As a result, for a constant sheath
`potential, ion bombardment energies and fluxes are higher at lower fre(cid:173)
`quencies.
`
`Chemical Characteristics. Because etching or deposition processes
`are merely chemical reactions that yield a volatile or involatile product,
`respectively, the overall process can be broken down into the following six
`primary steps:
`
`1. Generation of reactive species
`2. Diffusion to the surface
`3. Adsorption
`4. Reaction
`5. Desorption of volatile products
`6. Diffusion of volatile products away from the surface
`
`First, reactive atoms, molecules, and ions must be generated by elec(cid:173)
`tron-molecule collisions. Because most of the reactant gases or vapors used
`for plasma-enhanced etching and deposition do not spontaneously undergo
`reaction at the low temperatures involved, radicals or atoms must be formed
`so that heterogeneous chemical reactions can proceed at reasonable rates.
`The reactive species thus generated diffuse to surfaces where they can adsorb
`onto a surface site. Sticking coefficients are believed to be large for free
`radicals, such that chemisorption and surface reactions occur readily (23).
`Surface diffusion of physically adsorbed species or volatile product molecules
`can occur.
`The nature of the primary reaction product differentiates plasma-en(cid:173)
`hanced etching from deposition. In etching, the volatility of reaction products
`
` Ex.1010 p.12
`
`

`
`384
`
`MICROELECTRONICS PROCESSING: CHEMICAL E NGINEERING ASPECTS
`
`is crucial to film removal. Although the principal reaction product in dep(cid:173)
`osition processes is not volatile, secondary products (e.g., hydrogen or halide
`molecules) must desorb to avoid incorporation into, and thus contamination
`of, the growing film. Complete elimination of such contamination is difficult,
`because particle bombardment of adsorbed species can assist incorporation.
`As indicated previously, the chemical reactions taking place in glow
`discharges are exceedingly complex. However, two general types of chemical
`processes can be categorized: homogeneous gas-phase collisions and het(cid:173)
`erogeneous surface interactions. To completely understand and characterize
`plasma processes, the fundamental principles of both processes must be
`understood.
`
`Homogeneous Processes. Homogeneous gas-phase collisions generate
`reactive free radicals, metastable species, and ions. Therefore, chemical
`dissociation and ionization are independent of the thermodynamic temper(cid:173)
`ature. Electron impact can result in a number of different reactions de(cid:173)
`pending upon the electron energy. The following list indicates these reaction
`types in order of increasing energy requirement (24- 26).
`
`• Excitation (rotational, vibrational, or electronic)
`e + X 2 ~ X 2* + e
`• Dissociative attachment
`e + X2 ~ x- + X + + e
`• Dissociation
`e + X 2 ~ 2X + e
`• Ionization
`e + X 2 ~ X 2 + + 2e
`• Dissociative ionization
`e + X 2 ~ X + + X + 2e
`
`Excitation and dissociation processes can occur with mean electron ener(cid:173)
`gies below a few electronvolts. Thus, the discharge is extremely effective in
`producing large quantities of free radicals. Many of these species are gen(cid:173)
`erated by direct dissociation, although if attachment of an electron to a
`molecule results in the formation of a repulsive excited state, the molecule
`can dissociate by dissociative attachment. These attachment processes are
`prevalent at low electron energies (<l eV) when electronegative gases or
`vapors are used. By comparison, the ionization of many molecules or atoms
`requires energies greater than - 8 eV, so that relatively few ions exist. The
`generation of reactive species is balanced by losses due to recombination
`processes at smfaces (electrodes and chamber walls) and in the gas phase,
`along with diffusion out of the plasma.
`
` Ex.1010 p.13
`
`

`
`8. HESS & GRAVES Plasma-Enhanced Etching and Deposition
`
`385
`
`Electron-impact reactions occur at a rate (R) determined by the con(cid:173)
`centrations of both electrons (nJ and a particular reactant (N) species (24).
`
`(2)
`
`The proportionality constant k is the rate coefficient, which can be expressed
`by
`
`k = f"'
`
`Ethr«.'s
`
`(2E/m)cr(E)f(E)de
`
`(3)
`
`where e and m are the impinging electron energy and mass, respectively;
`cr(e) is the cross section for the specific reaction; and fi.e) is the electron
`energy distribution function. The limits of the integral run from the threshold
`energy for the impact reaction to infinity. If an accurate expression for fi.e)
`and electron collision cross sections for the various gas-phase species present
`are known, k can be calculated. Unfortunately, such information is generally
`unavailable for many of the molecules used in plasma etching and deposition.
`Because of the highly nonequilibrium conditions experienced by elec(cid:173)
`trons in the plasma, fie) almost never follows the Maxwell-Boltzmann dis(cid:173)
`tribution. In general, the distribution function is determined by the electric
`field that accelerates electrons and collisions that cause electrons to change
`energy. Very few direct measurements of f(e) have been made under con(cid:173)
`ditions of interest to plasma etching or deposition; consequently, the current
`understanding offiE) is limited, at best. This fact impedes the ability to make
`quantitative predictions of electron-impact rates. As previously described,
`ionization due to electron impact occurs through the action of the most
`energetic electrons in the distribution. The number of electrons in the high(cid:173)
`energy tail of the distribution that are capable of ionizing neutral species in
`the discharge is considerably less than the number of electrons capable of
`molecular dissociation. As a result, the degree of ionization is usually much
`less than the degree of molecular dissociation.
`A second type of homogeneous impact reaction is that occurring between
`the various heavy species generated by electron collisions, as well as between
`these species and unreacted gas-phase molecules (27, 28). Again, dissociation
`and ionization processes occur, but in addition, recombination and molecular
`rearrangements are prevalent. Particularly important inelastic collisions are
`those called Penning processes (29). In these collisions, metastable species
`(species in excited states where quantum mechanical selection rules forbid
`transition to the ground state and thus have long lifetimes) collide with
`neutral species, transfer their excess energy, and thereby cause dissociation
`or ionization. These processes are particularly important with gases, such
`as argon and helium, that have available a number oflong-lifetime metastable
`states. Furthermore, Penning ionization has a large cross section, which
`enhances the probability of this process.
`
` Ex.1010 p.14
`
`

`
`386
`
`MICROELECTRONICS PROCESSING: CHEMICAL ENGIN EERING ASPECTS
`
`Heterogeneous Processes. A variety of heterogeneous processes can
`occur at solid surfaces exposed to a glow discharge (28, 30-32). The primary
`processes of interest in plasma etching and deposition are summarized in
`the following list (23). These interactions result from the bombardment of
`surfaces by particles.
`
`• Ion-surface interactions
`1. Neutralization and secondary electron emission
`2. Sputtering
`3. Ion-induced chemistry
`• Electron-surface interactions
`1. Secondary electron emission
`2. Electron-induced chemistry
`• Radical- or atom-surface interactions
`1. Surface etching
`2. Film deposition
`
`Although vacuum-UV photons and soft X-rays present in the plasma are
`sufficiently energetic to break chemical bonds, electron and, particularly,
`ion bombardments 'are the most effective methods of promoting surface
`reactions (33).
`Several theoretical investigations (23, 34, 35) indicate that nearly all
`incident ions will be neutralized within a few atomic radii of a surface,
`presumably because of electrons arising from Auger emission processes.
`These results suggest that the particles ultimately striking surfaces in contact
`with a glow discharge are neutral species rather than ions. To a first ap(cid:173)
`proximation, effects due to energetic ions and neutral species should be
`similar, provided that the particle energies are the same.
`Auger emission to neutralize incoming ions leaves the solid surface in
`an excited state; relaxation of the surface results in secondary electron gen(cid:173)
`eration (23, 24). Secondary electrons are ejected when high-energy ions,
`electrons, or neutral species strike the solid surface. These electrons enhance
`the electron density in the plasma and can alter the plasma chemistry near
`a solid surface. Radiation impingement on a surface can induce a number
`of phenomena that depend upon the bombardment flux and energy.
`As noted previously (33), positive ions (or fast neutral species) are ex(cid:173)
`tremely efficient in enhancing surface processes; thus this chapter will con(cid:173)
`centrate on ion bombardment effects. The various surface, thin-film, and
`bulk phenomena affected by born barding species are indicated in Figu

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket