throbber
Ex.1020 p.1
`
`

`
`77L§
`_TE£H1‘£L(LGY
`
`Edited by
`S. NI. Sze
`b’:-:'.' [.a:';z~r.-:.‘m‘1r.=.»'.
`/*i:'t},"_,'HI!‘.'.'n'c‘:'.‘
`.\Im:ru_-. Han‘.
`.\'e'v.'J».'*r'.u=\'
`
`".
`
`I I-II:~
`
`McGraw-Hill Book Company
`Sgt‘. I-tun-.':x.:.'u
`v'\In'x|;mJ B.“"';:
`H:n:_:\h'..r_s_~
`.\IudriJ
`\I:.\';u:-
`‘V1--u'._':';:l
`.\:'.L lxln:
`_-um}
`Tuk}-.:
`‘I :1rnn'.r.u
`
`Ex.1020 p.2
`
`

`
`This book was set in Tints Roman by Izzfommaxiun Sciences C0:p0ra.:i0n.
`The editors vuere'T. Michael Slaughter and .\-Iadclain: Eichbarg:
`the production supmi.~.ur was Lcr0_ \. Young.
`The cover was designed by Jmcph (J .
`.
`Th: drawings. were done by Bell l..eibur;mrics. incorponimi.
`Halliday Lithograph Curpm-.al':nn was pnme: and bi.-.;lcr.
`
`VLSI TECHNOLOGY
`
`Cupyrigh “Q 1933 by Bell T;-lcphonc Laborawrien. Incn1~.nr.-izcd. All rig‘r.L~. n:.s<:."u.‘('.. Primed in
`the United Szzuss of America Exccpi as pvnnzncd undci
`iii: L'ni:-:::£ Stat-as Cop}'1i_:h'.
`.-\-.1 or
`1976. no pan of this publicalzon .-my be reproduced or dianibuzcd in u::_v fur-:. nr h_~.' :m_\
`.'X)€£ul>.
`nr smned in a data hasc or :etne\-a.‘ sysl:m.
`-.-.-nhnu: the prior xv.-.n:-n permission of Bull Talc-
`phunc Labomtories. Iziccnrpurami.
`
`L-'3:i56'FR.9()H.-‘\LHALS9S76S4
`
`ISBN CI-D?-Dl=El=&L=-3
`
`Library of Congress Oatalogiiig ix: Puhlication Data
`IN-Iain entry under title:
`VI SI (ethnology.
`
`(.\1cGr4w-Hail series in electrical cnginccring.
`Elommnics and electronic cin:uit<i
`Includcs index.
`
`Inzegrared cim-u;ts—V’ciy large mu:
`1.
`inlzgn-itzon
`I. Sze. S. M.. datc
`II. Series.
`19543
`Ti(73':'4.\«’566
`ISBN 04)?-062686-3
`
`6”} .38! ‘?3
`
`Ex.1020 p.3
`
`

`
`CHAPTER
`
`EIGHT
`
`DRY ETCHING
`
`C. J. MOGAB
`
`SJ INTRODUCTION
`
`ist pattems defined by the lithographic techniques described in Chapter 7 are not
`.
`tcrmanent elements of the final device but only replicas of circuit features. To pro~
`;;:e circuit features. these resist patterns must be transferred into the layers compris-
`ig the device. One method of trunsfening the pattems is to selt:ctively remove
`-2‘.3Zl21Si'(€(I portions of a layer. a process generally known
`etching.
`As the title of this chapter suggests. "dry etching" methods are particularly suit-
`zbie for VLSI processing. Dry etcliing is syntiriyrrrous with plasma-assisted etching’
`-~'nic':t denotes several‘ techniques that use plasmas in the form of low-pressure gas-
`:3us discharges. These techniques are commonly used in VLSI processing because of
`2-eeir putcttlial for very—liigh-fidelity transfer of resist pattems.
`The earliest application of pi:lSIT.aS to silicon lCs dates back to the late 19605.
`«hen oxygen plasmas were being explored for the stripping of pi't0t0t'esi5ts.: Work on
`:;-it- use of plasmas for etching silicon was also initiated in the late 1960s and was sig-
`naled hy a patent} detailing the use of Cf-‘,—0;
`mixtures. At that time. there was
`-in universal endorsement of dry methods which were largely novel replacements for
`e\isting wet chemical lccliniqttcs.
`This early work set the stage for an important period in the evolution of [C tt:t:h—
`rzulog}-‘. From 1972 to 1974. workers at several major laboratories were heavily
`:nvulveL'i iii the d$\'€lUpmClll of an irtorganic pa.ssi\-‘utiort layer for .\'IOS devices. The
`jarctcrrcd passivutitin turned out to be a plasma-deposited silicon nitride layer. While
`:':tis material exhibited many desirable characteristics. there was one immediate diffr-
`;ult_v. No suitable net chemical etchant could be found to etch windows in the nirrjdc
`zn order to
`underlyirtg metallization for subsequent bonding. This problem
`
`303
`
`Ex.1020 p.4
`
`

`
`304 VLSI TT_Cl-{XOl_OC:Y
`
`was circumvented by the use of CF;-O3 plasma etching.‘ Concurrently. CF; —O_~
`plasma etching_ was developed for patterning CVD silicon nitride layers being used as
`junction seals.’ These efforts marked the first significant applications of plasma etch-
`ing in IC manufacture and the beginning of li1TgL'—.\'Clll<3 etlotts to develop plasma etch-
`ing techniques.
`Not long after this. an awareness of the potential of plasrna techniques for highly
`anisotropic etching evolved.
`In particular. there were many observations of a vertical
`etch rate that greatly exceeded the lateral etch rate when etching through a layer of
`material.
`will become apparent. anisotropy is necessary for high-rcsoiulittn pat-
`tern transfer. The s-ignit"ieancc of etch anisotropy was recognized by researchers who
`were hoping to achieve ever larger scales of integration by designing circuits with
`ever smaller features. By the mid—19?(ls. t'nerefore. rnost major IC manufacturers hail
`mounted substantial efforts to develop plassna-assisted etching methods. These
`methods were no longer seen as merely novel substitutes for wet etching. but rather as
`techniques having capabilities uniquely suited to meeting forseeable requirements on
`pattern transfer.
`
`8.2 PATTER.l\' TRANSFER
`
`"Pattern transfer" refers to the transfer of a pattern. tlcfinetl by a masking layer. into
`a film or substrate by chemical or physical methods that produce surface relic-l‘.
`
`8.2.1 Subtractive and Additive Methods
`
`la. the film is tlcpositeti
`In the .mbrracm~e method of pattern transfer shown in Fig.
`first. a patterned masking layer is then generated litnograpitically. and the unmasketi
`portions of the film are removed by etching.
`In the ua’di':i'n» tor lift-offi metho:
`shown in Fig.
`lb. the lithographic mask is generated first. the film is then deposited
`over the mask and substrate. and those portions of the film over the mask are I'&tI‘l0V€C
`by selectively dissolving the masking layer in an appropriate liquid so that the overly-
`ing film is lifted off and removed.
`The subtractive methods collectively known as dry etching are the preferred
`means for pattem transfer in VLSI processing today. The lift-off process is capable of
`high resolution. but is not as widely applicable as dry etching.
`
`8.2.2 Resolution and Edge Profiles in Subtractive Pattern Transfer
`
`The resolution of an etching process is a rneasure of the fidelity of pattem transfer.
`which can be quantified by two parameters. Bias is the difterenee in lateral dimen-
`sion between the ezched image and the mask image. defined as shown in Fig. 2
`Tolerance is a measure of the statistical distribution of bias values that characterize~
`the lateral uniformity of etching.
`
`Ex.1020 p.5
`
`

`
`DRY ETCHL\’G 305
`
`"5
`suasr-7:1:
`;’
`-....’.~...,.4
`
`‘ /
`vmsx
`-'AF-Eq
`LITHC-'..‘-R-’AP.-(Y T
`‘:
`suas*m-.r:
`‘L-,-.._._~.___.
`
`,
`‘
`
`3E°OsIr—~;'II
`
`Fig.
`
`l Suitcmzali.‘iJJ'.;aIl'aIzulI><Ir¥z:I>.;i:-Zr;Lc11wand-Ch;L:;iilI?I'.'::1):Ih1xJsnfp;merI)lruns.ix:r.
`
`A zcm~bia.~: pl‘0CL‘.\‘.~' produces a vefiitai edge profilu coincident with the edgc of
`1:: :nu:~3-<. as shown in Fig. 3:1.
`In this case. there is no etching in Ihc lateral direction
`:6 the paztcm is tran.~;fcn'cd with perfect fidelity. This casc represents the extreme of
`.‘.".'V(lIf()[)ir‘ etching. When the xjenicul and lateral clch rates an equal or. more: pre-
`_-~.-ly. when the nxch ratc :~ mdepcnticn: of direction. the cdge profile appears as a
`.‘.'.::1cr-circlc after etching has bccn curried just to completion. as shown in Fig. 3b.
`:his case of z'5o!ropi(' etching. the bias i.~. twice til: fnim thickness.
`
`'J.‘..'rC .1?" rice un‘.nu"l l‘._\ -vhzch :5: .-Lu}-.«:<.l film ..'nd.-.'n.'ul\ '..'.C iiwsk ul (Etc ir.4.~">:-film
`
`Ex.1020 p.6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket