throbber
USO05767458A
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,767,458
`Jun. 16,1998
`
`Tajin' et al. ............................. .. 178/20
`
`4,752,655
`5,225,636
`
`
`
`Protheroe Duwaer ...... ..
`
`..
`
`6/ 1988
`7/1993
`7/1993
`5,359,156 10/1994
`Chan et a1. 6/1996 Katabami .
`
`United States Patent 1191
`Koolen
`
`[54]
`
`LOW-PASS FILTER OF GRAPHICAL
`TABLET HAS CUT-OFF FREQUENCY
`LOWER THAN SAMPLING FREQUECY
`
`[75]
`
`Inventor:
`
`Gerardus J.K.M. Koolen. Eindhoven.
`Netherlands Antilles
`
`[73] Assignee: U.S. Philips Corporation. New York.
`NY.
`
`Appl. No.: 603,958
`[21]
`[22]
`Filed:
`Feb. 20, 1996
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`[30]
`Feb. 21, 1995 [EP]
`European Pat. O?'.
`
`95200432
`
`[51] Int. (:1.6 ............................ .. G08C 21/00; 6096 3/02
`[52] U.S. Cl. ............................ .. 178/18; 178/19; 345/173;
`345/174
`[58] Field of Search ................................ .. 178/18. 19. 20;
`345/173. 174, 179
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`
`
`2/1997 Fukuzaki .... ..
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`9424648 10/1994 WIPO .
`
`Primary Examiner—Curtis Kuntz
`Assistant Examiner-Vijay Shankar
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`
`A graphical tablet includes a pair of parts to be brought into
`electrical contact with one another under user-interaction.
`Electrical signals are generated indicative of X and Y
`coordinates of the contact. The signals are ?ltered by a
`low-pass ?lter. The ?ltered X and Y signals are sampled with
`a particular sampling frequency and are held in separate X
`and Y holding circuits. The cut-01f frequency of the ?lter is
`at least part of the time substantially lower than the sampling
`frequency. as each holding circuit has to settle for only
`increments and decrements relative to its stored sample
`value. Thus the spectrum of noise rejection is widened with
`respect to the prior art.
`
`4,581,483 4/1986 Ralston
`
`4,616,107 10/1986 Abe . . . . .
`
`. . . . . . . .
`
`. . . . . . . .
`
`. . . . .. 178/18
`
`. . . .. 178/19
`
`11 Claims,2Drawing Sheets
`
`5111mm; MlEANS
`114
`;-—-‘—
`
`111151 111114 11515101
`\ 10s
`I
`P’
`
`110
`
`l Ham
`DATA
`1 GEN
`PROCESSING '— |
`l
`APPARATUS
`1
`'1 1
`l
`l
`118
`I
`
`? A
`I I
`
`#408
`
`PC
`
`X
`",2
`
`122
`1 Hour“ | -\'
`|--- J i-—- 0011111
`INPUT
`12o
`
`\\
`srcoun P1111
`100 “$132M 104 11515101:
`
`GOOGLE Ex. 1017
`Google v. Philips
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jun. 16, 1998
`
`Sheet 1 0f 2
`
`5,767,458
`
`SAMPLING H§ANS
`114
`
`FIRST Fla.“ RESiSTOR
`\ 106
`
`DATA
`PROCESSING
`APPARATUS
`
`l
`l
`.___ I
`I
`I
`
`‘
`
`136
`'
`
`118
`
`I f
`I
`l GEN
`? A
`I
`, ,"———
`I
`4,108
`I
`
`PC
`
`\
`102
`
`Q2 \
`| HOLD-j | _\"
`L-- J +_¢o~'m
`mm 120
`
`\\sEc0u0 FILM
`T
`100 ‘ENSEU 104 RESISTOR
`FIG. 1
`
`122
`2
`com
`
`mcRoPRocEssm
`"P
`
`\
`220
`
`GOOGLE Ex. 1017
`Google v. Philips
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Jun. 16, 1998
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`5,767,458
`
`|
`
`122
`kl
`
`com
`
`2)2o
`‘
`'—PP
`
`sscoun FILM
`RESISTOR
`
`FIRST FILM I
`
`RESISTOR _
`
`_>
`
`—-J 7 11s I
`
`-x
`
`A14
`
`12‘
`
`I»
`MICROPROCESSUR
`
`316
`
`FIG. 3‘
`
`GOOGLE Ex. 1017
`Google v. Philips
`
`

`

`1
`LOW-PASS FILTER OF GRAPHICAL
`TABLET HAS CUT-OFF FREQUENCY
`LOWER THAN SAIVIPLING FREQUECY
`
`5 .767,458
`
`2
`could be reduced by synchronizing the operation of the
`tablet with that of the display. The tablet then is active only
`during time slots wherein the display is relatively quiet.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`35
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`1. Field of the Invention
`The invention relates to a data processing system with a
`data input device for enabling entering respective data into
`the system upon user-interaction at respective ?rst and
`second coordinates relative to the device. The device
`includes generating means for generating signals indicative
`of the ?rst and second coordinates. low-pass ?lter means for
`?ltering of the signals. and sampling means for sampling of
`the ?ltered signals with a sampling frequency.
`2. Background Art
`Graphical user-interfaces have become widespread in the
`?eld of data input devices as highly suitable means to
`communicate with a data processing system. Examples of
`graphical user-interfaces are touch screens and graphical
`tablets that enable a user to selectively enter data into the
`system by touching a screen at predetermined locations and
`by manipulating a stylus contacting the surface of the tablet.
`respectively. US. Pat. No. 5.231.381 (PHN 13.100) dis
`closes an attractive example wherein a touch screen and a
`graphical tablet are combined with an LCD into a multiple
`purpose graphical user-interface device. The touch screen
`and graphical tablet have functionally different detection
`mechanisms so as to avoid mutual interference. As the
`present invention relates particularly. but not exclusively. to
`user-interfaces that include a graphical tablet. some well
`known examples of detection mechanisms used in graphical
`tablets are discussed below.
`A ?rst example of graphical tablet probes with a stylus a
`DC voltage established across an electrically resistive layer.
`The DC voltage has a gradient in a particular direction so as
`to unambiguously associate the voltage level with a coor
`dinate in that direction. Such tablet is referred to herein
`below as a resistive tablet. Sec. e.g.. international applica
`tion WO 94/24648. A second example of graphical tablet
`employs a top ?lm resistor facing a bottom ?lm resistor. A
`stylus is used to depress the top ?lm to bring it into electrical
`contact with the bottom ?lm. A voltage gradient is estab
`lished across one of the ?lms and the other ?lm is used to
`measure the voltage at the contact point. The measured
`voltage is representative of the location of the point of
`contact. Such tablet is referred to herein below as a mem
`brane tablet.
`The accuracy of both resistive and membrane tablets is
`found to be hampered by all sorts of noise. One of the major
`sources of noise is considered to be contact noise. stemming
`from a wildly varying resistance of the contacting parts. such
`as stylus and resistive layer of the resistive tablet. and the
`?lms of the membrane tablet. The contact resistance typi
`cally sweeps across a range of l ohmto 100K ohms. i.e.. ?ve
`orders of magnitude. The variation is thought to derive at
`least partly from the contacting surfaces being physically
`inhomogeneous. e.g.. having a rough uneven surface at the
`relevant scale.
`Another major noise source that affects accuracy is the
`display with which such tablets usually are combined to
`serve as a visual feedback. For example. in case of the
`display including an LCD. the so-called M-signal causes
`radiation that is picked up by the resistive layers or by at
`least one of the ?lms. The undesirable effects of noise are
`somewhat mitigated by use of ?lters such as a low-pass ?lter
`either in software or in hardware. The radiation noise etfects
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`OBJECT OF THE INVENTION
`
`It is. inter alia. an object of the invention to provide a data
`processing system with a low-cost. high-performance
`graphical user-interface device whose accuracy is higher
`than that of the conventional devices.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`To this end. the invention provides a system as speci?ed
`in the preamble. characterized by the following features. The
`sampling means comprises ?rst holding means for holding a
`?rst sample associated with a value of the ?rst coordinate.
`and second holding means for holding a second sample
`associated with a value of the second coordinate. The device
`further comprises ?lter control means operative to decrease
`at least temporarily a cut-0E frequency of the ?lter means
`substantially below the sampling frequency.
`The inventor has recognized that dividing the sampling
`means into separate holding means for each coordinate
`individually enables decreasing the settling time with
`respect to a single holding means used for both coordinates
`alternately. This owes to the fact that a particular one of the
`holding means is permitted to retain its previous sample
`value and only needs to adapt to an increment or decrement
`for the next value. That is. each holding means only needs
`a time for the dilferential value to settle. In operational use
`of the graphical tablet for input of. e.g.. handwriting. con
`secutive samples will di?'er only marginally. According to
`the invention. the cut-off frequency can be lowered well
`below the sampling frequency. i.e.. the rate at which each of
`the holding means is supplied with samples. As a
`consequence. the bandwidth is decreased to reject a wider
`band of noise. Note that this is impossible for a device using
`a single sample-and hold circuit for handling X and Y
`coordinates alternately. as the full sample value must be
`allowed to settle each sampling cycle after reset.
`When the user starts entering data. or when the user enters
`data in the form of intermittent dots. the full settling time is
`needed so that the full sample value can be acquired. This
`requires temporarily raising the cut-off frequency to or
`above the sampling frequency. Accordingly. the inventor has
`realized that the cutoff frequency therefore is preferably
`varied in the following manner. When the input device does
`not receive a stimulus from the user the cut-off frequency is
`zero. i.e.. the ?lter means is off. Upon detection of the
`stimulus. the cut-otf frequency is initially raised to a high
`value. preferably much higher than the sampling frequency.
`Subsequently. the cut-off frequency is lowered to well below
`the sampling frequency.
`Typically. low-pass ?lter means comprises an integrating
`network with a resistance between input and output and a
`capacitance connected to the output. In the invention the ?rst
`and second holding means comprise ?rst and second
`capacitances. respectively. that are selectively connected to
`the ?lter’s resistance via controlled switches so as to merge
`the holding means with the ?lter means. The effective cut-off
`frequency now can be varied by changing the duty cycle of
`the signal controlling the switches. The duty cycle control is
`preferably made dependent on the initialization of the user
`interaction. The duty cycle then is ?rst made large. e.g..
`100% and thereupon decreased to. say. 10%.
`Preferably. the ?lter control means is operative to control
`the cut-01f frequency in dependence on a noise-related
`
`GOOGLE Ex. 1017
`Google v. Philips
`
`

`

`5,767.45 8
`
`3
`quantity. For example. the device may include a pair of parts
`operative to be brought into electrical contact with one
`another under user-interaction for enabling generation of the
`signals indicative of the ?rst and second coordinates of the
`contact relative to the device. The ?lter control means then
`may control the cut-off frequency in dependence on a
`contact resistance of said parts. Alternatively. or subsidian'ly.
`the cut-01f frequency could be controlled in dependence on
`the radiation noise of a display integrated with the data input
`device. An elegant manner to achieve the dependence on
`contact resistance is to functionally integrate the contact
`resistance with the low-pass ?lter means. When the contact
`resistance increases. the bandwidth should decrease in order
`to reduce the eifects of contact noise. The inventor has
`recognized the fact that this functional integration can be
`applied to. among other things. both the resistive tablet and
`the membrane tablet discussed above. The principle of the
`invention also can be applied to a variety of touch screens.
`
`10
`
`4
`connected to a respective one of holding means 116 and 118.
`The rate at which each of holding means 116 and 118 is
`supplied with sample values is the sampling frequency.
`Filter control means 122 is provided to decrease at least
`temporarily a cut-01f frequency of ?lter means 112 substan
`tially below the sampling frequency.
`Each of holding means 116 and 118 is permitted to retain
`its previous sample value and only needs to adapt to an
`increment or decrement for the next value. thus enabling the
`cut-01f frequency to be lower than the sampling frequency.
`Filter control means 122 may simply ?x the cut-off fre
`quency at a value substantially below the sampling fre
`quency. This. however. may hamper initialization of data
`entry. as the content of holding means 116 and 118 ?rst has
`to be brought into the capture range for the short settling
`time required for decrements and increments. Preferably.
`?lter control means 122 comprises contact detection means
`124 for temporarily having the cut-o? frequency raised to or
`above the sampling frequency when initializing contact
`between parts 106 and 108. This could be achieved by. for
`example. control of the duty cycle of the signal that controls
`switch 120.
`
`Resistive tablet
`FIG. 2 is a diagram of a ?rst example of an input device
`200 for use in system 100 of FIG. 1. Device 200 is a resistive
`graphical tablet comprised of a resistive ATO layer 106 and
`a stylus 108. here electrically represented by its contact
`resistor 108. DC voltage sources 202 and 203 are controlled
`in operational use to establish a voltage gradient across ATO
`layer 106. Tablet 200 is operated upon by the user through
`stylus 108 that probes the voltage at a point of contact 204
`with ATO layer 106. The X coordinate of the point of contact
`204 between stylus 108 and ATO layer 106 has a voltage
`determined by the voltage divider made up of resistors 206
`and 208 that represent portions of layer 106 at the left and
`right hand side of stylus 108. The resistances of resistors 206
`and 208 depend on the location of point 204 relative to layer
`106. A similar argument applies to the Y coordinate. Opera
`tion so far is well known in the art so that FIG. 1 shows only
`a single dimension of layer 106 in order to not obscure the
`drawing. Stylus 108 is electrically coupled to an ampli?er
`210. preferably having a high input impedance 212 to reduce
`the load. The voltage at contacting point 204 determines the
`voltage across input impedance 212 and. therefore. the
`output signal of ampli?er 210. The output of ampli?er 210
`is connected to an AID converter 218 whose output is
`supplied to a microcontroller 220. Microcontroller 220
`thereupon furnishes data to PC 102.
`Capacitors 116 and 118 are connected across impedance
`212 through switches 214 and 216. Switches 214 and 216
`are operated alternately to allow charge to accumulate on
`capacitors 116 and 118 that is representative of the X and Y
`coordinates. respectively. of point 204. Functionally. capaci
`tors 116 and 118 serve both as holding means 116 and 118
`illustrated in FIG. 1 and as an integral part of ?lter means
`112. Capacitors 116 and 118 have capacitances of. e.g.. l-10
`nF. Filter means 112 in device 200 is comprised of contact
`resistor 108 and capacitors 116 and 118 that are alternately
`connected to resistor 108. When stylus 108 physically
`contacts ATO layer 106. contact resistance 108 may vary
`between 1 ohm and 100K ohm due to surface irregularities
`of the contacting surfaces of stylus 108 and layer 106. The
`functional integration of resistor 108 with ?lter means 112
`renders the bandwidth of ?lter means 112 dependent on the
`contact resistance 108. The bandwidth is reduced when
`contact resistance 108 increases. Thus the eiTects of contact
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`The invention is explained below in further detail and by
`way of example with reference to the accompanying
`drawing. wherein
`FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system in the invention;
`FIG. 2 is a diagram of a resistive tablet in the invention;
`and
`FIG. 3 is a diagram of membrane tablet in the invention.
`Throughout the drawing like reference symbols indicate
`corresponding or similar features.
`
`25
`
`30
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
`
`Block diagram of general system
`FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system 100 according to the
`invention. System 100 comprises a data processing appara
`tus 102. such as a PC. and a data input device 104 that is
`coupled to or functionally integrated with apparatus 102.
`Device 104 is comprised of a ?rst part 106 and a second part
`108 that are to be brought into electrical contact with one
`another under user-interaction. Device 104 is. for example.
`a graphical tablet to enable entering data with a stylus. Parts
`106 and 108 are. for example. a stylus and a resistive layer.
`or two ?lm resistors as explained above. Establishing the
`electrical contact causes generating means 110 to generate
`electrical signals indicative of an X coordinate and an Y
`coordinate relative to device 104. As this mechanism is
`known. reference is made to the general background art of
`graphical tablets for further information.
`Device 104 also includes low-pass ?lter means 112 for
`?ltering of the signals. and sampling means 114 coupled to
`an output of ?lter means 112 for sampling of the ?ltered
`signals with a sampling frequency. Filter means 112 and
`sampling means 114 are drawn as separate functionalities
`but may be physically merged as explained above. Sampling
`means 114 comprises ?rst holding means 116 for holding a
`?rst sample associated with a value of the X coordinate. and
`second holding means 118 for holding a second sample
`associated with a value of the Y coordinate. FIG. 1 shows a
`single ?lter means 112 connected to ?rst and second holding
`means 116 and 118 via a single switch 120 controlled by a
`controller (not shown) in device 104. Filter means 112 may
`be comprised of a single low-pass ?lter. Alternatively.
`generator 110 may supply each respective one of the signals
`representing the X and Y coordinates to a respective one of
`a pair of low-pass ?lters that in turn have a respective output
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`$5
`
`65
`
`GOOGLE Ex. 1017
`Google v. Philips
`
`

`

`5,767.45 8
`
`5
`noise are drastically reduced. A resistor 221 of. e.g.. 10K
`ohm is inserted between stylus 108 and ampli?er 210 to set
`an upper limit to the cut-01f frequency.
`Initial contact between stylus 108 and layer 106 is deter
`mined with help of a series connection of a switch 222 and
`a resistor 224 arranged in parallel to high input resistance
`212 of ampli?er 210. and with help of sources 203. Initially.
`the voltage of layer 106 is made uniformly high throughout
`layer 106 by appropriate control of sources 202 and 203.
`Switch 222 is turned on. When stylus 108 contacts layer 106.
`stylus 108 closes the electrical circuit and ampli?er 210
`experiences a detectable voltage jump as a sign that elec
`trical contact has been made. Thereupon. switch 222 is
`turned off to start the coordinate detection as explained
`above. The effective cut-off frequency is changed during this
`operation by control of the duty cycle of the signals supplied
`by ?lter control means 122 to switches 120.
`Filter control means 122 is shown as a separate feature.
`Note that ?lter control means 122. the control of switches
`214. 216 and 222. and the control of voltage sources 202 and
`203 may all be integrated in a single controller. e.g.. con
`troller 220. comprising dedicated control software.
`
`15
`
`Membrane tablet
`
`FIG. 3 is a diagram of a second example of an input
`device 300 for use in system 100. Device 300 is a membrane
`graphical tablet comprised of a top ?lm resistor 106 facing
`a bottom ?lm resistor 108. In order to depress top ?lm 106
`to bring it into electrical contact with bottom ?lm 108 a
`stylus (not shown) can be used. By pair-wise control of
`switches 302. 304. 306 and 308. a voltage gradient is
`established across one of ?lm resistors 106 and 108. the
`other then being used to measure the voltage at a contact
`point. The measured signal voltages are representative of the
`coordinates of the point of contact. The signals are supplied
`via alternately controlled switches 120 to capacitors 116 and
`118. Capacitors 116 and 118 function as holding means 116
`and 118 of FIG. 1. In addition. capacitors 116 and 118 form
`?lter means 112 together with the contact resistance of ?lm
`resistors 106 and 108. Similar as to device 200 of FIG. 2.
`integrating the contact resistance in ?lter means 112 selec
`tively reduces bandwidth with increasing resistance. Capaci
`tors 116 and 118 have capacitanees of. say. 100 nF. Addi
`tional resistors 310 and 312 of. e.g.. 10K ohm. may be
`included to set a lower limit to the effective contact resis
`tance. The voltages across capacitors 116 and 118 are
`supplied to controller 220. preferably via A/D converters
`(not shown).
`Initial contact between ?lm resistors 106 and 108 is
`detected via switch 314 and resistor 316 in. for example. the
`following manner. Initially. switches 120. 304. 306 and 308
`are turned oif and switch 314 is on. When switch 302 is on.
`?lm 106 is charged to a high voltage. Upon contact with ?lm
`108 a current will ?ow to ground via ?lm 108. switch 314
`and resistor 316. Resistor 316 has a resistance of. e.g.. 10K
`ohm. The voltage across the series connection of switch 314
`and resistor 316 is fed to controller 220 via an AID converter
`(not shown) and is indicative of contact detection. Filter
`control means 122 thereupon is enabled to raise the e?’ective
`the cut-off frequency. e.g.. by control of the duty cycle of the
`signal governing switches 120. Thereupon. coordinate
`detection is started as explained above and after the ?rst
`samples being acquired the effective cut-o? frequency is
`lowered to well below the sampling frequency.
`Filter control means 122 here is shown as a separate
`feature. Note that ?lter control means 122. and the control of
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`6
`switches 302. 304. 306. 308. 314 may all be integrated in
`controller 220 comprising dedicated control software.
`What is claimed is:
`1. A data processing system with a data input device for
`enabling entering respective data into the system upon
`user-interaction at respective ?rst and second coordinates
`relative to the device. and wherein the device includes:
`generating means for generating signzds indicative of the
`?rst and second coordinates;
`low-pass ?lter means for ?ltering of the signals;
`sampling means for sampling of the ?ltered signals with
`a sampling frequency;
`characterized in that
`the sampling means comprises:
`?rst holding means for holding a ?rst sample associated
`with a value of the ?rst coordinate;
`second holding means for holding a second sample
`associated with a value of the second coordinate;
`the device comprises ?lter control means operative to set
`a cut-0E frequency of the ?lter means initially to
`substantially at least the sampling frequency upon
`detection of the user-interacn'on and to subsequently
`decrease the cut-off frequency substantially below the
`sampling frequency.
`2. The system of claim 1. wherein the ?rst and second
`holding means are functionally and selectively merged with
`the low-pass ?lter means via ?rst and second switches
`controlled via ?rst and second control signals. respectively.
`3. The system of claim 1. wherein the ?lter control means
`comprises means for temporarily having the cut-off fre
`quency raised to or above the sampling frequency at initial
`ization of the user-interaction.
`4. The system of claim 2. wherein the ?lter control means
`comprises means for temporarily having an effective cut-o?’
`frequency raised to or above the sampling frequency at
`initialization of the user-interaction. the means being opera
`tive to control a duty-cycle of the control signals.
`5. The system of claim 1. wherein the ?lter control means
`is operative to control the cut-off frequency in dependence
`on a noise-related quantity.
`6. The system of claim 5. wherein:
`the device includes a pair of parts operative to be brought
`into electrical contact with one another under user
`interaction for enabling generation of the signals
`indicative of the ?rst and second coordinates of the
`contact relative to the device;
`the ?lter control means controls the cut-o? frequency in
`dependence on a contact resistance of said parts.
`7. The system of claim 6. wherein the ?lter control means
`comprises the contact resistance being functionally inte
`grated with the low-pass ?lter means.
`8. The system of claim 6. wherein the ?lter control means
`comprises means for temporarily having the cut-off fre
`quency raised to or above the sampling frequency at initial
`ization of contact between the parts.
`9. The system of claim 8. wherein the ?lter control means
`comprises means for temporarily having an eifective cut-o?‘
`frequency raised to or above the sampling frequency at
`contact between the parts being initialized. the means being
`operative to control a duty-cycle of the control signals.
`10. A data input device for use in the system of claim 1.
`11. A data processing system with a data input device for
`enabling entering respective data into the system upon
`user-interaction at a coordinate relative to the device. and
`wherein the device includes:
`
`GOOGLE Ex. 1017
`Google v. Philips
`
`

`

`5,767,458
`
`8
`
`7
`generating means for generating signal indicative of the
`wofdillate;
`low-pass ?lter means for ?ltering of the signal;
`_
`.
`.
`,
`sampling means for sampling of the ?ltered slgnal Wlth a 5
`sainpling fr?qucncy- Wh?rein the samPling means 00m‘
`P115651
`holding means for holding a sample associated with a
`value of the coordinate; and
`
`wherein
`the device comprises ?lter control means operative to set
`a cut'o? frequency of the ?lter means initially to
`substantially at least the sampling frequency upon
`detection of the user-interaction and to subsequently
`decrease the cut-off frequency substantially below the
`sampling frequency.
`
`*
`
`* * *
`
`*
`
`GOOGLE Ex. 1017
`Google v. Philips
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket