`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`
`GOOGLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
`Patent Owner
`__________________
`
`INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. RE44,913
`Case IPR2017-00386
`__________________
`
`GOOGLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Google Inc. (“Google”) objects pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`
`IPR2017-00436
`Patent No. RE44,913
`
`
`§ 42.64(b)(1) and the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) to the admissibility of
`
`exhibits served by Patent Owner Koninklijke Philips N.V. on September 18, 2017.
`
`The exhibits objected to, and grounds for Google’s objections, are listed below.
`
`I.
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF CHALLENGED EVIDENCE AND GROUNDS
`FOR OBJECTIONS
`A. Exhibit 2009
`Exhibit 2009 purports to be a monograph discussing the history of
`
`typewriters. Google objects to Exhibit 2009 under FRE 901, 1002, and 1003. It
`
`has not been authenticated and lacks proper foundation under FRE 901, is not self-
`
`authenticating under 902, and is not a “duplicate” as defined by FRE 1001(e).
`
`Exhibit 2003 is therefore inadmissible under FRE 901, 1002, and 1003.
`
`Additionally, Google objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay under FRE
`
`802. Google also objects to Exhibit 2009 under FRE 402 and 403 because it is
`
`irrelevant and its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of
`
`wasting time in this compressed proceeding. Exhibit 2009 appears to be dated
`
`October 6, 2011—after the priority date of the ’913 patent—and bears no relevance
`
`to the graphical user interface presented in Sakata II or how a POSA would have
`
`been motivated to modify that user interface as of the June 30, 2001 priority date.
`
`Therefore, Exhibit 2008 should be excluded under FRE 402 and 403.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2010
`
`B.
`Exhibit 2010 purports to be excerpts from a product manual, but it is
`
`IPR2017-00436
`Patent No. RE44,913
`
`
`incomplete, and appears to be missing various pieces of text. It should be
`
`introduced in complete form under FRE 106. Google also objects to Exhibit 2002
`
`under FRE 402 and 403 because it is irrelevant and its probative value is
`
`substantially outweighed by the danger of wasting time in this compressed
`
`proceeding. Exhibit 2010 illustrates a graphical keyboard from a Nokia device but
`
`bears no relevance to the graphical user interface presented in Sakata II, the
`
`secondary character options presented in that interface, or how a POSA would
`
`have been motivated to modify that user interface as of the June 30, 2001 priority
`
`date. Therefore, Exhibit 2008 should be excluded under FRE 402 and 403.
`
`Google also objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay under FRE 802.
`
`C. Exhibit 2014
`Exhibit 2014 purports to be a printout of a Wikipedia webpage titled “List of
`
`Japanese typographic symbols.” Google objects to Exhibit 2014 under FRE 901,
`
`1002, and 1003. It has not been authenticated and lacks proper foundation under
`
`FRE 901, is not self-authenticating under 902, and is not a “duplicate” as defined
`
`by FRE 1001(e). Exhibit 2014 is therefore inadmissible under FRE 901, 1002, and
`
`1003. Additionally, Google objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay under
`
`FRE 802.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`D. Exhibit 2015
`Exhibit 2015 purports to be a printout of an entry from a computer
`
`IPR2017-00436
`Patent No. RE44,913
`
`
`dictionary. Google objects to Exhibit 2015 under FRE 901, 1002, and 1003. It has
`
`not been authenticated and lacks proper foundation under FRE 901, is not self-
`
`authenticating under 902, and is not a “duplicate” as defined by FRE 1001(e).
`
`Exhibit 2015 is therefore inadmissible under FRE 901, 1002, and 1003.
`
`Additionally, Google objects to this exhibit as inadmissible hearsay under FRE
`
`802.
`
`
`II. CONCLUSION
`To the extent Patent Owner fails to correct the defects identified above,
`
`Google may file a motion to exclude under 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(c).
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 25, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` / Aaron Maurer / /
`Aaron Maurer
`Williams & Connolly LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 434-5282
`Facsimile: (202) 434-5029
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Google Inc.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00436
`Patent No. RE44,913
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`(37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e) and 42.105(a))
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on September 25, 2017, the above-
`
`captioned Google’s Objections to Evidence was served by delivering a copy via
`
`electronic mail upon the following attorneys of record for the Patent Owner:
`
`Justin J. Oliver, Reg. No. 44,986
`JOliver@fchs.com
`Jason Dorsky, Reg No. 64,710
`JDorsky@fchs.com
`Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104
`
` / Aaron Maurer / /
`Aaron Maurer
`Williams & Connolly LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 434-5282
`Facsimile: (202) 434-5029
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Google Inc.
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 25, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`