throbber

`
`- Completely undated
`- 4000+ Definitions
`0 000+ Illustrations-
`
`
`
`]ADE CLAYTON
`
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`IPR2017-00382
`Nvidia v. Polaris
`Polaris Ex. 2004
`
`

`

`Cataloging—in—Publication Data is on file with the Library of Congress.
`
`McGraw-Hill
`A Division ofTheMcGraw-Hill Companies
`
`g‘Z
`
`Copyright © 2001 by The McGraw—Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United
`States of America. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of
`this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a data
`base or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
`
`1234567890 DOC/DOC 0765432
`
`P/N 1395091
`Part of ISBN 0-07—1395083
`
`The sponsoring editorfor this book was Stephen S. Chapman and the production supervisor
`was Sherri Souffrance. It was set in ITC Century Light by Techbooks.
`
`Printed and bound by R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company.
`
`® This book is printed on recycled, acid—free paper containing a minimum of 50% recycled
`de—inked fiber.
`
`McGraw—Hill books are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promo—
`tions, or for use in corporate training programs. For more information, please write to the Director of
`Special Sales, Professional Publishing, McGraw—Hill, Two Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121-2298, or
`contact your local bookstore.
`
`l
`
`'
`
`,
`‘l
`
`
`
`Information contained in this work has been obtained by The McGraw—Hill Companies,
`Inc. (“McGraw—Hill”) from sources believed to be reliable. However, neither McGraw—Hill
`nor its authors guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information published
`herein and neither McGraw—Hill nor its authors shall be responsible for any errors,
`omissions, or damages arising out of use of this information. This work is published with
`the understanding that McGraw—Hill and its authors are supplying information but are not
`attempting to render engineering or other professional services. If such services are
`
`required, the assistance of an appropriate professional should be sought. ,
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`IPR2017-00382
`Nvidia v. Polaris
`Polaris Ex. 2004
`
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`IPR2017-00382
`Nvidia v. Polaris
`Polaris Ex. 2004
`
`

`

`International Dialing
`
`315
`
`of co—locations. Alarm companies like to have their alarm—signaling equipment located in
`the local central office for security and convenience of connecting alarm circuits. Long—
`distance companies co—locate with local telephone companies as well.
`A virtual coelocation is an interconnection agreement and a physical place where tele—
`phone companies hand off calls and services to each other. This is usually done between
`a CLEC and an RBOC. A virtual co—location is when telephone company A (the CLEO) re—
`quests that their phone company’s network be connected to telephone company B’s (the
`RBOC’s) network. Telephone company B charges company A lots of money. Company B
`owns, installs, and maintains the equipment. To company A, the interconnection is virtual,
`because they never physically do anything to it when and after it is installed. Company B
`likes this, because company A does not get free access to their premises.
`
`Interarea Routing The term used to describe routing between two or more logical ar—
`eas. Compare with Intra—Area Routing.
`
`Interface A device or software program that connects two separate entities. The two en-
`tities can be virtual (software), hardware/electronic devices, or distinguish a separation
`of responsibility between two parties (telephone network interface).
`
`Interior Gateway Protocol Also known as Link State Routing Protocol, Distributed
`Routing Protocol, and Shortest Path First. An interior gateway routing protocol is a
`methodology used in router protocol design. This methodology enables routers within an
`autonomous network (i.e., corporate LAN) to identify each other and the status of their
`port connections. Interior gateway routing protocols create three databases within a
`router’s memory: a neighboring router database, a link database, and a routing table. The
`routing table is created by applying Dykstra’s algorithm to the first two databases. The
`two most widely used interior gateway routing protocol is Open Shortest Path First
`(OSPF). See also OSPF.
`
`Intermediate Session Routing (ISR) The first routing algorithm used in APPN
`(Advanced Peer—to—Peer Networking). ISR (where still used) provides node-to-node
`connection—oriented routing. Network outages cause sessions to fail because ISR can—
`not provide nondisruptive rerouting around a failure. ISR was replaced by HPR (High—
`Performance Routing), which has been made obsolete by newer routing algorithms
`that have been incorporated into link-state, distance—vector, and hybrid routing
`protocols.
`
`Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) An OS] (Open—System Inter—
`connect) link—state routing protocol that is based on DECnet Phase—V routing. One ver—
`sion of 18-18, called Integrated [S—IS, supports lP-based networks. For more information
`on link-state protocols, see Link—State Algorithm.
`|PR2017-00382
`Page 3 of 3
`Nvidia v. Polaris
`
`I
`.
`IEolariaE§ 2,904
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Internatlonal Dlahng To dial international long distance from the m e
`ta es, dial.
`Oll—county code city code number. For a listing of country codes, see Appendix B. To
`
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`IPR2017-00382
`Nvidia v. Polaris
`Polaris Ex. 2004
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket