throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`IMAGE PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2017-00353
`Patent 8,983,134
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION OF ROSE CORDERO PREY UNDER
`37 C.F.R. §42.10(c)
`
`

`
`    
`
`    
`
`    
`
`    
`
`       
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Patent Owner respectfully requests the pro
`
`
`
`hac vice admission of Rose Cordero Prey as backup counsel for Patent Owner in
`
`the current proceedings. A declaration made by Ms. Prey in support of this motion
`
`is submitted herewith as Exhibit 2005.
`
`1. Statement of Facts
`
`1. Ms. Prey is a partner at the law firm of Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP.
`
`2. Ms. Prey is an experienced litigation attorney. Ms. Prey has been
`
`litigating patent cases for over 10 years, and has experience litigating
`
`patent infringement cases in many district courts and before the U.S.
`
`International Trade Commission. Among her experience in patent
`
`litigation matters, Ms. Prey has been counsel at trial, hearings, and with
`
`respect to patent-related summary judgment proceedings and other
`
`patent-related hearings and pleadings concerning, inter alia, patent
`
`validity, claim construction, and infringement issues.
`
`3. Ms. Prey received a Bachelor’s of Science degree in Mathematics, with
`
`a minor in Physics, in 2001.
`
`4. Ms. Prey has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue
`
`in this proceeding. Ms. Prey is trial counsel for Patent Owner and has
`
`been actively involved in all aspects of the Eastern District of Texas
`
`court proceeding against Petitioner involving the same patents and
`
`

`

`technology (Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung
`
`Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., 2:16-cv-00505-JRG).
`
`5. Ms. Prey is a member in good standing of the State Bar of New York as
`
`well as the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New
`
`York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
`
`York, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas,
`
`and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
`
`6. Ms. Prey has never been suspended or disbarred from practice before
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`7. No application of Ms. Prey for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body has ever been denied.
`
`8. No sanctions or contempt citations have been imposed against Ms. Prey
`
`by any court or administrative body.
`
`9. Ms. Prey has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of
`
`Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations..
`
`10. Ms. Prey understands that she will be subject to the USPTO Rules of
`
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`

`

`
`
`11. Ms. Prey has applied to appear pro hac vice in three proceedings before
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office in the last three (3)
`
`years, Micron Technology, Inc. and Micron Memory Japan, Inc. v.
`
`Massachusetts Institute of Technology, IPR2015-01087; Apple Inc., v.
`
`Limestone Memory Systems LLC, IPR2016-01561; and Apple Inc. v.
`
`Limestone Memory Systems LLC, IPR2016-01567.
`
`12. Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Ms. Prey are being
`
`concurrently filed in the following related Inter Partes Review
`
`proceedings:
`
`i. IPR2017-00347
`
`ii. IPR2017-00336
`
`iii. IPR2017-00355
`
`iv. IPR2017-00357
`
`
`
`

`

`2. Conclusions
`
`
`
`For the reasons stated above, Patent Owner respectfully submits that there is
`
`good cause for the Board to recognize Rose Cordero Prey pro hac vice during the
`
`/s/ Chris J. Coulson
`Chris J. Coulson (Reg. No. 61,771)
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, New York 1004-1007
`Tel: (212) 425-7200
`Fax: (212) 425-5288
`chriscoulson@andrewskurthkenyon.com
`
`Michael Zachary (pro hac vice)
`MichaelZachary@AndrewsKurthKenyon.com
`Mark Chapman (pro hac vice)
`MarkChapman@AndrewsKurthKenyon.com
`Rose Cordero Prey (pro hac vice)
`RosePrey@AndrewsKurthKenyon.com
`
`
`
`proceeding.
`
`Date: April 14, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on April 14,
`
`2017, the foregoing Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Rose
`
`Cordero Prey is being served via electronic mail upon the following counsel of
`
`record for Petitioner:
`
`John Kappos (Reg. No. 37,861) jkappos@omm.com
`
`Nick Whilt (Reg. No. 72,081) nwhilt@omm.com
`
`Brian M. Cook (Reg. No. 59,356) bcook@omm.com
`
`IPTSAMSUNGOMM@omm.com
`
`
`
`/s/ Chris J. Coulson
`Chris J. Coulson
`Registration No. 61,771
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004
`(212) 425-7200
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Image Processing Technologies, LLC
`

`
`
`
`
`
`    
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket