throbber
The Riele: Manualeffipinning
`Volume 1
`
`- -
`U- T- l
`- -
`
`Werner Klein
`
`The Rieter Manual of Spinning
`
`1u'nlume '1— Teehnelngyr of Short—staple Spinning
`
`0001
`
`Bedgear2008
`
`Fredman v. Bedgear
`IPR2017-00351
`
`0001
`
`Bedgear 2008
`Fredman v. Bedgear
`IPR2017-00351
`
`

`

`Publisher
`Rieter Machine Works Ltd.
`
`(opyrlght
`moi-u by Rieter Machine Works Ltd.,
`Klosterstrasse 20. CH-BtiOEi Wintherthur,
`www.rieter.com
`
`Part of this content provided by The Textile Institute. Used by permission.
`
`Cover page
`Cotton plant
`
`Available Volumesl'Edition:
`
`Volume 1 - Technology:r of Short-staple Spinning
`ISBN 13 3-95231T3-l-4 1' ISBN 13 978-3-95231T3-1-0
`
`Volume 2 - Blowmom 8. llIarding
`ISBN 13 3-952317’3-2-2f15BN 13 9?B-3-95231T3-2-?
`
`Volume 3 - Spinning Preparation
`ISBN 13 3-95231?3-3-OIISBN 13 978-3352318345:
`
`
`
`Volume ti - Ring Spinning
`[SEN 13 3-95231Y3-4-9HSBN13 9T8-3-95231ra-4-1
`
`Volume 5 - Rotor Spinning
`ISBN 13 3-95231T3—5-i" i' ISBN 13 9?8—3—95231?3—5—8
`
`Volume 6 — Alternative Spinning Systems
`ISBN 13 3-95231T3-6-5 ,1' ISBN 13 9?8-3-9523l?3-6-5
`
`Volume 1' - Processing of Man-Made Fibres
`ISBN 12] 3-952311’3-76 ,I' ISBN 13 9T8-3-9523li3-Y-2
`
`Collectors Edition - all Volumes (Vol. 1-?)
`ISBN 13 3-95231T3-Uv6 1' ISBN 13 978-3352317303
`
`0002
`
`0002
`
`

`

`The Rivtcr Manual Ul Sninrinfi. Volume I . Technology at Shetl‘flaolc Sninnl-mt
`
`13
`
`Fiber fineness influences primarily:
`- spinning limit:
`. yarn strength:
`- yarn evenness:
`
`- yarn fullness:
`- drape ofthe fabric:
`- luster:
`- handle:
`
`- productivity of the process.
`
`Productivity is influenced via the end-breakage rate. the number
`of turns per inch required in the yarn {giving improvement of the
`handle}. and generally better Spinning conditions. In the produc-
`tion of blends. it must be borne in mind that, at least in conven—
`
`tional ring spinning processes, fine fibers accumulate toa greater
`extent in the yarn core and coarser fibers at the periphery.
`Blending of fine cotton fibers with coarse synthetic fibers would
`produce a yarn with an externally synthetic fiber character.
`
`1.2.2. Specification of fineness
`
`It'lfith the exception of wool and hair fibers. fiber fineness can-
`not be specified by relerence to diameter as in the case of steel
`wire. because the section is seldom cirwlar and is thus not
`
`easily measurable. As in the case of yarns and fibers, fineness
`is usually specified by the relation ofmass [weight] to length:
`5
`o‘
`tear: —ma5 {g}
`or other = —mfl${9':
`fength (km)
`irm
`
`Whereas for man-made fibers dteit is used almost exclu-
`
`sively. the Micronaire value is used worldwide for cotton,
`The fineness scale is as follows:
`
`MicWiLLIE
`
`FINENESS
`
`upto 3.1
`
`i very fine
`
`
`
`Conversion factor: dtr-ur = Mic :- 0.3984
`[heavily dependent on degree of maturity].
`
`it should be remembEred. howiaver. that the Micronaire value
`
`does not always represent the actual fineness of the fibers.
`Owing to the use of the air-throughflow method for measur-
`ing the Mi value. for example. a low average value is obtained
`where there is a high proportion of immature fibers. and this
`does not correspond to the true value for the spinnable fibers.
`
`1. RAW MATERIAL A5 A FAETOR
`
`INFLUENCING SPINNING
`lCharacteristics of the raw material
`
`1.1.
`
`Raw material represents about 50 - "f5 '36 of the manufactur-
`ing cost of a short-staple yarn. This fact alone is sufficient
`to indicate the significance of the raw material for the yarn
`producer. The influence becomes still more apparent when
`the ease in processing one type of fiber material is com—
`pared with the difficulties. annoyance. additional effort.
`and the decline in productivity and quality associated with
`another similar material. But hardly any spinner can afford
`to use a problem-free raw material because it would nor—
`mally be too expensive.
`Adapting to the expected difficulties requires an intimate
`knowledge of the starting material and its behavior in pro-
`cessing and subsequent stages.
`Optimal conditions can be obtained only through mastery
`of the raw material. Admittedly. however. the best theoreti—
`cal knowledge will not help much if the material is already
`at the limits of spinnability or beyond, Excessive economy
`in relation to raw material usually does not reduce costs
`and often increases them owing to deterioration of process-
`ability in the spinning mill.
`As an introduction to the subject of raw material. the fol-
`lowing pages will sketch out several relationships which
`are important for the yarn producer. Dnly cotton will be
`dealt with here. Man-made fibers will be dealt with sepa-
`rately in another volume.
`
`1.2. Fiberlineness
`1.2.1. The influence of fineness
`
`Fineness is normally one ofthe three most important
`fiber characteristics. A multitude of fibers in the cross-
`
`section provide not only high strength but also better
`distribution in the yarn. The fineness determines how
`many fibers are present in the cross-section of a yarn
`of given thickness. Additional fibers in the cross-sec—
`tion provide not only additional strength but also better
`evenness in the yarn.
`About thirty fibers are needed at the minimum in the
`yarn cross-section. but there are usually over 100.
`One hundred is approximately the tower limit for
`almost all new spinning processes. This indicates that
`fineness will become still more important in the future.
`
`0003
`
`0003
`
`

`

`The Rivtcr Manual of Spinning. I-'t:-lurI'II.'
`
`I . "thud“! cistern-stool: solnnI-na
`
`“9
`
`11.3. Fiber disposition
`
`The yarn buyers expect that the yarn they receive is (besides
`other quality features} even in structure and appearance.
`However. an even yarn is achievable only by fulfilling some
`preconditions. These preconditions are very easy to explain.
`but very hard to obtain: in every yarn cross-section of the
`Iwhole yarn length there should always be:
`- the same number of individual fibers:
`- the same number of fibers of every group of the same
`quality parameter lie. length. Fig. 1+9 afb]. fineness.
`thickness. etc.
`
`
`
`Fig. 49 — The ideal arrangement offibers ofdil‘lerent lengths in the yarn
`a. the distribution within the yarn strand;
`ti. the length grnups extracted group-wise from the strand.
`
`11.1%. The order of fibers within the yarn
`
`Also expected is that the yarn has optimal strength.
`Nowadays yarns obtain their strength. almost without
`exception. from twisting. Therefore the strength is. beyond
`doubt. highly dependent on the height of the twist. but also
`on a large area ol fiber-contact, and that again means for
`the fibers:
`
`- high degree ofstretching-out (straightening);
`- highest attainable degrea of paralleliSm;
`- binding-in of the whole fiber. including if possible both
`fiber ends, into the yarn structure.
`
`Furthermore. in yarns which have not been produced by
`using adhesives. the helical winding of all. or at least some
`(wrap yarns] of the fibers is of decisive importance. since
`ultimately the stability and strength of the structure are
`derived from the pressure towards the interior exerted by
`fiber windings. which are created by thetwist.
`One reason for the lower strength of rotor-spun yarn relative
`to ring—spun yarn is the lower degree of parallelization and
`the lower degree of straightening (fiber hooks} of the fibers
`in rotor-spun yarn.
`
`7. YARN FORMATION
`7.1. Assembly of fibers to make up a yarn
`11.1. Arrangement of the fibers
`
`The characteristics of a yarn are strongly dependent upon
`the characteristics of its fibers. but they are equally depend-
`ent upon the structure of the yarn itself. The following fac-
`tors are especially significant:
`- the number of fibers in the yarn cross—section;
`. fiber disposition:
`- fiber alignment;
`. position of the fibers in the strand {e.g. long fibers
`inside. short outside);
`- binding—in [fully or only partly bound—in):
`- overall structure;
`- twist.
`
`11.2. Number oi fibers in the yarn cross-section
`
`This determines. among other things. strength, evenness,
`handle. insulating capacity. thread-breakage rate. and the
`spinning limit of the raw material. Accordingly, there are
`lower limits to the numberoffibers in the cross-section.
`
`as follows {for normal conditions}:
`
`33 fibers
`
`Cotton yarns
`ing-spun yarn:
`carded
`F5 fibers
`
`Synthetic fiber yarns
`
`I
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`otor—spunyam:
`
`
`rug-spun yarn:
`
`
`
`Icarcled
`
`100 fibers
`
`50 fibers
`
`. 100 fibers
`
`rotor-spunyar .
`: carded
`
`
`The spinning limit can then be calculated approximately
`by transposition of the equation:
`
`TEXyou:
`
`fur.-
`tee .,
`
`J'T‘-
`’
`
`to ive
`g
`
`tex
`
`W'" = r1r 2' texfiw
`
`where ”I is the number of fibers. However, this formula does
`not take into account other parameters. such as fiber length.
`coefficient of friction. etc., which also affect the spinning limit.
`If it is desired to ascertain the average fiber fineness
`in a blended yarn. the following formula can be used:
`
`to
`
`prxtea +p. Hex
`
`100
`
`=—‘’ '
`
`Falter
`
`where p represents the proportion offibers as a percentage.
`and the index it represents one component and the indexythe
`other.
`
`0004
`
`0004
`
`

`

`5E}
`
`The clic'tt'r Manual of Snin'n'ns .VoliJ'nc 1 .Technolon o‘f Short-slash Spin-tins
`
`Looking at the first two items. the Following operations are
`responsible for imparting this order:
`- Carding [the high degree of longitudinal orientation
`obtained on the main cylinder is, however, nullified to
`a large extent by the doffer}.
`- Combing (here. however. parallelizing is a side-effect.
`which is not always desired to this extent].
`- Drafting [this is the most usual method of imparting
`order. since each drafting of the fiber masses is accom-
`pa nied by straightening].
`- Floating of individual fibers in a strong air current
`(for example, in the feed tube of the rotor-spinning
`machine).
`- Deliberate collection of fibers. e.g. in the rotor.
`
`11.5. The positions of the fibers in the yarn structure
`11.5.1. Ring-spun yarns
`
`Owing to the twist. all or some of the fibers take up the
`required helical disposition. The number of fibers affected
`by the twist. and the degree of winding. are strongly depen-
`dent upon the spinning process. in ring-spun yarns, twist-
`ing takes place from the outside inwards. At the periphery
`[the outer sheath .4. Fig. 50], owing to the greater degree
`of winding, the fibers have a lesser inclination, to = angle
`between the fibers and the axis of the yarn} than in the
`interior of the yarn {the core 8]. Since the fibers become
`steadily less tightly wound towards the core. ring-spun yarn
`may be said to have sheath—twist. Under loading. the outer
`layers will tend to take the radial forces and the inner lay-
`ers will tend to take the axial forces. However. by increasing
`pressure inwards. the radial forces reinforce atrial resistance
`to sliding apart of the fibers.
`
`Ring-spun ‘I’arri
`
`Open-End ‘I'arn
`
`
`
`classic
`
`. compact
`
`. rotorspun
`
`. fricllon spun
`
`/-l .,
`
`4
`
`P:
`
`a
`
`Fig. 50 — The twist structure in ring-spun yarn [22]
`
`Accordingly. fully twisted yarns with sheath-twist have high
`tensile strength but are not so resistant to abrasion. Under
`abrasion the outer. highly tensioned fibers are destroyed.
`Since these fibers hold the yarn together, the strand loses
`its cohesion. Hairiness on the yarn surface is mainly caused
`by protruding shorter fibers.
`
`7.1.5.2. Open-end spun yarns
`
`In contrast to ring spinning. twisting during rotor spinning
`takes place from the inside outwards. The rotating. brush-like
`open yarn end (C, Fig. 51] first catches fibers in the core and
`then with further rotation gradually takes up fibers towards
`the periphery. In the interior, where the fibers cannot avoid
`the twist, the strand becomes more compact but also some-
`what harder. On the other hand. towards the eitterior, com-
`
`pactness and hardness fall off to an increasing degree, since
`here the fibers are able partially to avoid twisting-in.
`
`hit-let 'i'arn
` et spun. two nozzles.
`vortex spun. one nozzle
`false twist process
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`Wrap 'i'arn
`filament wrapped
`
`less parallel.
`parallel without twist
`parallel.
`less parallel.
`parallelwithouttwist
`:parallelwithouttwist
`
`
`
`
`helical
`
`helical
`: helical
`
`
`
`Er %of fibers twisted
`
`
`parallel.
`f more random.
`ess parallel.
`a;attest;a;""“""'""
`2sagapasta
`helical
`around core in spllals
`.
`helical
`_
`lesslinnsted
`around core in spirals
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`medium
`very good
`good
`- very good
`
`
`
`compact
`compact
`very compact,
`compact
`
`
`rnund
`
`
`
`
`so i!
`medlum to had
`handle
`
`
`noticeable
`hairiness:
`low to medium
`very low
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Table at — Shows roughly the differences in structure arislng from the spinning process
`{see also Fig. Sci}
`
`- medium
`
`-
`
`compact to
`
`Fiber disposition:
`in the core
`parallel.
`
`helical
`
`in the sheath
`parallel.
`
`; helical
`Fiber orientation:
`
`parallelism:
`compactness:
`
`good
`compact
`
`0005
`
`0005
`
`

`

`The thcr Manual Ul Spinrirlfi
`
`I-'t',|urrII.'
`
`t
`
`. Technology ol Shurl‘flaole Snmnl-M.
`
`51
`
`\\
`
`A further disadvantage of the loose outer layers is their sensi-
`tivity to axial rubbing. Since these open layers are not firmly
`secured in the core. they tend to accumulate in small knots
`during passage ofthe yarn over edges. guide elements. etc. As
`far as possibler open-end spun yarns should not be rewound.
`
`1232222232"-B 222
`
`N
`c 1a..
`_-="';=_==_=T-_——:=.
`
`?.1.5.3. Wrap yarns
`
`Fig. 51 — Bindlng-in oi the fibers in open-end splnning
`
`
`
`Fig. 52 - Yarn iorniation in the rotor
`
`Typical characteristics of this so-called core-twist are there-
`fore a harder handle accompanied by a lower strength
`than is obtained with sheath—twist. since the outer layers
`have relatively little twist and can thus contribute little
`to strength. However. abrasion-resistance is often better.
`Removal ol outer fibers due to abrasion has little effect.
`since these fibers dict not create much strength anyhow.
`In rotor—spun yarns. this outer layer exhibits other peculiar—
`ities. One of these is the presence of wrap fibers. These are
`fibers which fly directly onto the fully created yarn as the
`rotor passes under the feed passage. By the further rota-
`tion of the yarn in the rotor they are wrapped around the
`already spun yarn like the band on a cigar. This is atypical
`characteristic of rotor-spun yarn.
`Another peculiarity is a thin outer layer of fibers with
`hardly any twist, or even with twist in the reverse sense.
`This arises from the false twist between the navel [Fig 52, T]
`and the binding—in zone {A}. In the latter. during each rota-
`tion of the rotor. new fibers join on to the already well
`twisted fiber strand. These latecomers receive only a [rac-
`tion ofthe desired twist level. Ilthis low twist is lessthan
`the false-twist effect. the fibers are twisted in the reverse
`
`sense during cancellation of the false twist [reverse twist—
`ing} at the navel, and are thus wrapped around the other
`fibers with reverse twist.
`
`0006
`
`IWrap yarns consist for the most part of fibers arranged in
`parallel without any twist (Fig. 53). These form the very
`thick core. Synthetic filament or staple fiber of the same
`kind as the core material is wrapped around this core but
`forms a small proportion of the fiber material. It the thread
`is wrapped with filament. it will have high strength. since
`the fibers themselves are stretched out and arranged paral-
`lel and are pressed closely together. The filament also con-
`tributes some of the strength. Accordingly. for a given yarn
`strength. Fewer fibers are required in the cross-section.
`
`___.
`-:_
`
`‘-
`
`_._.-__
`
`.-—-
`
`_.
`
`ra-
`
`_.....__
`
`_..
`::__‘_ '
`
`_
`
`—_-:
`
`Fig. 53 - Bundled yarns (wrap yarns)
`
`11.5.13. Air-jet Yarns
`
`If. the core fibers are wrapped only with fibers of finite
`length (staplefibers). as in false—twist spinning (air—jet
`spinning and Dref 3}. then the yarn strength is lower than
`that of ring-spun yarn because the relatively short fibers
`cannot hold the structure of the yarn together in an optimal
`fashion. A minimum fiber length is required for production
`of such threads. At present. therefore. the false—twist pro-
`cess is suitable mainly for the spinning of man-made fibers,
`blends of cotton and man-made fibers. or combed cotton.
`
`Airiet spinning systems using one nozzle. like vortex-spun
`allow higher percentages of wrap fibers. resulting in better
`yarn properties and higher productivity.
`
`7.1.6. Yarn structure
`
`One aspECt of structure is the visual appearance. created
`solely by the peripheral layer of the yarn. and a second
`aspect is the internal and external make-up. Yarn structures
`are very variable. The difierences are partly deliberately
`caused. depending on the intended use of the yarn, but for
`the most part they are predetermined by the means avail-
`able. For example. it is difficult to produce a yarn equiva—
`lent to a ring-spun yarn by the new spinning processes
`
`0006
`
`

`

`TtIt' “ticlt'r Manual of Spin'n'ng .VoIU'IIc 1 .Tothnolon of Short-slant: sate-tins
`
`— and the ring-spun yarn still represents the standard of
`comparison [Table It}.
`The yarn structure is dependent primarily upon the raw
`material. spinning process, spinning unit, machine,
`machine settings, twist, etc. The structure can be open or
`closed; voluminous or compact: smooth or rough or hairy:
`soft or hard; round or flat; thin or thick, etc.
`But yarn structure is not simply appearance. It has
`a greater or lesser influence on:
`- handle:
`
`- strength;
`- elongation;
`- insulating capacity:
`- covering power:
`- ability to resist wear, damage, strains, etc.:
`- resistance to abrasion;
`
`- ability to accept dye:
`- tendency towards longitudinal bunching of fibers:
`- wearing comfort. etc.
`
`Ring yarn
`
`'
`
`Ell. E. rotor yarn
`
`Wrap - spun yarn Mir-gel - yarn
`
`G. E. friclion yarn
`
`Fig. 551 - Differences in the yarn structure for various spinning processes
`[drawings without attention to hairiness)
`
`7.2. Fiber migration
`
`Owing to their different characteristics. the fibers take
`up different positions in the body of the yarn. Grouping
`arises mostly during drawing. Thus. long fibers are often
`located in the core, since they exhibit more cohesive fric-
`tion. and therefore higher resistance to the draft. and
`remain in the interior. Short fibers are often found on
`
`the yarn exterior. This tendency is reinforced by fiber
`migration (wandering of the fibers}. since the fibers do
`not always stay in the positions they first take up. For
`example. if any traction of power {even minimal} acts on
`the yarn. highly tensioned fibers of the outer layers press
`inward wholly or partly [the fiber ends, for example}.
`In doing so. they press out the lower-tensioned fibers
`
`0007
`
`from the interior. Migration takes place from the sheath
`to the core and vice versa. Such migration is, of course,
`most prevalent during yarn formation but still occurs after
`yarn formation is completed. |u'r'hen the smallest forces are
`exerted on the yarn. e.g. during bending, tensile loading,
`etc.. the persisting tensions in the fibers constituting the
`yarn lead to continuation of the process of fiber migration
`even after the completion of yarn formation. For example.
`the short fibers work their way to the surface and are then
`partly rubbed off. Moreover, some fibers in the body ofthe
`yarn lose their helical dispositions during fiber migration:
`this effect is more prominent the shorter the fibers and the
`more random their arrangement.
`In addition to its dependence on length. fiber migration is
`dependent upon degree of elasticity, stiffness, fineness,
`crimp. etc. Short. coarse. stiff fibers move out towards the
`sheath while long. fine, flexible fibers move towards the
`core. Strongly crimped fibers are also found predominantly
`in the sheath. since they can exert greater resistance to
`binding-in. Fiber migration should be adequately taken into
`account in determining the composition of blends.
`
`Impartingstrength
`13.
`7.3.1. Possibilities for imparting strength
`
`In order to obtain strength in the yarn. which consists of
`individual fibers of relatively short length. the inherent
`strength of one fiber must be made wholly or partly trans-
`ferable to another. In principle. there are two alterna-
`tives: adhesives and twist.
`
`Total exploitation of the inherent strength of the fibers
`can be achieved only by using adhesives, as was done, for
`example, in the Twilo process. The adhesive effect can be
`produced by means of adhesive substances or adhesive
`fibers [polyvinyl-alcohol fibers). Since this process can be
`used only for a small market segment. twisting of the fiber
`strand remains the sole possibility for imparting strength.
`even for the future.
`
`The extension of the fibers that arises during twisting
`leads, via the associated fiber tension, to increased pres-
`sure directed towards the yarn interior. i.e. to an increase
`in the frictional forces between the fibers and thus finally to
`the desired, immensely strong coherence of the body of the
`yarn (Fig. 55).
`Fiber strands that are not held together by adhesives can—
`not completely exploit the inherent strength of the individ-
`ualfibers.
`
`Staple fiberyarns held together by twist have a degree of
`exploitation between 25 as and T0 as (normally 3[} - SO ‘56}.
`Possibilities available for producing the required twist are
`true twist, false twist and self-twist l[as in the Repco process].
`
`0007
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket