throbber
PUBLISHED BY
`
`World's largest Science,
`Technology & Medicine
`Open Access book publisher
`
`2,900+
`OPEN ACCESS BOOKS
`
`99,000+
`INTERNATIONAL
`AUTHORS AND EDITORS
`
`92+ MILLION
`DOWNLOADS
`
`BOOKS
`DELIVERED TO
`151 COUNTRIES
`
`AUTHORS AMONG
`TOP 1%
`MOST CITED SCIENTIST
`
`12.2%
`AUTHORS AND EDITORS
`FROM TOP 500 UNIVERSITIES
`
`Selection of our books indexed in the
`Book Citation Index in Web of Science™
`Core Collection (BKCI)
`
`Chapter from the book Non-woven Fabrics
`Downloaded from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/non-woven-fabrics
`
`Interested in publishing with InTechOpen?
`Contact us at book.department@intechopen.com
`
`000001
`
`IPR2017-00351
`Bedgear 2003
`
`

`

`Chapter 4
`
`3D Fabrics for Technical Textile Applications
`
`Kadir Bilisik, Nesrin Sahbaz Karaduman and Nedim Erman Bilisik
`
`Additional information is available at the end of the chapter
`
`http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/61224
`
`Abstract
`
`Two dimensional (2D) woven, braided, knitted and nonwoven fabrics have been used
`for the fabrication of soft and rigid structural composite parts in various industrial
`areas. However, composite structure from biaxial layered fabrics is subject to delami‐
`nation between layers due to the lack of through-the-thickness fibers. It also suffers
`from crimp which reduces the mechanical properties. Triaxial fabrics have an open
`structure and low fiber volume fraction. However, in-plane properties of triaxial fab‐
`rics are more homogeneous due to bias yarns. A 3D woven fabric has multiple layers
`and is free of delamination due to the z-fibers. However, 3D woven fabric has low in-
`plane properties. Three dimensional braided fabrics have multiple layers and they are
`without delamination due to intertwine type out-of-plane interlacement. However,
`they have low transverse properties. A 3D knitted fabric has low fiber volume fraction
`due to its looped structure. A 3D nonwoven fabric is composed of short fibers and is
`reinforced by stitching. However, it shows low mechanical properties due to lack of
`fiber continuity. Various unit cell based models on 3D woven, braided, knitted and
`nonwoven structures were developed to define the geometrical and mechanical prop‐
`erties of these structures. Most of the unit cell based models include micromechanics
`and numerical techniques.
`
`Keywords: Fabric architecture, woven fabric, braided fabric, knitted fabric, 3D non‐
`woven fabric
`
`1. Introduction
`
`The objective of this chapter is to provide up-to-date information on the development of 2D
`and 3D fabric formation and formation techniques particularly on 2D and 3D nonwoven
`fabrics, methods, and properties of nonwoven web, including possible emerging application
`areas. Three-dimensional (3D) fiber structures produced by textile processes are used in
`various industrial applications since they have distinct properties when compared to conven‐
`
`© 2016 The Author(s). Licensee InTech. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
`Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution,
`and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
`
`000002
`
`

`

`82
`
`Non-woven Fabrics
`
`tional materials. The most important application area of 3D textiles, by far, is composite
`industry, where they are used as reinforcement materials in combination with several matrices
`to make textile structural composites. These composites are used extensively in various fields
`such as civil engineering and military industry [1, 2], thanks to their exceptional mechanical
`properties and lower density in comparison with common engineering materials like metals
`and ceramics [3, 4]. Textile structural composites are also superior to conventional unidirec‐
`tional composites when the delamination resistance and damage tolerance are taken into
`account [5]. Textile preforms are readily available, low-cost, and not labor intensive [1]. They
`can be manufactured by weaving, braiding, knitting, stitching, and by using nonwoven
`techniques. Each manufacturing technique has its own advantages and disadvantages in terms
`of specific composite properties and the selection can be made based on the end-use. The
`simplest form of 3D woven preforms is made up of two dimensional (2D) woven fabrics that
`are stacked one on top of another and stitched together in the thickness direction to impart
`through-the-thickness reinforcement. Three-dimensional weaving is another preform produc‐
`tion technique that can be employed to manufacture 3D woven preforms by using specially
`designed automated looms. Near-net shape parts can be produced with this technique which
`substantially reduces the amount of scrap [6, 7]. In-plane properties of 3D woven composites
`are generally low due to through-the-thickness fiber reinforcement, despite of its positive effect
`on out-of-plane properties [8]. Simple 3D braided preform consists of 2D biaxial fabrics that
`are stitched together in the thickness direction depending on a chosen stacking sequence.
`Three-dimensional braiding is a preform technique used in the multidirectional near-net shape
`manufacturing of high damage tolerant structural composites [9, 10]. Three-dimensional
`braiding is highly automated and readily available. Three-dimensional braided preforms are
`fabricated by various techniques such as traditional maypole braiding (slotted horn gear
`matrix), novel 4-step and 2-step braiding (track and column) or more recently 3D rotary
`braiding and multi-step braiding [11, 12]. The fabrication of small sectional 3D braided
`preforms is low-cost, and not labor intensive [1]. However, the fabrication of large 3D braided
`preforms may not be feasible due to position displacement of the yarn carriers. Three-
`dimensional knitted preforms are fabricated by the 3D spatial formation of 2D warp or weft
`knitted fabrics in order to make near-net shape structures like spheres, cones, ellipsoids and
`T-pipe junctions. Three-dimensional knitted composites generally have low mechanical
`properties as a result of their characteristic looped architecture and low fiber volume fraction.
`A 3D nonwoven preform is a web or felt structure consisting of randomly positioned short
`fibers. There is no particular textile-type interlacing or intertwining between the fibers other
`than random entanglements. Through-the-thickness stitching of layered nonwoven webs is
`also possible. The most common methods for nonwoven production are needle-punching,
`stitch-bonding, high-frequency welding, chemical bonding, ultrasound and laminating.
`Recently, electrospinning method is utilized to make nonwoven nano web structure [13]. The
`entanglement type defines the fabric properties such as strength and modulus, flexibility,
`porosity and density [14]. Nonwoven fabrics and their composites display low mechanical
`properties due to fiber discontinuity. Multiaxis knitted preform comprises four fiber sets such
`as +bias, -bias, warp (0˚) and weft (90˚) along with stitching fibers which enhance in-plane
`properties [15]. Multiaxis knitted preform suffer from limitation in fiber architecture, through-
`
`000003
`
`

`

`3D Fabrics for Technical Textile Applications
`http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/61224
`
`83
`
`thickness reinforcement due to the thermoplastic stitching thread and three dimensional
`shaping during molding [3]. Multiaxis 3D woven preforms and their composites exhibit
`improved in-plane properties due to off-axis fiber positioning [16, 17].
`
`In this chapter, 3D fabrics including 3D nonwoven for technical textile applications are
`reviewed in the light of the existing literature. First, the classification of textile fabric structures
`was introduced based on various classification schemes suggested by experts in the field.
`Types of textile fabric structures were explained under two main groups such as 2D and 3D
`fabrics. Various formation techniques including 2D and 3D nonwoven techniques were
`reviewed with regard to manufacturing processes and resulting fabric and composite prop‐
`erties. Applications of technical textiles in various industrial areas were covered with an
`emphasis on the future trends and technologies.
`
`2. Classification of fabrics
`
`Three-dimensional woven preforms are classified based on various parameters such as fiber
`type and formation, fiber orientation and interlacements and micro- and macro-unit cells. One
`of the general classification schemes has been proposed by Ko and Chou [3]. Another classi‐
`fication scheme regarding yarn interlacement and process type was proposed (Table 1) [18].
`In this scheme, 3D woven preforms are subdivided into orthogonal and multiaxis fabrics, and
`their processes have been categorized as traditional or new weaving, and specially designed
`looms. Chen [19] categorized 3D woven preforms made by traditional weaving techniques
`based on their macro-geometry. According to this classification, 3D woven preforms are
`grouped as solid, hollow, shell, and nodal structures with varying architectures and shapes
`(Table 2). Bilisik [20] suggested a more precise classification of 3D woven preforms according
`to their interlacement types (fully interlaced woven/non-interlaced orthogonal), macro
`geometry (cartesian/polar) and reinforcement direction (2-15) (Table 3).
`
`Non-interlacing
`Orthogonally
`Orientating and
`Binding
`
`Type Uniaxial
`
`Type
`Multiaxial
`
`Direct
`Binding
`
`Indirect
`Binding
`
`Direct
`Binding
`
`Indirect
`Binding
`
`Modified 2D Weaving Machine
`
`Thick Panel [21]
`
`Specially Designed Machine
`
`Profiled Bar/Beam [22]
`
`Modified 2D Weaving Machine
`
`Profiled Bar/Beam [23]
`
`Specially Designed Machines
`
`Profiled Bar/Beam [24-26]
`
`Thick Tubular [27]
`
`Specially Designed Machine
`
`Thick-Walled Tubular [28]
`
`Modified Warp Knitting Machine
`
`Thin Panel [29]
`
`Specially Designed Machines
`
`Thick Panel [30, 31]
`
`Thin Panel [32]
`
`Table 1. Three-dimensional woven fabric classification based on non-interlace structuring [18].
`
`000004
`
`

`

`84
`
`Non-woven Fabrics
`
`Structure
`
`Solid
`
`Hollow
`
`Shell
`
`Nodal
`
`Architecture
`Multilayer; Orthogonal; Angle
`interlock
`
`Multilayer
`
`Single layer; Multilayer
`Multilayer; Orthogonal; Angle
`interlock
`
`Shape
`
`Compound structure with regular or tapered geometry
`
`Uneven surfaces, even surfaces, and tunnels on different
`levels in multi-directions
`Spherical shells and open box shells
`
`Tubular nodes and solid nodes
`
`Table 2. Three-dimensional woven fabric classification based on macro-structure [19].
`
`Direction
`
`2 or 3
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6 to 15
`
`Cartesian
`Angle interlock;
`Layer-to-layer;
`Through the thickness
`Core structure
`
`Plain and Plain laid-in
`
`Twill and Twill laid-in
`
`Satin and Satin laid-in
`
`Plain and Plain laid-in
`
`Twill and Twill laid-in
`
`Satin and Satin laid-in
`
`Plain and Plain laid-in
`
`Twill and Twill laid-in
`
`Satin and Satin laid-in
`
`Rectangular array
`Hexagonal array
`
`Woven
`Polar
`
`Tubular
`
`Three dimensional weaving
`
`Cartesian
`
`Orthogonal nonwoven
`Polar
`
`Weft-insertion
`
`Weft-winding and
`sewing
`
`Plain and Plain
`laid-in
`Twill and Twill
`laid-in
`Satin and Satin
`laid-in
`Plain and Plain
`laid-in
`Twill and Twill
`laid-in
`Satin and Satin
`laid-in
`Plain and Plain
`laid-in
`Twill and Twill
`laid-in
`Satin and Satin
`laid-in
`Rectangular array
`Hexagonal array
`
`Open-lattice
`Solid
`
`Tubular
`
`Corner across
`Face across
`
`Tubular
`
`Solid
`
`Tubular
`
`Rectangular array
`Hexagonal array
`
`Rectangular array
`Hexagonal array
`
`Table 3. The classification of three-dimensional weaving based on interlacement and fiber axis [20].
`
`Three-dimensional braided preforms are classified based on various parameters, including
`manufacturing technique, fiber type and orientation, interlacement patterns, micro-meso unit
`
`000005
`
`

`

`3D Fabrics for Technical Textile Applications
`http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/61224
`
`85
`
`cells and macro-geometry [10, 33]. Kamiya et al. [2] considered manufacturing techniques i.e.,
`solid, 2-step, 4-step and multistep to classify 3D braided preforms. Grishanovi et al. [34] used
`a topological approach based on knot theory to describe and group braided structures whereby
`the braided fabric is considered as a multiknot structure. Bilisik [35] classified 3D braided
`structures as 3D braid, 3D axial braid, and multiaxis 3D braid, as shown in Table 4. These three
`categories were further divided according to their fiber directions (2-6) and geometry (carte‐
`sian/polar).
`
`Number of
`Yarn Sets
`
`3D Braid
`Cartesian
`
`Polar
`
`Three Dimensional Braiding
`3D Axial Braid
`Cartesian
`Polar
`
`Square
`
`Rectangular
`(Out-of-plane at
`an angle)
`1×1 pattern
`3×1 pattern
`
`Tubular
`(Out-of-plane at
`an angle)
`1×1 pattern
`3×1 pattern
`
`Triaxial fabric
`(In-plane)
`Rectangular
`(Out-of-plane at
`an angle)
`1×1pattern
`3×1 pattern
`
`Triaxial fabric
`(In-plane)
`Tubular
`(Out-of-plane at
`an angle)
`1×1 pattern
`3×1 pattern
`
`1 or 2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5 or 6
`
`Multiaxis 3D Braid
`Cartesian
`Polar
`Rectangular
`Tubular
`(Out-of-plane at
`(Out-of-plane at
`an angle)
`an angle)
`
`Rectangular
`
`Tubular
`
`(Out-of-plane
`at an angle)
`
`(Out-of-plane at
`an angle)
`
`Rectangular
`(Out-of-plane
`at an angle)
`Rectangular
`(Out-of-plane
`at an angle)
`
`Tubular
`(Out-of-plane at
`an angle)
`Tubular
`(Out-of-plane at
`an angle)
`
`Table 4. The classification of 3D braiding based on interlacement and fiber axis [35].
`
`Hamada et al. [36] classified 3D knitted structures based on engineering applications, as shown
`in Table 5. Type I fabrics are simple 2-D flat knitted fabrics. These fabrics can be cut to the
`required dimensions and laminated just as woven fabric composites. Two dimensional knitted
`fabrics with 3D shapes are categorized as Type II fabrics. Type III fabrics are multiaxial warp
`knitted fabrics. Type IV fabrics are called sandwich fabrics or 3D hollow fabrics. Type IV fabrics
`are sometimes called “2.5 D fabrics” and are very effective for the production of high damage-
`tolerant composites [37].
`
`000006
`
`

`

`86
`
`Non-woven Fabrics
`
`Type
`I
`
`II
`
`III
`
`IV
`
`Fabric classification
`2D fabric
`
`2D fabric base 3D
`shape
`3D solid fabric
`
`3D hollow fabric/sandwiched
`fabric
`
`Weft knitted fabric
`Plain, Milano rib, inlaid
`fabrics
`Plain, rib
`
`Warp knitted fabric
`Dembigh, Atlas
`
`Dembigh, Atlas
`
`Plain and rib fabrics with
`inlay fiber yarns
`Single jersey face structure
`
`Multiaxial warp knitted
`fabrics
`Single Dembigh face
`structure
`
`Table 5. Classification of typical warp and weft knitted fabrics [36].
`
`Two- and three-dimensional nonwoven preforms are classified depending upon web bonding
`techniques, web structure, and fiber orientation (Table 6). The nonwoven structure is com‐
`posed of short fibers that are held together by employing various techniques. The extent of
`fiber-fiber bonding is dependent upon fiber geometry, fiber tenacity and flexural rigidity, fiber
`location within the web, the areal mass of the web, etc. Mechanical, chemical or thermal
`methods can be utilized to achieve fiber-fiber bonding and thus create a continuous nonwoven
`web. Mechanical methods aim to commingle the fibers by an applied force (i.e., needling or
`water-jet) so that fiber-fiber entanglements occur in the web holding the structure together. In
`the chemical method, fiber surfaces are bonded together by using suitable binding agents, or
`the bonding is achieved by dissolving the fiber surfaces with a solvent followed by merging
`and solidification. Thermal bonding is generally used for thermoplastic fibers and powders.
`Fibers are melted by heat exposure, merged together, and solidified again by cooling [38]. Two-
`and three-dimensional nonwoven nano-web fabricated via electrospinning is a new develop‐
`ment to make nanofiber-based nonwoven fabrics [39].
`
`Nonwoven
`fabric
`
`2D fabric
`3D fabric
`
`Web formation
`
`Formation techniques
`
`Web structure Fiber orientation in web
`
`Needling
`
`Mechanical
`
`Looping
`
`Entangling
`
`Plugs
`
`Loops
`
`Balls
`
`In plane and out-of-plane
`fiber orientation
`
`Short fiber in plane and
`continuous fiber in the out-
`of-plane orientation
`
`In plane fiber placement
`and entanglement
`
`Thermal
`
`Chemical
`
`Hot air; Calendaring; Welding
`
`Impregnation; Spraying; Printing;
`Foaming
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`000007
`
`

`

`3D Fabrics for Technical Textile Applications
`http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/61224
`
`87
`
`Nonwoven
`fabric
`
`Web formation
`
`Formation techniques
`
`Web structure Fiber orientation in web
`
`Electric field
`
`Nanofiber entanglement under
`electric energy
`
`nanofiber
`
`In plane continuous nano
`fiber placement and
`entanglement
`
`Table 6. Classification of nonwoven fabrics [38].
`
`3. Types of fabrics
`
`3.1. Two-dimensional fabrics
`
`3.1.1. Woven fabric
`The 2D woven fabric is the most widely used material in the composite industry. It contains
`two yarn sets i.e., warp (0˚) and weft (90˚), that lie perpendicular to each other in the fabric
`plane. Warp and weft yarns make a series of interlacements with one another according to a
`weave type and pattern to make the woven fabric. Basic weave types produced by traditional
`weaving are plain, twill and satin. Different fabric structures can be constructed from a weave
`type by changing the weave pattern. There are also derivative weave types that are created to
`obtain desired combinations of fabric properties. Some of the weave types are shown in Figure
`1 [40]. In plain weave, each warp yarn passes alternately under and over each weft yarn. Hence,
`it is symmetrical and has a good dimensional stability. However, plain woven fabric has high
`crimp and is difficult to form during molding due to high number of interlacements for a given
`area. In twill weave, a warp yarn passes over and under two or more weft yarns based on a
`diagonal pattern. The twill woven fabric has a smoother surface in comparison with plain
`weave, simply because of multiple jumps between interlacements. It has also lower crimp. In
`addition, it has a good wettability and drapability. However, it shows less dimensional stability
`compared to the plain weave. In satin weave, warp yarns alternately weave over and under
`two or more weft yarns to make fewer intersections. Therefore, it has a smooth surface, good
`wettability and a high degree of drapability. It has also low crimp. However, it has low stability
`and an asymmetrical structure. Another 2D woven architecture is leno weave in which adjacent
`warp yarn is twisted around consecutive weft yarn. One of the derivatives of the leno weave
`is mock leno in which occasional warp deviate from the alternate under-over interlacing and
`interlaces every two or more weft. This results in a thick and rough surface with high porosity
`[41-43].
`Two dimensional woven fabric composites show poor impact resistance as a consequence of
`fabric crimp. They also have low in-plane shear properties due to absence of off-axis fiber
`orientation other than material principle directions [4]. Another major problem of these
`composites is that they experience delamination under load due to lack of through-the-
`thickness binder yarns (z-yarns). Through-the-thickness reinforcement eliminates the delami‐
`nation problem, but it reduces the in-plane properties [1, 2]. Biaxial noncrimped fabric was
`
`000008
`
`

`

`88
`
`Non-woven Fabrics
`
`Figure 1. Two dimensional various woven fabrics (a) uniform plain (b) twill (2/2) (c) satin (4/1) (d) leno (1/1), and (e)
`non-interlace woven fabric with stitching (f) non-interlace woven fabric without stitching yarn [41-43].
`
`developed to replace the unidirectional cross-ply laminate [42]. This fabric has warp (0˚
`direction) and filling yarns (90˚ direction) as separate layers so that there is no interlacement
`between them, unlike traditional woven fabrics. Warp and weft layers are linked at intersection
`points by two sets of stitching yarns, one in 0˚ direction and another in 90˚ direction, as shown
`in Figure 1. Biaxial noncrimped fabrics largely eliminate the crimp and delamination problems
`of 2D woven composites.
`
`3.1.2. Triaxial woven fabric
`Triaxial weave structure consists of three yarn sets such as +bias (+warp), -bias (-warp), and
`filling [44]. These yarn sets make interlacements as in traditional biaxial fabric (Figure 2).
`The fabric generally has large hexagonal openings between interlacements. Open-reed
`process used in the fabrication of this type of fabric does not allow making fabrics as dense
`as a traditional woven fabric. Triaxial fabrics have two variants, namely, loose-weave and
`tight-weave. It was shown that loose-weave fabric has certain stability and higher shear
`stiffness in ±45˚ directions when compared to the biaxial fabrics as well as having a more
`isotropic structure. Quart-axial fabric has four sets of yarns such as +bias, -bias, warp and
`filling as shown in Figure 2. All yarns are interlaced to each other to form the fabric structure
`[45]. Warp yarns are inserted to the fabric at selected places to increase directional strength
`and stiffness properties. Therefore the fabric structure can be tailored to fulfill various end-
`use requirements.
`
`Figure 2. Triaxial woven fabrics (a) loose fabric (b) tight fabric (c) one variant of triaxial woven fabric, and (d) quart-
`axial woven fabric [44, 45].
`
`3.1.3. Braided fabric
`Two-dimensional braided fabrics are extensively used in industrial textiles and composites. It
`has one yarn set, braiders oriented in +θ and –θ directions. In order to produce the fabric
`
`000009
`
`

`

`3D Fabrics for Technical Textile Applications
`http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/61224
`
`89
`
`surface shown in Figure 3, braiders are intertwined with each other. Basic braid patterns that
`can be produced by traditional methods are diamond, regular and hercules braid [46]. The 2D
`braided fabric reinforced composite fabrication is similar to that of 2D woven composites.
`Multiple braided fabrics can be stacked one on top of another to produce reinforced compo‐
`sites. These composites suffer from yarn crimp and lack through-the-thickness reinforcement
`(z-yarns) and thus experience delamination leading to a poor impact behavior [4]. In order to
`overcome the delamination and related problems, 2D fabric layers can be stitched together in
`the thickness direction to impart out of plane fiber reinforcement. Stitching was shown to
`substantially decrease delamination but it can lead to a reduction in in-plane properties due
`to the holes created by stitching needle which act as stress concentration points.
`
`Figure 3. (a) Two-dimensional traditional biaxial braided fabric, and (b) triaxial braided fabric [47].
`
`3.1.4. Triaxial braided fabric
`
`Triaxial braided fabric has basically three sets of yarns: +braid (+bias), -braid (-bias), and warp
`(axial). Axial yarns lie across the fabric whereas braided yarns intertwine with each other
`around the axial yarns making about 45˚ angle (Figure 3). The intertwining is similar to that
`of a traditional braided fabric. –Braided yarns cross under and over the +braided yarns
`according to a pattern and this process is repeated throughout the fabric structure. Triaxial
`braided fabric generally has large openings between the axial yarns, intertwining regions.
`Although dense fabrics can be produced, the process is not suitable for the fabrication of fabrics
`as dense as a traditional biaxial braided fabric. It was shown that the mechanical properties of
`triaxial fabric are significantly higher than biaxial braided fabrics, especially in the direction
`of axial yarns [47]. This shows that the incorporation of axial yarns strongly enhances the
`directional properties of the fabric.
`
`3.1.5. Knitted fabric
`
`Knitted fabric is composed of yarn loops connected to each other and to the neighboring rows
`and columns by various techniques. This process is also called “interloping.” The basic knitting
`
`000010
`
`

`

`90
`
`Non-woven Fabrics
`
`types are weft knitting and warp knitting. In weft knitting, a continuous yarn forms one
`horizontal row of loops called a “course” connecting it to the previously formed courses in the
`process (Figure 4). The vertical columns of loops are called “wale.” In warp knitting, yarn loops
`are connected vertically to form the fabric structure. Knitted fabrics are characterized by their
`‘wale density’ and ‘course density.’ The wale density is defined as the number of wales per
`unit length in the course direction. The course density is defined as the number of courses per
`unit length in the wale direction. Stitch density is the product of course density and wale
`density [36, 48].
`
`Figure 4. (a) Two-dimensional weft knitted fabric (b) warp knitted fabric, and (c) spiral knitted fabric [36].
`
`3.1.6. Uniaxial knitted fabric
`
`The special looped structure of knitted fabrics results in large gaps in the fabric structure. This
`reduces the overall fiber volume fraction of the composite leading to low mechanical proper‐
`ties. Furthermore, the fabric is loosely formed unlike a woven fabric, which leads to high
`elongation and low stiffness. These problems have led to structural modifications of knitted
`fabrics by using inlay yarns either in fabric length or width direction to increase the mechanical
`properties of the resulting composites. Figure 5 presents the schematic views of these modifi‐
`cations. The inlay yarns are trapped inside the knitted loops during the fabric formation. It
`was shown that the tensile strength of uniaxial knitted fabric composites can be improved
`significantly in the inlaid directions [49].
`
`Figure 5. (a) Two-dimensional warp in-laid weft knitted fabric (b) 2D weft in-laid weft knitted fabric (c) 2D warp in-
`laid warp knitted fabric (d) 2D weft in-laid warp knitted fabric, and (e) 2D weft in-laid spiral knitted fabric [49].
`
`000011
`
`

`

`3D Fabrics for Technical Textile Applications
`http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/61224
`
`91
`
`3.1.7. Biaxial knitted fabric
`
`Biaxial knitted structures were developed by the insertion of warp (0°), weft (90°) or diagonal
`(±45°) yarns to the weft or warp knitted fabrics, as shown in Figure 6. The in-laid yarns improve
`the directional mechanical properties of the resulting composites.
`
`Figure 6. (a) Two-dimensional weft in-laid 0°/90° knitted fabric and schematic view (b) warp in-laid 0°/90° knitted fab‐
`ric, and (c) warp in-laid ±45° knitted fabric [50-52].
`
`3.1.8. Nonwoven fabric
`
`Nonwoven fabric is a web structure made up of short fibers that are held together by various
`techniques. These techniques include needling, knitting, stitching, thermal bonding, chemical
`bonding, and electrospinning. Needling is a method where vertically positioned barbed
`needles or water jets strike into the fiber web so as to entangle the fibers and create a mechanical
`locking between them. Knitting aims to entrap the fibers and fix them in position with the aid
`of knitting loops. In stitching technique, the fiber web is stitched in through-the-thickness
`direction. Thermal bonding is generally applied to thermoplastic fibers and powders. Fiber
`web is subjected to heat treatment which softens and unifies the neighboring fiber surfaces.
`This process is followed by cooling that solidifies the fibers and gives the web its final form.
`In the chemical process, polymer dispersions are used as binders to consolidate the nonwoven
`fabric. In electrospinning method, polymer solution is drawn under high electric energy field
`by using needles. Various fibers can be used to make nonwoven nano fibers such as polyur‐
`ethane, polyvinyl alcohol and carbon. The nonwoven produced from these fibers can provide
`interesting physical and electrical properties with their high surface area. Nanofibers with
`diameters in the range of 40-2000 nm (0.04-2 μm) can be made. Fiber diameters can be varied
`and controlled [53-55]. Figure 7 shows the schematic and real views of 2D nonwoven fabrics
`manufactured by various methods [56, 57].
`
`Figure 7. Schematic view of 2D nonwoven fabric by (a) mechanical needling (b) hydroentanglement (c) schematic view
`of stitched nonwoven structure (d) knitting loop surface, and (e) knitting loop reverse surface [58].
`
`000012
`
`

`

`92
`
`Non-woven Fabrics
`
`3.2. Three-dimensional fabrics
`
`3.2.1. Non-interlaced fabric structures
`Non-interlaced fabrics consist of multiple fiber layers that are stacked one on top of another.
`There is no interlacement between these layers so the fibers lie across the structure without
`crimping. This is an obvious advantage for in-plane properties since the fibers are well oriented
`in in-plane directions. Out-of-plane properties, however, are poor due to lack of through-the-
`thickness fibers (z-fibers). If the fabric has one set of yarn oriented in 0˚ direction it is referred
`to as uniaxial non-interlaced fabric preform. Biaxial non-interlaced fabric preform consists of
`two fiber sets oriented at 0/90˚. A multiaxis non-interlaced fabric preform has four fiber sets
`oriented in 0/90/±45˚ directions (Figure 8) [43].
`
`Figure 8. (a) Unidirectional non-interlaced fabric schematic and fabric (b) biaxial non-interlaced fabric schematic and
`fabric, and (c) multiaxis non-interlaced fabric schematic and fabric [43].
`
`3.2.2. Multistitched fabric structures
`A multistitched fabric preform is produced by stitching 2D fabric layers in thickness
`direction. Stitching can be applied (i) only in 0° direction, (ii) 0° and 90° directions, and (iii)
`0°, 90° and ±bias directions as shown in Figure 9. Lockstitch is commonly used for pre‐
`form production. Stitching can be done manually or with the aid of a stitching machine.
`Stitching can be applied to all fabric types such as woven fabrics, braided fabrics, knitted
`fabrics, or nonwoven fabrics [59].
`
`Figure 9. Schematic views of multistitched 2D woven fabric. Stitching directions (a) one direction (b) two direction (c)
`four direction; cross-sectional view of four directionally machine and hand stitched structures on (d) 0°, (e) 90°, (f) +45°,
`and -45° [59].
`
`3.2.3. Fully interlaced woven fabric structure
`The 3D flat fully interlaced woven fabric structure consists of three yarn sets such as warp,
`weft and z-yarn. The weaving process takes place in in-plane and out-of-plane directions
`according to respective weave patterns. Warp yarns are interlaced with weft yarns at each
`
`000013
`
`

`

`3D Fabrics for Technical Textile Applications
`http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/61224
`
`93
`
`layer according to the weave pattern in in-plane principal directions, whereas z-yarns are
`interlaced with warp yarns at each layer according to the weave pattern in out-of-plane
`principal directions. Three dimensional fully plain, 3D fully twill and 3D fully satin preform
`structures are shown in Figure 10. If the warp and weft yarn sets are interlaced based on any
`weave pattern but the z-yarns are not interlaced and only laid-in orthogonally between each
`warp layers, these 3D woven structures are called semi-interlaced woven structures.
`
`The 3D circular fully interlaced woven fabric structure is composed of three yarn sets such as
`axial (warp), circumferential (weft) and radial (z-yarn) yarns. Here, radial yarns are similar to
`z-yarns in flat woven fabrics. Circumferential yarns are interlaced with axial yarns at each
`circular layer according to the weave pattern in circumferential direction, whereas radial yarns
`are interlaced with axial yarns at each layer according to the weave pattern in radial directions.
`Figure 11 shows the 3D fully plain, 3D fully twill and 3D fully satin circular woven preform
`structures [60, 61].
`
`Figure 10. Three-dimensional fully-interlaced woven preform structures. General view of the five-layer computer-aid‐
`ed drawing of (a) 3D plain (b) 3D twill, and (c) 3D satin woven preform structures [60].
`
`Figure 11. Three-dimensional fully-interlaced circular woven preform structures. General view of the five-layer com‐
`puter-aided drawing of (a) 3D plain (b) 3D twill, and (c) 3D satin circular woven preform structures [61].
`
`3.2.4. Orthogonal woven fabric
`
`In orthogonal woven fabric, warp, filling, and z-yarn sets constitute the fabric. They are
`interlaced to one another and oriented in three orthogonal directions to form the fabric [60].
`The schematic and real views of fabric unit cell are shown in Figure 12 [60, 62]. Warp yarns
`are placed in the fabric length direction whereas filling yarns are inserted between the warp
`
`000014
`
`

`

`94
`
`Non-woven Fabrics
`
`layers to form double picks. Z-yarns lock the other two yarn sets and provide structural
`integrity.
`
`Figure 12. (a) Schematic view of 3D orthogonal woven unit cell (b) 3D woven carbon fabric preform [60, 62].
`
`The 3D angle interlock is another type of 3D woven fabric that is produced by 3D weaving
`loom [63]. The fabric has a total of four yarn sets namely filling yarns, +bias yarns, -bias yarn,
`and stuffer (warp) yarns. Bias yarns are oriented in the thickness direction. There are two types
`of this fabric structure such as layer-to-layer and through-the-thickness as shown in Figure
`13. In layer-to-layer fabric, bias yarns travel between two successive fabric layers making
`interlacements with several filling yarns according to the weave pattern. In through-the-
`thickness fabric, on the other hand, bias yarns take a straight path along the f

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket