Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 42
`Entered: January 4, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`WILLIS ELECTRIC COMPANY, LIMITED,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`POLYGROUP MACAU LTD (BVI),
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`IPR2017-00309 (Patent 8,863,416 B2)
`IPR2017-003311 (Patent 9,119,495 B2)
`IPR2017-003342 (Patent 8,959,810 B2)
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before WILLIAM V. SAINDON, JEREMY M. PLENZLER, and
`BARBARA A. PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`PLENZLER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 IPR2017-00332 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`2 IPR2017-00335 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 42
`Entered: January 4, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`WILLIS ELECTRIC COMPANY, LIMITED,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`POLYGROUP MACAU LTD (BVI),
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`IPR2017-00309 (Patent 8,863,416 B2)
`IPR2017-003311 (Patent 9,119,495 B2)
`IPR2017-003342 (Patent 8,959,810 B2)
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before WILLIAM V. SAINDON, JEREMY M. PLENZLER, and
`BARBARA A. PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`PLENZLER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 IPR2017-00332 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`2 IPR2017-00335 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00309 (Patent 8,863,416 B2)
`IPR2017-00331 (Patent 9,119,495 B2)
`IPR2017-00334 (Patent 8,959,810 B2)
`
`
`The parties have requested an oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.70. Paper 41 (Patent Owner’s Request); Paper 42 (Petitioner’s
`Request).3 The request for an oral hearing is granted. The oral hearing will
`commence following the hearing in IPR2016-01781 after a brief
`intermission. The hearing in IPR2016-01781 is scheduled to begin at 1:00
`PM Eastern Time on February 5, 2018, on the ninth floor of Madison
`Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. That hearing will
`include a total of one hour of argument time (thirty minutes per side). A
`trial hearing order is issued concurrently in that proceeding.
`The oral hearing will be held jointly and simultaneously for each of
`the above-identified IPRs. The panel encourages the parties not to use the
`oral argument time to provide an overview of their case. Instead, the panel
`encourages each party, after some initial remarks, to focus on specific issues
`it would like to highlight or clarify, starting with those the party deems most
`important to discuss with the Board. It is the panel’s experience that long
`slide decks sequentially stepping through each issue in the case is not the
`most effective use of the hearing. The panel will make its decision based on
`the written briefs; oral hearing is the parties’ opportunity to clarify the
`panel’s understanding of the evidence and the parties’ positions in the briefs.
`Each side will have sixty minutes to present arguments. Petitioner
`bears the ultimate burden of proof that the claims at issue in this review are
`unpatentable. Petitioner will, therefore, begin by presenting its case
`regarding the challenged claims and grounds for which the Board instituted
`
`
`3 Citations are to papers in IPR2017-00309. IPR2017-00331 and IPR2017-
`00334 have similar papers.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00309 (Patent 8,863,416 B2)
`IPR2017-00331 (Patent 9,119,495 B2)
`IPR2017-00334 (Patent 8,959,810 B2)
`
`trial in the proceeding. Patent Owner will then respond to Petitioner’s
`arguments. Petitioner may reserve time to reply to arguments presented by
`Patent Owner. Patent Owner will not have a sur-reply to address any
`rebuttal from Petitioner.
`The hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance that
`will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. The Board will
`provide a court reporter, and the transcript shall constitute the official record
`of the hearing and be entered in each proceeding.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served at
`least five business days before the hearing. The parties also shall provide a
`courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board by the end of day,
`January 30, 2018, by emailing them to Trials@uspto.gov. The parties shall
`not file any demonstrative exhibits in this proceeding without prior
`authorization from the Board. For guidance on what constitutes an
`appropriate demonstrative exhibit, the parties are directed to Paper 118 in
`CBS Interactive Inc. v. Wireless Sciences LLC, IPR2013-00033 (PTAB
`October 23, 2013). No live testimony from any witness will be taken at the
`oral argument.
`One member of the panel from a PTO regional office will be attending
`the conference via remote video link. Physical exhibits and the projector
`screen will not be viewable to this judge. The parties should prepare
`accordingly; all requests to provide physical exhibits or examples are denied.
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual equipment are to be
`made no later than five days in advance of the hearing date. The request is to
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00309 (Patent 8,863,416 B2)
`IPR2017-00331 (Patent 9,119,495 B2)
`IPR2017-00334 (Patent 8,959,810 B2)
`
`be sent to Trials@uspto.gov, and any requests not sent separately and
`specifically to that email address will not be considered. If the request is not
`received timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the
`hearing.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Larina A. Alton
`LAlton@FoxRothschild.com
`
`Lukas D. Toft
`LToft@FoxRothschild.com
`
`Doug Christensen
`christensen@cfpatlaw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Christopher J. Forstner
`chris.forstner@troutmansanders.com
`
`Alexis N. Simpson
`alexis.simpson@troutmansanders.com
`
`Jason D. Eisenberg
`jasone-ptab@skgf.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
