throbber

`
`
`
`Paper No. ____
`Filed: June 26, 2017
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________________
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ICOS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`_____________________________
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00323
`Patent No. 6,943,166
`
`_____________________________
`
`
`PETITIONER MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.’S
` OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1
`
`II.
`
`OBJECTIONS .............................................................................................. 1
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`Objections to Ex. 2001, and any Reference to/Reliance
`Thereon ..................................................................................... 1
`
`Objections to Ex. 2002, and any Reference to/Reliance
`Thereon ..................................................................................... 2
`
`iii. Objections to Ex. 2003, and any Reference to/Reliance
`Thereon ..................................................................................... 2
`
`iv. Objections to Ex. 2005, and any Reference to/Reliance
`Thereon ..................................................................................... 3
`
`v.
`
`Objections to Ex. 2006, and any Reference to/Reliance
`Thereon ..................................................................................... 3
`
`vi. Objections to Ex. 2007, and any Reference to/Reliance
`Thereon ..................................................................................... 4
`
`III. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................ 4
`
`
`
`-i-
`
`

`

`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`(“Petitioner”) submits the following objections to ICOS Corporation’s (“Patent
`
`Owner”) Exhibits 2001-2003 and 2005-2007, as listed on the List of Exhibits filed
`
`by Patent Owner with the Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response (“Preliminary
`
`Response”) on March 13, 2017, and any reference to or reliance on the foregoing
`
`Exhibits in the Preliminary Response or future filings by Patent Owner. As
`
`required by 37 C.F.R. § 42.62, Petitioner’s objections below apply the Federal
`
`Rules of Evidence (“F.R.E.”).
`
`II. OBJECTIONS
`
`i. Objections to Ex. 2001, and any Reference to/Reliance Thereon
`
`Grounds for Objection: F.R.E. 602 (Foundation); F.R.E. 801, 802, 803, 805
`
`(Inadmissible Hearsay); F.R.E. 901 (Authenticating Evidence).
`
`Patent Owner describes Ex. 2001 as “Eli Lilly & Co., Heritage” printed from
`
`the website www.lilly.com. Ex. 2001 contains no print date. Neither the Patent
`
`Owner nor the exhibit provides adequate foundation for the document itself or its
`
`authenticity. F.R.E. 602, 901. Further, the document itself appears to be
`
`inadmissible hearsay. F.R.E. 801, 802, 803. To the extent that Patent Owner relies
`
`on any statements in this exhibit for the truth of the matter asserted, such
`
`-1-
`
`

`

`
`
`statements are inadmissible hearsay when relied upon by Patent Owner. F.R.E.
`
`801, 802, 803, 805.
`
`ii. Objections to Ex. 2002, and any Reference to/Reliance Thereon
`
`Grounds for Objection: F.R.E. 602 (Foundation); F.R.E. 801, 802, 803, 805
`
`(Inadmissible Hearsay); F.R.E. 901 (Authenticating Evidence).
`
`Patent Owner describes Ex. 2002 as “Bloomberg: Company Overview of
`
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,” printed from the website Bloomberg.com. Neither
`
`the Patent Owner nor the exhibit provides adequate foundation for the document
`
`itself or its authenticity. F.R.E. 602, 901. Further, the document itself appears to
`
`be inadmissible hearsay. F.R.E. 801, 802, 803. To the extent that Patent Owner
`
`relies on any statements in this exhibit for the truth of the matter asserted, such
`
`statements are inadmissible hearsay. F.R.E. 801, 802, 803, 805.
`
`iii. Objections to Ex. 2003, and any Reference to/Reliance Thereon
`
`Ground Grounds for Objection: F.R.E. 602 (Foundation); F.R.E. 801, 802,
`
`803, 805 (Inadmissible Hearsay); F.R.E. 901 (Authenticating Evidence).
`
`Patent Owner describes Ex. 2003 as a Mylan N.V. Annual Report (Form
`
`10K) dated February 15, 2016, downloaded from “shareholder.com.” Patent
`
`Owner has failed to establish any foundation for “shareholder.com” as an authentic
`
`source of Mylan N.V. SEC filings, and the document is hundreds of pages long,
`
`making a comparison with the authentic document to confirm its authenticity
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`
`
`unwieldly and burdensome. F.R.E. 602, 901. To the extent that Patent Owner
`
`relies on any unauthenticated statements in Ex. 2003 for the truth of the matter
`
`asserted, such statements are inadmissible hearsay. F.R.E. 801, 802, 803, 805.
`
`iv. Objections to Ex. 2005, and any Reference to/Reliance Thereon
`
`Grounds for Objection: F.R.E. 602 (Foundation); F.R.E. 801, 802, 803, 805
`
`(Inadmissible Hearsay); F.R.E. 901 (Authenticating Evidence).
`
`Patent Owner describes Ex. 2005 as “FDA’s Review Process for New Drug
`
`Applications: A Management Review, Office of Inspector General, OEI-01-01-
`
`00590 (March 2003).” Neither the Patent Owner nor the exhibit provides adequate
`
`foundation for the document itself, its authenticity, or how it was obtained. F.R.E.
`
`602, 901. Further, Exhibit 2005 appears to contain inadmissible hearsay. F.R.E.
`
`801, 802, 803, 805.
`
`v. Objections to Ex. 2006, and any Reference to/Reliance Thereon
`
`Grounds for Objection: F.R.E. 602 (Foundation); F.R.E. 801, 802, 803, 805
`
`(Inadmissible Hearsay); F.R.E. 901 (Authenticating Evidence).
`
`Patent Owner describes Ex. 2006 as “Manual of Policies and Procedure,
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Communications,
`
`Communicating Drug Approval Information, MAPP 4520.1, Rev. 1 (Effective
`
`8/20/14).” Neither the Patent Owner nor the exhibit provides adequate foundation
`
`for the document itself, its authenticity, or how it was obtained. F.R.E. 602, 901.
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`
`
`Further, Exhibit 2006 appears to contain inadmissible hearsay. F.R.E. 801, 802,
`
`803, 805.
`
`vi. Objections to Ex. 2007, and any Reference to/Reliance Thereon
`
`Grounds for Objection: F.R.E. 602 (Foundation); F.R.E. 801, 802, 803, 805
`
`(Inadmissible Hearsay); F.R.E. 901 (Authenticating Evidence).
`
`Patent Owner describes Ex. 2007 as “Manual of Policies and Procedure,
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Training and
`
`Communications, Communicating Drug Approval Information, MAPP 4520.1,
`
`(3/25/98).” Neither the Patent Owner nor the exhibit provides adequate foundation
`
`for the document itself, its authenticity, or how it was obtained. F.R.E. 602, 901.
`
`Further, Exhibit 2007 appears to contain inadmissible hearsay. F.R.E. 801, 802,
`
`803, 805.
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`
`The aforementioned exhibits were filed together with Patent Owner’s
`
`Preliminary Response, prior to institution. Trial was instituted on June 12, 2017.
`
`These objections are made within 10 business days of institution pursuant to 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.64.
`
`Dated: June 26, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Steven W. Parmelee /
` Steven W. Parmelee
` Reg. No. 31,990
`
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`This is to certify that I caused to be served a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s Objections to Evidence, on this
`
`26th day of June, 2017, on the Patent Owner at the correspondence address of the
`
`Patent Owner as follows:
`
`Mark J. Feldstein
`Joshua L. Goldberg
`Yieyie Yang
`Maureen D. Queler
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Email: mark.feldstein@finnegan.com
`Email: joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com
`Email: yieyie.yang@finnegan.com
`Email: maureen.queler@finnegan.com
`Email : ICOS-IPRs@finnegan.com
`
`Mark J. Stewart
`Dan L. Wood
`Gerald P. Keleher
`Eli Lilly and Company
`Lilly Corporate Center
`Indianapolis, IN 46285
`Email: stewart_mark@lilly.com
`Email: wood_dan_l@lilly.com
`Email: keleher_gerald@lilly.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 26, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Steven W. Parmelee /
`Steven W. Parmelee,
`Reg. No. 31,990
`
`
`
`-5-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket