throbber
Phannacopysychiat. 21 (1988) 272-273
`© GeorgThiemeVerlagStuttgart - New York
`
`Long-term Therapy of Affective Disorders: Monotherapy
`or Polypharmacy‘?
`
`W. Kiinig, Fl. Flissom, G. Kalioglu, A. Stein, F. Reimer
`
`Psychiatric Hospitai Weinsberg (Head: Prof. Dr. F. Reimer]. Weinsberg. FRG
`
`Introduction
`
`In the treatment of affective disorders the use of a combined
`
`psychopharmacotherapy is nowadays common among physi-
`cians both in practice as well as in clinics. Analyses of prescrip-
`tions have shown that polypharmacy sometimes is used even
`more often than monotherapy [Grohmarm et al., 1932; Midter-
`Oerfinghausen, I977: Safzmarm. 198i; Schiimler et al., I932).
`Administration of several psychotropic drugs at the same time
`might be useful fora speedieronset of reliefor intensification of
`therapeutic effectiveness at the start oftreatment. In long—term
`treatment. however, polypharmacy might
`lead to unwanted
`effects. such as abuse of benzodiazepines or tardive dyskinesia
`caused by neuroleptics. Besides that it will lead to an increase of
`consumption of psychotropic drugs. The aim of the following
`study was, therefore, to analyse the prescription habits of the
`
`psychiatrists in a large hospital during one decade. especially in
`respect to long—term treatment.
`
`Methods and Pariems
`
`Using the archives of the Psychiatric Hospital Weinsberg, all patients
`hospitalized from 1916 through 1985 diagnosed as “affective disorder“
`according to ICD-Nrs. 296 (3th or 9th revision. respectively) have been
`selected. All patients have been screened based on admission reports.
`clinical course during index treatment. and — as far as possible — on ca-
`tamnesis; patients who did not ciearly meet the criteria of an affective
`disorder have been excluded. Patients selected for the study have been
`divided into three diagnostical subgroups: unipolar. bipolar. and invo-
`lutional depression. Next to sociodemographic data. medication at the
`day of discharge has been recorded. particulariy dosages of antidepres-
`sant drugs and lithium. lndication forthe dosage of lithium was hlood
`level in mmolflz antidepressants have been divided into low dosages
`(up to 15 mg/day of a tricyclic antidepressant or equivalent dosages of
`
`Frequency of affective disorders. percentage of diagnostical subgroups and mean age of female patients at the Psychiatric Hospital
`Table 1
`Weinsberg from 19738-1985
`
`Total (mean age]
`
`Involutional
`depression in "/3
`(mean age}
`Unipolar depression
`in "/3
`(mean age]
`Bipolar depression
`in “/3
`(mean age)
`
`1976
`
`192
`(55.0)
`47.3
`(60.5)
`
`25.8
`(46.5)
`
`26.9
`(53.3)
`
`197?
`
`185
`(55.4)
`48.9
`(61.4)
`
`25.4
`(45.7:
`
`24.7
`(54.1)
`
`19738
`
`186
`(55.5)
`54.9
`(62.6)
`
`24.9
`(42.3)
`
`19119
`
`139
`155.5}
`59.0
`(63.4)
`
`21.4
`(42.9)
`
`19.6
`(51.2)
`
`1980
`
`155
`(55.5)
`51.8
`(63.3)
`
`25.5
`(46.1)
`
`22.?
`(48.2)
`
`1981
`
`171
`(55.8)
`55.4
`(62.9)
`
`26.6
`[4?.0]
`
`18.0
`(50.0)
`
`1982
`
`140
`(58.6)
`57.0
`(67.1)
`
`22.3
`(45.3)
`
`20.?
`(49.6)
`
`1983
`
`153
`(58.3)
`59.4
`(65.0)
`
`21.8
`(43.41
`
`13.3
`154.4}
`
`1984
`
`137
`(60.1)
`61.5
`(616)
`
`21.1
`(49.4)
`
`17.4
`(46.9)
`
`1985
`
`141
`(59.9)
`53.6
`(85.5)
`
`20.0
`(52.4)
`
`25.4
`(54.31
`
`20.2
`(52.7)
`
`Table 2 Prescription oi antidepressant drugs (A0) at the day of discharge; percentage of rnonotherapy and combined therapy with other
`psychotropic drugs (PD).
`
`19?8
`
`157
`
`10.8
`
`51.8
`
`20.4
`
`5.?
`
`1 3
`
`Total number of
`prescriptions
`Monotherapy
`(in %l
`AD + 1 PD
`(in ”/ul
`AD + 2 PD
`(in %l
`AD + 3 PD
`[in "/cl
`AD + 4 PD
`(in 9'9}
`
`1977
`
`151
`
`11.9
`
`55
`
`19?8
`
`162
`
`15.4
`
`54.3
`
`19?9
`
`159
`
`17.6
`
`5?.9
`
`21.4
`
`2.5
`
`0.6
`
`1980
`
`144
`
`1981
`
`132
`
`15.2
`
`58.3
`
`22
`
`4.5
`
`1982
`
`1983
`
`137
`
`10.9
`
`65.?
`
`121
`
`14.9
`
`55.4
`
`26.4
`
`3.3
`
`1985
`
`101
`
`9.9
`
`1984
`
`101
`
`1?.8
`
`58.4
`
`20.8
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 10
`
`1 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1070
`
`

`
`Long-ten'n Therapy of Affective Disorders: Monotherapy or Polyphannacy?
`
`Pharmacopsychiat. 21 { I 988)
`
`273
`
`Table 3 Prescription of lithium [Ll] at the day of discharge; percentage oi monotherapy and combined therapy with other psychotropic
`drugs {PD}
`
`1 976
`
`1 97?
`
`49
`
`6.1
`
`44
`
`5.8
`
`1978
`
`35
`
`2.9
`
`1 979
`
`26
`
`1980
`
`27
`
`1981
`
`25
`
`1982
`
`1 7
`
`1983
`
`27
`
`1985
`
`18
`
`1984
`
`15
`
`6.7
`
`33.3
`
`Total number
`of prescriptions
`Monotherapy
`{in %l
`Ll + 1 PD
`tin %t
`Ll + 2 PD
`(in "/at
`LI + 3 PD
`{in %l
`LI + 4 PD
`{in %l
`
`non-tricyclic antidepressants, respectively), average dosages ('?S—lS[}
`mgfday}, and high dosages (more than 150 mgrdayl. All together 3335
`admission reports have been reviewed. in order to warrant distinction
`of data, results will be presented of female patients only, who represent
`67-75% of all patients.
`
`Results
`
`Table I shows for I976 through 1985 the frequency of female
`patients admitted as well as the percentages of the diagnostic
`subgroups, both with respective mean ages. The proportion of
`patients with involutiortal depression shows, on average, a
`slight increase.
`The total increase of mean age by approximately 5 years was not
`only caused by the higher proportion of patients with involutio-
`nal depression since the mean age of patients with unipolar de-
`pression increased as well.
`At the day of discharge mostly two or three different psychotro-
`pic drugs were administered as maintenance therapy {55—90%
`of all patients}, less than 1% of the patients had five different
`psychotropic drugs, less than l% had none. Table 2 shows the
`relative frequency of combinations of antidepressants with
`other psychotropic drugs. From all patients discharged with an
`antidepressant as main therapeutical strategy, on the average
`only l0—| 5 % were treated in monotherapy. 55-15 % were
`discharged with a combination therapy with one other drug; up
`to 1983 mostly a low potency neuroleptic was added, as of 1984
`a benzodiazepine.
`Approximately 20% of the patients were discharged with three
`different drugs; up to the late seventies primarily with a neuro-
`tropic drug plus a low potency neuroleptic, as of the early
`eighties with a benzodiazepine and a low potency neuroleptic.
`During the decade researched, dosages of antidepressants were
`mostly low (46-58%) or average (40-46 %), high dosages were
`unusual
`(0.8—?.4%}.
`Table 3 shows the frequencies of lithium prescriptions; during
`the whole period there was a continual decrease. Monotherapy
`was rarely used and there was a tendency to administer lithium
`in combination with two other psychotropic drugs, either with
`an antidepressant and a low potency neuroleptic or with a high
`potency and a low potency neuroleptic.
`Lithium blood levels at the day of discharge were relatively con-
`stant throughout the decade, 0.56-0.70 mmolfl (mean 0.66).
`
`Dt'sc'usst'0n
`
`On comparing prescription habits of antidepressants and
`lithium for long-tenn treatment of affective disorders at a large
`psychiatric hospital some remarkable changes were found. The
`dosages of antidepressants and lithium on the day of discharge
`remained nearly the same. Monotherapy was rarely used, the
`number of lithium prescriptions even decreased. On the other
`hand, the percentage of combination therapy clearly increased,
`so that after all the amount of psychotropic drugs administered
`really did increase. Of particular interest is the fact that alt-
`hough general prescriptions of benzodiazepines decreased
`within the last years (Wissenschaftliches Institut der 0t1skran-
`kenkassen. I985), we found a higher rate of benzodiazepine
`prescriptions since I984.
`As we can-ied out a retrospective study, it was of cou rse not pos-
`sible to investigate the patients‘ compliance and whether or not
`the drugs were prescribed further more. Therefore it was impos-
`sible to find out if long term consumption ofpsychotropic drugs
`really increased, but it probably did.
`During the last years consumption of psychotropic drugs has
`been discussed from a more critical point ofview, so that redu-
`cing prescription ofdifferent drugs at the same time might be an
`appropriate contribution to rational psychopharmacotherapy.
`To find out ifthere is a continuing tendency for polyphannacy
`at our hospital will be the subject of further research.
`
`R tgferences
`
`Grohmarm. R .. A. Strauss, Cit. Gehr. E. Rtiirher, H. Ht'ppt'us.'Zur Praxis
`der klinischen Therapie mit Psychopharmaka. Pharmaoopsych-
`iatry 18, Karger Basel 1982.
`Milifl‘er-Oerlinghausen. 3.: Mehrfachrnedikation bei Therapie und
`Prophylaxe
`depressiver Erkranltungen.
`In: H. Helmchen
`(Hrsg.): Depressive
`Syndrome.
`E.
`Banaschewslti-Verlag
`Miinchen 197?.
`Salzmann. C.: Psychotropic dmg use and polypharmacy in a general
`hospital. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 3 {I981} I-9
`Schiissler. G.. M. Linden. 1. (Juan: Patienten in der nerveniirztlichen
`Praxis. Nervenatzt 53 (I932) 537-543.
`PhaI'I'naltolo—
`Wissenschaftliches
`lnstitut der Orstltranltenkassen:
`gisch-therapeutische Analyse der Kasseniirztlichen Arzneiver-
`ordnungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschiand. Bonn 1935.
`
`Dr. W. Kolrtig. P5yt.‘hfatrfsches Landeskrartkenhaus Wet'n.rberg. D-7102 H/efnsberg. FRG
`
`2of2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 10
`
`2 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1070

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket