throbber
SECTION 16.5 I HOOD DISORDERS: PSYCHODYNAMIC ETIOLOGY
`
`U}?
`
`onset of an episode of depression. The most impressive piece
`of evidence linking loss to subsequent depression is the finding
`that loss of a parent before age 11 places adults at a higher than
`usual risk of depression. Some investigators have postulated
`that early childhood losses or separations actually sensitize neu-
`ronal receptor sites in the brain. thereby producing avulncra-'
`bility to mood disorders in adulthood. Persons who grow up
`with that enhanced vulnerability may be highly sensitive to
`images or ideas linked to depressive states. so that an episode
`of depression may be precipitated without requiring a cata-
`strophic external loss. Chronic stress or deprivation of environ-
`mental origin may produce alterations in the catecholarninerg-ic
`syslaem in response to stimulation from the cor1:i.cotropin-releas-
`ing hormone—adrenooorticotropic hormone (ACTI-I) axis. The
`end result of the changes may be the clinical picture of
`depression.
`- The effects of psychosocial influences on neurophysiological
`,factors have been amply derrronstrated in primate research.
`-'Infant squirrel monkeys who are separated from‘ their mothers
`experience long-lasting and. in some cases. permanent neuro-
`biological changes. The changes include lasting alterations in
`the sensitivity of noradrenergic receptors. changes in hypotha-
`larnir: serotonin mretion, and persistently elevated plasma cor-
`tisol levels. The sensitivity and the number of brain opiate
`receptors are also significantly affected by repeated separations.
`Some of the changes are reversible if the inihnt monkeys are
`reunited with their mothers or siblings; other changes are not.
`Moreover. the separations appear to be more or less damaging
`during certain developmental periods. possibly because of the
`correlation with myelirtization in the nervous system.
`In the ensuing discussion .of psychodynarrric factors in the
`etiology of depression. the reader must keep in mind that psy-
`chological influences work in concert with genetic vulnerability
`and neurophysiological alterations to produce the characteristic
`clinical picture of depression. Those characteristics include psy-
`chomotor retardation. sleep changes, loss oi’ appetite, dimin-
`ished sex drive. anhedonia, loss of energy. inappropriate guilt
`feelings. and suicidal ideation. Similarly. comprehensive treat-
`ment plaruiing must take into account both the psychodynamic
`factors and the'alte.rations of neurotransmitters.‘
`One of. the most sophisticated efforts to define die relative
`conuibutions of psychological vulnerability, genetics. and envi-
`rotunental stressors in major depressive disorder was a predic-
`tion study involving female twins. Multiple assessments of 680
`female-female twin pairs of known zygosity were made over
`time, and the findings allowed the investigators to develop an
`etiological model to__predi'c_t major depressive episodes. One of
`die most influential predictors was the presence of recent stress-
`ful events. Genetic factors were also important in prediction of
`depression. Two other factors. neuroticisrn and interpersonal
`relations". also played a substantial etiological role. Neuroticism
`seemed to contribute in part by reducing the level of social
`support for an individual. Interpersonal dimensions of social
`support.
`recent difficulties. and parental wai-md-r_ all were
`involved in predicting a major depressive episode.
`'
`
`FSYCHODYNAMIC THEOHIES OF DEPRESSION
`
`loss in light of the fact that the fantasied loss may be entirely
`unconscious.
`-
`.
`Freud drew an analogy between serious melancholic states
`and normal grief. Both may be time-limited. but Freud cited
`two principal differences. In cases of grief] there is an actual
`object loss in external reality; in depression the lost object is
`more likely to be errtoriortal than real. The second difference is
`that persons with depression experience profound loss of self-
`esteem. but the self-regard of persons engaged in a mourning
`process is not diminished.
`
`The observational differences between-grief and depression
`were pivotal in Freud's theory. He reasoned that one way of
`dealing with the loss of a beloved person is to become like the
`person. Freud defined that process as irttrojectiorr, a defense
`mechanism central
`to the psychodynamics of depression.
`in
`which the patient irrternalizes the lost object so that it becomes
`an intemal presence. Freud later noted that introjection is the
`only way that the ego can give up a valued and loved object.
`Because depressed persons perceive the departed love object
`as having abandoned them, feelings of hatred and anger are
`intemiingled with feelings of love. Freud suggested that ambiv-
`alence of that nature, involving the coexistence of love and hate,
`is instrumental in the psychodynamics of depression. As a result
`of inltrojecting the lost object, the negative part of the depressed
`patient's arnbivalence—-the hatred and artger—is directed
`inward and results in the pathognornonic picture of self-
`reproach. In that manner a suicidal act may have the uncon-
`scious meaning of murder.
`-
`_
`_
`Karl Abraham. one of Freud's early colleagues. shared
`Freud’s view of depression but also extended and elaborated it
`further. Abraham viewed the process of introjection as a
`defense mechanism that takes two forms. First. he thought that
`the introjection of the original love object is the basis for build-
`ing one‘s ego-ideal. so that the role of the conscience is even-
`tually taken over by the lntrojected object. In that conceptual-
`ization much of pathological self-criticism is seen as emanating
`from the introjected love object. In the.second form of intro-
`jection, more in keeping with Freud's idea. the content of self-
`reproach is merciless criticism directed at the object. In other
`words. Abraham viewed the two processes of introjection as
`instrumental . in the creation of the superego. Abraham also
`linked depression to early fixations at the anal and the oral levels
`of psychosexual development, He viewed oral sadistic tenden-
`cies as the primary source of self-punishment in depressed
`patients. and he inferred that inadequate mothering during the
`oral stage of development was involved.
`The psychodynamic understanding of depression defined by
`Freud and expanded by Abraham is known as the classical view
`of depression. That theory involves four key points: (1) Distur-
`bances in die infant-mother relationship during the oral phase
`(the lirst 12 to 18 months of life) predispose to subsequent vul-
`nerability to depression. (2) Depression can be linked to real or
`imagined object loss. (3) Inn-ojection of the departed object is
`a defense mechanism invoked to deal with the distress con-
`nected with the object
`loss.
`(4) Because the lost object
`is
`regarded with a mixture of love and hate, feelings of anger are
`directed inward at the self.
`
`Anger turned inward A common finding in depressed
`patients is profound self-depreciation. Sigmund Freud, in his
`classic 191? paper “Mourning and Melancholia." attributed
`that self-reproach to anger turned inward, which he related to
`object loss. The object loss may or may not be real. A fantasied
`loss may be suflicient to trigger a severe depression. Moreover.
`the patient may acmally be unaware of any specific feelings of
`
`Depressive position Although Melanie Klein understood
`depression as involving die expression of aggression toward
`loved ones, much as Freud did. the developmental theory on
`which her view was based is quite different from Freudian the-
`ory. During the first year of life. ‘Klein believed. the infar1t-pro-
`greases -from the paranoid-schizoid position to the depressive
`position. In the first few months of life. according to Klein. lhfi
`
`101 of 173
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1060
`
`

`
`H18
`
`moon olsonosns I
`
`cu-mPrEl=r rs-
`
`infanr projects highly destructive fantasies into its mother and
`then becomes terrified of the mother as a sadistic persectrtor.
`That terrifying “bad" mother is kept separate from the loving.
`nurturing "good" mother through the defense mechanism of
`splitting. In that manner the infant's blissful feeding'e.xperience
`remains uncontaminated and undisturbed -by persecutory fears
`of attack by the “bad" mother. In the course of normal devel-
`opment, according to Klein. the positive and the negative
`images of the mother are integrated into a more ambivalent
`view. In other words. the infant recognizes that the "bed"
`mother it fears and hates is the same mother as the "good"
`mother it loves and adores. The recognition that one can hun
`loved ones is the essence of the depressive position.
`Klein connected clinical depression with an inability to suc-
`cessfully negotiate the depressive position of childhood. She
`regarded depressed persons as fixated or stuck at :1 develop-
`mental level in which they are extraordinarily concerned that
`loved good objects have been destroyed by the greed and
`destructiveness they have directed at them. In the absence of
`those good objects. depressed persons feel persecuted by the
`hated bad objects, In short, Klein's view was that depressed
`patients are longing or pining for the lost love objects while
`being persecuted by bad objects. In that theoretical framework
`the feelings of self-depreciation are linked to the fear that one’s
`good parents have been transformed into violent persecutors as
`a result of one‘s own destructive tendencies. Also. the bad inter-
`nal objects are internalized into the superego. which then makes
`sadistic demands on the patient. Hence, in the Klcinian view,
`the self-reproaches experienced by depressed patients are
`directed against the self and internal
`impulses, rather than
`toward an introjected object, as in Freud ’s view.
`
`Tension between ideals and reality Whereas most psy-
`chodynamic theories of depression incorporate the superego as
`a significant part of the conceptual understanding. Edward Bibr-
`ing viewed depression as tension arising from within the ego
`itself. rather than between the ego and the superego. According
`to Bibring, the ego has three highly invested narcissistic aspi-
`rations—to be good and loving, to be superior or strong. and to
`be loved and worthy. Those ideals are held up as standards of
`conduct. Depression sets in when a person becomes aware of
`the discrepancy between those ideals and reality. Helplessness
`and powerlessness result from the feeling that one cannot mea-
`sure up to such high standards. Any blow to the self—esteem or
`any frustration of the strivings toward those aspirations precip-
`itates depression. Bibring‘s theory, unlike Freud’s and Klein's.
`does not regard aggression as playing a primary role in depres-
`sion. The depressed person may ultimately experience anger
`turned inward. resulting from the awareness of helplessness;
`however, such expressions of aggression are secondary. rather
`than primary. The essence of depression, in Bibring’s view, is
`a primary affective state arising within the ego and is based on
`the tension between what one would like to be and what one
`is.
`
`Ego as victim oi supere-go Edith Jacobson compared the
`state of depression to a situation in which the ego is at powerless.
`helpless child, victimized by the superego, which becomes the
`equivalent of a sadistic and powerful mother who takes delight
`in torturing the child. Like Freud, Jacobson assumed that
`depressed persons have identified with arnbivalently regarded
`lost love objects. The self is experienced as identified with the
`negative aspects of the object. and ultimately the sadistic qual-
`ities of the lost love object are transformed into the cruel super-
`ego. Hence. depressed persons feel that they are at the mercy
`
`of a sadistic internal torrnentor that is unrelenting in its victim-
`ization. Jacobson also noted that the boundary between self and
`object may disappear, resulting in a fusion of the bad self with
`the bad object.
`
`Dominant other Silvano Arieti studied the psychodynarnic
`underpinnings of depression in severely ill patients who were
`unresponsive to roost somatic treatments. He observed a com-
`mon psychological theme in those patients that involved living
`for someone else. rather than for themselves. He referred to the
`person for whom depressed patients live as-the dominant other.
`In most cases the dominant other is the spouse or a parent. but
`Arieti also noted that sometimes a principle, an ideal, or an
`organization serves a similar psychodynarnic function. In such
`cases he referred to the entity as the dominant ideology or the
`dominant goal.
`Depression often sets in when patients realize that the person
`for whom they have been living is never going to respond in a
`manner that will meet their expectations. The goal of their lives
`is regarded as unattainable, and a profound feeling of helpless-
`ness sets in. In Ar-ieti‘s conceptualization of depression. he
`stressed a marked rigidity in the tltinlting of depressed persons.
`so that any alternative to living for the dominant other or the
`dominant ideology is viewed as unacceptable and even unthink-
`able. Depresscd patients feel locked into an inflexible perspec-
`tive on how they should live their lives and how gratification
`or fulfillment can be obtained. Even though they are depressed
`because living for someone or something other than themselves
`has been a failure. they nevertheless feel paralyzed and unable
`to shift their approach to life. If the dominant other will not-
`respond to them in the way they have longed for, they feel that
`life is worthless, and thatrigidity is often involved in a decision
`that suicide is the only alternative.
`'
`'
`
`sycbi-
`CASE EXAMPLE A 19-year-old college student consulted a
`airlst after one semester in school. He told the psychiatrist that e was
`depressed and discouraged with collage and with himself. College was
`not what he had expected. and be b
`not
`rformed up to his expec-
`ta.1'.'iol'Is. He was seriously questioning wlie ‘er he should return forrhe
`second semester, and he had a sense of -hopelessness about changing
`his feelings. Suicidal thoughts had occasionally crossed his mind.
`although he was not planning to act on them. His sleep was disturbed
`by awakonin in the middle of the night and ruminating about wharhe
`should do.
`e felt ajsignificant diminution in his energy level. and he
`easure.
`.
`cpmrnented that things he used to find enjoyable no longer gave.
`P The patient attended a prestigious college on the West Coast. but
`indicated that he had actually wanted to get into Harvard. His
`_l1-.'
`cation to Harvard had resulted in his being placed on the waiting 151:
`but he had not been acce ted. The psychiatrist he consulted cornmertted
`that the college he had c osen to attend was certain!
`it highly regardpgl
`one. The patient responded. "It's not Harvard."
`en the sychialrrst
`asked the patient how he had done academicallydurin the rst seine!)-
`rer, the patient appeared embarrassed and re lied, " only got a 3.25
`grade-point average—one A and three Bs.‘ ‘
`epsychiauist asked'h1rn_
`why he mined embarrassed to reveal such a solid acaderrtic'reoOrd:
`The atient ex.
`lained that he had wanted to make the dean‘s list but
`that
`had f
`en short of it. since the list required a 3.5 grade-POIIQE
`avera
`.
`'
`_
`'
`" ‘
`Thgepsychiatrist asked the
`atient if he hoped to be in a different
`situation after one semester 0 college. The paticnt‘s answer revealed
`that be had an extraordinarily high internal expectation of himself. Ht‘-
`had wanted to be "a star." a_stra' ht-A student at Harvard. HF
`explained that his father-had gone to
`arvard, and he hoped tbaI,'bY
`being a standout there. he would finally achieve the raise and ruc0E'
`nition from his father that he had always longed or but had ne)-1'3!
`received. His father seemed disappointed that his sonhad not lfi.-".571.
`accepted to Harvard, and the patient was convinced that his father will?
`r
`ashamed of his son for not making the dean's list.
`-
`
`EXPLANATION The above case example illustrates the psycho-
`dynamic theories of both Arieti and Bibring. The patient was
`living his life for a dominant other—his father. He tried to P3?‘
`
`102 of 173
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1060
`
`

`
`SECTION 16.5 I MODD DISORDERS: PSYCHDDYNAMIC ETIDLOGY
`
`H19
`
`form beyond his abilities to extract an approving and loving
`response from his father that was never forthcoming. Thar
`longed-for response was rigidly construed as the only thing that
`mattered in life; even though he was succeeding at a highly
`competitive college, his success did not result in his feeling
`good about himself. Moreover. the patient‘s depression can also
`be linked to his awareness of the disparity between his idealized
`expectations of himself and the reality of his situation, as
`described by Bibring. Being a straight-A student at Harvard was
`his own aspiration; the reality was that he was a B+ student at
`a college that did not measure up to Harvard.
`The vignette also reflects two other key elements in the psy-
`chodynamic etiology of depression. First, in accord with the
`psychoanalytic notion of multiple causation, more than one psy-
`chodynarnic theory may be pertinent in understanding an indi-
`vidual patient's depression. Clearly. bodr the dominant other
`and the tension between ideals and realities were significant
`determinants in causing the patient’s depression. Second, the
`precipitating factors that produce depression do not have to be
`catastrophic events involving obvious external disasters. To a
`casual observer the college student had no apparent reason to
`be depressed, since he was performing successfully at a highly
`regarded college. Nonetheless, the inrrnpsychfc meaning of his
`academic performance was such that the patient felt hopeless
`and despairing as a result In assessing the psychodynamic fac-
`tors in depression, clinicians must always attend to idiosyncratic
`personal meanings of events to fully llnderstand the effects they
`have on the patient. Otherwise, clinicians run the risk of
`responding in the same unempathlc manner that often charac-
`terizes the responses of family members. In the absence of
`objective evidence of any disastrous events in the depressed
`person's life, loved ones often react by saying: “You have no
`reason to be depressed. Everything is going so well in your
`life."
`
`Selfnbiecl lailure The ego and the superego do not figure in
`Heinz Kohut‘s conceptualization of depression. Kohur’s theory.
`known as self psychology, rests on die-assumption that the
`developing self has specific needs that must be met by parents
`to give the child a positive sense of self-esteem and self-cohe-
`sion and that similar responses are required from others
`throughout the course of the life cycle. He refened to those
`needs as mirroring. twinship. and idealization. The mirroring
`Eesponses required by the self are equated with the gleam in the
`mother's eye when the child exhibitionistically shows off for
`the rnother. Adrniration. validation, and affirmation are
`responses that are included under the category of mirroring.
`Twinrhip responses refer to the child's need to be like others.
`A small boy who is outside playing with his toy._ lawn mower
`while his father is mowing the lawn is meeting important psy-
`chological needs in asserting his commonality with his father.
`Finally, the need for idenlizarion is an important aspect of the
`'_ development of the self. Children who grow up with parents
`they can respect and idealize develop healthy standards of con-
`' duct and morality.
`--. Kohut referred to those three needs collectively as selfobject
`needs. In other words, the responses demanded from others are
`required by the self, and the needs of the object as a separate
`_ person are not taken into account. The other person serves as
`an object who meets the needs of the self. Selfobject needs
`essentially refer to certain functions that persons ill the envi-
`ronment Ptovide. rather than to those persons themselves.
`E
`' Kohut felt that selfobjecl responses continue to be needed
`5'
`l-ll-toughout life and are as necessary for emotional health as
`- Oxygen is for physical health. Within that conceptual frame-
`
`,
`
`I
`
`work, depression involves the failure of selfobjects in the envi-
`ronment to provide the self of the depressed person with mir-
`roring, twinship, or idcalizing responses necessary for the self
`to feel whole and sustained. The massive loss of self-esteem
`seen in depression is regarded by Kohut and the self psychol-
`ogists as a serious disruption of the self-selfobjcct connection
`or bond.
`
`Depression as affectand compromise formation Among
`contemporary ego psychologists a widely held view is that
`depression is not only a psychiatric disorder or illness. Instead,
`depression is regarded as an affect reflecting conflict and com-
`promise fomiation. Charles Brenner, the principal architect of
`that view. suggested that concern about such childhood calam-
`ities as object loss. loss of love, castration, and punishment are
`associated with two kinds of unpleasure. One form of unplea-
`sure is anxiety, which involves an anticipated calamity or dan-
`ger. The other form of unpleasure, depressive affect, involves
`a calamity that has already happened. That theory of depressive
`affect differs sharply from the classical views of Freud and
`Abraham. Brermct pointed out that depression is not always
`related to object loss or to oral wishes. He also asserted diat
`identification with a lost object is found in some depressed per-
`sons but not in all and that anger turned inward is a result of
`depression, rather than a cause. Depressive affect, in Brenner's
`view, "can be linked to any of the childhood calamities. rather
`than uniquely to object loss. People can experience depressive
`affect because" they feel unloved, because diey feel castrated. or
`because they feel punished in a variety of ways. Depressive
`affect is a normal and universal part of the human condition.
`A critical feature in Brenr1er’s fonnulation is the idea of com-
`promise formation, in which a symptom is viewed as simulta-
`neously expressing an unconscious wish or drive and a defense
`against that wish or drive. A particular compromise formation
`may be more or less successful in eradicating depressive affect
`in the same manner as it may succeed to varying degrees in
`dealing with anxiety. A dog phobia, for example, is a symptom-
`atic compromise formation that succeeds in eliminating anxiety
`as long as dogs are avoided. Similarly, certain forms of com-
`promise formation may eradicate depressive affect while others
`do not.
`
`The central point of Brenner's psychodynamic theory is that
`depressive affect is a universal feature in every pathological
`conflict. whether it is apparent on the surface or buried in the
`depths of the compromise formation. Depressive effect is a uni-
`versal factor in all cases of psychiatric illness. From that stand-
`point, Brenner believed that classifying certain forms of mental
`illness as depression simply because depressive affect is part of
`the conscious symptoms does not make sense. The conscious
`experience of depression provides information about the em-
`cacy and the nature of a patient's defensive maneuvers and
`compromise formations. in Brenner’s view, but it does not
`reveal much about the underlying causes of the patient‘s. illness.
`
`Early cleprlvatlon Several investigators have noted that con-
`sistent, loving. nurturant parental involvement appears to have
`some value in preventing the development of depression. Con-
`versely, separation from parents early in life or the actual loss
`of a parent may predispose one to depression. Edith Zetzel
`observed that adverse experiences in the fonnative years of
`childhood. particularly those involving separation and loss,
`make it difficult for children to tolerate depressive affects with-
`out resorting to primitive defensive operations. If caretakers fail
`to assist children in identifying and tolerating painful feelings
`
`103 of 173
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1060
`
`

`
`I120
`
`Moon oisonoarls r ' CHAPTER 16
`
`that result from an adverse life experience.'the child will grow
`up with inadequate coping mechanisms. That impaired adap-
`tation may contribute to the subsequent development of
`depression.
`'
`-
`Ernpirica-1 research has provided some corroboration for the
`view that early deprivation is relevant to the cause of depres-
`sion. Rene Spitz demonstrated that infants separated from their
`mothers during the second six months of life have overt signs
`of depression.
`In some cases the infants in Spitz‘s studies
`wasted away and died in response to the separations. Margaret
`Mahler and her colleagues. who studied the interactions
`between normal and abnormal mother-infant pairs. found that
`children's emotional dependence on their parents is instrumen-
`tal in the development of their capacity to grieve and mourn.
`That capacity. in turn. influences children's feelings of self-
`esteem and helplessness. Although the development of depres-
`sion may involve genetic and constitutional factors. as well as
`environmental strcssors. most theorists agree that the early rela-
`tionship between child and parent plays a significant role in
`causing depression.
`I
`
`Prornorbid personality factors A cornpreh_ensiv.e psycho-
`dynamic understanding of depression must include premorbid
`personality factors in] d1e.equation. All persons-may ‘become
`depressed. given sufficient environmental stress, but certain
`personality types or traits appear to dispose one to depression.
`For example, the harsh. perfectionistic superego characteristic
`of persons with ob,sessive-compulsive personality disorder may
`lead them to feel that they are always falling short of their own
`excessive expectations of themselves. As noted earlier.
`that
`intrapsychic constellation may be critical in the development of
`atnajor depressive episode. Similarly. Axis I] -personality dis-
`orders involving dependent yeamings for care—sucl1 as depen-
`dent, histrionic, and borderline personality disorders-—may also
`be more vulnerable to depression. Those personality disorders
`that use projection and other externalizing defense mechanisms,
`such as antisocial and paranoid personality disorders. are less
`likely to decornpensate into depress_ion. No panicolar promot-
`bid personality type has been associated with the development
`of bipolar disorder.
`'
`Evidence is accumulating that an Axis I] diagnosis of aper-
`sonality disorder may complicate
`course and treatment of
`depression. Depressed patients with personality disorders gen-
`erally have ‘poorer outcomes in the area of social functioning
`than those without personality disorders. Furthermore. residual
`depressive symptoms are more likely to present in recovering
`depressed patients who have an Axis H diagnosis. Psychoana-
`lytic clinicians have observed that personality factors frequently
`serve to maintain _a depressed state once, it has occurred. In
`clinical practice the complicating factors of a. comorbid person-
`ality disorder diagnosisare quite common. One study found that
`42 percent of persons with major depressive disorder and 51
`percent of patients with dyslhymic disorder have an accompa-
`nying Axis II diagnosis.
`
`CHAFIACTEHOLOGICAL DEPRESSION Many patients
`encountered in clinical practice report feelings of depression
`even though they lack symptoms of a'well-defined Axis 1 dis-
`order. such as major depressive episode. Many of those patients
`have a primarydiagnosis of a personality disorder on Axis II’
`and experience characterological depression, a feeling of per-
`vasive loneliness or ernptiness associated with the perception
`that others are not meeting one‘s emotional needs. They can be
`distinguished from‘ patients with an Axis I diagnosis of major
`depressive episode by the absence of vegetative symptoms
`
`(such as psychomotor retardation. loss of libido. diminished
`appetite, lack ofenergy._and sleep disturbance) and by the pres-
`ence of certain qualitative features of their complaint of depres-
`sion. Loneliness. emptiness. aod boredom areoften chronic
`complaints in characterological depression but are much less
`common in Axis I illnesses. In addition. a conscious sense of
`rage at not having their needs met may be present. The patients
`often describe childhood experiences in which they ‘felt
`deprived of appropriate emotional nurturance front their par-
`ents. As a result. they continue to seek parental substitutes in
`adult life.
`'
`'
`
`Characterological depression is differentiated from Axis II
`personality disorders by the fact that it is an affective state
`occurring within the context of certain personality disorders.
`rather than a constellation of traits forming an overarching per-
`sonality type.
`-
`
`A 29-yearcld woman came tpdpsychotherapy complaining that she
`was "empty“ inside and "need
`to be filled up" by a positive expe-
`rience with a psychotherapist. She said that, while she was‘ growing
`up. her mother never had time for her and that her mother-loved her
`two sisters more than her. The patient -had had a sericsof romantic
`relationships with men. but she never felt that she was getting the kind
`of attention and love that she needed from any of them. The men often
`ended the relationship because they felt that she wastoo demanding
`and that they could not
`sibly meet all her needs. Her last therapist
`had “given up"_ on her
`ause be, too. felt that he was unable .to be
`of help to her. The patient also indicated that she had called, her "re-
`vious therapist almost every night because she would begin to eel
`lonely and need his reassurance that he still cared. She feared that she
`had turned off her therapist by being too dema.nding..She also described
`several ang
`outbursts dire_cted.at him when he would not talk with
`her for long y periods of time on the phone during the evening. She
`wondered if her outbursts made him hate-her.
`The patient had taken four different antidep1essive_medications with
`no iihfivrovetnent She did not meet the diagnostic criteria for an Axis
`I dys ymic disorder or major de ressive
`isode. However. she did
`have cliaracterislics in keeping wt
`two di erent Axis II diagnoses—
`dependent personality disorder and borderline personality disorder. _
`
`OTHER CIJNICAL ENTITIES In addition to the existence of
`characterological depression in the presence of other Axis-l1
`personality disorders. another clinical entity is described by
`psychoanalysts ‘as depressive personality or depressive charac-
`ter. That disorder may be a form of chronic depression closely
`related to the Axis I diagnosis of dysthymic disorder. Persons
`suffering from the disorder exhibit the following symptoms:
`helplessness; chronic feelings of guilt; relationships ‘character-
`ized by dependency; persistent low self-esteem; an inclination
`to be self-punitive, self-denying, and hypercritica]; and a cone
`viction that things are hopeless and will never change. Patients
`with that character structure do not allow themselves to have
`any fonn of gratification in life because of disturbed relation-
`ships in "childhood with parents or parental substitutes. '
`A related form of charactcrological depression has been
`labeled depressive-masochistic personality -disorder by- Otto
`Kemberg. Patients with the disorder are characterized by an
`extrerrlely demanding superego that results in'humorless.-overly
`conscientious. self-critical tendencies. The patients have exces?
`sive needs for approval. love, and acceptance from others, and
`they unconsciously cause others to feel guilty becauseof their
`inability to meet the patient‘s demands. The consequences of
`that pattem of interaction are further feelings of rejection
`because others do not want to be part of a relationship in which
`' they never meet the expectations-of the patient. People with
`depressive-masochistic ‘personalities are also characterologh
`cally prone to turn anger inward to avoid any expression Of
`aggression and anger toward others.
`-
`Clinicians must remember that depression spans the entire
`spectrum of pathology and health. In addition to being a discrelc
`
`104 of 173
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1060
`
`

`
`SECTION 16.5 I MOOD DISORDERS: PSYGHODYNAMIC EITOLOGY
`
`1121
`
`psychiatric disorder, depression refers to an emotional state that
`can be present in normal persons at certain times, as well as in
`persons with characterological or psychotic conditions. More-
`over, simply because the patient does not have sufficient symp-
`toms to be given an Axis I diagnosis of a mood disorder does
`not mean that the depression is benign. In one study, employees
`with minor forms of depression that did not meet Axis Icriteria
`had 5] percent more disability days than did persons with a
`diagnosis of major depressive episode.
`
`Karl Abraham Most theories of mania view manic episodes
`as defensive against underlying depression. Karl Abraham, for
`example, believed that manic episodes may reflect an inability
`to tolerate childhood

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket