throbber
1of42
`
`A|ker_mes, Ex. 1055
`
`1 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`DEPARTNIENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`
`Publifi "Gall" SBMC6
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`NDA 21-436
`
`Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
`Attention: Gary Ingenito, M.D., Ph.D.
`President and Chief Operating Officer
`2440 Research Boulevard
`
`Rockville, MD 20850
`
`Dear Dr. lngenito:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) dated and received October 31, 2001, submitted
`under section 50S(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for Abilify (aripiprazole) 2, 5, 10,
`15, 20 and 30 mg Tablets
`"'
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions of September 18, October 8, and October 16, 2002.
`
`Your submission of September 18, 2002 constituted a complete response to our action letter of August
`29, 2002.
`
`This new drug application provides for the use of Abilify (aiipiprazole) tablets for the treatment of
`schizophreniair.
`
`We have completed our review of this application, as amended. It is approved, effective on the date of
`this letter, for use as recommended in the agreed-upon labeling text.
`
`We note your agreement to the attached labeling as well as the Phase 4 commitments and their
`corresponding time frame completion dates in an e-mail commtmication dated November 7, 2002.
`
`The final printed labeling (FPL) must be identical to the attached labeling (text for the package insert).
`Marketing the product with FPL that is not identical to the approved labeling text may render the
`product misbranded and an unapproved new drug.
`'
`
`Please submit an electronic version of the FPL according to the guidance for industry titled Providing
`Regulatory Submission in Electronic Format - NDA. For administrative purposes, designate this
`submission “FPL for approved NDA 21-436." Approval of this submission by FDA is not required
`before the labeling is used.
`'
`
`We remind you of your agreed-upon commitments of September 28, and November '3‘, 2002,
`conduct the following postmarketing studies:
`
`to
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`2 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`NDA 21-436
`Page 2
`
`A food effect study on the highest strength (30 mg).
`
`Within 2 months of_the date of this letter
`Protocol Submission:
`Within 4 months of the date of this letter
`Study Start:
`Final Report Submission: Within 15 months of the date of this letter
`
`We acknowledge that this timeline assumes that there is no need for Agency feedback on the
`protocol (standard food effect design will be employed) and that the 30 mg strength is tolerated
`by healthy volunteers.
`If this strength is not tolerated by healthy volunteers resulting in the
`need to conduct this study in schizophrenics, the timeline will be impacted and need to be re-
`negotiated with the Agency.
`
`Studies to determine whether or not doses lower than 10 mg are effective.
`
`Protocol Submission:
`
`Within 6 months of the date of this letter
`
`Study Start:
`Final Report Submission:
`
`Within 12 months of the date of this letter
`Within 42 months of the date of this letter
`
`'
`This timeline incorporates 2 months for Agency review of the design of the protocol. If this ,
`study demonstrates that lower doses are effective in the treatment of schizophrenia, the results;
`should be submitted to the NDA in the form of an efficacy supplement.
`
`to
`Studies to further characterize (e.g., reversibility, ftmctional correlates) and, if possible,
`determine the mecha.nism(s) underlying the retinal degeneration observed in the 26-week and
`2-year carcinogenicity studies in Sprague—Dawley rat.
`
`Protocol Submission:
`
`Within 5 months of the date of this letter
`
`Study Start:
`Final Report Submission:
`
`Within 8 months of the date of this letter
`Within 42 months of the date of this letter
`lb]
`
`_ _ Sprague-Dawley (SD)_ albino rats
`_
`lesion observed in _H___ __
`Since the retinal
`administered high doses of aripiprazole has morphologic features characteristic of light-induced
`retinopathy,
`it
`is critical
`that
`the potential
`for aripiprazole-related ocular changes be
`investigated in a pigmented rat
`strain _that
`is
`less susceptible to light-induced retinal
`degeneration to rule out a dire§_],_e_f_l_'ect of drug. Therefore, a one-month oral tolerability and
`toxicokinetic study in female ':__'_'—f"'--‘
`rats will be initiated in November, 2002 to
`detennine the suitability of this pigmented rat strain for studying the pathogenesis of the retiwil
`degen_eration_in SD rats. If the clinical tolerability and systemic exposure to aripiprazole in
`rats are comparable to that observed in Sprague-Dawley rats at doses resulting in re)--al
`changes, then a draft protocol for the definitive study evaluating the functional consequences,
`reversibility, and pathogenesis of retinal degeneration will be submitted within 5 monthsapf the
`approval letter. If clinical tolerability or systemic exposure to aripiprazole is lower in '_:_-mats
`than in SD rats at comparable doses, then an additional TKr'tolerability study in alternate strains
`of pigmented rats will be conducted prior to initiation of the definitive study. We acknowledge
`that this additional pilot study will add approximately 3 to 4 months to the timeline for protocol
`submission, study start, and final report dates each.
`
`'
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`3 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`NDA 21-436
`
`Page 3
`
`4.
`
`Studies investigating the abuse liability of aiipiprazole.
`
`Protocol Submission:
`
`NIA
`
`Study Start:
`Final Report Submission:
`
`July 22, 2002
`Within 5 months of the date of this letter __
`
`We aclcnowledge that you are currently conducting an abuse liability study in monkeys in
`Japan. The timeline above incorporates roughly 2 months needed to translate the protocol into
`English.
`
`5.
`
`Submit the results of Study 138047 to address the longer-term efficacy of aripiprazole in the
`treatment of adults with schizophrenia.
`
`We acknowledge that this study has already been completed and that the safety data were
`reported as part of the 120 Day Safety Update. However, a formal submission of the results of
`this study will be submitted within 30 days of the date of the approval letter. This submission
`should be submitted to the NDA as an efficacy supplement.
`
`Submit nonclinical and chemistry,
`this product.
`IND for
`Submit clinical protocols to your
`manufacturing, and controls protocols and all study final reports to this NDA.
`In addition, under '21
`CPR 3l4.8l{b)(2)(vii) and 314.8l(b)(2)(viii), you should include a status
`summary of each
`commitment
`in your annual report to this NDA. The status summary should include expected
`summary completion and final report submission dates, any changes in plans since the last annual
`report, and, for clinical studies, number of patients entered into each study. All submissions, including
`supplements,
`relating to these postmarketing study commitments must be prominently labeled
`“Postmarketing Study Protocol”, “Postmarketing Study Final Report”, or “Postmarketing Study
`Correspondence."
`
`The text in italics below addresses the application of FDA's Pediatric Rule at [21 CFR 314.55r‘21 CFR
`601.27] to this NDA. The Pediatric Rule has been challenged in court. On October 1?, 2002, the court
`ruled that FDA did not have the authority to issue the Pediatric Rule and has barred FDA from
`enforcing it. The government has not yet decided whether to seek a stay of the court's order.
`In
`addition, the government has not yet decided whether to appeal the decision; an appeal must be filed
`within 60 days. Therefore, this letter contains a description of the pediatric studies that would be
`required under the Pediatric Rule, if the Pediatric Rule remained in effect and/or were upheld
`on appeal. Please be aware that whether or not these pediatric studies will be required will depend '
`upon the resolution of the litigation. FDA will notify you as soon as possible as to whether this
`application will be subject to the requirements of the Pediatric Rule as described below.
`In any event,
`we hope you will decide to conduct these pediauic studies to provide important information on the safe
`and effective use of this drug in the relevant pediatric populations.
`
`All applications for new active ingredients. new dosage forms. new indications. new routes of
`administration, and new dosing regimens must contain an assessment of the safety and eflecriveness of
`the product in pediatric patients unless this requirement is waived or deferred (21 CFR 3i4.55).
`
`Based ‘on information submitted, we are deferring submission of pediatric studies until January I,
`2007.
`
`4 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`4 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`NDA 21-436
`
`Page 4
`
`The pediatric exclusivity provisions of FDAMA as reauthorized by the Best Pharmaceuticals for
`Children Act are not affected by the court's ruling. Pediatric studies conducted under the terms of
`section 505A of the‘ Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act may result
`in additional marketing
`exclusivity for certain products (pediatric exclusivity). You should refer to the Guidance for Industry
`on Qualifying for Pediatric Exclusivity (available on our web site at www.fda.gov/cderlpediatric) for
`details.
`If you wish to qualify for pediatric exclusivity you should submit a "Proposed Pediatric Study
`Request". FDA generally does not consider studies submitted to an NDA before issuance of a Written
`Request as responsive to the Written Request. Applicants should obtain a Written Request before
`submitting pediatric studies to an NDA.
`
`Please note that we have approved an expiration date of 2'4 months for all strengths of this drug
`product.
`
`In addition, submit three copies of the introductory promotional materials that you propose to use for
`this product. Submit all proposed materials-in draft or mock-up form, not final print. Send one copy to
`this division and two copies of both the promotional materials and the package insert directly to:
`
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD-42
`Food and Drug Administration
`5600 Fishers Lane
`
`Roclcville, MD 2085?
`
`Validation of the regulatory methods has not been completed. At the present time, it is the policy of
`the Center not to withhold approval_ because the methods are being validated. Nevertheless, we expect
`your continued cooperation to resolve any problems that may be identified.
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA (21 CFR
`314.80 and 314.81).
`
`If you have any questions, call Steven D. Hardeman, R.Ph., Senior Regulatory Project Manager at
`(301) 594-5525.
`-
`
`' Sincerely,
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`Robert Temple, M.D.
`Director
`
`Office of Drug Evaluation I
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`Enclosure
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`5 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`This is a represantat
`this page isthe rnani
`--uI-—n-—-
`
`is!
`
`Robert Temple
`l1fl5/U2 03:41:12 PM
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`OH ORIGINAL
`
`6 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`apphcaflgn 1g,,mVm 2 I-‘-I 36 V
`
`7 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`7 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`h"I‘l u‘ f K
`
`
`
`3" /(C DEPARTMENTorHEALTH&HUMANSERVICES I PublicHealthService
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Roclwille MD 20857
`
`NDA 21-436
`
`Otsuka Pharmaceutical C0,, Ltd.
`
`Attention: Gary Ingenito, M.D., Ph._D.
`President and Chief Operating Officer
`2440 Research Boulevard
`
`Rockville, MD 20850
`
`Dear Dr. Ingenito:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) dated October 31, 200] , received October 31, 2002,
`submitted under section 505(b) ofthe Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for Ability (aripiprazole) 2, 5, IO_,
`15, 20 and 30 mg Tablets.
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions as follows:
`
`December 21, 2001
`
`January 17, 2002
`
`February 1, 2002
`
`Febmary 12, 2002
`
`February 25, 2002
`
`February 27, 2002
`
`March 15, 2002
`
`March 20, 2002
`
`
`
`March 22, 2002
`
`March 29, 2002
`
`April 4, 2002
`
`April 10, 2002
`
`April 15, 2002
`
`April 16, 2002
`
`April 29, 2002
`
`May 8, 2002
`
`May 9, 2002
`
`May 10, 2002
`
`'
`
`May 15, 2002
`
`May 31, 2002
`
`June 3, 2002
`June 7, 2002
`June 24, 2002
`Juw29.2oo2 —
`
`July 10, 2002
`
`We have completed the review ofthis application, as amended, and it is approvable. Before this application may
`be approved, however, it will be necessary for you to address the following:
`
`Clinical Pharmacolligy and Biopharmaceutlcs
`
`Please adopt the following dissolution method and specification for all strengths ofaripiprazole tablets (2, 5, 10,
`15, 20 and 30 mg):
`I
`
`- Apparatus: USP Apparatus 2 (paddles) at 60 rpm
`
`8‘of42'
`
`'
`
`’
`
`'
`
`-
`
`'A|ke‘rmes, Ex:1055_
`
`8 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`NDA 21-436
`
`Page 2
`
`' 900 mL of 0.1 N HCl (pH 1.2) at 37=eo.5 c°
`- Medium:
`-
`Specification: """"""""'
`in 30min
`
`Clinical
`
`We note that, for several patients, there were abnomial laboratory findings present at the last visit, but no followup _
`information. We ask that you attempt to find and provide followup laboratory and other information on the
`following patients:
`
`138001-33-102
`
`elevated SGOT
`
`97201-36-18
`
`elevated SGOT
`
`138001-7-458
`
`elevated CPK
`
`' 97202-‘ll-19
`
`97202-89-6
`
`low platelet count
`
`138001-7-281
`
`low platelet count
`
`low platelet count
`
`Chemistry
`
`Establishment inspections:
`
`The Bristol drug product manufacturing, packaging. and release testing facility located in Mayaguez. PR
`(CFN #262?'673) was found to be unacceptable by the FDA's Office of Compliance. We note that your
`application describes other facilities that perform these functions.
`If you plan to utilize the Mayaguez.
`PR site (CFN #2627673). a satisfactory inspection will be needed, otherwise the site should be
`withdrawn from the NDA.
`
`Drug Substance and Drug Product:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Please provide detailed methodology for the identification of aripiprazole drug substance by IR.
`Please provide detailed information supporting the use of your drug substance packaging. Any
`relevant DMF information should include appropriate letters of authorization (LOAS). which
`clearly indicate (by name, part number, etc.) the item (5) referenced in the DMF. and their precise
`location and'date of inclusion in the DMF.
`
`Please include a sample of the label to be used for the drug substance during shipping and
`storage. The label should clearly indicate the name of the bulk substance. the identifying lot or
`control number. and the storage condition for the drug substance.
`Please provide the limit of detection and the limit of quantitation fort:
`for the Determination of Impurities and Degradation Products.
`
`in the method
`
`
`
`' "9‘or4"2 '
`
`'
`
`1 Anlkermwels, Ex.-1055
`
`9 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`NDA 21-436
`
`Page 3
`
`Please provide a certificate of analysis for each of the drug product excipients.
`
`
`
`" Please explain.
`_
`Please provide a complete and detailed description of the secondary packaging systems for the
`HDPE bottles and blister strips. Your response should include specifications and in-process
`controls.
`
`On page 50 of volume 1.4 you state "In the case of the aluminumfalurninum cold-fonn blisters.
`the primary packaging components are identical to those employed in the primary stability
`batches. except for the foil lidding.
`In this case. paper-backed aluminum foil laminate was used
`for the primary stability batches. whereas the batches intended for marketing will use either the
`same.. .or a plain (non-paper-backed) aluminum foil laminate of identical structure, composition
`and moisture and oxygen barrier properties. " Please provide the appropriate data to demonstrate
`that these packaging systems are equivalent.
`On page 101 in the drug product stress stability section, you indicated that you would include data
`for the 2. 5. 10. 15, 20 and 30 mg tablets at 25CI60% RH and 40C/75% RH in the open petri
`dish. however. you only included data for the 15. 20 and 30 mg tablets. Please provide stability
`data for the 2. 5 and 10 mg tablets at 25C/60% RH and 40Ci75% RH in the open petri dish..
`Please provide updated drug substance stability data.
`'
`Please provide updated stability data for "the 2. 5. 10. 15. 20 and 30 mg tablets manufactured at
`the Mayaguez. Puerto Rico facility.
`'
`Please provide updated drug product release specifications which reflect the biopharm dissolution
`recommendation.
`
`The 1987 FDA Guidance for Submitting Samples and Analytical Data for Methods Validation
`indicates that four copies of the Methods Validation Package should be included with your
`original submission. Accordingly, we request that you submit two additional copies of the
`Methods Validation Package.
`The proposed carton and blister backing for the drug product has the name Abi1itat(an'piprazole)
`. Tablets listed as thename of the drug product. This name was not accepted by the Office of Post-
`Marketing Drug Risk Assessment (OPDRAJ. Please commit to submitting revised container
`closure information for the new proprietary name, Abilify.
`Labels for the secondary packaging of the cold-form blisters were provided. however. you did
`not provide labels for folding cartons (30. 60. 90 and 500 count bottles) of the drug product.
`Please indicate if you plan to use secondary packaging for these bottles and if so please provide
`draft labeling for each strength.
`
`U1
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`Foreign Regulatory.Update!Labe|ing-
`
`We require a review of the status of all aripiprazole actions taken or pending before foreign regulatory
`authorities. Approval actions can be noted, but we ask that you describe in detail any and all actions taken that
`have been negative, supplying a full explanation of the views of all parties and the resolution of the matter. If
`
`'1o:¢r 42 '
`
`' W
`
`‘
`
`Alkermes, Ex.-1"O55
`
`10 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`NDA 21-436
`
`Page 4
`
`aripiprazole has been approved by any non-US regulatory bodies, we ask that you provide us any approved
`labeling for aripiprazole along with English translations when needed.
`
`World Literature Update
`
`Prior to the approval ofaripiprazole, we require an updated report on the world archival literature pertaining to
`the safety ofaripiprazole. This report should include only literature not covered in your previous submissions. We
`need your warrant that you have reviewed this literature systematically, and in detail, and that you have discovered
`no finding that would adversely affect conclusions about the safety ofaripiprazole. The report should also detail
`how the literature search was conducted, by whom (their credentials) and whether it relied on abstracts or full
`texts (including translations) ofarticles. The report should emphasize clinical data, but new findings in pre—clinical
`reports ofpotential significance should also be described. Should any report or finding be judged important, a
`copy (translated as required) should be submitted for our review.
`
`Labeling
`
`Please submit revised draft labeling for the dmg. The labeling shlou-ld be identical in content to the enclosed
`(text for the package insert).
`
`-
`
`Ifadditional infonnation relating to the safety or effectiveness ofthis drug becomes available, revision ofthe
`labeling may be required.
`
`Safety Update
`
`Our assessment of the safety of aripiprazole is based on our review of all safety information provided
`in your original and subsequent submissions, including your safety update of Februaiy 27, 2002. Please provide '
`a final serious events update to include serious adverse events up to a more recent cutoff date.
`
`Post Approval (-Phase 4) Commitments
`
`1 .
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Due to the limited solubility ofaripiprazole and non-rapid dissolving nature ofthe tablet in gastric pH (pH
`1.2), we ask that you commit to conducting a food effect study on the highest strength (30 mg).
`
`In each ofthe 3 positive fixed dose studies, the lowest dose (10, 15, or 20 mg) was numerically superior
`to all the higher doses. You have thus not adequately explored the lower end of the dose response curve
`for effectiveness. We ask that you commit to conducting, postapproval, additional studies to detennine
`whether or not doses lower than l0 mg are effective.
`
`To address the longer-terrn efficacy ofaripiprazole in the treatment ofadults with schizophrenia, we
`request that you submit, post-approval, the results of Study 138047.
`
`11:of'42" '
`
`‘
`
`Alkermesi, Ex.- 1055
`
`11 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`NDA 21-436
`
`Page 5
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`We ask that you commit to conducting,-postapproval, additional studies in order to further characterize
`(e.g. , reversibility, functional correlates) and, ifpossible, to determine the rnechanism(s) underlying the
`retinal degeneration observed in the 26-wk and 2-yr carcinogenicity studies in Sprague-Dawley rat.
`
`The data from studies conducted in rhesus monkey suggest that aripiprazole may have some abuse
`liability. One of 4 monkeys trained to self-administer cocaine continued to self-administer when
`aripiprazole was substituted for cocaine. In addition, 4 of4 monkeys exhibited withdrawal symptoms
`following abmpt cessation ofdosing with aripiprazole. Although self-stimulation was not observed in rats
`when aripiprazole was substituted for cocaine, there was a tendency for animals to exhibit withdrawal
`symptoms following abnipt cessation ofclosing. Therefore, we ask that you corrunit to conducting,
`postapproval, additional studies investigating the abuse liability of aripiprazole.
`
`Within 10 days after the date ofdue letter, you are required to amend the application, notify us ofyour intent to
`file an amendment, or follow one ofyour other options under 21 CFR 314.1 10. In the absence ofany such action
`FDA may proceed to withdraw the application. Any amendment should respond to all the deficiencies listed.
`We will not process a partial reply as a major amendment nor will the review clock be reactivated until all _
`deficiencies have been addressed.
`
`The drug product may not be legally marketed until you have been notified in writing that the application is
`approved.
`
`Ifyou have any questions, call Steven D. Hardeman, R.Ph., Senior Regulatory Project Manager, at (301)
`594-5525.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`{See appended electroiiic signature page}
`
`Robert Temple, MD.
`Director
`
`-
`
`Office of Drug Evaluation I
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`attachment - labeling
`
`1-2' of'.42'
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`- Alkermes, Ex: 1055
`
`12 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`
`
`Draft Labeling
`(not releasable;
`
`
`
`W
`
`Number of Pages
`Redacted 29‘
`
`13 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`14 of42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`14 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`Enclosure
`
`[We note your agreement to the labeling below in an electronic
`communication dated November 15, 2002. Additionally, we note
`that, at this time, you intend to market only the 10 mg, 15 mg, 20
`mg, and 30 mg dosage strengths. However,
`the Agency is
`approving all of the following dosage strengths: 2 mg, 5 mg, 10
`mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 30 mg. Additionally, for completeness, we
`are including these dosage strengths into the labeling.]
`
`ABILIFY"
`(a ripiprazole)
`Tablets
`
`~
`
`‘Rx only
`
`_
`DESCRIPTION
`ABILIFYW (aripiprazole) is a psychotropic drug that is available as tablets for oral
`
`administration. Aripiprazole is 7-[4-[4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-1-piperazinyl]butoxy}-3,4-
`
`dihydrocarbostyril. The empirical fomiula is C231-l27ChN3O2 and its molecular weight is
`
`- '_.‘\
`448.38. The chemical structure is:
`.-"'
`
`’
`
`‘
`
`N-CH2CH2CH2C H20
`\_/
`
`vi)‘
`
`.7
`
`/
`
`pl‘
`
`0
`
`ABILIFY tablets are available in 2-mg, 5-mg, 10-mg, 15-mg, 20-mg, and 30-mg
`strengths. Inactive ingredients include lactose _monohydrate',. comstagch, micnocrystalline
`cell__i_1l§iie, hydroigjaropyl and‘
`stearate. Coloiants include fe1_'_ric
`oxide (yellow or red) and FD&.C li"u‘l'if1'e~'-l*;~lo.2 Alumiiimn I-zake.
`
`CLlNICAL'l’HARMACOLOGY
`
`Pharmacodyuamics
`
`Aripiprazole exhibits high affinity for dopamine D2 and D5, serotonin 5-HT“, and 5-HT”
`receptors (K, values of 0.34, 0.8, 1.7, and 3.4 nM, respectively), moderate affinity for
`dopamine D4, serotonin S-HT2c and 5-HT-;, alpha;-adrenergic and histamine I-I1 receptors
`(K, values of 44, 15, 39, 57, and 61 nM, respectively), and moderate affinity for the
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`15 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`serotonin reuptake site (K, = 98 nM). Aripipfazole has no appreciable affinity for
`cholinergic muscarinic receptors (IC50 5 1000 nM). Aripiprazole functions as a partial
`agonist at the dopamine Q and the serotonin 5-HT1A receptors, and as an antagonist at
`serotonin 5-HT2;. receptor.
`
`The mechanism of action of aripiprazole, as with other drugs having efficacy in
`schizophrenia,
`is unknown. However,
`it has been proposed that
`the efficacy of
`aripiprazole is mediated through a combination of partial agonist activity at Q and 5-
`HTIA receptors and antagonist activity at 5-HT2A receptors. Actions at receptors other
`than D2, 5-HT1A, and 5-HT“ may explain some of the other clinical effects of
`aripiprazole, eg, the orthostatic hypotension observed with aripiprazole may be explained
`by its antagonist activity at adrenergic alpha. receptors.
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`ABILIFY activity is presumably primarily due to the parent drug, aripiprazole, and to a
`lesser extent, to its major metabolite dehydro-aripiprazole, which has been shown to have
`affinities for Q receptors similar to the parent drug and represents 40% of the parent
`drug exposure in plasma. The mean elimination half-lives are about 75 hours and 94
`hours for aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole, respectively. Steady-state concentrations
`are attained within 14 days of closing for both active moieties. Aripiprazole accumulation
`is predictable from single-dose pharmacokinetics. At steady state, the phannacokinetics
`of aripiprazole .are dose-proportional. Elimination of aripiprazole is mainly through
`hepatic metabolism involving two P450 isozymes, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4.
`
`A bsorption
`
`Aripiprazole is well absorbed, with peak plasma concentrations occurring within 3 to 5
`hours; the absolute oral bioavailability of the tablet formulation is 87%. ABILIFY can be
`administered with or without food. Administration of a 15-mg ABILIFY tablet with a
`standard high-fat meal did not significantly affect the Cmax or AUC of aripiprazole or its
`active metabolite, dehydro-aripiprazole, but delayed Tmax by 3 hours for aripiprazole
`and 12 hours for dehydro-aripiprazole.
`‘
`
`Distribution
`
`following intravenous
`steady-state volume of distribution of aripiprazole
`The
`administration is high (40-t_l_ L or 4.9 Ukg), indicating extensive extravascular distribution.
`At therapeutic concentrations, aripiprazole and its major metabolite are greater than 99%
`bound to serum proteins, primarily to albumin. In healthy human volunteers administered
`0.5 to 30 mg/day aripiprazole for 14 days,
`there was dose-dependent D;-receptor
`occupancy indicating brain penetration of aripiprazole in humans.
`
`'Metabolism and Elimination
`
`pathways:
`biotransformation
`three
`by
`primarily
`is metabolized
`Aripiprazole
`dehydrogenation, hydroxylation, and N-deallcylation. Based on in virro studies, CYP3A4
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`16 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`and CYP2D6 enzymes are responsible for dehydrogenation and hydroxylation of
`aripiprazole,
`and N-deallcylation is catalyzed by CYP3A4. Aripiprazole
`is
`the
`predominant drug moiety in the systemic circulation. At steady state, dehydro-
`aripiprazole, the active metabolite, represents about 40% of aripiprazole AUC in plasma.
`
`Approximately 8% of Caucasians lack the capacity to metabolize CYPZD6 substrates and
`are classified as poor metabolizers (PM), whereas the rest are extensive metabolizers
`(EM). PMs have about an 80% increase in aripiprazole exposure and about a 30%
`decrease in exposure to the active metabolite compared to EMS, resulting in about a 60%
`higher exposure to the total active moieties from a given dose of aripiprazole compared to
`EMs. Coadministration of ABILIFY with known inhibitors of CYPZD6, like quinidine in
`EMs results in a 112% increase in aripiprazole plasma exposure, and dosing adjustment is
`needed (see PRECAUTIONS: Drug-Drug Interactions). The mean elimination half-lives
`are about 7'5 hours and 146 hours for aripiprazole in EMS and PMs, respectively.
`Aripiprazole does not inhibit or induce the CYPZD6 pathway.
`
`Following a single oral dose of [”C]-labeled aripiprazole, approximately 25% and 55%
`of the administered radioactivity was recovered in the urine and feces, respectively. Less
`than 1% of unchanged aripiprazole was excreted in the urine and approximately 18% of
`the oral dose was recovered unchanged in the feces.
`
`Special Populations
`
`In general, no dosage adjustment. for ABILIFY is required on the basis of a patient’s age,
`gender, race, smoking status, hepatic fimction, or renal function (see DOSAGE AND
`ADMINISTRATION: Dosage in Special Populations).
`The phannacokinetics of
`aripiprazole in special populations are described below.
`
`Hepatic Impairment
`
`In a single-dose study (15 mg of aripiprazole) in subjects with varying degrees of liver
`cirrhosis Child-Pugh Classes A, B, and C), the AUC of aripiprazole, compared to
`healthy subjects, increased 31% in mild HI, increased 8% in moderate HI, and decreased
`20% in severe HI. None of these differences would require dose adjustment.
`
`Renal Impairment
`
`In patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL:"min), Cmax of
`aripiprazole (given in a single dose of 15 mg) and dehydro-aripiprazole increased by 36%
`and 53%, re'§pectively, but AUC was 15% lower for aripiprazole and 7% higher for
`dehydro—aripiprazole. Renal excretion of both unchanged aripiprazole and dehydro-
`aripiprazole is less than 1% of the dose. No dosage adjustment is required in subjects
`with renal impairment.
`
`Elderly
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`17 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`In formal single-dose phannacokinetic studies (with aripiprazole given in a single dose of
`15 mg), aripiprazole clearance was 20% lower in elderly (265 years) subjects compared
`to younger adult subjects (18-64 years). There was no detectable age effect, however, in
`the
`population
`pharmacokinetic
`analysis
`in
`schizophrenia
`patients. Also,
`the
`phannacokinetics of aripiprazole after multiple doses in elderly patients appeared similar
`to that observed in young healthy subjects. No dosage adjustment is recommended for
`elderly patients. (see PRECAUTIONS: Geriatric Use).
`
`Gender
`
`Cmax and_AUC of aripiprazole and its active metabolite, dehydro-aripiprazole, are 30-
`-40% higher in women than in men, and correspondingly, the apparent oral clearance of
`aripiprazole is lower in women. These differences, however, are largely explained by
`differences in body weight (25%) between men and women. No dosage adjustment is
`recommended based on gender.
`
`Race
`
`Although no specific pharmacokinetic study was conducted to investigate the effects of
`race on the disposition of aripiprazole, population pharmacokinetic evaluation revealed
`no evidence of clinically significant race-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of
`aripiprazole. No dosage adjustment is recommended based on race.
`
`Smoking
`
`Based on studies utilizing human liver enzymes in virro, aripiprazole is not a substrate for
`CYP1A2 and also does not undergo direct glucuronidation. Smoking should, therefore,
`not have an effect on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole. Consistent with these in virro
`results, population pharmacokinetic
`evaluation did not
`reveal
`any
`significant
`pharmacokinetic differences between smokers and nonsmokers. No dosage adjustment is
`recommended based on smoking status.
`
`Drug-Drug Interactions
`
`Potentialfor Other Drugs to Aflect ABILIFY
`
`Aripiprazole is not a substrate‘ of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8,
`CYPZC9, CYP2Cl9, or CYP2El enzymes. Aripiprazole also does not undergo direct
`glucuronidation. This suggests that an interaction of aripiprazole with inhibitors or
`inducers of these enzymes, or other factors, like smoking, is unlikely.
`
`Both CYP3A4 and CYPZD6 are responsible for aripiprazole metabolism. Agents that
`induce CYP3A4 (eg, carbamazepine) could cause an increase in aripiprazole clearance
`and lower blood levels. Inhibitors of CYP3A4 (cg, ketoconazole) or CYP2D6 (eg,
`quinidine,
`fluoxetine, or paroxetine) can inhibit aripiprazole elimination and cause
`increased blood levels.
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`18 of 42
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1055
`
`

`
`Potentialfor ABILIFY to Aflect Other Drugs
`
`Aripiprazole is unlikely to cause clinically important pharmacokinetic interactions with
`drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes.
`In in vivo studies, 10- to 30-mg/day
`doses of aripiprazole had no significant
`effect on metabolism by CYPZD6
`(dextromethorphan), CYPZC9 (warfarin), CYP2C19
`(omeprazole, warfarin),
`and
`CYP3A4 (dextromethorphan)
`substrates. Additionally, aripiprazole and dehydro-
`aripiprazole did not show potential for altering CYP1A2-mediated metabolism in vttro
`(see Precautions: Drug-Drug Interactions).
`'
`
`Arrpiprazofe had no clinically important interactions with thefotlowing drugs:
`
`Famotidine: Coadministration of aripiprazole (given in a single dose of 15 mg) with a 40-
`mg single dose of tlie H; antagonist famotidine, a potent gastric acid blocker, decreased
`the solubilit

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket