throbber
Bipolar Disorders 2001: 3: 165–173
`Printed in Ireland. All rights reser6ed
`
`Original Article
`
`Medication prescribing patterns for patients
`with bipolar I disorder in hospital settings:
`adherence to published practice guidelines
`
`Lim PZ, Tunis SL, Edell WS, Jensik SE, Tohen M. Medication pre-
`scribing patterns for patients with bipolar I disorder in hospital set-
`tings: adherence to published practice guidelines.
`Bipolar Disord 2001: 3: 165–173. © Munksgaard, 2001
`
`Objecti7e: The purposes of this paper were to examine the medication
`prescribing patterns for bipolar I disorder in hospital settings and to
`compare them to recently published expert consensus guidelines for
`medication treatment of bipolar disorder.
`
`Methods: Data were obtained from the 1996–2000 CQI+ SM Outcomes
`Measurement System, on patients age 18 or older admitted to psychi-
`atric inpatient units from over 100 medical–surgical hospitals. A total
`of 1864 patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of bipolar I or II
`disorder were identified from a large cohort of hospitalized patients.
`Patient characteristics were assessed at hospital admission and medica-
`tion usage, at discharge. The medication analysis focused on the 1471
`individuals with bipolar I mania or bipolar I depression (with or with-
`out psychotic features), representing 54% and 25% of admitted bipolar
`patients, respectively.
`
`Results: At admission, the typical bipolar patient (mean age 57) had
`experienced a relatively severe and chronic course of illness. The array
`of psychotropic agents used was broad, with no single prescribing pat-
`tern predominant. Only one in three bipolar I (manic or depressed)
`patients with psychotic features was discharged on medications recom-
`mended by expert guidelines as preferred or alternate recommended
`treatment. Absent psychotic features, this dropped to one in six pa-
`tients. Surprising was the relatively high use of antidepressants for pa-
`tients with mania, particularly those without psychotic symptoms.
`
`Conclusions: Results suggest that a substantial proportion of patients
`with bipolar I disorder are discharged from hospitals on medications
`not generally recommended by current practice guidelines.
`
`Prudence Z Lima, Sandra
`L Tunisa, William S Edellb,
`Sarah E Jensikb and
`Mauricio Tohena,c
`a Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis,
`IN, USA, b Mental Health Outcomes,
`Lewisville, TX, USA, c McLean Hospital,
`Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA,
`USA
`
`Key words: bipolar I disorder – hospital
`settings – medication prescribing patterns
`
`Received 7 May 2000, revised and
`accepted for publication 7 March 2001
`
`Corresponding author: Sandra L Tunis,
`PhD, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis,
`IN 46285, USA, e-mail:
`tunis–sandra@lilly.com
`
`Disease impact
`Bipolar I disorder is a chronic and often devastat-
`ing disease that affects about 1.0% of the general
`population (1–6). Severe physical and psychosocial
`impairments are common (2, 7), which have been
`associated with high rates of medical and psychi-
`atric care, family dysfunction, divorce, substance
`abuse and suicide (8–10). To illustrate this, bipolar
`disorder was ranked sixth among the top ten lead-
`ing worldwide causes of disability-adjusted life
`years in 1990 for persons aged 15–44 years (11).
`
`The direct and indirect economic costs of bipo-
`lar disorder are staggering (12). One decade ago, it
`was estimated that the total costs of the disorder
`exceeded $45 billion in the USA alone (13). More
`recent work suggests that the health care costs for
`bipolar disorder exceed those for depression or
`diabetes (14). The mortality rates for untreated
`bipolar disorder are comparable to many types of
`heart disease and cancer, with rates of death by
`suicide (around 19%) perhaps the highest for any
`psychiatric or medical disorder (9).
`
`165
`
`1 of 9
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1053
`
`

`
`Lim et al.
`
`Treatment guidelines
`
`The successful management of bipolar I disorder
`depends on early detection, appropriate pharmaco-
`logic and psychosocial treatments, and an under-
`standing of the long-term cyclic, recurrent, and
`relapsing nature of
`the disorder. Recurrent
`episodes of mania and depression, often secondary
`to medication noncompliance (15–18), have a de-
`teriorative effect on patient functioning, response
`to treatment and prognosis (7, 9, 19–22). To
`provide guidance to psychiatrists and other mental
`health professionals about the most appropriate
`treatments for patients with bipolar disorder, vari-
`ous practice guidelines and treatment algorithms
`have been developed. The hope is that such guide-
`lines will reduce unnecessary variation in clinical
`practice, facilitate rational clinical decision-mak-
`ing, improve quality of care, increase efficiency of
`treatment and allow for systematic examination of
`specific treatments on outcomes (23).
`Some guidelines have been developed by panels
`of recognized experts [International Psychophar-
`macology Algorithm Project (24); European Al-
`gorithm Project (25, 26)]. Others have used panels
`of experts combined with additional detailed com-
`mentary from clinicians in the field [American Psy-
`chiatric Association (APA) (8); Canadian Network
`for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT)
`(27, 28); Department of Veterans Affairs (29)]. The
`Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) (23,
`30) was generally based on the 1996 Expert Con-
`sensus Guidelines (31) and the 1994 APA Guideli-
`nes. The 2000 Expert Consensus Guidelines (32)
`were developed most
`rigorously, using survey
`methodology (33) with 65 leading American ex-
`perts on bipolar disorder, and the RAND modified
`Delphi approach for ascertaining expert consensus
`(34).
`For the purpose of this descriptive analysis, ac-
`tual practice patterns for bipolar I mania and bipo-
`lar I depression were compared with the 2000
`Expert Consensus Guidelines (32, 35). Table 1
`summarizes the preferred strategies and alternate
`strategies for pharmacotherapies recommended by
`the 2000 Expert Consensus Guidelines for bipolar I
`mania (with, or without psychotic features) and for
`bipolar I depression (with, or without psychotic
`features).
`The specific mood stabilizers recommended for
`all clinical presentations of bipolar mania or bipo-
`lar depression include lithium, valproate and carba-
`mazepine.
`In addition, a new anticonvulsant
`lamotrigine is recommended for bipolar depression.
`Atypical antipsychotics are preferred by the Expert
`Consensus Guidelines over conventional antipsy-
`
`166
`
`chotics as first-line adjunctive treatment for bipolar
`mania and for psychotic bipolar depression, partic-
`ularly when long-term use (2–5 months following
`resolution of acute episode) is required. Specific
`antidepressant agents recommended for bipolar
`depression include buproprion, the selective sero-
`tonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and venlaxafine.
`No guidance regarding specific benzodiazepines to
`use with bipolar patients is provided.
`
`Study purpose
`
`While the treatment recommendations specified in
`published guidelines may not address the specific
`and unique needs of every bipolar patient, and are
`not intended to represent standards of medical care
`per se (36), they do provide a helpful clinical
`framework. Describing the psychotropic agents
`prescribed for bipolar patients admitted to a psy-
`chiatric unit in acute-care hospitals throughout the
`USA can be informative regarding current treat-
`ment practices in this important setting. The spe-
`cific objective of
`this
`study was
`to profile
`clinician-prescribing practices for bipolar patients
`within hospital settings, and to delineate the extent
`to which they are consistent with recently pub-
`lished treatment guidelines.
`
`Methods
`Data source
`
`Retrospective analyses were conducted on data
`collected between January 1, 1996 and March 31,
`2000. Data came from the CQI+ SM Outcomes
`
`Table 1. Pharmacologic therapies recommended by Expert Consensus
`Guidelines (32)
`
`Bipolar I mania with psychotic features
`Mood stabilizer and antipsychotic
`Mood stabilizer, antipsychotic and benzodiazepine
`
`Bipolar I mania without psychotic features
`Mood stabilizer alone
`Mood stabilizer and benzodiazepine
`Mood stabilizer and antipsychotic
`
`Bipolar I depression with psychotic features
`Mood stabilizer, antipsychotic and antidepressant
`Electroconvulsive therapy
`Mood stabilizer and antipsychotic
`Mood stabilizer and antidepressant
`
`Bipolar I depression without psychotic features
`Mood stabilizer and antidepressant
`Mood stabilizer alone
`Electroconvulsive therapy
`
`Preferred treatments specified within the Expert Consensus
`Guidelines (32) are italicized. Alternate treatments specified within
`the Expert Consensus Guidelines (32) are not italicized.
`
`2 of 9
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1053
`
`

`
`Prescribing patterns and adherence to bipolar practice guidelines
`
`Measurement System database developed by Men-
`tal Health Outcomes in Lewisville, TX. The system
`tracks information on patients, age 18 and older,
`admitted to psychiatric inpatient units from over
`100 acute care medical–surgical hospitals in 31
`states.
`Patients with a diagnosis of bipolar I or II
`disorder represented a subset (n=1864 or 7.0%) of
`a large national cohort of patients (n=26559),
`hospitalized in psychiatric treatment programs
`across the USA. Included in the subset were bipo-
`lar patients aged 18–64 years admitted to adult
`psychiatric units (n=869), and patients aged 55
`years or older admitted to geropsychiatric units
`(n=995).
`
`Assessment procedures
`Programs participating in the CQISM+ System
`invite the first 17 patients admitted per month
`(regardless of diagnosis) to complete a series of
`assessments within 72 h of admission, within 48 h
`of discharge and at 3 months (geriatric programs)
`or 6 months (adult programs) following hospital
`discharge. Overall, the assessments include several
`self report, informant report, and clinician/staff-
`rating scales. For this study, demographic charac-
`teristics and clinical status variables of all patients
`with a primary discharge diagnosis of bipolar I or
`bipolar II disorder were selected from an admission
`questionnaire, completed by patients and infor-
`mants. Discharge medications were identified by a
`medication usage questionnaire, which was com-
`pleted by the hospital staff based on the patients’
`medical
`records. Clinician-prescribing patterns
`were analyzed only for the two largest subsets of
`bipolar patients [i.e. patients with bipolar I mania
`(ICD-9 Codes: 296.00–296.06) or with bipolar I
`depression (ICD-9 Codes: 296.50–296.56)].
`
`Results
`Patient demographics and diagnosis
`
`Patient demographics at admission are shown in
`Table 2. Overall, the bipolar group was 63% fe-
`male, predominantly Caucasian (90%), educated at
`a High School level or beyond (73%) and averaged
`57 years old (SD=20; range 18–102). About half
`(49%) were separated, divorced or widowed, with
`only one-third (33%) currently married. Most were
`unemployed or ‘retired’ (85%), and were living in
`their private residence (75%) prior to hospital
`admission.
`Bipolar I mania (n=1007 or 54%) and bipolar I
`depression (n=464 or 25%) (with or without psy-
`chotic features) represented the majority of bipolar
`
`Table 2. Admission assessment of demographic variables for bipolar I and
`II inpatients
`
`Variable
`
`1. Mean age9SD
`
`2. Race
`% Caucasian
`% African American
`
`3. Gender
`% Female
`
`4. Work status
`% Unemployed or ‘retired’
`
`5. Marital status
`% Never married
`% Married
`% Separated, divorced or widowed
`
`6. Living arrangement
`% Living at home (alone or with others)
`% Nursing home
`% Board and care
`% Other (e.g. retirement facility,
`hospital)
`
`7. Type of payora
`% Medicaid
`% Medicare
`% Private insurance
`
`8. Educational status
`% High School graduates or above
`
`Bipolar cohort
`(n=1864)
`
`57920
`
`90
`6
`
`63
`
`85
`
`18
`33
`49
`
`75
`9
`6
`10
`
`19
`57
`28
`
`73
`
`a Response choices within this category were not mutually exclu-
`sive.
`
`patients discharged from the hospital. Smaller
`groups of patients had a primary discharge diagno-
`sis of bipolar I mixed (n=306 or 16%) or bipolar
`II disorder (n=87 or 5%).
`
`Clinical status at hospital admission
`
`The typical patient in our overall bipolar sample
`had experienced a severe and chronic clinical his-
`tory. The most common secondary DSM-IV Axis
`I/II discharge diagnoses documented in the medi-
`cal record were personality disorder (14%) and
`substance-related disorder (11%). The majority
`(81%) had previously been hospitalized at least
`once for psychiatric reasons, with about 40% hav-
`ing been hospitalized four or more times for psy-
`chiatric reasons during their lifetime. In addition,
`approximately one-third reported attempting sui-
`cide at least once within their lifetime.
`
`Discharge medication prescribing patterns
`
`The frequencies (by percentage) of different phar-
`macologic therapies prescribed for bipolar I mania
`
`167
`
`3 of 9
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1053
`
`

`
`Lim et al.
`
`and bipolar I depression patients, presented sepa-
`rately for those with or without psychotic features,
`are listed in Tables 3 and 4. The vast majority of
`patients (89–98%) were discharged on at least one
`psychotropic agent. However, the array of agents
`used alone or in combination was broad. No single
`pharmacologic therapy was overwhelmingly pre-
`ferred by clinicians in the treatment of either bipo-
`lar I mania or bipolar I depression.
`
`Bipolar I mania
`
`The most common treatments for bipolar I mania
`with psychotic features (n=181) were a mood
`stabilizer/antipsychotic combination (29%), mood
`stabilizer alone (9%), mood stabilizer/antipsy-
`chotic/benzodiazepine combination (9%), antipsy-
`chotic alone (8%) or mood stabilizer/antipsy-
`chotic/antidepressant combination (8%).
`In contrast, bipolar I mania without psychotic
`features (n=796) was most commonly treated
`with an antidepressant alone (20%), a benzodi-
`azepine/antidepressant combination (10%) or a
`mood stabilizer/antipsychotic combination (9%).
`
`While only 2% of patients with bipolar I mania
`with psychotic features were prescribed no psy-
`chotropic agents at discharge, a higher percentage
`of patients with bipolar I mania without psychotic
`features received no psychotropic agents at dis-
`charge (11%).
`
`Bipolar I depression
`
`The most common treatments for bipolar I depres-
`sion with psychotic features (n=46) were an an-
`tipsychotic/antidepressant combination (20%), a
`mood stabilizer/antipsychotic/antidepressant com-
`bination (20%), an antidepressant alone (13%), or
`mood stabilizer/antipsychotic/antidepressant/ben-
`zodiazepine combination (11%). Bipolar I depres-
`sion without psychotic features (n=398) was most
`commonly treated with a mood stabilizer/antipsy-
`chotic/antidepressant combination (14%), a mood
`stabilizer/antidepressant/benzodiazepine combina-
`tion (11%), a mood stabilizer/antidepressant com-
`bination (10%) or an antidepressant alone (10%).
`The percentage of patients with bipolar I depres-
`sion with, or without psychotic features who were
`
`Table 3. Medication treatments for patients diagnosed with bipolar I mania
`
`Percentage
`
`Bipolar I mania with
`psychotic features
`(n=181)
`
`Bipolar I mania without
`psychotic features
`(n=796)
`
`55
`
`2
`20
`
`9
`2
`3
`
`17
`
`10
`
`5
`4
`3
`
`02
`
`10
`11
`2
`
`Mono-therapy
`Mood stabilizera alone
`Antipsychotic alone
`Benzodiazepine alone
`Antidepressant alone
`
`Dual-therapy
`Mood stabilizer and antipsychotic
`Mood stabilizer and benzodiazepine
`Mood stabilizer and antidepressant
`Antipsychotic and benzodiazepine
`Antipsychotic and antidepressant
`Benzodiazepine and antidepressant
`
`Poly-therapy
`Mood stabilizer, antipsychotic and benzodiazepine
`Mood stabilizer, antipsychotic and antidepressant
`Mood stabilizer, benzodiazepine and antidepressant
`Antipsychotic, benzodiazepine and antidepressant
`Mood stabilizer, antipsychotic, benzodiazepine and antidepressant
`
`Other psychotropic combinations (not including those listed above)
`No psychotropic therapy
`ECT with or without pharmacologic therapies
`
`9
`8
`1
`1
`
`29
`4
`1
`6
`4
`1
`
`9
`8
`2
`3
`7
`
`5
`2
`1
`
`Treatments recommended by Expert Consensus Guidelines (32) are highlighted in bold for each diagnostic subset.
`a Mood stabilizer includes lithium, valproate, carbamazepine, gabapentin.
`
`168
`
`4 of 9
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1053
`
`

`
`Table 4. Medication treatments for patients diagnosed with bipolar I depression
`
`Prescribing patterns and adherence to bipolar practice guidelines
`
`Percentage
`
`Bipolar I depression with
`psychotic features
`(n=46)
`
`Bipolar I depression without
`psychotic features
`(n=398)
`
`Mono-therapy
`Mood stabilizera alone
`Antipsychotic alone
`Benzodiazepine alone
`Antidepressant alone
`
`Dual-therapy
`Mood stabilizer and antipsychotic
`Mood stabilizer and benzodiazepine
`Mood stabilizer and antidepressant
`Antipsychotic and benzodiazepine
`Antipsychotic and antidepressant
`Benzodiazepine and antidepressant
`
`Poly-therapy
`Mood stabilizer, antipsychotic and benzodiazepine
`Mood stabilizer, antipsychotic and antidepressant
`Mood stabilizer, benzodiazepine and antidepressant
`Antipsychotic, benzodiazepine and antidepressant
`Mood stabilizer, antipsychotic, benzodiazepine and antidepressant
`
`Other psychotropic combinations (not including those listed above)
`No psychotropic therapy
`ECT with or without pharmacologic therapies
`
`0
`7
`0
`13
`
`7
`0
`2
`4
`20
`4
`
`7
`20
`2
`2
`11
`
`0
`2
`2
`
`4
`2
`2
`10
`
`5
`2
`10
`1
`5
`6
`
`3
`14
`11
`3
`8
`
`10
`6
`3
`
`Treatments recommended by Expert Consensus Guidelines (32) are highlighted in bold for each diagnostic subset.
`a Mood stabilizer includes lithium, valproate, carbamazepine, gabapentin.
`
`prescribed no psychotropic agents at discharge was
`2% and 6%, respectively.
`
`Most frequently prescribed agents within medication
`category
`
`Table 5 lists the percentages of bipolar I mania or
`bipolar I depression patients prescribed specific
`medications within each of four medication cate-
`gories (mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, antide-
`pressants, benzodiazepines). For example, of those
`with mania who were prescribed a mood stabilizer
`(n=405), 59% were prescribed valproate and 38%
`were prescribed lithium. For those with either ma-
`nia or depression, valproate and lithium were the
`most frequently prescribed agents. When benzodi-
`azepines were prescribed,
`lorazepam and clon-
`azepam were used most commonly. For patients
`with bipolar I mania, trazodone and sertraline were
`used in approximately equal proportions. For
`those with bipolar I depression, sertraline was used
`most often of the antidepressants. Of the antipsy-
`chotic agents prescribed for bipolar I mania, rispe-
`ridone or conventional agents were used most
`frequently, while for bipolar I depression olanzap-
`ine or conventional agents were prescribed most
`often.
`
`Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)
`
`Of note, a very small percentage of patients with
`bipolar I mania (3%) or bipolar I depression (5%)
`(with or without psychotic features) received elec-
`troconvulsive therapy (ECT), despite its well-docu-
`mented efficacy in the treatment of both phases of
`the disorder (37–39).
`
`Adherence to Expert Consensus Guidelines
`
`Of the patients with bipolar I mania and having
`psychotic features, 38% were prescribed a recom-
`mended pharmacological therapy. More specifi-
`cally, 29% were prescribed a mood stabilizer and
`an antipsychotic, while 9% were prescribed a com-
`bination of a mood stabilizer, an antipsychotic and
`a benzodiazepine (refer again to Table 3). Seven-
`teen percent were discharged on a single mood
`stabilizer or an antipsychotic agent. Of note, about
`a quarter of the patients (26%) in this diagnostic
`subgroup were discharged without
`a mood
`stabilizer.
`Even more strikingly, only 16% of the bipolar I
`mania diagnostic subgroup (without psychotic fea-
`tures) were prescribed a recommended pharmaco-
`logic therapy at discharge (see Table 3) consisting
`
`169
`
`5 of 9
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1053
`
`

`
`Lim et al.
`
`of a mood stabilizer and an antipsychotic (9%),
`mood stabilizer alone (5%), or mood stabilizer and
`benzodiazepine (2%). The high use of antidepres-
`sant agents, alone or in combination, in about half
`of the patients with bipolar I mania (without psy-
`chotic features) was surprising and somewhat per-
`plexing. In addition, two-thirds of the patients
`(66%) were discharged without a mood stabilizer,
`with 11% being discharged on no psychotropic
`agent.
`Turning to bipolar I depression patients with
`psychotic features,
`fewer than one-third (31%)
`were discharged with a recommended pharmaco-
`logic therapy (see Table 4). Of the recommended
`strategies, clinicians preferred the combination of a
`mood stabilizer, an antipsychotic and an antide-
`pressant (20%), versus a) the combination of a
`mood stabilizer and an antipsychotic (7%), b) the
`combination of a mood stabilizer and an antide-
`pressant (2%) or c) ECT (with or without pharma-
`cological agents) (2%). Of note, about half of the
`patients (52%) were discharged on no mood stabi-
`lizer. Virtually all (98%) patients within this diag-
`
`Table 5. Most common psychotropic agents prescribed at discharge for
`bipolar I manic and bipolar I depressed patients by medication category
`
`Percentages
`
`Medicationsa
`
`Bipolar I mania
`(with or without
`psychosis)
`
`Bipolar I depression
`(with or without
`psychosis)
`
`(n=272)
`50
`40
`12
`10
`
`(n=205)
`37
`27
`8
`32
`
`(n=329)
`18
`9
`15
`14
`10
`9
`
`(n=179)
`37
`29
`12
`10
`10
`
`Mood stabilizers
`Valproate
`Lithium
`Gabapentin
`Carbamazepine
`
`(n=405)
`59
`38
`12
`6
`
`(n=442)
`Antipsychotics
`26
`Olanzapine
`37
`Risperidone
`6
`Quetiapine
`Conventional agents 36
`
`Antidepressants
`Sertraline
`Fluoxetine
`Bupropion HCl
`Venlafaxine HCl
`Mirtazapine
`Trazodone
`
`Benzodiazepines
`Lorazepam
`Clonazepam
`Alprazolam
`Bisoprolol
`Hydroxyzine HCl/
`Hydroxyzine
`Pamoate
`
`(n=517)
`21
`13
`9
`9
`7
`22
`
`(n=321)
`37
`31
`12
`10
`9
`
`a Medications are not mutually exclusive.
`
`170
`
`nostic subgroup were treated with a psychotropic
`agent.
`Of the patients with bipolar I depression, without
`psychotic features, only 17% were discharged with
`a recommended pharmacologic therapy (including
`ECT) (see Table 5). The combination of a mood
`stabilizer and an antidepressant was prescribed
`more frequently (10%) than was a mood stabilizer
`alone (4%) or ECT (3%). Although the majority
`(94%) was prescribed a psychotropic agent, 37%
`were discharged without a mood stabilizer.
`
`Discussion
`Bipolar I disorder is among the most challenging
`conditions
`that
`clinicians
`face, with many
`monotherapeutic medication approaches rarely ef-
`fective (40, 41). This research was undertaken to
`describe the primary medication treatment patterns
`for inpatients discharged with a diagnosis of bipo-
`lar I disorder (mania or depression), and to deter-
`mine the extent to which clinicians treating these
`patients are following published treatment guide-
`lines derived from empirical studies and expert
`consensus.
`Because the guidelines are intended to advise
`rather than mandate specific forms of treatment,
`we did not expect clinicians to demonstrate full
`compliance with all recommendations. Nonethe-
`less, we were surprised by the enormously wide
`array of pharmacologic treatments employed that
`often differed substantially from the most current
`set of published medication treatment guidelines
`for bipolar disorder. Only about one out of three
`bipolar I (manic or depressed) patients with psy-
`chotic features was discharged on medications rec-
`ommended as preferred or alternate treatments for
`that disorder. Even more troubling is the finding
`that only one in six patients with bipolar I (mania
`or depression) without psychotic features was dis-
`charged on recommended pharmacologic agents.
`These findings suggest that a substantial number
`of patients with bipolar I disorder were discharged
`from the hospital on treatment regimens that 1)
`did not include medications with demonstrated
`effectiveness for their illness and 2) are not gener-
`ally recommended as preferred or alternate treat-
`ments by current clinical practice and expert
`consensus guidelines. As the findings are taken
`from a national cohort of acute care medical–sur-
`gical facilities with inpatient psychiatric programs
`that treat bipolar patients, one cannot attribute
`these findings to an idiosyncratic pattern of pre-
`scribing at a single location or geographic region.
`Perhaps the most surprising finding was the rela-
`tive high use of antidepressant agents alone or with
`other psychotropic agents. Thirty percent of bipo-
`
`6 of 9
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1053
`
`

`
`Prescribing patterns and adherence to bipolar practice guidelines
`
`lar I mania patients with psychotic features and
`58% of bipolar I mania patients without psy-
`chotic features were prescribed an antidepressant
`at discharge. It has been reported that antidepres-
`sants can induce hypomania, full-blown mania or
`rapid cycling in bipolar patients (42). For that
`reason, none of the published guidelines recom-
`mend use of antidepressants for the manic phase
`of the illness. One set of guidelines (29) even
`states explicitly that if an individual is receiving
`an antidepressant while in a manic, hypomanic or
`mixed state, the antidepressant should be discon-
`tinued. The only exception may be the use of
`trazadone to treat mania-related insomnia. Traza-
`done was,
`indeed, one of the most commonly
`prescribed antidepressants. Other frequently pre-
`scribed antidepressants were the SSRIs
`(most
`commonly sertraline or fluoxetine), as well as
`buproprion and venlafaxine. We had expected
`somewhat higher use of buproprion, since it is
`often prescribed as a first-line treatment for bipo-
`lar depression and according to some authors,
`has a relatively low likelihood of causing a switch
`to mania (32).
`A partial explanation for the high use of an-
`tidepressants among bipolar manic patients may
`be found from a recent study (43), which con-
`cluded that 40% of a sample with a hospital dis-
`charge diagnosis of bipolar disorder had been
`diagnosed with unipolar depression prior to ad-
`mission. What is unknown is why antidepressants
`were continued once the bipolar manic diagnosis
`was made. An alternative explanation is that the
`discharge diagnosis was miscoded in the medical
`record (e.g. bipolar mania was coded when bipo-
`lar depression was the more accurate diagnosis).
`It should also be noted that diagnoses were most
`commonly made by the
`treating psychiatrist
`based on clinical observation, a less
`reliable
`method for assigning a diagnosis than is use of a
`more structured diagnostic interview.
`Not surprisingly for a hospitalized cohort, an-
`tipsychotic agents were commonly used both for
`bipolar I patients with psychotic features (74%
`manic; 78% depressed) as well as for those with-
`out psychotic features
`(33% manic; 41% de-
`pressed). Of
`those receiving an antipsychotic
`agent, about
`two-thirds were receiving second-
`generation agents, most commonly olanzapine or
`risperidone, with the other third prescribed a con-
`ventional
`antipsychotic
`agent.
`It
`should be
`pointed out that one limitation of the 2000 Ex-
`pert Consenus Guidelines is that they confine the
`role of antipsychotic agents to adjunctive treat-
`ment of bipolar disorder. This fails to take into
`account the relatively recent approval of olanzap-
`
`ine as a first-line monotherapeutic treatment for
`acute mania. This
`development
`should
`be
`reflected in future revisions to published treat-
`ment guidelines.
`We also found that a third or more of patients
`with bipolar I depression were prescribed a benzo-
`diazepine. Although benzodiazepines such as lo-
`razepam and clonazepam can play an important
`role in helping to attenuate the nonspecific symp-
`toms associated with an acute manic episode (e.g.
`insomnia, agitation, hyperactivity and anxiety)
`(40), the risk of abuse of anxiolytic agents among
`individuals prone to high rates of concurrent sub-
`stance use should be monitored closely (44).
`The variety of pharmacologic treatment thera-
`pies prescribed to inpatients with bipolar I disor-
`der suggests that practitioners in the field do not
`yet share the degree of consensus implied by pub-
`lished treatment guidelines. We know from other
`areas of medicine that the mere existence of a
`guideline does not mean that it will be easily or
`readily transferred into actual clinical practice
`(45). There are many barriers that may contribute
`to the relative lack of adherence. Gilbert et al.
`(23) offer such factors as physician reluctance to
`be ‘told’ what to do, the lack of necessary train-
`ing and ongoing consultation required, the com-
`plexity and sophistication of some guidelines, the
`perception of additional work required to use
`guidelines, the perceived ‘static’ nature of guide-
`lines and the failure of many patients to adhere
`to guideline-directed treatment. Moreover, a re-
`cent study suggests that about one in six psychia-
`trists was unaware that APA practice guidelines
`for specific psychiatric conditions even existed,
`and almost half had not read any of the guideli-
`nes specific to bipolar disorder (46).
`The degree to which the findings regarding
`medication prescribing patterns
`for
`inpatients
`with bipolar I disorder generalize to less restric-
`tive environments, such as the outpatient setting,
`is unknown. Future research is also needed to
`understand the extent to which adherence to pub-
`lished practice guidelines in psychiatry actually
`improves patient outcomes (47) in the treatment
`of this complex, challenging and often devastat-
`ing disorder.
`
`Acknowledgements
`The assistance of Yoav Gershon, MD, and John S
`Kennedy, MD, in providing valuable comments is grate-
`fully acknowledged. Portions of this work were presented
`at the American Psychiatric Association in Washington,
`DC (May 1999), the Third International Conference on
`Bipolar Disorder in Pittsburgh, PA (June 1999) and the
`Association for Health Services Research in Chicago, IL
`(June 1999).
`
`171
`
`7 of 9
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1053
`
`

`
`Lim et al.
`
`References
`
`1. National Institutes of Mental Health. Mental Health: A
`Report of the Surgeon General – Executive Summary.
`Rockville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services,
`1999; 47–48.
`2. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV: Diagnostic
`and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington,
`DC, 1994.
`3. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S et al. Lifetime and
`12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders
`in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51: 8–19.
`4. Regier DA, Narrow WE, Rae DS et al. The de facto US
`mental and addictive disorders service system. Epidemio-
`logic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of
`disorders and services. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50 (2):
`85–94.
`5. Weissman MM, Bland RC, Canino GJ et al. Cross-na-
`tional epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disor-
`der. JAMA 1996; 276 (4): 293–299.
`6. Woods SW. The economic burden of bipolar disease. J
`Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61 (Suppl 13): 38–41.
`7. Gelenberg AJ, Hopkins HS. Report on efficacy of treat-
`ments for bipolar disorder. Psychopharmacol Bull 1993; 29
`(4): 447–456.
`8. American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for
`the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder. Am J
`Psychiatry 1994; 141 (12 Suppl): 1–36.
`9. Goodwin F, Jamison K. Manic-Depressive Illness. New
`York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
`10. Coryell W, Scheftner W, Keller M et al. The enduring
`psychosocial consequences of mania and depression. Am J
`Psychiatry 1993; 150 (5): 720–727.
`11. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. In: The Global Burden of Dis-
`ease. World Health Organization. Cambridge, MA: Har-
`vard University Press, 1996.
`12. Keck, Jr. PE, McElroy SL, Stanton SP, Bennett JA. Phar-
`macoeconomic aspects of the treatment of bipolar disor-
`der. Psychiatric Ann 1996; 27 (Suppl 7): S449–S453.
`13. Wyatt RJ, Henter I. An economic evaluation of manic-de-
`pressive illness – 1991. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epi-
`demiol 1995; 30 (5): 213–219.
`14. Simon GE, Unutzer J. Health care utilization and costs
`among patients treated for bipolar disorder in an insured
`population. Psychiatric Services 1999; 50 (10): 1303–1308.
`15. Brady KT. Difficulties in diagnosis and management of
`bipolar disorder: three case presentations. J Clin Psychi-
`atry 2000; 61 (Suppl 13): 32–37.
`16. Greenhouse WJ, Meyer B, Johnson SL. Coping and medi-
`cation adherence in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disorders
`2000; 59 (3): 237–241.
`17. Jamison KR, Gerner RH, Goodwin FK. Patient and
`physician attitudes toward lithium: relationship to compli-
`ance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979; 36 (8 Spec No): 866–869.
`18. Weiss RD, Greenfield SF, Najavits LM et al. Medication
`compliance among patients with bipolar disorder and sub-
`stance use disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 (4): 172–
`174.
`19. Hopkins HS, Gelenberg AJ. Treatment of bipolar disor-
`der: how far have we come? Psychopharmacol Bull 1994;
`30 (1): 27–38.
`20. Prien RF, Gelenberg AJ. Alternatives to lithium for pre-
`ventive treatment of bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry
`1989; 146 (7): 840–848.
`21. Gelenberg AJ, Kane JM, Keller MB et al. Comparison of
`standard and low serum levels of lithium for maintenance
`
`172
`
`treatment of bipolar disorder. New Engl J Med 1989; 321
`(22): 1489–1493.
`22. Goldberg JF, Harrow M, Grossman LS. Course and out-
`come in bipolar affective disorder: a longitudinal

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket