throbber
Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on August 13, 2016
`
`0090-9556/97/2505-0573–583$02.00/0
`DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
`Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
`
`Vol. 25, No. 5
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`DISPOSITION AND METABOLISM OF OLANZAPINE IN MICE, DOGS, AND
`RHESUS MONKEYS
`
`EDWARD MATTIUZ, RONALD FRANKLIN, TODD GILLESPIE, ANTHONY MURPHY, JOHN BERNSTEIN, ANDRE CHIU,
`TERRY HOTTEN, AND KELEM KASSAHUN
`
`Department of Drug Metabolism (E.M, R.F, T.G, A.M, J.B, A.C, K.K), Eli Lilly and Company,
`Lilly Corporate Center, and Lilly Research Centre (T.H)
`
`(Received September 12, 1996; accepted January 30, 1997)
`
`ABSTRACT:
`
`Olanzapine (OLZ) is a novel antipsychotic agent with a high affinity
`for serotonin (5-HT2), dopamine (D1/D2/D4), muscarinic (m1–m5),
`adrenergic (␣1), and histamine (H1) receptors. The pharmacokinet-
`ics, excretion, and metabolism of OLZ were studied in CD-1 mice,
`beagle dogs, and rhesus monkeys after a single oral and/or intra-
`venous dose of [14C]OLZ. After oral administration, OLZ was well
`absorbed in dogs (absolute bioavailability of 73%) and to the extent
`of at least 55% in monkeys and 32% in mice. The terminal elimi-
`nation half-life of OLZ was relatively short in mice and monkeys
`(⬃3 hr) and long in dogs (⬃9 hr). In mice and dogs, radioactivity
`was predominantly eliminated in feces; but, in monkeys, the major
`route of elimination of radioactivity was urine. Dogs and monkeys
`excreted in urine, respectively, 38% and 55% of the dose over a
`168-hr period, whereas the fraction of the dose excreted in urine of
`mice over the collection period (120 hr) was 32%. OLZ was subject
`to substantial first-pass metabolism; at the tmax, OLZ accounted
`for 19%, 18%, and 8% of the radioactivity, in mice, dogs, and
`monkeys, respectively. The ratio of AUC OLZ to AUC radioactivity
`was, respectively, 10%, 14%, and 4% in mice, dogs, and monkeys.
`The principal urinary metabolites in mice were 7-hydroxy OLZ
`
`glucuronide, 2-hydroxymethyl OLZ, and 2-carboxy OLZ accounting
`for ⬃10%, 4%, and 2% of the dose. Metabolites that were present
`in urine in lesser amounts were 7-hydroxy OLZ, N-desmethyl OLZ,
`and N-desmethyl-2-hydroxymethyl OLZ. In dogs, the major metab-
`olite accounting for ⬃8% of the dose was 7-hydroxy-N-oxide OLZ.
`Other metabolites identified were 2-hydroxymethyl OLZ, 2-carboxy
`OLZ, N-oxide OLZ, 7-hydroxy OLZ, and its glucuronide and N-
`desmethyl OLZ. The major metabolite in monkey urine was N-des-
`methyl-2-carboxy OLZ, and accounted for ⬃17% of the dose. In
`addition, N-oxide-2-hydroxymethyl OLZ, N-oxide-2-carboxy OLZ,
`N-desmethyl-2-hydroxymethyl, 2-carboxy OLZ, and 2-hydroxy-
`methyl OLZ were identified in monkey urine. Thus, in mice and
`dogs, OLZ was metabolized through aromatic hydroxylation, allylic
`oxidation, N-dealkylation, and N-oxidation reactions. In monkeys,
`OLZ was biotransformed mainly through double oxidation reac-
`tions involving the allylic carbon and methyl piperazine nitrogen.
`Whereas the oxidative metabolic profile of OLZ in animals was
`similar to that of humans, animals were notable for not forming
`appreciable amounts of the principal human metabolite (i.e. 10-N-
`glucuronide OLZ).
`
`was N-glucuronidation. OLZ also underwent oxidative metabolism
`through N-oxidation, N-demethylation, and 2-alkyl hydroxylation.
`This study describes the comparative absorption, pharmacokinetics,
`and metabolism of OLZ in mice, dogs, and monkeys. The studies were
`conducted after the administration of [14C]OLZ.
`
`OLZ1 (fig. 1) is a new antipsychotic drug with a thienobenzodiaz-
`epinyl structure. OLZ displays a broad pharmacological profile with
`potent activity at dopamine (D1/D2/D4), serotonin (5-HT2A/2C), mus-
`carinic (especially m1), histamine (H1) and adrenergic (␣1) receptors
`(1, 2). The receptor binding profile of OLZ is very similar to cloza-
`pine, although OLZ is a more potent inhibitor of these receptors.
`In clinical studies with patients suffering from schizophrenia or
`schizophreniform disorder, OLZ was effective in the treatment of both
`positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, with a low inci-
`dence of extrapyramidal side-effects (3–5). Antipsychotic efficacy of
`OLZ was demonstrated in the dose range of 5–20 mg/day.
`The disposition and metabolism of OLZ after a single oral dose to
`healthy volunteers has recently been reported (6). OLZ was well
`absorbed and extensively metabolized. The primary metabolic route
`
`1 Abbreviations used are: OLZ, olanzapine; LSC, liquid scintillation counting;
`Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; tmax, time to maximum concentration;
`AUC, area under the plasma concentration-time curve; LC-MS/MS, liquid chro-
`matography-tandem mass spectrometry; CID, collision-induced dissociation; IV,
`intravenous.
`
`Send reprint requests to: Dr. Kelem Kassahun, Department of Drug Metab-
`olism, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center,
`Mail Drop 0825, Indianapolis, IN 46285.
`
`Materials and Methods
`Reference Compounds and Other Materials. The following compounds
`were synthesized at Lilly Research Laboratories: OLZ (2-methyl-4-(4-methyl-
`1-piperazinyl)-10H-thieno[2,3-B][1,5]benzodiazepine), [4,10a-14C2]OLZ
`([14C]OLZ; radiochemical purity, 98.7%; specific activity, 26.2 ␮Ci/mg),
`4⬘-N-desmethyl OLZ (N-desmethyl OLZ, 2-methyl-4-(1-piperazinyl)-10H-
`thieno[2,3-B][1,5]benzodiazepine), 4⬘-N-oxide OLZ (N-oxide OLZ, 4-(2-
`methyl-10H-thieno[2,3-B][1,5]benzodiazepin-4-yl)-1-methylpiperazine-1-
`oxide), 2-hydroxymethyl OLZ (4-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-10H-thieno[2,3-
`B][1,5]benzodiazepine-2-methanol), 2-carboxymethyl OLZ (methyl 4-(4-
`methyl-1-piperazinyl)-10H-thieno[2,3-B][1,5]benzodiazepine-2-carboxylate),
`7-ethoxy OLZ (7-ethoxy-2-methyl-4-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-10H-thi-
`eno具2,3-B典具1,5典benzodiazepine), and 4⬘-N-desmethyl-2-hydroxymethyl OLZ
`(4-(1-piperazinyl)-10H-thieno[2,3-B][1,5]benzodiazepine-2-methanol). NEE-
`154 Glusulase was purchased from the DuPont Company (Wilmington, DE).
`␤-Saccharolactone was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
`Scintisol was supplied by Isolab, Inc. (Akron, OH). HPLC-grade ammonium
`acetate, acetonitrile, triethylamine, and reagent-grade boron tribromide were
`purchased from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ). 7-Hydroxy OLZ was pre-
`573
`
`1 of 11
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1033
`
`

`
`574
`
`MATTIUZ ET AL.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on August 13, 2016
`
`Analysis of Radioactivity. Total radioactivity in plasma and urine samples
`was determined using LSC after the addition of scintillation cocktail (Aquas-
`sure; New England Nuclear, Boston, MA). Feces was suspended in 5%
`aqueous sodium lauryl sulfate solution, and aliquots of the dried homogenate
`were combusted in a sample oxidizer. The fecal sample prepared in this
`manner was counted after addition of Aquassure. Mice carcasses were digested
`using alcoholic potassium hydroxide. The homogenate obtained in this manner
`was neutralized with acetic acid, and the radioactivity was determined by LSC.
`Quench correction was conducted by automatic external standardization.
`HPLC Assay of Plasma OLZ. Concentrations of OLZ in mouse, dog, and
`monkey plasma were determined by HPLC (8). In this assay, OLZ and the
`internal standard (2-ethyl homolog of OLZ) are isolated from plasma using a
`mixed-mode, solid-phase extraction, separated with a reversed-phase method,
`and detected electrochemically. The upper and lower limits of quantitation of
`the assay were 100 and 1 ng/ml, respectively.
`Pharmacokinetics. Noncompartmental analysis was used to determine the
`pharmacokinetics of OLZ and radioactivity. Cmax and tmax were assesed by
`visual inspection. The terminal elimination half-life was calculated using the
`relationship 0.693/k, where k is the elimination rate constant. The AUC-–t was
`calculated up to the last time point (t) by the trapezoidal rule.
`In Vitro Protein Binding. [14C]OLZ was dissolved in n-propyl alcohol at
`0.2, 0.02, and 0.002 mg/ml, and an aliquot (15 ␮l) of each concentration was
`added into 2985 ␮l volume control plasma. Plasma samples were then placed
`in a water bath (⬃37°C) for 1 hr. After ultracentrifugation (360,000 g at 37°C
`for 4 hr), the amount of OLZ in the supernatant was determined by LSC. The
`fraction of OLZ bound to protein was calculated from the radioactivity con-
`centrations in the spiked sample and the supernatant.
`Metabolite Isolation. Aliquots of urine samples from each of the orally
`dosed dogs were combined (⬃80 ml total urine) and made basic by the
`addition of 0.1 M ammonium hydroxide (8 ml). Ethyl acetate (300 ml) was
`added, and the phases were mixed by shaking vigorously. The ethyl acetate
`layer was separated and evaporated to dryness in a water bath (40°C) under a
`stream of nitrogen. The aqueous fraction was lyophilized to dryness, dissolved
`in water, and analyzed by HPLC. Pooled mouse urine was also extracted as
`described. For NMR analysis, the 7-hydroxyl-N-oxide metabolite was isolated
`from urine using column chromatography. Approximately 400 g of Amberlite
`XAD-2 resin was packed in a 2.5 ⫻ 30 cm glass column. The remaining urine
`samples from each dog were combined (⬃1.5 liters) and passed through the
`column after preconditioning the column with methanol and purified water.
`The column was washed with water and the radioactivity eluted with methanol.
`Methanolic extracts were concentrated in vacuo at 25°C using a rotary evap-
`orator, and the resulting residue was reconstituted in 70 ml methanol/water
`(1:1) for HPLC analysis. Aliquots (50 ml; 0–24 hr) of urine sample from each
`monkey were lyophilized to ⬃2 ml. The residue was reconstituted in 5 ml
`water:methanol (4:1, v/v) and separated by HPLC.
`Estimation of the Amount of Metabolites. The amount of each metabolite
`in urine was estimated by LSC after isolation by HPLC. An aliquot of the ethyl
`acetate or aqueous extract (50–200 ␮l) was injected into HPLC, and each
`metabolite was collected as it eluted the column. Scintisol (15 ml) was added,
`and the amount of radioactivity was determined by LSC. The total radioactivity
`in the sample was determined by injecting an equal aliquot into the HPLC
`injector and collecting the entire sample before it reached the column.
`Hydrolysis of Conjugates. Glucuronide conjugates (⬃2 ␮g) isolated from
`urine were hydrolyzed to the corresponding aglycone by incubating with
`Glusulase (containing 2,070 units of ␤-glucuronidase and 150 units sulfatase)
`at 37°C for up to 20 hr. Incubations were also conducted in the absence of
`Glusulase and in the presence of ␤-saccharolactone (0.0325 M).
`HPLC Separation of Metabolites. The HPLC system consisted of a
`Beckman pump, NEC controller, Waters Wisp autosampler, Applied Biosys-
`tem UV detector, and a Berthold radiodetector with 150 ␮l yittrium solid cell.
`Aliquots (ⱕ200 ␮l) of concentrated urine or extract were analyzed on a
`Hypersil C18 column (5 ␮m particle size, 0.46 ⫻ 25 cm) using a gradient
`containing A (0.1 M ammonium acetate) and B (1% triethylamine in acetoni-
`trile). The initial solvent composition was 90% A and 10% B. After 2 min, the
`pump was programmed to increase solvent B by 2.5%/min until a proportion
`of 40% A and 60% B was achieved. The mobile phase was maintained for 8
`min at that composition. The flow rate was 1 ml/min. Metabolites were isolated
`
`14C atoms is indicated
`
`FIG. 1.Chemical structure of OLZ; the position of
`by bullet points.
`pared by deethylation of 7-ethoxy OLZ, and 2-carboxyl OLZ was prepared by
`hydrolysis of 2-carboxymethyl OLZ. Approximately 2 mg of each starting
`material was placed in separate siliconized tubes and dissolved in methylene
`chloride (2 ml). The solution was flushed with nitrogen and treated with boron
`tribromide solution (2 ml of 25% solution in methylene chloride). The reaction
`was allowed to proceed at room temperature for 2 hr. Approximately 90% of
`7-ethoxy OLZ was converted to 7-hydroxy OLZ, whereas ⬃50% of 2-car-
`boxymethyl was converted to the corresponding acid as determined by HPLC
`and electrospray LC/MS. N-Desmethyl-2-carboxy OLZ was prepared by oxi-
`dizing the corresponding hydroxy compound using chromium trioxide (7).
`Animal Experiments. All animal experiments were conducted according to
`protocols approved by the Eli Lilly Animal Care and Use Committee. The
`dosing solution used for all animal studies was prepared by dissolving the
`required amounts of OLZ and [14C]OLZ in 1 M HCl and titrating the solution
`to approximately pH 6 by the addition of 0.1 M NaOH. The appropriate
`volume was then obtained by the subsequent addition of water.
`Mouse. Male CD-1 mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories
`(Wilmington, MA) and acclimatized for 3 days before use. Food and water
`were supplied ad libitum at all times throughout the experiment. For radiola-
`beled excretion study, the mice were divided into three groups, with each
`group containing five mice. Each animal was administered a single oral
`(gavage) dose of OLZ (15 mg/kg containing 420 ␮Ci/kg of [14C]OLZ). Urine
`and fecal samples were collected at 24-hr intervals for up to 120 hr. For
`pharmacokinetic study, four mice were used for each time point and dosed as
`described. Blood was collected and pooled from four mice at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7, 12,
`24, 48, and 72 hr after the dose. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation and
`stored at ⫺70°C until analysis. Metabolite identification was conducted in
`urine obtained from mice given a 20 mg/kg dose. Urine samples collected for
`24-hr postdose from eight mice were combined and stored at ⫺70°C until
`analyzed. Additional mice (10) were administered a single oral dose (15 mg/kg) of
`OLZ, and plasma was collected at ⬃1 hr for metabolite identification.
`Dog. Four female beagle dogs (age: 2–4 years; weight: 8.7–13.1 kg) were
`obtained from stock animals maintained at Lilly Research Laboratories and
`placed in individual stainless-steel metabolism cages. Animals were fasted
`overnight before and 2 hr after drug administration. Animals were given a
`single oral (gavage) dose of OLZ (5 mg/kg containing 4 ␮Ci/kg of [14C]OLZ).
`Urine and fecal samples were collected every 24 hr for 168 hr. Blood was
`drawn at 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, and 168 hr after dosing. Aliquots were
`withdrawn for determination of radioactivity, and the remainder was centri-
`fuged to obtain plasma. Plasma was also obtained from three female dogs
`given a single intravenous dose of OLZ (5 mg/kg containing 5 ␮Ci/kg
`[14C]OLZ) at 0, 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and
`168 hr postdose. For identification of plasma metabolites, another group of
`three dogs were dosed orally with OLZ (5 mg/kg), and plasma was collected
`at 3 and 12 hr after the dose.
`Monkey. Young adult rhesus monkeys (2 males and 2 females) weighing
`between 3 and 7 kg were used in the study. Each animal was given a single oral
`(nasogastric) dose of OLZ (5 mg/kg containing 8.9 ␮Ci/kg [14C]OLZ). Blood
`was collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 96, 120, and 168 hr postdose,
`whereas urine and fecal samples were collected every 24 hr up to 168 hr.
`
`2 of 11
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1033
`
`

`
`METABOLISM OF OLANZAPINE IN MICE, DOGS, AND MONKEYS
`
`575
`
`TABLE 1
`Urinary and fecal elimination of radioactivity in mice, dogs, and monkeys after the administration of a single oral dose of [14C]OLZ
`% Dose Excreted
`Dogc
`
`Monkeyd
`
`Time
`
`Mousea,b
`
`Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on August 13, 2016
`
`hr
`0–24
`24–48
`48–120
`120–168
`
`Total
`
`Urine
`
`Feces
`
`Urine
`
`Feces
`
`Urine
`
`Feces
`
`25.0 ⫾ 1.8
`4.0 ⫾ 1.1
`2.9 ⫾ 2.2
`NCe
`
`31.9 ⫾ 2.8
`
`46.7 ⫾ 2.9
`11.6 ⫾ 3.0
`6.0 ⫾ 2.3
`NC
`
`64.3 ⫾ 3.4
`
`20.5 ⫾ 3.7
`11.7 ⫾ 5.1
`5.6 ⫾ 1.0
`0.60 ⫾ 0.13
`
`2.7 ⫾ 2.9
`22.9 ⫾ 13.0
`19.0 ⫾ 9.0
`1.1 ⫾ 0.27
`
`47.6 ⫾ 3.6
`4.8 ⫾ 0.70
`2.0 ⫾ 0.70
`0.23 ⫾ 0.08
`
`6.2 ⫾ 8.7
`14.0 ⫾ 3.4
`8.0 ⫾ 5.8
`0.31 ⫾ 0.10
`
`38.4 ⫾ 2.6
`
`45.6 ⫾ 5.4
`
`54.6 ⫾ 3.7
`
`28.5 ⫾ 5.2
`
`97.4 ⫾ 1.1f
`
`Grand total
`Data represent mean ⫾ SD.
`a N ⫽ 3.
`b % dose recovered from the carcass was 0.6%.
`c N ⫽ 4.
`d N ⫽ 4.
`e NC, not collected.
`f Includes radioactivity from cage washings and carcass.
`g Includes cage washings.
`
`84.3 ⫾ 5.0g
`
`83.1 ⫾ 3.9
`
`by collecting the radioactive eluent as it eluted off the column. Several
`injections were made to obtain a sufficient amount of each metabolite for mass
`spectral identification.
`LC-MS/MS. Isolated metabolites were analyzed by LC/MS and LC-
`MS/MS on a Finnigan MAT TSQ700. Metabolites were introduced into the
`electrospray LC interface using a Waters Model 600 pump. Metabolites were
`separated on an Inertsil C18 column (5 ␮m particle size, 0.46 ⫻ 25 cm) using
`the same gradient as described with 0.05 M ammonium acetate and acetoni-
`trile. Injection volumes ranged from 10 to 200 ␮l. The flow rate was 1 ml/min,
`and the effluent was split such that equal volumes were delivered into the ion
`source and a Raytest Ramona model 5LS radiodetector. MS spectra were
`obtained by scanning from m/z 200 to 600 every second. For CID experiments,
`the collision gas (argon) pressure was maintained at 2.0 m torr, and the
`collision offset voltage was ⫺20 eV. MS and MS/MS spectra were averaged
`for 1 min.
`NMR Spectroscopy. Proton and carbon-13 NMR spectra were recorded in
`d6-DMSO or CDCI3 on a Bruker AMX spectrometer operating at 500 MHz.
`Chemical shifts are reported in ppm relative to tetramethylsilane.
`
`Results
`Excretion of Radioactivity. Mice administered a single oral dose
`(15 mg/kg) of OLZ eliminated 64.3 ⫾ 3.4% (mean ⫾ SD) and 31.9 ⫾
`2.8% of the radioactivity, respectively, in feces and urine over a
`120-hr period (table 1). The majority of the dose (⬎87%) was ex-
`creted during the first 48 hr of dosing. Less than 1% of the adminis-
`tered dose was recovered in the carcasses.
`In dogs, ⬃84% of the radioactivity was recovered after 168 hr, with
`slightly more radioactivity eliminated in the feces (45.6 ⫾ 5.4%) than
`in the urine (38.4 ⫾ 2.6%). Greater than 50% of the dose was
`recovered within 48 of dosing (table 1).
`In monkeys, renal excretion was the primary mode of radiocarbon
`elimination accounting for 54.6 ⫾ 3.7% of the dose. Another 28.5 ⫾
`5.2% of the dose was eliminated via the feces over the same period.
`Greater than 50% of the dose was eliminated in the urine and feces 24
`hr after the dose (table 1). There was no difference between males and
`females with respect to the amount of radioactivity in either the urine
`or feces.
`Pharmacokinetics. Mice. Pharmacokinetic parameters of OLZ and
`radioactivity in mice are shown in table 2. OLZ was quantitated in
`plasma using an HPLC assay with a lower limit of quantitation of 1
`
`ng/ml. The Cmax of OLZ was 421 ng/ml and occurred at 0.5 hr after
`the dose. The corresponding value for radioactivity was 2,260 ng-
`eq/ml and was reached at a much later time (4 hr). At 0.5 hr, OLZ
`accounted for ⬃19% of plasma radioactivity. This is indicative of the
`extensive metabolism of OLZ in the mouse. Similarly, OLZ ac-
`counted for 10% of the total 14C AUC. The plasma terminal half-life
`of OLZ was 3.2 hr. Radioactivity in plasma declined slowly with a
`half-life of 10.6 hr. The plasma radioactivity vs. time curve (fig. 2)
`showed elevated concentrations at both 0.5 and 4 hr, suggesting
`enterohepatic recycling.
`Dogs. The mean Cmax of OLZ was 172 ⫾ 69 ng/ml and occurred
`between 1 and 3 hr in 3 of the 4 animals tested. The fourth animal had
`a tmax of 6 hr. The elimination of OLZ from plasma seemed to be
`biphasic (fig. 3), with the terminal phase displaying a half-life of
`9.2 ⫾ 1.4 hr.
`The mean tmax for radioactivity in plasma was 1 ⫾ 0.0 hr, and the
`Cmax was 949 ⫾ 296 ng-eq/ml. Plasma radioactivity declined with a
`mean half-life of 27.6 ⫾ 12.0 hr. The ratio of AUC OLZ to AUC
`radioactivity was 0.14.
`After a single IV dose of OLZ to three dogs, the mean Cmax and
`AUC for OLZ were, respectively, 871 ⫾ 241 ng/ml and 2,633 ⫾
`1,041 ng * hr/ml. The corresponding values for plasma radioactivity
`were 1,145 ⫾ 195 ng-eq/ml and 18,813 ⫾ 2,598 ng-eq * hr/ml. Thus,
`after an IV administration, at the tmax OLZ accounted for 76% of the
`radioactivity, compared with a value of 18% after an oral dose.
`Because the amount of radioactivity excreted in urine after the oral
`and IV doses was almost the same (38.4% and 39.7% of the dose), the
`decreased bioavailability after oral administration is likely due to
`first-pass metabolism. The ratio of AUC OLZ to 14C AUC was the
`same as that obtained after oral dosing. The absolute oral bioavail-
`ability of OLZ was calculated to be 73%.
`Monkeys. The mean Cmax of OLZ and radioactivity were 60 ⫾ 18
`and 757 ⫾ 169 ng eq/ml, and were reached on average within 1.5 hr
`postdose. Therefore, at the Cmax OLZ accounted for ⬃8% of the
`plasma radioactivity. On the basis of AUC, the fraction of plasma
`radioactivity represented by OLZ was ⬃4%.
`The mean elimination half-life of OLZ was 3.4 ⫾ 1.2 hr. The
`
`3 of 11
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1033
`
`

`
`576
`
`MATTIUZ ET AL.
`
`TABLE 2
`Mean pharmacokinetic parameters of OLZ and radioactivity in mice, dogs and monkeys after the administration of a single oral dose of [14C]OLZ
`Mousea
`Parameter
`Dog
`Monkey
`Dose (mg/kg)
`5
`5
`Cmax (ng or ng-eq/ml)
`OLZ
`14C
`OLZ as % of 14C
`tmax (hr)
`OLZ
`14C
`t1/2 (hr)
`OLZ
`14C
`AUC (ng or ng-eq 䡠 hr/ml)
`1,923 ⫾ 325
`OLZ
`13,405 ⫾ 2,123
`14C
`14%
`10%
`OLZ as % of total 14C
`a Mouse data obtained from pooled plasma, for dogs and monkeys values represent mean ⫾ SD (N ⫽ 4).
`b Points used in the determination of the respective half-lives.
`
`15
`
`421
`2,260
`
`19%
`
`0.5
`4
`
`3.2 (7–12 hr)b
`10.6 (7–48 hr)b
`
`1,522
`15,201
`
`172 ⫾ 69
`949 ⫾ 296
`18%
`
`3.3 ⫾ 2.1
`1 ⫾ 0.0
`
`9.2 ⫾ 1.4 (3–48 hr)b
`27.6 ⫾ 12.0 (24–96 hr)b
`
`60 ⫾ 18
`757 ⫾ 169
`8%
`
`1 ⫾ 0.0
`1.5 ⫾ 1.7
`
`3.4 ⫾ 1.2 (1–12 hr)
`5.3 ⫾ 0.7 (4–12 hr)
`
`536.6 ⫾ 208.3
`14,429 ⫾ 1,572
`4%
`
`Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on August 13, 2016
`
`FIG. 2.Plasma concentration vs. time profiles for OLZ and total
`radioactivity in mice given an oral dose of 15 mg/kg of [14C]OLZ.
`Radioactivity is expressed as mean ⫾ SD (N ⫽ 4), whereas OLZ concen-
`trations were obtained from pooled plasma.
`
`elimination of radioactivity from plasma was biphasic (fig. 4), with
`the initial and terminal phases having half-lives of, respectively, 5.3 ⫾
`0.7 and 98.7 ⫾ 26.5 hr.
`In Vitro Plasma Protein Binding. The plasma protein binding of
`OLZ was similar in the three species studied, with mean binding being
`77%, 75%, and 83% in mice, dogs, and monkeys, respectively. The
`binding was concentration-independent (10–1,000 ng/ml). The extent
`of protein binding was lower in these species than that reported for
`humans at 93% (6).
`Metabolism. Mice. Upon partitioning pooled urine (0–24 hr) be-
`tween ethyl acetate and water, 19% of the radioactivity was extracted
`into the ethyl acetate, whereas 76% remained in the aqueous fraction.
`An aliquot of the aqueous fraction was separated by HPLC with
`radiochemical detection and yielded the chromatogram in fig. 5. The
`corresponding HPLC chromatogram from the ethyl acetate extract is
`shown in fig. 6. The individual peaks were collected and analyzed by
`direct infusion electrospray MS and MS/MS. The following metabo-
`lites were identified in urine of mice by comparing their LC and
`LC-MS/MS properties to those obtained from synthetic standards.
`The metabolite that eluted as peak 1 in fig. 5 was identified as
`
`FIG. 3.Plasma concentration vs. time profiles for OLZ and total
`radioactivity in dogs given an oral dose of 5 mg/kg of [14C]OLZ.
`Data are expressed as mean ⫾ SD (N ⫽ 4).
`
`2-carboxy OLZ on the basis of the similarity of its HPLC retention
`time and product ion spectrum to those obtained from a sample of
`synthetic 2-carboxy OLZ. The positive ion electrospray mass spec-
`trum of the major urinary metabolite (peak 2, fig. 5) exhibited an
`MH⫹ ion at m/z 505, which suggested that the metabolite was the
`glucuronide of a hydroxylated OLZ derivative (Mr OLZ ⫽ 312). The
`product ion spectrum of m/z 505 was dominated by the fragment at
`m/z 329, which is likely due to loss of dehydroglucuronic acid from
`the conjugate. ␤-Glucuronidase hydrolysis of the conjugate resulted in
`7-hydroxy OLZ, confirming the major metabolite in urine as 7-hy-
`droxy OLZ glucuronide. Peaks 3 and 4 were characterized as N-des-
`methyl-2-hydroxymethyl OLZ and 2-hydroxymethyl OLZ, respec-
`tively, by comparison with authentic standards. Six metabolites (fig.
`6) were isolated from the ethyl acetate extract for MS identification.
`2-Hydroxymethyl OLZ, which was also present in the aqueous frac-
`tion, was identified as the component eluting as peak 1 in fig. 6. The
`metabolite that eluted as peak 2 had the same HPLC retention volume
`and MS/MS fragmentation as authentic 7-hydroxy OLZ. The metab-
`olite shown as peak 3 (fig. 6) was identified as N-desmethyl OLZ.
`Unchanged OLZ was also excreted in urine (peak 4, fig. 6). The
`identities of the other radiolabeled components in fig. 6 were not
`
`4 of 11
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1033
`
`

`
`METABOLISM OF OLANZAPINE IN MICE, DOGS, AND MONKEYS
`
`577
`
`Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on August 13, 2016
`
`Six metabolites of OLZ were identified in the urine of mice in
`addition to the parent compound. Based on the percentage of the
`radioactivity that was extracted into the ethyl acetate (19%) and the
`percentage remaining in the aqueous fraction (76%), the amount of
`urinary radioactivity accounted for by each metabolite was estimated
`as shown in table 3.
`Dogs. Pooled urine sample from the first 48 hr after dosing was
`used for metabolite identification. The partitioning of radioactivity
`between ethyl acetate and water was similar to that obtained for
`mouse urine with 15% extracted into ethyl acetate and 79% of the
`radioactivity remaining in the aqueous fraction. The HPLC separation
`of the radioactive components in the ethyl acetate and aqueous frac-
`tions is shown, respectively, in figs. 7 and 8. In the ethyl acetate
`extract, 2-hydroxymethyl OLZ, N-oxide OLZ, 7-hydroxy OLZ, N-
`desmethyl OLZ (peaks 1–4; fig. 7) were identified in addition to the
`parent compound.
`The major component in the aqueous fraction (peak 3, fig. 8) had a
`retention time that was different from the available standards. The
`electrospray MS of this metabolite gave an apparent protonated mo-
`lecular ion of m/z 345. MS/MS experiments indicated that the metab-
`olite was an N-oxygenated species with a hydroxyl group on the
`benzodiazepine moiety. Approximately 30 mg of the metabolite was
`isolated from urine using XAD-2 chromatography and further purified
`by HPLC fractionation. The 1H- and 13C-NMR data obtained for the
`metabolite are shown in table 4. The 1H-NMR of the metabolite
`showed a downfield shift of the 4⬘-CH3 to ␦3.08 (␦2.21 for OLZ) and
`was identical to the value obtained for N-oxide OLZ. Similarly, the
`13C-NMR exhibited a downfield shift of the 4⬘-CH3 resonance to ␦
`58.09 (␦ 45.73 for OLZ). Two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser en-
`hancement was used to confirm the exact position of the hydroxyl
`group on the benzene ring of OLZ. The absence of a C-7 proton (␦
`6.83 for OLZ) and the fact that the C-9 proton showed ortho coupling
`only (J ⫽ 8 Hz) indicated the hydroxyl group was at the C-7 position.
`Thus, on the basis of combined MS and NMR data, the major urinary
`metabolite in dogs was identified as 7-hydroxy-N-oxide OLZ.
`
`FIG. 4.Plasma concentration vs. time profiles for OLZ and total
`radioactivity in monkeys given an oral dose of 5 mg/kg of [14C]OLZ.
`Data are expressed as mean ⫾ SD (N ⫽ 4).
`
`confirmed, although MS/MS fragmentation indicated that they were
`OLZ metabolites. The peak eluting between peaks 2 and 3 had an
`apparent MH⫹ ion of m/z 327, 2 Da less than that of 2-hydroxymethyl
`OLZ. This metabolite could possibly be the precursor of 2-carboxy
`OLZ, the 2-formyl derivative of OLZ.
`In plasma, in addition to the parent compound, 2-hydroxymethyl
`OLZ, N-desmethyl OLZ and the glucuronide of a hydroxy OLZ
`metabolite were detected. Also, mass spectral data was obtained that
`indicated the presence of two isomeric glutathione conjugates of OLZ.
`The conjugates exhibited an MH⫹ ion at m/z 618, which upon CID
`fragmentation, gave MH-129⫹—a characteristic loss of glutathione
`conjugates (9), in addition to other fragments consistent with the
`glutathione conjugate of OLZ. The MS/MS data also suggested that
`the glutathione moiety was attached to one of the carbons of the
`benzene ring of OLZ.
`
`FIG. 5.HPLC radiochromatogram obtained from the aqueous fraction of mouse urine.
`1, 2-carboxy OLZ; 2, 7-hydroxy OLZ glucuronide; 3, N-desmethyl-2-hydroxymethyl OLZ; 4, 2-hydroxymethyl OLZ.
`
`5 of 11
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1033
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on August 13, 2016
`
`578
`
`MATTIUZ ET AL.
`
`FIG. 6.HPLC radiochromatogram obtained from the ethyl acetate extract of mouse urine.
`1, 2-hydroxymethyl OLZ; 2, 7-hydroxyl OLZ; 3, N-desmethyl OLZ; 4, OLZ.
`
`The aqueous fraction also contained a metabolite (peak 1, fig. 8)
`that was identified as 2-carboxy OLZ. In addition to 7-hydroxy OLZ
`glucuronide (peak 2, fig. 8), a glucuronide of OLZ was identified
`(peak 4, fig. 8) and characterized as the tertiary N-glucuronide, OLZ
`10-N-glucuronide.
`LC/MS analysis of the XAD-2 extract indicated the presence of
`apparent protonated molecular ions at m/z 432 and 448. The product
`ion spectra of these metabolites indicated that the metabolites might
`be the cysteine adducts of OLZ and N-oxide OLZ. CID analysis of the
`ion at m/z 432 resulted in fragment ions at m/z 345 and 311 that could
`be produced, respectively, from loss of 87 Da as a neutral [CH2AC—
`(NH2)COOH] from the cysteinyl moeity of the conjugate and com-
`plete cleavage of the cysteine residue. The ion at m/z 311 further
`fragmented to an ion at m/z 254. This transition is characteristic of
`OLZ and metabolites (6) and results from loss of 57 Da as
`CH2ACH—NH—CH3 from the methyl piperazine ring of the mole-
`cules. MS/MS analysis (precursor m/z 448) of the putative cysteine
`conjugate of N-oxide OLZ yielded a fragmentation pattern that was
`different from that obtained for the corresponding conjugate of OLZ.
`The fragment at m/z 261 perhaps resulted from the combined loss of
`100 Da (scission of the methyl piperazine ring) and 87 Da [CH2AC—
`(NH2)COOH, from the cysteine residue]. The additional loss of pos-
`sibly hydrogen sulfide resulted in a fragment at m/z 228. A weak ion
`at m/z 401 resulted from the loss of 47 Da from the methyl piperazine
`portion of the molecule that is a characteristic fragmentation pathway
`of N-oxide OLZ (6).
`After 3 hr postdose, plasma contained OLZ, 2-hydroxymethyl,
`N-oxide, N-desmethyl, and the 7-hydroxy metabolites, as well as the
`glucuronide of 7-hydroxy OLZ. After 12 hr, the plasma metabolite
`profile was similar to that obtained at 3 hr, except that the level of
`N-oxide was lower than that of the 7-hydroxy metabolite and no
`7-hydroxy glucuronide was detected.
`The relative amount of each metabolite and parent drug in urine
`was estimated by HPLC with radiochemical detection as detailed in
`the Materials and Methods and is presented in table 3. The amount of
`7-hydroxy OLZ was estimated from the ethyl acetate extract. The
`ethyl acetate extract contained 7-hydroxy OLZ; however, this metab-
`olite was not detectable in the XAD-2 extract. The 7-hydroxy metab-
`
`Compound
`
`TABLE 3
`Estimated amounts of OLZ and its metabolites in urine
`% Urinary Radioactivity
`Mouse
`Dog
`Monkey
`1.1a
`NDb
`39.6
`NDb
`1.1
`3.3
`NDb
`ND
`20.9
`1.7
`ND
`8.2
`ND
`ND
`36.0
`
`7-Hydroxy glucuronide
`7-Hydroxy
`7-Hydroxy-N-oxide
`N-desmethyl-2-hydroxymethyl
`N-desmethyl-2-desmethyl-2-
`carboxy
`2-Hydroxymethyl
`2-Hydroxymethyl glucuronide
`2-Carboxy
`N-oxide
`N-oxide-2-hydroxymethyl
`N-oxide-2-carboxy
`N-desmethyl
`CYSe conjugate
`CYS conjugate of N-oxide
`NACf conjugate
`Olanzapine
`
`14.9
`ND
`6.6
`ND
`ND
`ND
`1.6
`ND
`ND
`ND
`3.6
`
`9.3
`ND
`8.0d
`3.4
`ND
`ND
`0.3
`5.1
`2.3
`ND
`6.1
`
`6.4
`1.7c
`7.0
`NDb
`11.5
`9.0
`NDb
`NDb
`NDb
`2.8
`NDb
`
`82.6
`59.7
`69.1
`Total
`a 7-Hydroxy glucuronide coeluted with the cysteine conjugate of OLZ under
`the HPLC conditions used. An estimate for these metabolites was obtained
`using ms and comparing the ion intensities at m/z 432 and 505.
`b ND, not detected.
`c 2-Hydroxymethyl glucuronide coeluted with 2-carboxy. The level of each
`metabolite was estimated by ms on the basis of ion intensities at m/z 343 and
`505.
`d 2-Carboxy coeluted with the cysteine conjugate of N-oxide. The relative
`amount of each metabolite was estimated by ms on the basis of ion intensities
`at m/z 343 and 448.
`e CYS, cysteine.
`f NAC, N-acetylcysteine.
`
`olite is fairly susceptible to air oxidation and could have decomposed
`during the lengthy XAD-2 extraction procedure.
`Monkeys. An aliquot of the first 24-hr urine sample from each
`
`6 of 11
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1033
`
`

`
`METABOLISM OF OLANZAPINE IN MICE, DOGS, AND MONKEYS
`
`579
`
`Downloaded from
`
`dmd.aspetjournals.org
`
` at ASPET Journals on August 13, 2016
`
`FIG. 7.HPLC radiochromatogram obtained from the ethyl acetate extract of dog urine.
`1, 2-

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket