throbber
The Role of
`Novel Antipsychotics
`in Bipolar Disorders
`
`Lakshmi N. Yatham, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.P.C., M.R.C.Psych.
`
`Patients with bipolar disorder frequently receive antipsychotic agents during both the acute
`a‘nd maintenance phases of treatment. Conventional antipsychotics are effective against mania. but
`the}? HI:
`induce depressive symptoms and expose patients with bipolar disorder to increased risks of
`tardi c
`_'.itlt_inesia. Recent studies have shown risperidone to be effective for acute mania, both as
`nionotltfapf
`d in combination with mood stabilizers; this agent has also shown efficacy as add-on
`maintenance 3
`'n open-label studies as it exhibited both antimanic and antidepressant effects.
`Olanzapine,
`novel antipsychotic, is also effective against both manic and depressive symp-
`toms and in the ma
`mace treatment as indicated by an open-label study. Data on other novel agents
`are more limited.
`.
`(J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63[suppI 31:10-14)
`
`.
`
`A ntipsychotic medications have a loIag}31,istdi:y't)fuse
`in bipolar disorders, considerably predtfi]
`«fig gse.
`of lithium. Chlorpromazine. for example, has b ‘
`,usei:l:=far
`control agitation and psychotic symptoms almost sifide its
`introduction in the early 1950s.‘ Increasingly, resear
`'
`focusing on the potential uses of the novel antipsyehotic@
`in bipolar disorders. This article reviews some of the most
`recent results obtained with these agents.
`Studies examining prescription rates have suggested
`that up to 90% of patients with bipolar disorders receive
`antipsychotic medications at some time during the ill-
`ness? A survey at a university teaching hospital, whose
`prevailing philosophy was to discourage the use of un-
`necessary medications, found that 82% of patients with
`mania admitted to a hospital were receiving an antipsy-
`chotic (L.N.Y., unpublished observation, 1999). The most
`common reasons for their use included rapid control of
`
`From the University ofBritish Columbia, Vancouver;
`Canada.
`Based on proceedings ofa special symposium ofthe
`Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments
`(CANMAT), which was held at the 50th annual meeting ofthe
`Canadian Psychiatric Association, October 2000, in Victoria,
`British Columbia. The symposium was supported by an
`unrestricted educational grant from Janssen-Ortho Inc.
`Financial disclosure: Dr. Yatham is a consultant for
`./anssen, Eli Lilly, Glaxosmithlfline, and AstraZeneca and
`receives grant and research support from ./anssen, Eli Lilly,
`and GlaxoSmithKline.
`Reprint requests to: Lakshmi N. Yatham, M.B.B.S.,
`F.‘R.C.P.C., M.R.C.Psych., Division ofMood Disorders, University
`ofBritish Columbia, 2255 WesbrookMalI, Vancouver; BC,
`Canada V6‘T 2.4] (e-mail: yatham@interchange.ubc.ca).
`
`psychotic symptoms, agitation or overactivity, violent
`behavior, and refractoriness to treatment with a mood
`stabilizer alone. Moreover,
`the use of antipsychotic
`medications often extended well beyond the acute treat-
`ment phase into the maintenance phase.’
`’Gi en this high degree of antipsychotic use, which
`anti
`hotic agents are preferable to use in the setting of
`Bipolar §l;1ess? Conventional antipsychotics are effective
`nolzfinly/~lij‘l]1e treatment of the symptoms of acute ma-
`t1ia,“’@but._a1§:65[iay have some usefulness in the preven-
`tion of'#a‘g“,ic eRi‘§.bdes.3'” However, the incidence of tar-
`dive dyskirrésia a"
`;ated with these agents is of concern.
`and there is sofiié eviiifne that the risk of tardive dyskine-
`sia is higher in patients 'wifB,bipolar disorders than in those
`with schizophrenia.” Furtlierm , conventional antipsy-
`chotic medications do not appeal‘-gig help patients with de-
`pressive episodes—in fact, they't@ _even induce depres-
`sion.'° Therefore, conventional antipsyqhotics are unlikely
`to be the optimal choices for treating pfitientsswith bipolar
`disorder who require antipsychotic medicflinn.
`The remainder of this article will review etfie current
`
`evidence for treating bipolar disorder patients ‘with novel
`antipsychotics. Risperidone and olanzapine are the 2
`novel antipsychotics for which the most evidence has ac-
`cumulated.
`
`RISPERIDONE
`
`There are robust double-blind data on the use of ris-
`
`peridone in acute mania. One small 4-week monotherapy
`study“ compared risperidone, 6 mg/day; haloperidol, 10
`mg/day: and lithium, 800 to 1200 mg/day, in 45 patients
`
`10
`
`J Clin Psychiatry 2002:63 (suppl 3)
`
`1of5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1015
`
`1 of 5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Figure 1. Mean Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Change
`Scores With Risperidone, Lithium, or Haloperidol‘
`
`Haloperidol
`(N=15)
`—— .
`’ "'
`E
`‘
`l_
`'
`
`
`
`_
`-14.6-/.
`
`Rispendone
`(N=15)
`0% —
`
`Lithium
`(N=15)
`.
`
`._
`ii 5-».
`a E - -=
`2 9
`o 3 -10%
`as
`2 m
`>. 00
`§ E 45%
`E
`
`1
`
`-20%
`
`'_l
`-
`
`l
`l
`'
`—12.7%
`
`- ‘i 4"
`1.,‘ I
`
`"Data from Segal et al."
`
`W’
`K
`
`.E3.1»
`
`Novel Antipsychotics in Bipolar Disorders
`
`Figure 3. Patients With Improvement on Clinical Global
`lmpcfessions-Improvement (CGI-l) Scale in 2 Double-Blind
`Stu ies“
`El “-3 Very much improved
`°’a Much improved
`
`US Study”
`
`International Study‘:
`
`PatientsWithCGI
`
`
`
`ImprovementsatEndpoint(%)
`
`"Abbreviation: MS = mood stabilizer.
`"U.S. study. Data from Sachs."
`"lntemational study. Data from Yatham.
`*p < .01 risperidone vs. placebo.
`'l'p < .05.
`
`'
`
`v
`
`-'3
`
`cordingly. 2 similarly designed double-blind combina-
`tion studies in acute mania examined the addition of ris-
`
`9
`
`‘$6 ‘,9
`.«
`60
`0
`Q“
`
`Q
`..
`\3
`00
`X
`(b
`o
`Q0‘
`°é.°
`15”
`<2"-“’
`<2"’
`
`4..51,.t,O
`
`I=1
`
`z
`
`-14
`
`-16"
`
`'N=5o
`
`1-
`
`N=54
`
`Figure 2. Young Mania Rating Scale ( ange Scores
`1‘ i_’lacebo or
`From Baseline to Endpoint With Risperigl
`Haloperidol Add-On to Mood Stabilizers i;IL2 Flgubli,-,l3lind
`Studies“
`a-4%
`, c 1?
`f5’
`$25.
`6-
`0
`.4'“_.r
`~
`s .r g
`_.-
`,‘
`06
`,‘
`J." Q .
`-
`.90 QP
`(6
`.90
`0‘
`dz.
`g....' 0.’
`dz.
`-’ peridone or placebo to a mood stabilizer.'2*"‘ One study
`Q‘-"3
`9"” Q53 " ' -
`9""
`'
`R
`"was an international trial” that enrolled 150 patients and
`iifiludgd lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine as the
`finioatlkdtabilizers. The other was a U.S. trial” that in-
`’<e},ude.;rai__
`_
`additional haloperidol treatment arm, but in
`ihitgfstudy ia‘itl_y lithium or valproate were permitted as
`moo
`Both studies were double blind and
`were ogl°)§ee‘lQ‘_',‘d_uration followed by a 10-week open-
`label extensigq péiidé In the U.S. study, both risperidone
`and haloperi 6l’fedLhz€dYMRS scores by approximately
`6 points compared witfipll ‘ bo; this difference was both
`statistically and clinicallfig ‘ "cant (Figure 2). In the
`international study,” initial aria
`is of data showed a dif-
`ference of about 4.5 points on
`scores between the
`risperidone plus mood stabilizer artcifilacebo plus mood
`stabilizer groups, which was clinically butsnot statisti-
`cally significant. However, patients in thifsntfiy who re-
`ceived both risperidone and carbamazepine lfqtfinean se-
`rum risperidone concentrations 1.7 times lower than
`those who received risperidone with valproic acid or lith-
`ium. The lower serum concentrations were most likely
`caused by the induction of risperidone metabolism by
`carbamazepine. Exclusion of the patients taking carba-
`mazepine yielded a statistically significant difference
`(p < .05; Figure 2) between the 2 groups. Moreover, in
`both studies, the proportion of patients who were “much
`improved" or “very much improved” was significantly
`greater in the risperidone group than in the placebo group
`(Figure 3). In addition, the improvement in the risperi-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MeanYMRSChangeScores
`
`"Abbreviation: MS = mood stabilizer.
`"US. study. Data from Sachs."
`‘International study. Data from Yatham."
`“lntemational revised sample excluding carbamazepine.
`*p < .01.
`ip = .089.
`;1;p < .047.
`
`with acute mania.-Risperidone was found to be as effec-
`tive as the other 2 agents—the mean Young Mania Rating
`Scale (YMRS) scores decreased by 16.2 points for the ris-
`peridone group, 14.6 points for the haloperidol group, and
`12.7 points for the lithium group (Figure 1).
`This study was suggestive of the efficacy of risperi-
`done monotherapy in acute mania. However. in clinical
`practice, the combination of an antipsychotic medication
`with a mood-stabilizing agent is far more common. Ac-
`
`] Clin Psychiatry 2002;63 lsuppl 3)
`
`ll
`
`2of5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1015
`
`2 of 5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Lakshmi N. Yatham
`
`Figure 4. Scores of 541 Bipolar Patients According to Subtype
`Treated With Add-On Risperidone in an Open-Label Study“
`
`Figure 5. Olanzapine Versus Placebo in Acute Mania‘
`
`I Mania
`0 Schtzoaffecttve disorder
`
`A Bipolar ll
`0 Mixed
`D Depression
`
`Mean
`Baseline Score:
`0
`-2
`
`"‘
`
`-4
`
`Study 1”
`3 Weeks
`28 7
`27.7
`
`Study 2°
`4 Weeks
`28 8
`29 4
`
`A. Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
`30
`
`25
`
`M0
`
`on85.‘
`
`
`
`
`
`MeanTotalYMRSScore
`
`
`
`
`arm 9 -6
`E to :7
`2 n: .2
`.5
`0 5 8
`E ?— U -10
`as N '3
`-- u:
`E ,9 O _12
`
`'
`
`-10.3
`I Olanzapine
`
`El Placebo
`
`_14 5
`
`“Abbreviation: LOCF = last observation carried forward.
`“Data from Tohen et al."
`"Data from Tohen et al."'
`
`OLANZAPINE
`
`Two double-blind tria1s'5"‘ lasting 3 and 4 weeks, re-
`spectively, compared olanzapine monotherapy with pla-
`cebo in the treatment of acute mania. In both studies, olan-
`
`zapine produced at least a 5-point improvement on the
`YMRS score compared with placebo (Figure 5). Olanza-
`upjne was effective in treating manic symptoms in both psy-
`Bttbtic
`d nonpsychotic mania as well as in those with
`nix
`_isodes. Of the 139 patients in the 3-week double-
`-bglgittd sti.I_§y.‘5 113 entered a 49-week, open-label extension
`p
`Foflfqne percent of patients received olanzapine
`mondthggatgduring this phase. The YMRS scores de-
`creased 'l’$rfpol'rgt§') and 88% of patients experienced re-
`mission of magic symptoms: 25% subsequently relapsed.
`HAM-D scoreffiflso *dE,qrpased by a mean of 5.77 points
`(p < .001), which sugge
`t olanzapine does not induce
`depressive symptoms and that jfinay be effective in pre-
`venting both depressive and r|’£ar‘t;s,episodes.” No cases of
`tardive dyskinesia were seen.
`Olanzapine monotherapy has als‘i5hc£n found to be at
`least as effective as lithium” or divalp.roe.'
`'odium“" for
`treating patients with acute mania. In a 6-
`I5 augmenta-
`tion study.“ 334 patients with mania who toolfdfibod stabi-
`lizers (lithium or valproic acid) received olarrzapine or
`placebo add-on therapy. The YMRS scores decreased by
`a mean of 13.11 in the olanzapine group and 9.10 in the
`placebo group (p: .003). Moreover, significantly more
`patients receiving olanzapine achieved at least a 50% de-
`crease in YMRS scores (67.7% vs. 44.7%; p = .023).
`Among the 72 patients in this study who also had substan-
`tial depressive symptoms, scores on the 21-item HAM-D
`scale decreased by 10.31 with olanzapine vs. 1.57 with
`placebo (p< .001), again consistent with the hypothesis
`that olanzapine has antidepressant properties (Figure 6).
`
`Baseline Wk? Wk2 Wk4 Wk6 M03 M06
`Visit
`
`B. Hamilton Rating Scale for Déprgssion (HAM-D)
`.4
`35
`I Mania
`Q Schizoaffectlve disorder
`30
`A
`ar ll
`
`
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`MeanTotalHAM-DScore
`
` ?"
`
`'
`
`Baseline Wk 1
`
`Wk 2
`
`Wk 6
`
`Mo 3
`
`Wk 4
`Visit
`
`"Data trom Vieta et :11." There was a highly statistically significant
`trend toward reduction in YMRS scores and HAM-D scores across all
`groups (p < .0001).
`
`done-treated patients was seen within the first week. This
`improvement in manic symptoms was evident in patients
`both with and without psychosis, suggesting that risperi-
`done is not simply an antipsychotic agent but also an ef-
`fective antimanic agent.
`A 6-month open-maintenance trial" involving 541
`patients found that risperidone. used as an add-on therapy,
`was effective in treating both manic (as measured by
`YMRS scores) and depressive symptoms (as measured
`by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D]),
`and maintaining the improvement throughout the study
`period (Figure 4, A and B). Only 7% of the patients subse-
`quently relapsed. None of the patients developed tardive
`dyskinesia during the 6-month study period: if these pa-
`tients had been taking haloperidol, 15 to 20 new cases of
`tardive dyskinesia would have been expected to emerge.
`Open data such as these will require confirmation with
`double-blind studies, but the results of this study suggest
`that risperidone does not
`induce depressive symptoms,
`and it may be useful in preventing both depressive and
`manic episodes.
`
`12
`
`J Clin Psychiatry 2002:63 (suppl 3)
`
`3of5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1015
`
`3 of 5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Figure 6. 21~ltem Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
`(I-LAM-D—21) Total Scores in Patients With Moderate-to-
`Severe Depressive Symptoms“
`
`Mean
`Baseline Score:
`
`25.41
`
`24.71
`

`_2
`
`_4
`_6
`
`_ E
`53 8
`,9 '0
`5 iii
`an 2 f_‘
`C” o
`C 9
`5 8 3.- _
`0 '
`.
`I
`.
`E '0 3
`. as
`$ '
`2 E
`33
`
`
`
`'10’
`
`1E_
`
`Olanzapine cotherapy. N =51
`El Uthium or valproic acid
`monolherapy. N = 21
`
`Novel Antipsychotics in Bipolar Disorders
`
`cause of concerns about agranulocytosis, sedation, sei-
`zures, and other side effects.
`
`In summary, a variety of novel antipsychotics have
`been used for treating patients with bipolar disorder.
`Mounting evidence supports their efficacy, their low in-
`cidence of extrapyramidal side effects and tardive dys-
`kinesia, and the suggestion that they may also have mood-
`stabilizing properties in their own right.
`
`Drug nanre.i-: carbamaiepine (Tegretol and others), chlorpromazine
`tThorazine and others). clozapine (Clozaril and others),
`tlivalproex
`sodium (Depakote), haloperidol
`tHaldol
`and others). olanzapine
`(Zyprexa), quetiapine (Seroquel). risperidone (Risperdal), valproic acid
`(Depakene and others), /.iprasidone (Geodon).
`
`“Data from Tohen et al.”:
`diagnosis and HAM-D-2l tciiiil
`
`definition of DSM-IV mixed episode
`_ re 2 20 at baseline.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Id
`
`1. Delay J, Deniker P. Harl J. Utilization thérapeutique psychiatrique d'une
`phenothiavine d’action centrale élective (4560 RP). Ann Med Psychol
`l952:l l0:ll2—ll7
`. Tohen M. Zarate CA Jr. Antipsychotic agents and bipolar disorder. J Clin
`Psycliiatry l998:59tsuppl l):38—48
`3. Keck PE Jr. Schizoaffective patients. J Clin Psychiatry llilonogmph 1995;
`I30 ):24-27
`4. Chou JC. Recent advances in treatment of acute mania. J Clin Psycho-
`phaimacol l99l:l1:3—21
`5. Goodwin FK. Jamison KR. Manic Depressive Illness. New York. NY:
`Oxford University Press; 1990
`6. Prien RF. Calfey EM Jr. Klett CJ. Comparison of lithium carbonate and
`chlorpromazine in the treatment of mania. Arch Gen Psychiatry l972:26:
`146-153
`7. Kukopulos A. Reginaldi D, Laddomada P, et al. Course of the manic-
`depressive cycle and changes caused by treatment. Pharrnakopsychiatr
`'. Neuropsychopharmakol l980;l3: 156-167
`8. Li
`n R. Leslie F, Cookson J. Depot antipsychotics in the prophylaxis
`r allective disorder. Br] Psychiatry l994;l65:li27—829
`3. Kat 3. ']';irdive dyskinesia in affective disorders. J Clin Psychiatry I999:
`iuppl
`:
`7
`ID.
`.. _.‘ on J,. _ vlqori J. Naylor GJ. et al. Comparison of the prophylactic
`acting/if Eukpshixol with placebo in litliiuin treated manic-depressive
`patients./3:‘ Psyqh
`l986;I48:723—725
`11. Sega] J. B
`I
`. Risperidone compared with both lithium and
`
`haloperidol l'|(??IliJ. x uble-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin
`
`Neurophamiaco
`998:2 "
`0
`I2. Yatham LN. Safety and etfi
`éfirisperidone as coinbiiiation therapy for
`the manic phase of bipolar diso
`: p
`'minary findings of a randomized.
`double-blind study (RlS-lNT-46) I
`.
`. Presented at the 22nd annual
`meeting of the Collegiuin lntemationalyfieuro-Psychopharmacologicum:
`July 9—l3, 2000: Brussels, Belgium
`13. Sachs GS. Safety and efficzicy of risperidoiie ‘giiersus placebo in combina-
`tion with lithium or valproale in the treatment t1'Ul1'e manic phase ofthe bi-
`polar disorder
`[abstract].
`lnt J Neuropsychophaniybol 2()(l0;3(suppl
`l):Sl43
`
`I4. Vieta E. Goikolea JM. Corbella B. et al. Risperitlone%ind efficacy
`
`in the treatment of bipolar and schizoaffective disorders. esults from a
`6-month. multicenter. open study. J Clin Psychiatry 2001 :62:hl8—8'l5
`I5. Tohen M. Sanger'fM. McE|roy SL. et al. Olanzapine. versus placebo in the
`treatment of acute mania. Am] Psychiatry 1999;156:702-709
`I6. Tohen M. Jacobs TG. Gmndy SL. et al. for the Olaimipine HGGW Study
`Group. Elficacy of olanzapine in acute bipolar mania: a double-blind.
`placebo-controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000:57:84l—849
`l7. Sanger TM. Grundy SL. Gibson PJ, et al. Long-tenn olanzapine therapy in
`the treatment of bipolar I disorden an open-label continuation phase study.
`J Clin Psychiatry 2(ltlI:62:273-28l
`I8. Berk M. lchim L, Brook S. Olanzapine compared to lithium in mania:
`a double-blind randomized controlled tnal.
`lnt Clin Psycliopharmacol
`l999;l4:339—343
`I9. Tohen MF. Baker RW, Milton DR, et al. Olaiizapine versus divalproer
`sodium for the treatment of acute mania. Presented at the 2001 annual
`
`'*p<.O0l.
`
`v#
`
`_
`
`
`Figure 7. Mania Rating Scale (MRS) Scale Qfiaiiges in
`Ziprasidone and Placebo Groups“
`
`Days
`
`I
`
`
`
`I Placebo (N= 66)
`El Zlprasidone (N = 131)
`
`1. 3
`’r
`
`MeanChangeinMRSFromBaseline 1.1.NO
`
`I
`
`.4 A
`
`"Data from Keck and Ice.“
`*p < .01.
`ip < .001.
`
`OTHER NOVEL
`ANTIPSYCHOTICS
`
`The available data on the efficacy of other novel anti-
`psychotics in bipolar disorders are more limited. A 3-week
`double-blind, placebo-controlled study“ of ziprasidone
`monotherapy in 195 acutely manic patients found that
`ziprasidone significantly improved Mania Rating Scale
`scores (Figure 7); data about the utility of ziprasidone as
`an add-on therapy are likely to be available in the near
`future. Two published uncontrolled open trials of quetia-
`pineal” suggest that it is antimanic and may be mood sta-
`bilizing, but these data await confirmation with double-
`blind studies. Finally, clozapine has also shown promise
`in open trials as an antimanic drug and mood stabi-
`lizer.3‘M5 but it is not considered a first-line treatment be-
`
`J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63 lsuppl 3)
`
`13
`
`4of5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1015
`
`4 of 5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Lakshmi N. Yatham
`
`20.
`
`meeting of the American Psychiatric Association: May 5-10. 2001: New
`Orleans, La
`Tohen M. Chengappa KNR. Suppcs TR. et al. Efficacy of olamapine in
`combination with valproate or lithium in the treatment of mania in patients
`partially nonresponsive to valproate or lithium monotherapy. Arch Gen
`Psycliiatry. In press
`Keck PE Jr, lce K. A 3-week double-blind. randomized trial ol"1iprasidone
`in the acute treatment of mania [abstract]. Int 1 Neuropsychopharmacol
`20t)0;3(suppl l):S342
`. Ghaemi SN, Katzow .11. The use of quetiapine for treatrnent-resistant
`
`21.
`
`22
`
`24.
`
`bipolar disorder: a case series. Ann Clin Psychiatry 1999:1 l:137—140
`23. Zamte CA. Rothschild A, Fletcher KE. et al. Clinical predictors of acute
`response with quetiapine in psychotic mood disorders. J Clin Psychiatry
`2(}00:61:185—l89
`Ca1abreseJR, Kimmel SE. Woyshville MJ, et al. Clozapine for treatment-
`rel'ractory mania. Am .1 Psychiatry 1996; l53:759—764
`Suppes T, Webb A. Paul B. et al. Clinical outcome in a randomized 1-year
`trial of clozapine versus treatment as usual lor patients with treatment-
`resistant
`illness and a history of mania. Am 1 Psychiatry 1999:1561:
`1164-1169
`
`25.
`
`14
`
`J Clin Psychiatry 2002:63 (suppl 3)
`
`5of5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1015
`
`5 of 5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1015
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket