throbber
1 of2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1007
`
`1 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`haloperidol, IM ziprasidone was consistently associated with a
`lower movement disorder burden leg, akathisia, dystonia, EPS.
`hypertonia} at all doses investigated. in all studies. clinically signifi-
`cant changes in blood pressure and heart rate associated with
`IM ziprasidone were isolated and transient; treatment-emergent
`postural hypotension was observed in one ziprasidone-treated
`patient in one study. There were no QTC values 2500 msec with
`IM ziprasidone.
`Conclusion: In clinical trials. IM ziprasidone in divided doses up
`to 80 mglday was well tolerated. with low incidences of AE-related
`discontinuations and movement disorder AEs.
`
`Flesults: Aripiprazole produced statistically significant improve-
`ments in Y-MFIS Total score {-8.15 vs. ~3.35. p£0.01] compared
`to placebo. The response rate was significantly higher in the aripi-
`prazole group than the placebo group (40% vs. 19%, p$0.01}. For
`all efficacy variables, aripiprazole separated from placebo by day
`4. Discontinuations due to adverse events did not differ between
`the aripiprazole and placebo groups. and there were no significant
`changes in weight versus placebo.
`Conclusion: Aripiprazole was effective and well tolerated in the
`treatment of acute mania in patients with bipolar disorder in this
`randomized. placebo-controlled trial.
`
`H3313
`
`Wednesday, May 22, 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.
`
`nears
`
`Wednesday, May 22, 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.
`
`Olanzapine Improves Tardive Dysklnesla in Patients
`with Schizophrenia
`Bruce J. Kinon, M.D.. Lilly Fiesearch Lab, Eli Lilly And
`Company. Lilly Corporate Center, indianapolis. IN 46285;
`Virginia L. Stautfer. Pharm.D.. Lynn Wang. M.S., Khanhn T. Thi
`
`Summary:
`
`Objective: We report preliminary findings of the effects of clan-
`zapine (OLZ) treatment upon tardive dyskinesia TD.
`Methods: Eligible schizophrenic subjects met restricted Fle-
`search Diagnosis Tardive Dyskinesia criteria (restricted FiD-TD}
`that specified for abnormal involuntary movements to be of at
`least moderate severity. Subjects received OLZ, 5-20 mgiday
`for 8 months within a double-blind design that included up to 2
`medication reduction (75%) periods of 2 weeks duration. TD was
`assessed with the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale {AIMS}
`and psychopathology with the Positive and Negative Syndrome
`Scale {PANSSL
`Flesulls: A significant reduction in mean AlMS Total score was
`demonstrated (N=95; BL=11.9; EP=7.5; p<.001; LOCF}. Nearly
`?0% of subjects no longer met the restricted FID-TD criteria after
`up to 8 months of treatment, with greater than 50% improving as
`early as 8 weeks. No statistically significant rebound worsening
`of TD was found during the blinded drug reduction periods. A
`significant improvement in the PANSS occurred (BL=66.2; EP=
`59.7; p<.001. LOCF}.
`Conclusion: These data, suggesting an ameliorative, rather than
`masking effect. and the concurrent further improvement in clinical
`status suggests that OLZ may offer a potential treatment alterna
`live for managing the schizophrenic patient with pre-existing TD.
`
`NFI314
`
`Wednesday, May 22, 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.
`
`Aripiprazole Versus Placebo in Acute Mania
`
`Paul E. Keck. Jr.. M.D.. Biological Psychiatry Department. Univ.
`of Cincinnatti College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way.
`ML559, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0559; Anutosh Fl. Saha, Ph.D.,
`Taro lwamoto, Ph.D., Darlene Jody, M.D.. Stavros
`Tourkodimitris, Ph.D.. Donald G. Archibald, M.Phil., Flonald N.
`Marcus, MD.
`
`Summary:
`
`Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole.
`thefirst next-generation atypical antipsychotic with a unique mech-
`anism of action (dopamine-serotonin system stabilizer} to placebo
`in patients with acute bipolar mania.
`Methods: This Phase III. multicenter. double-blind. placebo-
`controlled study randomized 262 patients with acute mania to
`aripiprazole 30 mg (reduced to 15 mg if unable to tolerate) or
`placebo for 3 weeks. Patients remained hospitalized for a mini-
`mum of two weeks of the treatment phase. The primary measure
`ct efficacy was the change in Y-MRS Total score. Flesponse was
`delined as a decrease of 250% in Y-MRS Total score.
`
`ziprasidone Versus Olanzapine in Schizophrenia:
`Six-Month Continuation Study
`George M. Simpson. M.D.. Department of Psychiatry. l.AC/
`USMC Medical Center, 2020 Zonal Avenue, lFlD Floom 20. Los
`Angeles, CA 90033, Peter J. Weiden, M.D.. Teresa A. Pigctt.
`M.D.. Steven J. Ftomano. M.D., Cynthia Siu, Ph.D.
`
`Summary:
`
`Objective: To compare long-term efficacy and tolerability of zi-
`prasidone and olanzapine in schizophrenia or schizoalfective dis-
`order.
`Methods: This 6-month. blinded continuation study followed
`hospitalized patients who had completed a 6-week randomized
`trial with satisfactory clinical response (CG!-I 52 or 220% reduction
`in symptom severity by PANSS Total} and were discharged on
`olanzapine 5-15 mg OD {n=71) or ziprasidone 40-80 mg BID {n=
`62}. Primary efficacy measures were BPFIS and CG]-S; secondary
`variables included PANSS Total and Positive and Negative Sub-
`scale scores. Toierablllty assessments included tasting lipids. in-
`sulin. glucose, and weight.
`Results: Ziprasidone- and olanzapine-treated patients demon-
`strated comparable changes in BPRS, CGI-S. and PANSS Total
`and Subscale scores from baseline of 6-week study to endpoint
`of 6-month continuation. Changes during continuation phase did
`not differ significantly between groups. Olanzapine-treated pa-
`tients exhibited signiflcant mean increases versus ziprasidone in
`endpoint weight (P<0.001} and BM] (P=0.001}. and significant
`median increases versus baseline in LDL-C {P<0.01),
`insulin
`(P<0.05). glucose {P=0.D5}, and fasting liver enzymes (P<0.05).
`Both agents displayed low incidence of movement disorders. No
`patients had QTc 2500 msec.
`Conclusions: ziprasidone and olanzapine demonstrated com-
`parable antipsychotic efficacy in long-term treatment. Olanzapine
`patients alone exhibited sustained weight gain and deleterious
`metabolic changes.
`
`H3316
`
`Wednesday, May 22, 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.
`
`Antlpsychotlc llitonotherapy Versus Combination
`Treatment with Valporate in Hospitalized Patients
`with Acute Schizophrenia: A Double-Blind, Multi-
`Center Study
`Leslie L. Citrome. M.D.. Clinical Research/CHEF. Nathan Kline
`institute, I40 Old Orangeburg Road. Building 37, Orangeburg,
`NY 10962-2210, David G. Daniel. M.D.. Adel A. Wassef. M.D..
`Katherine A. Tracy, M.D.. Patricia Wozniak. Ph.D.. Daniel E.
`Casey. M.D.
`
`Summary:
`
`Obiective: This study compared the efficacy and safety of atypi-
`cal antipsychotic monotherapy (olanzapine or risperidone} versus
`combination treatment with valproate (divalproex sodium) in pa-
`tients with an acute episode of schizophrenia.
`
`86
`
`2 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1007

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket