`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`ALKERMES PHARMA IRELAND LTD.
`
`and ALKERMES, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case: IPR2017-00287
`
`Patent NO. 9,125,939 B2
`
`DECLARATION OF NICHOLAS K. MITROKOSTAS IN SUPPORT OF
`
`PETITIONERS’ MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION UNDER 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`1 Of5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. ‘I077
`
`1 of 5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1077
`
`
`
`I, Nicholas K. Mitrokostas, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I obtained a BA. from Harvard College in 1999, and a J.D. from
`
`Georgetown University Law Center in 2003.
`
`2.
`
`I am currently a partner in the law firm of Goodwin Procter LLP, a
`
`position which I have held since 2011. In my 12 years of law practice, I have
`
`focused primarily on representing clients in patent litigations involving the
`
`pharmaceutical and chemical arts in United States district courts and the Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Through this work, I have gained extensive
`
`experience as a litigating attorney, particularly in patent cases.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bars of the Commonwealth of
`
`Massachusetts and the State of New York. I am admitted to practice before the
`
`United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. I am also admitted
`
`to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and
`
`the Supreme Court of the United States.
`
`4.
`
`In the past three years, I have successfully applied to appear pro hac
`
`vice before the Office in the following proceedings: IPR20l5-00643, IPR201 S-
`
`00644, and IPR20l5-00830 (all on behalf of Yeda Research and Development Co.
`
`Ltd.), and IPR20l5-01835 and IPR2015—01836 (both on behalf of The Trustees of
`
`the University of Pennsylvania).
`
`2 of5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. ‘I077
`
`2 of 5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1077
`
`
`
`5.
`
`I have over a decade of experience litigating patent cases involving
`
`the chemical and pharmaceutical arts. Below is a brief listing of some of the recent
`
`cases I have litigated in this area:
`
`a.
`
`Trial counsel in Pfizer Inc. er al. v. IVAX Pharmaceuticals Inc. ,
`
`Case No. 2:07—cv—00 1 74—DMC~1\/[F (D.N.J.)
`
`b.
`
`Trial counsel in In Re Bendamustine Consolidated Cases, Case
`
`No. 1:13—cv-02046-GMS (D. Del.)
`
`c.
`
`Trial and appellate counsel in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
`
`at al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al. , Case No. 1:08-cv-07611-WI-[P-AJP
`
`(S.D.N.Y.)
`
`d.
`
`Trial counsel in In re Copaxone 40 mg Consolidated Cases,
`
`Case No. 14-cv-.01 171 —~ GMS (D.Del.)
`
`6.
`
`I have substantial familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding. I have developed a strong familiarity with U.S. Patent No. 9,125,939,
`
`its prosecution history, its general subject matter, and the prior art references relied
`
`upon by Petitioners in support of its invalidity grounds in this proceeding. In
`
`addition, I have advised and counseled Petitioners regarding these patents.
`
`Furthermore, I have thoroughly reviewed the Petition and accompanying Exhibits
`
`submitted in this proceeding.
`
`3 of5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. ‘I077
`
`3 of 5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1077
`
`
`
`7.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`8.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body denied.
`
`9.
`
`I have never been subj ect to any sanction or contempt citation
`
`imposed by any court or administrative body.
`
`10.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`11.
`
`I agree to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`1 1.19(a).
`
`12.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
`
`correct. I filrther declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on infonnation and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under section 1001 of title 18 of the United States Code, and that such willful false
`
`statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patent issued
`
`thereon.
`
`4 of5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. ‘I077
`
`4 of 5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1077
`
`
`
`Executed on: January 26, 2017
`
`/,
`
`Nicholas K. Mitrokostas
`
`5 of5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. ‘I077
`
`5 of 5
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1077
`
`