throbber
272
`
`Pharmacopysychiat. 21 (1988) 272-273
`© Georg ThiemeVerlag Stuttgart - New York
`
`Long-term Therapy of Affective Disorders: Monotherapy
`or Polypharmacy?
`
`W. Konig, R. Rissom, G. Kalfoglu, A. Stein, F. Reimer
`
`Psychiatric Hospital Weinsberg (Head: Prof. Dr. F. Reimer), Weinsberg, FRG
`
`Introduction
`
`In the treatment of affective disorders the use of a combined
`psychopharmacotherapy is nowadays common among physi-
`cians both in practice as well as in clinics. Analyses of prescrip-
`tions have shown that polypharmacy sometimes is used even
`more often than monotherapy (Grohmannet al., 1982; Muiller-
`Oerlinghausen, 1977; Salzmann, 1981; Schiissler et al., 1982).
`Administration of several psychotropic drugsat the same time
`might be useful for a speedier onset of relief or intensification of
`therapeutic effectiveness at the start of treatment. In long-term
`treatment, however, polypharmacy might
`lead to unwanted
`effects, such as abuse of benzodiazepines or tardive dyskinesia
`caused by neuroleptics. Besides thatit will lead to an increase of
`consumption of psychotropic drugs. The aim ofthe following
`study was, therefore, to analyse the prescription habits of the
`
`psychiatrists in a large hospital during one decade, especially in
`respect to long-term treatment.
`
`Methods and Patients
`
`Using the archives of the Psychiatric Hospital Weinsberg,all patients
`hospitalized from 1976 through 1985 diagnosed as “affective disorder”
`according to ICD-Nrs. 296 (8th or 9th revision, respectively) have been
`selected. All patients have been screened based on admission reports,
`clinical course during index treatment, and — as far as possible — on ca-
`tamnesis; patients who did not clearly meet the criteria of an affective
`disorder have been excluded. Patients selected for the study have been
`divided into three diagnostical subgroups: unipolar, bipolar, and invo-
`lutional depression. Next to sociodemographic data, medication at the
`day of discharge has been recorded, particularly dosages of antidepres-
`sant drugs and lithium. Indication for the dosageoflithium was blood
`level in mmol/l; antidepressants have been divided into low dosages
`(up to 75 mg/day ofa tricyclic antidepressant or equivalent dosages of
`
`Frequencyofaffective disorders, percentage of diagnostical subgroups and mean ageof female patients at the Psychiatric Hospital
`Table 1
`
`Weinsberg from 1976-1985
`
`1976
`
`1977
`
`Total (mean age)
`
`Involutional
`depressionin %
`(mean age)
`Unipolar depression
`in%
`(mean age)
`Bipolar depression
`in%
`(mean age)
`
`192
`(55.0)
`47.3
`(60.6)
`
`25.8
`(46.5)
`
`26.9
`(53,3)
`
`185
`(55.4}
`48.9
`(61.4)
`
`26.4
`(45.7)
`
`247
`
`(54.1)
`
`1978
`
`186
`(55.5)
`54.9
`(62.6)
`
`24.9
`(42.3)
`
`20.2
`(52.7)
`
`1979
`
`189
`(56.6)
`59.0
`(63.4)
`
`21.4
`(42.9)
`
`19.6
`(51.2)
`
`1980
`
`155
`(55.5)
`51.8
`(63.3)
`
`25.5
`(46.1)
`
`22.7
`(48.2)
`
`1981
`
`171
`(55.8)
`55.4
`(62.9)
`
`26.6
`(47.0)
`
`18.0
`(50.0)
`
`1982
`
`140
`(58.6)
`57.0
`(67.1)
`
`22.3
`(45.3)
`
`20.7
`(49.6)
`
`1983
`
`153
`(58.3)
`59.4
`(65.0)
`
`21.8
`(43.4)
`
`18.8
`(54.4)
`
`1984
`
`137
`(60.1)
`61.5
`(67.6)
`
`214
`(49.4)
`
`17.4
`(46.9)
`
`1985
`
`141
`(59.9)
`53.6
`(65.5)
`
`20.0
`(52.4)
`
`26.4
`(54.3)
`
`Table 2 Prescription of antidepressant drugs (AD) at the day of discharge; percentage of monotherapy and combined therapy with other
`psychotropic drugs (PD).
`
`1977 1976
`1978
`1979
`1980
`1981
`1982
`
`1983
`
`137
`
`1984
`
`101
`
`1985
`
`101
`
`Total number of
`prescriptions
`Monotherapy
`(in %)
`AD +1PD
`(in %)
`AD +2PD
`(in %)
`AD+3PD
`{in %)
`AD +4PD
`(in %)}
`
`157
`
`10.8
`
`61.8
`
`20.4
`
`5.7
`
`13
`
`151
`
`11.9
`
`55
`
`278
`
`46
`
`0.7
`
`162
`
`15.4
`
`54.3
`
`27.8
`
`25
`
`-
`
`159
`
`7.6
`
`579
`
`214
`
`25
`
`0.6
`
`144
`
`11.8
`
`74.3
`
`13.2
`
`0.7
`
`~
`
`132
`
`15.2
`
`58.3
`
`22
`
`45
`
`-
`
`121
`
`14.9
`
`55.4
`
`26.4
`
`3.3
`
`-
`
`10.9
`
`65.7
`
`22.6
`
`07
`
`~
`
`17.8
`
`58.4
`
`20.8
`
`3.0
`
`~
`
`9.9
`
`41.6
`
`38.6
`
`99
`
`-
`
`1 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1070
`
`1 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1070
`
`

`

`Long-term Therapy of Affective Disorders: Monotherapy or Polypharmacy?
`
`Pharmacopsychiat. 21 (1988)
`
`273
`
`Table 3 Prescription oflithium (LI) at the day of discharge; percentage of monotherapy and combined therapy with other psychotropic
`drugs (PD)
`
`1976
`1977
`1978
`1979
`1980
`1981
`1982
`1983
`1984
`1985
`
`
`Total number
`of prescriptions
`Monotherapy
`(in %)
`Li+1PD
`(in %)
`LI+2PD
`(in %)
`LI+3PD
`(in %)
`LI+4PD
`(in %)
`
`49
`
`6.1
`
`38.8
`
`38.8
`
`14.3
`
`2.0
`
`44
`
`68
`
`15.9
`
`56.8
`
`18.2
`
`35
`
`2.9
`
`17.1
`
`543
`
`25,7
`
`26
`
`-
`
`42.3
`
`50.0
`
`77
`
`27
`
`14.1
`
`40.7
`
`444
`
`3.8
`
`25
`
`-
`
`32.0
`
`48.0
`
`20.0
`
`17
`
`-
`
`35.3
`
`53.0
`
`17
`
`27
`
`-
`
`44.4
`
`51.9
`
`3.7
`
`15
`
`6.7
`
`33.3
`
`40.0
`
`20.0
`
`18
`
`-
`
`16.7
`
`444
`
`38.9
`
`2.3
`-
`-
`-
`~
`-
`-
`-
`-
`
`
`non-tricyclic antidepressants, respectively), average dosages (75-150
`mg/day), and high dosages (more than 150 mg/day). All together 3835
`admission reports have been reviewed. In order to warrant distinction
`ofdata, results will be presented of female patients only, who represent
`67-75% ofall patients.
`
`Results
`
`Table | shows for 1976 through 1985 the frequency of female
`patients admitted as well as the percentages of the diagnostic
`subgroups, both with respective mean ages. The proportion of
`patients with involutional depression shows, on average, a
`slight increase.
`The total increase of mean age by approximately 5 years was not
`only caused by the higher proportionofpatients with involutio-
`nal depression since the mean age ofpatients with unipolar de-
`pression increased as well.
`At the day of discharge mostly two or three different psychotro-
`pic drugs were administered as maintenance therapy (55-90%
`of all patients), less than 1% of the patients had five different
`psychotropic drugs, less than | % had none. Table 2 shows the
`relative frequency of combinations of antidepressants with
`other psychotropic drugs. From all patients discharged with an
`antidepressant as main therapeutical strategy, on the average
`only 10-15% were treated in monotherapy. 55-75% were
`discharged with a combination therapy with one other drug; up
`to 1983 mostly a low potency neuroleptic was added,as of 1984
`a benzodiazepine.
`Approximately 20% of the patients were discharged with three
`different drugs; upto the late seventies primarily with a neuro-
`tropic drug plus a low potency neuroleptic, as of the early
`eighties with a benzodiazepine and a low potency neuroleptic.
`During the decade researched, dosages of antidepressants were
`mostly low (46-58%) or average (40-46%), high dosages were
`unusual (0.8-7.4%).
`Table 3 showsthe frequenciesoflithium prescriptions; during
`the whole period there was a continual decrease. Monotherapy
`wasrarely used and there was a tendency to administerlithium
`in combination with two other psychotropic drugs, either with
`an antidepressant and a low potency neuroleptic or with a high
`potency and a low potency neuroleptic.
`Lithium bloodlevels at the day of discharge wererelatively con-
`stant throughoutthe decade, 0.56—0.70 mmol/1 (mean 0.66).
`
`Discussion
`
`On comparing prescription habits of antidepressants and
`lithium for long-term treatmentofaffective disorders at a large
`psychiatric hospital some remarkable changes were found. The
`dosages of antidepressants and lithium on the day of discharge
`remained nearly the same. Monotherapy wasrarely used, the
`numberoflithium prescriptions even decreased. On the other
`hand, the percentage of combination therapy clearly increased,
`so that after all the amountof psychotropic drugs administered
`really did increase. Of particular interest is the fact that alt-
`hough general prescriptions of benzodiazepines decreased
`within the last years (Wissenschaftliches Institut der Ortskran-
`kenkassen, 1985), we found a higher rate of benzodiazepine
`prescriptions since 1984.
`As we carried outa retrospective study, it was of course not pos-
`sible to investigate the patients’ compliance and whetheror not
`the drugs were prescribed further more. Therefore it was impos-
`sible to find outif long term consumption of psychotropic drugs
`really increased, but it probably did.
`During the last years consumption of psychotropic drugs has
`been discussed from a morecritical point of view, so that redu-
`cing prescription ofdifferent drugs at the same time might be an
`appropriate contribution to rational psychopharmacotherapy.
`To find outif there is a continuing tendency for polypharmacy
`at our hospital will be the subjectof further research.
`
`References
`Grohmann, R., A. Strauss, Ch. Gehr, E. Riither, H. Hippius: Zur Praxis
`der klinischen Therapie mit Psychopharmaka. Pharmacopsych-
`iatry 18, Karger Basel 1982.
`Miiller-Oerlinghausen, B.: Mehrfachmedikation bei Therapie und
`Prophylaxe
`depressiver Erkrankungen.
`In: H. Helmchen
`(Hrsg.): Depressive
`Syndrome.
`E.
`Banaschewski-Verlag
`Miinchen 1977.
`Salzmann, C.: Psychotropic drug use and polypharmacyin a general
`hospital. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 3 (1981) 1-9
`Schiissler, G., M. Linden, I. Otten: Patienten in der nervenarztlichen
`Praxis. Nervenarzt 53 (1982) 537-543.
`Wissenschaftliches
`Institut der Orstkrankenkassen: Pharmakolo-
`gisch-therapeutische Analyse der Kassendrztlichen Arzneiver-
`ordnungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bonn 1985.
`
`Dr. W. Kénig, Psychiatrisches Landeskrankenhaus Weinsberg, D-7102 Weinsberg, FRG
`
`2 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1070
`
`2 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1070
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket