throbber
Development of TMAP Bipolar Algorithm
`
`Texas Medication Algorithm Project:
`Development and Feasibility Testing of a Treatment
`Algorithm for Patients With Bipolar Disorder
`
`Trisha Suppes, M.D., Ph.D.; Alan C. Swann, M.D.;
`Ellen B. Dennehy, Ph.D.; Ellen D. Habermacher, B.A.; Mark Mason, M.A.;
`M. Lynn Crismon, Pharm.D.; Marcia G. Toprac, Ph.D.; A. John Rush, M.D.;
`© C
`Steven P. Shon, M.D.; and Kenneth Z. Altshuler, M.D.
`
`Received Dec. 4, 2000; accepted April 3, 2001. From the Department
`of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
`(Drs. Suppes, Dennehy, Rush, and Altshuler and Ms. Habermacher);
`Health Science Center, University of Texas, Houston (Dr. Swann); the
`Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation (TDMHMR),
`Austin (Mr. Mason and Drs. Toprac and Shon); and the College of
`Pharmacy, University of Texas, Austin (Dr. Crismon).
`Supported in part by Mental Health Connections, a partnership
`between Dallas County Mental Health and Mental Retardation (MHMR)
`and the Department of Psychiatry of the University of Texas Southwestern
`Medical Center, which receives funding from the Texas State Legislature
`and the Dallas County Hospital District; and by grant 5 R24 MH53799-05
`(Dr. Rush) from the National Institute of Mental Health.
`Reprint requests to: Trisha Suppes, M.D., Ph.D., UT Southwestern
`Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9070
`(e-mail: Patricia.Suppes@UTSouthwestern.edu).
`
`opyright 2001 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
`
`Background: Use of treatment guidelines for
`treatment of major psychiatric illnesses has in-
`creased in recent years. The Texas Medication
`Algorithm Project (TMAP) was developed to
`study the feasibility and process of developing
`and implementing guidelines for bipolar disorder,
`major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia in
`the public mental health system of Texas. This
`article describes the consensus process used to
`develop the first set of TMAP algorithms for the
`Bipolar Disorder Module (Phase 1) and the trial
`testing the feasibility of their implementation in
`inpatient and outpatient psychiatric settings
`across Texas (Phase 2).
`Method: The feasibility trial answered core
`questions regarding implementation of treatment
`guidelines for bipolar disorder. A total of 69 pa-
`tients were treated with the original algorithms
`for bipolar disorder developed in Phase 1 of
`TMAP.
`Results: Results support that physicians ac-
`cepted the guidelines, followed recommendations
`to see patients at certain intervals, and utilized
`sequenced treatment steps differentially over the
`course of treatment. While improvements in clini-
`cal symptoms (24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating
`Scale) were observed over the course of enroll-
`ment in the trial, these conclusions are limited by
`the fact that physician volunteers were utilized for
`both treatment and ratings, and there was no con-
`trol group.
`Conclusion: Results from Phases 1 and 2
`indicate that it is possible to develop and imple-
`ment a treatment guideline for patients with a
`history of mania in public mental health clinics
`in Texas. TMAP Phase 3, a recently completed
`larger and controlled trial assessing the clinical
`and economic impact of treatment guidelines
`and patient and family education in the public
`mental health system of Texas, improves upon
`this methodology.
`(J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62:439–447)
`
`One personal copy may be printed
`
`Dfordable cost. Development of clinical practice or treat-
`
`emand is increasing for continuing improvement
`in accessible, high-quality medical care at an af-
`
`ment guidelines is one response to this demand.1 In recent
`years, as the number of treatment options has expanded,
`the field of psychiatry has adopted this trend from general
`medicine focusing on the development of treatment
`guidelines and algorithms for major psychiatric illnesses.
`Guidelines should be geared to produce (1) assistance
`for physicians to make more informed decisions, (2) maxi-
`mal symptom reduction in a majority of patients, and
`(3) maximum functional recovery.2–4 In particular, the
`effort to improve the quality of care, integration of inno-
`vation and new medications, accountability of care, and
`expected economic advantages have been powerful argu-
`ments for the use of treatment algorithms in patient man-
`agement.5–7
`As application of treatment algorithms expands, it is
`important to determine whether treatment response in
`psychiatric illnesses will, in fact, be improved through a
`systematic approach to clinical management. The utility of
`treatment algorithms or consideration of the impact of
`algorithms on aspects of care besides clinical outcome has
`yet to be demonstrated. The current article describes
`Phases 1 (guideline development) and 2 (feasibility study)
`of the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) Bi-
`polar Disorder Module. This collaboration between aca-
`
`J Clin Psychiatry 62:6, June 2001
`
`439
`
`1 of 9
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1066
`
`

`

`Suppes et al.
`
`demic institutions and the public mental health system was
`conceived as a method to assess the feasibility and poten-
`tial benefits of implementing algorithms for treatment of
`major psychiatric illness (bipolar disorder, depression,
`schizophrenia) in public mental health clinics in Texas.7–9
`
`THE TEXAS MEDICATION
`ALGORITHM PROJECT (TMAP)
`
`© C
`
`The Texas Medication Algorithm Project began as a
`collaborative venture between the Texas Department of
`Mental Health and Mental Retardation (TDMHMR), re-
`searchers from the University of Texas Southwestern
`Medical Center and other state medical schools, and the
`College of Pharmacy at University of Texas Austin. Ulti-
`mately, community mental health centers, hospitals, and
`physicians across the state contributed to TMAP, as well
`as representatives from the National Alliance for the Men-
`tally Ill—Texas (NAMI-Texas), the Texas Depressive and
`Manic-Depressive Association (TXDMDA), the Mental
`Health Association in Texas (MHAT), and Texas Mental
`Health Consumers (TMHC). Phase I of TMAP was initi-
`ated to develop treatment algorithms for 3 major psychiat-
`ric disorders, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder,
`and schizophrenia. Phase 2 assessed the feasibility of im-
`plementation of the developed guidelines and the re-
`sources and methods required to implement the guidelines
`in the public sector. This article describes the develop-
`ment of the original TMAP treatment algorithms for pa-
`tients with a history of mania and the feasibility test of the
`guidelines in Phase 2 of TMAP.
`
`opyright 2001 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
`
`guidelines for treatment of patients with bipolar disorder
`around this same time, but did not provide a delineated,
`specified, decision-making approach to the treatment of
`patients with bipolar disorder.15
`The Expert Consensus Guideline for treatment of
`bipolar disorder (Kahn et al., 199616; since updated in
`Sachs et al., 200012) had been completed and was in the
`process of publication. This comprehensive set of con-
`sensus guidelines was developed using a modification of
`a method developed by the Rand Corporation.17 In this
`method, a large number of national experts were asked a
`set of questions regarding specific clinical scenarios. From
`the resultant data, statistical analyses were used to iden-
`tify treatment recommendations for various clinical sce-
`narios. The first version of the Expert Consensus Guide-
`lines was organized as a “menu” of options after step 1 or
`2, rather than a delineated, ordered sequence of treatment
`stages. The Expert Consensus Guideline developers at-
`tended and presented their findings at the TMAP consen-
`sus conference, facilitating the development of the Phase
`1 algorithms.
`The goal of the Phase 1 development of a treatment
`algorithm for bipolar disorder was to integrate the avail-
`able information regarding pharmacologic treatment of
`patients with a history of mania into an understandable,
`useful format for clinicians within busy, public, commu-
`nity mental health clinics. As a first approach, the princi-
`pal investigators (PIs) (T.S. and A.C.S.) for the TMAP
`bipolar disorder module developed a proposed algorithm
`for discussion. The content and order of these proposed
`algorithms were derived from literature review, the Ex-
`pert Consensus findings, other algorithm documents, and
`clinical research experience. Research evidence was rated
`using the method widely adopted in this area, ranging
`from Level A to C evidence.2,3 Level A data are drawn
`from randomized controlled and, in most cases, blinded
`clinical trials. Level B refer to open but randomized trials
`or, in some cases, very large clinical series. Retrospective
`studies could be considered either a Level B or C, based
`on methodology. Level C consists of smaller or more scat-
`tered case reports and expert opinion or consensus. In
`general, Level A would be viewed as the strongest form of
`evidence followed by Level B and then Level C. Because
`of the new medications available and limited efficacy data
`on the combination therapies widely used with this popu-
`lation, data of all types were used to inform and further
`develop the Phase 1 algorithm for treatment of patients
`with a history of mania.
`
`One personal copy may be printed
`
`DEVELOPMENT OF THE TMAP
`BIPOLAR DISORDER GUIDELINE: PHASE 1
`
`Algorithms provide an opportunity to organize infor-
`mation from diverse sources into an easily accessible for-
`mat. As the treatment choices for bipolar disorder have
`expanded (e.g., increasing use of newer mood stabilizers,
`atypical antipsychotic agents, and combination therapies),
`a treatment algorithm provides a useful mechanism to dis-
`seminate the most current information. The assumed ben-
`efit of this tool is clearly evident in the multiple consensus
`efforts to develop treatment guidelines for this patient
`group in the absence of controlled trials informing the
`stages of treatment after monotherapy.10–13
`The conference to develop the TMAP Phase 1 treat-
`ment algorithm for care of patients with a history of mania
`(bipolar I disorder and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar
`type) was held in September 1997. At that time, the devel-
`opment of treatment algorithms in this area was limited.
`In particular, a small gathering of experts included in the
`International Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project dis-
`cussed treatment of patients with bipolar disorder.14 The
`American Psychiatric Association also published general
`
`Finalizing the Algorithm
`The second step in this process was the convening of
`a symposium in Dallas, Texas, in September 1997. At-
`tendees included multiple stakeholders in the TMAP
`project including consumers, Texas advocacy group lead-
`ers, the clinicians who would be carrying out the Phase 2
`
`440
`
`J Clin Psychiatry 62:6, June 2001
`
`2 of 9
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1066
`
`

`

`Development of TMAP Bipolar Algorithm
`
`sus available at the time of this symposium in 1997.
`Given the data regarding medication adherence by pa-
`tients with bipolar disorder, medication choices associ-
`ated with improved tolerability were selected (e.g., dival-
`proex sodium [Depakote] and extended-release lithium,
`such as Lithobid or Eskalith). Again, the algorithms pre-
`sented and reviewed here, developed in the fall of 1997,
`do not include the newer anticonvulsants and atypical
`antipsychotics now widely available and included in the
`TMAP Phase 3 algorithms. More updated versions of the
`TMAP algorithms for treatment of bipolar disorder can
`be found on our Web site, http://www.mhmr.state.tx.us/
`centraloffice/medical director/tmap.html.
`Specification and order of mood stabilizers. Earlier
`work within public mental health centers21 suggested that
`treatment failure in this population can often be attributed
`to inadequate dosing of mood-stabilizing medications, in-
`adequate duration of exposure, or inadequate use of com-
`bination medications. The Phase 2 algorithm for treat-
`ment of manic symptoms includes combination mood
`stabilizers in Stages 2 and 3. Based on limited data sup-
`porting response in some treatment-refractory patients,22
`the simultaneous use of carbamazepine, divalproex, and
`lithium was included as Stage 3 in the Phase 2 algorithm
`for treatment of a manic or hypomanic episode. Part of the
`discussion included education on the use of combination
`medications and, in particular, the simultaneous use of 3
`mood stabilizers as an option in the treatment algorithm
`for TMAP Phase 2.
`Inclusion of atypical antipsychotic medications. An
`additional area of discussion included the appropriate use
`and timing of atypical antipsychotics. While at first only
`clozapine was specified in the algorithm, over the course
`of the feasibility trial use of risperidone increased and was
`also allowed. Use of either clozapine or risperidone in
`conjunction with a mood-stabilizing medication for treat-
`ment of manic symptoms and/or mood lability was al-
`lowed in Stage 4 of the mania/hypomania algorithm. This
`was based in part on national clinical consensus, early
`clinical reports, and the research on efficacy of clozapine
`to treat severe affective symptoms.23–27 Adjunctive use of
`either atypical or conventional antipsychotics for psy-
`chotic symptoms was allowable at any point.
`Adjunctive medications. Another area of discussion
`centered on the use of additional sleeping medication.
`Change in sleep habits is often an early and critical symp-
`tom of imminent relapse. The decision was made not to
`recommend use of the antidepressant medication trazo-
`done because of its potential to contribute to the develop-
`ment of mania. Rather, benzodiazepines and low-dose
`divalproex were suggested.
`
`Availability and Selection of Medications
`An additional issue that often affects physician choice
`of treatment is the availability of medications. In the case
`of TMAP, the treatment guidelines were not subjected to
`limits in the choice of medications, either in brand or
`generic form. Therefore, the algorithms were not based on
`economic factors (e.g., medication acquisition costs), but
`rather on the best research evidence and clinical consen-
`
`Summary
`The goal of Phase 1 of the Texas Medication Algorithm
`Project was to develop treatment guidelines for major
`
`J Clin Psychiatry 62:6, June 2001
`
`441
`
`feasibility study in Texas, and prominent researchers who
`would serve as consultants to the project on both treat-
`ment issues and algorithm development and implementa-
`tion. Inclusion of clinicians who will be implementing an
`algorithm in the development process has been associated
`with greater support of and adherence to the final prod-
`uct.18 The principle of including academics, physicians,
`administrators, staff from public agencies, advocates, and
`consumers has been central to the success of TMAP and
`exemplifies the need to include all stakeholders in guide-
`line development.7,9,19,20
`The day included a series of individual presentations,
`including review of other guidelines and current research
`and consumer presentations and discussion of experi-
`ences. There was ample opportunity for interactive dis-
`cussion, questions, and debate by all participants. The
`generalized consensus algorithm that had been developed
`by the PIs was presented in a step-by-step manner. The
`document was discussed in detail and consensus reached.
`
`© C
`
`opyright 2001 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
`
`General Issues Regarding the Algorithms
`One of the critical discussion points was whether to
`develop separate algorithms for treatment of manic/hypo-
`manic episodes and depressive episodes. Two algorithms
`were eventually developed for TMAP Phase 2.
`The group devoted time to definitions of symptom re-
`sponse, parameters of adequate dosing, and duration of
`medication trials. Given the short duration of the Phase 2
`trial that was planned (patients treated for up to 4 months),
`a profound degree of response was not anticipated. Sug-
`gested time lines were developed, providing recommen-
`dations for clinical decisions to occur at 2 weeks, 4 weeks,
`and 6 weeks after the start of a new medication treatment.
`Certain principles to guide implementation were de-
`fined by the symposium discussions. One of the most
`important principles was that clinical judgment and pa-
`tient history superseded any specific step in the treatment
`algorithm. If a patient had a clear history of nonresponse
`or a significant side effect to a specific medication, there
`was no expectation that the patient would repeat that step.
`It was clearly communicated that the order of stages was
`based on the best available scientific data, expert consen-
`sus, and consideration of safety and tolerance issues, but
`that this order was not inflexible. Physician judgment and
`patient history and preference were expected to interact
`with the recommendations of the guideline.
`
`One personal copy may be printed
`
`3 of 9
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1066
`
`

`

`Suppes et al.
`
`Figure 1. Strategies for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder:
`Hypomanic/Manic Episode
`
`Figure 2. Strategies for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder:
`Major Depressive Episode
`
`(cid:51)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:79)
`
`(cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)
`(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)
`(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:88)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:71)
`(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)
`(cid:69)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)
`(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:172)
`
`(cid:53)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:92)(cid:70)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)
`(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:76)(cid:91)(cid:72)(cid:71)
`
`(cid:40)(cid:88)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:68)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:39)(cid:57)(cid:51)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:37)(cid:61)
`
`(cid:47)(cid:76)
`
`(cid:39)(cid:57)(cid:51)
`
`© C
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)
`(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)
`(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:88)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:71)
`(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)
`(cid:69)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)
`(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:172)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:56)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:86)
`(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)
`(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:91)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:86)
`
`(cid:48)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:17)
`(cid:48)(cid:76)(cid:91)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:53)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:86)
`(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:4)
`
`(cid:51)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:79)
`
`(cid:48)(cid:39)(cid:40)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:36)(cid:71)(cid:71)
`(cid:36)(cid:39)(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:47)(cid:76)
`
`(cid:49)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:76)
`
`(cid:36)(cid:71)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:76) (cid:14)
`(cid:36)(cid:39)(cid:16)(cid:20)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:21)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)
`(cid:36)(cid:39)(cid:16)(cid:21)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:86)
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:72)(cid:91)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:71)
`(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:81)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:72)
`(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:178)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:85)
`(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:72)
`(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:178)(cid:25)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:69)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:39)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`(cid:48)(cid:36)(cid:50)(cid:44)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:55)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:25)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`(cid:50)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:85)
`(cid:11)(cid:72)(cid:17)(cid:74)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:12)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:25)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`(cid:50)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:85)
`(cid:11)(cid:47)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:12)
`
`(cid:36)(cid:39)(cid:16)(cid:20) (cid:32) (cid:37)(cid:88)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:54)(cid:53)(cid:44)
`(cid:36)(cid:39)(cid:16)(cid:21) (cid:32) (cid:48)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:91)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:72)
`(cid:44)(cid:81)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:12)
`(cid:57)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:91)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:18)(cid:49)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:93)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)
`(cid:47)(cid:76) (cid:32) (cid:47)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:88)(cid:80)
`
`(cid:55)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:86)
`(cid:36)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:36)(cid:39)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)
`(cid:22)(cid:178)(cid:25)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:79)(cid:88)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:86)
`(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)
`
`depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia.
`The PIs of the bipolar disorder module, with feedback
`elicited in a consensus conference, developed an under-
`standable, user-friendly algorithm for use by physicians
`in busy, overburdened public mental health clinics. All
`groups present at the symposium agreed that these guide-
`lines were helpful in clinical decision making, but still
`flexible enough to be customized to individual history
`and response. Importantly, other than the International
`Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project,14 the TMAP al-
`gorithms were the first to codify and delineate a series of
`specific treatment stages taking into account efficacy,
`safety, and tolerability. The algorithms utilized in Phase 2
`of the TMAP can be viewed in Figures 1 and 2.
`
`FEASIBILITY TRIAL OF
`THE ALGORITHMS: PHASE 2
`
`The primary goal of Phase 2 was to evaluate the feasi-
`bility of integrating the treatment guidelines developed
`in Phase 1 into public mental health settings. To that end,
`the feasibility trial was designed to provide preliminary
`answers to the following questions, among others:
`(1) Would physicians accept and implement treatment
`guidelines? (2) Would use of treatment guidelines be
`
`442
`
`J Clin Psychiatry 62:6, June 2001
`
`(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:72)
`(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:178)(cid:21)
`(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:18)
`(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:92)
`(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:178)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:21)
`
`(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)
`(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:178)(cid:21)
`(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:18)
`(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:92)
`(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:178)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`(cid:47)(cid:76) (cid:14)
`(cid:36)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:89)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:86)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`(cid:39)(cid:57)(cid:51) (cid:14) (cid:47)(cid:76)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`(cid:38)(cid:37)(cid:61) (cid:14) (cid:47)(cid:76) (cid:14) (cid:39)(cid:57)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`One personal copy may be printed
`
`(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:92)
`(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:178)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:86)
`(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:3)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:86)(cid:12)
`
`(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:72)
`(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:178)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:86)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:23)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:24)
`
`(cid:38)(cid:37)(cid:61) (cid:32) (cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:69)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:93)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:72)
`(cid:39)(cid:57)(cid:51) (cid:32) (cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:72)(cid:91)
`(cid:47)(cid:76) (cid:32) (cid:47)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:88)(cid:80)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`(cid:36)(cid:71)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:93)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:72)
`(cid:11)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:37)(cid:61)(cid:12)
`
`(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`(cid:40)(cid:38)(cid:55)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:22)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:23)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:24)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)
`
`(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:51)
`
`opyright 2001 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
`
`4 of 9
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1066
`
`

`

`Table 1. Basic Demographic Information of 69 Patients With
`Bipolar I Disorder or Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Typea
`Outpatient
`Inpatient
`Sample (N = 44)
`Sample (N = 25)
`
`15 (34)
`29 (66)
`
`40.43
`19–65
`
`86
`14
`0
`19
`
`© C
`
`Variable
`Gender, N (%)
`Male
`Female
`Age, y
`Mean
`Range
`Ethnicity, %
`Caucasian
`African American
`Hispanic/Latino
`% Reporting a current
`alcohol/substance abuse
`problem
`Baseline symptoms
`(total 24-item BPRS score
`at first visit)
`56  15.43
`Mean  SD
`29–96
`Range
`aAbbreviation: BPRS = Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
`
`11 (44)
`14 (56)
`
`39.28
`18–64
`
`44
`44
`12
`48
`
`74  14.90
`49–100
`
`Development of TMAP Bipolar Algorithm
`
`clinician in their clinic. There were no data collected
`on the reliability of these ratings. The educational materi-
`als were reviewed, and parameters for providing patient
`and/or family education discussed. In addition to this ini-
`tial training session, participants were provided with a
`brief manual that covered the procedures, forms, educa-
`tional materials, and other basic questions regarding im-
`plementation.
`
`Results
`Sixty-nine patients with a diagnosis of bipolar I disor-
`der or schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, were enrolled
`into TMAP Phase 2. Forty-four of these patients were
`treated in an outpatient setting; 25 were treated as inpa-
`tients. Demographic information about each subsample is
`included in Table 1. As this was a feasibility trial of algo-
`rithm implementation in public sector mental health cen-
`ters and hospitals, no efforts were mad

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket