throbber
—SSSSSSSeeaaeee
`
`
`DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL
`MANUAL OF
`MENTAL DISORDERS
`
`FOURTH EDITION
`
`TEXT REVISION
`
`DSM-IV-TR™
`
`
`
`Published by the
`American Psychiatric Association
`Washington, DC
`
`
`
`1 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`1 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`os
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aeeaees
`
`
`a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Copyright © 2000 American Psychiatric Association
`DSM, DSM-IV, and DSM-IV-TR are trademarks of the American Psychiatric Association. Use
`of these terms is prohibited without permission of the American Psychiatric Association.
`ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.Unless authorized in writing by the APA, no partof this book may
`be reproduced or used in a mannerinconsistent with the APA's copyright. This prohibition ap-
`plies to unauthorized uses or reproductions in any form, including electronic applications.
`Correspondence regarding copyright permissions should be directed to the DSM Permissions,
`Office of Publishing Operations, American Psychiatric Association, 1400 K Street, N.W., Wash-
`ington, DC 20005.
`
`Manufactured in the United States of America on acid-free paper.
`American Psychiatric Association
`1400 K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005
`WwWww.psych.org
`
`The correctcitation for this book is American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical
`Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC, American Psychi-
`atric Association, 2000.
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`Diagnostic andstatistical manual of mental disorders ; DSM-IV.—4th ed., text revision.
`Pp.
`; cm.
`Prepared by the Task Force on DSM-IV and other committees and work groupsof the Amer-
`ican Psychiatric Association.
`Includes index.
`ISBN 0-89042-024-6 (casebound : alk. paper)—ISBN 0-89042-025-4 (pbk. : alk. Paper)
`1. Mentalillness—Classification—Handbooks, manuals, etc. 2. Mental illness—Diagnosis—
`Handbooks, manuals,etc. I. Tite: DSM-IV. I, American Psychiatric Association. IN, American
`Psychiatric Association. Task Force on DSM-IV.
`[DNLM:1, Mental Disorders—classification. 2. Mental Disorders—diagnosis.
`WM 15 D536 2000]
`RC455.2.C4 D536 2000
`616,89'075—dc21
`
`00-024852
`
`
`
`British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
`A CIP recordis available from the British Library.
`
`Text Design—Anne Barnes
`Manufacturing—R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company
`
`
`
`
`2 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`2 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`

`

`
`
`TASK FORCE ON DSM-IV
`
`ALLEN FRANCES, M.D.
`Chairperson
`HAROLD ALAN PINCUS, M.D.
`Vice-Chairperson
`MICHAEL B, First, M.D.
`Editor, Text and Criteria
`
`Nancy Coover Andreasen, M.D., Ph.D,
`David H. Barlow, Ph.D.
`Magda Campbell, M.D.
`Dennis P. Cantwell, M.D.
`Ellen Frank, Ph.D.
`Judith H. Gold, M.D.
`John Gunderson, M.D.
`Robert E. Hales, M.D.
`Kenneth S. Kendler, M.D,
`
`David J. Kupfer, M.D.
`Michael R. Liebowitz, M.D.
`Juan Enrique Mezzich, M.D., Ph.D.
`Peter E. Nathan,Ph.D.
`Roger Peele, M.D.
`Darrel A. Regier, M.D., M.P.H.
`A. John Rush, M.D.
`
`Chester W. Schmidt, M.D.
`Marc Alan Schuckit, M.D.
`David Shaffer, M.D.
`Robert L. Spitzer, M.D.
`Special Adviser
`Gary J. Tucker, M.D.
`B. Timothy Walsh, M.D.
`Thomas A. Widiger, Ph.D.
`Research Coordinator
`
`Janet B. W. Williams, D.5.W.
`John C. Urbaitis, M.D.
`Assembly Liaison
`James J. Hudziak, M.D.
`Resident Fellow (1990-1993)
`Junius Gonzales, M.D.
`Resident Fellow (1988-1990)
`
`Ruth Ross, M.A.
`Science Editor
`Nancy E. Vettorello, M.U.P.
`Administrative Coordinator
`Wendy Wakefield Davis, Ed.M.
`Editorial Coordinator
`Cindy D. Jones
`Administrative Assistant
`Nancy Sydnor-Greenberg, M.A.
`Administrative Consultant
`Myriam Kline, M.S.
`Focused Field-Trial Coordinator
`James W, Thompson, M.D., M.P.H.
`Videotape Field-Trial Coordinator
`
`
`
`
`LifeAME,ANTAaaMia
`
`
`—_——_—
`
`The DSM-IV Text Revision Work Groupsare listed on pp. xv—xvii.
`
`3 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`3 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`

`

`
` Use of the Manual
`
`7 ‘
`
`on
`
`Coding and Reporting Procedures
`
`-
`
`
`
`F
`
`
`
`Diagnostic Codes
`Theofficial coding system in usein the UnitedStates as of Publication of this manual
`is the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification
`(ICD-9-CM). Most DSM-IV disorders have a numerical ICD-9-CM code that appears
`=. several times: 1) preceding the nameofthe disorderin the Classification (pp. 13-26),
`a 2) at the beginningof the text section for each disorder, and 3) accompanyingthe cri-
`teria set for each disorder. For some diagnoses (e.g., Mental Retardation, Substance-
`
`; Induced Mood Disorder), the appropriate code depends onfurther specification and
`
`is listed after the text and criteria set for the disorder. The namesof some disorders
`are followedbyalternative terms enclosed in parentheses, which, in most cases, Were
`
`“the DSM-III-R namesforthe disorders,
`__. The useof diagnostic codesis fundamental to medical record keeping. Diagnostic
`
`<0 ing facilitates data collection and retrieval and compilation ofstatistical informa-
`ton. Codes also areoften required to report diagnostic datato interested third parties,

`
`iticluding governmentalagencies, private insurers, and the World Health Organiza-
`
`tion. For example, in the United States, the use of these codes has been mandated by
`he Health Care Financing Administration for purposes ofreimbursement under the
`Medicare system.
`,. Subtypes (someof which are coded in thefifth digit) and specifiers are provided
`- for increased specificity. Subtypes define mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive
`Phenomenological subgroupings within a diagnosis and are indicated bythe instruc-
`‘Hon “specify type”in thecriteria set. For example, Delusional Disorderis subtyped
`|based on the content of the delusions, with seven subtypes provided: Erotomanic
`=Type, Grandiose Type, Jealous Type, Persecutory Type, Somatic Type, Mixed Type,
`and Unspecified Type. In contrast, specifiers are notintended to be mutuallyexclusive
`-0rjointly exhaustive and are indicated by theinstruction “specify” or “specify if” in
`=»
`thecriteria set (e.g., forSocial Phobia, the instructionnotes “Specifyif: Generalized”).
`: Specifiers Provide an opportunity to define a more homogeneous subgrouping of
`individuals with the disorder whosharecertain features (e.g., Major Depressive Dis-
`= Order, With Melancholic Features). Althougha fifth digit is sometimes assigned to
`Sode a Subtypeorspecifier (e.g., 294.11 Dementia of the Alzheimer’s Type, With Late
`“set, With Behavioral Disturbance)or severity (296.21 Major Depressive Disorder,
`~ Single Episode, Mild), the majority of subtypes and specifiers included in DSM-IV
`ee becoded within theICD-9-CMsystem and areindicated onlyby includingthe
`type orspecifierafterthename ofthe disorder(e.g., Social Phobia, Generalized),
`
`
`
`j
`
`j
`
`|
`
`|
`
`Seaeae
`
`4 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`4 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`

`

`
`
`Use of the Manual
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|
`
`Severity and Course Specifiers
`A DSM-IV diagnosis is usually applied to the individual’s current presentation andis
`nottypically used to denote previous diagnoses from which the individual] has recov-
`ered. The following specifiers indicating severity and course maybelisted after the
`diagnosis: Mild, Moderate, Severe, In Partial Remission,In Full Remission, and Prior
`History,
`The specifiers Mild, Moderate, and Severe should be used only whenthefull cri-
`teria for the disorderare currently met. In deciding whetherthe presentation should
`be described as mild, moderate, or severe,the clinician should take into accountthe
`numberand intensity of the signs and symptoms of the disorder and any resulting
`impairment in occupational or social functioning. For the majority of disorders, the
`following guidelines may beused:
`Mild.
`Few,if any, symptomsin excess of those required to make the diagno-
`sis are present, and symptomsresult in no more than minor impairmentin so-
`cial or occupational functioning,
`Moderate. Symptoms or functional impairment between “mild” and “se-
`vere” are present.
`Severe. Many symptomsin excess of those required to make the diagnosis,
`or several symptomsthat are particularly severe, are present, or the symptoms
`result in marked impairmentin social or occupational functioning.
`In Partial Remission.
`Thefull criteria for the disorder were previously met,
`but currently only someof the symptomsorsigns of the disorder remain.
`In Full Remission. There are no longer any symptoms or signs of the dis-
`order, butitis still clinically relevant to note the disorder—for example,in an
`individual with previous episodesof Bipolar Disorder who has been symptom
`free on lithium for the past 3 years, After a period of timein full remission, the
`clinician may judge the individual to be recovered and, therefore, would no
`longer code the disorder as a current diagnosis. The differentiation of In Full
`
`Remission from recovered requires consideration of many factors, including
`the characteristic course of the disorder, the length oftimesincethe last period
`
`of disturbance, the total duration of the disturbance, and the need for contin-
`
`
`ued evaluation or prophylactic treatment.
`
`Prior History. For some purposes, it may be useful to note a history of the
`
`
`criteria having been metfor a disorder even whenthe individual is considered
`to be recovered from it. Such past diagnoses of mental disorder would bein-
`
`
`dicated by using the specifier Prior History (e.g., Separation Anxiety Disorder,
`
`
`Prior History, for an individual with a history of Separation Anxiety Disorder
`whohas no current disorder or who currently meetscriteria for Panic Dis-
`order).
`
` Specific criteria for defining Mild, Moderate, and Severe have been provided for
`the following: Mental Retardation, Conduct Disorder, Manic Episode, and Major
`
`
`
`Depressive Episode. Specific criteria for defining In Partial Remission and In Full
`Remission have been provided for the following: Manic Episode, Major Depressive
`
`
`Episode, and Substance Dependence.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`5 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`

`

`Use of the Manual
`
`nt presentation and is
`‘individual has recov-
`nay be listed after the
`| Remission, and Prior
`
`nly when the full cri-
`e presentation should
`take into account the
`der and any resulting
`arity of disorders, the
`
`d to makethe diagno-
`nor impairmentin so-
`
`reen “mild” and “se-
`
`> makethe diagnosis,
`sent, or the symptoms
`incioning.
`were previously met,
`disorder remain.
`is or signs ofthe dis-
`r—for example, in an
`ho has been symptom
`‘in full remission, the
`. therefore, would no
`ferentiation of In Full
`ny factors, including
`e sincethe last period
`1 the need for contin-
`
`note a history of the
`lividual is considered
`lisorder would be in-
`on Anxiety Disorder,
`ion Anxiety Disorder
`riteria for Panic Dis-
`
`ve been provided for
`Episode, and Major
`2>mission and In Full
`le, Major Depressive
`
`Use of the Manual
`
`Recurrence
`
`3
`
`Not infrequently in clinical practice, individuals after a period of time in which the
`full criteria for the disorder are no longer met(i.e., in partial or full remission or re-
`covery) may develop symptoms that suggest a recurrenceoftheir original disorder
`put that do not yet meetthefull threshold for that disorder as specified in the criteria
`set, It is a matter of clinical judgment as to how bestto indicate the presence ofthese
`symptoms. The following optionsare available;
`
`« If the symptomsare judged to be a new episode of a recurrent condition,the dis-
`order may be diagnosed as current (or provisional) even before the full criteria
`have been met(¢.g., after meeting criteria for a Major Depressive Episode for only
`10 days instead of the 14 days usually required).
`« If the symptomsare judged tobeclinically significant but it is not clear whether
`they constitute a recurrence of the original disorder, the appropriate Not Other-
`wise Specified category may be given.
`* Ifitisjudged that the symptomsare notclinically significant, no additional current
`or provisional diagnosisis given, but “Prior History” may be noted (see p.2).
`
`Principal Diagnosis/Reason for Visit
`
`When more than one diagnosis for an individualis given in an inpatientsetting, the
`principal diagnosis is the condition established after studyto be chiefly responsible for
`oceasioning the admission ofthe individual. When morethan one diagnosis is given
`for an individual in an outpatient setting, the reason for visit is the condition that is
`chiefly responsible for the ambulatory care medical services received duringthevisit.
`In mostcases, the principal diagnosis or the reason forvisit is also the main focus of
`attention or treatment. It is often difficult (and somewhat arbitrary) to determine
`which diagnosis is the principal diagnosis or the reason forvisit, especially in situa-
`tions of “dual diagnosis” (a substance-related diagnosis like Amphetamine Depen-
`dence accompanied by a non-substance-related diagnosis like Schizophrenia). For
`example, it may be unclear which diagnosis should be considered “principal” for an
`individual hospitalized with both Schizophrenia and AmphetamineIntoxication, be-
`cause each condition may have contributed equally to the need for admission and
`treatment,
`Multiple diagnoses can be reported in a multiaxial fashion (see p. 35) or in a non-
`axial fashion (see p. 37). When the principal diagnosis is an Axis I disorder,this is in-
`dicated by listing it first. The remaining disorders are listed in order of focus of
`attention and treatment, When a person has both an Axis I and an Axis II diagnosis,
`the principal diagnosis or the reasonforvisit will be assumedto be on Axis L unless
`the Axis II diagnosis is followed by the qualifying phrase “(Principal Diagnosis)” or
`“(ReasonforVisit).”
`
`Provisional Diagnosis
`The Specifier provisional can be used whenthereis a strong presumption thatthefull
`“titeria will ultimately be metfor a disorder, but not enough informationis available
`
`
`
`6 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`6 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`

`

`4
`
`Use of the Manual
`
`to makea firm diagnosis. Theclinician can indicate the diagnostic uncertainty by re-
`cording “(Provisional)” following the diagnosis. For example,the individual appears
`to have a Major Depressive Disorder, butis unable to give an adequatehistory to es-
`tablish thatthe full criteria are met. Anotheruse of the term provisionalis for thosesit-
`uations in which differential diagnosis depends exclusively on the durationofillness.
`For example, a diagnosis of Schizophreniform Disorder requires a duration ofless
`than 6 months and can only be given provisionally if assigned before remission has
`occurred.
`
`Use of Not Otherwise Specified Categories
`Becauseofthe diversity ofclinical presentations,it is impossible for the diagnostic no-
`menclature to cover every possible situation. For this reason, each diagnostic class has
`at least one Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) category and someclasses have several
`NOScategories. There are four situations in which an NOSdiagnosis may be appro-
`priate:
`
`agnostic uncertainty:
`
`* The presentation conforms to the general guidelines for a mental disorder in the
`diagnostic class, but the symptomatic picture does not meetthe criteria for any of
`the specific disorders. This would occureither when the symptoms are below the
`diagnostic threshold for one of the specific disorders or whenthere is an atypical
`or mixed presentation.
`* The presentation conformsto a symptom pattern that has not been includedin the
`DSM-IV Classification but that causesclinically significant distress or impairment.
`Research criteria for some of these symptom patterns have beenincludedin Appen-
`dix B ("Criteria Sets and Axes Provided for Further Study”), in which case a page
`reference to the suggested research criteria set in AppendixBis provided.
`* There is uncertainty aboutetiology (i.e., whether the disorder is due to a general
`medical condition, is substance induced,oris primary).
`* There is insufficient opportunity for complete data collection (e.g., in emergency
`situations)or inconsistent or contradictory information,but thereis enoughinfor-
`mation to placeit within a particular diagnostic class(e.g., the clinician determines
`that the individual has psychotic symptoms but does not have enough information
`to diagnosea specific Psychotic Disorder).
`
`WaysofIndicating Diagnostic Uncertainty
`The followingtable indicates the various ways in whichaclinician mayindicate di-
`
`7 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`7 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`

`

`
`
`
`~ yse of the Manual
`
`-. Term
`Other Conditions That May
`ee
`OTE
`v codes(for
`_. Bea Focus of Clinical Attention)
`Be
`Br
`
`Use of the Manual
`
`2 uncertainty by re-
`individual appears
`quate history to es-
`ional is for those sit-
`‘durationof illness.
`3 a duration of less
`2fore remission has
`
`
`
`Si
`
`Examples of clinical situations
`Insufficient information to know whether or
`tb
`el
`not a presenting problemis attributable to a
`mentaldisorder, e.g., Academic Problem;
`Adult Antisocia! Behavior
`
`799.3
`
`Diagnosis or Condition Deferred on Information inadequate to make any diag-
`Axis |
`nostic judgment about an Axis | diagnosis or
`condition
`
`egories
`
`799.9 Diagnosis Deferred on Axis Il
`
`information inadequate to make any diag-
`nostic judgment about an Axis I diagnosis
`
`g 300.9 Unspecified Mental Disorder
`:
`(nonpsychotic)
`
`
`
`ir the diagnostic no-
`Enough information available to rule out a
`diagnostic class has
`Psychotic Disorder, but furtherspecification
`‘lasses have several
`is not possible
`iosis may be appro-
`298.9 Psychotic Disorder Not Otherwise|Enough information available to determine
`E
`Specified
`the presence of a Psychotic Disorder, but fur-
`ther specification is not possible
`otal disorder in the
`[Class of disorder] Not Otherwise Specified Enough information available to indicate
`ie criteria for any of
`
`itoms are below the
`@g., Depressive Disorder Not Otherwise—_—the class of disorder that is present, but fur-
`Specified
`ther specificationis not possible, either be-
`there is an atypical
`cause there is not sufficient information to
`make a more specific diagnosis or because
`the clinical features of the disorder do not
`meet the criteria for any of the specific cate-
`gories in that class
`
`_ Criteria Used to Exclude Other Diagnoses and
`’
`to Suggest Differential Diagnoses
`Mostofthecriteria sets presented in this manualinclude exclusioncriteria that are
`Necessary to establish boundaries between disorders andtoclarify differential diag-
`Noses. The severaldifferent wordingsof exclusioncriteria in thecriteria sets through-
`out DSM-IV reflectthe different types of possible relationships among disorders:
`
`7 “Criteria have never been met for...” This exclusion criterion is used to define
`alifetime hierarchy betweendisorders. For example, a diagnosis of Major Depres-
`sive Disorder can no longer be given once a Manic Episode has occurred and must
`be changed to a diagnosis of Bipolar I Disorder.
`
`RSSateTL
`aeq
`
`
`8 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`
`
`
`
`if
`
`i
`ae
`ati
`[Specific diagnosis] (Provisional)
`e.g., Schizophreniform Disorder
`‘ (Provisional)
`:
`
`Enoughinformation available to make a
`“working” diagnosis, but the clinician wishes
`to indicate a significant degree of diagnostic
`uncertainty
`
`Frequently Used Criteria
`
`een includedin the
`ress or impairment.
`included in Appen-
`1 which case a page
`s provided.
`is due to a general
`
`(e.g., in emergency
`ere is enoughinfor-
`‘linician determines
`mnough information
`
`tainty
`
`an may indicate di-
`
`8 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`

`

`6
`
`SSP cma eb
`
`Use of the Manual
`
` See tee ee ee aero Ee Peasy ee a ea Seer ale Ae ee ee Red eee
`
`*
`
`* “Criteria are not met for...” This exclusion criterion is used to establish a hier-
`archy betweendisorders (or subtypes) defined cross-sectionally. For example, the
`specifier With Melancholic Features takes precedence over With Atypical Features
`for describing the current Major Depressive Episode.
`“does not occur exclusively during the course of... This exclusion criterion
`prevents a disorder from being diagnosed when its symptom presentation occurs
`only during the course of another disorder. For example, dementia is not diag-
`nosed separately if it occurs only during delirium; Conversion Disorder is not
`diagnosed separatelyif it occurs only during Somatization Disorder; Bulimia Ner-
`vosais not diagnosed separately if it occurs only during episodes of Anorexia Ner-
`vosa, This exclusion criterion is typically used in situations in which the symptoms
`of one disorderare associated features or a subsetof the symptomsof the preempt-
`ing disorder. Theclinician should consider periods ofpartial remission as part of
`the “course of another disorder.” It should be noted that the excluded diagnosis
`can be given at times whenit occurs independently (e.g., when the excluding dis-
`orderis in full remission).
`* “notdueto the direct physiological effects of a substance(e.g., a drug of abuse,
`a medication) or a general medical condition.” This exclusioncriterion is used
`to indicate that a substance-induced and general medical etiology must be consid-
`ered and ruled outbefore the disorder can be diagnosed (e.g., Major Depressive
`Disorder can be diagnosed only after etiologies based on substance use and a gen-
`eral medical condition have been ruled out),
`* “not better accounted for by...” This exclusion criterion is used to indicate that
`the disorders mentionedin the criterion mustbe considered in the differential di-
`agnosis of the presenting psychopathology andthat, in boundary cases, clinical
`judgmentwill be necessary to determine which disorder provides the most appro-
`priate diagnosis. In such cases, the “Differential Diagnosis” section of the text for
`the disorders should be consulted for guidance.
`The general convention in DSM-IVis to allow multiple diagnoses to be assigned
`for those presentationsthat meetcriteria for more than one DSM-IV disorder. There
`are three situations in which the above-mentioned exclusioncriteria help to establish
`a diagnostic hierarchy (and thus prevent multiple diagnoses) or to highlight differen-
`tial diagnostic considerations (and thus discourage multiple diagnoses):
`* When a Mental Disorder Due to a General Medical Condition or a Substance-
`Induced Disorderis responsible for the symptoms,it preempts the diagnosis of the
`corresponding primary disorder with the same symptoms(e.g., Cocaine-Induced
`MoodDisorder preempts Major Depressive Disorder). In such cases, an exclusion
`criterion containing the phrase “not dueto the direct physiological effects of...”
`is includedin the criteria set for the primary disorder.
`* When a more pervasive disorder (e.g., Schizophrenia) has among its defining
`symptoms (or associated symptoms)whatare the defining symptomsofaless per-
`vasive disorder (e.g,, Dysthymic Disorder), one of the following three exclusion
`criteria appears in the criteria set for the less pervasive disorder, indicating that
`only the more pervasive disorder is diagnosed: “Criteria have never been met
`for...,” “Criteria are not met for. .
`.,” “does not occur exclusively during the
`course of ,. .”
`
`
`AAsAEnHARTNASAUBERBERS8SPSETHReSTUHR onie
`
`9 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`9 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`

`

`Use of the Manual
`
`use of the Manual
`
`7
`
`ied to establish a hier-
`ally. For example, the
`vith Atypical Features
`
`iis exclusion criterion
`
`n presentation occurs
`dementia is not diag-
`rsion Disorder is not
`hisorder; Bulimia Ner-
`ades of Anorexia Ner-
`i which the symptoms
`2toms of the preempt-
`il remission as part of
`ie excluded diagnosis
`ven the excludingdis-
`
`‘e.g., a drug of abuse,
`ision criterion is used
`ology must be consid-
`.2., Major Depressive
`‘stance use and a gen-
`
`3 used to indicate that
`in the differential di-
`andary cases,clinical
`vides the most appro-
`section of the text for
`
`moses to be assigned
`M-IV disorder. There
`teria help to establish
`to highlight differen-
`ignoses):
`
`tion or a Substance-
`:s the diagnosisof the
`.g., Cocaine-Induced
`‘h cases, an exclusion
`logical effects of...”
`
`among its defining
`mptomsofa less per-
`ving three exclusion
`der, indicating that
`ave never been met
`clusively during the
`
`» Whenthereare particularly difficult differential diagnostic boundaries, the phrase
`“not better accounted for by...” is included to indicate that clinical judgment is
`necessary to determine which diagnosis is most appropriate. For example, Panic
`Disorder With Agoraphobia includes the criterion “not better accounted for by
`Social Phobia” and Social Phobia includes the criterion “not better accounted for
`by Panic Disorder With Agoraphobia”in recognition of the fact thatthis is a par-
`ticularly difficult boundary to draw.
`In some cases, both diagnoses might be
`appropriate.
`
`criteria for Substance-Induced Disorders
`
`It is often difficult to determine whether presenting symptomatology is substance in-
`duced, that is, the direct physiological consequence of Substance Intoxication or
`Withdrawal, medication use, or toxin exposure. In an effort to provide someassis-
`tance in making this determination, the twocriteria listed below have been added to
`each of the Substance-Induced Disorders. These criteria are intended to provide gen-
`eral guidelines, but at the same time allow forclinical judgment in determining
`whetheror not the presenting symptoms are best accounted for by the direct physio-
`logical effects of the substance. For further discussion ofthis issue, see p. 209.
`
`ne.
`
`B. There is evidence from the history, physical examination, or laboratory
`findings ofeither (1) or (2):
`
`(1)
`
`the symptoms developed during, or within a month of, Substance
`Intoxication or Withdrawal
`(2) medication use is etiologically related to the disturbance
`
`C. The disturbance is not better accounted for by a disorderthat is not sub-
`stance induced. Evidence that the symptoms are better accounted for by a
`disorder that is not substance induced might include the following: the
`symptoms precede the onset of the substance use (or medication use); the
`symptoms persistfor a substantial period oftime(e.g., about a month)after
`the cessation of acute withdrawal orsevere intoxication, or are substantial-
`ly in excess of what would be expected giventhe type, duration, or amount
`of the substance used;or there is other evidence that suggests the existence
`of an independent non-substance-induced disorder(e.g., a history of recur-
`rent non-substance-related episodes).
`
`Criteria for a Mental Disorder Due to a
`General Medical Condition
`
`Thecriterion listed below is necessary to establish the etiological requirement for
`each of the Mental Disorders Due to a General Medical Condition (e.g., Mood Disor-
`der Due to Hypothyroidism). For further discussion ofthis issue, see p. 181.
`There is evidence from the history, physical examination,or laboratory find-
`ings that the disturbanceis the direct physiological consequence of a general
`medical condition.
`
`
`
`10 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`10 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`

`

`Criteria for Clinical Significance
`
`Use of the Manual
`
`Types of Information in the DSM-IV Text
`The text of DSM-IV systematically describes each disorder underthe following head-
`ings: “Diagnostic Features”; “Subtypes and/or Specifiers”; “Recording Procedures”;
`“Associated Features and Disorders”; “Specific Culture, Age, and Gender Features”;
`“Prevalence”; “Course”; “Familial Pattern”; and “Differential Diagnosis.” When no
`information is available for a section, that section is not included. In someinstances,
`when manyof the specific disorders in a group of disorders share commonfeatures,
`this information is included in the general introduction to the group.
`
`Diagnostic Features. This section clarifies the diagnostic criteria and often provides
`illustrative examples.
`
`Subtypes and/or Specifiers. This section provides definitions and brief discussions
`concerning applicable subtypes and/or specifiers.
`
`Recording Procedures. This section provides guidelines for reporting the name of
`the disorder and for selecting and recording the appropriate ICD-9-CM diagnostic
`code. It also includes instructions for applying any appropriate subtypes and/or
`specifiers.
`
`Associated Features and Disorders. This section is usually subdivided into three
`parts:
`
`Thedefinition of mental disorder in the introduction to DSM-IV requires that there be
`clinically significant impairmentor distress. To highlight the importanceof consider-
`ing this issue, the criteria sets for most disorders includea clinical significancecrite-
`rion (usually worded “.. . causesclinically significant distress or impairmentin social,
`occupational, or other importantareas of functioning”). This criterion helps establish
`the threshold for the diagnosis of a disorderin those situations in which the symp-
`tomatic presentation byitself (particularly in its milder forms) is not inherently
`pathological and may be encounteredin individuals for whom a diagnosis of "mental
`disorder” would be inappropriate. Assessing whetherthis criterion is met, especially
`in terms of role function, is an inherently difficult clinical judgment. Reliance on in-
`formation from family members and other third parties (in addition to the individual)
`regarding the individual’s performanceis often necessary.
`
`disorder in question (e.g., Alcohol-Induced Persisting Dementia is a consequence
`
`© Associated descriptive features and mental disorders, This section includesclinical
`features that are frequently associated with the disorder but that are not consid-
`ered essential to making the diagnosis. In some cases, these features were consid-
`ered for inclusion as possible diagnosticcriteria but were insufficiently sensitive or
`specific to be includedin the final criteria set. Also noted in this section are other
`mental disorders associated with the disorder being discussed. It is specified
`(when known)if these disorders precede, co-occur with,or are consequences ofthe
`
`11 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`11 of 146
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1022
`
`

`

`Use of the Manual
`
`Use of the Manual
`
`9
`
`‘quiresthat there be
`ortanceof consider-
`al significancecrite-
`npairment in social,
`‘rion helpsestablish
`in which the symp-
`3)
`is not inherently
`liagnosis of “mental
`on is met, especially
`ent. Reliance on in-
`m to the individual)
`
`V Text
`
`the following head-
`ding Procedures”;
`| GenderFeatures”;
`agnosis.” When no
`. In some instances,
`2 commonfeatures,
`‘up.
`
`andoften provides
`
`id brief discussions
`
`vorting the name of
`D-9-CMdiagnostic
`> subtypes and/or
`
`divided into three
`
`n includesclinical
`nat are not consid-
`tures wereconsid-
`ciently sensitive or
`is Section are other
`ied. It
`is specified
`onsequences ofthe
`a is a consequence
`
`of chronic Alcohol Dependence).If available, information on predisposing factors
`and complications is also included in this section.
`Associated laboratory findings. This section provides information onthree typesof
`laboratory findings that may be associated with the disorder: 1) those associated
`laboratory findings that are consideredto be “diagnostic” of the disorder—for ex-
`ample, polysomnographic findings in certain sleep disorders; 2) those associated
`laboratory findingsthatare not considered to be diagnosticofthe disorder but that
`have been noted to be abnormal in groupsofindividuals with the disorder relative
`to control subjects—for example, ventricle size on computed tomographyas a val-
`idator of the construct of Schizophrenia; and 3) those laboratory findings that are
`associated with the complications of a disorder—for example, electrolyte imbal-
`ances in individuals with Anorexia Nervosa.
`« Associated physical examinationfindings and general medical conditions. This section
`includes information about symptoms elicited by history, or findings noted during
`physical examination, that may be ofdiagnostic significance butthat are not essen-
`tial to the diagnosis—for example, dental erosion in Bulimia Nervosa. Also includ-
`ed are those disorders that are coded outside the “Mental and Behavioural
`Disorders” chapter of ICD that are associated with the disorder being discussed.
`As is done for associated mental disorders, the type of association(i.e., precedes,
`co-occurs with, is a consequenceof) is specified if known—for example,that cir-
`thosis is a consequence of Alcohol] Dependence.
`
`Specific Culture, Age, and Gender Features. This section provides guidance for
`the clinician concerning variations in the presentationof the disorder that maybe at-
`tributable to the individual's cultural setting, developmental stage (e.g., infancy,
`childhood, adolescence, adulthood,late life), or gender. This section also includes in-
`formation on differential prevalenceratesrelated to culture, age, and gender(e.g., sex
`ratio).
`
`Prevalence. This section provides available data on point andlifetime prevalence,
`incidence, andlifetime risk. These data are provided for differentsettings (e.g., com-
`munity, primary care, outpatient mental health clinics, and inpatient psychiatric set-
`tings) whenthis informati

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket