throbber
2002 ANNUAL MEETING
`
` AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION
`
`
`
`Philadelphia, PA @ May 18-23, 2002
`
`1 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1007
`
`1 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1007
`
`

`

`haloperidol, IM ziprasidone was consistently associated with a
`lower movement disorder burden (eg, akathisia, dystonia, EPS,
`hypertonia)atall doses investigated.In all studies,clinically signifi-
`cant changesin blood pressure and heart rate associated with
`IM ziprasidone were isolated and transient; treatment-emergent
`postural hypotension was observed in one ziprasidone-treated
`patient in one study. There were no QTc values >500 msecwith
`IM ziprasidone.
`Conclusion:In clinical trials, IM ziprasidone in divided doses up
`to 80 mg/day was well tolerated, with low incidences of AE-related
`discontinuations and movement disorder AEs.
`
`Results: Aripiprazole producedstatistically significant improve-
`ments in Y-MRSTotal score (-8.15 vs. —3.35, p<0.01) compared
`to placebo. The responserate wassignificantly higherin the aripi-
`prazole group than the placebo group (40%vs. 19%, p<0.01). For
`all efficacy variables, aripiprazole separated from placebo by day
`4. Discontinuations due to adverse events did not differ between
`the aripiprazole and placebo groups, and there were nosignificant
`changesin weight versus placebo.
`Conclusion: Aripiprazole was effective and well tolerated in the
`treatment of acute mania in patients with bipolar disorderin this
`randomized, placebo-controlledtrial.
`
`Wednesday, May 22, 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.
`NR313
`Olanzapine Improves Tardive Dyskinesia in Patients
`with Schizophrenia
`Bruce J. Kinon, M.D., Lilly Research Lab, Eli Lilly And
`Company,Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285,
`Virginia L. Stauffer, Pharm.D., Lynn Wang, M.S., Khanhn T. Thi
`Summary:
`Objective: We report preliminary findings of the effects of olan-
`zapine (OLZ) treatment upon tardive dyskinesia TD.
`Methods: Eligible schizophrenic subjects met restricted Re-
`search Diagnosis Tardive Dyskinesia criteria (restricted RD-TD)
`that specified for abnormal involuntary movements to be of at
`least moderate severity. Subjects received OLZ, 5-20 mg/day
`for 8 months within a double-blind design that included up to 2
`medication reduction (75%) periods of 2 weeks duration. TD was
`assessed with the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)
`and psychopathology with the Positive and Negative Syndrome
`Scale (PANSS).
`Results: A significant reduction in mean AIMS Total score was
`demonstrated (N=95; BL=11.9; EP=7.5; p<.001; LOCF). Nearly
`70%of subjects no longer met the restricted RD-TDcriteria after
`up to 8 monthsof treatment, with greater than 50% improving as
`early as 8 weeks. Nostatistically significant rebound worsening
`of TD was found during the blinded drug reduction periods. A
`significant improvement in the PANSS occurred (BL=68.2; EP=
`59.7; p<.001, LOCF).
`Conclusion: These data, suggesting an ameliorative, rather than
`masking effect, and the concurrent further improvementin clinical
`status suggests that OLZ mayoffer a potential treatment alterna-
`tive for managing the schizophrenic patient with pre-existing TD.
`
`Wednesday, May 22, 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.
`NR314
`Aripiprazole Versus Placebo in Acute Mania
`Paul E. Keck, Jr., M.D., Biological Psychiatry Department, Univ.
`of Cincinnatti College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way,
`ML559, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0559, Anutosh R. Saha, Ph.D.,
`Taro Iwamoto, Ph.D., Darlene Jody, M.D., Stavros
`Tourkodimitris, Ph.D., Donald G. Archibald, M.Phil., Ronald N.
`Marcus, M.D.
`
`Summary:
`Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole,
`the first next-generation atypical antipsychotic with a unique mech-
`anism of action (dopamine-serotonin system stabilizer) to placebo
`in patients with acute bipolar mania.
`Methods: This PhaseIll, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-
`controlled study randomized 262 patients with acute mania to
`aripiprazole 30 mg (reduced to 15 mg if unable to tolerate) or
`placebo for 3 weeks. Patients remained hospitalized for a mini-
`mum of two weeksof the treatment phase. The primary measure
`of efficacy was the change in Y-MRS Total score. Response was
`defined as a decrease of >50%in Y-MRS Total score.
`
`Wednesday, May 22, 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.
`NR315
`Ziprasidone Versus Olanzapine in Schizophrenia:
`Six-Month Continuation Study
`George M. Simpson, M.D., Department of Psychiatry, LAC/
`USMC Medical Center, 2020 Zonal Avenue, IRD Room 20, Los
`Angeles, CA 90033; Peter J. Weiden, M.D., Teresa A. Pigott,
`M.D., Steven J. Romano, M.D., Cynthia Siu, Ph.D.
`Summary:
`Objective: To compare long-term efficacy and tolerability of zi-
`prasidone and olanzapine in schizophrenia or schizoaffective dis-
`order.
`Methods: This 6-month, blinded continuation study followed
`hospitalized patients who had completed a 6-week randomized
`trial with satisfactory clinical response (CGI-| <2 or >20%reduction
`in symptom severity by PANSS Total) and were discharged on
`olanzapine 5-15 mg QD (n=71) or ziprasidone 40-80 mg BID (n=
`62). Primary efficacy measures were BPRS and CGI-S; secondary
`variables included PANSSTotal and Positive and Negative Sub-
`scale scores. Tolerability assessments includedfastinglipids, in-
`sulin, glucose, and weight.
`Results: Ziprasidone- and olanzapine-treated patients demon-
`strated comparable changes in BPRS, CGI-S, and PANSSTotal
`and Subscale scores from baseline of 6-week study to endpoint
`of 6-month continuation. Changes during continuation phase did
`not differ significantly between groups. Olanzapine-treated pa-
`tients exhibited significant mean increases versus ziprasidonein
`endpoint weight (P<0.001) and BMI (P=0.001), and significant
`median increases versus baseline in LDL-C (P<0.01),
`insulin
`(P<0.05), glucose (P=0.05), and fasting liver enzymes (P<0.05).
`Both agents displayed low incidence of movementdisorders. No
`patients had QTc 2500 msec.
`Conclusions: Ziprasidone and olanzapine demonstrated com-
`parable antipsychotic efficacy in long-term treatment. Olanzapine
`patients alone exhibited sustained weight gain and deleterious
`metabolic changes.
`
`Wednesday, May 22, 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m.
`NR316
`Antipsychotic Monotherapy Versus Combination
`Treatment with Valporate in Hospitalized Patients
`with Acute Schizophrenia: A Double-Blind, Multi-
`Center Study
`Leslie L. Citrome, M.D., Clinical Research/CREF, Nathan Kline
`Institute, 140 Old Orangeburg Road, Building 37, Orangeburg,
`NY 10962-2210, David G. Daniel, M.D., Adel A. Wassef, M.D.,
`Katherine A. Tracy, M.D., Patricia Wozniak, Ph.D., Daniel E.
`Casey, M.D.
`Summary:
`Objective: This study comparedthe efficacy and safety of atypi-
`cal antipsychotic monotherapy (olanzapine or risperidone) versus
`combination treatment with valproate (divalproex sodium) in pa-
`tients with an acute episode of schizophrenia.
`
`86
`
`2 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1007
`
`2 of 2
`
`Alkermes, Ex. 1007
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket