`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper No. 7
`Entered: February 21, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`INTEL CORPORATION, GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC.,
`AND MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`DANIEL L. FLAMM,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases: IPR2017-00279 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00280 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00281 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00282 (Patent RE40,264 E) 1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JO-ANNE M. KOKOSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Petitioners’ Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Jared Bobrow and Chad S. Campbell
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This Order addresses identical issues in each of four related cases. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be entered in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading in their papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00279 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00280 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00281 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00282 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`
`
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioners’ unopposed motions for pro hac vice
`admission of Mr. Jared Bobrow and Mr. Chad S. Campbell are granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bobrow and Mr. Campbell are
`authorized to represent Petitioners as back-up counsel only;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bobrow and Mr. Campbell are to
`comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of
`Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal
`Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bobrow and Mr. Campbell are
`subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a),
`and the USPTO’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`PETITIONER:
`Jonathan McFarland
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`Intel-Flamm-Service-IPR@perkinscoie.com
`micron.flamm.service@weil.com
`WCGlobalFoundries-FlammTeam@whitecase.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Christopher Frerking
`chris@ntknet.com
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`