`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INTEL CORPORATION, GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC.,
`AND MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`DANIEL L. FLAMM,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00280
`
`Patent RE40,264 E
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`OF CHAD S. CAMPBELL UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Chad S. Campbell
`
`Petitioners Intel Corporation, GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC.,
`
`and Micron Technology, Inc. (collectively “Petitioners”) respectfully request that
`
`the Board admit Chad S. Campbell as backup counsel pro hac vice in this
`
`proceeding. Mr. Campbell is an experienced litigation attorney and has substantial
`
`knowledge in the substantive issues of the invalidity of the challenged claims of
`
`the Patent in this proceeding. Therefore, Mr. Campbell meets the requirements of
`
`“an experienced litigating attorney and has an established familiarity with the
`
`subject matter at issue in the proceeding” under 37 C.F.R. §42.10(c).
`
`1. Time For Filing
`
`
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission has been authorized by the Notice
`
`of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary
`
`Response that was mailed on December 14, 2016 (Paper 3). This Motion is filed
`
`no sooner than twenty one (21) days after service of the petition.
`
`2.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`
`
`In this proceeding, lead counsel for Petitioner is Jonathan McFarland, a
`
`registered practitioner. The following statement of facts shows that there is good
`
`cause for the Board to admit Mr. Campbell pro hac vice.
`
`
`
`Mr. Campbell is a patent litigation attorney with more than 23 years of
`
`experience representing clients in cases involving semiconductor technology,
`
`1
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Chad S. Campbell
`
`computer design and software. (Affidavit of Chad S. Campbell (“Campbell
`
`Affidavit”), ¶ 8 in Exhibit 1022.)
`
`
`
`Mr. Campbell regularly litigates patent cases in various forums including
`
`the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and various federal
`
`district courts. (Id.) He has experience representing clients in many phases of
`
`litigation including discovery, Markman hearings, jury trials, and appeals. (Id.)
`
`Mr. Campbell’s biography is attached to the Campbell Affidavit (Exhibit 1022) as
`
`Appendix A.
`
`
`
`Mr. Campbell has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue
`
`in this proceeding, having represented Petitioner in a court proceeding against
`
`Patent Owner involving the same technology (Daniel L. Flamm v. Intel
`
`Corporation, 16-cv-1579 (N.D. Cal.)).
`
`
`
`Mr. Campbell is familiar with the technologies and issued claims in the
`
`6,017,221, RE40,264 and 5,711,849 Patents. Mr. Campbell is also familiar with
`
`the prior art references cited in PTAB Case Nos IPR2017-00279 - 282, IPR2017-
`
`00391- 392 and IPR2017-00406 and the associated invalidity grounds before the
`
`PTAB.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Chad S. Campbell
`
`3. Affidavit or Declaration of Individual Seeking to Appear
`
`
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by an Affidavit of
`
`Mr. Campbell (Exhibit 1022), which attests to the requirements for pro hac vice
`
`admission set forth in IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, dated Oct. 15, 2013.
`
`4. Conclusion
`
`
`
`Accordingly, Petitioners submit that there is good cause under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.10(c) for the Board to admit Chad S. Campbell as counsel pro hac vice and to
`
`authorize Mr. Campbell to represent Petitioners as back-up counsel in this
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` /Jonathan McFarland/
`Lead Counsel
`Jonathan McFarland, Reg. No. 61,109
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Chad Campbell, Pro Hac Vice
`Tyler Bowen, Reg. No. 60,461
`Daniel Keese, Reg. No. 69,315
`Jeremy Jason Lang, Reg. No. 73,604
`Jared Bobrow, Pro Hac Vice
`David M. Tennant, Reg. No. 48,362
`Nathan Zhang, Reg. No. 71,401
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`3
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 20, 2017
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
`Seattle, WA 98101
`206-359-8000
`
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`650-802-3237
`
`WHITE & CASE LLP
`701 Thirteenth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20005-3807
`202-626-3600
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Chad S. Campbell
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION UNDER 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and Exhibit 1022 was served in its entirety this 20th day of
`
`January 2017 by FedEx® mail delivery service on Patent Owner at the
`
`correspondence address for the ’264 Patent shown in USPTO PAIR:
`
`Daniel L. Flamm
`476 Green View Drive
`Walnut Creek CA 94596
`
`The above referenced documents were additionally served by FedEx® mail
`
`
`
`delivery service to the following address known as likely to effect service:
`
`George C. Summerfield
`Rolf O. Stadheim
`Robert M. Spalding
`STANDHEIM & GREAR, LTD.
`400 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2200
`Chicago, IL 60611
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Chad S. Campbell
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` /Jonathan McFarland/
`Lead Counsel
`Jonathan McFarland, Reg. No. 61,109
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Chad Campbell, Pro Hac Vice
`Tyler Bowen, Reg. No. 60,461
`Daniel Keese, Reg. No. 69,315
`Jeremy Jason Lang, Reg. No. 73,604
`Jared Bobrow, Pro Hac Vice
`David M. Tennant, Reg. No. 48,362
`Nathan Zhang, Reg. No. 71,401
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`2
`
`
`
`Dated: January 20, 2017
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
`Seattle, WA 98101
`206-359-8000
`
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`650-802-3237
`
`WHITE & CASE LLP
`701 Thirteenth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20005-3807
`202-626-3600