`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 8
`Filed: February 28, 2017
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00261
`Patent 6,757,717
`____________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`PAPER 7 AND EXHIBIT 2005
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Proxyconn,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“Proxyconn” or “Patent Owner”)
`
`respectfully requests the Board to authorize the filing under seal of Paper 7, Patent
`
`Owner’s Preliminary Response, and Exhibit 2005, which was submitted with the
`
`Preliminary Response. A public, redacted version of the Preliminary Response is
`
`being filed concurrently as Paper 6.
`
` Good cause exists for sealing Exhibit 2005. Exhibit 2005 is a Tolling
`
`Agreement that was entered into between Proxyconn and the defendants in
`
`Proxyconn, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., et al., Civil Action No. SA CV11-1681 (C.D.
`
`Cal.). Proxyconn is contractually obligated to maintain the terms of the Tolling
`
`Agreement as confidential and may suffer legal consequences if it publicly
`
`discloses those terms. (See Ex. 2005, ¶¶ 14-15.) Proxyconn owes those
`
`contractual obligations to Microsoft, and to other parties to Exhibit 2005 that are
`
`not parties to this IPR.
`
`Good cause also exists for sealing the portions of Paper 7 that are redacted
`
`from Paper 6. The limited portions of Paper 6 that are redacted are those that
`
`disclose specific terms of Exhibit 2005.
`
`In addition, the public’s interest in having access to the redacted information
`
`is minimal, if any. While the precise terms of Exhibit 2005 are redacted from
`
`Paper 6, Paper 6 explains the intent and the legal effects of Exhibit 2005 in
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`sufficient detail for the interested members of the public to understand the
`
`arguments made in the Preliminary Response.
`
`
`
`In sum, good cause exists to seal the redacted information, so that Patent
`
`Owner may comply with its contractual obligations to Microsoft and to third
`
`parties.
`
`Patent Owner certifies that it has conferred with John D. Vandenberg,
`
`Petitioner’s counsel in an effort to come to an agreement regarding this motion.
`
`Mr. Vandenberg indicated on February 28, 2017 that Petitioner does not oppose
`
`this Motion to Seal.
`
`Patent Owner proposes entry of the default protective order found in
`
`Appendix B of the Trial Practice Guide.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`Dated: February 28, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Neil A. Rubin
`
`Amir Naini (Reg. No. 45,770)
`Neil A. Rubin (Reg. No. 67,030)
`Russ August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Phone: (310) 826-7474
`Fax: (310) 826-6991
`anaini@raklaw.com
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(1))
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the above document was served on
`February 28, 2017, by filing this document through the Patent Review Processing
`System as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail upon the following
`attorneys of record for the Petitioner:
`
`
`John D. Vandenberg, Reg. No. 31,312
`Andrew M. Mason, Reg. No. 64,034
`Klarquist Sparkman, LLP
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`andrew.mason@klarquist.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Neil A. Rubin
`
`Amir Naini (Reg. No. 45,770)
`Neil A. Rubin (Reg. No. 67,030)
`Russ August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Fl.
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Phone: (310) 826-7474
`Fax: (310) 826-6991
`anaini@raklaw.com
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`Date: February 28, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`
`Exhibit A
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Standing Protective Order
`
`This standing protective order governs the treatment and filing of
`
`confidential information, including documents and testimony.
`
`1. Confidential information shall be clearly marked ‘‘PROTECTIVE
`
`ORDER MATERIAL.’’
`
`2. Access to confidential information is limited to the following individuals
`
`who have executed the acknowledgment appended to this order:
`
`(A) Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the
`
`proceeding and other persons who are named parties to the proceeding.
`
`(B) Party Representatives. Representatives of record for a party in the
`
`proceeding.
`
`(C) Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding who further
`
`certify in the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor to any party,
`
`or a consultant for, or employed by, such a competitor with respect to the
`
`subject matter of the proceeding.
`
`(D) In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`(E) Other Employees of a Party. Employees, consultants or other
`
`persons performing work for a party, other than in-house counsel and in-
`
`house counsel’s support staff, who sign the Acknowledgement shall be
`
`extended access to confidential information only upon agreement of the
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`parties or by order of the Board upon a motion brought by the party seeking
`
`to disclose confidential information to that person. The party opposing
`
`disclosure to that person shall have the burden of proving that such person
`
`should be restricted from access to confidential information.
`
`(F) The Office. Employees and representatives of the Office who have
`
`a need for access to the confidential information shall have such access
`
`without the requirement to sign an Acknowledgement. Such employees and
`
`representatives shall include the Director, members of the Board and their
`
`clerical staff, other support personnel, court reporters, and other persons
`
`acting on behalf of the Office.
`
`(G) Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff, court
`
`reporters and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who are
`
`reasonably necessary to assist those persons in the proceeding shall not be
`
`required to sign an Acknowledgement, but shall be informed of the terms
`
`and requirements of the Protective Order by the person they are supporting
`
`who receives confidential information.
`
`3. Persons receiving confidential information shall use reasonable efforts to
`
`maintain the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`(A) Maintaining such information in a secure location to which
`
`persons not authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`(B) Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality
`
`of the information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those the
`
`recipient uses to maintain the confidentiality of information not received
`
`from the disclosing party;
`
`(C) Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have access
`
`to the confidential information understand and abide by the obligation to
`
`maintain the confidentiality of information received that is designated as
`
`confidential; and
`
`(D) Limiting the copying of confidential information to a reasonable
`
`number of copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and maintaining a
`
`record of the locations of such copies.
`
`4. Persons receiving confidential information shall use the following
`
`procedures to maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
`(A) Documents and Information Filed With the Board.
`
`(i) A party may file documents or information with the Board
`
`under seal, together with a non-confidential description of the nature
`
`of the confidential information that is under seal and the reasons why
`
`the information is confidential and should not be made available to the
`
`public. The submission shall be treated as confidential and remain
`
`under seal, unless, upon motion of a party and after a hearing on the
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`issue, or sua sponte, the Board determines that the documents or
`
`information do not to qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of the
`
`information submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall file
`
`confidential and non-confidential versions of its submission, together
`
`with a Motion to Seal the confidential version setting forth the reasons
`
`why the information redacted from the non-confidential version is
`
`confidential and should not be made available to the public. The
`
`nonconfidential version of the submission shall clearly indicate the
`
`locations of information that has been redacted. The confidential
`
`version of the submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted
`
`information shall remain under seal unless, upon motion of a party
`
`and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte, the Board determines
`
`that some or all of the redacted information does not qualify for
`
`confidential treatment.
`
`(B) Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties.
`
`Information designated as confidential that is disclosed to another party
`
`during discovery or other proceedings before the Board shall be clearly
`
`marked as ‘‘PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL’’ and shall be produced in
`
`a manner that maintains its confidentiality.
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`(j) Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order. The following form may be
`
`used to acknowledge a protective order and gain access to information covered by
`
`the protective order:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00261
`Patent 6,757,717
`____________
`
`
`Standard Acknowledgment for Access to Protective Order Material
`
`I ____________________, affirm that I have read the Protective Order; that
`
`
`
`
`
`I will abide by its terms; that I will use the confidential information only in
`
`connection with this proceeding and for no other purpose; that I will only allow
`
`access to support staff who are reasonably necessary to assist me in this
`
`proceeding; that prior to any disclosure to such support staff I informed or will
`
`inform them of the requirements of the Protective Order; that I am personally
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`responsible for the requirements of the terms of the Protective Order and I agree to
`
`submit to the jurisdiction of the Office and the United States District Court for the
`
`Eastern District of Virginia for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective
`
`Order and providing remedies for its breach.
`
`
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`11
`
`