throbber
Case 8:11-cv-01681-DOC-JPR Document 108 Filed 01/08/13 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:1052
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`Marc A. Fenster, SBN 181067
`Email: mfenster@raklaw.com
`Bruce D. Kuyper, SBN 144969
`Email: bkuyper@raklaw.com
`Andrew D. Weiss, SBN 232974
`Email: aweiss@raklaw.com
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Tel: (310) 826-7474
`Fax: (310) 826-6991
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Proxyconn, Inc.
`
`KARIN G. PAGNANELLI (SBN
`174763)
`kgp@msk.com
`MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP
`LLP
`11377 West Olympic Boulevard
`Los Angeles, California 90064-1683
`Telephone: (310) 312-2000
`Facsimile:
`(310) 312-3100
`
`STEPHEN J. JONCUS (pro hac vice)
`stephen.joncus@klarquist.com
`SALUMEH R. LOESCH (pro hac vice)
`salumeh.loesch@klarquist.com
`JOHN D. VANDENBERG (pro hac vice)
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`121 SW Salmon Street, Suite 1600
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Microsoft
`Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company,
`Dell Inc., and Acer America Corporation
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`
`JOINT REQUEST FOR A STATUS CONFERENCE AND REPORT
`
`Patent Owner, Ex. 2003, Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 8:11-cv-01681-DOC-JPR Document 108 Filed 01/08/13 Page 2 of 5 Page ID #:1053
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. SACV11-1681 DOC
`(JPRx)
`
`CONSOLIDATED
`
`JOINT REQUEST FOR A STATUS
`CONFERENCE AND REPORT
`
`The Honorable David O. Carter
`
`Courtroom: 9D
`
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et
`al.,
`
`
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT REQUEST FOR A STATUS CONFERENCE AND REPORT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`
`Patent Owner, Ex. 2003, Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 8:11-cv-01681-DOC-JPR Document 108 Filed 01/08/13 Page 3 of 5 Page ID #:1054
`
`The Parties1 hereby provide a report on the pending inter partes review
`(“IPReview”) and request a status conference with the Court.
`
`On September 18, 2012, Microsoft filed a Petition for IPReview with the
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark's Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”)
`
`seeking inter partes review of nine claims of the patent-in-suit. Inter partes review
`
`is a new administrative procedure that first became available under the America
`
`Invents Act (35 U.S.C. §§ 311-19) on September 16, 2012. (See Dkt. 90.)
`
`On November 2, 2012, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation Requesting Stay
`
`of Case Pending Inter Partes Review (the “IPR Stay Stipulation”). (Id.)
`
`On December 21, 2012, the PTAB agreed to institute an inter partes review
`
`on claims 1, 3, 10, 22, 23, and 24 as requested by Microsoft but declined to
`
`institute an inter partes review of claims 11, 12 and 14.
`
`On January 3, 2013, Microsoft filed in the PTAB a motion for rehearing of
`
`the PTAB’s decision denying inter partes review of claims 11, 12 and 14.
`
`On January 11, 2013, Microsoft expects to file a new request for inter partes
`
`review asserting prior art against claims 11, 12 and 14 as well as additional claims
`
`6, 7, and 9. As part of that new request, Microsoft will move to consolidate the
`
`new request for inter partes review with the original request.
`
`The Parties continue to agree that a stay is still appropriate while the inter
`
`partes review is pending and request that the Court enter the IPR Stay Stipulation.
`
`The IPReview will simplify, or outright resolve, at least some of the issues in this
`
`case. For example, the IPReview will likely resolve Defendants’ invalidity
`
`allegations based on the prior art. Under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) (2011), after a final
`
`written decision from an IPReview, a petitioner “may not assert…in a civil
`
`action…that the claim is invalid on any ground that the petition raised or
`
`1 Plaintiff Proxyconn, Inc. (“Proxyconn”) and Defendants Microsoft Corporation
`(“Microsoft”), Hewlett-Packard Company, Acer America Corporation, and Dell
`Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) (Proxyconn and Defendants collectively, the
`“Parties”)
`
`
` 1
`JOINT REQUEST FOR A STATUS CONFERENCE AND REPORT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`5064552.1
`
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`
`Patent Owner, Ex. 2003, Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 8:11-cv-01681-DOC-JPR Document 108 Filed 01/08/13 Page 4 of 5 Page ID #:1055
`
`reasonably could have raised during the inter partes review.” In the IPR Stay
`
`Stipulation, all Defendants have agreed to be estopped in this action to the same
`
`extent that Microsoft becomes estopped by a PTAB written decision under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) (2011). Thus, the estoppel effect of the PTAB decision
`
`resulting from the IPReview will apply to all parties thereby reducing the issues to
`
`be addressed in the litigation.
`
`In light of the proceedings in the PTAB, the Parties request a status
`
`conference to discuss how best to proceed with the case in light of the proceedings
`
`in the PTAB.
`
`Dated: January 8, 2013
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Andrew D. Weiss (w/ permission)
`Andrew D. Weiss
`
`Marc A. Fenster, State Bar No. 181067
`Andrew D. Weiss, State Bar No. 232974
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90025
`Tel: (310) 826-7474
`Fax: (310) 826-6991
`Email: mfenster@raklaw.com
`Email: aweiss@raklaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Proxyconn, Inc.
`
`By: /s/ Karin G. Pagnanelli
`Karin G. Pagnanelli
`
`KARIN G. PAGNANELLI
`MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
`
`STEPHEN J. JONCUS
`SALUMEH R. LOESCH
`JOHN D. VANDENBERG
`KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`Microsoft Corporation, Hewlett-Packard
`Company, Dell Inc., and Acer America
`Corporation
`
` 2
`JOINT REQUEST FOR A STATUS CONFERENCE AND REPORT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`5064552.1
`
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`
`Patent Owner, Ex. 2003, Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 8:11-cv-01681-DOC-JPR Document 108 Filed 01/08/13 Page 5 of 5 Page ID #:1056
`
`Attestation Regarding Signatures
`
`I, Karin G. Pagnanelli, attest that all signatories listed, and on whose behalf
`
`the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
`
`DATED: January 8, 2013
`
` /s/ Karin G. Pagnanelli
`Karin G. Pagnanelli
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`
`
` 3
`JOINT REQUEST FOR A STATUS CONFERENCE AND REPORT
`
`5064552.1
`
`Patent Owner, Ex. 2003, Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket