`
`5F¥‘r».3E3Z11—5O8417
`
`{4}
`
`FIG. 4B
`
`4aCD1 ? ~y 7"42B7b‘ 5
`
`fifiEfi%#
`
`
`
`Cfl 35i'(.}‘I‘}E|Jf1E’&
`‘D137-1.»./\i5§%>
`
`
`
`
`
` HaT‘fliEC/I Y§§UE1E:&U
`
`
`
`fifi I Ziflllfi-2”‘fI'§ ‘E
`‘L’ X 5‘ A /\ ii 7;;
`
`4aCD
`X '7' ‘y 7414’\
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 520
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 520
`
`
`
`~‘F|Jfi§EIfiE>Zs:
`NE|l1fi:‘3EiEU)
`HEfi%E%E?§
`
`%fl»“F‘.7$5E1§E"Ffi
`Méfliflfiiiifi E
`53U"1='_'T 5
`
`&7tab%%T&
`U>7§%%«fi5
`
`‘J lz '7 '§1§1§fJ‘ '5
`7‘E|Ji$1:’§$"é"‘s'i"I§‘d'<5
`B L» < ld:flH‘§T’&
`§Z‘1’.%‘T %»
`
`514
`
`§zTE;C/|’5:7E?'5
`
`'F=i%¥'1 1-508-117
`
`FIG. 5
`
`3F:3$0D
`:1? 7:6 L \$f§fi§
`E|J1fl’2‘33£‘$EEfl‘?
`
`a'%’J»‘3F$iE5lEfEfifi
`EUMESE ’&
`5&0/lEIJfll§5i$J‘£
`9: SEQ T 5
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 521
`
`DBH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 521
`
`
`
`'F=i%¥'1 1-508-117
`
`WK? #3 L < Ii
`ifillfi
`§4?fivt—§
`€"?.‘T§?5
`
`fifwiflfifiififl)
`I’E:7fl|JE L» T
`5Fi’5J*f|.'.‘6'§
`
`Mamamm
`‘*}‘7t",' #03
`mmwiur
`
`m%@
`1 F “J 7632/\
`
`_
`.
`V1T*?5
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 522
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 522
`
`
`
`'»?%"fi%¥1 1-508-117
`
`saw} 77‘ '7 763041‘)
`
`Bad)
`x -7* -2 7622’\
`
`fifiéntflmmflm
`¥%m¢m
`Efltflfiiiifi EEO £7‘ 6
`
`C/I
`lat b 3 l.“IE
`ivfifimfl
`?
`
`Ellflifiififii
`E ‘:21 27- lax
`iEf§T€>
`
`fl6a®
`1 :7‘ -y 7622r\
`
`Emit:
`fifiéflftah‘
`'?
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 523
`
`DBH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 523
`
`
`
`'F=i%¥'1 1-508-117
`
`FIG. 7
`
`E'Hfl'i3.3$7'E£?E$E
`)‘ '7 ‘[2 — ‘7/“
`>E'i£f§TI<'>
`
`33}? L T:
`E|J#Hi£:3E E €121’
`flmfifiv
`?
`
`‘U’ 7-1:’ :1 F
`$2 L < I;
`E'J1fii£5E'§‘v’.'%
`)4 -y 11- ‘)7
`’&i3E1§'§‘§>
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 524
`
`DBH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 524
`
`
`
`'F=§E¥'11—'508-41
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`
`A. CJASSI FIGKTIGN
`IFC 5
`H040 ,'?55""E'“Th'é‘3fl§'."/05
`
`Acmrdirq La lnmrnlumal Falznl Gamficxhm (IPC) or us: both nuuonal clasnficunou Ind [PC
`B, FIELDS SEARCHED
`Mnumum aoeummunm xcu-chtd. (clunifinnon system ft-llnuvzd by dasslhclllon ayrnbvla)
`IPC 6
`H340
`H0-EL
`
`Imam-'
`
`‘El Amllclicn N0
`
`PC1,.~;E 95/99314
`
`Duumcnlalwll Ilrthell III‘-‘Ir Ihan lmnlmun documcnuuar. to the exam ma! Iltll cbchmenls an Induce :11 U1: fmlus scardnen
`
`Electmmc dab ham cnnsllltzl durm; me mlzrruuuul much (nanw ofdata hue uI:1.. Whfll pucucnl. Ina-ch ml-In: mug)
`
`Ilelevam no alum ND.
`
`C. DDCUIAE}-IT'S C.‘ONSlDB.I..ED TO BE ILELEVANT
`
`Cihlun of dwlmlfllh Irllh lndluimn. Illa’: apprupruu. at Lhc Itlcvmt pawuu
`hI0,A,95 10144 (TELIA AB ;ENGSTROEM EU
`(SE); LARSSON ROGER (55)) 13 Apr'1'T 1995
`see the who1e document
`
`US,A,5 295 138 (GREENBERG A FREDERICK ET
`AL) 15 March 1994
`see claims
`
`US,A.5 400 322 (HUNT RONALD R
`March 1995
`
`ET AL) 21
`
`see co'|uIrn 1. Tina 31 -
`
`::u‘Iurnn 3.
`
`line 63
`
`EP.A.@ 537 181 (SIEMENS AG) 1 February
`1995
`see the whu'|e document
`
`-/--
`
`'
`.
`
`Further document: are lutcd u-: Ihe curumunnon ofboz C.
`al
`I
`:
`5”“ °"''°"'5 " “"1 °°'°"""'"‘
`,
`.
`A
`;‘:':.':|“:“ ‘R WM“. " a“
`'E' earlxu dcnunailbut puhlnslnd an or afler lhe lntunnuond
`film; due
`'L' document which any Lhmw dunk: an pnnrity dun-(1) or
`“""" " “*3 “‘ "“"“""' "" P“°"‘“°“ "“‘ °‘ ‘“°“""
`"“"n‘m “rum” ‘Fad "'3'" ('5 'Fm'r"d’
`'0' document referring In an oral dudosure, nu. :Id'u'mu'om or
`oh: man:
`‘r-' dnzurnu-II guhlunhzd prirw m an II-Ila-n:|:n'|J|] film; mm hm
`laur than lhc pnu-uy date clurnad
`DIM M U.“ [$5] Cdlflflltllnll Of "16 I.fll'.€!‘|'|lUDI.I1 flllfli
`
`22 October 1995
`Nun: Ind rnallnz Iddrua uflhn ISA
`Bnnpan P.1un!Dffiee. P.I!. SH I Pllmflatn 2
`EL . 2231: HV :u,;~.,x
`.
`.
`s
`.
`;:'(:’;1?,':_:,=,*.?,3';¢.‘:" 3' ° “"°“'
`Full FCTJSAJIII (Iemml nhull Uulv um
`
`Pm:-.t funily member: 1:: Listed in muck.
`-1- am: uumnmn puliishzd afltr the mlcrnannnnl «inn; an
`wrpimnty dam mu not In nflmt wlm lhl appllulnun ‘am
`1ll\&1lCfJ
`med Io undzrxlind ma pmnpl: or theory underlying Ihc
`-X- mcwmntm Famcuu. “Nun”. mt dime‘ mvamcm
`‘
`carmd. b: culndcnenl ncnrd or cannot be curndend to
`anvnlue an nnunhw sup whln Ih: dacumnu :2 uknn alone
`‘Y nocumznx. of namcmu relevance: the damned znvenuon
`unnd. be ammdgred In mvulvn an mvenlxve sup whzn the
`docunur-.1 n oombnmd wuh am or nan ouun xuch douu.
`rncm: such com"-manna hung ohvmut lo a patriot: iailcd
`"1 ‘M 1-‘L
`‘a.’ d.ocum¢ruma'nba' of lb! um: potent family
`DUI Of rnuhngof 1'18 1.1’!-£fl11|l¢X|lJ MIND N31‘
`
`11- 95
`1 3.
`Auhanlud olfitu
`
`Janyszek, J-M
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 525
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 525
`
`
`
`(-4-4 )
`
`?§§E*F 1 1 -5 0 8 4 1 7
`
`INTERNATIONAL smncu REPORT
`
`l.I:I:-n- Wmllhmllfll-lllll No
`
`PCIISE 95/99314
`
`T E
`
`1-7,
`14-18,20
`
`LECTRONICS LETTERS. 27 OCT. 1994. UK,
`V01. 30. no. 22,
`ISSN G013-5194.
`pages 1831-1832, XP00049G811
`CHAN C -|( ET AL:
`‘Efficient frequency
`assignment schema for intermodu1ation
`distortion reduction in fibre-optic
`micrnce1Iular systems"
`see the whole document
`
`EP,A.0 498 539 (NORTHERN TELECOM LTD) 17
`June 1992
`see the whole document
`
`Fun PC'l‘il5A41I||l_mlvIAIIIIun|I 51 -um mm; um um]
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 526
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 526
`
`
`
`(-4 5 )
`
`?§§E%‘1 1 -5 0 8-4 1 7
`
`INTERNA'I'IO:AL :1-iancn um-on-r
`'” ""'”'“'
`
`hm,“ Aflmm
`pm, 5: 95/913314
`
`cimd in search report.
`
`din
`
`member(s)
`SE-C-
`EP-A—
`
`503548
`0721705
`9363213
`
`in:
`Bl-07-96
`17-67-96
`
`4325190
`943525
`
`2632325
`5239676
`
`B2-B2-95
`28-B1-95
`
`15-06-92
`24—B8—93
`
`Fun PCRJISAJJIHVII-at lnniv luau) may 1.!!!)
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 527
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 527
`
`
`
`'F=§E¥'11—'508-41
`
`7mybN—Vm%%
`
`3P(AT,B3,CH,DE,
`aufififl
`DK,3S,FI,F%,GB,GR,IE.IT,4
`U.MC,NL,PT,SE),OA(RF,RJ,C?
`,CG,CI,CM,GA,GN,DL,MR,NE,
`sN,Tu,TGLzu%Ku,Ls,Mw.sD,s
`Z,UGLLMHAM,AZ.BY,KG,KZ,MD
`,%U,TJ,TWD,AL,AM,AT,AU,AZ
`,BB,BG,BR,BY,CA,CH,CN,CZ
`D3.DK.EE,ES.FI.GB.GE.HU,I
`L,rs,JP,KR,KG,KP,KR,Kz,LK
`,LH,Ls,LT,LU,Lv,MD,Mc,MK,
`MN,MW,MX,NO,NZ,PL,PT,RO,R
`U,SD,SE,SG,SI.SK,TJ,TM,TH
`.TT,UA,UG,UZ,VN
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 528
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 528
`
`
`
`International Bureau
`WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION
`
`INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
`
`(51) Imernflfional Patent C135-$59350“ 7 3
`H04M 3/00
`
`(11) International Publication Number:
`_
`_
`,
`(43) International Publication Date:
`
`WO 00/64130
`
`26 October 2000 (26.I0.00)
`
`(21) International Application Number:
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`(22) International Filing Date:
`
`17 April 2000 (17.04.00)
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`09/294,563
`
`20 April 1999 (20.04.99)
`
`US
`
`(71) Applicant: TERADYNE, INC. [US/US]; 321 Harrison Avenue,
`Boston, MA 02118 (US).
`
`(72) Inventors: RUDINSKI, Ilia, L.; 1717 W. Crystal Lane, Mount
`Prospect, IL 60056 (US). SCHMIDT, Kurt, E.; 6444 W.
`Brever Road, Burlington, WI 53105 (US).
`
`(74) Agent: WALSH, Edmund, J.; Teradyne, Inc., 321 Harrison
`Avenue, Boston, MA 02118 (US).
`
`(81) Designated States: AE. AG, AL. AM. AT, AU. AZ, BA. BB.
`BG, BR, BY, CA, CH, CN, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM,
`DZ, EE, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, HR, HU, ID, IL,
`IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KP, KR, KZ, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU,
`LV, MA, MD, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, NO, NZ, PL, PT,
`RO, RU, SD, SE, SG, SI, SK, SL, TJ, TM, TR, TI‘, TZ,
`UA, UG, UZ, VN, YU, ZA, ZW, ARIPO patent (GH, GM,
`KE, LS, MW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZW), Eurasian patent
`(AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), European patent
`(AT, BE, CH, CY, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, IE, IT,
`LU, MC, NL, PT, SE), OAPI patent (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI,
`CM, GA, GN, GW, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`
`Published
`Without international search report and to be republished
`upon receipt of that report.
`
`(54) Title: DETERMINING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF SUBSCRIBER LINES
`
`H)
`
`(57) Abstract
`
`A method determines a structure of a subscriber line. The method includes searching a reference set for a match between the
`subscriber line and a model line of the reference set and identifying that the subscriber line has a specific physical structure. The match is
`based on electrical properties of the lines. The act of identifying is responsive to finding a match with one of the model lines that has the
`specific physical structure.
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 529
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 529
`
`
`
`FOR THE PURPOSES OF INFORMATION ONLY
`
`Codes used to identify States party to the PCT on the front pages of pamphlets publishing international applications under the PCT.
`LS
`Lesotho
`Albania
`SI
`Slovenia
`ES
`LT
`SK
`Lithuania
`Slovakia
`Armenia
`FI
`SN
`Austria
`FR
`LU
`Senegal
`Luxembourg
`Australia
`LV
`SZ
`GA
`Latvia
`Swaziland
`TD
`MC
`Monaco
`Chad
`GB
`Azerbaijan
`MD
`TG
`GE
`Togo
`Republic of Moldova
`Bosnia and Herzegovina
`Barbados
`GH
`MG
`TJ
`Tajikistan
`Madagascar
`MK
`TM
`GN
`Turkmenistan
`The fonner Yugoslav
`Belgium
`TR
`Burkina Faso
`GR
`Turkey
`Republic of Macedonia
`HU
`TT
`Mali
`Trinidad and Tobago
`Bulgaria
`Ukraine
`IE
`UA
`Benin
`Mongolia
`Mauritania
`UG
`Brrzil
`IL
`Uganda
`US
`United States of America
`Malawi
`Belarus
`IS
`Uzbekistan
`Canada
`IT
`Mexico
`UZ
`VN
`Viet Nam
`JP
`Niger
`Central African Republic
`Netherlands
`YU
`KE
`Yugoslavia
`Congo
`Zimbabwe
`ZW
`Switzerland
`KG
`Norway
`KP
`New Zealand
`Cote d’Ivoire
`Poland
`Cameroon
`China
`Portugal
`Cuba
`Romania
`Russian Federation
`Czech Republic
`Sudan
`Gennany
`Denmark
`Sweden
`Estonia
`Singapore
`
`Spain
`Finland
`France
`Gabon
`United Kingdom
`Georgia
`Ghana
`Guinea
`Greece
`Hungary
`Ireland
`Israel
`loeland
`Italy
`Japan
`Kenya
`Kyrgyzstan
`Democratic People's
`Republic of Korea
`Republic of Korea
`Kazakstan
`Saint Lucia
`Liechtenstein
`Sri Lanka
`Liberia
`
`ML
`MN
`MR
`MW
`MX
`NE
`NL
`NO
`NZ
`PL
`Pl‘
`RO
`RU
`SD
`SE
`SG
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 530
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 530
`
`
`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`DETERMINING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF SUBSCRIBER LINES
`
`This is a continuation—in—part of Application No.
`
`U.S. Application No. 09/294,563, filed April 20, 1999.
`
`
`
`This application relates generally to communications
`
`networks, and more particularly,
`
`to determining electrical
`
`properties of multi—wire communication lines.
`
`Recently,
`
`there has been an increased demand for the
`
`subscriber lines of plain old telephone services
`
`(POTS's)
`
`to carry high—speed digital signals.
`
`The demand has been
`
`stimulated by home access to both the Internet and distant
`
`office computers. Both types of access typically employ a
`
`POTS
`
`line as part of
`
`the path for
`
`carrying digital
`
`signals.
`POTS's
`
`lines were built
`
`to carry voice signals at
`
`audible frequencies and can also carry digital signals as
`
`tone signals in the near audible frequency range. Modern
`
`digital services such as
`
`ISDN and ADSL transmit data at
`
`frequencies well above the audible range. At these higher
`
`frequencies, POTS‘s lines that transmit voice signals well
`
`may transmit digital signals poorly. Nevertheless, many
`
`to
`like
`(TELCO‘s) would
`telephone operating companies
`offer ISDN and/or ADSL data services to their subscribers.
`
`Telephone
`
`lines
`
`between
`
`a
`
`TELCO
`
`switch
`
`and
`
`subscribers‘
`
`premises
`
`are
`
`frequent
`
`sources
`
`of
`
`poor
`
`performance at the high frequencies characteristic of ISDN
`and ADSL transmissions. Nevertheless, high cost has made
`
`an
`lines
`subscriber
`these
`of
`replacement
`widespread
`undesirable solution for providing subscribers with lines
`
`capable of supporting ISDN and. ADSL.
`
`A.
`
`less expensive
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 531
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 531
`
`
`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`alternative would
`
`be
`
`to repair
`
`or
`
`remove
`
`only those
`
`subscriber
`
`lines
`
`that
`
`are
`
`inadequate
`
`for
`
`transmitting
`
`high—speed digital data.
`
`To limit
`
`replacement or repair to inadequate lines,
`
`TELCO‘s have placed some emphasis on developing methods
`
`for predicting which subscriber
`
`lines will
`
`support data
`
`services,
`
`such as ISDN and ADSL.
`
`Some emphasis has been
`
`also placed on predicting frequency ranges at which such
`data services will be supported.
`Some methods have also
`
`been developed for
`
`finding faults
`
`in subscriber
`
`lines
`
`already supporting data services so that
`
`such faults can
`
`be repaired.
`Current methods
`
`for
`
`predicting
`
`the
`
`ability of
`
`subscriber
`
`lines
`
`to
`
`support
`
`high—speed
`
`digital
`
`transmissions
`
`are
`
`typically
`
`not
`
`automated,
`
`labor
`
`intensive,
`
`and entail
`
`test access at multiple points.
`
`Often,
`
`these methods entail using skilled interpretations
`
`of
`
`high
`
`frequency measurements
`
`of
`
`line parameters
`
`to
`
`determine data
`
`transmission abilities.
`
`At
`
`a
`
`network
`
`scale, such tests are very expensive to implement.
`
`The present
`
`invention is directed to overcoming or,
`
`at
`
`least,
`
`reducing the affects of one or more of
`
`the
`
`problems set forth above.
`
`Summary of the Invention
`
`In a first aspect,
`
`the invention provides a method of
`
`line.
`a subscriber
`determining a physical structure of
`The method includes searching a reference set for a match
`
`between the
`
`subscriber
`
`line and a model
`
`line of
`
`the
`
`reference set and identifying that the subscriber line has
`
`a specific physical structure.
`
`The match is based on
`
`electrical
`
`properties
`
`of
`
`the
`
`lines.
`
`The
`
`act
`
`of
`
`identifying is responsive to finding a match with one of
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 532
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 532
`
`
`
`W0 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`the model lines that has the specific physical structure.
`
`In a second aspect,
`
`the invention provides a method
`
`The
`of qualifying a subscriber line for a data service.
`method includes searching a reference set of model lines
`
`for a best match to a subscriber line by comparing sets
`
`of electrical properties and determining that the
`
`subscriber line has a specific physical structure.
`
`The
`
`act of determining is responsive to the best matching
`
`model line having the specific physical structure.
`
`The
`
`method also includes disqualifying the subscriber line
`
`for the data service,
`
`in part,
`
`in response to determining
`
`that the specific physical structure corresponds to a
`
`disqualified line.
`
`In a third aspect,
`
`the invention provides a method
`
`of providing a data service.
`
`The method includes
`
`searching for a match between electrical properties of a
`subscriber line and a model line of a reference set and
`
`determining whether the subscriber's line is qualified
`for the data service.
`The act of determining is based in
`
`part on whether the best matching model line has one of a
`The method also
`
`bridged tap and a mixture of gauges.
`
`includes performing a business action in response to
`
`determining that the subscriber's line is qualified.
`invention provides
`a data
`In a
`fourth aspect,
`the
`that
`
`an
`
`executable
`
`program of
`
`storage
`
`device
`
`stores
`
`instructions for causing a computer to perform one or more
`of the above—described methods.
`
`Various embodiments use test accesses, which provide
`
`data on low frequency electrical properties of subscriber
`
`lines,
`
`to
`
`make
`
`predictions
`
`about
`
`high
`
`frequency
`
`performance.
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 533
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 533
`
`
`
`W0 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`Brief Description of the Drawings
`
`Other
`
`features and advantages of
`
`the invention will
`
`be apparent
`
`from the following description taken together
`
`with the drawings in which:
`
`FIG.
`
`I
`
`shows
`
`a portion of
`
`a
`
`POTS network having a
`
`system for detecting faults in subscriber telephone lines;
`
`FIG.
`
`2A shows a first measuring setup for making one-
`
`ended electrical measurements on a
`line;
`
`subscriber
`
`telephone
`
`FIG.
`
`2B is an equivalent circuit
`
`for_ the Ineasuring
`
`setup of FIG. 2A;
`
`FIG.
`one—ended
`
`second measuring setup. for making
`a
`2C shows
`electrical measurements
`on
`a
`subscriber
`
`telephone line;
`
`3 illustrates signal distortions produced by the
`FIG.
`test bus and standard voice test access;
`
`FIG.
`
`FIG.
`
`4
`
`5
`
`pair fault;
`
`shows a split pair fault in a subscriber line;
`
`shows how a splice error can produce a split
`
`a phase measurement
`6A shows
`FIG.
`resistive imbalance on a subscriber line;
`
`signature of
`
`a
`
`FIG.
`
`6B shows
`
`a phase measurement
`
`signature of
`
`a
`
`split pair fault on a subscriber line;
`
`FIG.
`
`7
`
`is
`
`a
`
`flow chart
`
`illustrating a method of
`
`detecting faults on subscriber
`
`lines with the system of
`
`FIGS. 1, 4, and 5;
`
`FIG.
`
`8
`
`is
`
`a
`
`flow chart
`
`illustrating a method of
`
`qualifying subscriber lines with the method of FIG. 7;
`
`FIG.
`
`9
`
`shows
`
`a method of providing high speed data
`
`services using the methods of FIGs.
`
`7 and 8;
`
`FIG.
`
`1OA—l0E show exemplary subscriber
`
`lines having
`
`different gauge mixes;
`
`FIG.
`
`11 shows a subscriber line with a bridged tap;
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 534
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 534
`
`
`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`FIG.
`
`l2A—12E shows exemplary structures of subscriber
`
`lines having one bridged tap;
`FIG.
`13 is a flow chart for a method of determining
`
`the specific physical structure of a subscriber line from
`a reference set;
`
`FIG.
`
`14
`
`is a
`
`flow chart
`
`for
`
`a method of
`
`finding a
`
`best match between a subscriber and model lines;
`
`FIG.
`
`15 is a
`
`flow chart
`
`for
`
`a method of qualifying
`
`subscriber lines; and
`
`FIG.
`
`16
`
`is a
`
`flow chart
`
`for
`
`a business method. of
`
`providing high—speed data services to subscribers.
`FIG.
`17
`is a
`flow chart
`for
`a
`stacked method of
`
`detecting bridged taps using auxiliary variables;
`
`FIG.
`
`18A
`
`shows
`
`predicted
`
`and
`
`actual
`
`signal
`
`attenuations of nominal subscriber lines;
`actual
`FIG.
`18B
`shows
`predicted
`and
`attenuations of non—nominal subscriber lines;
`
`signal
`
`FIG.
`
`18C
`
`shows predicted,
`
`shifted predicted,
`
`and
`
`signal
`actual
`subscriber line;
`
`attenuations
`
`for
`
`an
`
`exemplary
`
`nominal
`
`FIG. 19 shows an exemplary decision tree;
`
`FIG.
`
`20 illustrates the action of
`
`the rules of
`
`the
`
`decision tree of FIG. 19 on a set of subscriber lines;
`
`FIG.
`
`21
`
`is a
`
`flow chart
`
`illustrating a method of
`
`creating the decision trees with machine learning methods;
`and
`
`FIG.
`
`22 is a
`
`flow chart for a method of determining
`
`the branching rules of
`FIGS. 19-20.
`
`the decision tree illustrated in
`
`Description of the Preferred Embodiments
`MEASUREMENT AND TEST APPARATUS
`
`FIG.
`
`I shows a portion of a POTS network 10 that has
`
`a system 11 for detecting faults in subscriber lines 12-
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 535
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 535
`
`
`
`wo 00/64130
`
`PCTfUS00/10301
`
`14.
`
`The subscriber
`
`lines 12-14 connect subscriber units
`
`telephony
`to a
`telephones,
`and/or
`i.e., modems
`16-18,
`switch 15.
`The switch 15 connects the subscriber
`lines
`
`12-14 to the remainder of the telephone network 10.
`
`The
`
`switch 15 may be a POTS switch or another device, e.g.,
`
`a
`
`digital subscriber loop access multiplexer (DSLAM).
`Each subscriber
`line 12-14 consists of
`a
`
`standard
`
`twisted
`
`two—wire
`
`telephone
`
`line
`
`adapted
`
`to
`
`voice
`
`transmissions.
`
`The two wires are generally referred to as
`
`the ring AR@ and tip AT@ wires.
`
`line 12-14
`each subscriber
`A large portion of
`is
`housed in one or more standard telephone cables 22.
`The,
`cable 22 carries many subscriber lines 12-14, e.g., more
`than a dozen,
`in a closely packed configuration.
`The
`
`close
`
`packing
`
`creates
`
`an electrical
`
`environment
`
`that
`
`transmission
`changes
`subscriber lines 12-14.
`
`properties
`
`of
`
`the
`
`individual
`
`Electrical measurements for detecting line faults are
`
`various
`In
`,
`40.
`unit
`a measurement
`by
`performed
`embodiments,
`the measurement unit 40 includes one or both
`devices 41 and 43.
`Each device 41,
`43 performs one—ended
`
`electrical measurements
`
`on
`
`selected lines
`
`12-14.
`
`In
`
`are
`the electrical measurements
`preferred embodiments,
`one—ended.
`The device 41 performs measurements on tip and
`
`ring wires of a selected subscriber line 12-14 in a common
`mode
`configuration
`and
`produces
`results
`useful
`for
`
`detecting split pairs.
`
`The
`
`device
`
`43
`
`can measure.
`
`admittances of the tip and ring wires of a selected line
`
`12-14 either
`
`separately or
`
`together
`
`and produces data
`
`useful
`
`for
`
`determining
`
`the
`
`specific
`
`physical
`
`line
`
`structure.
`
`The measurement unit 40 may also house other
`
`devices
`
`(not
`
`shown)
`
`for
`
`performing
`
`other
`
`types
`
`of
`
`electrical measurements,
`
`i.e.,
`
`one-ended
`
`or
`
`two-ended
`
`measurements.
`
`The measurement unit
`
`40
`
`couples
`
`to the
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 536
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 536
`
`
`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`switch 15 via a test bus 42.
`
`The devices 41,
`
`43 connect
`
`to the switch 15 through
`
`the test bus 42 and a standard voice test access 44.
`
`voice test
`
`access
`
`44 electrically connects either
`
`The
`
`the
`
`device
`
`41 or device
`
`43
`
`to the subscriber
`
`lines
`
`12-14
`
`selected for testing.
`
`The voice test access 44 generally
`
`transmits electrical signals with low frequencies between
`
`(KHZ).
`and 20 kilo Hz
`about 100 Hertz (Hz)
`access
`44 may
`transmit
`signals at higher
`
`the test
`But,
`frequencies,
`
`in some switches 15.
`e.g., up to 100 to 300 KHZ,
`The measurement unit 40 is controlled by computer 46,
`
`the
`which selects the types of measurements performed,
`device 41,
`43 used,
`and the subscriber
`lines
`12-14 to
`test.
`The
`computer
`46
`sends
`control
`signals
`to the
`
`measurement unit
`
`40 via a connection 48, e.g.,
`
`a
`
`line,
`
`network,
`
`or dedicated wire,
`
`and
`
`receives measurement
`
`results
`
`from the measurement
`
`unit
`
`40
`
`via
`
`the
`
`same
`
`connection 48.
`
`The
`
`computer
`
`46
`
`contains
`
`a
`
`software program for
`
`controlling line testing by the measurement unit
`
`40 and
`
`for detecting line conditions or faults with results from
`the measurement unit 40.
`The software program is stored,
`
`a
`in a data storage device 49, e.g.,
`in executable form,
`hard drive or random access memory (RAM).
`The program may
`also be encoded on a readable storage medium 50,
`such as
`
`an optical or magnetic disk,
`executed.
`
`from which the program can be
`
`40 signals
`the neasurement unit
`test,
`To perfonn a
`the voice test access 44 to connect
`the line 12-14 to be
`
`tested to wires of
`
`the bus 42
`
`for connecting to internal
`
`devices 41, 43.
`
`Then, one or both of the internal devices
`
`43 performs electrical measurements on the selected
`41,
`line 12-14. After
`the measurements are completed,
`the
`
`measurement unit
`
`40 signals the switch 15 to disconnect
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 537
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 537
`
`
`
`W0 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/1030]
`
`the line 12-14 from the wires of the bus 42.
`
`The
`
`computer
`
`46
`
`can classify selected subscriber
`
`lines 12-14 prior to fully connecting the lines 12-14 for
`
`data services.
`
`The range of possible classes to which a
`
`line 12-14 can be assigned will depend on the business
`
`needs of
`
`a TELCO.
`
`A simple, but very useful
`
`set of
`
`classes is "qualified" and "disqualified" to provide data
`
`services.
`
`Qualification is based on ‘determining, with
`
`high certainty,
`
`that a selected line 12-14 will support a
`
`specified data
`
`service.
`
`Disqualification is based on
`
`determining, with high certainty,
`
`that
`
`the selected line
`
`12-14 will not support the specified data service.
`FIG.
`2A shows
`a first
`setup 52
`for -performing one
`
`type of one-ended electrical measurements with the device
`41.
`The measurements are used to detect faults such as
`
`split pairs in the subscriber lines 12-14 of FIG. 1.
`The device 41 has a variable frequency voltage source
`
`54
`
`for driving the
`
`tip and
`
`ring wires T,
`
`R of
`
`the
`
`subscriber
`
`line 12-14 under
`
`test.
`
`The voltage source
`
`drives both wires
`
`together,
`
`i.e.,
`
`in a
`
`common mode
`
`configuration,
`
`at
`
`a
`
`frequency
`
`controlled
`
`by
`
`the
`
`measurement unit 40.
`
`The tip and ring wires T,
`
`R of the
`
`line 12-14 under test are connected to the device 41 via
`
`the voice test access 44.
`
`The
`
`voltage
`
`source
`
`54
`
`connects
`
`to one
`
`side
`
`of
`
`resistors Ri and R2.
`
`The second side of resistors R1 and R2
`
`connect
`to the respective tip and ring wires T, R of
`the
`subscriber
`line 12-14 under
`test.
`Thus,
`the voltage
`source 54 drives the tip and ring wires T,
`R in common
`
`mode through the corresponding resistors R1 and Rp
`
`The resistors R1 and R2 have equal resistances so that
`
`the voltage source 54 induces equal voltages V1, V2 between
`each resistor R1,
`R2
`and ground if the currents
`IT,
`IR
`
`therein
`
`are
`
`also equal.
`
`Differences
`
`in
`
`the
`
`input
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 538
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 538
`
`
`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`impedances Zr,
`
`ZR of the tip and ring wires T,
`
`R make the
`
`voltages Vb
`
`V2 differ
`
`in amplitude and/or phase.
`
`For
`
`example, mutual
`
`inductance effects produced by a split
`
`ZR unequal.
`impedances ZT,
`pair can make the input
`Voltmeters VM; and VM2 measure amplitudes and phases
`
`From measurements of
`respectively.
`of voltages V1 and V2,
`the voltmeters VM1 and VM2,
`the computer 46 can obtain the
`
`phase difference between V1 and V2
`
`FIG.
`
`2B
`
`shows
`
`an
`
`equivalent circuit
`
`55
`
`for
`
`the
`
`measurement
`
`setup 52 of
`
`FIG.
`
`4.
`
`In the common mode
`
`configuration,
`
`the :ip and ring wires T, R act as elements
`
`the voltage
`that connect
`57
`independent circuits 56,
`of
`source 54
`to a
`common ground 58.
`The
`tip wire T
`is
`
`equivalent
`
`to an impedance ZT
`
`in the circuit 56,
`
`and the
`
`ring wire R is equivalent to an impedance ZR in the circuit
`57.
`
`The
`
`input
`
`impedances
`
`ZT
`
`and ZR may ‘have different
`
`amplitudes and/or phases due to the presence of a fault on
`
`either the tip or ring wires T, R. Different values for ZT
`
`and Zn produce different currents IT and IR in the circuits
`56 and 57 and different measured voltages V; and V2.
`The
`
`phase of the voltage difference V1 — V2
`
`is proportional
`
`to
`
`the phase difference between the input
`
`impedances of
`
`the
`
`In the phase of the difference V1
`tip and ring wires T, R.
`— V2,
`termination effects associated with the attached.
`subscriber unit 16 can largely be ignored.
`
`FIG.
`
`2C shows
`
`a
`
`Ineasuring setup 60
`
`for performing
`
`one—ended electrical measurements on a selected subscriber
`
`line 12-14 with the device 43 shown in FIG 1.
`
`The device
`
`43 measures electrical properties, which can be used to
`
`determine the specific physical structure of the lines 12-
`14
`and to determine line conditions
`and‘ faults
`as
`is
`described below.
`Some methods
`for detecting line faults
`
`and conditions with the device 43 have been described in
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 539
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 539
`
`
`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`U.S. Application No. 09/294,563
`
`(‘563),
`
`filed April 20,
`
`1999.
`
`The
`
`‘563 application is
`
`incorporated. herein,
`
`by
`
`reference,
`
`in its entirety.
`
`The device
`
`43
`
`is
`
`adapted to measure
`
`admittances
`
`between the tip wire T,
`
`ring wire R,
`
`and ground G for a
`
`subscriber
`
`line 12-14 being tested.
`
`The‘
`
`tip and ring
`
`wires T,
`
`R of
`
`the
`
`line 12-14 being tested couple
`
`to
`
`driving voltages V1’ and V2’
`
`through known conductances Gt
`
`and Gr.
`
`The
`
`tip and ring wires T,
`
`R also connect
`
`to
`
`voltmeters V;
`
`and VI. The Vt and V, voltmeters
`
`read the
`
`voltage between the tip wire T and ground G and between
`
`The readings
`respectively.
`the ring wire R and ground G,
`from the voltmeters Vt and V, enable the computer
`46 to
`
`determine three admittances Ytm Ya,
`
`and Yng between the
`
`respectively.
`tip—ring, and ring—ground,
`pairs tip—ground,
`The device 43 can measure the admittances at preselected
`
`frequencies
`
`in the range
`
`supported by
`
`the voice
`
`test
`
`access 44.
`
`The ‘563 application has described methods for
`
`performing such measurements.
`
`Referring to FIG. 3,
`
`the computer 46 may compensate
`
`42
`test bus
`the
`introduced by
`signal distortions
`for
`and/or the voice test access 44.
`To perform compensation,
`
`the combined bus
`the computer 46 treats the two lines of
`42 and test access 44 as a linear two port systems.
`Then,
`
`the currents
`
`and voltages
`
`IT‘,
`
`VT’
`
`and IR‘, VR'
`
`at
`
`the
`
`terminals of the measurement device 40 are related
`output
`to the currents and voltages IT, V5 and IR, VR on the output
`
`terminals of the tip and ring wires T, R by the following
`
`2x2 matrix equations:
`
`[IT, VT] = A(f)
`
`[IT', VT']t and [IT, Vi] = A'(f)
`
`[IR', Va']t-
`
`The
`
`frequency dependent matrices A(f)
`
`and A'(f)
`
`are
`
`determined experimentally for each bus 42 and voice test
`access
`44.
`Then,
`the
`computer
`46
`calculates
`the
`
`impedances or admittances of the tip and ring wires T,
`
`R
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 540
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 540
`
`
`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/1030]
`
`with the currents and voltages IT,
`
`VT and IR, Va obtained
`
`from the above equations.
`
`The measurement unit
`
`40
`
`and computer 46 can detect
`
`faults such as split pairs, resistive imbalances, metallic
`
`faults,
`
`load coils, bridged taps, gauge mixtures, and high
`
`signal attenuations.
`
`Co—pending U.S. Patent Application
`
`O9/285,954
`
`('954),
`
`filed April
`
`2,
`
`1999, describes
`
`the
`
`detection of
`
`some of
`
`these faults
`
`and is incorporated
`
`herein by reference in its entirety.
`
`SPLIT PAIRS
`
`Referring again
`
`to
`
`FIG.
`
`1,
`
`close
`
`proximity can
`
`inductively produce
`
`cross
`
`talk between
`
`the
`
`subscriber
`
`lines 12-14.
`
`Cross
`
`talk is frequently caused by large
`
`noise or ringing signals on one of
`
`the lines 12-14.
`
`The
`
`large signal
`
`inductively produces signals on nearby lines
`
`12~14.
`
`To reduce cross talk,
`
`the tip and ring wires T, R
`
`of each subscriber line 12-14 are either tightly twisted
`
`together or kept
`
`in close proximity in the cable 22.
`
`this way,
`
`stray signals affect both wires of
`
`a pair
`
`In
`
`so
`
`that
`
`induced signals do not
`
`impact
`
`the difference signal
`
`between the tip and ring wires.
`
`Referring to FIG. 4,
`
`the tip and ring wires T‘, R‘ of
`
`a subscriber line 24 are separated spatially in a portion
`
`the subscriber
`The portion of
`of cable 26.
`which
`the
`tip and
`ring wires T’,
`R‘
`are
`
`in
`line 24
`spatially
`
`separated is referred to as
`
`a split pair.
`
`A split pair
`
`talk other
`a high risk of picking up cross
`T’, R‘ has
`lines 28-29 in the same cable 26 or external noise sources
`
`such as power lines (not shown).
`
`Split pairs also introduce impedance discontinuities
`
`into subscriber
`
`lines, because the split pair creates a
`
`localized and
`
`abrupt
`
`impedance variation.
`
`Impedance
`
`discontinuities
`
`can
`
`cause
`
`signal
`
`reflections
`
`and high
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 541
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 541
`
`
`
`W0 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`signal attenuations for high—speed digital transmissions.
`FIG.
`5
`illustrates one type of split pair,
`i.e.,
`
`a
`
`The splice error
`split pair caused by a splice error.
`occurred when two portions of a subscriber line 32, which
`
`are located in two different cables 33, 34, were joined.
`
`The splice 35 has joined tip and ring wires T1, R2
`
`from two
`
`different twisted pair lines 36,
`
`37 in the cable 33 to tip-
`
`and ring wires T3,
`
`R3 of a single twisted pair 38 in the
`
`adjacent cable 34.
`
`The tip and ring wires T1,
`
`R2 of
`
`the
`
`portion of the subscriber line 32 are widely separated in
`
`a substantial portion of the cable 33.
`
`Thus,
`
`the tip and
`
`ring wires T1, R2 form a split pair.
`
`Detection of
`
`split pair
`
`faults
`
`is difficult
`
`for
`
`several reasons. First, split pairs do not produce easily
`
`detected effects
`
`such as metallic faults,
`
`i.e.,
`
`broken
`
`wires or shorted wires, or impedance imbalances.
`
`Second,
`
`split pairs produce cross talk that produce intermittent
`
`faults depending on the signals
`
`on nearby lines, e.g.,
`
`intermittent
`
`ringing signals.
`
`The
`
`intermittency makes
`
`such faults difficult to recognize.
`
`Conventional
`
`tests have not been very successful
`
`in
`
`detecting split pairs.
`
`Nevertheless,
`
`split pairs
`
`can«
`
`degrade the quality of a subscriber
`data services.
`
`line for high—speed
`
`FIG.
`
`6A and 6B provide graphs 68,
`
`69 of the phase of
`
`the voltage difference V1
`
`— V2 between resistors R1 and R2
`
`while testing two exemplary subscriber
`
`lines 12-14 with
`
`the measurement
`
`setup 52 of FIG. 4.
`
`The graphs 68,
`
`69
`
`provide frequency sweeps of
`
`the phase difference, which
`
`show signatures of faults that can interfere with high—
`
`speed data services, e.g.,
`
`ISDN or ADSL.
`
`the graph 68 shows a signature
`6A,
`Referring to FIG.
`for a resistive imbalance fault on the tested subscriber
`
`line 12-14.
`
`The signature for a resistive imbalance is a
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 542
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 542
`
`
`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`pronounced peak in the phase of the voltage difference V1 -
`
`V2.
`
`The peak appears
`
`in the phase difference between
`
`a
`The peak has
`the tip and ring wires.
`impedances of
`narrow width that is typically not more than a few hundred
`
`to about
`
`2 KHZ.
`
`Typically,
`
`the phase has
`
`a height of
`
`greater than about 53
`Referring to FIG.
`
`6B,
`
`the graph 69 shows a signature
`
`for a split pair fault on the tested subscriber line l2-
`
`14. The
`
`signature is a
`
`flat
`
`and substantially constant
`
`phase for V1
`
`— V2,
`
`i.e.,
`
`a substantially constant non—zero
`
`phase difference between the input
`impedances ZT,
`ZR of the
`wires T, R.
`Typically,
`the phase has a value of between
`about
`.5° and l.5°.
`The nonzero and flat phase extends
`
`over a
`
`region of
`
`frequencies having a width of at
`
`least
`
`5,000 kilo Hz.
`
`The phase of
`
`ZT and ZR may remain flat,
`
`lOO Hz to about 20,000 Hz
`nonzero, and peakless from about
`if a split pair is present, i.e., over the frequency range
`measurable through the voice test access 44,
`shown in FIG.
`
`1.
`
`A nonzero and substantially frequency independent
`
`phase difference between the input
`
`impedances ZT,
`
`ZR of the
`
`tip and ring wires is a signature for a split pair on the
`subscriber line 12-14 being tested.
`
`FIG.
`
`7
`
`is a flow chart
`
`illustrating a method 70 of
`
`detecting a fault
`
`in the subscriber lines 12-14 with the
`
`selects
`46
`computer
`The
`1.
`FIG.
`system 11 .of
`subscriber line 12-14 to test for faults (step 72).
`
`the
`The