throbber
(38)
`
`5F¥‘r».3E3Z11—5O8417
`
`{4}
`
`FIG. 4B
`
`4aCD1 ? ~y 7"42B7b‘ 5
`
`fifiEfi%#
`
`
`
`Cfl 35i'(.}‘I‘}E|Jf1E’&
`‘D137-1.»./\i5§%>
`
`
`
`
`
` HaT‘fliEC/I Y§§UE1E:&U
`
`
`
`fifi I Ziflllfi-2”‘fI'§ ‘E
`‘L’ X 5‘ A /\ ii 7;;
`
`4aCD
`X '7' ‘y 7414’\
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 520
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 520
`
`

`
`~‘F|Jfi§EIfiE>Zs:
`NE|l1fi:‘3EiEU)
`HEfi%E%E?§
`
`%fl»“F‘.7$5E1§E"Ffi
`Méfliflfiiiifi E
`53U"1='_'T 5
`
`&7tab%%T&
`U>7§%%«fi5
`
`‘J lz '7 '§1§1§fJ‘ '5
`7‘E|Ji$1:’§$"é"‘s'i"I§‘d'<5
`B L» < ld:flH‘§T’&
`§Z‘1’.%‘T %»
`
`514
`
`§zTE;C/|’5:7E?'5
`
`'F=i%¥'1 1-508-117
`
`FIG. 5
`
`3F:3$0D
`:1? 7:6 L \$f§fi§
`E|J1fl’2‘33£‘$EEfl‘?
`
`a'%’J»‘3F$iE5lEfEfifi
`EUMESE ’&
`5&0/lEIJfll§5i$J‘£
`9: SEQ T 5
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 521
`
`DBH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 521
`
`

`
`'F=i%¥'1 1-508-117
`
`WK? #3 L < Ii
`ifillfi
`§4?fivt—§
`€"?.‘T§?5
`
`fifwiflfifiififl)
`I’E:7fl|JE L» T
`5Fi’5J*f|.'.‘6'§
`
`Mamamm
`‘*}‘7t",' #03
`mmwiur
`
`m%@
`1 F “J 7632/\
`
`_
`.
`V1T*?5
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 522
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 522
`
`

`
`'»?%"fi%¥1 1-508-117
`
`saw} 77‘ '7 763041‘)
`
`Bad)
`x -7* -2 7622’\
`
`fifiéntflmmflm
`¥%m¢m
`Efltflfiiiifi EEO £7‘ 6
`
`C/I
`lat b 3 l.“IE
`ivfifimfl
`?
`
`Ellflifiififii
`E ‘:21 27- lax
`iEf§T€>
`
`fl6a®
`1 :7‘ -y 7622r\
`
`Emit:
`fifiéflftah‘
`'?
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 523
`
`DBH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 523
`
`

`
`'F=i%¥'1 1-508-117
`
`FIG. 7
`
`E'Hfl'i3.3$7'E£?E$E
`)‘ '7 ‘[2 — ‘7/“
`>E'i£f§TI<'>
`
`33}? L T:
`E|J#Hi£:3E E €121’
`flmfifiv
`?
`
`‘U’ 7-1:’ :1 F
`$2 L < I;
`E'J1fii£5E'§‘v’.'%
`)4 -y 11- ‘)7
`’&i3E1§'§‘§>
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 524
`
`DBH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 524
`
`

`
`'F=§E¥'11—'508-41
`
`INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT
`
`A. CJASSI FIGKTIGN
`IFC 5
`H040 ,'?55""E'“Th'é‘3fl§'."/05
`
`Acmrdirq La lnmrnlumal Falznl Gamficxhm (IPC) or us: both nuuonal clasnficunou Ind [PC
`B, FIELDS SEARCHED
`Mnumum aoeummunm xcu-chtd. (clunifinnon system ft-llnuvzd by dasslhclllon ayrnbvla)
`IPC 6
`H340
`H0-EL
`
`Imam-'
`
`‘El Amllclicn N0
`
`PC1,.~;E 95/99314
`
`Duumcnlalwll Ilrthell III‘-‘Ir Ihan lmnlmun documcnuuar. to the exam ma! Iltll cbchmenls an Induce :11 U1: fmlus scardnen
`
`Electmmc dab ham cnnsllltzl durm; me mlzrruuuul much (nanw ofdata hue uI:1.. Whfll pucucnl. Ina-ch ml-In: mug)
`
`Ilelevam no alum ND.
`
`C. DDCUIAE}-IT'S C.‘ONSlDB.I..ED TO BE ILELEVANT
`
`Cihlun of dwlmlfllh Irllh lndluimn. Illa’: apprupruu. at Lhc Itlcvmt pawuu
`hI0,A,95 10144 (TELIA AB ;ENGSTROEM EU
`(SE); LARSSON ROGER (55)) 13 Apr'1'T 1995
`see the who1e document
`
`US,A,5 295 138 (GREENBERG A FREDERICK ET
`AL) 15 March 1994
`see claims
`
`US,A.5 400 322 (HUNT RONALD R
`March 1995
`
`ET AL) 21
`
`see co'|uIrn 1. Tina 31 -
`
`::u‘Iurnn 3.
`
`line 63
`
`EP.A.@ 537 181 (SIEMENS AG) 1 February
`1995
`see the whu'|e document
`
`-/--
`
`'
`.
`
`Further document: are lutcd u-: Ihe curumunnon ofboz C.
`al
`I
`:
`5”“ °"''°"'5 " “"1 °°'°"""'"‘
`,
`.
`A
`;‘:':.':|“:“ ‘R WM“. " a“
`'E' earlxu dcnunailbut puhlnslnd an or afler lhe lntunnuond
`film; due
`'L' document which any Lhmw dunk: an pnnrity dun-(1) or
`“""" " “*3 “‘ "“"“""' "" P“°"‘“°“ "“‘ °‘ ‘“°“""
`"“"n‘m “rum” ‘Fad "'3'" ('5 'Fm'r"d’
`'0' document referring In an oral dudosure, nu. :Id'u'mu'om or
`oh: man:
`‘r-' dnzurnu-II guhlunhzd prirw m an II-Ila-n:|:n'|J|] film; mm hm
`laur than lhc pnu-uy date clurnad
`DIM M U.“ [$5] Cdlflflltllnll Of "16 I.fll'.€!‘|'|lUDI.I1 flllfli
`
`22 October 1995
`Nun: Ind rnallnz Iddrua uflhn ISA
`Bnnpan P.1un!Dffiee. P.I!. SH I Pllmflatn 2
`EL . 2231: HV :u,;~.,x
`.
`.
`s
`.
`;:'(:’;1?,':_:,=,*.?,3';¢.‘:" 3' ° “"°“'
`Full FCTJSAJIII (Iemml nhull Uulv um
`
`Pm:-.t funily member: 1:: Listed in muck.
`-1- am: uumnmn puliishzd afltr the mlcrnannnnl «inn; an
`wrpimnty dam mu not In nflmt wlm lhl appllulnun ‘am
`1ll\&1lCfJ
`med Io undzrxlind ma pmnpl: or theory underlying Ihc
`-X- mcwmntm Famcuu. “Nun”. mt dime‘ mvamcm
`‘
`carmd. b: culndcnenl ncnrd or cannot be curndend to
`anvnlue an nnunhw sup whln Ih: dacumnu :2 uknn alone
`‘Y nocumznx. of namcmu relevance: the damned znvenuon
`unnd. be ammdgred In mvulvn an mvenlxve sup whzn the
`docunur-.1 n oombnmd wuh am or nan ouun xuch douu.
`rncm: such com"-manna hung ohvmut lo a patriot: iailcd
`"1 ‘M 1-‘L
`‘a.’ d.ocum¢ruma'nba' of lb! um: potent family
`DUI Of rnuhngof 1'18 1.1’!-£fl11|l¢X|lJ MIND N31‘
`
`11- 95
`1 3.
`Auhanlud olfitu
`
`Janyszek, J-M
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 525
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 525
`
`

`
`(-4-4 )
`
`?§§E*F 1 1 -5 0 8 4 1 7
`
`INTERNATIONAL smncu REPORT
`
`l.I:I:-n- Wmllhmllfll-lllll No
`
`PCIISE 95/99314
`
`T E
`
`1-7,
`14-18,20
`
`LECTRONICS LETTERS. 27 OCT. 1994. UK,
`V01. 30. no. 22,
`ISSN G013-5194.
`pages 1831-1832, XP00049G811
`CHAN C -|( ET AL:
`‘Efficient frequency
`assignment schema for intermodu1ation
`distortion reduction in fibre-optic
`micrnce1Iular systems"
`see the whole document
`
`EP,A.0 498 539 (NORTHERN TELECOM LTD) 17
`June 1992
`see the whole document
`
`Fun PC'l‘il5A41I||l_mlvIAIIIIun|I 51 -um mm; um um]
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 526
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 526
`
`

`
`(-4 5 )
`
`?§§E%‘1 1 -5 0 8-4 1 7
`
`INTERNA'I'IO:AL :1-iancn um-on-r
`'” ""'”'“'
`
`hm,“ Aflmm
`pm, 5: 95/913314
`
`cimd in search report.
`
`din
`
`member(s)
`SE-C-
`EP-A—
`
`503548
`0721705
`9363213
`
`in:
`Bl-07-96
`17-67-96
`
`4325190
`943525
`
`2632325
`5239676
`
`B2-B2-95
`28-B1-95
`
`15-06-92
`24—B8—93
`
`Fun PCRJISAJJIHVII-at lnniv luau) may 1.!!!)
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 527
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 527
`
`

`
`'F=§E¥'11—'508-41
`
`7mybN—Vm%%
`
`3P(AT,B3,CH,DE,
`aufififl
`DK,3S,FI,F%,GB,GR,IE.IT,4
`U.MC,NL,PT,SE),OA(RF,RJ,C?
`,CG,CI,CM,GA,GN,DL,MR,NE,
`sN,Tu,TGLzu%Ku,Ls,Mw.sD,s
`Z,UGLLMHAM,AZ.BY,KG,KZ,MD
`,%U,TJ,TWD,AL,AM,AT,AU,AZ
`,BB,BG,BR,BY,CA,CH,CN,CZ
`D3.DK.EE,ES.FI.GB.GE.HU,I
`L,rs,JP,KR,KG,KP,KR,Kz,LK
`,LH,Ls,LT,LU,Lv,MD,Mc,MK,
`MN,MW,MX,NO,NZ,PL,PT,RO,R
`U,SD,SE,SG,SI.SK,TJ,TM,TH
`.TT,UA,UG,UZ,VN
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 528
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 528
`
`

`
`International Bureau
`WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION
`
`INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
`
`(51) Imernflfional Patent C135-$59350“ 7 3
`H04M 3/00
`
`(11) International Publication Number:
`_
`_
`,
`(43) International Publication Date:
`
`WO 00/64130
`
`26 October 2000 (26.I0.00)
`
`(21) International Application Number:
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`(22) International Filing Date:
`
`17 April 2000 (17.04.00)
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`09/294,563
`
`20 April 1999 (20.04.99)
`
`US
`
`(71) Applicant: TERADYNE, INC. [US/US]; 321 Harrison Avenue,
`Boston, MA 02118 (US).
`
`(72) Inventors: RUDINSKI, Ilia, L.; 1717 W. Crystal Lane, Mount
`Prospect, IL 60056 (US). SCHMIDT, Kurt, E.; 6444 W.
`Brever Road, Burlington, WI 53105 (US).
`
`(74) Agent: WALSH, Edmund, J.; Teradyne, Inc., 321 Harrison
`Avenue, Boston, MA 02118 (US).
`
`(81) Designated States: AE. AG, AL. AM. AT, AU. AZ, BA. BB.
`BG, BR, BY, CA, CH, CN, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM,
`DZ, EE, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, HR, HU, ID, IL,
`IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KP, KR, KZ, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU,
`LV, MA, MD, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, NO, NZ, PL, PT,
`RO, RU, SD, SE, SG, SI, SK, SL, TJ, TM, TR, TI‘, TZ,
`UA, UG, UZ, VN, YU, ZA, ZW, ARIPO patent (GH, GM,
`KE, LS, MW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZW), Eurasian patent
`(AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), European patent
`(AT, BE, CH, CY, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, IE, IT,
`LU, MC, NL, PT, SE), OAPI patent (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI,
`CM, GA, GN, GW, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`
`Published
`Without international search report and to be republished
`upon receipt of that report.
`
`(54) Title: DETERMINING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF SUBSCRIBER LINES
`
`H)
`
`(57) Abstract
`
`A method determines a structure of a subscriber line. The method includes searching a reference set for a match between the
`subscriber line and a model line of the reference set and identifying that the subscriber line has a specific physical structure. The match is
`based on electrical properties of the lines. The act of identifying is responsive to finding a match with one of the model lines that has the
`specific physical structure.
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 529
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 529
`
`

`
`FOR THE PURPOSES OF INFORMATION ONLY
`
`Codes used to identify States party to the PCT on the front pages of pamphlets publishing international applications under the PCT.
`LS
`Lesotho
`Albania
`SI
`Slovenia
`ES
`LT
`SK
`Lithuania
`Slovakia
`Armenia
`FI
`SN
`Austria
`FR
`LU
`Senegal
`Luxembourg
`Australia
`LV
`SZ
`GA
`Latvia
`Swaziland
`TD
`MC
`Monaco
`Chad
`GB
`Azerbaijan
`MD
`TG
`GE
`Togo
`Republic of Moldova
`Bosnia and Herzegovina
`Barbados
`GH
`MG
`TJ
`Tajikistan
`Madagascar
`MK
`TM
`GN
`Turkmenistan
`The fonner Yugoslav
`Belgium
`TR
`Burkina Faso
`GR
`Turkey
`Republic of Macedonia
`HU
`TT
`Mali
`Trinidad and Tobago
`Bulgaria
`Ukraine
`IE
`UA
`Benin
`Mongolia
`Mauritania
`UG
`Brrzil
`IL
`Uganda
`US
`United States of America
`Malawi
`Belarus
`IS
`Uzbekistan
`Canada
`IT
`Mexico
`UZ
`VN
`Viet Nam
`JP
`Niger
`Central African Republic
`Netherlands
`YU
`KE
`Yugoslavia
`Congo
`Zimbabwe
`ZW
`Switzerland
`KG
`Norway
`KP
`New Zealand
`Cote d’Ivoire
`Poland
`Cameroon
`China
`Portugal
`Cuba
`Romania
`Russian Federation
`Czech Republic
`Sudan
`Gennany
`Denmark
`Sweden
`Estonia
`Singapore
`
`Spain
`Finland
`France
`Gabon
`United Kingdom
`Georgia
`Ghana
`Guinea
`Greece
`Hungary
`Ireland
`Israel
`loeland
`Italy
`Japan
`Kenya
`Kyrgyzstan
`Democratic People's
`Republic of Korea
`Republic of Korea
`Kazakstan
`Saint Lucia
`Liechtenstein
`Sri Lanka
`Liberia
`
`ML
`MN
`MR
`MW
`MX
`NE
`NL
`NO
`NZ
`PL
`Pl‘
`RO
`RU
`SD
`SE
`SG
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 530
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 530
`
`

`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`DETERMINING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF SUBSCRIBER LINES
`
`This is a continuation—in—part of Application No.
`
`U.S. Application No. 09/294,563, filed April 20, 1999.
`
`
`
`This application relates generally to communications
`
`networks, and more particularly,
`
`to determining electrical
`
`properties of multi—wire communication lines.
`
`Recently,
`
`there has been an increased demand for the
`
`subscriber lines of plain old telephone services
`
`(POTS's)
`
`to carry high—speed digital signals.
`
`The demand has been
`
`stimulated by home access to both the Internet and distant
`
`office computers. Both types of access typically employ a
`
`POTS
`
`line as part of
`
`the path for
`
`carrying digital
`
`signals.
`POTS's
`
`lines were built
`
`to carry voice signals at
`
`audible frequencies and can also carry digital signals as
`
`tone signals in the near audible frequency range. Modern
`
`digital services such as
`
`ISDN and ADSL transmit data at
`
`frequencies well above the audible range. At these higher
`
`frequencies, POTS‘s lines that transmit voice signals well
`
`may transmit digital signals poorly. Nevertheless, many
`
`to
`like
`(TELCO‘s) would
`telephone operating companies
`offer ISDN and/or ADSL data services to their subscribers.
`
`Telephone
`
`lines
`
`between
`
`a
`
`TELCO
`
`switch
`
`and
`
`subscribers‘
`
`premises
`
`are
`
`frequent
`
`sources
`
`of
`
`poor
`
`performance at the high frequencies characteristic of ISDN
`and ADSL transmissions. Nevertheless, high cost has made
`
`an
`lines
`subscriber
`these
`of
`replacement
`widespread
`undesirable solution for providing subscribers with lines
`
`capable of supporting ISDN and. ADSL.
`
`A.
`
`less expensive
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 531
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 531
`
`

`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`alternative would
`
`be
`
`to repair
`
`or
`
`remove
`
`only those
`
`subscriber
`
`lines
`
`that
`
`are
`
`inadequate
`
`for
`
`transmitting
`
`high—speed digital data.
`
`To limit
`
`replacement or repair to inadequate lines,
`
`TELCO‘s have placed some emphasis on developing methods
`
`for predicting which subscriber
`
`lines will
`
`support data
`
`services,
`
`such as ISDN and ADSL.
`
`Some emphasis has been
`
`also placed on predicting frequency ranges at which such
`data services will be supported.
`Some methods have also
`
`been developed for
`
`finding faults
`
`in subscriber
`
`lines
`
`already supporting data services so that
`
`such faults can
`
`be repaired.
`Current methods
`
`for
`
`predicting
`
`the
`
`ability of
`
`subscriber
`
`lines
`
`to
`
`support
`
`high—speed
`
`digital
`
`transmissions
`
`are
`
`typically
`
`not
`
`automated,
`
`labor
`
`intensive,
`
`and entail
`
`test access at multiple points.
`
`Often,
`
`these methods entail using skilled interpretations
`
`of
`
`high
`
`frequency measurements
`
`of
`
`line parameters
`
`to
`
`determine data
`
`transmission abilities.
`
`At
`
`a
`
`network
`
`scale, such tests are very expensive to implement.
`
`The present
`
`invention is directed to overcoming or,
`
`at
`
`least,
`
`reducing the affects of one or more of
`
`the
`
`problems set forth above.
`
`Summary of the Invention
`
`In a first aspect,
`
`the invention provides a method of
`
`line.
`a subscriber
`determining a physical structure of
`The method includes searching a reference set for a match
`
`between the
`
`subscriber
`
`line and a model
`
`line of
`
`the
`
`reference set and identifying that the subscriber line has
`
`a specific physical structure.
`
`The match is based on
`
`electrical
`
`properties
`
`of
`
`the
`
`lines.
`
`The
`
`act
`
`of
`
`identifying is responsive to finding a match with one of
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 532
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 532
`
`

`
`W0 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`the model lines that has the specific physical structure.
`
`In a second aspect,
`
`the invention provides a method
`
`The
`of qualifying a subscriber line for a data service.
`method includes searching a reference set of model lines
`
`for a best match to a subscriber line by comparing sets
`
`of electrical properties and determining that the
`
`subscriber line has a specific physical structure.
`
`The
`
`act of determining is responsive to the best matching
`
`model line having the specific physical structure.
`
`The
`
`method also includes disqualifying the subscriber line
`
`for the data service,
`
`in part,
`
`in response to determining
`
`that the specific physical structure corresponds to a
`
`disqualified line.
`
`In a third aspect,
`
`the invention provides a method
`
`of providing a data service.
`
`The method includes
`
`searching for a match between electrical properties of a
`subscriber line and a model line of a reference set and
`
`determining whether the subscriber's line is qualified
`for the data service.
`The act of determining is based in
`
`part on whether the best matching model line has one of a
`The method also
`
`bridged tap and a mixture of gauges.
`
`includes performing a business action in response to
`
`determining that the subscriber's line is qualified.
`invention provides
`a data
`In a
`fourth aspect,
`the
`that
`
`an
`
`executable
`
`program of
`
`storage
`
`device
`
`stores
`
`instructions for causing a computer to perform one or more
`of the above—described methods.
`
`Various embodiments use test accesses, which provide
`
`data on low frequency electrical properties of subscriber
`
`lines,
`
`to
`
`make
`
`predictions
`
`about
`
`high
`
`frequency
`
`performance.
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 533
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 533
`
`

`
`W0 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`Brief Description of the Drawings
`
`Other
`
`features and advantages of
`
`the invention will
`
`be apparent
`
`from the following description taken together
`
`with the drawings in which:
`
`FIG.
`
`I
`
`shows
`
`a portion of
`
`a
`
`POTS network having a
`
`system for detecting faults in subscriber telephone lines;
`
`FIG.
`
`2A shows a first measuring setup for making one-
`
`ended electrical measurements on a
`line;
`
`subscriber
`
`telephone
`
`FIG.
`
`2B is an equivalent circuit
`
`for_ the Ineasuring
`
`setup of FIG. 2A;
`
`FIG.
`one—ended
`
`second measuring setup. for making
`a
`2C shows
`electrical measurements
`on
`a
`subscriber
`
`telephone line;
`
`3 illustrates signal distortions produced by the
`FIG.
`test bus and standard voice test access;
`
`FIG.
`
`FIG.
`
`4
`
`5
`
`pair fault;
`
`shows a split pair fault in a subscriber line;
`
`shows how a splice error can produce a split
`
`a phase measurement
`6A shows
`FIG.
`resistive imbalance on a subscriber line;
`
`signature of
`
`a
`
`FIG.
`
`6B shows
`
`a phase measurement
`
`signature of
`
`a
`
`split pair fault on a subscriber line;
`
`FIG.
`
`7
`
`is
`
`a
`
`flow chart
`
`illustrating a method of
`
`detecting faults on subscriber
`
`lines with the system of
`
`FIGS. 1, 4, and 5;
`
`FIG.
`
`8
`
`is
`
`a
`
`flow chart
`
`illustrating a method of
`
`qualifying subscriber lines with the method of FIG. 7;
`
`FIG.
`
`9
`
`shows
`
`a method of providing high speed data
`
`services using the methods of FIGs.
`
`7 and 8;
`
`FIG.
`
`1OA—l0E show exemplary subscriber
`
`lines having
`
`different gauge mixes;
`
`FIG.
`
`11 shows a subscriber line with a bridged tap;
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 534
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 534
`
`

`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`FIG.
`
`l2A—12E shows exemplary structures of subscriber
`
`lines having one bridged tap;
`FIG.
`13 is a flow chart for a method of determining
`
`the specific physical structure of a subscriber line from
`a reference set;
`
`FIG.
`
`14
`
`is a
`
`flow chart
`
`for
`
`a method of
`
`finding a
`
`best match between a subscriber and model lines;
`
`FIG.
`
`15 is a
`
`flow chart
`
`for
`
`a method of qualifying
`
`subscriber lines; and
`
`FIG.
`
`16
`
`is a
`
`flow chart
`
`for
`
`a business method. of
`
`providing high—speed data services to subscribers.
`FIG.
`17
`is a
`flow chart
`for
`a
`stacked method of
`
`detecting bridged taps using auxiliary variables;
`
`FIG.
`
`18A
`
`shows
`
`predicted
`
`and
`
`actual
`
`signal
`
`attenuations of nominal subscriber lines;
`actual
`FIG.
`18B
`shows
`predicted
`and
`attenuations of non—nominal subscriber lines;
`
`signal
`
`FIG.
`
`18C
`
`shows predicted,
`
`shifted predicted,
`
`and
`
`signal
`actual
`subscriber line;
`
`attenuations
`
`for
`
`an
`
`exemplary
`
`nominal
`
`FIG. 19 shows an exemplary decision tree;
`
`FIG.
`
`20 illustrates the action of
`
`the rules of
`
`the
`
`decision tree of FIG. 19 on a set of subscriber lines;
`
`FIG.
`
`21
`
`is a
`
`flow chart
`
`illustrating a method of
`
`creating the decision trees with machine learning methods;
`and
`
`FIG.
`
`22 is a
`
`flow chart for a method of determining
`
`the branching rules of
`FIGS. 19-20.
`
`the decision tree illustrated in
`
`Description of the Preferred Embodiments
`MEASUREMENT AND TEST APPARATUS
`
`FIG.
`
`I shows a portion of a POTS network 10 that has
`
`a system 11 for detecting faults in subscriber lines 12-
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 535
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 535
`
`

`
`wo 00/64130
`
`PCTfUS00/10301
`
`14.
`
`The subscriber
`
`lines 12-14 connect subscriber units
`
`telephony
`to a
`telephones,
`and/or
`i.e., modems
`16-18,
`switch 15.
`The switch 15 connects the subscriber
`lines
`
`12-14 to the remainder of the telephone network 10.
`
`The
`
`switch 15 may be a POTS switch or another device, e.g.,
`
`a
`
`digital subscriber loop access multiplexer (DSLAM).
`Each subscriber
`line 12-14 consists of
`a
`
`standard
`
`twisted
`
`two—wire
`
`telephone
`
`line
`
`adapted
`
`to
`
`voice
`
`transmissions.
`
`The two wires are generally referred to as
`
`the ring AR@ and tip AT@ wires.
`
`line 12-14
`each subscriber
`A large portion of
`is
`housed in one or more standard telephone cables 22.
`The,
`cable 22 carries many subscriber lines 12-14, e.g., more
`than a dozen,
`in a closely packed configuration.
`The
`
`close
`
`packing
`
`creates
`
`an electrical
`
`environment
`
`that
`
`transmission
`changes
`subscriber lines 12-14.
`
`properties
`
`of
`
`the
`
`individual
`
`Electrical measurements for detecting line faults are
`
`various
`In
`,
`40.
`unit
`a measurement
`by
`performed
`embodiments,
`the measurement unit 40 includes one or both
`devices 41 and 43.
`Each device 41,
`43 performs one—ended
`
`electrical measurements
`
`on
`
`selected lines
`
`12-14.
`
`In
`
`are
`the electrical measurements
`preferred embodiments,
`one—ended.
`The device 41 performs measurements on tip and
`
`ring wires of a selected subscriber line 12-14 in a common
`mode
`configuration
`and
`produces
`results
`useful
`for
`
`detecting split pairs.
`
`The
`
`device
`
`43
`
`can measure.
`
`admittances of the tip and ring wires of a selected line
`
`12-14 either
`
`separately or
`
`together
`
`and produces data
`
`useful
`
`for
`
`determining
`
`the
`
`specific
`
`physical
`
`line
`
`structure.
`
`The measurement unit 40 may also house other
`
`devices
`
`(not
`
`shown)
`
`for
`
`performing
`
`other
`
`types
`
`of
`
`electrical measurements,
`
`i.e.,
`
`one-ended
`
`or
`
`two-ended
`
`measurements.
`
`The measurement unit
`
`40
`
`couples
`
`to the
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 536
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 536
`
`

`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`switch 15 via a test bus 42.
`
`The devices 41,
`
`43 connect
`
`to the switch 15 through
`
`the test bus 42 and a standard voice test access 44.
`
`voice test
`
`access
`
`44 electrically connects either
`
`The
`
`the
`
`device
`
`41 or device
`
`43
`
`to the subscriber
`
`lines
`
`12-14
`
`selected for testing.
`
`The voice test access 44 generally
`
`transmits electrical signals with low frequencies between
`
`(KHZ).
`and 20 kilo Hz
`about 100 Hertz (Hz)
`access
`44 may
`transmit
`signals at higher
`
`the test
`But,
`frequencies,
`
`in some switches 15.
`e.g., up to 100 to 300 KHZ,
`The measurement unit 40 is controlled by computer 46,
`
`the
`which selects the types of measurements performed,
`device 41,
`43 used,
`and the subscriber
`lines
`12-14 to
`test.
`The
`computer
`46
`sends
`control
`signals
`to the
`
`measurement unit
`
`40 via a connection 48, e.g.,
`
`a
`
`line,
`
`network,
`
`or dedicated wire,
`
`and
`
`receives measurement
`
`results
`
`from the measurement
`
`unit
`
`40
`
`via
`
`the
`
`same
`
`connection 48.
`
`The
`
`computer
`
`46
`
`contains
`
`a
`
`software program for
`
`controlling line testing by the measurement unit
`
`40 and
`
`for detecting line conditions or faults with results from
`the measurement unit 40.
`The software program is stored,
`
`a
`in a data storage device 49, e.g.,
`in executable form,
`hard drive or random access memory (RAM).
`The program may
`also be encoded on a readable storage medium 50,
`such as
`
`an optical or magnetic disk,
`executed.
`
`from which the program can be
`
`40 signals
`the neasurement unit
`test,
`To perfonn a
`the voice test access 44 to connect
`the line 12-14 to be
`
`tested to wires of
`
`the bus 42
`
`for connecting to internal
`
`devices 41, 43.
`
`Then, one or both of the internal devices
`
`43 performs electrical measurements on the selected
`41,
`line 12-14. After
`the measurements are completed,
`the
`
`measurement unit
`
`40 signals the switch 15 to disconnect
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 537
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 537
`
`

`
`W0 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/1030]
`
`the line 12-14 from the wires of the bus 42.
`
`The
`
`computer
`
`46
`
`can classify selected subscriber
`
`lines 12-14 prior to fully connecting the lines 12-14 for
`
`data services.
`
`The range of possible classes to which a
`
`line 12-14 can be assigned will depend on the business
`
`needs of
`
`a TELCO.
`
`A simple, but very useful
`
`set of
`
`classes is "qualified" and "disqualified" to provide data
`
`services.
`
`Qualification is based on ‘determining, with
`
`high certainty,
`
`that a selected line 12-14 will support a
`
`specified data
`
`service.
`
`Disqualification is based on
`
`determining, with high certainty,
`
`that
`
`the selected line
`
`12-14 will not support the specified data service.
`FIG.
`2A shows
`a first
`setup 52
`for -performing one
`
`type of one-ended electrical measurements with the device
`41.
`The measurements are used to detect faults such as
`
`split pairs in the subscriber lines 12-14 of FIG. 1.
`The device 41 has a variable frequency voltage source
`
`54
`
`for driving the
`
`tip and
`
`ring wires T,
`
`R of
`
`the
`
`subscriber
`
`line 12-14 under
`
`test.
`
`The voltage source
`
`drives both wires
`
`together,
`
`i.e.,
`
`in a
`
`common mode
`
`configuration,
`
`at
`
`a
`
`frequency
`
`controlled
`
`by
`
`the
`
`measurement unit 40.
`
`The tip and ring wires T,
`
`R of the
`
`line 12-14 under test are connected to the device 41 via
`
`the voice test access 44.
`
`The
`
`voltage
`
`source
`
`54
`
`connects
`
`to one
`
`side
`
`of
`
`resistors Ri and R2.
`
`The second side of resistors R1 and R2
`
`connect
`to the respective tip and ring wires T, R of
`the
`subscriber
`line 12-14 under
`test.
`Thus,
`the voltage
`source 54 drives the tip and ring wires T,
`R in common
`
`mode through the corresponding resistors R1 and Rp
`
`The resistors R1 and R2 have equal resistances so that
`
`the voltage source 54 induces equal voltages V1, V2 between
`each resistor R1,
`R2
`and ground if the currents
`IT,
`IR
`
`therein
`
`are
`
`also equal.
`
`Differences
`
`in
`
`the
`
`input
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 538
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 538
`
`

`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`impedances Zr,
`
`ZR of the tip and ring wires T,
`
`R make the
`
`voltages Vb
`
`V2 differ
`
`in amplitude and/or phase.
`
`For
`
`example, mutual
`
`inductance effects produced by a split
`
`ZR unequal.
`impedances ZT,
`pair can make the input
`Voltmeters VM; and VM2 measure amplitudes and phases
`
`From measurements of
`respectively.
`of voltages V1 and V2,
`the voltmeters VM1 and VM2,
`the computer 46 can obtain the
`
`phase difference between V1 and V2
`
`FIG.
`
`2B
`
`shows
`
`an
`
`equivalent circuit
`
`55
`
`for
`
`the
`
`measurement
`
`setup 52 of
`
`FIG.
`
`4.
`
`In the common mode
`
`configuration,
`
`the :ip and ring wires T, R act as elements
`
`the voltage
`that connect
`57
`independent circuits 56,
`of
`source 54
`to a
`common ground 58.
`The
`tip wire T
`is
`
`equivalent
`
`to an impedance ZT
`
`in the circuit 56,
`
`and the
`
`ring wire R is equivalent to an impedance ZR in the circuit
`57.
`
`The
`
`input
`
`impedances
`
`ZT
`
`and ZR may ‘have different
`
`amplitudes and/or phases due to the presence of a fault on
`
`either the tip or ring wires T, R. Different values for ZT
`
`and Zn produce different currents IT and IR in the circuits
`56 and 57 and different measured voltages V; and V2.
`The
`
`phase of the voltage difference V1 — V2
`
`is proportional
`
`to
`
`the phase difference between the input
`
`impedances of
`
`the
`
`In the phase of the difference V1
`tip and ring wires T, R.
`— V2,
`termination effects associated with the attached.
`subscriber unit 16 can largely be ignored.
`
`FIG.
`
`2C shows
`
`a
`
`Ineasuring setup 60
`
`for performing
`
`one—ended electrical measurements on a selected subscriber
`
`line 12-14 with the device 43 shown in FIG 1.
`
`The device
`
`43 measures electrical properties, which can be used to
`
`determine the specific physical structure of the lines 12-
`14
`and to determine line conditions
`and‘ faults
`as
`is
`described below.
`Some methods
`for detecting line faults
`
`and conditions with the device 43 have been described in
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 539
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 539
`
`

`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`U.S. Application No. 09/294,563
`
`(‘563),
`
`filed April 20,
`
`1999.
`
`The
`
`‘563 application is
`
`incorporated. herein,
`
`by
`
`reference,
`
`in its entirety.
`
`The device
`
`43
`
`is
`
`adapted to measure
`
`admittances
`
`between the tip wire T,
`
`ring wire R,
`
`and ground G for a
`
`subscriber
`
`line 12-14 being tested.
`
`The‘
`
`tip and ring
`
`wires T,
`
`R of
`
`the
`
`line 12-14 being tested couple
`
`to
`
`driving voltages V1’ and V2’
`
`through known conductances Gt
`
`and Gr.
`
`The
`
`tip and ring wires T,
`
`R also connect
`
`to
`
`voltmeters V;
`
`and VI. The Vt and V, voltmeters
`
`read the
`
`voltage between the tip wire T and ground G and between
`
`The readings
`respectively.
`the ring wire R and ground G,
`from the voltmeters Vt and V, enable the computer
`46 to
`
`determine three admittances Ytm Ya,
`
`and Yng between the
`
`respectively.
`tip—ring, and ring—ground,
`pairs tip—ground,
`The device 43 can measure the admittances at preselected
`
`frequencies
`
`in the range
`
`supported by
`
`the voice
`
`test
`
`access 44.
`
`The ‘563 application has described methods for
`
`performing such measurements.
`
`Referring to FIG. 3,
`
`the computer 46 may compensate
`
`42
`test bus
`the
`introduced by
`signal distortions
`for
`and/or the voice test access 44.
`To perform compensation,
`
`the combined bus
`the computer 46 treats the two lines of
`42 and test access 44 as a linear two port systems.
`Then,
`
`the currents
`
`and voltages
`
`IT‘,
`
`VT’
`
`and IR‘, VR'
`
`at
`
`the
`
`terminals of the measurement device 40 are related
`output
`to the currents and voltages IT, V5 and IR, VR on the output
`
`terminals of the tip and ring wires T, R by the following
`
`2x2 matrix equations:
`
`[IT, VT] = A(f)
`
`[IT', VT']t and [IT, Vi] = A'(f)
`
`[IR', Va']t-
`
`The
`
`frequency dependent matrices A(f)
`
`and A'(f)
`
`are
`
`determined experimentally for each bus 42 and voice test
`access
`44.
`Then,
`the
`computer
`46
`calculates
`the
`
`impedances or admittances of the tip and ring wires T,
`
`R
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 540
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 540
`
`

`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/1030]
`
`with the currents and voltages IT,
`
`VT and IR, Va obtained
`
`from the above equations.
`
`The measurement unit
`
`40
`
`and computer 46 can detect
`
`faults such as split pairs, resistive imbalances, metallic
`
`faults,
`
`load coils, bridged taps, gauge mixtures, and high
`
`signal attenuations.
`
`Co—pending U.S. Patent Application
`
`O9/285,954
`
`('954),
`
`filed April
`
`2,
`
`1999, describes
`
`the
`
`detection of
`
`some of
`
`these faults
`
`and is incorporated
`
`herein by reference in its entirety.
`
`SPLIT PAIRS
`
`Referring again
`
`to
`
`FIG.
`
`1,
`
`close
`
`proximity can
`
`inductively produce
`
`cross
`
`talk between
`
`the
`
`subscriber
`
`lines 12-14.
`
`Cross
`
`talk is frequently caused by large
`
`noise or ringing signals on one of
`
`the lines 12-14.
`
`The
`
`large signal
`
`inductively produces signals on nearby lines
`
`12~14.
`
`To reduce cross talk,
`
`the tip and ring wires T, R
`
`of each subscriber line 12-14 are either tightly twisted
`
`together or kept
`
`in close proximity in the cable 22.
`
`this way,
`
`stray signals affect both wires of
`
`a pair
`
`In
`
`so
`
`that
`
`induced signals do not
`
`impact
`
`the difference signal
`
`between the tip and ring wires.
`
`Referring to FIG. 4,
`
`the tip and ring wires T‘, R‘ of
`
`a subscriber line 24 are separated spatially in a portion
`
`the subscriber
`The portion of
`of cable 26.
`which
`the
`tip and
`ring wires T’,
`R‘
`are
`
`in
`line 24
`spatially
`
`separated is referred to as
`
`a split pair.
`
`A split pair
`
`talk other
`a high risk of picking up cross
`T’, R‘ has
`lines 28-29 in the same cable 26 or external noise sources
`
`such as power lines (not shown).
`
`Split pairs also introduce impedance discontinuities
`
`into subscriber
`
`lines, because the split pair creates a
`
`localized and
`
`abrupt
`
`impedance variation.
`
`Impedance
`
`discontinuities
`
`can
`
`cause
`
`signal
`
`reflections
`
`and high
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 541
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 541
`
`

`
`W0 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`signal attenuations for high—speed digital transmissions.
`FIG.
`5
`illustrates one type of split pair,
`i.e.,
`
`a
`
`The splice error
`split pair caused by a splice error.
`occurred when two portions of a subscriber line 32, which
`
`are located in two different cables 33, 34, were joined.
`
`The splice 35 has joined tip and ring wires T1, R2
`
`from two
`
`different twisted pair lines 36,
`
`37 in the cable 33 to tip-
`
`and ring wires T3,
`
`R3 of a single twisted pair 38 in the
`
`adjacent cable 34.
`
`The tip and ring wires T1,
`
`R2 of
`
`the
`
`portion of the subscriber line 32 are widely separated in
`
`a substantial portion of the cable 33.
`
`Thus,
`
`the tip and
`
`ring wires T1, R2 form a split pair.
`
`Detection of
`
`split pair
`
`faults
`
`is difficult
`
`for
`
`several reasons. First, split pairs do not produce easily
`
`detected effects
`
`such as metallic faults,
`
`i.e.,
`
`broken
`
`wires or shorted wires, or impedance imbalances.
`
`Second,
`
`split pairs produce cross talk that produce intermittent
`
`faults depending on the signals
`
`on nearby lines, e.g.,
`
`intermittent
`
`ringing signals.
`
`The
`
`intermittency makes
`
`such faults difficult to recognize.
`
`Conventional
`
`tests have not been very successful
`
`in
`
`detecting split pairs.
`
`Nevertheless,
`
`split pairs
`
`can«
`
`degrade the quality of a subscriber
`data services.
`
`line for high—speed
`
`FIG.
`
`6A and 6B provide graphs 68,
`
`69 of the phase of
`
`the voltage difference V1
`
`— V2 between resistors R1 and R2
`
`while testing two exemplary subscriber
`
`lines 12-14 with
`
`the measurement
`
`setup 52 of FIG. 4.
`
`The graphs 68,
`
`69
`
`provide frequency sweeps of
`
`the phase difference, which
`
`show signatures of faults that can interfere with high—
`
`speed data services, e.g.,
`
`ISDN or ADSL.
`
`the graph 68 shows a signature
`6A,
`Referring to FIG.
`for a resistive imbalance fault on the tested subscriber
`
`line 12-14.
`
`The signature for a resistive imbalance is a
`
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 542
`
`DISH
`
`DISH
`Exhibit 1002 Part 2 Page 542
`
`

`
`WO 00/64130
`
`PCT/US00/10301
`
`pronounced peak in the phase of the voltage difference V1 -
`
`V2.
`
`The peak appears
`
`in the phase difference between
`
`a
`The peak has
`the tip and ring wires.
`impedances of
`narrow width that is typically not more than a few hundred
`
`to about
`
`2 KHZ.
`
`Typically,
`
`the phase has
`
`a height of
`
`greater than about 53
`Referring to FIG.
`
`6B,
`
`the graph 69 shows a signature
`
`for a split pair fault on the tested subscriber line l2-
`
`14. The
`
`signature is a
`
`flat
`
`and substantially constant
`
`phase for V1
`
`— V2,
`
`i.e.,
`
`a substantially constant non—zero
`
`phase difference between the input
`impedances ZT,
`ZR of the
`wires T, R.
`Typically,
`the phase has a value of between
`about
`.5° and l.5°.
`The nonzero and flat phase extends
`
`over a
`
`region of
`
`frequencies having a width of at
`
`least
`
`5,000 kilo Hz.
`
`The phase of
`
`ZT and ZR may remain flat,
`
`lOO Hz to about 20,000 Hz
`nonzero, and peakless from about
`if a split pair is present, i.e., over the frequency range
`measurable through the voice test access 44,
`shown in FIG.
`
`1.
`
`A nonzero and substantially frequency independent
`
`phase difference between the input
`
`impedances ZT,
`
`ZR of the
`
`tip and ring wires is a signature for a split pair on the
`subscriber line 12-14 being tested.
`
`FIG.
`
`7
`
`is a flow chart
`
`illustrating a method 70 of
`
`detecting a fault
`
`in the subscriber lines 12-14 with the
`
`selects
`46
`computer
`The
`1.
`FIG.
`system 11 .of
`subscriber line 12-14 to test for faults (step 72).
`
`the
`The

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket