throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00220
`Patent 7,535,890
`
`
`
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 
`I. 
`II.  Requirements under 37 C.F.R. § 42.104 ............................................................ 2 
`A. 
`Identification of challenge and statement of relief requested .................... 2 
`B.  Meaningful distinction between Vuori and Malik ..................................... 3 
`III.  The ’890 Patent .................................................................................................. 4 
`A.  Overview .................................................................................................... 4 
`B.  Claims ......................................................................................................... 5 
`1. 
`Independent Claims ............................................................................ 5 
`2.  Dependent Claims ............................................................................... 8 
`C.  Prosecution History .................................................................................... 8 
`IV.  Claim construction ............................................................................................. 9 
`A.  POSITA ...................................................................................................... 9 
`B.  “External Network” .................................................................................... 9 
`V.  State of the Art ................................................................................................. 12 
`A.  Storing-or-delivering an instant voice message based on recipient
`availability was well-known. .................................................................... 13 
`B.  Different types of networks were well-known. ........................................ 15 
`C.  Distributed server architecture was well-known ...................................... 17 
`D.  Packet-switched networks were well-known ........................................... 19 
`VI.  Ground 1: Vuori and Väänänen Render Obvious Claims 1-3, 5, 14, 15, 17,
`19, 28, 29, 31, 33, 40, 42, 51, 53, 62, and 64. .................................................. 20 
`A.  Overview of Vuori .................................................................................... 20 
`B.  Overview of Väänänen ............................................................................. 22 
`C.  Obviousness of the Vuori-Väänänen Combination .................................. 23 
`D. 
`Independent Claim 1 ................................................................................. 26 
`1. 
`[1.P]: “An instant voice messaging system for delivering instant
`messages over a packet-switched network, the system
`comprising” ....................................................................................... 26 
`[1.1a]: “a client connected to the network” ...................................... 28 
`[1.1b]: “the client selecting one or more recipients” ........................ 29 
`- i -
`
`2. 
`3. 
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`4. 
`5. 
`
`6. 
`7. 
`
`8. 
`
`9. 
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`[1.1c]: “generating an instant voice message therefor” .................... 29 
`[1.1d]: “and transmitting the selected recipients and the instant
`voice message therefor over the network” ....................................... 29 
`[1.2a]: “and a server connected to the network” .............................. 30 
`[1.2b]: “the server receiving the selected recipients and the
`instant voice message therefor,” ....................................................... 30 
`[1.2c]: “and delivering the instant voice message to the selected
`recipients over the network” ............................................................. 31 
`a)  Vuori ......................................................................................... 31 
`b)  Väänänen ................................................................................... 34 
`c)  KSR to modify Vuori ................................................................ 34 
`[1.2d]: “the selected recipients enabled to audibly play the instant
`voice message,” ................................................................................ 35 
`10.  [1.2e]: “the server temporarily storing the instant voice message
`if a selected recipient is unavailable and delivering the stored
`instant voice message to the selected recipient once the selected
`recipient becomes available” ............................................................ 35 
`E.  Dependent Claims 2, 3, and 5 ................................................................... 36 
`1.  Dependent Claim 2: local network ................................................... 36 
`a)  Local network ........................................................................... 36 
`(1)  Vuori .................................................................................. 36 
`(2)  Väänänen ........................................................................... 37 
`(3)  KSR-Combination of Vuori and Väänänen ...................... 38 
`IM Server 198 functioning as a SVMSC .................................. 38 
`(1)  KSR–Modifying IM Server 198 ........................................ 39 
`2.  Dependent Claim 3: Internet ............................................................. 39 
`3.  Dependent Claim 5: delivery to available recipient[s] ..................... 40 
`Independent Claim 14 ............................................................................... 40 
`1.  Additional limitations in claim 14 .................................................... 42 
`a) 
`[14.P]: a plurality of packet-switched networks ....................... 42 
`b) 
`[14.1a]: local network ............................................................... 42 
`c) 
`[14.1b]: external recipients connected to an external network . 43 
`
`b) 
`
`F. 
`
`
`
`- ii -
`
`

`
`
`
`d) 
`
`H. 
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`[14.1d]: transmission over the local network and the external
`network ...................................................................................... 43 
`[14.2a]: a server connected to the external network ................. 44 
`e) 
`[14.2c]: delivery over the external network .............................. 44 
`f) 
`G.  Dependent claims 15, 17, and 19 ............................................................. 44 
`1.  Dependent Claim 15: local server .................................................... 44 
`2.  Dependent Claim 17: Internet ........................................................... 47 
`3.  Dependent Claim 19: delivery to available recipient[s] ................... 47 
`Independent Claim 28 ............................................................................... 47 
`1.  Additional Limitations in Claim 28 .................................................. 50 
`a) 
`[28.P]: a plurality of packet-switched networks ....................... 50 
`b) 
`[28.1a]: external network .......................................................... 50 
`c) 
`[28.1b]: recipients connected to a local network ...................... 50 
`d) 
`[28.1d]: transmission over the external network ...................... 50 
`e) 
`[28.2a], [28.2b]: external server system ................................... 51 
`f) 
`[28.2c]: routing .......................................................................... 51 
`g) 
`[28.3a], [28.3b], [28.3e]: local server receiving and delivering
`the message ............................................................................... 52 
`2.  Dependent Claim 29: external recipients .......................................... 53 
`3.  Dependent Claim 31: Internet ........................................................... 54 
`4.  Dependent Claim 33: delivery to available recipient[s] ................... 55 
`Independent Claim 40 ............................................................................... 55 
`1.  Dependent Claim 42: delivery to available recipient[s] ................... 56 
`Independent Claim 51 ............................................................................... 57 
`1.  Dependent Claim 53: delivery to available recipient[s] ................... 59 
`Independent Claim 62 ............................................................................... 59 
`1.  Dependent Claim 64: delivery to available recipient[s] ................... 61 
`VII. Ground 2: Vuori, Väänänen, and Deshpande Render Obvious Claims 4, 18,
`32, 41, 52, 63. ................................................................................................... 61 
`A.  Dependent claims 4, 18, 32, 41, 52, and 63: server providing a list of
`recipients for client selection. ................................................................... 61 
`
`I. 
`
`J. 
`
`K. 
`
`
`
`- iii -
`
`

`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`1.  Dependent Claim 4 ........................................................................... 61 
`a)  Vuori-Väänänen ........................................................................ 61 
`b)  Deshpande ................................................................................. 61 
`c)  KSR ............................................................................................ 62 
`2.  Dependent Claim 18 ......................................................................... 63 
`3.  Dependent Claim 32 ......................................................................... 64 
`4.  Dependent Claim 41 ......................................................................... 65 
`5.  Dependent Claim 52 ......................................................................... 65 
`6.  Dependent Claim 63 ......................................................................... 65 
`Ground 3: Vuori, Väänänen, and Abburi Render Obvious Claims 6,
`VIII. 
`20, 34, 43, 54, and 65. ...................................................................................... 66 
`A.  Dependent Claims 6, 20, 34, 43, 54, 65: audio file .................................. 66 
`1.  Claim 6 .............................................................................................. 66 
`a)  Vuori-Väänänen ........................................................................ 66 
`b)  Abburi ....................................................................................... 67 
`c)  KSR ............................................................................................ 67 
`2.  Claim 20 ............................................................................................ 68 
`3.  Claim 34 ............................................................................................ 68 
`4.  Claim 43 ............................................................................................ 69 
`5.  Claim 54 ............................................................................................ 69 
`6.  Claim 65 ............................................................................................ 69 
`IX.  Ground 4: Vuori, Väänänen, Abburi, and Daniell Render Obvious Claim
`68. ..................................................................................................................... 70 
`A.  Dependent Claim 68: file attachment ....................................................... 70 
`a)  Vuori-Väänänen -Abburi .......................................................... 70 
`b)  Daniell ....................................................................................... 70 
`c)  KSR ............................................................................................ 71 
`X.  Mandatory notices under 37 C.F.R. §42.8 ....................................................... 72 
`A.  Real parties-in-interest (§42.8(b)(1)) ....................................................... 72 
`B.  Notice of related matters (§42.8(b)(2)) .................................................... 72 
`
`
`
`- iv -
`
`

`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`C.  Lead and back-up counsel with service information (§42.8(b)(3) and
`(4)) ............................................................................................................ 76 
`XI.  Grounds for standing ........................................................................................ 76 
`XII. Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 77 
`
`
`
`
`
`- v -
`
`

`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`EXHIBIT
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`1001
`
`1002 
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`Rojas, U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890 (filed December 18, 2003, issued
`May 19, 2009).  
`
`File History for U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890.
`
`Declaration of Leonard J. Forys, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Leonard J. Forys, Ph.D.
`
`Vuori, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0146097 (filed
`July 23, 2001, published October 10, 2002).
`
`Wu et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0023131
`(filed March 19, 2001, published February 21, 2002).
`
`Malik, U.S. Patent No. 7,123,695 (filed August 19, 2002, issued
`October 17, 2006).
`
`Väänänen, WO Patent Publication No. 02/17658 (filed August 20,
`2001, published February 28, 2002).
`
`Deshpande, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0046273
`(filed August 28, 2001, published March 6, 2003).
`
`Daniell et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`2004/0068545, (filed December 19, 2002, published April 8, 2004).
`
`Aoki et al., “The IMX Architecture Interoperability with America
`Online’s Instant Messaging Services,” June 15, 2000.
`
`Excerpts from Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 5th ed. (2002).
`
`Excerpt from Webster’s New World College Dictionary, 4th ed.,
`New York: Macmillan, 1999.
`
`Staack et al., WO Patent Publication No. 02/07396 (filed July 13,
`2000, published January 24, 2002).
`
`
`
`- vi -
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT
`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`DESCRIPTION
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`Abburi, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0147512 (filed
`February 1, 2002, published August 7, 2003).
`
`Old Version of AOL Instant Messenger 2.1 Download, retrieved
`from http://www.oldapps.com/aim.php?old_aim=4#screenshots.
`
`Clarke et al., Experiments with packet switching of voice traffic, IEE
`Proceedings G - Electronic Circuits and Systems , V.130, N.4 , pp.
`105-113 (August 1983).
`
`Sharma, VoP (voice over packet), IEEE Potentials, V. 21, N. 4,
`October/November 2002, pp. 14-17.
`
`Schuh et al., WO Patent Publication No. 2003/024027 (filed August
`21, 2002, published March 20, 2003).
`
`Lotito et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,625,081 (filed November 30, 1982,
`issued November 25, 1986).
`
`Pershan, U.S. Patent No. 5,260,986 (filed April 23, 1991, issued
`November 9, 1993).
`
`Hogan et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,619,554 (filed June 8, 1994, issued
`April 8, 1997).
`
`International Telecommunication Union, General Aspects of Digital
`Transmission Systems, Terminal Equipments, Pulse Code
`Modulation (PCM) of Voice Frequencies, ITU-T Recommendation
`G.711., pp. 1-10 (ITU 1993).
`
`Oouchi et al., Study on Appropriate Voice Data Length of IP Packets
`for VoIP Network Adjustment, Proceedings of the IEEE Global
`Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2002, V. 2, Taipei,
`Taiwan, 2002, pp. 1618–1622.
`
`Locascio, U.S. Patent No. 6,603,757 (filed April 14, 1999, issued
`August 5, 2003).
`
`Peersman et al., The Global System for Mobile Communications
`Short Message Service, IEEE Personal Communications (June 2000).
`
`
`
`- vii -
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT
`
`1027
`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`DESCRIPTION
`
`SMPP v3.4 Protocol Implementation guide for GSM / UMTS (May
`30, 2002).
`
`1028
`
`Webster’s New World Dictionary and Thesaurus, 2nd ed. (2002).
`
`
`
`This Exhibit list covers two inter partes review petitions being filed against
`
`the ’890 patent. Not all exhibits are used in each petition, but all are used in the
`
`single declaration that supports both petitions.
`
`
`
`- viii -
`
`

`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`
`
`I.
`
`Introduction
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890 (Ex. 1001, “’890 Patent”) is directed to an instant
`
`voice messaging system for delivering instant messages over a packet-switched
`
`network. (’890 Patent, Abstract.) The inventor incorrectly perceived that “no
`
`instant messaging vendor is concentrating on voice” at the time. (Ex. 1002, ’890
`
`Patent File History, 96.) The alleged “innovation,” characterized by the inventor, is
`
`nothing more than “instant voice,” by combining well-known instant messaging
`
`(IM) features in a voice messaging system, as admitted during prosecution. (Id.,
`
`90, 96.)
`
`The Examiner erroneously issued the ’890 Patent alleging a patentable
`
`limitation that was a well-known IM technique and already applied in many voice-
`
`messaging systems:
`
`a server that temporarily stores an instant voice message if a recipient
`is unavailable and delivers the stored instant voice message when the
`recipient becomes available.
`(Id., 45.)
`
`For example, Vuori teaches that a voice IM server temporarily stores the
`
`voice message for the unavailable recipient until the server delivers the message
`
`when the recipient later becomes available. (Ex. 1005, Vuori, [0050]-[0051].)
`
`In addition, all other limitations of the challenged claims were broadly
`
`applied and well known in the industry, and there was nothing novel about how
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`those limitations were combined. Accordingly, the Petition should be granted and
`
`
`
`trial instituted on all the challenged claims as set forth below.
`
`II. Requirements under 37 C.F.R. § 42.104
`
`A.
`
`Identification of challenge and statement of relief requested
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests inter partes review and cancellation of
`
`challenged claims based on eight grounds in two petitions as follows:
`
`Ground Statute
`1
`§ 103
`
`2
`
`3
`
`§ 103
`
`§ 103
`
`Prior Art
`Vuori1 and Väänänen2
`
`Petition 1 (This Petition)
`Claims
`1-3, 5, 14, 15,
`17, 19, 28, 29,
`31, 33, 40, 42,
`51, 53, 62, 64
`4, 18, 32, 41,
`52, 63
`6, 20, 34, 43,
`54, 65
`
`Vuori, Väänänen, and
`Deshpande3
`Vuori, Väänänen, and Abburi4
`
`
`1 Vuori (Ex. 1005) published on October 10, 2002, and is prior art under §102(b).
`
`2 Väänänen (Ex. 1008) published on February 28, 2002, and is prior art under
`
`§102(b).
`
`3 Deshpande (Ex. 1009) filed on August 28, 2001, published March 6, 2003, and is
`
`prior art under §§102(a) and 102(e).
`
`4 Abburi (Ex. 1015) filed on February 1, 2002, published on August 7, 2003 , and
`
`is prior art under §§102(a) and 102(e).
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`
`Ground Statute
`4
`§ 103
`
`Ground Statute
`5
`§ 103
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`§ 103
`
`§ 103
`
`§ 103
`
`Petition 1 (This Petition)
`Claims
`68
`
`Prior Art
`Vuori, Väänänen, Abburi, and
`Daniell5
`Petition 2
`Claims
`Prior Art
`Malik6 and Väänänen
`1-3, 5, 14, 15,
`17, 19, 28, 29,
`31, 33, 40, 42,
`51, 53, 62, 64
`4, 18, 32, 41,
`52, 63
`6, 20, 34, 43,
`54, 65
`68
`
`Malik, Väänänen, and
`Deshpande
`Malik, Väänänen, and Abburi
`
`Malik, Väänänen, Abburi, and
`Daniell
`
`B. Meaningful distinction between Vuori and Malik
`
`The Vuori and Malik Grounds have meaningful distinctions. (Ex. 1003,
`
`Forys Dec., ¶¶102-05.)
`
`Vuori better teaches “[the client] select[ing] one or more [] recipients” in the
`
`challenged independent claims. Vuori explicitly discloses that the user “select[s]7
`
`one or more intended recipients.” (Vuori, [0033].) Malik discloses that its client
`
`
`5 Daniell (Ex. 1010) filed December 19, 2002, and is prior art under §102(e).
`
`6 Malik (Ex. 1007) filed August 19, 2002, and is prior art under §102(e).
`
`7 All emphasis added unless otherwise noted.
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`“receives a request or prompt by” the sending user to send a message, without
`
`
`
`explicitly disclosing recipient selection. (Malik, 6:7-9.)
`
`Vuori also better teaches “[the client] transmitting the selected [] recipients”
`
`in the challenged independent claims. Vuori explicitly discloses its client transmits
`
`the “SVM along with the encoded information designating the intended
`
`recipient.” (Vuori, [0056].) Malik does not explicitly disclose its client
`
`transmitting the recipient information.
`
`On the other hand, Malik better teaches the “local server” in independent
`
`claims 28, 62, and dependent claim 15. Malik discloses that its server can be a
`
`local server. (Malik, 2:66-3:1, 4:45-47.) Vuori does not explicitly label any of its
`
`servers as a “local server.”
`
`The Board should institute both the Vuori and Malik Grounds.
`
`III. The ’890 Patent
`
`A. Overview
`
`The ’890 Patent is directed to “an instant voice messaging system” for
`
`“delivering instant messages over a packet-switched network.” (’890 Patent,
`
`Abstract.) The ’890 Patent’s system comprises a client, a server, and selected
`
`recipient[s] connected through a network. (Id., 2:49-60.) At the client, one or more
`
`recipients may be selected, and an instant voice message is generated. (Id.) The
`
`selected recipient[s] and the generated message are transmitted over the network to
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`the server. (Id.) The server delivers the received message to the selected
`
`
`
`recipient[s] over the network. (Id.) The selected recipient[s] can audibly play the
`
`message. (Id.)
`
`The ’890 Patent’s server provides “contact presence (connection)
`
`information and message scheduling and delivery” for the connected recipient[s].
`
`(Id., 14:60-63.) For example, when the server receives an instant voice message, if
`
`the recipient is not connected to the server (i.e., unavailable), the server
`
`temporarily saves the message and delivers the message when the recipient[s] is
`
`available. (Id., 8:22-29.)
`
`B. Claims
`
`1.
`
`Independent Claims
`
`The challenged claims include six sets of claims. Claims 1, 14, 28, 40, 51,
`
`and 62 are the independent claims. Claim 1 is representative8:
`
` An instant voice messaging system for delivering instant
`messages over a packet-switched network,
`the system
`comprising:
` a client connected to the network, the client
`o selecting one or more recipients,
`o generating an instant voice message therefor, and
`
`
`8 Formatting added.
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`o transmitting the selected recipients and the instant voice
`message therefor over the network; and
` a server connected to the network, the server
`o receiving the selected recipients and the instant voice
`message therefor, and
`o delivering the instant voice message to the selected
`recipients over the network,
` the selected recipients enabled to audibly play the instant voice
`message, and
` the server
`o temporarily storing the instant voice message if a
`selected recipient is unavailable and
`o delivering the stored instant voice message to the
`selected recipient once the selected recipient becomes
`available.
`(’890 Patent, Claim 1.)
`
`The other independent claims recite substantially similar limitations. The
`
`differences among the independent claims mostly relate to various types of
`
`network(s) connecting the client, server(s), and recipient(s). Based on these
`
`differences, the six independent claims can be categorized into three groups. (Forys
`
`Dec., ¶56.)
`
`Group 1: independent claims 1 and 40 relate to a system/method for
`
`delivering an instant voice message over a packet-switched network. The
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`

`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`“client,” “server,” and “recipient(s)” are all connected to this network. (Forys Dec.,
`
`
`
`¶57.)
`
`Group 2: independent claims 14 and 51 relate to a system/method for
`
`delivering an instant voice message over a plurality of packet-switched networks
`
`(including “local network” and “external network”).The “client” is connected to
`
`the “local network.” The “[external] server” and the “external recipient(s)” are
`
`connected to the “external network.” (Forys Dec., ¶58.)
`
`Group 3: independent claims 28 and 62 also relate to a system/method for
`
`delivering an instant voice message over a plurality of packet-switched networks
`
`(including “local network” and “external network”). However, the message flow of
`
`claims 28 and 62 is almost the reverse of claims 14 and 51. In claims 28 and 62,
`
`the “client” is connected to the “external network” while the “recipient(s)” in are
`
`connected to the “local network.” Claims 28 and 62 further recite an “external
`
`server” connected to the “external network,” and a “local server” connected to the
`
`“local network.” In addition, the “external server” forwards the instant voice
`
`message to the “local server” for delivery because claims 28 and 62 recite that the
`
`“external server” routes and the “local server” receives the message. (Forys Dec.,
`
`¶59.)
`
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`

`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`
`2.
`
`Dependent Claims
`
`The challenged dependent claims recite additional well-known limitations.
`
`Claim 2 relates to a local network. Claims 3, 17, 31 relate to the Internet. Claims 5,
`
`19, 33, 42, 53, 64 relate to delivering the message to available recipient[s]. Claims
`
`4, 18, 32, 41, 52, 63 relate to the server providing a list of recipients for client
`
`selection. Claims 6, 20, 34, 43, 54, 65 relate to recording, transmitting, and
`
`delivering the message in the form of an audio file. (Forys Dec., ¶60.)
`
`In addition, claim 15 recites a local server receiving and delivering the
`
`message to local recipient[s]. Claim 29 recites “external recipient[s]” connected to
`
`the external network. Claim 68 relates to file attachment and storage. (Forys Dec.,
`
`¶61.)
`
`C.
`
`Prosecution History
`
`The Examiner allowed the ’890 Patent because the applied references
`
`supposedly fail to teach or render obvious “a server that temporarily stores an
`
`instant voice message if a recipient is unavailable and delivers the stored instant
`
`voice message when the recipient becomes available.” (’890 File History, 45.) But
`
`a server storing-or-delivering an instant voice message based on recipient
`
`availability was widely known well before the earliest possible priority date of the
`
`’890 Patent. (Forys Dec., ¶63.)
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`

`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`Patentee did submit a §1.131 affidavit alleging a conception date before
`
`August 15, 2003. (’890 File History, 89-135.) Even if the affidavit meets §1.131
`
`standards, which it does not, all the applied references in this Petition are still prior
`
`art.
`
`IV. Claim construction9
`
`A.
`
`POSITA
`
`Regarding the ’890 Patent, a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSITA)
`
`would have at least the equivalent of a Bachelor degree in Electrical Engineering,
`
`Computer Science, or an equivalent field as well as at least 3–5 years of academic
`
`or industry experience in communications systems, messaging systems, data
`
`networks including VoIP, and mobile telephony, or comparable industry
`
`experience. (Forys Dec., ¶30.)
`
`B.
`
`“External Network”
`
`Independent claims 14, 28, 51, and 62 recite an “external network.” Under
`
`the BRI, the term “external network” means “a network that is outside another
`
`
`9 Proposed constructions are for inter partes review only and Petitioner
`
`reserves the right to revisit constructions in litigation. Petitioner further reserves
`
`the right to challenge indefiniteness of all claim terms in litigation.
`
`
`
`- 9 -
`
`

`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`network.” (Forys Dec., ¶64.) One example would be the Internet, as found in
`
`
`
`dependent claims 17 and 31.
`
`The context of the claims supports this construction. The claims recite “an
`
`external network outside the local network.” (’890 Patent, Claims 14, 51.) The
`
`plain meaning of the word “external” further supports this construction. (Ex. 1013,
`
`Webster’s, 503 (defining “external” as “on or having to do with the outside; outer;
`
`exterior”).) (Forys Dec., ¶65.)
`
`The context of the claims also supports that the Internet is an example of the
`
`“external network,” reciting, “wherein the external network is the Internet.” (’890
`
`Patent, Claims 17, 31; Forys Dec., ¶66.)
`
`The specification does not provide an embodiment that specifically refers to
`
`the term “external network.” The specification only recites the claimed “external
`
`network” in Section “SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION,” with the same level of
`
`details as the claims (e.g., reciting “an external network outside the local
`
`network”). (’890 Patent, 3:24-4:26.) (Forys Dec., ¶67.)
`
`
`
`- 10 -
`
`

`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`FIG. 5 of the ’890 Patent provides an exemplary “global instant voice
`
`messaging (IVM) system 500” that utilizes both local networks and/or the
`
`Internet.10 (’890 Patent, 15:24-25.) (Forys Dec., ¶68.)
`
`(’890 Patent, FIG. 5.)
`
`In FIG. 5, the “global IVM system 500 comprises the local IVM system 510,
`
`global IVM server system 502, and global IVM clients 506 and 508 that are
`
`optionally connected via local IP network 504.” (’890 Patent, 15:28-31.) The
`
`
`
`
`10 However, this embodiment does not explicitly refer to the term, “external
`
`network.”
`
`
`
`- 11 -
`
`

`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`Internet and/or local networks allow local clients and global clients to
`
`
`
`communicate messages with each other: “global IVM server system 502 is
`
`connected to the IP network (i.e., Internet) 102 for enabling the local IVM clients
`
`206, 208…in the local IVM system 510 to generate and send instant voice
`
`messages to the global IVM clients 506, 508, as well as the local IVM clients 206,
`
`208 to receive instant voice messages from the global IVM clients 506, 508.” (’890
`
`Patent, 15:31-38, FIG. 5.)
`
`Accordingly, based on the claim context, the plain meaning, and the
`
`specification, the term “external network” means “a network that is outside another
`
`network.” (Forys Dec., ¶70.)
`
`V.
`
`State of the Art
`
`Prior to the alleged invention, all the technology at issue was broadly applied
`
`and well known in the field of messaging systems. (Forys Dec., ¶71.) No
`
`individual elements of the challenged claims were novel at the time, and there was
`
`nothing novel about how those elements were combined. (Id.) Further, there were
`
`no technological barriers to combining these elements. (Id.)
`
`As explained by Apple’s expert Dr. Forys, with 50 years of relevant
`
`experience, voice messaging, SMS, and voice over packet networks are all
`
`decades-old technologies. (Forys Dec., ¶¶88-100.) The additional features in the
`
`challenged claims were also widely known. (Forys Dec., ¶71.)
`
`
`
`- 12 -
`
`

`
`
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,535,890
`Storing-or-delivering an instant voice message based on recipient
`availability was well-known.
`
`A.
`
`Recipient availability information was well-known to early AOL
`
`subscribers. (Forys Dec., ¶72.) AOL’s Instant Messenger provided presence
`
`information (e.g., “online” indications) as early as 1997. (Ex. 1016, 1; Forys Dec.,
`
`¶72.)
`
`Using recipient availability information, many IM systems already utilized
`
`the technique of queuing text IMs for later delivery once the recipients become
`
`available. (Malik, 3:24-26.) In “many instant messaging communications, if a user
`
`is not present to receive an instant message, the instant message can still be …
`
`queued in the IM server.” (Id., 3:16-18.) The IM Server “will hold the message
`
`until the user is present again on the instant messaging network.” (Id., 3:20-21.)
`
`So,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket