US. Patent 7,116,710
`' Apple vs. California Institute _of Technology
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`‘ Apple Inc.
`' Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`1 California Institute of Technology
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR2017—00219
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SUBMIT REPLACEMENT EXHIBITS
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(¢)
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 161106060v.1
`
`

`

`US. Patent 7,116,710
`.
`Apple vs. California Institute of Technology
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(c), Petitioner Apple Inc. respectfully
`
`requests that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) grant leave to the 9
`
`Petitioner to submit replacement Exhibits that address inadvertent clerical errors
`' made when filing the following three exhibits in the IPR2017—00210, -00211, and -
`
`00219 petitions:
`
`' Frey, B. J. and MacKay, D. J. C., “Irregular Turbocodes,” Proc. 37th
`Allerton Conf. on COMM, Control and Computing, Monticello, Illinois,
`
`1999 ‘(the “Frey Reference”).
`
`°
`
`' D. Divsalar, H. Jin, and R. J. McEliece, “Coding theorems for ‘turbo—
`like” codes,” Proc. 36th Allerton Conf on Comm, Control and
`I
`V
`
`Condputing, Allerton, Illinois, 1998 (the “Divsalar Reference”).
`° Declaration ofPaul H. Siegel (the “Siegel Declaration”).
`
`Petitioner requested a telephonic hearing on this issue on February 21, 2017,
`
`which the Board‘held on February 24, 2017. At the February 24 hearing, the
`Board directed Petitioner to file this motion under 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(c) together
`
`with the replacement exhibits.
`
`Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth more fully below, Petitioner
`
`respectfully requests that the Board:
`
`(1) replace the Frey Reference originally filed
`
`as Exhibit 1202 with the replacement copy attached as Appendix A to this motion;
`
`ActiveUS 161 1_06060v.l
`
`

`

`US. Patent 7,116,710
`Apple vs. California Institute of Technology
`
`‘ (2) replace the Divsalar Reference originally filed as Exhibit 1203 with the
`
`_ replacement copy attached as Appendix B to this motion; and (3) replace the Siegel
`
`Declaration originally filed as Exhibit 1220 with the replacement copy attached as
`Appendix C to this motion; Patent Owner does not oppose this motion.
`
`1.
`
`APPLICABLE RULE
`
`§ 42.104(c), a party may file a motion “to correct a
`Pursuant to 37
`clerical or typographical mistake in a petition.” The Board has explained that this
`rule is remedial in nature andsubject to liberal interpretation. ABB Inc. v. ROY—G-
`
`B]V Corp, IPR2013—00063, Paper 21 at 7 (PTAB Jan. 16,2013) (citing
`
`Tcherepnin v, Knight, 3819 U.S.‘ 332, 336 (1967)). The Board'has regularly granted
`. motions to correct inadvertent errors related'to the filing of exhibits pursuant to
`
`"42.104(c). See, e.g., Owens Corning v. Certainteed Corpg, IPR2014—01397, Paper
`10 at 2 (PTAB Dec.- 17,2014); Syntroleum Corp. v. Neste Oil OYJ, IPR2013-
`
`00178, Paper 21.at 5 (PTAB July 22, 2013).
`II. >
`‘ FACTS RELEVANT TO THIS MOTION
`
`On November 15, 2016, Petitioner filed three interpartes review petitions in
`
`IPR2017—00210, —00211, and —00219 directed to US. Patent No. 7,116,710.
`
`During the preparation and filing of these petitions, lead counsel Richard
`
`Goldenberg directed that the copies of the Frey Reference, Divsalar Reference, and
`
`ActiveUS 161106060v.1
`
`

`

`US. Patent 7,116,710
`' Apple vs. California Institute of Technology
`
`the Siegel Declaration (attached hereto as Appendices A, B, and C, respectively, to
`distinguish them from originally—filed Exhibits 1202, 1203, and 1220) were to be
`
`filed with the petitions. (Goldenberg Declaration, Ex. 1225, 11116, 9, 10.) In
`
`carrying out these instructions, however, the associate assisting in uploading these
`exhibits, Jonathan E. Barbee,lmistakenly directed legal staffto upload incorrect
`
`copies of the Frey Reference, the Divsalar Reference, and the Siegel Declaration.
`(Barbee Declaration, Ex. 1226, 11114—7.)
`'As explained below, this occurred due to
`
`clerical errors in the preparation of the exhibits to'the petitions.
`
`A.
`
`The Frey Reference
`
`~ Counsel for'Petitioner had several additional copies ofthe Frey Reference in I,
`
`,
`
`the firm’s document management database, including-the inadvertently-filed
`
`exhibit, which lacks a table of contents and a date stamp. The associate assisting
`
`with uploading the exhibits, Mr. Barbee, unintentionally selected the wrong copy
`ofthe Frey Reference because the inadvertently-filed document had been
`circulated'for a different purpose. (Barbee Declaration, Ex; 1226, 115.) The text of
`
`the replacement Frey Reference is identical to the text ofthe inadvertently-filed
`
`exhibit and will not affect the substance ofthe IPR2017-002lO, —0021 1, and» —
`
`00219 petitions, but merely corrects a clerical error.
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 161106060v.1
`
`

`

`US. Patent 7,116,710
`Apple vs. California Institute of Technology
`
`The inadvertently-filed exhibit lacks page numbering corresponding to the
`
`Table of Contents of the publication in which the Frey Reference was published.
`
`The Table of Contents from that publication was filed as a separate exhibit with the-
`
`IPR2017—00210, ~00211, and —00219 petitions as Ex. 1015, Ex. 1115, and Ex.
`
`1215, respectively. The Table ofContents bears the same date stamp as the.
`replacement Frey Reference (i.e., March 20, 2000 from the Cornell University
`
`1 Library) and indicates that the first page is page 241. The paginatiOn ofthe
`
`.
`
`inadvertently—filed Frey exhibit does not match the pagination identified in the
`
`Table of Contents in Ex. 1015, Ex. 1115, and Ex. 1215 because the inadvertently—
`
`filed Frey exhibit begins atpage 1. In the replacement Frey Reference, the first.
`
`page of the exhibit is page 241, which matches the pagination indicated in the
`
`Table of Contents of the publication in which the Frey Reference Was published, as
`shown in Ex, 1015,,Ex. 1115, and EX. 1215.
`
`B.
`
`The Divsalar Reference
`
`Counsel for Petitioner cited to the DivsalarReference in‘the IPR2017-00210,
`—0021 1, and .-00219 petitions using sequential page numbering that designated the
`
`first page as page 1, whereas the inadvertently—filed exhibit bears only sequential
`page numbering that begins with page 201. The associate assisting in uploading
`
`7
`
`the exhibits, Mr; Barbee, inadvertently directed legal staff to upload the Divsalar
`
`ActiveUS 161106060v.l
`
`

`

`’ U.S. Patent 7,116,710
`Apple vs. California Institute of Technology
`
`Reference without adding sequential page numbers beginning with page 1 below
`
`the original page numbers ofthe exhibit. (Barbee Declaration, Ex. 1226, 116.) The
`
`addition of the sequential page numbers was needed for the Divsalar Reference to
`
`match the citations 'in the IPR2017—00210, —0021 1, and —00219 petitions. The
`
`replacement Divsalar Reference is identical to the inadvertently—filed exhibit
`
`except for the addition of the sequential page numbers and Will not affect the ‘
`
`substance of the IPR2017—00210, -00211, and ~00219 petitions, but merely corrects
`
`a clerical error.
`
`C.
`
`The Siegel Declaration '
`
`Petitioner obtained from Professor Paul. H. Siegel a declaration that includes
`an attachment called “Exhibit 1.” “Exhibit 1” to the Siegel Declaration was
`inadvertently omitted, hoWever, when the associate assisting with the exhibits, Mr.
`Barbee, directed legal. staffto upload this declaration. (Barbee Declaration, Ex.
`
`1226, 117.).
`
`Specifically, the Siegel Declaration and “Exhibit 1” were sent by Professor
`Siegel to counsel for Petitioneriin separate emails. Mr. Barbee inadvertently
`
`overlooked the email forwarding “Exhibit 1” in the process ofpreparing the Siegel
`
`Declaration for filing. A copy of the same presentation in “Exhibit 1” was filed
`
`with the IPR2017-00210, -00211, and —00219 petitions as Ex. 1005, Ex. 1105,and ‘
`
`ActiveUS 161106060v.l
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent 7,116,710
`Apple vs. California Institute of Technology ~
`
`Ex. 1205, respectively. This is because the Siegel Declaration was submitted to 0
`
`demonstrate that Ex. 1005, Ex. 1105, and Ex. 1205 were true and accurate copies
`ofthe presentation. The replacement Siegel Declaration] is identical to the
`
`inadvertently—filed exhibit except for the addition of “Exhibit 1”, which is identical
`
`to Ex. 1005, Ex. 1105, and Ex. 1205‘in IPR2017-00210, —0021 1, and -00219,
`
`respectively (specifically, all are copies of the presentation entitled “The Serial
`Concatenation ofRate—1 Codes Through Uniform Random Interleavers,” which is
`
`identified by name on p. 3 of the Siegel Declaration), and will not affect the
`substance ofthe IPR2017-00210, -00211, and -00219 petitions, but merely corrects
`
`p a clerical error.
`
`~_
`
`i
`
`I
`
`III.
`
`THIS MorroN Is UNOPP-QSED
`
`While Patent Owner (California Institute of Technology, or “Caltech”) does .
`
`‘
`
`not acquiesce to any factual assertions made by the Petitioner in its motion or
`
`corresponding supporting documents, Caltech does not oppose the relief requested 0
`
`in this motion in that replacement documents are accepted for the Frey Reference,
`the Divsalar Reference, and the Siegel declaration. During the hearing on
`February 24, 2017, the Board explained that, due to the filing ofthe corrected
`exhibits, and should Caltech not oppose the requested replacement ofexhibits, the
`
`Patent Owner would receive a one-month extension of the deadline for filing its
`
`ActiveUS 161106060v.1
`
`

`

`US. Patent 7,116,710
`Apple vs. California Institute ofTechnology
`
`Preliminary Patent Owner Response, making that response due on April 3.
`
`Petitioner does ‘not oppose the One-month extension for filing ofthe Preliminary I
`
`Patent Owner Response.
`
`THE INADVERTENT-ERRORS IN THE FREY REFERENCE, THE DIVSALAR
`IV.)
`REFERENCE, AND THE SIEGEL DECLARATION ARE CLERICAL ERRORS THAT
`SHOULD BE CORRECTED
`'
`
`The inadvertent errors. in the filing ofthe Frey Reference, the Divsalar I
`
`Reference, and the Siegel Declaration should be corrected because correcting these
`
`clerical errors will not prejudice Patent OWner andwill not affect the substance of
`the petitions in IPR2017—00210, ~00211, and -00219. The substance ofthe
`replacementcopies ofthe Frey Reference, the Divsalar Reference, and the Siegel
`Declaration is identical to the inadvertently—filed exhibits. As explained above, the
`
`differences between the replacement copies and the inadvertently—filed exhibits are
`
`clerical in nature.
`
`V.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that Ex. 1202 (the
`
`Frey Reference), Ex. 1203 (the DiVsalar Reference), and Ex. 1220 (the Siegel
`
`Declaration) to the petition in the above-captioned interpartes review proceeding
`be replaced with the replacement copies attached to this motion as Appendices A,
`
`B, and C, respectively.
`
`V ActiveUS 161106060v.l
`
`

`

`US Patent 7,116,710
`Apple vs. California Institute of Technology
`
`Dated: February 28, 2017
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`I
`
`/Dom'inic E. Massa/
`
`Dominic E. Massa
`
`Registration No. 44,905
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`Tel: (617) 526-6386
`Fax: (617) 526-5000
`
`Attorneyfor Petitioner
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 161106060v.l
`
`

`

`US. Patent 7,116,710
`Apple vs. CalifOrnia Institute of Technology
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on February 28, 2017, a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing MOTION TO SUBMIT REPLACEMENT EXHIBITS PURSUANT TO
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.104(c) and Petitioner’s Updated Exhibit List were served Via
`
`electronic mail upon the following attorneys of record:
`
`Michael Rosato (mrosato@wsgr.com)
`Matthew Argenti (margenti@wsgr.com)
`Richard Torczon (rtorczon@wsgr.com)
`
`
`/Dominic E. Massa/
`
`'
`
`Dominic E. Massa
`Registration No. 44,905
`
`ActiveUS 161106060v.l
`
`

`

`I AppendixA }
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`septemher '22 ~ 24, 2995:
`
`Anetta}; fiaase, Manticgfie, lilinais
`h
`Sgansamfi by this
`V
`i h ‘
`Cmrdinated Science Labaxamry and t e
`Department 9%” Eiectrical and Cempntcr Engineering :3. t e
`{Iniversi’ty {if Iiiinois at Urbana-Chamimigfi
`Appie v, Caltech
`IPR2017-00219
`
`Replacement - Apple 1202
`
`‘ HUGHE800883604 _
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I *3'1324 @7349 mi?
`
`
`
`"ATION,
`
`

`

`UNIVERSXTY LIBRARY
`
`
`‘ll ill Hill!
`
`
`
`“lull!” .
`
`
`E 0
`
`77 849 721
`
`PROCEEDINGS
`
`THIRTY~SEVENTH ANNUAL ALLER’I‘ON CONFERENCE
`ON COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND COMPUTING
`
`CORN ELL
`
`’ Willi} llmu
`1924
`
`
`
`
`Bruce l‘lajek
`RS. Srcenivas
`Conference C0~Clmirs
`
`
`
`Conference held
`September 22, September 23, and September 24, 1999
`Allerton House
`Monticello, Illinois
`
`Sponsored by
`The Coordinated Science Laboratory
`Tlxe Department of Electrigaylind Computer Engineering
`UNIVERSI'F‘gtlgl? ILLINOIS ‘
`Urbalxa-gltlampaign
`
`HUGHESOO883605
`
`x"
`
`- f:
`
`
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`.
`
`,.,.,.,........nn.n...uno.nun"nun-uu-n-vuu Inn-ou-uun-unnuunn - u
`.
`. u ‘
`
`I-A: STQCHASTIC NETWORKS I
`Organizexs; S.P. Meyn and R. Srikant
`-
`(University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign)
`S.P. Meyn
`'
`(University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
`
`Chair:
`
`REPRESENTATION AND EXPANSION OF (MAX, PLUS) LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS
`F. Baccelli, S. Gaubcrt, and 1). Hang
`
`.............................,.
`
`1
`
`""""""
`
`MARTINGALB PROBLEMS AND LINEAR PROGRAMS FOR SINGULAR CONTROL ........................................
`TG. Kurtz and RH. Stockbn'dgc
`‘
`
`1!
`
`STATIONARY REFLEC’I‘ED LEVY PROCESSES IN STOCI'IASTIC NETWORKS
`T. Konstantopoulos and G. Last
`~
`
`............................................... 21
`_
`
`ON THE IMPACT OF VARIABILITY ON THE BUFFER DYNAMICS IN 1P NETWORKS ....................................... 30
`Y. 100, V. Ribeiro, A, Feldmann, AC. Gilbert, and W. Willinger
`‘
`‘ QUEUEING NETWORKS WITH INTERACTING SERVICE RESOURCES ................
`.....................;......................... 42
`M. Armony and N. Bambos
`_
`
`I‘B‘ CODING THEORY I: DECODING AND CHANNELS
`Organizers: R. Keener and RE. Blahut
`(University of Illinois at UI'bana~Champaign)
`Chair: A. Vardy
`(University ofCalifomia, San Diego)
`A NEW UPPER BOUND ON THE RELIABILITY FUNCTION OF THE GAUSSIAN CHANNEL............................. 52
`A. Ashikhmin, A. Barg, and S. thsyn
`'
`'
`.
`RECURSIVE DECODING OF REED-MULLER CODES...........................................................'....................................... 61 '
`I. Dumer
`_
`
`L03313333 COMPRESSION IN CONSTRAINBD CODING ...........................................................
`J.L. Fan, B. Marcus, and R. Roth
`
`............................... 7o
`
`I-C: IIYBRID/DISCRETE-EVENT~DYNAMIC SYSTEMS
`Chair: RS. Sreenivas
`(University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
`
`MODELLING or TIMED DISCRETE EVENT SYSTEMS ............................................................................................., 75
`RS. Minhas and WM. Wonham
`’
`_
`
`INTERACIING DISCRETE EVENT SYSTEMS ........................................'....................................................................... 35
`S. Abdelwahed and WM. Wonham
`I
`I
`
`STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR INTERCONNECTED HYBRID SYSTEMS ...........................................
`S. Yamamoto and T. Ushio
`»
`
`....................... 93
`
`iv
`
`HUGHE800883606
`
`

`

`‘I
`
`
`
`DECENTRALIZED SUPERVISORY CONTROL OF CONCURRENT DISCRETE EVENT SYSTEMS
`WITH PARTIAL OBSERVATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 103
`S. Jiang and R. Kumar
`'
`.
`‘
`'
`
`A NEW PROBABILISTIC APPROACH TO CONGESTION CONTROL IN COMMUNICATION NETWORKS... 113
`‘ H. Mortazavian and J. Mirkovic
`‘
`
`A BIGRAPH MATCHING THEOREM....................................................
`S. Ayyorgun and KL. Cruz
`
`........................................................................ 124
`
`1-D: ACTIVE NETWORKS
`.
`Organizer/Chair: Y. Shavitt
`(Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies)
`
`CHUNKS IN PLAN: LANGUAGE SUPPORT FOR PROGRAMS AS PACKETS...........................................
`131‘. Moore, M. Hicks, and S. Names,
`>
`
`........... 127
`
`ON THE INTERFACE 0F PROGRAMMABLE NETWORK ELEMENTS ................................................................... 137
`G. Hjélmtysson
`‘
`-
`~
`
`' I47
`' BOWMAN AND CANES: IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ACTIVE NETWORK ........................................................ ..
`S. Merugu, S. matacharjce, Y. Chae, M. Sanders, K. Calvert, and
`Zegura
`DESIGN OF‘A FLEXIBLE OPEN PLATFORM FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE ACTIVE NETWORKS .................... 157
`S. Choi, I). Decasper, J. Dehart, R. Keller, J. Lockwood, J. Turner, and T. Wolf
`_
`IMPLEMENTING A CONCAST SERVICE ...................................................................................................................... 166
`K. Calvert, J. Gdffioen, B. Mullins, A. Sehgal, and S. Wen
`ACTIVE DISTRIBUTED MANAGEMENT FOR I? NETWORKS.........................................................
`~ R. Kawamura and R. Stadler
`
`176 ~
`
`........
`
`............
`
`l-F: SPACE-TIME METHODS FOR COMMUNICATION
`Chair: D. Saryvate
`(University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign)
`NEW APPROACH FOR SPACE-TIME TRANSMITTER/RECEIVER DESIGN .......................................................... 186
`H. El Gama! and AR. Hammons, Jr.
`
`INTERFERENCE SUPPRESSION FOR CDMA VIA A SPACEJI‘IME POWER
`MINIMIZATION BASED PREPROCESSOR WITH APPLICATIONS To GPS........................................................... 196
`W.L. Myrick, MD. Zoltowski, and 1.8. Goldstein
`sOFT-WEIOIITED TRANSMIT DIVERSITY FOR WCDMA.......................;............................................................... 204
`A. Hottincn, R. Wichman, and D. anan
`
`MULTIUSER DETECTION TECHNIQUES FOR COMBINED ARRAY PROCESSING
`AND SPACE-TIME BLOCK CODING..............................................................................................................................
`B. Lu and X. Wang
`'
`V
`A TRANSMIT ADAPTIVE ANTENNA SCHEME WITH FEEDBACK FOR WIRELESS
`COMMUNICATIONS..........................................................................................................................................................
`Y. Le Pézennec, F. Boixadera, Y. Famine, and N. Whinnett
`
`214
`
`216-
`
`HUGHESOOB83607
`
`

`

`v» —-—....«_.,_.
`
`II-A:
`
`CODING THEORY II: ITERATIVE DECODING AND TURBO CODES
`Organizers: R. Keener and RE. Blahut
`4
`(University ofIllinois at Urbaanhampaign)
`R. Keener
`(Univérsity of Illinois at Urbaanhampaign)
`
`Chair;
`
`221
`
`~2
`
`31
`
`241
`
`CONCENTRATE .....................................................................................;...........................................................................
`T. Richardson and R. Urbanke
`‘
`ENT ENCODING OF LOW-DENSITY PARITY~CHECK CODES....................................................................
`'1‘. Richardson and R. Urbanke
`
`EFFICI
`
`IRREGULAR 'I’URBOCODES............................................................................................................................................
`8.]. Frey and D.J.C. MacKay
`.
`r
`ASI-CYCLIC REPEA’RACCUMULATE CODES .............................................................................................n 249
`ON QU
`R.M. Tanner
`'
`
`THE SE
`
`RIAL CONCATENATION 0F RATE—l CODES THROUGH UNIFORM RANDOM INTERLEAVERS
`H.D. Pfister and RH. Siegel
`
`260
`
`1143: STOCHASTIC NETWORKS 11'
`'
`Organizers:
`‘S.P. Meyn and R. Srikant
`(University ofIllinois at Urbana-Champaign)
`Chair: R. Srikant
`(Univgrsity ofIllinois at Utbana~Champaign)
`
`‘
`ENGTH ASYMPTOTICS FOR MARKOVIAN SERVICE NETWORKS .....................................................
`QUEUE L
`W.A. Massey, and M1. Reiman
`-
`A. Mandelbau‘m‘,
`EXACT ASYMPTOTICS FOR 1»LIMITED EXPONENTIAL POLLING MODELS ....................................................
`W. Chang, 116. Down, and RD. Foley
`ANT RATE FUNCTIONS FOR DISCRETE TIME QUEUES ........................................................................... 288‘
`A3; Ganesh, N. O'Connell, and B. Prabhakar
`
`27o
`
`280
`
`. INVARI
`
`(3E DEVIATIONS AND OPTIMALITY OF THE LARGEST WEIGHTED DELAY
`LAR
`DISCIPLINE ............................................................................................................................................................
`FIRST
`A.L. Stolyar and K. Ramanan
`-
`
`297
`
`TIMATING BUFFER OVERFLOW PROBABILITIES UNDER
`0N ES
`1VIARKOWMODUI.,A"I‘ED INPUTS...................................................................................................................................
`LCh. Paschalidis and S. Vassilaras
`
`306 ‘
`
`BURSTINESS IN GENERALIZED PROCESSOR SHARING QUEUES WITH LONG—TAXLED
`DUCED
`pAUOOOOvthtO-vlvlInnoJiu-y-Iah‘navhvrrlsn...ylts)la..p'1‘-nI-hvt‘OOf ......................................................................................... n
`,IFRAFFIC FLOWS
`S. Borst, O. Boxma, and P. Jelenkovié
`SYMPTOTICS 0F SELECTING THE SHORTEST OF TWO, IMPROVED.................
`M. Mitzenmacher and B. Vb'cking
`
`....................'...............
`
`THE A
`
`325
`
`
`
`vi
`
`HUGHE300883608
`
`

`

`
`
`II—C: LEARNING ALGORITHMS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING
`I
`Organizers: A. Singer and M. Peder
`(University ofIllinois at Urbana»Champnign and Tel Aviv University)
`Chair: M. Peder
`(Tel Aviv University)
`
`'
`
`UNIVERSAL FILTERING AND PREDICTION OF INDIVIDUAL SEQUENCES CORRUPTED BY NOISE .......,. 328
`A. Baruch and N. Merhav
`
`_ FAST RLS LAGUERRE ADAPTIVE FILTERING ......................................................................
`R. Merchcd and AH. Sayed
`
`.................................. 338
`
`MACHINE LEARNING APPLICATIONS IN GRID COMPUTING .............................................................................. 348
`G. Cybcnko, G. Jiang, and D. BiIar
`REDUNDANCY OF THE LEMPELJZIV CODES ..........................
`SA. Savari
`
`............................................................................... 358
`
`THE INFORMATION BOTTLENECK METHOD ..........................................;.._..L..........;................................................ 368
`‘N. Tishby, RC, Pcreim, and W. Bialek
`
`THEORY MEETS PRACTICE: UNIVERSAL SOURCE CODING WITH TIIE BURROWS WHEELER
`TRANSFORM .......................... .._..........................................................................................................................................
`M. Effros
`'
`
`378
`
`.
`ILI): OPTICAL NETWORKS I
`Organizers: M. Médard and E. Modiano _
`(University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
`and Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
`Chair: E. Mediano
`(Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology)
`OPTICAL SPACE COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING..............
`V.W.S. Chan
`
`................................................................... 388
`
`ON THE BENEFITS OF CONFIGURABILITY IN WDM NETWORKS ..._.................................................................... 390
`E. ~Modiano and A. Narnia-Tam
`-
`NONBLOCKING WDM NETWORKS WITH FIXED’TUNED TRANSMITI‘ERS AND TUNABLIS
`RECEIVERS .......... .;.............................................................................................................................................................
`T. Lin and G. Sasaki
`.
`
`400
`
`ON NEW ARCI-II’I‘ECTURES FOR WDM NETWORKS ...........................,.................................................................... 402
`A. Sen, '1‘. Shah, and B.P. Sinha
`
`ALL—OPTICAL LABEL SWAPPING WITH WAVELENGTH CONVERSION FOR WDM-IP NETWORKS
`WITH SUBCARRIER MULTIPLEXED ADDRESSING .................................................................................................
`DJ. Blumenthal
`
`414
`
`vii
`
`HUGHESOO883609
`
`

`

`yr—mm
`
`.
`r
`II-E: COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND SERVICES
`Chair; S. Lin
`(University of Hawaii) .
`
`.
`
`ON DISCRETE SUFFICIENT STATISTICS FOR ACQUISITION IN ASYNCI‘IRONOUS
`............................................ u....................................................u
`BAND-LIMITED CDMA SYSTEMS ...........................
`A. Mantmvadi and V.V. Veeravalii
`
`424
`
`FREQUENCY SYNCHRONIZATION ALGORITHM FOR FREQUENCY HOPPING
`SYSTEM BASED ON SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION........................
`......................................................... 434
`A. Pouttu
`
`FOR CELLULAR AND PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
`’
`A SOFTWAREORIENTED STREAM CIPHER
`SERVICES .......................................................................................................................................................................... ..
`M. Zhang, A. Chan, and C. Carrol)
`I
`BINARY RANK CRITERIA FOR I’SK MODULA’I‘ED SPACE~TIME CODES ......................................;.................... 445
`H. BI Gama! and AR. Hammons, Jr.
`
`443
`
`TURBO CODES WITH OR’I‘HOGONAL MODULATION IN DS~CDMA MOBILE
`RADIO SYSTEM WITH SHORT FRAME TRANSMISSION...................;........................................‘.............................
`G. Li and Y.L. Guan
`-
`.
`
`451
`
`461
`
`AN INTERACTIVE CONCATENATED TURBO CODING SYSTEM ...................................................;.....................,
`H. Tang, S. Lin, and M.P.C. Fossorier
`“
`Y. Lin,
`I‘ll-DIRECTIONAL SOVA DECODING FOR TURBO-CODES ..................................................................................... 471
`and C. Xu
`J. Chen, M.P.C. Fossoricr, 8. Lin,
`
`II—F: FADING CHANNELS AND POWER CONTROL
`Chair: D. Sarwatc
`(University ofIllinois at Urbana-Champaign)
`
`ANALYSIS OF AN [JP/DOWN POWER CONTROL ALGORITHM IN CDMA REVERSE LINK
`UNDER FADING CONDITION ............................................................i............................................................................
`L. Song, N. Mandayam, and Z. GaJic
`,
`I
`A CLASS OF DISTRIBUTED ASYNCIIRONOUS POWER CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR CELLULAR
`WIRELESS SYSTEMS ........................................................................................................................................................
`J.D. Herdmer and EKJ’. Chang
`‘
`
`475
`
`485
`
`DISTRIBUTED CONNECTION ADMISSION CONTROL FOR POWERuCONTROLLED
`CBLLUIARWIRELESS SYSTEMS.............................................................................................................-.....................
`M. Xiao, NB. Shroff, and E.K.P. Chong
`.
`IVE CHANNELS: A NEW LOOK AT MULTICARRIER
`
`INTERFERENCE AVOIDANCE AND DISPERS
`MODULATION .................................................................................................................................................................. ..
`D.C. I’opcscu and C. Rose
`~
`
`495
`
`505
`
`DES ON GAUSSIAN AND RAYLEIGH FADING CHANNELS: A
`PERFORMANCE OF OPTIMAL co
`GEOMETRICALAPPRO’ACH ...........................................................................................................................................
`S. Vialle and J. Boutros
`I
`IMP’ROVED MARKOV MODELS FOR FADING CHANNELS: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ....
`.....................'......... 525
`D.L. Goeckcl, MJ. Chu, and WE. Stark
`'
`
`5.15
`
`viii
`
`HUGHE800883610
`
`

`

`‘I
`
`
`
`III—A: CODING THEORY III: ALGEBRAIC AND COMBINATORIAL CODING THEORY
`Organizers: R. Koettcr and R13. Blahut
`‘
`(University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign)
`Chair: N. Boston
`(University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
`
`ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF EXTREMAL ADDITIVE CODES OVER GF(4)v......"I................................’........
`P. Gaborit, W,C. Huffman,» J.—L. Kim, and V. Plcss
`7
`
`535
`
`TWO FAST ALGORITHMS IN THE SUDAN DECODING PROCEDURE .................................................................. 545
`G.-L. Fang
`I
`‘
`FROM WEIGHT ENUMERATORS TO ZETA FUNCTIONS ..................................
`............................................... 555
`'
`I. Duursma
`~
`ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE COMPUTATION OF ERROR VALUES FOR IIERMITIAN
`CODES ................................................................................................................................................................................ .. 557
`O’Suliivan
`
`III-l}: STOCIIAS’I‘IC NETWORKS III
`Organizers: S.P. Meyn and R. Sn‘kant
`(University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
`Chair: S.P. Mcyn
`_
`(University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign)
`
`BUFFER OVERFLOW ASYMI’TOTICS IN HOL SERVICE SYSTEMS WITH HETEROGENEOUS
`LONG-TAILED INPUTS.........-.......................................................................................................................................... ..
`C. Kotopoulos, N. Likhanov and KR. Mazumdar
`,
`
`567
`
`SCHEDULING AND CONTROL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS —— A FLUID APPROACH ...........................
`G. Weiss
`I 587
`MULTICLASS NETWORKS IN HEAVY TRAFFIC: ASYMP'I‘OTIC OPTIMALITY OF TRACKING
`POLICIES.........................
`...................................................................................................................................................
`C. Magiaras
`'
`'
`
`577
`
`597
`
`SCHEDULING OPEN QUEUEING NETWOIUCS WITH SUFFICIENTLY FLEXIBLE RESOURCES .....................
`S. Kumar
`’
`
`OPTIMALLY STABILIZING CONTROLS FOR A DETERMINISTIC NETWORK MODEL .................................... 607
`P. Dupuis and R. Atar
`/
`
`III-C: ROBUST CONTROL AND DECISION MAKING
`Chair: C. Beck
`V
`. (University of Illinois at UrbanawChampaign)
`
`EVALUATING CUMULANT CONTROLLERS ON A BENCHMARK STRUCTURE PROTECTION
`PROBLEM IN THE PRESENCE OF CLASSIC EARTHQUAKES ................................................................................‘
`K.D. Pham, MK. Sain, S.R. Liberty, and RF. Spencer, Jr.
`RISK-SENSI'I‘IVE DECISION-THEORETIC TROUBLESHOOTING ...............................................................f........... 627
`MA. Shayman and E. Feméndez~Gaucherand
`
`617
`
`ix
`
`HUGHE800883611
`
`

`

`IL CONTROL FOR MIXED DIS’I’URBANCE REJECTION .......................................................................................... 637
`LC. Luo and EB. Lee
`
`SOLVING POLYNOMIAL SYSTEMS IN ROBUST STABILITY ANALYSIS ..........................................................,. 641
`V
`N.-P. Kc
`-
`'
`
`ROBUST, NEAR TIME-OPTIMAL CONTROL OF THIRD—ORDER- UNCER’I‘AIN SYSTEMS ..............................,. 65 I
`. K.H. You and EB. Lee I
`.
`
`,
`A NEW CONVEX RELAXATION FOR ROBUST H, PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF
`'
`'
`'
`UNCERTAIN LINEAR SYSTEMS
`...............................................................................................................................
`.L. El Ghaoui and I3. Peron
`.
`V
`I
`
`655
`
`A NEW RESULT ON THE BELLMAN EQUATION FOR EXIT TIME CONTROL PROBLEMS
`WITH CRITICAL GROWTH DYNAMICS .......................................................................................................................
`M. Malisof?‘
`
`657
`
`III-I): OPTICAL NETWORKS II
`Organizers: M. Médard and E. Modiano
`(University of Illinois at Urbana-Clmmpaign and
`Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
`Chair: M. Médard
`(University of Illinois at Urbana~ClIampaign)
`FAULT PROTECTION IN WDM MESH NETWORKS................................................................................................... 659
`G. Ellinas
`
`A COMPARISON OF ALLOCATION POLICIES IN WAVELENGTH ROUTING NETWORKS.............................. 669
`Y. Zhu, G.N. Rouskas, and HG. Perms
`OPTICAL BUFFERS FOR MULTLTERABIT IP ROUTERS ..............;...................................................
`OK. Hunter, I. Andonovic. and MC, Chi'a
`.
`WAVELENGTH SCHEDULING SWITCH .............................................................u 689
`THE NSCHEDULER: A MULTI
`and DJ. Blumemhal
`LP. Lang, EA. Varvarigos,
`0N DIFFERENT ROUTING STRATEGIES IN TRANSPARENT ALL-OPTICAL NETWORKS .............................. 699
`OK. Tonguz
`
`..................... 679
`
`III-E: COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
`Chair: R. Cruz
`(University of California, San Diego)
`
`-
`TRANSMISSION POLICIES FOR TIME VARYING CHANNELS WITH AVERAGE DELAY
`‘
`'
`CONSTRAINTS ...................................................................................................................................................................
`B.E. Collins and ILL. Cruz
`.
`FAIR ALLOCATION OF UTILITIES IN MUL’I‘IRATE MULTICAST NETWORKS.................................................. 718
`S. Sarkar and L. Tassiulas '
`
`709
`
`ON THE USE OF MULTIPLE WORKING POINTS IN MULTICHANNEL ALOHA WITH DEADLINES;............. 728
`D Baron and Y. Birk
`
`HUGHESOO883612
`
`

`

`SPECIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF A RELIABLE BROADCASTING PROTOCOL
`1N MAUDE .............................................................................................................................................
`G. Denker, JJ. Garcia-Luna~Aceves, J. Mcseguer, P.C. Olveczky, J. Raju, B. Smith, and CL.
`
`733
`
`......“
`
`I
`MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF ACTIVE MESSAGES IN VOLATILE NETWORKS ...........................
`............"
`C, Okino and G. Cybenko
`‘
`IMPLEMENTATION OF'AN ACTIVE CONGESTION CONTROL SCHEME IN NARROWBAND ATM
`NETWORKS .................
`.................................................................................................................................,.'................... 758
`S. Shem, J. EvanS, A. Kulkarni, and G. Minden
`
`748
`
`CPU SCHEDULING FOR ACTIVE PROCESSING USING FEEDBACK DEFICIT ROUND ROBIN .....u;............... 768
`'1‘. Wolf and D. Decasper
`'
`.
`
`III-F: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION I: DETECTION AND ESTIMATION
`Organizers: V.V. Veeravalli and U. Madhow
`(Cornell University and UIIIVCI’SII)! ofIllinois at Urbana~Champaign)
`Chair: V.V. Vecmvalli
`(Cornell University)
`
`PRECODING EOR SCATTERING FUNCTION ESTIMATION OF MOBILE CHANNELS USING OUTPUT
`CORRELATIONS ONLY ............................................................................
`..................................................................... 770
`C, 'I’epechenlioglu and 0.13. Giannakis
`'
`‘
`
`TWO-ST