throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00210
`U.S. Patent No. 7,116,710
`_________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Apple Inc., Petitioner
`v.
`California Institute of Technology, Patent Owner
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slides
`U.S. Patent 7,116,710
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00210
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`April 19, 2018
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`1
`
`

`

`RRoadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure to Cross-Examine
`
`Response to Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`2
`
`

`

`RRoadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure to Cross-Examine
`
`Response to Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`3
`
`

`

`TThe Claims Are Invalid
`• Claims 1 and 3 are anticipated by Frey
`• Claims 1–8 and 11–14 are obvious over Divsalar and Frey
`• Claims 15–17, 19–22, and 24–33 are Divsalar, Frey,
`and Luby97
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`4
`
`

`

`’’710 Patent Claims a Conventional Coder
`CCombined With a Known Irregularity Technique
`
`’710 Patent Fig. 2
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1001 [’710 patent] at Fig. 2
`
`Pet. at 22; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 97-98
`5
`
`

`

`DDivsalar Discloses Every Aspect Except Irregularity
`Divsalar Fig. 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 1003 [Divsalar] at Fig. 3 Ex. 1003 [Divsalar] at Fig. Ex 1003 [Divsalar] at Fig 3
`
`’710 Patent Fig. 2
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`
`
`Ex. 1001 [’710 patent] at Fig. 2 E 1001 [’710 patent] at Fig 2E 1001 [’710 ] Fi
`
`
`Pet. at 22, 29; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 77-78, 97-98, 140-146
`6
`
`

`

`FFrey Teaches Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at Title, Abstract
`
`Pet. at 25-28, 43; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 63-70, 128
`7
`
`

`

`FFrey Teaches Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at Figs. 1, 2E 1002 [F ] Fi 1 2
`
`
`
`Pet. at 25-28, 46, 58; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 63-70, 133, 174-175
`8
`
`

`

`FFrey Provides Motivations to Combine Irregularity
`
`
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at 2, 6 Ex 1002 [Frey] at 2 6
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 25-28, 42-43, 48; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 69, 128-130
`9
`
`

`

`TThe Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 44-45
`10
`
`
`
`Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 131E 1006 [D i D l ] ¶ 131
`
`
`
`

`

`TThe Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Reply at 9
`
`Pet. at 44-45; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 131
`11
`
`

`

`TThe Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`Pet. at 46, 58; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at 133, 174-175; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 44; Ex. 1062 [Mitzenmacher Deposition] at 417:16-418:5
`IPR2017-00210
`12
`
`Reply at 9-10
`
`

`

`FFrey Divsalar and Luby97 Render Claims
`115-17, 19-22, and 24-33 Obvious
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 31-32, 61-64; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 91, 185-187, 194-197; Reply at 13-14; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 62
`13
`
`
`
`Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 185-186l
`
`

`

`RRoadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure to Cross-Examine
`
`Response to Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`14
`
`

`

`PPO’s Failure to Cross-Examine
`• PO chose to not depose Petitioner’s experts
`–Dr. Frey (Reply Declarant)
`–Dr. Davis (2nd Declaration)
`
`• PO also chose to not depose Petitioner’s other declarants
`–Stansbury
`–Hajek
`–Basar
`–Sreenivas
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`15
`
`

`

`RRoadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure to Cross-Examine
`
`Response to Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`16
`
`

`

`RResponse to Surreplies
`
`CalTech Surreply Issue
`
`Issue Addressed in Briefing
`
`Frey is prior art
`
`Petition at 25; Reply at 17
`
`Frey’s 2nd coder has rate 2/3
`
`Petition at 39-42; Reply at 5-6
`
`Frey teaches partitioning
`
`Petition at 36-37; Reply at 1-4
`
`Frey discloses repetition of information bits
`
`Petition at 9, 25-28, 46, 58; Reply at 1-4
`
`Dr. Frey’s experimental data is proper
`
`Petition at 42-48; Reply at 9-11
`
`The Tanner graphs are supported by the petitions
`
`Petition at 19, 28-31, 8; Reply at 9-11
`
`Testimony of Dr. Davis and Dr. Frey is proper
`
`Reply at 2; Ex. 1073 [Davis Decl.]
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`17
`
`

`

`FFrey Is Prior Art
`
`Ex. 1001 [’710 patent] at 1
`
`Ex. 1015 [Conference Proceedings
`Table of Contents] at 16
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1031 [Stansbury Decl.] at ¶ 4
`Pet. at 25; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 63
`18
`
`

`

`FFrey is Prior Art
`
`Source
`Code File
`
`Caltech’s
`Proposed Date
`
`IRA.cpp
`
`March 10, 2000
`
`IRA.h
`
`March 10, 2000
`
`Last
`Change Made
`Confidential
`Reply at 20; Ex-1050
`Confidential
`Reply at 20; Ex-1051
`Confidential
`Reply at 20; Ex-1052
`Confidential
`Reply at 20; Ex-1053
`Exs. 1050 [IRA.cpp], 1051 [IRA.h], 1052 [IRAsimu.cpp], 1054 [GetInter.cpp];
`Reply at 17-21
`
`IRAsimu.cpp March 20, 2000
`
`GetInter.cpp
`
`March 12, 2000
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`
`
`Reply at 20-21Reply at 20 21
`
`19
`
`

`

`DDr. Frey's Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey’s Convolutional Coder Shows a Rate of 2/3
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶ 31-32
`Pet. at 39-40; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 174-176, 120-122; Reply at 5-6
`20
`
`

`

`DDr. Frey's Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey’s Convolutional Coder Shows a Rate of 2/3
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 39-40; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 174-176, 120-122; Reply at 5-6; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶ 31-32
`21
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at 3, 2, 5
`
`

`

`DDr. Frey’s Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey Teaches Partitioning
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 36; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 112-113
`22
`
`
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶ 26-27 E 1065 [F D l ] t ¶¶ 26 27
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`DDr. Frey’s Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey Teaches Partitioning
`
`Pet. at 36; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 112-113; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 27; Ex. 1062 [Mitzenmacher Transcript] at 381:3-382:13
`IPR2017-00210
`23
`
`
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at 4, 2 Ex 1002 [Frey] at 4 2
`
`

`

`DDr. Frey’s Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey Teaches Repetition of Information Bits
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 22 E 1065 [Fre Decl ] at ¶ 22
`
`Pet. at 9, 25-28, 46, 58; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 174-176, 120-122
`24
`
`

`

`DDr. Frey’s Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey Teaches Repetition of Information Bits
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 9, 25-28, 46, 58; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 174-176, 120-122; Ex. 1002 [Frey] at Fig. 2
`25
`
`
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at 3 Ex 1002 [Frey] at 3
`
`

`

`EExperimental Data Is Proper
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 131-132
`Pet. at 42-48
`26
`
`

`

`EExperimental Data Is Proper
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 42-48
`27
`
`
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶ 42, 45 E 1065 [F D l ] t ¶¶ 42 45
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EExperimental Data Is Proper
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1068 [Divsalar Simulation] at 5
`Pet. at 42-48; Reply at 10-11; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶ 45-57
`28
`
`

`

`TTanner Graphs Are Supported by Petitions
`
`Ex. 1046
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`210 Pet. at 45
`Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶132
`29
`
`

`

`TTanner Graphs Are Supported by Petitions
`
`Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 57
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 61
`Pet at 18-19; Reply at 9-10
`30
`
`

`

`TTanner Graphs Are Supported by Petitions
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 44Ex 1065 [Frey Decl ] at ¶ 44
`
`Pet at 18-19; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 57; Reply at 9-10
`31
`
`

`

`TTestimony of Dr. Davis and Dr. Frey Is Proper
`
`Ex. 1073 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 2
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 16
`Reply at 2
`32
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00210
`
`Dated: April 16, 2018
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Michael Smith/
`
`
`
`Richard A. Goldenberg (No. 38,895)
`Dominic A. Massa (No. 44,905)
`Michael H. Smith (No. 71,190)
`Mark D. Selwyn (pro hac vice)
`James M. Dowd (pro hac vice)
`Kelvin Chan (No. 71,433)
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00210
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on April 16, 2018, a true and correct copy of the
`
`following:
`
` Petitioner’s Demonstratives for Oral Argument
`was served via electronic mail upon the following attorneys of record:
`
`Michael Rosato (mrosato@wsgr.com)
`Matthew Argenti (margenti@wsgr.com)
`Richard Torczon (rtorczon@wsgr.com)
`Kevin P.B. Johnson (kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com)
`Todd M. Briggs (toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com)
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`Kelvin W. Chan (Reg. No. 71,433)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket