`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00210
`U.S. Patent No. 7,116,710
`_________________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple Inc., Petitioner
`v.
`California Institute of Technology, Patent Owner
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Slides
`U.S. Patent 7,116,710
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00210
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`April 19, 2018
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`1
`
`
`
`RRoadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure to Cross-Examine
`
`Response to Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`2
`
`
`
`RRoadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure to Cross-Examine
`
`Response to Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`3
`
`
`
`TThe Claims Are Invalid
`• Claims 1 and 3 are anticipated by Frey
`• Claims 1–8 and 11–14 are obvious over Divsalar and Frey
`• Claims 15–17, 19–22, and 24–33 are Divsalar, Frey,
`and Luby97
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`4
`
`
`
`’’710 Patent Claims a Conventional Coder
`CCombined With a Known Irregularity Technique
`
`’710 Patent Fig. 2
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1001 [’710 patent] at Fig. 2
`
`Pet. at 22; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 97-98
`5
`
`
`
`DDivsalar Discloses Every Aspect Except Irregularity
`Divsalar Fig. 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 1003 [Divsalar] at Fig. 3 Ex. 1003 [Divsalar] at Fig. Ex 1003 [Divsalar] at Fig 3
`
`’710 Patent Fig. 2
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`
`
`Ex. 1001 [’710 patent] at Fig. 2 E 1001 [’710 patent] at Fig 2E 1001 [’710 ] Fi
`
`
`Pet. at 22, 29; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 77-78, 97-98, 140-146
`6
`
`
`
`FFrey Teaches Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at Title, Abstract
`
`Pet. at 25-28, 43; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 63-70, 128
`7
`
`
`
`FFrey Teaches Irregularity
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at Figs. 1, 2E 1002 [F ] Fi 1 2
`
`
`
`Pet. at 25-28, 46, 58; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 63-70, 133, 174-175
`8
`
`
`
`FFrey Provides Motivations to Combine Irregularity
`
`
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at 2, 6 Ex 1002 [Frey] at 2 6
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 25-28, 42-43, 48; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 69, 128-130
`9
`
`
`
`TThe Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 44-45
`10
`
`
`
`Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 131E 1006 [D i D l ] ¶ 131
`
`
`
`
`
`TThe Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Reply at 9
`
`Pet. at 44-45; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 131
`11
`
`
`
`TThe Modification Would Have Been Simple
`
`Pet. at 46, 58; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at 133, 174-175; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 44; Ex. 1062 [Mitzenmacher Deposition] at 417:16-418:5
`IPR2017-00210
`12
`
`Reply at 9-10
`
`
`
`FFrey Divsalar and Luby97 Render Claims
`115-17, 19-22, and 24-33 Obvious
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 31-32, 61-64; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 91, 185-187, 194-197; Reply at 13-14; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 62
`13
`
`
`
`Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 185-186l
`
`
`
`RRoadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure to Cross-Examine
`
`Response to Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`14
`
`
`
`PPO’s Failure to Cross-Examine
`• PO chose to not depose Petitioner’s experts
`–Dr. Frey (Reply Declarant)
`–Dr. Davis (2nd Declaration)
`
`• PO also chose to not depose Petitioner’s other declarants
`–Stansbury
`–Hajek
`–Basar
`–Sreenivas
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`15
`
`
`
`RRoadmap
`
`The Claims Are Invalid
`
`PO’s Failure to Cross-Examine
`
`Response to Surreplies
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`16
`
`
`
`RResponse to Surreplies
`
`CalTech Surreply Issue
`
`Issue Addressed in Briefing
`
`Frey is prior art
`
`Petition at 25; Reply at 17
`
`Frey’s 2nd coder has rate 2/3
`
`Petition at 39-42; Reply at 5-6
`
`Frey teaches partitioning
`
`Petition at 36-37; Reply at 1-4
`
`Frey discloses repetition of information bits
`
`Petition at 9, 25-28, 46, 58; Reply at 1-4
`
`Dr. Frey’s experimental data is proper
`
`Petition at 42-48; Reply at 9-11
`
`The Tanner graphs are supported by the petitions
`
`Petition at 19, 28-31, 8; Reply at 9-11
`
`Testimony of Dr. Davis and Dr. Frey is proper
`
`Reply at 2; Ex. 1073 [Davis Decl.]
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`17
`
`
`
`FFrey Is Prior Art
`
`Ex. 1001 [’710 patent] at 1
`
`Ex. 1015 [Conference Proceedings
`Table of Contents] at 16
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1031 [Stansbury Decl.] at ¶ 4
`Pet. at 25; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 63
`18
`
`
`
`FFrey is Prior Art
`
`Source
`Code File
`
`Caltech’s
`Proposed Date
`
`IRA.cpp
`
`March 10, 2000
`
`IRA.h
`
`March 10, 2000
`
`Last
`Change Made
`Confidential
`Reply at 20; Ex-1050
`Confidential
`Reply at 20; Ex-1051
`Confidential
`Reply at 20; Ex-1052
`Confidential
`Reply at 20; Ex-1053
`Exs. 1050 [IRA.cpp], 1051 [IRA.h], 1052 [IRAsimu.cpp], 1054 [GetInter.cpp];
`Reply at 17-21
`
`IRAsimu.cpp March 20, 2000
`
`GetInter.cpp
`
`March 12, 2000
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`
`
`Reply at 20-21Reply at 20 21
`
`19
`
`
`
`DDr. Frey's Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey’s Convolutional Coder Shows a Rate of 2/3
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶ 31-32
`Pet. at 39-40; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 174-176, 120-122; Reply at 5-6
`20
`
`
`
`DDr. Frey's Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey’s Convolutional Coder Shows a Rate of 2/3
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 39-40; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 174-176, 120-122; Reply at 5-6; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶ 31-32
`21
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at 3, 2, 5
`
`
`
`DDr. Frey’s Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey Teaches Partitioning
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 36; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 112-113
`22
`
`
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶ 26-27 E 1065 [F D l ] t ¶¶ 26 27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DDr. Frey’s Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey Teaches Partitioning
`
`Pet. at 36; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 112-113; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 27; Ex. 1062 [Mitzenmacher Transcript] at 381:3-382:13
`IPR2017-00210
`23
`
`
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at 4, 2 Ex 1002 [Frey] at 4 2
`
`
`
`DDr. Frey’s Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey Teaches Repetition of Information Bits
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 22 E 1065 [Fre Decl ] at ¶ 22
`
`Pet. at 9, 25-28, 46, 58; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 174-176, 120-122
`24
`
`
`
`DDr. Frey’s Unchallenged Declaration:
`FFrey Teaches Repetition of Information Bits
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 9, 25-28, 46, 58; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 174-176, 120-122; Ex. 1002 [Frey] at Fig. 2
`25
`
`
`
`Ex. 1002 [Frey] at 3 Ex 1002 [Frey] at 3
`
`
`
`EExperimental Data Is Proper
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶¶ 131-132
`Pet. at 42-48
`26
`
`
`
`EExperimental Data Is Proper
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Pet. at 42-48
`27
`
`
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶ 42, 45 E 1065 [F D l ] t ¶¶ 42 45
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EExperimental Data Is Proper
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1068 [Divsalar Simulation] at 5
`Pet. at 42-48; Reply at 10-11; Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶¶ 45-57
`28
`
`
`
`TTanner Graphs Are Supported by Petitions
`
`Ex. 1046
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`210 Pet. at 45
`Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶132
`29
`
`
`
`TTanner Graphs Are Supported by Petitions
`
`Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 57
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 61
`Pet at 18-19; Reply at 9-10
`30
`
`
`
`TTanner Graphs Are Supported by Petitions
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 44Ex 1065 [Frey Decl ] at ¶ 44
`
`Pet at 18-19; Ex. 1006 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 57; Reply at 9-10
`31
`
`
`
`TTestimony of Dr. Davis and Dr. Frey Is Proper
`
`Ex. 1073 [Davis Decl.] at ¶ 2
`
`IPR2017-00210
`
`Ex. 1065 [Frey Decl.] at ¶ 16
`Reply at 2
`32
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00210
`
`Dated: April 16, 2018
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Michael Smith/
`
`
`
`Richard A. Goldenberg (No. 38,895)
`Dominic A. Massa (No. 44,905)
`Michael H. Smith (No. 71,190)
`Mark D. Selwyn (pro hac vice)
`James M. Dowd (pro hac vice)
`Kelvin Chan (No. 71,433)
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2017-00210
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on April 16, 2018, a true and correct copy of the
`
`following:
`
` Petitioner’s Demonstratives for Oral Argument
`was served via electronic mail upon the following attorneys of record:
`
`Michael Rosato (mrosato@wsgr.com)
`Matthew Argenti (margenti@wsgr.com)
`Richard Torczon (rtorczon@wsgr.com)
`Kevin P.B. Johnson (kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com)
`Todd M. Briggs (toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com)
`
`
`/Kelvin Chan/
`
`Kelvin W. Chan (Reg. No. 71,433)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`