`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. ___
`Filed: August 17, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________________
`
`
`MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MONOSOL RX, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`_____________________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00200
`Patent 8,603,514 B2
`_____________________________
`
`PETITIONER MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S MOTION FOR PRO
`HAC VICE ADMISSION UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Petitioner Mylan Technologies, Inc.
`
`(“Petitioner”) respectfully requests that the Board recognize Tung-On Kong and
`
`Elham F. Steiner as counsel pro hac vice in this proceeding. Petitioner seeks the
`
`counsel of Tung-On Kong and Elham F. Steiner due to their experience in life
`
`sciences-related patent matters and particularly due to their familiarity with the
`
`substantive and technical issues involved in this proceeding. This Motion is
`
`authorized by the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing
`
`Patent Owner Preliminary Response (Paper No. 3).
`
`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner are patent litigation attorneys with experience
`
`representing clients in multiple jurisdictions, including United States District
`
`Courts and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner have
`
`experience in all stages of litigation, from preliminary injunction through trial and
`
`appeal, and across a wide range of technologies, including pharmaceutical drugs,
`
`formulations, and dosages. Petitioner provides Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner’s
`
`respective pertinent biographical background appended hereto in further support of
`
`this Motion.
`
`Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner also have particular experience and familiarity
`
`with the substantive and technical issues involved in this inter partes review
`
`proceeding. In a related matter involving the U.S. Patent No. 8,603,514, Mr. Kong
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`and Ms. Steiner represent Petitioner in consolidated litigation currently pending in
`
`the District of Delaware. See Indivior, Inc. et al. v. Mylan Technologies Inc. et al.,
`
`No. 15-cv-1016-RGA. In addition, Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner have been involved
`
`in numerous patent cases in United States District Courts involving pharmaceutical
`
`patents.
`
`Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner have also performed a detailed review of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,603,514, the parties’ submissions in the present Inter Partes Review
`
`proceeding, and the Board’s Decision instituting Inter Partes Reviw of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,603,514. Additionally, Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner have served essential roles
`
`in this Inter Partes Review proceeding, including working with the present Lead
`
`Counsel to prepare Petitioner’s Petition. Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner thus have a
`
`detailed understanding of U.S. Patent No. 8,603,514 and the substantive and
`
`technical issues involved in this proceeding.
`
`Through Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner’s representation in these and related
`
`matters, Petitioner has developed a particular relationship with Mr. Kong and Ms.
`
`Steiner, which Petitioner desires to continue with Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner for the
`
`purpose of this IPR proceeding. Accordingly, Petitioner respectfully requests that
`
`the Board grant this Motion.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`II. DECLARATIONS OF INDIVIDUALS SEEKING TO APPEAR
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by a Declaration
`
`of Tung-On Kong (Ex. 1028) and Declaration of Elham F. Steiner (Ex. 1029). In
`
`their declarations, Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner attest to each of the listed items
`
`required by the Order Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission in Unified
`
`Patents Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7.
`
`III.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Tung-On Kong and Elham F. Steiner as counsel Pro Hac Vice in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: August 17, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Steven W. Parmelee /
` Steven W. Parmelee
` Reg. No. 31,990
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit No
`
`List of Exhibits
`
`Description
`
`
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,603,514 to Yang et al.
`
`Declaration of Graham Buckton, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Graham Buckton, Ph.D.
`
`File history of U.S. Patent No. 8,603,514.
`
`Ilango et al., In-Vitro studies on Buccal strips of Glibenclamide
`using Chitosan, 59 Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 232-235 (1997).
`
`WO2000/42992 to Chen et al.
`
`Declaration of B. Arlie Bogue, Dated: March 13, 2013;
`Reexamination Control No. 95/002,170.
`
`Frankman et al., Clinical evaluation of C-Film, a vaginal
`contraceptive, 3 J. Int. Med. Res. 292-96 (1975).
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,595,980 to Brode et al.
`
`Roddy et al., A controlled trial of nonoxynol 9 film to reduce
`male-to-female transmission of sexually transmitted
`diseases, 339 N. Engl. J. Med. 504-10 (1998).
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,569,837 to Suzuki et al.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Exhibit No
`
`Description
`
`
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,159,498 to Tapolsky et al.
`
`Yamamura et al., Oral mucosal adhesive film containing local
`anesthetics: in vitro and clinical evaluation. 43 J. Biomed.
`Mater. Res. 313-317 (1998).
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,713,243 to Schiraldi et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,568,535 to Loesche et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 3,797,494 to Zaffaroni et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,249,531 to Heller et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,506,049 to Swei et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,067,116 to Bess et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,849,246 to Schmidt et al.
`
`European Patent No. 0241178 to Higashi et al.
`
`The United States Pharmacopeia: 20th Revision and the National
`Formulary, Fifteenth Edition. Rockville, Md: United States
`Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., 1979.
`Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Watson Laboratories,
`Inc. and Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Par
`Pharmaceutical, Inc., C.A. No. 13-1674 and C.A. No. 14-
`422, District of Delaware, D.I. 446.
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit No
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`Description
`Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Watson Laboratories,
`Inc. and Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Par
`Pharmaceutical, Inc., C.A. No. 13-1674 and C.A. No. 14-
`422, District of Delaware, D.I. 156.
`Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Teva Pharmaceuticals
`USA, Inc. and Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Par
`Pharmaceutical, Inc., C.A. No. 14-1451 and C.A. No. 14-
`1573, District of Delaware, D.I. 175.
`
`Complaint; Indivior Inc. et al v. Mylan Technologies, Inc. et al.,
`No. 1:15-CV-00209, Northern District of West Virginia.
`
`Complaint; Indivior Inc. et al v. Mylan Technologies, Inc. et al.,
`No. 1:15-cv-01016, District of Delaware.
`
`Declaration of Tung-On Kong in support of Petitioner’s Motion
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`Declaration of Elham F. Steiner in support of Petitioner’s Motion
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`This is to certify that I caused to be served true and correct copies of the
`
`foregoing Petitioner Mylan Technologies Inc.’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and corresponding Exhibits 1028 and 1029,
`
`on this 17th day of August, 2017, on the Patent Owner at the correspondence
`
`address of the Patent Owner as follows:
`
`Harold Fox
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20036-1795
`Email: hfox@steptoe.com
`Email: 514MIPR@steptoe.com
`
`
`John L. Abramic
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`115 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3100
`Chicago, IL 60603
`Email: jabramic@steptoe.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Charanjit Brahma
`TROUTMAN SANDERS
`580 California Street, Suite 1100
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Email:
`charanjit.brahma@troutmansanders.com
`
`Dustin B. Weeks
`TROUTMAN SANDERS
`600 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 5200
`Atlanta, GA 30308
`Email:
`dustin.weeks@troutmansanders.com
`
`Dated: August 17, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Steven W. Parmelee /
` Steven W. Parmelee, Lead Counsel
` Reg. No. 31,990
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`