throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. ___
`Filed: August 17, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________________
`
`
`MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MONOSOL RX, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`_____________________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00200
`Patent 8,603,514 B2
`_____________________________
`
`PETITIONER MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S MOTION FOR PRO
`HAC VICE ADMISSION UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Petitioner Mylan Technologies, Inc.
`
`(“Petitioner”) respectfully requests that the Board recognize Tung-On Kong and
`
`Elham F. Steiner as counsel pro hac vice in this proceeding. Petitioner seeks the
`
`counsel of Tung-On Kong and Elham F. Steiner due to their experience in life
`
`sciences-related patent matters and particularly due to their familiarity with the
`
`substantive and technical issues involved in this proceeding. This Motion is
`
`authorized by the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing
`
`Patent Owner Preliminary Response (Paper No. 3).
`
`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner are patent litigation attorneys with experience
`
`representing clients in multiple jurisdictions, including United States District
`
`Courts and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner have
`
`experience in all stages of litigation, from preliminary injunction through trial and
`
`appeal, and across a wide range of technologies, including pharmaceutical drugs,
`
`formulations, and dosages. Petitioner provides Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner’s
`
`respective pertinent biographical background appended hereto in further support of
`
`this Motion.
`
`Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner also have particular experience and familiarity
`
`with the substantive and technical issues involved in this inter partes review
`
`proceeding. In a related matter involving the U.S. Patent No. 8,603,514, Mr. Kong
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`and Ms. Steiner represent Petitioner in consolidated litigation currently pending in
`
`the District of Delaware. See Indivior, Inc. et al. v. Mylan Technologies Inc. et al.,
`
`No. 15-cv-1016-RGA. In addition, Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner have been involved
`
`in numerous patent cases in United States District Courts involving pharmaceutical
`
`patents.
`
`Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner have also performed a detailed review of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,603,514, the parties’ submissions in the present Inter Partes Review
`
`proceeding, and the Board’s Decision instituting Inter Partes Reviw of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,603,514. Additionally, Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner have served essential roles
`
`in this Inter Partes Review proceeding, including working with the present Lead
`
`Counsel to prepare Petitioner’s Petition. Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner thus have a
`
`detailed understanding of U.S. Patent No. 8,603,514 and the substantive and
`
`technical issues involved in this proceeding.
`
`Through Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner’s representation in these and related
`
`matters, Petitioner has developed a particular relationship with Mr. Kong and Ms.
`
`Steiner, which Petitioner desires to continue with Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner for the
`
`purpose of this IPR proceeding. Accordingly, Petitioner respectfully requests that
`
`the Board grant this Motion.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`II. DECLARATIONS OF INDIVIDUALS SEEKING TO APPEAR
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by a Declaration
`
`of Tung-On Kong (Ex. 1028) and Declaration of Elham F. Steiner (Ex. 1029). In
`
`their declarations, Mr. Kong and Ms. Steiner attest to each of the listed items
`
`required by the Order Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission in Unified
`
`Patents Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7.
`
`III.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Tung-On Kong and Elham F. Steiner as counsel Pro Hac Vice in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: August 17, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Steven W. Parmelee /
` Steven W. Parmelee
` Reg. No. 31,990
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`Exhibit No
`
`List of Exhibits
`
`Description
`
`
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,603,514 to Yang et al.
`
`Declaration of Graham Buckton, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Graham Buckton, Ph.D.
`
`File history of U.S. Patent No. 8,603,514.
`
`Ilango et al., In-Vitro studies on Buccal strips of Glibenclamide
`using Chitosan, 59 Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 232-235 (1997).
`
`WO2000/42992 to Chen et al.
`
`Declaration of B. Arlie Bogue, Dated: March 13, 2013;
`Reexamination Control No. 95/002,170.
`
`Frankman et al., Clinical evaluation of C-Film, a vaginal
`contraceptive, 3 J. Int. Med. Res. 292-96 (1975).
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,595,980 to Brode et al.
`
`Roddy et al., A controlled trial of nonoxynol 9 film to reduce
`male-to-female transmission of sexually transmitted
`diseases, 339 N. Engl. J. Med. 504-10 (1998).
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,569,837 to Suzuki et al.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Exhibit No
`
`Description
`
`
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,159,498 to Tapolsky et al.
`
`Yamamura et al., Oral mucosal adhesive film containing local
`anesthetics: in vitro and clinical evaluation. 43 J. Biomed.
`Mater. Res. 313-317 (1998).
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,713,243 to Schiraldi et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,568,535 to Loesche et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 3,797,494 to Zaffaroni et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,249,531 to Heller et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,506,049 to Swei et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,067,116 to Bess et al.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,849,246 to Schmidt et al.
`
`European Patent No. 0241178 to Higashi et al.
`
`The United States Pharmacopeia: 20th Revision and the National
`Formulary, Fifteenth Edition. Rockville, Md: United States
`Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., 1979.
`Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Watson Laboratories,
`Inc. and Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Par
`Pharmaceutical, Inc., C.A. No. 13-1674 and C.A. No. 14-
`422, District of Delaware, D.I. 446.
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`Exhibit No
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`Description
`Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Watson Laboratories,
`Inc. and Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Par
`Pharmaceutical, Inc., C.A. No. 13-1674 and C.A. No. 14-
`422, District of Delaware, D.I. 156.
`Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Teva Pharmaceuticals
`USA, Inc. and Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Par
`Pharmaceutical, Inc., C.A. No. 14-1451 and C.A. No. 14-
`1573, District of Delaware, D.I. 175.
`
`Complaint; Indivior Inc. et al v. Mylan Technologies, Inc. et al.,
`No. 1:15-CV-00209, Northern District of West Virginia.
`
`Complaint; Indivior Inc. et al v. Mylan Technologies, Inc. et al.,
`No. 1:15-cv-01016, District of Delaware.
`
`Declaration of Tung-On Kong in support of Petitioner’s Motion
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`Declaration of Elham F. Steiner in support of Petitioner’s Motion
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`This is to certify that I caused to be served true and correct copies of the
`
`foregoing Petitioner Mylan Technologies Inc.’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and corresponding Exhibits 1028 and 1029,
`
`on this 17th day of August, 2017, on the Patent Owner at the correspondence
`
`address of the Patent Owner as follows:
`
`Harold Fox
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20036-1795
`Email: hfox@steptoe.com
`Email: 514MIPR@steptoe.com
`
`
`John L. Abramic
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`115 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3100
`Chicago, IL 60603
`Email: jabramic@steptoe.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Charanjit Brahma
`TROUTMAN SANDERS
`580 California Street, Suite 1100
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Email:
`charanjit.brahma@troutmansanders.com
`
`Dustin B. Weeks
`TROUTMAN SANDERS
`600 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 5200
`Atlanta, GA 30308
`Email:
`dustin.weeks@troutmansanders.com
`
`Dated: August 17, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Steven W. Parmelee /
` Steven W. Parmelee, Lead Counsel
` Reg. No. 31,990
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket