throbber
J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1983, 35:28-33
`Received June 18, 1982
`
`0022-3573183t’010028-06 $02.50/0
`© 1983 J. Pharm. Pharmacol.
`
`Physicochemical characterization of the human nail:
`permeation pattern for water and the homologous
`alcohols and differences with respect to the stratum
`corneum*
`
`KENNETH A. WALTERSt, GORDON L. FLYNN* AND JOHN R. MARVEL~
`
`College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A., and 2 Dermatological Division, Ortho
`Pharmaceutical Corporation, Raritan, New Jersey U.S.A.
`
`In order to develop a basic concept of the permeability of the human nail plate and thus
`create a better understanding of the toxic potentials and therapeutic possibilities of
`substances applied to the nail, avulsed cadaver nails have been placed in specially
`constructed diffusion chambers and their permeation by water and the n-alkanols through
`dodecanol, all in high aqueous dilution, has been investigated. The permeability coefficient
`of water is 16.5 × 103 cm h-l and that for methanol is 5.6 x 103cmh i. Ethanol’s
`permeability coefficient measured 5.8 × 10-3 cm h 1. Permeability coefficients decreased
`systematically thereafter to a low value of 0.27 x 10-3 em h-1 at n-octanol. The middle
`chain length alkanols, n-pentanol through n-octanol, have similar permeability coefficients
`but n-decanol and n-dodecanol show higher rates of permeation. The data suggest that, as a
`membrane, tile hydrated human nail plate behaves like a hydrogel of high ionic strength to
`the polar and semipolar alcohols. Declining permeability rates appear linked to decreased
`partitioning into the complex matrix of the plate as the compounds become hydrophobic.
`The results for n-decanol and n-dodecanol introduce the possibility that a parallel lipid
`pathway exists which favours the permeation of these exceedingly hydrophobic species.
`
`Apparently, no cvidcnce exists concerning funda-
`mental permeation mechanisms and possible influ-
`ences of chemical structure on transport across the
`nail plate. To an extent its permeability properties
`have been inferred without foundation from the
`behaviour of other horny tissues. In order to make a
`priori judgements concerning toxic risk and thera-
`peutic benefit of substances brought in contact with
`the nail, some baseline information on this tissue is
`nccded.
`We have shown it possible to determine nail plate
`permeability coefficients using standard diffusion
`cell techniques (Walters et a11981). Results obtained
`for water agreed well with literature data on water
`transpiration through the nail plate (Burch & Winsor
`1946; Spruit 1971; Baden et al 1973). In pursuant
`studies the techniques have been extended to the
`permeation of some n-alkanols. These are useful
`prototype compounds with systematically varying
`oi[/water (o!w) distribution coefficients and diffusion
`
`* Correspondence. This work supported through the
`generosity of Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, Raritan,
`N.J., U.S.A.
`
`+ Present address, Fisons Limited. Pharmaceutical Divi-
`sion. Research & Development Laboratories, Bakewell
`Road, Loughborough. Leicestershire LEII 0QY. U.K.
`
`coefficients. Such structural influences on physico-
`chemical properties, when considered together with
`relative permeabilities, have helped decipher the
`barrier mechanisms of several membranes (Blank
`1964; Scheuplein 1965; Hwang et al 1976; Ho et al
`1977: Behl et al 1980; Durrheim et al 1980; Flynn et
`al 1981). Previous studies of the alkanol’s permea-
`tion of skin are especially notable as these provide
`evidence that the stratum corneum acts to some
`extent as a hydrophobic continuum (barrier) (Blank
`1964; Scheuplein 1965: Behl et al 1980; Durrheim et
`al 1980; Flynn et al 1981). Similar studies on the
`human nail plate presented here are comparably
`revealing as, unlike the stratum corneum, the nail
`becomes less permeable to the n-alkanols as their
`hydrophobicity is increased. At extreme hydro-
`phobicity there is increased permeability. The
`mechanistic significance of these general observa-
`tions is considered.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`Tritiated water and radiolabelled alcohols were
`obtained from New England Nuclear ([311]water,
`[3H]methanol, [14Clethanol, [14C]butanol), Cali-
`fornia Bionuclear ([14Clpropanol. [laC]pentanol,
`
`ACRUX DDS PTY LTD. et al.
`EXHIBIT 1040
`IPR Petition for
`U.S. Patent No. 7,214,506
`
`1 of 6
`
`

`
`NAIL PERMEATION BY’ HOMOLOGOUS ALCOHOI.S
`
`29
`
`[laC]heptanol, [laC]dodecanol) and ICN ([14C]hex- compound, tl is the nail plate thickness and q. is the
`anol, [14C]octanol, [LaC]decanol). All radiolabelled
`diffusional lag time obtained by linear regression of
`compounds were diluted with saline (0.9% NaC1
`the steady state slope of uptake versus time plots.
`Irrigation Solution, Abbott Labs) before use. The The nail plates used in these studies were measured
`alkanols were diluted to trace concentrations. 1@a with a micrometer and averaged 0.54 mm in thick-
`molar or less.
`ness.
`
`Permeation procedures
`Details of the diffusion cell and permeation pro-
`cedures have been given previously (Waiters et al
`19811. Briefly, trimmed human nail plate sections*
`were placed between two halves of a diffusion cell. A
`known amount of a radiolabelled permeant was
`placed in the donor chamber and samples were taken
`at predetermined intervals from the receptor cham-
`ber. Isotope activity was monitored using a Beckman
`LS 9000 liquid scintillation counter.
`The permeation behaviours of [3H]water and
`[3H]methanol and [14C]alkanols in dilute solution
`were followed as a function of time at 37 °C. In all
`cases two permeants were applied with different
`radiolabels. Generally methanol was run as a tri-
`tiated compound along with a ~4Cqabelled co-
`permeant. Methanol thus served as a reference and it
`is important to note that the increased values for the
`permeability coefficient of decanol and dodecanol
`were obtained concurrently with normal methanol
`data.
`Permeability coefficients (P) were calculated
`from:
`
`p V(dC/dt)
`A. ~ C
`
`(i)
`
`where V is the volume of the receiver half ceil, dC/dt
`is the rate of change in concentration in the
`pseudo-steady state portion of the receiver concen-
`tration versus time plot, A is the diffusional area and
`AC is the concentration differential of permeant
`across the membrane. V(dC/dt) gives the diffusional
`flux in mass per unit time. The diffusion cells with
`nail plate membranes in place were scrupulously
`checked for intercompartmental leakage using sol-
`uble but impenetrable polyethyleneglycol markers
`and no leaks were evident.
`Diffusivities of the permeants in the nail plate
`tissue were calculated from the non-stationary state
`periods using:
`
`h2
`Deft = ~I,
`
`(2)
`
`Where D~ff is the effective diffusivity for a given
`
`* Fresh cadaver nails generously supplied by Dr T. M.
`Oelrich, University of Michigan, School of Medicine.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`Permeability coefficients of water and the saline
`diluted n-alkanols are given along with diffusion lag
`times in Table 1. Fig. 1 shows the relationship
`between the logarithms of the permeability coeffi-
`cients and the alkyl chain lengths of the alcohols. An
`unusual pattern is observed with minimum per-
`meability coefficient values at intermediate alkyl
`chain length.
`
`Table 1. Nail plate permeability data for water and
`n-alkanols.
`
`Permcability~
`Lag. time
`coefficient
`(h)
`Permeant
`(cm h 1 x 10~)
`(s)
`Water
`16.5
`_+ 5.9 (6)
`900 + 100
`Methanol
`5.6
`_+ 1.2 (26) 1790 _+ 200
`Ethanol
`5.8 + 3.1 (8)
`27311 + 200
`n-Propanol
`0.83 + 0.15(4)
`4020 + 350
`n-Butanol
`0.61 + 0.27 (4)
`3470 + 350
`n-Pentanol
`0.35 + 0.07 (6)
`27110 _+ 250
`n-Hcxanol
`0.36 _+ 0.23 (51
`3540 = 3(1(I
`n-Heptanol
`0-42 _+ 0.12 {41
`2520 _+ 300
`n-Octanol
`0-27 + 0-03 (4)
`2120 +_ 150
`n-Decanol
`2-5 4- 1.7 (101 2090 + 150
`n-Dodecanol 4.1 4- 2-7 (8)
`23(10 + 150
`
`Effective
`diffusionb
`constant
`(D,.,) cm2 s
`x 10v
`5.4
`2.7
`1.3
`1.2
`1.4
`1-8
`1.4
`1.9
`2.2
`2.1
`2-1
`
`a. Data includc standard deviation and ( ) number of
`experiments.
`
`hz
`b. From t~ = 6D- (Mean value for h = (1-54 mm)
`
`Fig. 2 shows the effective diffusivities of the
`permeants in the nail plate tissue as a function of
`alkyl chain length,
`
`Theoretical considerations
`The nail plate’s barrier properties are governed by its
`anatomical construction and its physicochemical
`properties and a proposed model mnst be support-
`able in terms of both. The model developed here,
`although speculative, fulfills these requirements.
`The plate consists of a laminate of sheets of
`keratinized cells (Caputo & Dadati 1968; Forslind
`1970; Forslind & Thyresson 1975). Like the stratum
`
`2 of 6
`
`

`
`NAIL PERMEATION BY
`
`HOMOLOGO US ALCOI tOLS
`
`31
`
`lipid domain. The quantities hc and hM are the
`summed thicknesses of the cytoplasmic laminae and
`membrane lamellae passed through transcellularly.
`Added together these yield the total nail plate
`thickness. Common values of diffusivity (DM) and
`partition coefficient (KM) are given for the lipid
`elements of the two distinct routes but the 5"hM<<hl.
`even in the absence of a significant tortuosity factor.
`Finally, for all but the most polar permeants,
`DyaKMYh¢>>DcKcYhv as D~.<DM (likely) and
`Zh~a< <’Phi,. Therefore:
`
`Equation 5 gives the flux per unit area for typical
`permeants in terms of physically meaningful mass
`transfer parameters. The bracketed quality is a
`complex mass transfer coefficient or ’permeability
`coefficient’. Using the symbol P for the permeability
`coefficient, the statement J/A = PAC. applies
`generally for such mass transfer systems. The opera-
`tive parallel pathways are indicated by the two
`separate coUections of terms comprising P.
`The permeability coefficient profile for a homolo-
`gous series of permeants will depend upon how the
`diffusivities and partition coefficients in eqnation 5
`are affected by variation of length of the alkyl chain.
`It is impossible to predict how Dc and K~, might be
`affected as very little is known about solubility and
`molecular mobility in the nail’s dense, scmicrystal-
`line protein phases. Based on general considerations
`(Flynn et al 1974) and on partitioning behaviour of
`long chain fatty acids between the naiI plate and
`water (Baden 1970), KM may be assumed to follow
`the general o!w homologue partitioning pattern:
`
`log Kxl,o - log KM,o + =n
`
`(6)
`
`where K~.,, is the partition coefficient of the homo-
`logue of chain length n between a water immiscible
`phase and water and log K~.o is the Y-intercept of a
`plot KM.,, versus n. The term. =. is the slope of the
`log K versus n plot. The nature of the intercellular
`material is such that ~>0.3 and therefore KM.n can
`be expected to grow in an exponential fashion as the
`alkvl chain is extended.
`
`Relative permeabifin’ o1" rite n-alkanols through nail
`plate and stratum corneum
`The alkvl chain lenoth dependencv of permeabilitv
`
`of the n-alkanols (including water at n = 0) is shown
`in Fig. 1. From water to n-octanol permeability
`coefficients decrease systematically and by an overall
`factor of about 60. This observation rules out the
`possibility that a lipid pathway is involved for these
`permeants. Over the same alkyl chain length span
`diffusivities are also decreasing, but only several-
`fold. The lag time based diffusivities are on the order
`10-7 cm2 s 1 a magnitude which is physically
`plausible.
`A nominal molecular size sensitivity for diffusivity
`is evident considering the narrow spread in apparent
`D~ (Deffccm.e) values. Thus, there must be another
`cause for the decline in the permeability coefficients
`with increasing chain length. According to equation
`5 partitioning provides the only alternative basis for
`the declining trend: it would be necessary for the
`partition coefficients between the protein domain of
`the nail (keratin) and the external water to decrease
`about 25-fold. To our knowledge there is no
`precedent for such behaviour in a mass transfer
`framework under circumstances where the external
`media are aqueous. There are, however, some
`observations supporting the concept that the keratin
`matrix has a decreasing ability to dissolve the
`alkanols as the homologous series is ascended.
`Tillman & Higuchi (196i) note that the solvating and
`softening abilities of solvents for callus strips are in
`the o~der water > methanol >> ethanol. A great
`deal of work has been done on the sorption of
`solvents into hair and wool fibres and, according to
`Harrison & Speakman (!958), the fine structure of
`wool seems to be inaccessible to molecules larger
`than n-propanol. On the basis of the present work, it
`would appear that exclusion associated with increas-
`ing hydrophobicity is more a thermodynamic than a
`kinetic (molecular size) phenomenon. Hair (wool),
`callus and nail seem to have more in common
`chemically and physically with each other than they
`do with the stratum corneum (Baden 1970; Baden ct
`al 1973) and thus inferences drawn from the cited
`works have good probability of being applicable to
`the nail. Furthermore, at 10 7 cm2 s i the effective
`diffusivities are too large for an approximately
`25-fold factor to be incorporated and hidden in some
`complex way. It therefore appears that, to a rough
`first approximation, the nail plate acts as a concen-
`trated hydrogel to the alkanol permeants through
`n-octanol. The behaviour suggests there is a positive
`free energy change accompanying the transfer of a
`methylene group from the external, water medium
`to the intracellular protein phase.
`Skin permeation of the alkanols throuc, h n-octanol
`
`3 of 6
`
`

`
`¢-
`
`E
`u
`v
`
`%
`
`y__
`
`25
`1:3
`
`E
`
`13_
`
`J
`
`2O
`
`10
`
`1.0
`
`0.1
`
`,,,~ --Water
`
`K. A. V~ AI,TERS ET AI_
`
`]
`
`T )
`I/
`
`J
`
`. /
`
`The above picture allows consideration of diffu-
`sion across the nail plate at its first level of
`organizational complexity. For a given permeant,
`the principle mass current may either pass directly
`through the cell units stacked upon one another and
`separated by the intercellular substance, or may flow
`mainly around the cell contents by way of the
`interconnecting, extra-cellular lipid network. The
`first of these possibilities involves alternating pas-
`sages through two distinctly different domains.
`Based on the lipid content of the nail being totally
`extracellular and 1% of the total volume and on
`individual cell dimensions of 30 um diameter (hexa-
`gonal) and 1 !tm thickness, the latter route would
`offer a fractional area for diffusion of 5 x l0-a. At
`this percentage composition and with these cell
`dimensions, the calculated width of the region
`between cells is approximately 100 A, in reasonable
`agreement with ultra-microscopic estimates (Zaias &
`Alvarez 1968; Hashimoto 1971b). Allowance has to
`be made for diffusional path of the extracellular
`II 21 31 4 5 61 I i 71 8 91 i ll0 111 112
`route to be tortuous, having a path length up to, but
`not exceeding, 15 times (1/2 cell diameter), the nail’s
`width.
`The following equation can be formulated to
`describe flux across the nail plate as described using
`the general principles outlined by Flynn et al (1974):
`
`Alcohol alkyt chain length
`
`FIG. 1. Relationship between the logarithm of the per-
`meability coefficient and alkyl chain length of the alcohol
`
`corneum, the cytoplasmic keratin mass is partially
`crystalline and partially amorphous. In section, thin
`lipid seams are seen to separate the cell layers. This
`lipid is from the original cell membranes and is
`apparently supplemented by intercellular deposition
`of so-called membrane coating granules during tire
`plate’s formation (Hashimoto et al 1966; I Iashimoto
`1971a,b).
`
`2 5
`dl
`
`u 4
`C~
`
`~×3
`~57
`
`wE
`r;-i u 1
`
`i ~ I I I
`t /
`I I I [ I
`1 2 3 4 5 67 8 9 10 11 12
`length
`Alcohol atkyl chain
`
`FIr3.2. Effecive diffusivities of the permcants as a function
`of alkyl chain length of the alcohol,
`
`~- LERe + 5"RM +
`
`AC
`
`(3)
`
`Here J is the total flux (mass/time), A, is the area of
`application, and f~ and ft. are the fractional areas
`available for the transcellular and lipid routes
`respectively. The terms Rc and R~4 are the summed
`resistances of the two types of lamina encountered
`transcellularly while RI. is the resistance of the
`extracellular lipid route. The term AC is the driving
`force for the mass transfer process measured as the
`concentration difference across the nail plate.
`Equation 3 can be made more explicit by including
`the estimated fractional areas and by defining the
`resistances in terms of effective thicknesses (h),
`diffusivities within phases (D), and partition coeffi-
`cients (K):
`
`J
`y 0-9995DcDMKcKM
`A ~ DMKMZhc +DcKcZhM +
`L
`
`(4)
`
`5 X 10-4DMKM -]A
`5
`hl.
`The subscript c is used to indicate the intracellular
`protein domain and the subscript M the extracellular
`
`C
`
`4 of 6
`
`

`
`32
`
`K. A. WALTERS EI’ AL
`
`is strikingly different (Blank 1964; Scheuplein 1965;
`Behl et al 1980; Durrheim et al 1980; Flynn et al
`1981). As the alkyl chain length is increased,
`permeability coefficients also increase, with the
`increase being essentially exponential past ethanol.
`Such behaviour signifies that the stratum corneum
`functions for the most part as a hydrophobic mem-
`brane to these permeants, with increased perme-
`ability coefficients the result of increased partition-
`ing into some critical hydrophobic phase within the
`horny structure. The stratum corneum’s far greater
`lipid content undoubtedly plays a role here, setting
`its membrane behaviour apart from that of the nail
`and perhaps other cornified tissues.
`The striking increase in nail plate permeability
`coefficients from n-octanol to n-dodecanol signals a
`change in diffusional mechanism. Now permeability
`is increasing with increased hydrophobicity of the
`permeants, an unmistakable indication of the
`emergence of a functionally lipid pathway. Equa-
`tions 4 and 5 were formulated with such a route in
`mind, namely a route through the intercellular
`seams, with the collection of terms,
`5 x 10-aDMKM/hL, representing the route’s diffusive
`contribution. Regardless of whether the placemcnt
`of the lipid pathway is anatomically proper, the
`route’s essential trait is an exponentially increasing
`distributioning with increased alkyl chain length, as
`described in equation 6. Even a fractionally minor
`lipid route will assume rate-controlling proportions
`at an appropriately long alkyl chain length providing
`no other competitive pathway has a partitioning
`sensitivity. The transition to lipid pathway control
`occurs with but a slight increase in effective diffusiv-
`ity based on the effective diffusivities of n-decanol
`and n-dodecanol. It would appear that the route is
`not tortuous as these effective diffusivities do not
`allow for great non-linearity in path. The appearance
`of this route so late on the alkyl chain length profile is
`consistent with its limited fractional area, which we
`estimate to be about 1/100 of that of the same
`pathway in stratum corneum. With a methylene unit
`partitioning factor (=) of t>0.3 as suggested by
`literature data (Baden 1970), the alkvl fragment
`necessary to place the permeation process into
`extracellular control would have to be five to six
`carbons longer than it would for the stratum cor-
`neum, and this is very close to what is experimentally
`observed. Assuming a fractional area of 5 × 10 a
`and otherwise using the permeability data in Table 1,
`the partition coefficient between the extracellular
`lipid substance and water necessary to account for
`dodecanol’s high permeability coefficient can be
`
`estimated, ie. P-~ fLDMKM/hM, and KM is about
`6000. This value is certainly not too large considering
`the extended length of the alkyl chain.
`
`It is thus evident that the nail plate as a membrane
`behaves in a manner widely different from the
`epidermis (stratum corneum). There are other dif-
`ferences. The absolute rate of water transpiration
`through the nail is faster than through the intact skin
`(-~10 times) and, if the rate is thickness-normalized,
`the ratio is approximately 1000 in favour of the nail.
`
`Over a wide polarity range nail plate permeability is
`inversely related to polarity while the reverse is true
`for the stratum corneum. The declining nail plate
`permeability appears related to decreasing affinity of
`the keratin matrix for the higher alkanols. Attempts
`to confirm this supposition by way of equilibrium
`partitioning were not entirely successful.
`At extrcme hydrophobicities (~>Cs) a new path-
`way for diffusion through the nail becomes evident.
`And from n-octanol to n-dodecanol equilibrium
`partition coefficients increased exponentially, a
`trend generally supportive of the lipid character of
`the route. A partition coefficient for n-dodecanol of
`131 _+ 24 was obtained. If it is assumed that this Ci2
`homologue is concentrated exclusively in the lipid
`domain, which overall is estimated to occupy
`approximately 0.01 volume fraction, then dodecan-
`ol’s intrinsic partition coefficient would be 13 000.
`
`This value is only a little over twice the value
`computed from the permeability coefficient using a
`fractional area for diffusion of 5 × 10-4. Given all
`uncertainties, this is in reasonable if not fortuitous
`accord.
`
`It seems likely to us that the alkanol permeability
`pattern of the nail plate reflects general nail behav-
`iour and thus suggests how other low molecular
`weight organics might permeate. If this supposition
`is true, then very polar compounds might be surpris-
`ingly easily delivered through the nail plate to
`underlying tissues. The fact that urea can be used to
`chemically loosen and separate the nail plate from its
`bed is a supporting observation (Farber & South
`1978). The low incidence of problems associated
`with the use of powerful hydrophobic organic
`solvents in nail laquer seems equally reinforcing.
`Certainly toxic and irritant properties of substances
`measured via patch tests on skin cannot be extrapol-
`ated to the nail. Moreover, physicochemical criteria
`governing the selection of therapeutic candidates to
`treat nail disorders would seem to be very different
`from the established criteria used for drug selection
`for the skin.
`
`5 of 6
`
`

`
`NAIL PERMEATION BY HOMOLOGOUS ALCOHOLS
`
`33
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Baden, H. P. (1970) J. Invest. Dcrm. 55:115-122
`Baden, H. P., Goldsmilh, L. A., Fleming. B. 11973)
`Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 322:269-278
`Behl, C. R., Flynn. G. L., Kurihara. T., Smith, W..
`Higuchi, W. I., rio, N. F. H., Pierson, C. L. 11980) J.
`Invest. Derm. 75:346-352
`Blank, I. H. (1964) Ibid. 43:415-4211
`Burch, G. E., Winsor. T (1946) Arch. Derm. Syph. 51:
`39-4l
`Caputo, R., Dadati, E. (1968) Arch. Klin. Exp, Derm. 231:
`344-354
`Durrheim, H., Flynn, G. L., Higuchi, W. I., Behl, C. R.
`(1980) J. Pharm. Sci.. 69:781-786
`Farber, E. M., South, D. A. (1978) Cutis 22. 689-692
`Flynn, G. L., Durrheim, II.. Itiguchi, W. I. (1981) J.
`Pharm. Sei. 70:52 56
`Flynn, G, L., Yalkowsky. S. H.. Roseman, T. J. 11974)
`Ibid. 63:479-5111
`Forslind, B. (1970) Acta. Derm. Venereol 50:161-168
`Forslind, B,, Thyresson, N. 11975) Arch. Derm. Forsch.
`254:199-204
`
`Harrison, D., Spcakman. J. B. (1958) Textile Rcs. J. 28:
`1005 1007
`Hashimoto. K. (1971a) Ultrastructure Res. 36:391-410
`Hashimoto, K. (1971b) Arch. Derm. Forsch. 240:1-22
`Hashimoto, K., Bernard. G. G.. Nelson, R., Lever, W. F.
`(1966) J. Invest. Derm. 47:2115-217
`Ho, N. F. H., Park, J. Y., Morozowich, W., ttiguchi, W. 1.
`11977) In: Roche, E. B. (ed.) "Design of Biopharmaceut-
`ical Properties through Prodrugs & Analogs American
`Pharmaceutical Association, Washinglon, pp 131",-227
`Hwang, S., Owada, E.. Yotsunganagi, T., Suhardja, L.,
`Ho, N. F. H.. Flvnn, G. L.. Hignchi, W. I. (1976) J.
`Pharm. Sci. 65:1i74-1578
`Scheuplein, R, J. 11965) J. Invest. Derm. 45:334-346
`Spruit, D. 11971) Ibid. 56:359-361
`Tillman, W. J.. Higuchi, T. (1961) J. Invest. Derm. 37:
`87-92
`Waiters, K. A., Flynn, G. L, Marvel, J. R. 11981) J.
`Invest. Derm. 76:76-79
`Zaias, N., Alvarez, J. 11968)J. Invest. Derm. 51:12/>136
`
`6 of 6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket