throbber
SUPPORTED BY AN EDUCATIONAL GRANT FROM PFIZER INC
`
`Onychomycosis" therapeutic update
`
`Richard K. Scher, MD New York, New York
`
`Onychomycosis is a common disease of the nail unit caused by dermatophytes, yeasts, and
`molds. In more than 80% of cases, onychomycosis is caused by the dermatophytes
`Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes. The prevalence of onychomyco-
`sis in the world’s population is 2% to 18% or higher and accounts for approximately 50%
`of all nail disorders. Until recently, available therapies were inadequate because of low
`cure rates, high relapse rates, and often dangerous side effects. An increased understand-
`ing of nail pharmacokinetics has led to the development of safer, more effective systemic
`therapies for onychomycosis, such as itraconazole, fluconazole, and terbinafine. These
`new oral antifungal agents allow shorter periods of treatment, provide rapid efficacy, and
`may improve patient compliance and attitudes regarding therapy. Treatment selection will
`depend on several factors, including appropriate spectrum of activity, adverse effects, and
`potential drug interactions plus patient preferences for specific dosing regimens. (J Am
`Acad Dermatol 1999;40:$21-6.)
`
`Onychomycosis is a common fungal infection
`of 1 or more components of the nail unit.1
`Although the exact prevalence is unknown, ony-
`chomycosis accounts for up to 50% of all nail dis-
`ease and affects 2% to 18% or more of the world’s
`population.2-4 The incidence of onychomycosis
`increases with age, and some studies suggest that
`up to 48% of the population may be affected by
`age 70 years.1 Toenail infection is several times
`more common than fingernail infection and is gen-
`erally more difficult to treat because of the slow
`rate of toenail growth.1
`In the United States and other developed coun-
`tries, the incidence of onychomycosis may have
`increased dramatically in recent years. This is like-
`ly the result of such factors as the aging of the pop-
`ulation, possible higher incidence of diabetes mel-
`litus, greater use ofimmunosuppressive and antibi-
`otic agents, increased exposure to infecting
`organisms, and the acquired immunodeficiency
`syndrome epidemic),2
`
`From the Department of Dermatology, Columbia-Presbyterian
`Medical Center, New York, New York.
`This work was supported by a research grant from Pfizer Inc. The
`author has also served as an investigator, consultant, and a speak-
`er for Novartis, Pfizer, and Janssen. CMD, Inc. assisted in the writ-
`ing of this article.
`Reprint requests: Richard K. Scher, MD, Department of Dermatology,
`Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave,
`Room 750, NewYork, NY 10032.
`Copyright © 1999 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
`0190-9622/99/$8.00 + 0 16/0/98108
`
`Table I. Principal causes of onychomycosis
`
`Dermatophytes
`T rubrum
`T mentagrophytes
`Epidermophyton floccosum
`Nondermatophytes
`Acremonium
`Aspergillus
`Onychocola canadensis
`S brevicauHs
`Scytalidium dimidiatum
`S hyalinum
`Yeasts
`C albicans
`
`From Elewsld BE, Charif MA, Daniel CR III. Onychomycosis. In:
`Scher RK, Daniel CR III, editors. Nails: diagnosis, treatment,
`surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997. p. 151-62. By
`permission.
`
`In more than 80% of cases, onychomycosis is
`caused by the dermatophytes Trichophyton
`rubrum and T mentagrophytes and is then referred
`to as tinea unguium.2 Yeasts are responsible for
`between 5% and 17% of cases of onychomycosis,
`and in over 70% of these cases Candida albicans
`is the infecting organism. The nondermatophyte
`molds Scopulariopsis, Scytalidium, Acremonium,
`Aspergillus, and Fusarium cause approximately
`3% to 5% of fungal nail disease (Table I))-3
`Far from being merely a cosmetic issue, ony-
`chomycosis may have serious emotional and phys-
`ical consequences for the patient.2,5 The condition
`
`$21
`
`ACRUX DDS PTY LTD. et al.
`EXHIBIT 1033
`IPR Petition for
`U.S. Patent No. 7,214,506
`
`1 of 6
`
`

`

`$22 Scher
`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`June 1999
`
`Table II. Treatment selection criteria in
`onychomycosis
`
`Causative pathogen
`Potential adverse effects
`Potential drug interactions
`Dosage schedule
`Patient compliance
`Age and health of patient
`Allergic history
`Prior antifungal therapy
`Cost
`
`From Elewsld BE, Charif MA, Daniel CR III. Onychomycosis. In:
`Scher RK, Daniel CR III, editors. Nails: diagnosis, treatment,
`surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997. p. 151-62.
`
`may be associated with significant pain and dis-
`comfort; in severe cases, onychomycosis could lead
`to disfigurement and loss of dexterity and mobility.
`As a recent quality-of-life study by Lubeck et al6
`has demonstrated, onychomycosis can impose sig-
`nificant psychologic and social limitations.7 In this
`study, supported by Sandoz Research Institute,
`patients with fungal nail disease reported avoiding
`intimate and social situations for fear of exposing
`their disfigured nails and experienced difficulties
`with work-related activities requiring them to use
`their fingers or to be on their feet for long periods
`of time.
`Treatment of onychomycosis has traditionally
`been difficult, in part because of the unique
`absorption properties of the nail unit. To be effec-
`tive, antifungal drugs must penetrate the affected
`nail tissue and remain in high concentrations until
`the pathogen is eradicated.8 Topical antifungal
`drugs, which poorly penetrate the nail plate, have
`only limited use in onychomycosis treatment.4
`The early systemic treatments, griseofulvin and
`ketoconazole, have also proved unsatisfactory.4,8
`Griseofulvin has a narrow spectrum of activity and
`requires prolonged courses of treatment; low cure
`rates and high relapse rates further limit its useful-
`ness in onychomycosis.4,8 Although ketoconazole
`has demonstrated higher cure rates than griseofulvin,
`prolonged therapy (12 to 18 months for toenails) is
`required, and relapse rates have been high. In addi-
`tion, ketoconazole carries a risk of drug interactions
`and serious adverse effects, such as hepatotoxicity.8
`
`NEW TREATMENT OPTIONS
`
`The newer agents itraconazole, fluconazole, and
`terbinafine show great promise in the treatment of
`
`fungal nail disease. Pharmacokinetic studies indi-
`cate that these drugs reach the distal end of the nail
`shortly after therapy begins.2 When selecting
`among these agents, however, several factors need
`to be considered, including efficacy against the
`causative pathogen, potential adverse effects and
`drug interactions, dosage regimens, cost, and com-
`pliance issues (Table II).l
`
`Itraconazole
`
`Itraconazole, like fluconazole, is a triazole anti-
`fungal agent. The 3 nitrogen atoms in the 5-mem-
`ber triazole ring may be responsible for itracona-
`zole’s broad spectrum of activity, which includes
`dermatophytes, yeasts, and nondermatophyte
`molds; improved tissue penetration; and lower tox-
`icity compared with ketoconazole. Unlike keto-
`conazole, an imidazole derivative, the triazoles
`have increased specificity for fungal rather than
`mammalian cytochrome P-450 enzymes at thera-
`peutic levels, which significantly decreases the
`risk of drug interactions.9
`Mechanism of action. Itraconazole is fungista-
`tic in vitro; it impairs ergosterol synthesis in fun-
`gal cells by blocking the cytochrome P-450-
`dependent enzyme lanosterol cl4-~z-demethylase.
`This results in decreased ergosterol and increased
`lanosterol in the fungal cell membrane, which
`alters its function and permeability. This mecha-
`nism of action is common to all azoles.9
`Pharmacokinetics. Itraconazole is well absorbed
`when administered orally with food but is erratically
`absorbed with changing gastric pH. However, it
`achieves excellent tissue distribution. The pharma-
`cokinetic properties of itraconazole are related to its
`pronounced lipophilicity.3 The plasma half-life
`varies between 15 and 25 hours; the peak plasma
`concentration is reached within 2 to 4 hours after a
`single 100-mg dose. Itraconazole also binds firmly
`to protein and has a marked affinity for lipids) The
`slow elimination of itraconazole from tissues may
`explain its continued therapeutic efficacy after treat-
`ment is discontinued.3 Itraconazole also has a strong
`affinity for keratinized tissue, which results in high
`drug concentrations in the nails and explains the
`drug’s efficacy in onychomycosis) The concentra-
`tion of itraconazole in nails, 90 days after a 7-day
`course of medication, greatly exceeds the minimum
`inhibitory concentration (MIC) of common der-
`matophytes.1°
`Dosing. Two dosing schedules have been inves-
`
`2 of 6
`
`

`

`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`Volume 40, Number 6, Part 2
`
`Scher $23
`
`tigated: continuous and intermittent (pulse) thera-
`py. The fixed dosage of itraconazole is 200 mg
`daily for 12 weeks in onychomycosis of the toenail
`and for 8 weeks in fingernail disease. Studies
`demonstrate that although the nail is not yet nor-
`mal when therapy ends, the new nail will grow free
`of fungus because of the continued presence of
`itraconazole in the nail.1 Pulse or intermittent ther-
`apy is based on the rationale that the drug reaches
`the nail within 7 days of therapy and remains there
`for 6 to 9 months, although serum levels of the
`drug are no longer detectable 1 week after discon-
`tinuation of therapy.1 The Food and Drug Admin-
`istration recently approved 2 pulse doses of itra-
`conazole for onychomycosis of the fingernails, but
`no pulse therapy has been approved for toenails at
`present. Intermittent cycles of 400 mg daily for 1
`week per month can be continued for 2 months for
`fingernail infection and 3 months for toenail infec-
`tion.1 Cure rates approaching 80% have been
`reported in European studies with these regi-
`mens,11 although cure rates have been lower in
`other studies. 12
`Efficacy. Results of US studies of itraconazole
`effectiveness in the toenail have shown a mycolog-
`ic cure rate of 54%, a clinical success rate of 65%,
`and an overall success rate (clinical success and
`mycologic cure) of 35%.1 Investigators using itra-
`conazole in toenail infections at doses of 200
`mg/day for 3 months have reported mycologic
`cure rates of 86% at 9 months and 79% at 12
`months.2 At 18-month follow-up, mycologic cure
`rates decreased to 67%. Relapse rates in toenail
`infections at 9 and 12 months after treatment with
`this regimen have been reported to be 9% to 11%.2
`Safety. The principal safety concern regarding
`itraconazole relates to its potential for serious drug
`interactions. Elevated liver function tests have been
`reported in 0.3% to 5% of patients receiving itra-
`conazole therapy, but symptomatic hepatic injury
`has rarely been reported. In general, liver function
`tests return to normal 4 to 10 weeks after therapy is
`discontinued. Itraconazole should be avoided dur-
`ing pregnancy (Food and Drug Administration
`Pregnancy Category C), and women of childbear-
`ing age should be advised to take adequate contra-
`ceptive precautions during therapy.2
`Adverse effects. The adverse effects reported
`for itraconazole by more than 1% of patients in
`clinical trials for the treatment of onychomycosis
`of the fingernail are as follows: headache (5%),
`
`pruritus (5%), nausea (5%), rhinitis (5%), rash
`(3%), and dyspepsia (3%).13 Other side effects
`reported include dizziness, fatigue, fever, somno-
`lence, impotence, decreased libido, and malaise.2
`Drug interactions and contraindications.
`Itraconazole and its major metabolite are potent
`inhibitors of the cytochrome P-450 3A4 enzyme
`system. Concomitant use of itraconazole with
`drugs metabolized by this enzyme system may
`result in increased plasma concentrations of these
`drugs, leading to potentially serious or life-threat-
`ening events. Coadministration ofitraconazole and
`drugs such as terfenadine, astemizole, simvastatin,
`lovastatin, midazolam, triazolam, and cisapride are
`specifically contraindicated. Coadministration of
`itraconazole with drugs such as digoxin, cyclo-
`sporine, and phenytoin requires close monitoring.
`When oral warfarin or hypoglycemic agents are
`coadministered with itraconazole, prothrombin time
`and blood glucose levels may also require monitor-
`ing.2,3,13 Food increases the gastrointestinal absorp-
`tion of itraconazole, whereas antacids and gastric
`acid secretion suppressors that lower gastric acidity
`decrease absorption of itraconazole.2
`
`Fluconazole
`
`Fluconazole is an oral antifungal agent with
`activity against dermatophytes, Candida, and
`some nondermatophyte molds. It has only recently
`been studied as a potential therapy for onychomy-
`cosis. Fluconazole has a distinct chemical struc-
`ture and unique pharmacologic and pharmacoki-
`netic properties.
`Fluconazole is a bis-triazole, having 2 triazole
`groups with each containing 3 nitrogen atoms.
`Fluorine atoms in the 2 and 4 positions of the
`phenyl ring contribute to fluconazole’s decreased
`lipophilicity and protein binding (approximately
`12%), resistance to metabolism, increased speci-
`ficity, and higher potency compared with other
`azole antifungal agents.9 A hydroxyl group and
`low molecular weight also make fluconazole more
`water-soluble than the other azoles, which results
`in rapid absorption, high bioavailability (>90%),
`and wide tissue distribution. Fluconazole has a
`volume of distribution similar to that of water in
`the body, a long half-life (30 hours), and dose-pro-
`portional serum concentrations.9
`Mechanism of action. The mechanism of
`action is similar to the other azoles. As with itra-
`conazole, fluconazole is fungistatic in vitro. The
`
`3 of 6
`
`

`

`$24 Scher
`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`June 1999
`
`triazoles have a high affinity for fungal cyto-
`chrome P-450 enzymes but a very weak affinity
`for mammalian P-450 enzymes. In C albicans, the
`azoles inhibit transformation of blastospores into
`the invasive mycelium form.9
`Pharmacokinetics. Studies have demonstrated
`that fluconazole penetrates nails rapidly. In a small
`pilot study, Hay14 found that fluconazole was
`detectable in nails within 2 hours after a single 50-
`mg oral dose. Fluconazole accumulates well in or
`on the stratum comeum of nails, reaching levels up
`to 50 times those found in plasma, and remains
`there even after the drug is no longer detectable in
`plasma. This factor is believed to contribute to the
`continued improvement observed in some patients
`even after the end of active treatment.4 Recent
`studies have demonstrated that concentrations of
`fluconazole are found 2 weeks after the onset of
`treatment and throughout the treatment and post-
`treatment period were well above the MIC for der-
`matophytes and nondermatophytes,s Unlike keto-
`conazole and itraconazole, food intake and gastric
`pH do not affect fluconazole absorption or bio-
`availability.4
`Dosing. The most common dosage regimen of
`fluconazole prescribed for skin and nail infections
`world-wide is 150 to 300 mg once weekly.15
`However, depending on the clinical situation,
`dosages may vary. The duration of treatment is
`usually 2 weeks for tinea corporis, 4 to 6 weeks for
`tinea pedis, and 6 to 12 months for toenails until
`regrown.16 Different doses of fluconazole have
`been investigated in the treatment of onychomyco-
`sis but none have yet been FDA approved. Doses
`of 50 to 100 mg daily or on alternate days until the
`normal nail has grown out have been shown to be
`effective.2 In a study of 11 patients with ony-
`chomycosis of the toenail and fingernail, 8 patients
`received fluconazole 300 mg once weekly, 1
`patient received 200 mg once weekly, and 2
`patients received alternate-day therapy with 100
`mg or 200 mg of fluconazole. Eight of the patients
`also received a topical antimycotic treatment. All 6
`patients with toenail involvement were clinically
`cured after a mean duration of 6 months. All 5
`patients with fingernail involvement were cured
`after 3.7 months. No adverse laboratory or clinical
`adverse events were recorded.17
`The use of chemical urea nail avulsion with flu-
`conazole therapy has also been demonstrated to
`improve cure rates.1 In patients who do not
`
`respond to treatment, the dose of fluconazole can
`be increased to 300 or 450 mg once weekly.1 This
`once-weekly regimen may be especially useful for
`patients who are receiving multiple medications
`and for whom compliance may be an issue.1
`Efficacy. The efficacy of fluconazole in ony-
`chomycosis is well studied. Montero-Gei et alis
`demonstrated that fluconazole 150 mg once week-
`ly for 3 to 12 months for dermatophyte infections
`of the fingernails and toenails produced a favor-
`able clinical response in 97% of patients at the end
`of treatment and in 87% at follow-up. A multicen-
`ter trial by Frfiki et a119 in Finland reported similar
`results. Treatment with 150 mg of fluconazole
`once weekly for 5 to 12 months was effective and
`well tolerated and produced a favorable clinical
`response in 77% of patients at follow-up.
`In a recent study by Scher et al,15 treatment of
`onychomycosis of the toenail with dosages of flu-
`conazole ranging between 150 and 450 mg once
`weekly for a mean period of 6 to 7 months result-
`ed in a clinical success rate greater than 86% with
`a low relapse rate.
`Safety. More than 50 million adult and pediatric
`patients worldwide have taken fluconazole for fun-
`gal infections (including vaginal candidiasis,
`oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis), skin
`and nail infections, systemic candidiasis, and cryp-
`tococcal meningitis. The use of doses of 400 mg/
`day in severely ill, immunocompromised patients
`confirms the safety and tolerability of flucona-
`zole.4 Fluconazole is well tolerated, and hepato-
`toxicity is rare. Daily doses as high as 1600 to
`2000 mg have been shown to be effective and well
`tolerated in severely ill patients, although these
`higher doses are not yet approved for use in most
`countries. Thus doses used in skin and nail infec-
`tions are well below the maximum doses in this
`wide dosage-safety margin.
`Adverse effects. Most researchers acknowl-
`edge that analyzing the adverse reactions associat-
`ed with fluconazole is difficult because the drug
`has been used primarily in patients with severe
`underlying disease.2 In studies involving 4000
`patients receiving fluconazole therapy for 7 days
`or more for various indications, the incidence of
`side effects was 16%.2,4 Treatment was discontin-
`ued in 1.3% of patients because of laboratory test
`abnormalities and in 1.5% of patients because of
`adverse clinical effects. These were mainly gas-
`trointestinal disturbances. Other reported side
`
`4 of 6
`
`

`

`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`Volume 40, Number 6, Part 2
`
`Scher $25
`
`effects included headaches, rash (such as urticaria
`or papulomacular or morbilliform eruptions),
`exfoliative skin eruptions, abnormal liver function
`tests, and, in some instances, hepatotoxicity)6
`Drug interactions and eontraindieations.
`Rifampin enhances fluconazole metabolism,
`whereas fluconazole increases the prothrombin
`time of coumarin-type anticoagulants and increas-
`es the plasma concentrations of phenytoin and
`cyclosporine)6 In addition, fluconazole increases
`serum theophylline concentrations and may
`increase the bioavailability of oral hypoglycemic
`agents. As with other azole antifungal drugs, coad-
`ministration of fluconazole with terfenadine,
`astemizole, or cisapride is contraindicated.2,3,16
`Unlike itraconazole, absorption of fluconazole is
`not affected by antacids or by drugs that increase
`gastric pH)6
`
`Terbinaflne
`
`Terbinafine is a member of the allylamine class
`of antifungal agents. It exerts its antifungal effects
`at an earlier phase in fungal-cell membrane devel-
`opment than do the azoles)4
`Mechanism of action. Terbinafine’s mecha-
`nism of action is different than the azoles. It blocks
`ergosterol synthesis by inhibiting squalene epoxi-
`dase. This inhibition results in an increase in squa-
`lene, which is toxic to fungal cells. In vitro,
`terbinafine is primarily fungicidal against der-
`matophytes, Aspergillus species, Scopulariopsis
`brevicaulis, Sporothrix schenckii, and the dimor-
`phic fungi Blastomyces dermatitidis and Histo-
`plasma capsulatum. Activity against yeasts is vari-
`able. Terbinafine is more active against C parap-
`silosis than C albicans.2
`Pharmaeokineties. Oral terbinafine reaches the
`nail plate by diffusion from both the nail bed and
`nail matrix.9 When 250 rag/day of terbinafine was
`administered to healthy volunteers, the drug was
`detected in peripheral nail clippings after 7 days.9
`The concentration of terbinafine in nails 90 days
`after a 7-day course of medication greatly exceed-
`ed the MIC of common dermatophytes.9
`Dosing. A 6-week course of 250 rag/day of
`terbinafine is effective in fingernail disease; a 12-
`week course at the same dose is generally effective
`in toenail disease),9
`Efficacy. In standard long-term treatment (6
`months for fingernails, 12 months for toenails),
`250 rag/day of terbinafine demonstrated mycolog-
`
`ic cure rates of 95% for fingernail and 80% for toe-
`nail infections. At 250 mg/day for 3 months, 82% of
`patients achieved mycologic cure at 1 year after
`treatment. When treatment regimens of 250 mg/day
`for 6, 12, and 24 weeks were compared, it was
`shown that for onychomycosis of the toenail, a 12-
`week course of treatment was comparable to 24
`weeks of therapy. A regimen of 250 mg/day for 6
`weeks in fingernail infection and 12 weeks in toenail
`infections achieved 90% and 80% cure rates, respec-
`tively. At 12 months, relapse rates were between 6%
`and 12% for fingernails and toenails, respectively?
`Safety. Terbinafine is generally safe and well
`tolerated, and there are few significant drug inter-
`actions. Although hepatotoxic reactions are rare,
`many experts believe that periodic monitoring of
`liver function and hematopoietic parameters is rea-
`sonable, as for itraconazole and fluconazole)
`Adverse effects. The most common adverse
`effect reported with terbinafine in 3 US/Canadian
`clinical trials was headache, occurring in 12.9% of
`patients. Gastrointestinal disturbances and skin
`reactions accounted for most other adverse effects:
`diarrhea (5.8%), dyspepsia (4.3%), and nausea
`(2.6%); and rash, including urticaria (6.7%), and
`pruritus (2.8%).20 Less common side effects re-
`ported included fatigue, inability to concentrate,
`pain (back, leg, and flank), taste disturbances,
`erectile dysfunction, transient hypoglycemia, and
`elevated liver function tests. No specific muta-
`genic effects have been reported with terbinafine,
`and animal studies reveal no evidence of embry-
`onic or fetal toxicity or teratogenicity.2
`Drug interactions and eontraindieations.
`Terbinafine does not significantly induce or inhib-
`it the clearance of drugs metabolized by the
`cytochrome P-450 enzyme system; therefore at
`therapeutic levels, the potential for drug interac-
`tions is much lower for terbinafine than for the
`azoles. However, drugs that induce these enzymes,
`such as rifampin or phenobarbital, will increase
`plasma clearance of terbinafine, whereas drugs
`that inhibit these enzymes, such as cimetidine, will
`reduce terbinafine clearance. Bioavailability of
`terbinafine is not affected by the presence of
`food.2,20 The only contraindication is hypersensi-
`tivity to terbinafine.2°
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`Systemic treatment of onychomycosis has
`improved dramatically with the availability of the
`
`5 of 6
`
`

`

`$26 Scher
`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`June 1999
`
`newer antifungal agents itraconazole, fluconazole,
`and terbinafine. These drugs are generally safe and
`well tolerated and may allow shorter treatment
`periods. Selection of agents will depend on sever-
`al factors including spectrum of activity, potential
`for drug interactions, adverse effects, and patient
`preferences for specific dosage regimens. Treat-
`ment regimens range from continuous treatment
`with terbinafine for brief periods to pulse dosing
`with itraconazole 1 week each month or once-
`weekly dosing with fluconazole.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Elewski BE, CharifMA, Daniel CR III. Onychomycosis.
`In: Scher RK, Daniel CR III, editors. Nails: diagnosis,
`treatment, surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders,
`1997. p. 151-62.
`2. Chiritescu MM, Chiritescu M-E, Scher RK. Newer sys-
`temic antifungal drugs for the treatment of onychomyco-
`sis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 1996; 13:741-58.
`3. Elewski BE, Hay RJ. Update on the management ofony-
`chomycosis: highlights on the Third Annual Inter-
`national Summit in Cutaneous Antifungal Therapy. Clin
`Infect Dis 1996;23:305-13.
`4. Elewski BE. Once-weekly fluconazole in the treatment
`of onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38:$73-6.
`5. Scher RK. Onychomycosis is more than a cosmetic prob-
`lem. Br J Dermatol 1994; 130(suppl): 15.
`6. Lubeck DP, Patrick DL, McNulty R Fifer SK, Birnbaum
`J. Quality of life of persons with onychomycosis. Qual
`Life Res 1993;2:341-48.
`7. Drake LA, Scher RK, Smith EB, et al. Effect of ony-
`chomycosis on quality of life. J Am Acad Dermatol
`1998;38:702-4.
`8. Rich R Scher RK, Brenemax~ D, et ah Pharmacokinetics
`of three doses of once-weekly fluconazole (150, 300, and
`450 rag) in the treatment of distal subungual onychomy-
`
`cosis of the toenail. J AmAcad Dermatol 1998;38:S103-
`9.
`9. Gupta AK, Scher RK, De Doncker R Current manage-
`ment of onychomycosis: an overview. Dermatol Clin
`1997;15:121-35.
`10. Meinhof W. Kinetics and spectrum of activity of oral
`antifungals: the therapeutic implications. J Am Acad
`Dermatol 1993;29:$37-41.
`11. DeDoncker P, Decroix J, Pi~raJ:d GE, et al. Antifungal
`pulse therapy for onychomycosis: a pharmacokinetic and
`phaJ:macodynamic investigation of monthly cycles of 1-
`week pulse therapy with itraconazole. Arch Dermatol
`1996;132:34-41.
`12. Epstein E. How often does oral treatment of toenail ony-
`chomycosis produce a disease-free nail? An analysis of
`published data. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134:1551-4.
`13. Sporanox® (itraconazole) 100 mg capsules: package
`insert. Titusville (NJ): Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc.
`14. Hay RJ. Onychomycosis: agents of choice. Dermatol
`Clin 1993;11:161-9.
`15. Scher RK, Breneman D, Rich P, et al. A placebo-con-
`trolled, randomized, double-blind trial of once-weekly
`fluconazole (150, 300, or 450 rag) in the treatment of
`distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail. J Am
`Acad Dermatol 1998;38:$77-86.
`16. Diflucan® (fluconazole tablets). Package insert. New
`York: Pfizer Inc.
`17. Assaf RR, Elewski BE. Intermittent fluconazole dosing
`in patients with onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol
`1996;35:216-9.
`18. Montero-Gei F, Robles-Soto ME, Schlager H. Flu-
`conazole treatment of severe onychomycosis. Int J
`Dermatol 1996;35:587-8.
`19. Frfiki JE, Heikkilfi HT, Kero MO, et ah An open-label,
`noncomparative, multicenter evaluation of fluconazole
`with or without urea nail pedicure for the treatment of
`onychomycosis. Curt Ther Res 1997;58:481-91.
`20. Lamisil® (terbinafine hydrochloride tablets). Package
`insert. East Hanover (N J): Novartis Pharmaceuticals
`Corporation.
`
`6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket