throbber
Valeant Under Criminal Investigation - WSJ
`
`https://www.wsj.com/articles/valeant-under-criminal-investigation-1470...
`
`▼
`
`▼
`
`▼
`
`▲
`
`▲
`
`▲
`
`This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers visit
`http://www.djreprints.com.
`
`http://www.wsj.com/articles/valeant-under-criminal-investigation-1470868752
`
`Valeant for a long time successfully pursued a business model focused not on discovering drugs but on selling
`products it acquired from others, often at significant price increases. PHOTO: RON ANTONELLI/BLOOMBERG
`NEWS
`
`▲
`
`1 of 3
`
`10/30/2017, 2:39 PM
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`ACRUX DDS PTY LTD. et al.
`
`EXHIBIT 1528
`
`IPR Petition for
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,214,506
`
`

`

`Valeant Under Criminal Investigation - WSJ
`
`https://www.wsj.com/articles/valeant-under-criminal-investigation-1470...
`
`Philidor has previously said its employees "behaved ethically" when dispensing
`drugs to patients. Philidor representatives couldn't be reached for comment.
`
`Valeant. of Canada. has previously said in public filings that U.S. Attorney offices,
`including in Manhattan, have requested information from it on a wide range of
`subjects including "patient assistance programs .. .its former relationship with
`Philidor and other pharmacies" and "the Company's pricing (including
`discounts and rebates), marketing and distribution of its products."
`
`Valeant for a long time successfully pursued a business model focused not on
`discovering drugs but on selling products it acquired from others, often at
`significant price increases. It started using Philidor a few years ago, but didn't
`disclose the relationship to investors until October of last year, when accounting
`and other questions about it arose.
`
`Valeant later said it was severing all business ties with Philidor and that it would
`restate earnings based on an accounting error related to the pharmacy.
`
`Prosecutors, one person said, are investigating Andrew Davenport and Matthew
`Davenport in connection with Philidor. Corporate reports show Andrew
`Davenport was one of two founding Philidor principals. He was Philidor's chief
`executive officer when the Philadelphia area-based company wound down its
`business earlier this year.
`
`Documents filed with California's Board of Pharmacy in December 2014 and
`June 2015list MatthewS. Davenport as Philidor's chief executive. Matthew
`Davenport is an executive with BQ6 Media Group, its website says. The company
`shares Philidor's address. The Wall Street Journal has reported that former
`Philidor employees said BQ6 consulted for Valeant.
`
`Neither Matthew Davenport nor Andrew Davenport could be reached for
`comment, and BQ6 didn't respond to requests for comment.
`
`The U.S. attorney's office in Manhattan, headed by Preet Bharara. is
`investigating possible mail and wire fraud violations, one of people familiar with
`the matter said. The wide-ranging mail and wire-fraud statutes make it illegal to
`use interstate communications as part of a scheme to defraud another out of
`money.
`
`Prosecutors are investigating not only the level of control Valeant exerted over
`Philidor's business, but the extent of the ties, includingValeant's role in
`Philidor's growth, one of the people said.
`
`Valeant told investors in October that "the bulk ofPhilidor's volume is related to
`Valeant products." A lawyer for Philidor the following month referred to Valeant
`North America as its only client.
`
`Industry experts say it is rare for a pharmacy to be controlled by a drugmaker
`and sell a large portfolio of its drugs. Adam Fein with Pembroke Consulting,
`whose focus is drug sales and economics, called the Philidor-Valeant
`relationship "highly unusual."
`
`Valeant has pointed to other drugmakers' use of specialty pharmacies in defense
`ofits Philidor relationship.
`
`Valeant started doing business with Philidor in early 2013 when it struck a sales
`agreement with the startup, according to documents submitted to a U.S. Senate
`committee.
`
`After starting as a pilot project to dispense only a fewValeant drugs, Philidor by
`2015 was selling a portfolio of more than 50 Valeant drugs, according to the April
`2016lawyer's letter to the Senate committee on aging. That year Valeant paid
`Philidor more than $80 million in fees, versus around $17 million the previous
`year, according to Senate committee docwnents.
`
`Philidor's drug distribution service was popular with doctors because it handled
`much of the paperwork involved with seeking reimbursements from insurers.
`
`Valeant and Philidor discussed Valeant purchasing Philidor, according to the
`April lawyer letter and people familiar with the matter. In December 2014,
`Valeant agreed to payPhilidor $100 million plus milestone fees for an option to
`buy the company, with no further money down. The deal, which wasn't initially
`disclosed to Wall Street, led Valeant to consolidate its financial results with
`Philidor.
`
`2 of 3
`
`10/30/2017, 2:39 PM
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`Valeant Under Criminal Investigation - WSJ
`
`https://www.wsj.com/articles/valeant-under-criminal-investigation-1470...
`
`Write to Jacquie McNish at Jacquie.McNish@wsj.com and Christopher M.
`Matthews at christopher.matthews@wsj.com
`
`Appeared in the August 11, 2016, print edition as 'Valeant Faces Criminal Probe.'
`
`Copyright ©2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
`
`This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers visit
`http://www.djreprints.com.
`
`3 of 3
`
`10/30/2017, 2:39 PM
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket