throbber
Paper No. ___
`Filed: August 23, 2017
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`ACRUX DDS PTY LTD. & ACRUX LIMITED
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`KAKEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. and VALEANT
`PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`Patent Owner and Licensee
`
`
`
`Case: IPR2017-00190
`U.S. Patent No. 7,214,506
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION
`FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`OF LISA N. PHILLIPS UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-00190
`Patent No. 7,214,506
`
`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) authorizing motions for pro hac vice
`
`admission of back-up counsel, Petitioners Acrux DDS Pty Ltd. and Acrux Limited
`
`request that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) admit Lisa N.
`
`Phillips, pro hac vice in this proceeding, IPR2017-00190.
`
`II. STATEMENT OF FACTS SHOWING GOOD CAUSE FOR THE
`BOARD TO RECOGNIZE BACK-UP COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE
`DURING THE PROCEEDING
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel
`
`pro hac vice subject to the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner
`
`and to any other conditions that the Board may impose. Section 42.10(c) provides,
`
`inter alia, that “where the lead counsel is a registered practitioner, a motion to
`
`appear pro hac vice by counsel who is not a registered practitioner may be granted
`
`upon showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an
`
`established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.” 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c). See also, Unified Patents v. Parallel Iron, IPR2013-00639,
`
`Paper 7 (Oct. 15, 2013). The following facts establish good cause for the Board to
`
`recognize Lisa N. Phillips, pro hac vice in this proceeding:
`
`1. As a Partner with Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., Ms.
`
`Phillips is an experienced litigator with extensive experience in pharmaceutical
`
`patent litigation and with issues related to pharmaceutical matters. Phillips Decl.,
`

`
`2 
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-00190
`Patent No. 7,214,506
`
`¶¶ 1, 10. Ms. Phillips is a member in good standing of the Pennsylvania and
`
`District of Columbia Bars. Id. at ¶¶ 2-3. Ms. Phillips has not applied to appear pro
`
`hac vice before any other Board or United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`(“USPTO”) proceeding over the last three years. Id. at ¶6.  
`
`2. Ms. Phillips has become familiar with the issues associated with U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,214,506 (“the ’506 patent”) in this proceeding. Phillips Decl., ¶ 11.
`
`She has reviewed the patent, its prosecution history, and the prior art, including the
`
`asserted references. Id. In addition, she worked closely with Petitioners’ Counsel
`
`of Record to draft and finalize the Petition and assisted with the preparation of Dr.
`
`Walters’ expert declaration in support of the Petition. Id. She has also reviewed
`
`and is familiar with the other documents filed in this proceeding. Id. She has
`
`knowledge of the technical issues that are relevant to this proceeding. Id.
`
`3.
`
`Petitioners’ lead counsel, Mr. E. Anthony Figg, is a registered
`
`practitioner and Ms. Phillips is an experienced litigation attorney having
`
`established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. Phillips
`
`Decl., ¶¶ 10-11. Petitioners wish to apply Ms. Phillips’ experience with
`
`pharmaceutical matters, generally, and her knowledge of the technical issues
`
`associated with the ’506 patent, specifically, in this proceeding. Therefore,
`
`Petitioners respectfully submit there is good cause for the Board to recognize Ms.
`
`Phillips as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`

`
`3 
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-00190
`Patent No. 7,214,506
`
`4. Ms. Phillips has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42
`
`of 37 C.F.R. Phillips Decl., ¶ 8. Ms. Phillips agrees to be subject to the USPTO
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and to be subject to the
`
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct as set forth in Changes to Representation of
`
`Others Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Final Rule, 78 Fed.
`
`Reg. 20180 (Apr. 3, 2013) (effective May 3, 2013). Id. at ¶ 9.
`
`5.
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is supported by the attached
`
`Declaration of Ms. Phillips.
`
`6. Counsel for Patent Owner does not oppose Ms. Phillips appearing pro
`
`hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioners respectfully request the Board admit
`
`Lisa N. Phillips as pro hac vice counsel in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Date: August 23, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Aydin H. Harston/
`E. Anthony Figg, Reg. No. 27,195
`Aydin H. Harston, Reg. No. 65,249
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
`607 14th St., N.W., Suite 800
`

`
`4 
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-00190
`Patent No. 7,214,506
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-783-6040
`Fax: 202-783-6031
`
`Counsel for Petitioners
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-00190
`Patent No. 7,214,506
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing UNOPPOSED
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF LISA N. PHILLIPS
`
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) was served electronically via email on August 23,
`
`2017, in its entirety on the following:
`
`John D. Livingstone
`john.livingstone@finnegan.com
`KakenIPR@finnegan.com
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`271 17th Street, NW, Suite 1400
`Atlanta, GA 30363-6209
`
`Naoki Yoshida
`naoki.yoshida@finnegan.com
`Anthony Hartman
`anthony.hartmann@finnegan.com
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`901 New York Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`
`Toan P. Vo
`toan.vo@bausch.com
`Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC
`1400 N. Goodman Street
`Rochester, New York 14609
`
`By: /Aydin H. Harston/
`E. Anthony Figg, Reg. No. 27,195
`Aydin H. Harston, Reg. No. 65,249
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
`607 14th St., N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-783-6040 Fax: 202-783-6031
`Counsel for Petitioners
`

`
`6 
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket