throbber
8/1/2017
`
`Ask Well: Leaving Nail Fungus Untreated - The New York Times
`
`31):: New flork fiimes
`
`Ask Well: Leaving Nail Fungus Untreated
`
`By Anahad O'Connor October 11, 2013 12:01 am
`
`Q I
`
`s there any health risk to allowing a toenail fungus to exist
`untreated over the long term?
`I have avoided using oral drugs for chronic toenail fungus because I don't want to risk
`liver damage. Which raises the question: Is there any health risk to allowing a toenail
`fungus to exist untreated over the long term? Thanks!
`
`Reader Question - 2645 votes
`
`A
`
`Fungal infections of the nail can be difficult to treat. As a previous Ask Well
`
`column noted, plenty of remedies exist, but none are certain. And the one considered
`
`most effective, the drug Lamisil, is associated with rare cases of liver damage.
`
`So it is no surprise that some people would consider covering up their feet and
`
`turning a blind eye to the problem. Most healthy young adults who ignore it will
`
`probably not notice any immediate issues. But over time, as the fungus progresses
`
`from the tip of the nail toward the cuticle, it can make the nail thick, discolored and
`
`brittle, and pain and inflammation become more likely.
`
`In about one out of two dozen cases, the fungus migrates to other parts of the
`
`body, like the hands, back and legs, said Dr. Boni E. Elewski, a professor of
`
`dermatology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham who specializes in nail
`
`disorders. Older people or those taking medications that weaken the immune
`
`system, like chemotherapy drugs and corticosteroids, are particularly susceptible.
`
`“If you don’t treat it, you have an organism living in your nail that could
`
`spread,” she said. “In most people, it probably won’t go beyond the foot. But there
`
`are some people who are at risk of getting it in the fingernails and other places.”
`
`httpszllwell.blogs.nytimes.coml2013/10/11lask-weII-Ieaving-naiI-fungus-untreated/
`
`1/2
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`Kaken Exhibit 20 80
`
`Acrux V. Kaken
`
`IPR2017-00190
`
`

`

`8/1/2017
`
`Ask Well: Leaving Nail Fungus Untreated - The New York Times
`
`The other problem with ignoring nail fungus is that the fungus creates cracks
`
`and openings in the skin where bacteria can sneak in and cause infections. For
`
`people who have nerve damage and poor circulation -- someone with diabetic
`
`neuropathy, for example -- this can have serious consequences.
`
`“Podiatrists frequently cite this as a cause of diabetic amputations,” Dr. Elewski
`
`said. “The fungus paves the way for bacteria, and it can definitely be a problem.”
`
`If the side effects of Lamisil are your concern, Dr. Elewski said, then alternatives
`
`are on the horizon. Two promising new topical treatments —- Efinaconazole and
`
`Tavaborole -- are expected to be released next year. Nail lacquers can also be
`
`effective but require regular application. And it is better to begin treatment early.
`
`“The longer you wait,” Dr. Elewski said, “the harder it is to treat.”
`
`Do you have a health question? Submit your question to Ask Well.
`
`A version of this article appears in print on 10/15/2013, on page D6 of the NewYork
`edition with the headline: Leaving Nail Fungus Untreated.
`
`© 2017 The New York Times Company
`
`httpszllwell.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/11lask-weII-Ieaving-naiI-fungus-untreated/
`
`2/2
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket