throbber
KRF043B-1
`Laboratory, Main office/Team leader, theme leader
`
`Research and Development Activity Report
`May 28, 1999
`Hisato Senda, Pharmacology Research Division, (seal) Senda
`
`Theme name (code number): KP-103 (062A0)
`Term: April 1999 to May 1999
`Responsible parties (energy allocation): Yoshiyuki Tatsumi (30%), Mamoru Yokoo (30%)
`
`Progress status (results, problems):
`1) Establishment of guinea pig onychomycosis model and treatment efficacy of KP-103 (End)
`
`After licensing KP-103 to Pola Chemical Industries, it is necessary to acquire a use patent for
`onychomycosis, in order to extend the term of the contract and authorize onychomycosis indication. Until
`now, the onychomycosis model was not established in any research term, so this time, establishment of the
`onychomycosis model for guinea pigs was tested using T. mentagrophytes SM-110 strain, for which
`infection in toenails is already confirmed, and the efficacy of KP-103 was investigated. The efficacy on
`onychomycosis was evaluated with a new method that we devised because evaluation was not possible with
`existing methods.
`
`Group
`
`Base control
`KP-103
`Lanoconazole
`Terbinafine
`Base control
`KP-103
`Lanoconazole
`Terbinafine
`
`Treatment frequency
`
`15
`15
`15
`15
`20
`20
`20
`20
`
`Fungus-negative
`toenails
`0/10
`0/10
`0/10
`1/10
`0/10
`3/10
`0/10
`1/10
`
`Average number of
`fungi in nails (Log CFU
`± SD/foot)
`3.00 ± 0.54
`2.86 ± 0.67
`2.23 ± 0.31
`2.25 ± 0.83
`3.23 ± 0.74
`1.82 ± 0.91 a
`2.70 ± 0.63
`2.03 ± 0.75
`
`a P < 0.05 vs base control
`
`Although with the 15-time application treatment all of the drugs exhibited a decline in number of
`fungi in the nail, a significant fungus elimination efficacy was not confirmed. When KP-103 was applied
`20 times, the number of fungi in the nail significantly declined, and complete curing was confirmed in the
`nails of 3 of 10 feet. On the other hand, a significant fungus elimination efficacy was not confirmed with 20
`applications of lanoconazole or terbinafine. Because existing topical agents have poor penetration into the
`nail plate and do not exhibit efficacy, for onychomycosis, oral treatments with terbinafine and itraconazole
`were done. From these results, it is suggested that KP-103 is effective against onychomycosis in local
`administration. It is conjectured that because KP-103 as low affinity with keratin, it exhibited good
`penetration in the nail plate and demonstrated excellent efficacy.
`This time, the world's first in vivo evaluation system for onychomycosis was established,
`suggesting extreme intractability in correlation with onychomycosis in humans. This method is extremely
`useful as a drug efficacy evaluation method for onychomycosis.
`
`2) Conference presentations and paper preparation
`
`Abstract submitted to the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
`
`

`

`Preparing paper for submission.
`
`Changes in plans, timing forecast, issues:
`
`1) Confirming consistency with raw data for efficacy tests with an eye on publishing a report after
`the current agreement in August.
`
`2) Based on these results, we will investigate plans for acquiring a use patent for KP-103 on nails,
`with the Intellectual Property Division.
`
`Items of special note:
`
`Affiliated chief's comments:
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket