throbber
.I(o)l7I2.'\}~\L OF
`
`
`i’ harmaoy and
`Pharmacology
`
`
`
`
`
`n y.
`
`002243573‘
`
`JUN 0 71999
`
`HE.0LTf-4 SCJENCES L!EP.AR!ES
`
`
`;i>.’%
`I}
`:7 .
`
`1'“ Vial" H
`
`
`;~’.-~~‘:-Hygx 3..
`"($2-"
`
`
`
`,
`_
`_
`_
`Royal Pharmaceutical Soclety of Great Brltam
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 10
`
`Kaken Exhibit 2014
`Au.“ “Kaken
`IPR20l7-00190
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
`
`Published by The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`l Larnbeth High Street. London SE] TJN Telephone 0l7l~735 9141
`FAX DITI-320 3917
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`E-Mai] jpp@rpsgb.org.u.k
`http:!."dspace.diaJ.pipex.comfjpp.F
`
`
`
`Editorial Oifice for Japan: Department of Pliannaceutics. Kanazawa University. Takara-machi I3-l, Kanazawa 920
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EDITOR Dal CHAMBERLAIN
`
`
`
`
`
`ASSISTANT EDITOR DR A L SUGDEN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EDITORIAL ASSISTANT G M MCMAHON
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EDITORIAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`ASSOCIATE EDITOR {JAPAN}
`
`
`
`
`
`PROFESSOR A TSUJI
`
`
`
`
`
`K L Auous, Lawrence, Kansas
`
`
`
`
`
`L L AUGSBURGER, Baltimore, Maryland
`
`
`
`
`B W BARRY, Bradford
`
`
`
`
`E J BEJAR, San Diego. California
`
`
`
`
`
`E BEUBLER, Graz, Austria
`
`
`
`
`N BODOR, Gainesville, Florida
`
`
`
`
`D D BREIMER, Leiden, The Netherlands
`
`
`
`
`
`D J BURGESS, Storrs, Connecticutt
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Y W CHIEN, Piscataway. New Jersey
`
`
`
`
`D A COWAN, London
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`S P DENYER (Chairman), Brighton
`F J EVANS, London
`
`
`
`
`J J FERRARA, New Orleans, Louisiana
`
`
`
`
`
`J L FORD, Liverpool
`
`
`
`
`D R FRIEND, Menlo Park, California
`
`
`
`
`
`D GANDERTDN, London
`
`
`E P GOLDBERG. Gainesville, Florida
`
`
`
`
`
`D J GREENBLATT, Boston, Massachusetts
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`M J GROVES, Chicago, Illinois
`R H GUY, Archarnps, France
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A HOLT. Edmonton, Alberta
`
`
`
`P G JENNER, London
`
`
`
`
`I W KELLAWAY, Cardiff‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`W E LINDUP, Liverpool
`H I MAIBACH, San Francisco, California
`
`
`
`
`
`T MANDAL, New Orleans, Louisiana
`
`
`
`
`
`R J NAYLOR, Bradford
`
`
`
`
`S DIE, San Francisco, California
`
`
`
`
`.1 W PHILLIS, Detroit, Michigan
`
`
`
`
`
`K D RAINSFORD, Sheffield
`
`
`
`
`W R RAVIS, Auburn, Alabama
`
`
`
`
`
`J E RJVIERE, Raleigh, North Carolina
`
`
`
`
`
`J R Roamson, Madison, Wisconsin
`
`
`
`
`
`A ROLLAND, The Woodlands, Texas
`
`
`
`
`
`H H TAI, Lexington, Kentucky
`
`
`
`
`
`B TESTA. Lausanne, Switzerland
`
`
`
`
`E TOMLINSON, The Woodlands, Texas
`
`
`
`
`B WIDDOP, London
`
`
`
`D E WURSTER, Iowa City, Iowa
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COPYRIGHT i_'.- 1999 Journal ofPharmac_1' and Phannacologjr.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by the Journal of Phannacy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and Pharmacology for libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service. provided that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the base fee of $15 per article is paid directly to CCC, 21 Congress St. Salem, MA D1970. USA.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CODE: 0022-35'.l3/90.
`
`
`Annual joint subscriptions H999) to Journal of Phannacy and Phannacology and Pharmacy and Pharmacology Communications: UK £450; Europe
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`£470: America and Japan $790; rest of world £490. Single issues: UK £30; Europe and rest of world £35: America and Japan $56.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`All orders should he sent to: The Pharmaceutical Press. PO Box 15!, Wallingford. Oxon (JXIO SQU. UK. Telephone +44 {D}l49l S19 2'f2; FAX +44
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(0)1491 829 292: E-Mail rpsgb@cahi.org
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims for missing copies cannot be considered unless received within three months of publication.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 10
`
`Page 2 of 10
`
`

`

`Phann. Pharmacol. I999. 5|: 27l-278
`lneeived August 25. 1998
`Amepted November 2. I998
`
`.1’
`
`I999 J. Phann. Pharmacol.
`
`Drug Permeation through the Three Layers of the
`Human Nail Plate
`
`YOICHI KOBAYASHI. MISAO MlYAMOTO*. KENJI SUGIBAYASHI
`AND YASUNORI MORIMOTO
`
`Faculty of Phamtaceutical Sciences, Josai University. [-1 Keyakidai, Sakado, Saitama 350-0295 and
`*Nissan Chemical Co., Ltd, 3-7-1 Kanda-Nishiki-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0054, Japan
`
`Abstract
`
`The in-vitro permeation characteristics of a water soluble model drug, 5-fiuorouraeil, and a
`poorly water soluble model drug, flurbiprofen, were investigated through three layers of the
`human nail plate (namely, the dorsal, intermediate and ventral nail plates), using a modified
`side-by-side diffusion cell. The dorsal-filed nail plate, the ventral-filed nail plate and the
`dorsal-and-ventral-filed nail plate were prepared to known thicknesses and then used with
`the full-thickness nail plate to investigate the penneation characteristics of each single
`layer.
`Most of the lipids in the human nail plate were found in the dorsal and ventral layers.
`The rank orders of the penneation fluxes for 5-fluorouraeil and flurbiprofen were both:
`dorsal-and-ventral—fi|ed nail plate > dorsal-filed nail plate > ventral-filed nail plate > full-
`thickness nail plate. With respect to 5-fluorouracil permeation through each single layer,
`the permeability coefficient of the intemiediate layer was higher than those of other single
`layers. However in the case of flurbiprofen, the permeability coefficient of the ventral layer
`was higher than other single layers. The diffusion coefficients of 5—fluorouracil and
`flurbiprofen in the dorsal layer were the lowest of any single layer. The drug concentration
`in each layer was estimated using each respective permeation parameter. The drug
`concentration in the nail plate was observed to be dependent on the solubility and the
`flux of the drug.
`From these findings, we suggest that the human nail plate behaves like a hydrophilic gel
`membrane rather than a lipophilic partition membrane and that the upper layer functions as
`the main nail barrier to drug permeation through its low diffusivity against the drugs.
`
`Although the human nail plate is generally con-
`sidered to be composed of either one layer or three
`layers,
`the
`three-layer model
`is more widely
`accepted (Spearman 1978; Dawber 1980). The
`upper,
`the middle and the lower layers of the
`human nail plate are called the dorsal. intermediate
`and ventral nail plates, respectively (Figure I). In
`addition, the tissue under the nail plate, called the
`nail bed, consists of viable epidennis. Information
`regarding the distribution of fungi
`in the human
`nail plate is required for the treatment of onycho-
`mycosis trichophytica. It has been reported that the
`dorsal nail plate,
`the ventral nail plate,
`the sub-
`ungual keratin and the eponychium are infected by
`fungi such as Trichophyton rubrum and Tricho-
`
`Correspondence: Y. Morimoto. Faculty of Pharmaceutical
`Sciences. Josai University.
`l-l Keyakidai. Sakado, Saitama
`350-0295, Japan.
`
`phyton mentagrophytes (Sagher 1948; Jillson &
`Piper 1957; Akiba 1971). Of these nail compo-
`nents, it is the ventral nail plate and the subungual
`keratin that are found to be infected in most cases.
`
`it is of great importance to understand
`Therefore,
`the specific properties of each layer in the human
`nail plate.
`Onychomycosis trichophytica has been treated
`mainly with oral antifungal medication (Piepponen
`et al 1992; Villars & Jones 1992). With systemic
`treatment, an antifungal drug may be delivered
`from the blood in the dermis under the nail bed and
`
`the nail matrix to the ventral nail plate and sub-
`ungual keratin (Matthieu et al 1991). On the other
`hand, antifungal drugs are not delivered to the
`ventral nail plate and the subungual keratin fol-
`lowing topical treatment because of low nail-plate
`permeability. Each layer has unique physical
`
`Page 3 of 10
`
`

`

`
`
`\TNCHlKUBAYASHlETAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`E
`
`h"
`Dome mm
`
`
`
`Dorsal nail plate
`Intermediate nail plate

`\
`
`Ventral nail plate
`
`Figure 1.
`
`
`
`
`Schematic diagram of the human nail plate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Preparatiwr ofnai! plates
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tip nail pieces were obtained from the fingers of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`healthy volunteers using nail clippers. A lot of nail
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pieces, clipped from the same volunteer
`(male.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aged 24 years) were used in the permeation study
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and for microscopic observation. Forty nail pieces
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`obtained from other healthy volunteers (10 males,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mean age 24 years} were used in the measurement
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of total lipid. The thicknesses of nail pieces were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`measured with a micrometer
`l_Mitutoyo Corp,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Japan) equipped with pointed metal attachments.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The thickness ratio of each layer of the human nail
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plate (dorsal:intermediate:ventral) was assessed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to be 3 :5 : 2 after examining several reports (Jillson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`& Piper 1957; Spearman l978; Stijttgen 8:’ Bauer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1982). The dorsal-filed nail plate, the ventral—filed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nail plate and the dorsal- and ventral-filed nail plate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`were prepared to known thicknesses with sand
`
`paper
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Deternrirrarrbrr ofsrrlubiliries and nail plate/tieltide
`
`
`
`
`partition r'0ejfic'ienIs qf drugs
`
`
`
`
`5-Fluorouracil and flurbiprofen aqueous suspen-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sions were mixed with a magnetic stirrer at 37°C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`After 24 h, each suspension was subjected to fil-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tration (Ekicrodisc 3: German Sciences Japan, Ltd,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tokyo). The filtrate was immediately diluted with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`distilled water or methanol to obtain samples for
`
`analysis.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The finger nail pieces (full-thickness nail plate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ventral-filed nail plate, dorsal-filed nail plate and
`
`
`
`
`
`dorsal-and-ventral-filed
`plate) were
`the
`nail
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weighed with an electronic balance (IL-200, Chyo
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Balance Corp.). They were immersed in half-con-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`centration solutions (lmL) of 5-fluorouracil or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`flurbiprofen solubility at 37°C for 48 h. After
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`removal of the nail piece from each solution. the
`concentration of the solution was measured. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the nail pieces were extracted with
`drugs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`methanol (l0mL) three times. The extracted sol-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vent was evaporated under nitrogen gas at 60"C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subsequently,
`1 ml. of distilled water or methanol
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`was added to obtain samples for analysis. We
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`assumed that
`the weight (volume) ratio of each
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`layer of the nail plate was 3:5:2. The apparent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`partition coefficient of the drugs was calculated as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the concentration ratio in the nail plate/ vehicle at
`37°C.
`
`
`Permeation studies
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To overcome large variations in nail permeabilities
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`due to individual differences in barrier properties,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nail pieces (20-35 mg) from the third finger and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the fifth finger of the same volunteer were used in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`therefore,
`and,
`properties
`drug perrneabilities
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`through each layer may be different. Only a few in-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vitro drug permeation studies have been performed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`on the human nail plate. Merlin & Lippold (l99?a)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reported that the human nail plate and the keratin
`
`
`
`
`
`
`membrane from bovine hooves (the model mem-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the human nail plate). behave like
`brane of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrophilic gel membranes. Walters et al (1983,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1985) also suggested that
`the human nail plate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`behaves like a hydrophilic gel membrane. Fur-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thermore, they suggested that it has an additional
`
`
`
`
`lipophilic route for permeation.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the present study, the distribution of lipids in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the human nail plate was examined in detail. In
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`order to investigate the nail penneability of a water
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`soluble model drug, 5-fluorouracil, and a poorly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`soluble model drug, flurbiprofen, a modified side-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by-side diffusion cell was used. The drug permea-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion characteristics of each single layer were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`investigated by filing upper or lower layers, or both,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the human nail plate. 5-Fluorottracil and flurbi-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`profen perrneations, from the ventral to the dorsal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nail plate, were compared with those from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dorsal to the ventral nail plate. The amounts of 5-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fluorouracil and fiurbiprofen in the nail plate were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`also compared with those calculated from the per-
`
`
`
`
`
`meation parameters of each drug.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`
`
`Materials
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5-Fluorouracil was obtained from Tokyo Kasei
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Kogyo Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan). Flurbiprofen was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`supplied by Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (Chiba,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Japan). Triolein (practical grade), cholesterol and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vaniline (for measuring total
`lipid) and Sudan
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Black B (for lipid staining) were purchased from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Wako Pure Chemical
`Industries, Ltd (Osaka,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Japan). Other reagents were obtained from com-
`mercial sources.
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 10
`
`Page 4 of 10
`
`

`

`DRUG PERMEATION THROUGH HUMAN NAIL PLATE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`273
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the permeation studies of 5-fluorouracil and flur-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`biprofen, respectively. The full-thickness nail plate,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the dorsal-filed nail plate, the ventral—filed nail plate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and the dorsal-and-ventral~filed nail plate were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sandwiched between 2 adapters made of poly-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`propylene with an O-shaped ring (effective diffu-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sion area, 0-O49 cm2) and mounted in a side-by-side
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`diffusion cell
`(2-5 mL or 1-5 mL) with a water
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`jacket connected to a water bath at 37°C. 5-Fluor-
`
`
`
`
`
`ouracil- or flurbiprofen-suspension was applied to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the dorsal nail plate side of the diffusion cell, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the ventral nail side was filled with distilled water
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`or 40% polyethylene glycol 400 (to maintain the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sink condition). In the case of vehicle application to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the ventral nail plate side, 5-fluorouracil- or flur-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`biprofen-suspension was placed in the ventral nail
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plate side compartment, and the dorsal nail plate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`side was filled with distilled water or 40% poly-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ethylene glycol 400. No preservative was added
`because the receiver solution was clear even at the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`end of the experiment. The permeation was mea-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sured by sampling the receiver side solution at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`predetermined times. The experimental period was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘i’ days (5-fluorouracil) or 19 days (flurbiprofen)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`because of the low nail permeability of drugs.
`
`
`
`
`
`Measurement of total lipid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Total lipid was measured according to the method
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of Knight et al (1972). After nail pieces from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fingers of healthy volunteers were prepared into
`
`
`
`
`full-thickness, ventral-filed, dorsal-filed and dorsal-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and-ventral-filed layers, they were immersed in a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`chloroform—methanol (3: l) mixture for 24h to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`extract lipids. The extracted solvent was evaporated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`under nitrogen gas at 50°C. Sulphuric acid (300 pl.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`was added to the sample and heated in boiling
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Water for 5 min. After cooling to room temperature,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2mL of phosphovaniline test solution (06% w/v
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aqueous vaniline solution/phosphoric acid; 1:4)
`was added and the mixture was incubated for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15min at 37°C. Then,
`the absorbance was mea-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sured at 535nm using a spectrophotometer (UV-
`
`
`
`
`
`IGOA, Shimadzu Seisakusho, Kyoto, Japan). A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mixture of cholesterol and triolein (3 : 1) was used
`as a reference standard.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Observation of iipid dimibution
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`finger of a healthy
`A nail piece from the first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`volunteer was used to observe nail plate lipid dis-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tribution. After the nail plate was frozen in an
`
`
`
`
`embedding medium (Tissue-Tek; Sakura Fine-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`technical Co., Ltd, Tokyo),
`it was sliced with a
`
`
`
`
`
`microtome (IBC Model Minotome Microtome
`
`
`
`
`
`International Equipment Company). A
`Cryostat:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`section of this nail plate was stained with Sudan
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Black B in isopropyl alcohol
`(5 mgmL_') for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`30 min. After being washed with 50% methanol for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`about 303,
`it was observed under a microscope
`
`
`
`
`
`(New VANOX. Olympus, Tokyo).
`
`
`
`Analytical method
`
`
`
`
`
`5-Fluorouracil and flurbiprofen levels were deter-
`
`
`
`
`
`mined by high-performance liquid chromatography
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(HPLC). Sample solutions were injected into the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HPLC instrument. which was composed of a pump
`
`
`
`
`
`system (LC-10A, Shimadzu Seisakusho, Kyoto,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Japan), a UV detector (SPD-IOA, Shimadzu), a
`
`
`
`
`
`fluorescence detector (RF-IOAXL, Shimadzu), a
`
`
`
`
`
`Chromatopack (C-RSA. Shimadzu), a system con-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(SCL-IOA, Shimadzu), an auto injector
`troller
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(SIL-10A, Shimadzu) and a reverse phase column
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Inertsil ODS 250 mmx-4-6 mm i.d., GL Sciences
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ine.. Tokyo). The mobile phase for flurbiprofen was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`01% phosphoric acid/acetonitrile (40:60),
`the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`flow rate was 1 mLn1in' 1 and fluorescence detec-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion was conducted at an excitation wavelength of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`260nm and an emission wavelength of 313 nm.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The mobile phase for 5-fluorouracil was 0-1%
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`phosphoric acid acetonitrile (98:2), the flow rate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`was 1 mL min‘ , and UV detection was conducted
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at a wavelength of 270 nm.
`
`
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lipid distribution in the nail plate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The lipid content in the human nail plate was found
`to be much lower than that in the stratum corneum
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of skin (Walters & Flynn 1983). However, various
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lipids such as long-chain fatty acids,
`free fats,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cholesterol, squalene and phospholipids are present
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the human nail plate (Spearman 1978; Hirose et
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`al 1990). It is thought that the lipid distribution and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentration in the human nail plate may affect
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the drug permeation, particularly the partition of
`
`
`
`
`drugs into the membrane.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Table l shows the total-lipid concentration (CL)
`
`
`
`
`in the ventral-filed, dorsal-filed, dorsal-and-ventral-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`filed and full—thickness layers. The ventral-filed and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dorsal—filed layers had a high total-lipid con-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`centration; about l-5 and 3-0 times those observed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the dorsal-and-ventral-filed layer. The total-lipid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`concentrations of each single layer were calculated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from the experimental data of the ventral-filed,
`
`
`
`
`dorsal—filed
`and dorsal-and-ventral-filed
`layers
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Table 1). The total-lipid concentration in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ventral
`layer was the highest
`in the human nail
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plate. In contrast, the intermediate layer had a low
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 10
`
`Page 5 of 10
`
`

`

`274
`
`YOICHI KOBAYASHI ET AL
`
`Table l. Experiniental (a) and calculated lipid (b) concentration in the nail plate.
`
`Experimental Layer
`(thickness ratio)
`
`CL (fig mg l)
`
`Calculated Layer
`(thickness ratio)
`
`c._ (pg mg ‘ ')
`
`Ventral-tiled
`(3:5)
`
`4-33:‘..:U-45
`
`Dorsal
`(3)
`
`6-82
`
`Dorsal-filed
`(5:2)
`
`8~7():t l~l5
`
`lntennediatc
`(5)
`
`2-83
`
`Dorsal-and-ventral-filed
`(5)
`
`2-83:l:0-28
`
`Ventral
`(2)
`
`236
`
`I
`
`Full-thickness
`(3 15:2)
`
`7-5811-Z0
`
`Full-thickness
`(3 :5: 2)
`
`850
`
`CL: total lipid concentration. Each value in Table 1 represents the meanis.e.m. (n : IO).
`
`total—lipid concentration. The rank order of the total
`lipid concentration in each single layer was ventral
`layer > dorsal layer > intemtediate layer. The total
`lipid concentration in the full-thickness nail plate
`(Table l) was calculated using those of each single
`layer. This lipid concentration was very similar to
`the value for the full-thickness nail plate obtained
`from the experiment.
`Figure 2 shows a micrograph of a human nail
`plate cross section. The lipids in the nail plate were
`stained with Sudan Black B. Sudan Black B can
`
`lipids. such as neutral fats and phos-
`stain most
`pholipids. Most lipids were observed in the upper
`and lower parts of the human nail plate. Moreover.
`uneven pans of the ventral side contained a lot of
`lipids. whereas no lipids were observed in the
`intemiediate part of the nail plate.
`From these results. we suggest that the dorsal and
`ventral layers in the human nail plate contain some
`lipids. whereas the intermediate layer, which is the
`main nail body of the human nail plate, contains
`few lipids.
`
`
`
`Figure 2.
`Micrograph of a human nail plate. D: dorsal nail
`plate side. V: ventral nail plate side. This nail plate section was
`stained with Sudan Black B.
`
`Permeation parameters of each layer
`The data analysis is based on Fick‘s first law:
`
`dQ/dt = DmAC/h
`
`(l)
`
`where dQ/dt is the steady state permeation rate. D",
`is the diffusion coefficient of the drug in the
`membrane. AC is the concentration differential of
`
`the drug in the membrane, and h is the membrane
`thickness.
`ln the case of a sink condition. AC in
`
`Equation I can be replaced with the product of the
`solubility of the drug in the donor solvent (CV) and
`the membrane/donor vehicle partition coefficient
`of the drug (Km):
`
`dQ/dt = DmKmCV/h
`
`The pemteability coefficient of the drug (P)
`given by:
`
`P = DmKm/h
`
`(2)
`
`is
`
`(3)
`
`Figure 3 shows the permeation profiles of 5-fluor-
`ouracil and flurbiprofen through the ventral-tiled,
`dorsal-tiled.
`dorsal-and-ventral-tiled
`and
`full-
`
`layers. The rank orders for the 5-
`thickness nail
`fluorouracil and fiurbiprofen fluxes were both:
`dorsal-and-ventral-filed layer > dorsal-tiled layer >
`ventral—filed layer>full-thickness layer. The lag
`times for 5-fiuorouracil and fiurbiprofen permea-
`tions through full-thickness nail plates were about
`2-5 and 11 days, respectively. Mertin & Lippold
`(l997a) also suggested that steady-state perrnea—
`tions of nicotinic acid esters through human nail
`plates were obtained after
`l0—80h.
`In addition,
`they reported that
`steady-state permeation of
`chloramphenicol, from an aqueous suspension or a
`nail lacquer. through the human nail plate occurred
`after a lag time of 200h and 400 h, respectively
`(Mertin & Lippold 1997b).
`Table 2 shows the 5-fluorouracil and fiurbiprofen
`pemteation parameters of the ventral-filed. dorsal-
`filed, dorsal-and-ventral-filed and full-thickness
`
`nail layers. The apparent pemieability cocfficicnts
`of each drug through these nail plates were calcu-
`
`Page 6 of 10
`
`

`

`DRUG PERMEATION THROUGH HUMAN NAIL PLATE
`
`as§
`
`
`
`
`
`5-fluorouracilpermeated(ygcm‘2)
`
`
`
`
`
`Flurbiprofenpermeated(pgcm‘2)
`
`_. N O
`
`6o
`
`O)O
`
`N4:.onooo
`
`4
`
`Time (days)
`
`10
`
`1 5
`
`Time (days)
`
`Figure 3.
`Pcmication profiles of 5-fluorouracil (a) and flurbiprofcn (b) through ventral-filed (A). dorsal—filcd (U). dorsal-and
`ventral-filed (O) and full-thickness (C) nail layers. Each value represents the mean:l:s.e.m. (n =3-5).
`
`lated using Equations 2 and 3. In all permeation
`studies. CV values are given in saturated con-
`centrations of 5—fluorouracil (17-lmg mL") and
`flurbiprofen (27-7;tg mL' ')
`at
`37“C. because
`donor vehicles are aqueous suspensions. Although
`the ventral-filed nail layer had approximately the
`same 5-fluorouracil permeability coefficient as the
`dorsal-filed layer, the dorsal-and-ventral-filed layer
`had a higher permeability coefficient
`than those
`layers. On the other hand. the flurbiprofen penne-
`ability coefficient of the dorsal-and-ventral-filed
`layer was also higher than those of the ventral-filed
`and dorsal-filed layers. The nail plate/vehicle par-
`tition coefficients of each drug were calculated as
`concentration ratios in the ventral-filed, dorsal-
`filed, dorsal-and-ventral-filed and full-thickness
`layers/water at 37"C, respectively. The nail plate/
`vehicle partition coefficients of 5-fluorouracil and
`flurbiprofen were not very different between the
`ventral-filed. dorsal-filed and dorsal-and-ventraL
`
`filed layers. The diffusion coefficients of each drug
`in the_ ventral-filed, dorsal-filed. dorsal-and-ventrah
`filed and full-thickness nail layers were calculated
`using Equation 3. The diffusion coefficients of 5-
`fluorouracil and fiurbiprofen in the ventral-filed
`layer were lower than those in the dorsal-filed and
`dorsal-and-ventral-filed layers.
`
`The permeation parameters of each single layer
`(dorsal,
`intermediate or ventral) were computed
`using those of the ventral-filed, dorsal-filed and
`dorsal-and-ventral-filed layers. Flynn et al (1974)
`proposed that the diffusional resistance. R,.
`in the
`ith layer can be defined by:
`
`R=1/P;=h;/(D;K.)
`
`(4)
`
`In multiple layers. the total diffusional resistance
`(RT) may be computed by:
`
`R1" = 1/Pr = hi/(DIKI) + hz/lD2K:)
`
`(5)
`
`+...'l-ll"/(DnKn')
`
`Table 3 shows the permeation parameters of 5-
`fluorouracil and flurbiprofen for each single nail
`layer. The pemieability coefficient of each single
`layer was calculated using Equation 5. For 5-
`fiuorouracil,
`the intermediate layer had a high
`penneability coefficient compared with the other
`single layers.
`In contrast, the ventral
`layer had a
`high permeability coefficient for flurbiprofen. The
`permeability coefficients for 5-fluorouracil and
`flurbiprofen through the dorsal layer were low. The
`nail plate/vehicle partition coefficients of the drugs
`for each single layer were calculated using those
`of the ventral-filed. dorsal-filed and dorsal-and-
`
`Page 7 of 10
`
`

`

`276
`
`
`Table 2.
`
`
`
`Permeation parameters of 5-fluorouracil and fiurbiprofen through the human nail plate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`YOICHI KOBAYASHI ET AL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Drug Parameter
`
`
`
`Layer (thickness ratio)
`
`
`
`
`Ventral—filed {3 :5}
`
`
`
`
`Dorsal- filed {S : 2}
`
`
`
`
`Dorsal—and-ventral-filed (5)
`
`
`
`Full—thickness (3 : 5 1 2]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5—Fluorouracil
`h (pm)
`
`
`P (X lU?cms ’ ')
`
`
`
`Km
`1
`
`
`Din {X lO8cm's" ')
`
`
`
`
`Flurbiprofen
`h turn)
`
`
`
`P (xl{l°cms"1'}
`
`
`Km
`3
`
`
`
`
`Elm (x l0"crn‘s‘ ')
`
`
`396.0
`
`2-5! $048
`
`0-53 :1: 0-04
`
`1-87
`
`
`34?-2
`
`1-83 d: 0-] l
`
`l-07:t 0-15
`
`
`5-92
`
`
`346-5
`
`3-07:l:0-22
`
`0-49:l:U-OI
`
`2-18
`
`
`303-8
`
`2-76:l:0-43
`l«l3:t0«24
`742
`
`
`
`
`
`2475
`
`7- l 2 :l: 0-65
`0-56 :I: 0-02
`3- l3
`
`
`
`
`
`217-0
`
`3-59:t 1-28
`
`
`0-98:t0«22
`
`796
`
`
`495-l}
`
`1-49i{l-2'?
`
`O-S4-4.-.0-06
`
`1-3?
`
`
`434-0
`
`l-45 i 0-54
`
`l-47 i 032
`
`4-29
`
`
`
`Each value represents the mean :E s.e.m. (n = 3—-5). Apparent penrteability coefficients were calculated using Equations 2 and 3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`h is the nail membrane thickness; P is the permeability coefficient: Km is the membranefdonor vehicle partition coefficient of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drug; Dm is the diffusion coefficient of the drug in the nail membrane.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ventral-filed nail layers and the weight ratio of each
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`layer {3:5:2). The partition coefficient for 5-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fluorouracil
`in the ventral
`layer was lower than
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`those in the dorsal and intermediate layers. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`rank order of the partition coefficients for S-fiuoro-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`uracil was
`interrnediate layer :» dorsal
`layer >
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ventral layer, whereas the rank order of the flurbi—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`profen partition coefficients was the reverse of this.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In addition, rank orders of these partition coeffi-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cients for each drug are correlated with those of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`total lipid concentrations in the three layers of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`human nail plate. The diffusion coefficients of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drugs in each single layer was calculated using
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Equation 3. The dorsal
`layer had low diffusion
`
`
`
`
`
`coefficients
`for 5-fluorouracil
`and fiurbiprofen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compared with the other single layers. The diffu—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sion coefficients for 5-fluorouracil and fiurbiprofen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the intermediate layer were the highest of those
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for any single layer. The permeation parameters of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the full—thickness nail plate (as shown in Table 3)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`were calculated by substituting those of each single
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`layer, according to Equation 5. They agreed with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the experimental permeation parameters of the full-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thickness nail plates obtained from the permeation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`studies for both drugs (as shown in Table 2).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From these results,
`the drug permeation char-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acteristics of each single layer can be summarized
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`as follows:
`the dorsal layer is characterized by a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`low diffusivity of drugs; the intermediate layer is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`characterized by low lipophilicity; and the ventral
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`layer is characterized by high lipophilicity. We
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`suggest that the main nail barrier to drug pemiea-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tion may be the low diffusivity of drugs in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dorsal layer. The difference between the nail plate/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vehicle partition coefficients for 5-fluorouracil and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`flurbiprofen was small because of the low lipid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the human nail plate. Therefore.
`this
`content
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`suggests that the human nail plate behaves like a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrophilic gel membrane rather than a lipophilic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`partition membrane. This suggestion agrees with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Table 3. Calculated permeation parameters of 5—fluorouracil and flurbiprofen through the human nail plate.
`
`Drug Parameter
`
`
`
`
`Layer (thickness ratio)
`
`
`
`
`Intermediate
`(5)
`
`
`
`
`247-5
`
`T-12
`
`056
`
`3-13
`
`
`217-0
`
`3-59
`
`0-93
`
`7-96
`
`
`Ventral
`{3}
`
`
`
`
`99-0
`
`5-39
`
`0-30
`
`180
`
`
`86-8
`
`1 1-90
`
`1 -5 1
`
`3-42
`
`
`Full—thi-ckness
`(3 :5 : 2)
`
`
`
`
`
`495-0
`
`l-Tl
`
`0-48
`
`I-75
`
`
`434-0
`
`1-58
`
`1- I6
`
`5-9]
`
`
`Dorsal
`( 3)
`
`
`
`
`148-5
`
`3-37
`0-48
`l-2|
`
`
`
`I302
`
`3-21
`1-22
`2-63
`
`
`
`5-Fluorouracil
`h (pm)
`
`
`
`
`P (x 10? cms" '}
`
`Km
`Dm (x1o“cm2.-:' ‘i
`
`Flurbiprofen
`
`h (um)
`
`
`
`P (xIo“cms‘ ')
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Equation
`Each value represents the mean i s.e.m. (n : 3~5}.Perrneability coefficients of each single layer were calculated using
`
`5. h is the nail membrane thickness: P is the permeability coeffieient: Km is the membraneldonor vehicle partition coefficient of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drug; Drn is the diffusion coefficient of the drug in the nail membrane.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 10
`
`Page 8 of 10
`
`

`

`DRUG PERMEATIDN THROUGH HUMAN NAIL PLATE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2??
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`where [CA — CA}, (Cg - CB) and (Cc — Clcl are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the concentration differentials of that drug in each
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`layer {A =dorsal; B‘: intermediate; C : ventral).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In a sink condition. C C can be assumed to be equal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to zero. Therefore, the total amount of a drug (QT)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the full-thickness nail plate can be defined as
`follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(7)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`QT/S ‘—‘ (CA ‘ Cirslhn/2 + (CH ‘ Cialha/2
`
`
`+ Cchc/2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`where S is the surface area of the nail plate. We
`
`
`
`
`
`
`calculated the mean drug concentration in each
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`single layer using Equations 6 and 7.
`Table 4 shows the amounts and mean con-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`centrations of 5-fluorouracil and flurbiprofen in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`each layer,
`as estimated from the permeation
`
`
`
`
`
`parameters. The estimated amount of 5-fluorouracil
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the full-thickness nail plate was similar to the
`
`
`
`
`
`experimental data. The 5-fluorouracil and flurbi-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`profen concentrations in the ventral nail layer that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`resulted from drug permeation data from the ven-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tral nail plate were 4-2 and 45 times higher than
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`those from the dorsal plate. Compared with the
`estimated 5-fluorouracil con

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket