`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. d/b/a ST IMAGING
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`E-IMAGEDATA CORP.
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`CASE: IPR2017-00177
`U.S. PATENT NO. 8,537,279
`_____________________
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF ANTHONY J. SENN
`
`1
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 1 of 45
`
`
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`I, Anthony J. Senn, do hereby declare and say:
`
`I am over the age of twenty-one (21) and competent to make this
`
`declaration. I am also qualified to give testimony under oath. The facts and
`
`opinions listed below are within my personal knowledge.
`
`3.
`
`I am being compensated for my time in this matter at my typical
`
`hourly consulting rate. My compensation in no way depends on the outcome of
`
`this proceeding or the content of my opinions.
`
`4.
`
`I have been asked to review certain documents, including U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,537,279 (which I refer to as the ‘279 Patent) (Ex. 1001), and to provide my
`
`opinions on what those documents disclose. The documents I was asked to review
`
`include those addressed in more detail in the rest of this declaration. I provide my
`
`conclusions regarding the disclosures of these documents below.
`
`5.
`
`I was also asked to provide my opinion on the technical feasibility of
`
`combining certain aspects of certain documents. I have offered my opinion on the
`
`feasibility of these combinations in this declaration.
`
`6.
`
`I am not offering any conclusions as to the ultimate determinations I
`
`understand the Board will make in this proceeding. I am simply providing my
`
`opinion on the technical aspects of the documents (including, where asked, the
`
`application of what I understand Petitioner and/or the Board asserts is the
`
`2
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 2 of 45
`
`
`
`appropriate construction for this proceeding) and on the motivations and
`
`combinability of the concepts disclosed in those documents from a technical
`
`perspective.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`7.
`
`I am a mechanical engineer with over 25 years of experience in
`
`research and development, product design, project management and field
`
`engineering.
`
`8. My experience in these areas spans design of mechanical assemblies
`
`and machinery, materials and manufacturing methods, and 3-D CAD design from
`
`initial concept through final implementation.
`
`9.
`
`As part of my experience, I have managed products from idea to
`
`design to implementation to customer installation, maintenance, and satisfaction. I
`
`have also observed and assisted with the electrical design and controls associated
`
`with automated machinery. I have extensive experience working with and the
`
`design of automated machinery and/or its components consisting of rotary
`
`bearings, linear guides or bearings, lead screws, belt drives, sensors, etc. For the
`
`last 10 years I have been a consulting engineer working part time on automated
`
`microform scanning equipment.
`
`3
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 3 of 45
`
`
`
`10.
`
`I received my Bachelor’s of Science degree
`
`in Mechanical
`
`Engineering from California State University, Chico in Chico, California in 1991.
`
`11. Upon graduating from California State University, Chico, I was hired
`
`by NEC Electronics as an Assembly Process Engineer. In this role, I was
`
`responsible to maintain and improve high volume, semiconductor manufacturing
`
`assembly processes.
`
`12.
`
`In 1992, I was hired by Healthtek, Inc. as a Senior Engineer. In this
`
`role, I was responsible to manage all technical aspects of high volume / low yield,
`
`disposable, medical product manufacturing.
`
`13.
`
`In 1993, I was hired by SCP Global Technologies as a Senior Staff
`
`Engineer. In this role, I was a technical team leader of complex automation and
`
`mechanical design projects in parallel with solo design work relative to large scale
`
`semiconductor equipment manufacturing.
`
`
`
`I successfully managed and
`
`implemented a number of projects, including innovative concept generation,
`
`planning, scheduling, vendor evaluation, sub-contractor management, formal
`
`presentations, employee supervision and on time deadline completion. In this role
`
`over 11 years, I developed a number of technical strengths, including traditional
`
`engineering, finite element analysis, reliability engineering, fluids handling,
`
`chemical compatibility, airflow management, plastic part design, manufacturing
`
`4
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 4 of 45
`
`
`
`engineering, design for
`
`injection molding, specification writing, creative
`
`packaging, and basic electrical and software skills.
`
`14.
`
`In 1999, I successfully passed
`
`the Idaho State Professional
`
`Engineering examination to become a licensed Professional Engineer (PE).
`
`15.
`
`In 1998, I formed Inventure Engineering, LLC.
`
` Inventure
`
`Engineering, LLC provides consulting engineering, design, and build services to
`
`clients worldwide.
`
` We specialize in assisting our client’s new product
`
`development programs from initial concept through manufacturing. I continue to
`
`consult for clients in my role for Inventure Engineering, LLC. Petitioner is a
`
`current client of Inventure Engineering, LLC.
`
`16. For the past 10 years I have been an engineering consultant with
`
`nextScan, Inc., a manufacturer and innovator of digital film scanning equipment.
`
`During this time, I have performed solo mechanical design work and have worked
`
`alongside teams of engineers, software programmers, and procurement and
`
`manufacturing personnel. This work has involved both roll film scanning as well
`
`as microfilm slides and film strips in jackets or aperture cards.
`
`17.
`
`I have worked on several different designs of microform and roll film
`
`scanning equipment in consultation with nextScan. I have become intimately
`
`5
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 5 of 45
`
`
`
`familiar with all aspects of microform and roll film scanning equipment, including
`
`the electrical and mechanical considerations that go into designing these devices.
`
`18.
`
`In my career, I have been awarded 12 U.S. Patents for 5 different
`
`companies.
`
`19. For these reasons and because of my technical experience and training
`
`as outlined in my curriculum vitae (Ex. 1003), I believe I am qualified to offer
`
`technical opinions regarding the ‘279 Patent and the other documents I reviewed as
`
`part of my work in this matter. I believe I am capable of opining about the state of
`
`the art in these areas at various points in time from the early 1990s to the present,
`
`as I have been familiar with the academic and commercial work being done by
`
`nextScan and others in the industry.
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 8,537,279
`
`20. The ‘279 Patent is titled “Digital Microform Imaging Apparatus.”
`
`(Ex. 1001). It was filed on July 12, 2012 as a continuation of an application that
`
`issued as U.S. Patent No. 8,269,890. I have been asked to assume (and I have
`
`assumed) for purposes of my analysis that the ‘279 Patent has an effective filing
`
`date of May 15, 2007. I have therefore tried to offer opinions in this declaration
`
`through the eyes of one of skill in the art (as defined below in Paragraph 38) as of
`
`May 15, 2007.
`
`6
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 6 of 45
`
`
`
`21. The
`
`‘279 Patent discloses microform
`
`imaging apparatuses.
`
`Microform readers were well known long before the ‘279 Patent. The ‘279 Patent
`
`acknowledges that the principle features of microform readers–a chassis, a mirror,
`
`a lens, an image sensor and an adjuster–were well known many years before May
`
`15, 2007. (Ex. 1001 at 2:16-29 and 2:43-44). The ‘279 Patent further recognizes
`
`that the digital aspects incorporated into the claimed invention were not novel.
`
`(Ex. 1001 at 2:21-24 and 2:43-44). Rather, digitization of microfilm was a natural
`
`result of the prevalence of computers and the digital age. (Ex. 1001 at 1:53-60).
`
`22. The ‘279 Patent indicates that “[w]hat is needed in the art is a
`
`compact and versatile digital microform imaging apparatus which can easily adapt
`
`to a broad range of reduction ratios and media types while providing good
`
`resolution of the images and ease of use.” (Ex. 1001 at 2:52-55). Claims 44 and
`
`49 of the ‘279 Patent do not require that the digital microform imaging apparatus
`
`be compact in any way.
`
`SUMMARY OF OPINIONS
`
`23. As discussed in more detail below, my review of prior art documents
`
`in this proceeding demonstrates that the individual components of the ‘279 Patent
`
`were well known as of the earliest possible priority date of May 15, 2007.
`
`Specifically, microform readers have existed for decades and certainly predate the
`
`7
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 7 of 45
`
`
`
`‘279 Patent. The ‘279 Patent discloses microform reader patents dating back to
`
`1973, but these reading devices were well known long before the 1970s. (Ex. 1001
`
`at 1:38-40, 1:59-60, 2:16-17, 2:43-44). Microform reading devices have been used
`
`for nearly a century to read and view documents stored as microform including
`
`Microfilm, Microfiche, Aperture cards, etc. Microform is stored on reel film or as
`
`cassettes, which can hold thousands of pages of miniaturized documents for
`
`efficient archiving and storage. A user operates a microform reader to access the
`
`archived documents through magnification and display. Microform’s ability to
`
`store many documents in a small space became increasingly popular in the 1950s
`
`when libraries used it for the archival of deteriorating newspaper collections and
`
`record preservation.
`
`24. Due to the increased popularity of microform, microform readers were
`
`increasingly developed to enable users to retrieve and view the image information
`
`stored on the microform. The basic operation of a microform reader has not
`
`changed for decades, i.e., microform readers retrieve image information by
`
`projecting a magnified view of microform images to readable proportions. The
`
`image can then be viewed, printed, or saved by the user.
`
`25. To improve image quality, many prior art microform readers included
`
`focus and magnification adjustment functionality, which is typically achieved by
`
`8
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 8 of 45
`
`
`
`moving the lens and/or image sensor. Devices with moving components are not a
`
`new concept. Rotating and translating parts have been a part of mechanical
`
`reading and imaging devices for the last century. Achieving motion within a
`
`microform reading or imaging device has been accomplished much in the same
`
`way for decades. The well known and long used configurations to convert motor
`
`drive shaft rotational energy into linear motion include lead members, guide rails,
`
`and rack and pinion arrangements. A lead member arrangement, such as a
`
`threaded lead screw (e.g., worm) and threaded (driven) nut enables linear motion
`
`as the threaded nut moves along the rotating lead member (e.g., worm). The motor
`
`shaft can be directly connected to the lead member or can be coupled to the lead
`
`member through the use of pulleys and belts, gears or other means of rotary motion
`
`transmission. Another well known technique includes a guide rail, pulleys, and a
`
`drive belt. The drive belt may be coupled to a carriage that slides along the guide
`
`rail as the drive shaft rotates a drive pulley. Additionally, a rack and pinion gear
`
`arrangement can be used, such that rotation of the motor shaft guides the pinion
`
`gear along the rack.
`
`26. With the advent of the computer and advances in electronic storage,
`
`digital conversions of microform became popular. (Ex. 1001 at 1:53-60).
`
`Microform readers were adapted with image sensors such as line sensors and area
`
`9
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 9 of 45
`
`
`
`sensors to capture the image information from the projected film that could be
`
`saved and stored electronically. Many microform readers were integrated with
`
`computers to save digital copies of the scanned images.
`
`27. Fujinawa, Kokubo, and Watanabe disclose microform imaging
`
`apparatuses that include a chassis, a fold mirror, a first elongated and substantially
`
`straight lead member, a first carriage coupled to the first lead member, an area
`
`sensor, a lens, and a first motor. Fujinawa discloses an area sensor supported by
`
`the first carriage that is movable to adjust the distance between the area sensor and
`
`the fold mirror. Additionally, Fujinawa discloses a lens that is positioned between
`
`the area sensor and the fold mirror. Both Kokubo and Watanabe disclose a
`
`carriage that is slidingly coupled to the first lead member. Fujinawa discloses a
`
`first motor coupled to the first carriage for moving the first carriage within a range
`
`of motion along a portion of the lead member, and both Kokubo and Watanabe
`
`specifically disclose a first motor coupled to the first carriage via a first belt for
`
`moving the first carriage within a range of motion along at least a portion of the
`
`first lead member.
`
`28. At a high level, the features disclosed in the ‘279 Patent were not new
`
`as of May 15, 2007, as further discussed below. My review of the documents
`
`referenced in the preceding paragraph comports with my experience that those of
`
`10
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 10 of 45
`
`
`
`skill in the art before 2007 knew of and regularly worked with devices having the
`
`features mentioned in the above paragraph. The figure below is a schematic
`
`representation of the Fujinawa microform imaging apparatus (e.g., Ex. 1004 at Fig.
`
`4) and is representative of the well known features of microform imaging
`
`apparatuses.
`
`
`29. Chassis have been used in microform readers since their inception to
`
`support the different components of the microform reader. For example, the
`
`chassis is used to support lenses, mirrors, motors, etc. As illustrated above, the
`
`11
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 11 of 45
`
`
`
`chassis may be in the form of a frame or other support structure to support the light
`
`source, film carrier, fold mirror, lens, sensor, lead member, carriage(s) and/or
`
`motor(s). For example, the 5100 Fiche ScanStation includes a chassis that
`
`supports the other components of the microform reader. (Ex. 1007 at Fig. 2.1b).
`
`Several other example microform readers also include a chassis. (Ex. 1004 at ¶
`
`0033, Figures 3-6); (Ex. 1005 at 8:52-54, Figures 1, 2, 4, and 6-8); (Ex. 1006 at
`
`5:9-13, Figure 1).
`
`30. Mirrors have been used in microform readers to change the direction
`
`of the light path within the device. Even the earliest of projector systems and
`
`microform readers used mirrors to project images illuminated by a light source
`
`onto a projector screen. In the same sense, fold mirrors are used in digital systems
`
`to direct light towards the image sensor, which enables the optical components to
`
`be positioned on different axes than the light source. As illustrated above, the fold
`
`mirror (shown in green) is supported by the chassis and directs light from the light
`
`source, through the lens (shown in yellow) to the sensor (shown in purple). For
`
`example, the 5100 Fiche ScanStation includes a fold mirror that directs light
`
`projected through the lens to the image sensor or CCD. (Ex. 1007 at Figures 2.2a
`
`and 2.2b, p.16). Several other example microform readers also include fold
`
`12
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 12 of 45
`
`
`
`mirrors. (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0039, Figures 3-6); (Ex. 1005 at 8:61-64, 12:1-33, Figures
`
`17, 18, and 56); (Ex. 1006 at 5:24-27, Figures 1-4 and 6).
`
`31. Lead members are one of the many ways, described above, that
`
`microform readers move components within the device. For example, a lead
`
`member may be used with a belt and a motor to move a lens, an image sensor,
`
`and/or a film housing to ensure that the image is properly magnified and focused.
`
`As illustrated above, the lead members (shown in blue) are supported by the
`
`chassis and enable the carriage(s) (shown in red) to slide along the respective lead
`
`members. In the illustration, both the sensor (shown in purple) and the lens
`
`(shown in yellow) are supported by carriages (shown in red) such that both can be
`
`moved along the respective lead member (shown in blue). Similarly, the 5100
`
`Fiche ScanStation includes several different lead members that are used to support
`
`components to slide along. (Ex. 1007 at Figure 2.1b, p. 17). Several other
`
`example microform readers also include lead members. (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0059,
`
`Figures 3-6); (Ex. 1005 at 8:52-59, Figures 1-4, 10, and 12); (Ex. 1006 at 6:62-65,
`
`Figure 2).
`
`32. Carriages have been used in microform readers and other devices to
`
`support components, especially components that move within the microform
`
`device. For example, lenses and image sensors may be attached to carriages to
`
`13
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 13 of 45
`
`
`
`provide additional support and to position the components within the device. As
`
`illustrated above, carriages (shown in red) couple the optical components (e.g., lens
`
`and sensor) to the lead member (shown in blue) such that they can slide along the
`
`lead member. The 5100 Fiche ScanStation includes several cards, or carriages,
`
`that support different components within the device. For example, a camera card
`
`provides a mount for the CCD and is adjustable along the optical axis to provide
`
`fine focus adjustment. (Ex. 1007 at p. 16). Additionally, the camera card is
`
`mounted on a series of brackets that provide rigidity and at the same time
`
`adjustment of the CCD in three axes such that the whole card plus the CCD can be
`
`moved along the optical axis by a small amount to obtain the optimum focus. (Ex.
`
`1007 at p. 17). Several other example microform readers also include carriages.
`
`(Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0059, Figures 3-6); (Ex. 1005 at 8:52-64, 9:11-17, Figures 1-3); (Ex.
`
`1006 at 6:62 to 7:3, Figure 2).
`
`33. As discussed above, with the advent of the computer and the
`
`continuing advances in electronic storage, digital conversions of microform
`
`became popular. (Ex. 1001 at 1:53-60). Microform readers were adapted with
`
`image sensors such as line sensors and area sensors to capture the image
`
`information from the projected film. As illustrated above, the sensor (shown in
`
`purple), such as an area sensor, is supported by the carriage (shown in red) and is
`
`14
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 14 of 45
`
`
`
`used to capture image data of the microform. The carriage (shown in red) supports
`
`the area sensor (shown in purple) for movement to adjust the distance between the
`
`optical components (e.g., lens and fold mirror) to control the focus and the zoom of
`
`the microform imaging apparatus. For example, the 5100 Fiche ScanStation
`
`includes a CCD to digitize the film image. (ScanStation at p. 7, p. 14-17). Several
`
`other example microform readers also include image sensors such as area sensors.
`
`(Ex. 1004 at ¶¶ 0009, 0039, 0049, 0055, 0059, 0112, Figures 3-6); (Ex. 1005 at
`
`8:61-64, 11:63 to 12:6, 2:37-39, Figures 17, 18, 56); (Ex. 1006 at 6:62-65, 7:66-68,
`
`10:4-13, Figure 2).
`
`34. Lenses are used to magnify and/or focus the image on the film such
`
`that the film is readable. As illustrated above, the lens (shown in yellow) is
`
`supported by a carriage (shown in red), which is ultimately supported by the
`
`chassis, and is positioned between the sensor (shown in purple) and the fold mirror
`
`(shown in green). In other examples, the lens (shown in yellow) may be directly
`
`coupled to and supported by the chassis. For example, the 5100 Fiche ScanStation
`
`includes a lens that collects and focuses the light projected through the film onto
`
`the image sensor. (Ex. 1007 at Figures 2.2a and 2.2b, p. 15-17). Several other
`
`example microform readers also include lenses. (Ex. 1004 at ¶¶ 0039, 0055, 0059,
`
`15
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 15 of 45
`
`
`
`Figures 3-6); (Ex. 1005 at 8:61-64, 2:37-39, 12:1-6, Figures 17, 18, and 56); (Ex.
`
`1006 at 5:22-27, Figures 1-4 and 6).
`
`35. Motors have been used in microform readers for various tasks. For
`
`example, motors have been used in microform readers to advance and rewind film.
`
`Similarly, motors have been used to move other components of the microform
`
`reader such as the lens and/or the area sensor. For example, the 5100 Fiche
`
`ScanStation includes a motorized lens to provide accurate focusing of the optical
`
`system. (Ex. 1007 at p. 16). Additionally, the 5100 Fiche ScanStation includes
`
`several motors that use different belts, pulleys, and guide rails to move components
`
`within the device. (Ex. 1007 at p. 15-18, 27). Several other example microform
`
`readers also include motors. (Ex. 1004 at ¶¶ 0039, 0041-0043, 0051, 0059, 0060,
`
`Figures 3-6); (Ex. 1005 at 9:10-17, Figures 1, 2, and 4); (Ex. 1006 at 6:57-58, 6:65
`
`to 7:3, 7:11-13, Figures 2-4).
`
`36. Drive mechanisms have been used in microform readers and other
`
`devices to move components within the microform device. The drive mechanism
`
`may be linked (e.g., coupled) to the carriage (shown in red) and supported by the
`
`chassis. The drive mechanism may be linked to the carriage via any conventional
`
`technique such as a drive belt and pulley for moving the carriage along the lead
`
`member. For example, the 5100 Fiche ScanStation includes several drive
`
`16
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 16 of 45
`
`
`
`mechanisms that use different belts, pulleys, and guide rails to move components
`
`within the device. (Ex. 1007 at p. 15-18, 27). Several other example microform
`
`readers also include drive mechanisms. (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0059, Figures 3-6); (Ex.
`
`1005 at 9:11-18, Figures 1, 2, and 4); (Ex. 1006 at 6:62 to 7:3, Figure 2).
`
`37. The combinations I was asked to consider in the instant proceeding
`
`(i.e., (1) Fujinawa combined with Kokubo and (2) Fujinawa combined with
`
`Watanabe) could and would have been made by a person of ordinary skill in the art
`
`as of May 15, 2007. I was asked to perform that task without using “hindsight”
`
`reasoning. Instead, I was asked to consider the feasibility and combinability of
`
`references through the eyes of a person of skill in the art as of May 15, 2007.
`
`38. As I describe below, the individual references are all in the digital
`
`microform imaging space and contain mechanical elements that could be combined
`
`in a predictable manner.
`
`LEVEL OF SKILL IN THE ART
`
`39.
`
`I was asked to provide my opinion about the experience and
`
`background a person of ordinary skill in the art of the ‘279 Patent would have had
`
`as of May 15, 2007. In my opinion, such a person of skill in the art would have
`
`had at least a bachelor’s of science degree in either electrical engineering or
`
`mechanical engineering with at least 3 years’ experience designing electro-
`
`17
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 17 of 45
`
`
`
`mechanical products including experience designing imaging equipment such as
`
`copiers, scanners, and/or microform scanners and readers. Such a person would
`
`understand the optical considerations and the mechanical constraints within these
`
`devices.
`
`40. Under my definition, I believe that I was a person of ordinary skill in
`
`the art as of May 15, 2007. Furthermore, I believe that I can opine today about
`
`what those of skill in the art would have known and understood as of May 15,
`
`2007.
`
`THE FUJINAWA PUBLICATION
`
`41. As part of my work in this proceeding, I was asked to review U.S.
`
`Patent Publication No. 2004/0012827 (“Fujinawa”) (Ex. 1004).
`
`42. Fujinawa is entitled “Image Reading Apparatus” and is generally
`
`directed an image reading apparatus for reading film images, in particular, an
`
`image reading apparatus that can handle films having different sizes. (Ex. 1004 at
`
`¶ 0003). Figures 1 and 3 to 6 of Fujinawa illustrate an “image reading apparatus.”
`
`43. Fujinawa discloses a digital microform imaging apparatus. Fujinawa
`
`describes that the “image signal processing circuit 15 amplifies, signal processes
`
`and digitizes the signals from line sensor 28. The image signal processing circuit
`
`also supplies the digitized signals to CPU 11.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0064). Figure 4 of
`
`18
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 18 of 45
`
`
`
`Fujinawa is annotated and reproduced below as an example of a digital microform
`
`imaging apparatus.
`
`
`44. The image reading apparatus of Fujinawa includes a chassis. Figure 1
`
`of Fujinawa illustrates “an image reading apparatus 1 including a cover 2 on an
`
`upper surface thereof.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0033). In my opinion, it is apparent that the
`
`cover and other structural components are supported by a frame (e.g., chassis) that
`
`gives sufficient structural integrity to the device.
`
`45. Fujinawa also discloses a fold mirror supported by the chassis.
`
`Fujinawa describes that “the image reading apparatus comprises… a reflective
`19
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 19 of 45
`
`
`
`mirror 30.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0039; see, e.g., at Figures 3 to 6). Figure 4 of Fujinawa
`
`illustrates a fold mirror including a reflecting surface (e.g., reflective mirror 30)
`
`supported by the chassis and aligned with the first (e.g., vertical) and second
`
`optical axis (e.g., horizontal axis). As discussed above, the components (e.g.,
`
`reflective mirror 30) are supported within the image reading apparatus. In my
`
`opinion, the components, such as the fold mirror, are supported by a chassis.
`
`46. Figures 3 to 6 of Fujinawa illustrate a first elongated and substantially
`
`straight lead member (e.g., worm connected to rotating shaft of motor 26)
`
`supported by the chassis. Specifically, Fujinawa states that the “sensor 28 is
`
`supported by a worm that couples the line sensor to the rotating shaft of the
`
`[reading] motor 26 so that the position of the light-receiving surface can be moved
`
`in accordance with the rotation of the rotating shaft.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0059; see, e.g.,
`
`Figures 3 to 6). As illustrated in Figure 4, the first lead member is substantially
`
`parallel to the second optical axis (e.g., horizontal axis).
`
`47. Fujinawa also discloses a first carriage coupled to the first lead
`
`member and an area sensor supported by the first carriage for movement therewith
`
`to adjust the distance between the area sensor and the fold mirror. Figures 3 to 6 of
`
`Fujinawa illustrate a first carriage (e.g., structure that sensor 28 is attached to)
`
`coupled to the first lead member (e.g., worm connected to rotating shaft of motor
`
`20
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 20 of 45
`
`
`
`26) and an area sensor (e.g., sensor 28) supported by the carriage for movement to
`
`adjust the distance between the sensor 28 and the fold mirror (e.g., reflective
`
`mirror 30), which is depicted by the double headed arrow below sensor 28 to
`
`illustrate movement towards and away from the fold mirror. Fujinawa describes
`
`that “[t]he image reading apparatus comprises . . . sensor 28” and that “sensor 28
`
`is supported by a worm that couples the line sensor to the rotating shaft of the
`
`[reading] motor 26 so that the position of the light-receiving surface can be moved
`
`in accordance with the rotation of the rotating shaft.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶¶ 0039, 0059).
`
`48. Fujinawa explains that the sensor may be either a line sensor or an
`
`area sensor. (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0049). Regarding area sensors, Fujinawa describes an
`
`area sensor having a plurality of photoelectric converters arranged in a matrix of
`
`rows and columns. (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0112). Specifically, Fujinawa states that “if an
`
`area-type image sensor were provided instead of the line sensor 28, it would not be
`
`necessary to feed the film using rollers 38 and 39 during image reading of a
`
`frame.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0049). Moreover, Fujinawa describes that other imaging
`
`apparatuses have used area sensors. Specifically, Fujinawa describes that a
`
`“second type of film scanner uses an area sensor having a plurality of photoelectric
`
`converters arranged in rows and columns (i.e., a matrix). Japanese Laid-Open
`
`Patent Application No. 5-75922 uses an area sensor.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0009; see
`
`21
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 21 of 45
`
`
`
`e.g., Figures 4 to 6). Thus, in my opinion, Fujinawa discloses an area sensor
`
`supported by the carriage for movement therewith to adjust the distance between
`
`the area sensor and the fold mirror.
`
`49.
`
`In Fujinawa, the first carriage moves along the lead member (e.g.,
`
`worm connected to rotating shaft of motor 26) as the lead member rotates. In my
`
`opinion, that movement may be considered sliding as it must also be supported by
`
`some type of lead member or linear slide (bearing) to cause anti-rotation of the
`
`carriage. Regardless, in the combination with Kokubo detailed below, it would
`
`have been within the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art to replace the
`
`“worm” of Fujinawa with a guide rail and belt/pulley as disclosed in Kokubo. In
`
`that instance, the carriage is unquestionably “slidingly coupled” to the lead
`
`member (i.e., the guide rail along which it slides when driven by the belt).
`
`50. Fujinawa also discloses a lens supported by the chassis and positioned
`
`between the area sensor and the fold mirror. For example, Fujinawa describes a
`
`lens supported by a carriage, which is coupled to a shaft and a motor, which is
`
`supported by the chassis. Figures 3 to 6 of Fujinawa illustrate that the lens is
`
`positioned between the area sensor and the fold mirror along the second optical
`
`axis (e.g., horizontal axis). Specifically, Figure 4 of Fujinawa depicts a lens (e.g.,
`
`lens 29) positioned between the area sensor (e.g., sensor 28) and fold mirror (e.g.,
`
`22
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 22 of 45
`
`
`
`reflective mirror 30). Fujinawa states that “[t]he image reading apparatus
`
`comprises . . . a lens 29” and that the “[l]ens 29 is supported by a worm that
`
`couples the lens to the rotating shaft of lens motor 27 so that it can move in
`
`accordance with rotation of the rotating shaft.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶¶ 0039, 0059).
`
`Fujinawa further explains that the lens is between the area sensor and the fold
`
`mirror by stating that the “light transmitted through the film is introduced to the
`
`line sensor 28 via the lens 29.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0055; see also, e.g., Figures 3 to 6).
`
`As discussed above, the components (e.g., lens 29) are supported within the image
`
`reading apparatus. Thus, in my opinion, the components, such as the lens, are
`
`supported by a chassis.
`
`51. Fujinawa also discloses a first motor coupled to the first carriage for
`
`moving the first carriage within a range of motion along at least a portion of the
`
`first lead member. Figure 4 of Fujinawa illustrates a first motor (e.g., motor 26)
`
`having a first motor shaft (e.g., rotating shaft) coupled to the first carriage (e.g.,
`
`structure that sensor 28 is attached to), and the double headed arrow illustrates the
`
`first carriage moving through a first range of motion along at least a portion of the
`
`first lead member. Additionally, as illustrated above, the first motor is supported
`
`by the chassis. Fujinawa describes that the “line sensor 28 is supported by a worm
`
`that couples the line sensor to the rotating shaft of the [reading] motor 26 so that
`
`23
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 23 of 45
`
`
`
`the position of the light-receiving surface can be moved in accordance with the
`
`rotation of the rotating shaft.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0059). In Fujinawa, the “CPU 11
`
`separately drives the reading motor 26 and the lens motor 27 by controlling the
`
`optical system motor drive circuit 14. This control adjusts the reading scope and
`
`resolution.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0060; see also ¶ 0066) (“The resolution and reading
`
`scope of line sensor 28 is then adjusted by controlling the optical system motor
`
`drive circuit 14.”). Additionally, Fujinawa explains that the “CPU 11 modifies the
`
`resolution of the main scan direction to the reading width of approximately 16.7
`
`mm (specific to roll film) by performing position adjustment of the line
`
`sensor 28 and the lens 29. This is done by the optical system drive motor 14.”
`
`(Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0104).
`
`52. Fujinawa also discloses a drive mechanism (e.g., threads of worm and
`
`mating threads or teeth of carriage) that is linked to the motor via the worm and the
`
`rotating shaft of the motor. While Fujinawa discloses a mechanism for coupling
`
`the first motor to the first carriage while the motor moves the carriage along the
`
`lead member, it does not specifically disclos