UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`
`DELL INC., EMC CORPORATION, HEWLETT-PACKARD
`ENTERPRISE CO., AND HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REALTIME DATA LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`___________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`___________________
`
`
`
`
`
`REALTIME DATA LLC’S UPDATED MANDATORY NOTICES
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(3)
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`
`DELL INC., EMC CORPORATION, HEWLETT-PACKARD
`ENTERPRISE CO., AND HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REALTIME DATA LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`___________________
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`___________________
`
`
`
`
`
`REALTIME DATA LLC’S UPDATED MANDATORY NOTICES
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(3)
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(3), Patent Owner Realtime Data LLC hereby
`
`
`
`files its updated Mandatory Notices.
`
`I.
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2) – RELATED MATTERS
`A.
`Patent Owner notifies the Board of the following proceedings that may
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving the Patent-at-Issue
`
`
`
`affect or be affected by a decision in this proceeding.
`
`This Inter Partes Review is one of twenty-nine petitions filed against eleven
`
`patents owned by Patent Owner: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,597,812 (“the ’812 patent”),
`
`7,161,506 (“the ’506 patent”), 7,181,608 (‟the ’608 patentˮ), 7,358,867 (“the ’867
`
`patent), 7,378,992 (“the ’992 patent”), 7,415,530 (“the ’530 patent”), 8,090,936
`
`(‟the ’936 patentˮ), 8,643,513 (‟the ’513 patentˮ), 8,880,862 (“the ’862 patent”),
`
`9,054,728 (“the ’728 patent”), and 9,116,908 (“the ’908 patent”).
`
`Patent
`No.
`
`6,597,812
`
`7,161,506
`
`Case Caption
`SAP America, Inc. et al v.
`Realtime Data LLC, Case
`IPR2016-00783
`Oracle America, Inc. v. Realtime
`Data LLC, Case IPR2017-00167
`Oracle America, Inc. v. Realtime
`Data LLC, Case IPR2017-00168
`Dell Inc. et al v. Realtime Data
`LLC, Case IPR2017-00176
`Teradata Operations, Inc. v.
`Realtime Data LLC, Case
`IPR2017-00806
`
`Filing Date
`
`Status
`
`April 1, 2016
`
`Instituted
`
`November 2,
`2016
`November 2,
`2016
`November 14,
`2016
`
`January 30,
`2017
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7,358,867
`
`7,378,992
`
`Patent
`Case Caption
`No.
`7,181,608 Apple Inc., v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case No. IPR2016-01365
`Teradata Operations, Inc. v.
`Realtime Data LLC, Case No.
`IPR2017-00557
`Oracle America, Inc. v. Realtime
`Data LLC, Case IPR2016-00373
`Riverbed Technology, Inc. et al v.
`Realtime Data LLC, Case
`IPR2016-00980
`Oracle America, Inc. v. Realtime
`Data LLC, Case IPR2016-00375
`Oracle America, Inc. v. Realtime
`Data LLC, Case IPR2016-00376
`Dell Inc. et al v. Realtime Data
`LLC, Case IPR2016-00878
`Dell Inc. et al v. Realtime Data
`LLC, Case IPR2016-00972
`Oracle America, Inc. v. Realtime
`Data LLC, Case IPR2016-01671
`Veritas Technology LLC v.
`Realtime Data LLC, Case
`IPR2017-00365
`8,090,936 Apple Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case IPR2016-01366
`Oracle America, Inc. v. Realtime
`Data LLC, Case IPR2016-00374
`Riverbed Technology, Inc. et al. v.
`Realtime Data, LLC, Case
`IPR2016-00978
`Veritas Technology LLC v.
`Realtime Data LLC, Case
`IPR2017-00366
`
`7,415,530
`
`8,643,513
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`
`Filing Date
`
`Status
`
`July 8, 2016
`
`Pending
`
`December 30,
`2016
`
`December 22,
`2015
`
`Pending
`
`Instituted
`
`April 29, 2016
`
`Instituted
`
`December 28,
`2015
`December 28,
`2015
`
`Not Instituted
`
`Not Instituted
`
`April 22, 2016
`
`Dismissed
`
`April 29, 2016
`
`Instituted
`
`September 6,
`2016
`
`November 30,
`2016
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`July 8, 2016
`
`Instituted
`
`December 22,
`2015
`
`Instituted
`
`April 29, 2016
`
`Instituted
`
`November 30,
`2016
`
`Pending
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent
`No.
`
`8,880,862
`
`9,054,728
`
`9,116,908
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`
`Case Caption
`Apple Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case IPR2016-01737
`Apple Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case IPR2016-01738
`Apple Inc. v. Realtime Data LLC,
`Case IPR2016-01739
`Oracle America Inc. v. Realtime
`Data LLC, Case IPR2017-00108
`Dell Inc. et al v. Realtime Data
`LLC, Case IPR2017-00179
`Teradata Operations, Inc. v.
`Realtime Data LLC, Case
`IPR2017-00808
`Dell Inc. et al v. Realtime Data
`LLC, Case IPR2016-00377
`Dell Inc. et al v. Realtime Data
`LLC, Case IPR2016-01002
`Oracle America, Inc. v. Realtime
`Data LLC, Case IPR2016-01672
`Veritas Technologies LLC v.
`Realtime Data LLC, Case
`IPR2017-00364
`
`Filing Date
`September 9,
`2016
`September 9,
`2016
`September 9,
`2016
`October 24,
`2016
`November 14,
`2016
`
`January 30,
`2017
`
`December 28,
`2015
`
`Status
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Not Instituted
`
`May 5, 2016
`
`Instituted
`
`September 6,
`2016
`
`November 30,
`2016
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`
`
`The ’506 patent has previously been the subject an inter partes
`
`reexamination before the USPTO:
`
`• Reexamination No. 95/000,478, filed May 21, 2009 (Reexamination
`Certificate issued October 4, 2012).
`
`• Reexamination No. 95/001,928 filed March 2, 2012 (Reexamination
`Certificate issued January 8, 2014);
`
`• Reexamination No. 95/001,924 filed March 2, 2012 (Reexamination
`Certificate issued August 4, 2014);
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`• Reexamination No. 95/001,517 filed December 30, 2010;
`
`
`
`• Reexamination No. 95/000,479 filed May 28, 2009 (Reexamination
`Certificate issued May 22, 2012); and
`
`• Reexamination No. 95/001,926 filed March 2, 2012 (Reexamination
`Certificate issued January 8, 2014).
`
`Litigation Involving the Patent-at-Issue
`
`B.
`Patent Owner notifies the Board of the following litigation proceedings that
`
`involving U.S. Patents commonly-owned with the ’506 patent, which may affect or
`
`be affected by a decision in this proceeding:
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Echostar Corporation et al., 6:17-cv-
`
`00084 (E.D. Texas), filed February 14, 2017;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Oracle America, Inc., No. 6:17-cv-
`
`00046 (E.D. Texas), filed January 23, 2017;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Vembu Technologies, Inc., No. 6:16-cv-
`01037 (E.D. Texas), filed July 22, 2016;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Fujitsu America, Inc. et al., No. 6:16-
`cv-01035 (E.D. Texas), filed July 21, 2016;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC v. Rackspace US, Inc. et al., No. 6:16-cv-00961
`(E.D. Texas), filed June 29, 2016;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC v. Teradata Operations. Inc., No. 2:16-cv-02743
`(C.D. California), filed April 21, 2016;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC v. Teradata Corporation, et al., No. 3:16-cv-01836
`(N.D. California), filed April 8, 2016 (terminated May 18, 2016)
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`(originally Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Teradata Corporation et al.,
`No. 6:15-cv-00470 (E.D. Texas), which was filed May 8, 2015 and
`transferred to N.D. California);
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. et al.,
`No. 6:16-cv-00086 (E.D. Texas), filed February 26, 2016;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. CenturyLink, Inc. et al., No. 6:16-cv-
`00087 (E.D. Texas), filed February 26, 2016;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Oracle America, Inc. No. 6:16-cv-00088
`(E.D. Texas), filed February 26, 2016;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Dell Inc. et al., No. 6:16-cv-00089 (E.D.
`Texas), filed February 26, 2016;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Apple Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00885 (E.D.
`Texas), filed October 5, 2015;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Actian Corporation et al., No. 6:15-cv-
`00463 (E.D. Texas), filed May 8, 2015;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. BMC Software, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00464
`(E.D. Texas), filed May 8, 2015 (terminated October 5, 2015);
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Dropbox Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00465 (E.D.
`Texas), filed May 8, 2015 (terminated February 22, 2016);
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Echostar Corporation, et al., No. 6:15-
`cv-00466 (E.D. Texas), filed May 8, 2015;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Oracle America, Inc. et al., No. 6:15-cv-
`00467 (E.D. Texas), filed May 8, 2015;
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Riverbed Technology, Inc. et al., No.
`6:15-cv-00468 (E.D. Texas), filed May 8, 2015;
`
`
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. SAP America, Inc. et al., No. 6:15-cv-
`00469 (E.D. Texas), filed May 8, 2015;
`
`• Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Microsoft Corporation et al., 4:14-cv-
`00827 (E.D. Texas), filed December 19, 2014
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, No. 3:12-cv-01048 (S.D.
`California), filed April 27, 2012;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC, et. al., No.
`6:10-cv-00493 (E.D. Texas), filed September 23, 2010;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., No. 13-1095
`(C.A.F.C.), filed December 6, 2012;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC v. CME Group, Inc., et al., No. 13-1097 (C.A.F.C.),
`filed December 6, 2012;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., No. 13-1098
`(C.A.F.C.), filed December 6, 2012;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC v. Morgan Stanley, et al., No. 13-1099 (C.A.F.C.),
`filed December 6, 2012;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC v. CME Group, Inc., et al., No. 13-1100 (C.A.F.C.),
`filed December 6, 2012;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., No. 13-1101
`(C.A.F.C.), filed December 6, 2012;
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`• Realtime Data, LLC v. Morgan Stanley, et al., No. 13-1103 (C.A.F.C.),
`filed December 6, 2012;
`
`
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC v. CME Group, Inc., et al., No. 13-1093 (C.A.F.C.),
`filed December 6, 2012;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., No. 1-11-cv-
`06696 (S.D. New York), filed September 26, 2011;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group, Inc., et al., No. 1-11-cv-
`06697 (S.D. New York), filed September 26, 2011;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., No. 1-
`11-cv-06698 (S.D. New York), filed September 26, 2011;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group, Inc., et al., No. 1-11-cv-
`06699 (S.D. New York), filed September 26, 2011;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., No. 1-
`11-cv-06700 (S.D. New York), filed September 26, 2011;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., No. 1-11-cv-
`06701 (S.D. New York), filed September 26, 2011;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group, Inc., et al., No. 6-10-cv-
`00246 (E.D. Texas), filed May 11, 2010;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., No. 6-
`10-cv-00247 (E.D. Texas), filed May 11, 2010;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., No. 6-10-cv-
`00248 (E.D. Texas), filed May 11, 2010;
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`• Thomson Reuters Corporation v. Realtime Data, LLC, No. 1-09-cv-
`07868 (S.D. New York), filed September 11, 2009;
`
`
`
`• Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated v. Realtime Data, LLC,
`No. 1-09-cv-04486 (N.D. Illinois), filed July 24, 2009;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Thomson Reuters Corp., et al., No. 6-
`09-cv-00333 (E.D. Texas), filed July 23, 2009;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley, et al., No. 6-09-cv-
`00326 (E.D. Texas), filed July 22, 2009;
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group, Inc., et al., No. 6-09-cv-
`00327 (E.D. Texas), filed July 22, 2009; and
`
`• Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Packeteer, Inc., et al., No. 6-08-cv-
`00144 (E.D. Texas), filed April 18, 2008.
`
`B. U.S. Patents and Applications Related to the Patent-at-Issue
`Out of an abundance of caution and in accordance with the Office Patent
`
`Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012), Patent Owner
`
`notifies the Board of related patents and patent applications that may affect or be
`
`affected by a decision in this proceeding:
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 09/210,491, filed December 11, 1998 (now
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,195,024, issued February 27, 2001);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 09/705,446, filed November 3, 2000 (now
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,309,424, issued October 30, 2001);
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 10/016,355, filed October 29, 2001 (now
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,624,761, issued September 23, 2003);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 11/651,366, filed January 8, 2007 (now
`
`abandoned);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 11/651,365, filed January 8, 2007 (now U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,714,747, issued May 11, 2010);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 12/703,042, filed February 9, 2010 (now
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,502,707, issued August 6, 2013);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 13/154,211, filed June 6, 2011 (now U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,643,513, issued February 4, 2014);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 14/035,561, filed September 24, 2013 (now
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,717,203, issued May 6, 2014);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 14/251,453, filed April 11, 2014 (now U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,933,825, issued January 13, 2015);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 14/727,309, filed June 1, 2015 (now
`
`pending);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 14/936,312, filed November 9, 2015 (now
`
`pending);
`
`
`
`- 9 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 11/400,533, filed April 8, 2006 (now U.S.
`
`
`
`Patent No. 7,378,992, issued May 27, 2008);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 11/400,340, filed April 8, 2006 (now U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,358,867, issued April 15, 2008);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 11/651,175, filed January 8, 2007 (now U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,352,300, issued April 1, 2008);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 14/495,574, filed September 24, 2014 (now
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,054,728, issued June 9, 2015);
`
`• U.S. Patent Application No. 15/391,240, filed December 27, 2016 (now
`
`pending);
`
`II. LEAD AND BACKUP COUNSEL
`
`Patent Owner hereby adds Tyler J. Dutton and William P. Rothwell as back-
`
`up counsel.
`
`The lead counsel for Patent Owner is:
`Jason D. Eisenberg, Reg. No. 43,447 (unchanged)
`jasone-PTAB@skgf.com
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3932
`Tel.: 202-772-8645
`Fax: 202-371-2540
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 10 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`
`The backup counsel for Patent Owner are:
`Donald J. Featherstone, Reg. No. 33,876 (unchanged)
`donf-PTAB@skgf.com
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3932
`Tel.: 202-772-8629
`
`Fax: 202-371-2540
`Robert Greene Sterne, Reg. No. 28, 912 (unchanged)
`rsterne-PTAB@skgf.com
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3932
`Tel.: 202-772-8555
`
`Fax: 202-371-2540
`
`Joseph E. Mutschelknaus, Reg. No. 63,285 (unchanged)
`jmutsche-PTAB@skgf.com
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3932
`Tel.: 202-772-8874
`
`Fax: 202-371-2540
`
`Tyler J. Dutton, Reg. No. 75,069 (new)
`tdutton-PTAB@skgf.com
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3932
`Tel.: 202-772-8982
`
`Fax: 202-371-2540
`
`
`
`
`
`- 11 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`
`William P. Rothwell, Reg. No. 72,522 (new)
`william@noroozipc.com
`NOROOZI PC
`2245 Texas Drive, Suite 300
`Sugar Land, TX 77479
`Tel.: 281-566-2685
`
`III. 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(4) – SERVICE INFORMATION
`Please address all correspondence to the lead and back-up counsel as shown
`
`above. Patent Owner consents to electronic service by e-mail at ptab@skgf.com
`
`and at all e-mail addresses provided above.
`
`
`
`Date: February 24, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`/Jason D. Eisenberg/
`
`Jason D. Eisenberg, Registration No. 43,447
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 12 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00176
`Patent 7,161,506
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e))
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing REALTIME DATA
`
`LLC’S UPDATED MANDATORY NOTICES PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.8(a)(3) were served in their entirety electronically via e-mail on February 24,
`
`2017 to the following counsel of record for Petitioner:
`
`Andrew R. Sommer (Lead Counsel)
`Thomas M. Dunham (Back-up Counsel)
`Garth A. Winn (Back-up Counsel)
`Vivek V. Krishnan (Back-up Counsel)
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`IPR2017-00176@winston.com
`garth.winn@klarquist.com
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jason D. Eisenberg/
`Jason D. Eisenberg, Registration No. 43,447
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Date: February 24, 2017
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C.20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 13 -
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
