`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`SHERMAN DIVISION
`
`
`
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL
`
`VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.,
`F/K/A TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT GROUP,
`INC., VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC., F/K/A
`TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.,
`AND TRILOGY, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CASE NO. 4:15-CV-00316
`
`JUDGE RON CLARK
`
`
`
`
`
`BRC
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`The parties to this case are involved in parallel proceedings in the U.S. District Court for
`
`the Eastern District of Michigan, Civil Action No. 15-cv-10628. On October 22, 2015, the parties
`
`notified this court that an October 14, 2015 Opinion and Order was entered in that case by the Hon.
`
`Matthew F. Leitman. [Dkt. # 67]. Judge Leitman denied Versata’s Motion to Dismiss, or
`
`Alternatively to Transfer to the Eastern District of Texas. [Dkt. # 67-1]. On November 5, 2015,
`
`this court gave the parties until November 30, 2015 to file notice of any good faith reasons that this
`
`case should not be dismissed, without prejudice, so that the issues may be dealt with by the
`
`Michigan court. [Dkt. # 68]. Only Plaintiff responded, stating that it was not opposed to dismissal.
`
`[Dkt. # 69].
`
`Based on Judge Leitman’s ruling and the fact that neither party has provided arguments
`
`against dismissing the case, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to
`
`Plaintiff’s ability to assert its claims in the Michigan court.
`
`
`
`So ordered and signed on
`
`Dec 3, 2015
`
`FORD 1134
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
