throbber
:onference Record
`
`IEEE Catalog Number
`76 CH 1149-4 CSCB
`
`Volume I
`
`1976
`National
`Telecommunications
`Conference
`
`Communications and Knowledge,
`Partners in Progress
`Copyright c 1976 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.,
`345 East 47th Street, New York , N.Y. 10017
`
`NTC 76 • November 29, 30 and 1 December 1976
`Dallas, Texas
`
`•
`
`VIZIO, Inc. Exhibit 1025
`1 of 7
`
`

`
`Conference Record
`1976 National Telecommunications Conference
`(NTC 76)
`
`I K
`5101
`f!\\
`f\(~'74-
`1'11"
`'{, \
`
`Copyright ~ 1976 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Eng ineers, Inc.,
`345 East 47th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017
`
`Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 57-20724
`IEEE Catalog Number 76CH1149-4 CSCB
`
`II
`
`VIZIO, Inc. Exhibit 1025
`2 of 7
`
`

`
`COMPOSITE INTERFRAME CODING or NTSC COLOR TELEVISION SIGNALS
`
`Tatsuo Ishiguro, Kazumoto Iinuma, Yuldhiko Iijima,
`Toshio Koga, Shintaro Azami and Takayoshi Mune
`
`Nippon Electric Company Ltd.
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`This paper describes an interframe codec ~hich
`directly encodes composite NTSC color television
`signals at a transmission bit rate of 16 - 32 Mb/s
`for use as high quality television transmission. The
`coding principle is based on transmitting a higher
`order differential PCM signal of frame difference
`vith a variable length coding . As methods of
`suppressing un~anted significant picture elements,
`a compensation for sub- carrier phase inversion
`between frames and a nonlinear function in the coding
`loop are adopted. For signals with large amount of
`motions, a sub- Nyquist sampling is used to reduce
`coding bit rate .
`
`The codec is transparent for the composite
`video signal, providing high color fidelity no
`resolution loss and wide band (5 MHz) capability. A
`codec, which is named NETEC-22H, is constructed .
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Interframe coding is expected as a powerful
`method for realizing a television transmission vith
`very low bit rate.l-4 NETEC 6/16 system2,3 demon(cid:173)
`strated that, although pictures were restricted to
`those with a little motions as conference television
`signals, NTSC color television signals could be
`transmitted at 6 Mbit/sec and that, at 16 Mbit/sec,
`most of broadcast television pictures could be
`transmitted with good picture quality . However, the
`coding performances were not sufficient in the sense
`
`that a jerkiness was caused for violent motion and
`that the separate component coding produced small
`deteriorations in resolution and color fiderity .
`order to avoid these deteriorations, a composite
`coding must be applied to interframe coding. The
`composite coding has an advantage of preserving
`strictly the waveform of the signals; video, sync,
`color burst, VITS, standard test signals, etc.
`
`In
`
`This paper presents a composite interframe
`coding system aiming at the very high quality with a
`relatively high bit rate of 16 to 32 ~fuit/sec . An
`algorithm and coding performances are discussed . A
`codec, named NETEC-22H, is described briefly.
`
`ENCODING ALGORITHM
`
`System block diagram
`
`NETEC- 22H system block diagram is shown in
`Figure 1. An input composite NTSC color television
`signal is converted into an 8 bit PCM signal by an
`analog- to- digital converter. The PCM signal is
`encoded into a reduced rate coded words with 2 - 3
`bits/sample on an average through a digital signal
`processing followed .
`
`A pre-processing circuit makes compensation for
`sub- carrier phase inversion between frames, an inter(cid:173)
`frame predictive coder removes redunduncy from the
`signal, and a variable length coder removes re(cid:173)
`dunduncy from the codes representing the prediction
`error. The compressed data are once stored in a
`
`8BIT I SAMPLE
`
`i PRE-
`
`PROCESS.
`
`INTERFRAME
`CODER
`
`VARIABLE
`LENGTH
`CODER
`
`BUFFER
`MEMORY
`
`DATA
`OUT
`
`IN
`SOUND
`
`OUT
`
`VIDEO
`OUT
`
`POST(cid:173)
`PROCESS.
`
`INTERFRAME
`DECODER
`
`VARIABLE
`LENGTH
`DECODER
`
`BUFFER
`MEMORY
`
`Fig. 1 NETEC-22H system bleak diagram.
`
`6 . 4-1
`
`VIZIO, Inc. Exhibit 1025
`3 of 7
`
`

`
`buffer memory and then transmitted through an error
`correcting coder to a line . At the decoder, the
`compressed data is decoded into the PC~1 signal
`through the reverse process, and the PCN signal is
`converted into the analog composite NTSC color
`television signal by a digital-to- analog converter .
`Since the digital processing is designed principally
`to preserve the waveform, the codec is transparent for
`the composite video signal ,
`
`Sampling fre g ~ency
`
`In the composite coding, the san:pling frequency
`must be higher than double the ~TSC television signal
`bandwidth of 4 , 2 NHz, and is cho en to be 10 . 76 MHz
`(684 fh , fh : horizontal sync frequency) in normal
`n;ode ,
`
`On the other hand, in interframe coding a sub(cid:173)
`sampling, or halving the sampling frequency, is
`usually used to avoid the buffer OYerflow when
`pictures have a large amount of motions . However,
`Lhe sub- samp l ing causes an apparent picture quality
`degradation, which vill not. be permitted in the high
`quality encoding system,
`
`In NETEC- 22H system, a sub-Nyquist encoding
`vit.h a sampling rate of 7 , 16 Hllz(·156 fb), about double
`the sub- carrier frequenc , is adopted in stead of the
`sub- sampling. Aliasing components can be removed by
`means of a comb filtering , and the picture quality
`degradations are hardly seen .
`
`Pre-processing , OTF
`
`As long as frame-to-frame prediction is limited
`to the use of only one frame delay, the sub- carrier
`chrominance component remains in the frame difference
`signal because of the sub-carrier phase difference
`of 180° between succeeding frames, Compensation
`for the phase inversion is made by first separating
`the composite signal into luminance and chrominance
`components and then inverting !.he polarily of the
`chrominance component frame by frame ,
`
`In the pre- processing circuit, the separation
`is made by an orthogonal transformation, OTF convert(cid:173)
`ing two horizontal scanning lines signal into a line
`sum end a line difference component . The line
`difference contains mainly the chrominance component,
`while the line sum contains the luminance . Figure 2
`It shoul d be noted
`shows a schematic diagram of OTF,
`that the waveform of the composite NTSC television
`signal is strictly preserved since OTF is a reversi(cid:173)
`ble processing.
`
`Predictive coding
`
`A block diagram of the interframe predictive
`coder and decoder is shown in Figure 3. The coder
`is composed of a frame - to-frame prediction loop and
`an in~rrame coder which encodes the frame difference
`signal. The in- frame coder is a higher order DPCH
`which can effectively encode simultaneous l y the
`luminance and the sub- carrier chrominance component .
`
`The prediction function is changed according
`to the operating modes as follows:
`
`(1) T mode interframe coding (normal mode):
`HO-DPCM of the frame difference (P(z)=z - 3).
`
`(a) Transmitting side
`
`±I
`
`(b) Receiving side
`
`Fig. 2 Orthogonal transformation , OTF.
`
`r-------- ------,
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`(a) Coder
`
`FRAME
`DELAY
`
`(b) Decoder
`
`(2) T mode in- frame coding (refreshing or transient
`S/T) HO-DPCM (P(z)=z- 3)
`
`Fig. 3
`
`Interframe predictive coder and decoder
`block diagram.
`
`6. 4- 2
`
`VIZIO, Inc. Exhibit 1025
`4 of 7
`
`

`
`(J) S mode in- frame coding ,
`Sub- Nyquist HO- DPCM (P(Z)=0.5z- 1+z- 2- 0 . 5z- J) .
`
`A nonlinear function NL is pl aced into the frame
`difference path, taking a key ro l e in improving the
`coding performances . The nonlinear function has an
`input-to-output relation as shown in Figure 4 . The
`transfer gain is less than unity for the small input
`amplitude and unity for the large amplitude .
`
`When the gain of the frame difference path is
`less than unity, the transfer function from the
`interframe predictive coder input to the quantizer
`has a recursive type lov pass characteristic a l ong
`the temporal axis. The lov pass filtering suppresses
`feedhacked quantization noise vhich causes unvanted
`significant picture elements even for still pictures .
`Random noise in the input signal is also suppressed
`through the temporal lov pass filtering . On the
`contrary, the temporal lov pass filtering gives rise
`to a bluring of the moving objects in the picture .
`
`The nonlinear characteristic as shown in Figure
`4 is useful because small amplitude noises on still
`part of picture are suppressed through the temporal
`lov pass filtering and large amplitude frame differ(cid:173)
`ences caused by motions are not almost affected .
`
`The nonlinear function causes a bluring of
`moving picture edges vith small brightness change .
`This effect is hardly perceived in NLl, but is
`occasionally seen in NL3.
`
`1-
`:::::>
`a...
`I(cid:173)
`~
`0
`
`INPUT
`
`Fig. 4
`
`Input-to-output characteristic of
`nonliniear function , NL .
`
`Sub-Nyquist encoding , S mode
`
`In the sub- NYquist encoding, the sampling time
`is chosen so that the sampled points in the picture
`are under an interleaving condition as shown by the
`circles in Figure 5 . At the receiving side , aliasing
`components removal is made by using a comb filtering
`as shown in Figure 5 . The samples designated by x
`are interpolated from the adjacent samples .
`
`6 . 4- 3
`
`~ ---- HP: -------
`
`~X~X--o--­
`y
`y
`
`INTERPOLATION COMB FILTER
`
`Fig. 5 Sub-Nyquist encoding , S mode .
`
`Variable length coding
`
`In the interframe predictive coding, the pre(cid:173)
`diction error is quantized and coded into 6 bits/
`sample code . The codes are transformed into reduced
`bit rate data through a variabl e length coder.
`
`The code vord length is from 1 through 12 . The
`zero amplitude representing insignificant pi cture
`element is given by the unit bit code, and significant
`pels are given by J - 12 bits code .
`
`Continuations of the insignificant picture
`element code are deleted by a block addressing. The
`picture e l ements are divided into unit block s with
`9 samples in T mode and 6 sampl es in S mode .
`If a ll
`the samples in the unit block are insignificant, the
`unit block is deleted . The positions of the deleted
`unit blocks are represented by block address codes .
`
`According to computer sjmulati on , a transmission
`bit rate corresponding to 2 bits/sampl e is possible,
`when the number of significant picture el ements is
`less than about 25 % of the vhole sampl es ,
`
`Adaptive mode control
`
`The quantizati on is made by a dead z one circuit
`followed by a quantization circuit . The dead zone
`threshold level is changed from 1 thr ough 3, and the
`quantum step size of the quantizer for small input
`is set to be 1,2 , 4 and 6 , The overall quantization
`mode is represented as QmDn in the folloving dis(cid:173)
`cussion , vhere m and n represent the quantum step
`size and the dead zone threshold level, respectively .
`The nonlinear functions of NLl, NL2 and NL3 are used ,
`
`The choise of the parameters is made depending
`on the buffer memory occupancy. As tbe buffer
`occupancy increases, the quantization parameters is
`changed from the fine to the coarse ones .
`
`VIZIO, Inc. Exhibit 1025
`5 of 7
`
`

`
`When the buffer occupancy exceeds a predetermined
`level, S mode in-frame coding operates. When back to
`T mode, T mo~e in-frame coding is made for one frame
`interval to refresh the frame memory with T mode
`sampling rate .
`
`Upon overflowing, the frame memory data is
`frozen untill the end of the frame .
`
`ENCODING PERFORMANCES
`
`Effect of OTF and NL
`
`The eff~cts of the subcarrier phase inversion by
`OTF and the nonlinear function NL are measured ex(cid:173)
`perimentally. Figure 6 shows the number of signifi(cid:173)
`cant picture elements with and without OTF and NL
`as a function of the dead zone threshold level.
`In
`this measurements, picture is a still and colorful
`one, and the quantization step size is kept minimum,
`It is seen that the number of significant picture
`elements is halved by OTF and further reduced with NL.
`The combination of OTF and NL makes
`it possible to operate under the low dead zone
`without excess generation of significant picture
`elements .
`
`-*
`
`....J w a..
`~ z
`<l
`u
`~
`
`z
`
`<.:)
`
`WITH OTF
`
`(/)
`
`00
`
`5
`4
`3
`2
`DEAD ZONE THRESHOLD
`
`6
`
`Fig. 6 Effect of OTF and NL on the number of
`significant picture elements .
`
`Input random noises produce significant picture
`elements, increasing coded data generation rate . A
`measurement is made of the coded data rate as a
`function of signal- to-added noise ratio with and
`without NL function.
`
`In this experiment, the source signal is a color
`telPvision signal taken by a TV camera with SNR of
`about 48 dB unweighted. When the quantization is
`fixed to Q2D2, the bit rate increases by about 8 and
`14 Mbit/sec for the low SNR of 40 and 35 dB, re(cid:173)
`spectively. These increases are reduced to only 2
`and 5 Mbit/sec, respectively, by applying the non(cid:173)
`linear function ~~. This indicates that possible
`operating range is extended to below 40 dB input SNR,
`covering almost all signals practically encountered.
`
`Picture quality
`
`Subjectively evaluated signal-to-noise ratio
`(SNR) are shown in Figure 7. The coding parameters
`are fixed to QlDl, Q2Dl, Q2D2, Q4D2 and Q6DJ. The
`fine solid line indicate a theoretical SNR of PCM
`with the same quantum step size as Qn .
`
`60
`
`55
`
`OlD I
`
`Q2D\
`
`50
`
`45
`
`Q4D2.
`
`Q603
`
`Fig. 7 Subjective signal-to-noise ratio.
`measured with the coding parameters
`fixed.
`
`Statistical distribution of the operating modes
`is measured for variety of television programs. The
`encoded data generation rate is greatly dependent of
`not only the amount of motions but also picture
`character. This is becuase the use of OTF produces
`line prediction error into the frame difference
`signals. Picture containing many diagonal edges give
`rise to much informations . For such signals, pro(cid:173)
`bability of Q4 - Q6 mode occurence increases and SNR
`is decreased. Al hough it is very difficult to
`represent quantitatively the performance, at present,
`roughly speaking, average SNR lies in the range of 50
`io 54 dB weighted at around 22 Mbit/s .
`
`It is confirmed that there occurs no decrease in
`spacial resolution and color fidelity is very good.
`
`CODEC HARDWARE
`
`Figure 8 shows a photograph of the coder and
`decoder of NETEC-22H system. The major specifications
`are listed in Table 1. Each bay measures 2000HX500W
`x250D, A half of the bay is occupied by the frame
`memory and buffer memory. These memories are composed
`of 4 kbi ts NOS RAM, ppD411. When a 16 kbi ts RAM or
`64 kbits CCD memory element will be available in
`the near future, the size and cost of the memories
`will be greatly reduced,
`
`6.4-4
`
`VIZIO, Inc. Exhibit 1025
`6 of 7
`
`

`
`CONCLUSION
`
`REFERENCES
`
`A composite interframe coding of NTSC color
`television signals has been developed amiog at a high
`quality transmission with a bit rate of 16-32 Mbit/sec .
`The codec is designed to preserve strictly the wave(cid:173)
`form of the composite video signal including VITS,
`providing high ~olor fidelity no decrease in reso(cid:173)
`lution and wideband (5 MHz) capability.
`The use of an orthogonal transformation for the
`sub-carrier phase inversion and a nonlinear function
`in the predictive coding loop makes it possible to
`realize the high SNR in the composite coding .
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`
`The authors would like to thank Hisashi Kaneko
`and Y. Kato for their helpful discussion and encour(cid:173)
`agement. The authors also wish to thank A. Hirano for
`computer simulation programming and Haruo Kaneko and
`M. Nishiwaki for the hardware development support.
`
`(1) B. G. Haskell, F . V. Mounts, and J. C, Candy,
`"Interframe coding of videotelephone pictures,"
`Proc. IEEE, vol . 60, pp. 792-800, July 1972.
`
`(2) K. Iinuma, Y. Iijima, T. Ishiguro, H. Kaneko, and
`S. Shigaki , "Interframe coding for 4 MHz color
`television signals," Interframe coding for 4 MHz
`color television signals," IEEE Trans , Communica(cid:173)
`tions, vol. COM- 23, pp . 1461-1466, December 1975.
`
`(3) T, Ishiguro, K. Iinuma, Y. Iijima, T. Koga, and
`H Kaneko, "NETEC system: Interframe encoder for
`NTSC color television signals," The Third Inter(cid:173)
`national Conference on Digital Satellite Communi-
`cations Record, pp.
`, November 1975.
`
`(4) B. G. Haskell, P. L. Gordon, R. L. Schmit, and
`J . V , Scattaglia, "Frame-to-frame coding of 525
`line monochrome television," 1975 IEEE National
`Telecommunications Converence Record, pp. 22-23
`22-25, December, 1975.
`
`. -----
`~ ----
`.!-::-.= ==
`I
`1
`
`1
`
`-
`
`I
`I
`
`a
`
`Fig. 8 NETEC-22H coder and decoder .
`
`Table 1
`
`NETEC-22H codec specifications
`
`Video signal input/output
`NTSC color television signal
`1 vpp/75 n unbalanced
`Sound signal input/output
`~lono/stereo sound program
`12 dBm maximum/600 n balanced
`Video A/D and D/A conversion
`Signal bandwidth: 5 MHz
`Sampling frequency: 10.76/14.35 MHz
`Number of bits: 8(A/D), 9(D/A)
`Sound A/D and D/A conversion
`Signal bandwidth: 15 kllz
`Sampling frequency: 31. 5 kllz
`11 bits nonlinear coding
`Error correcting codec
`239/255 double error correcting BCH code
`
`Transmission bit rate
`16 - 32 Mbit/s continuously variable
`Power supply
`-4~ V DC , about 600 watts each .
`
`6.4-5
`
`VIZIO, Inc. Exhibit 1025
`7 of 7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket