throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`VALVE CORPORATION
`
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2017-00136 (Patent 8,641,525 82)
`
`IPR2017—00137 (Patent 9,089,770 B2)
`
`DECLARATION OF BRUCE RUBINGER
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 1
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 1
`
`

`

`1, Bruce Rubinger, declare and state as follows:
`
`lPR2017-00136 for US. Patent 8,641,525
`
`IPR2017—00137 for US. Patent 9,089,770
`
`1.
`
`I have been retained by Ironburg Inventions Ltd. (“Patent Owner”) to
`
`consider where a skilled searcher conducting a diligent prior art search (for U.S
`
`Patent 8,641,525 (“the 525 Patent”) and U.S Patent 9,089,770 (“the 770 Patent”))
`
`reasonably could have been expected to discover US. Patent No. 6,3 62,8 13 by
`
`worn.
`
`2.
`
`l have personal knowledge of the facts and opinions stated in this
`
`Declaration, and am competent to testify thereto.
`
`3.
`
`I am the Managing Director and founder of Global Prior Art (GPA), founded
`
`in 1982, and created GPA's comprehensive worldwide search process, which is
`
`known for its broad international coverage and manual review of critical sources.
`
`GPA is composed of over 40 full-time searchers in the fields of mechanical
`
`engineering, software and e-commerce, electronics and semiconductors,
`
`telecommunications and networking, biotechnology, chemistry and materials,
`
`medical devices and pharmaceuticals. Our range of services covers a broad
`
`spectrum from prior art searching in support of litigation and IP due diligence to IP
`
`Landscape analysis for competitive intelligence and developing market entrance
`
`strategies. We also specialize in developing cost effective and comprehensive
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 2
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 2
`
`

`

`IPR2017—00136 for U.S. Patent 8,641,525
`
`IPR2017-00137 for U.S. Patent 9,089,770
`
`product clearance or Freedom-to-Operate searches to ensure that our clients are
`
`proactively aware of all potential infringement threats.
`
`4.
`
`My background is a blend of technology and the science of decision-making.
`
`I hold a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and PhD. in systems science from the Polytechnic
`
`Institute of Brooklyn. My dissertation was entitled “System Identification via Non-
`
`Linear Filtering,” which addressed non-linear filtering and its application to
`
`prediction and estimation. I began my career with Hughes Aircraft where I was
`
`involved in digital signal processing. I was awarded a NASA fellowship and am a
`
`member of Eta Kappa Nu and the honorary research society Sigma Xi. Since 2009,
`
`I have been recognized in IAM 300 — The World’s Leading IP Strategists.
`
`5.
`
`I am being compensated at my standard rate of $150/hour. My
`
`compensation is not contingent upon the substance of my declaration, any
`
`statements or opinions made, or the outcome of this matter.
`
`6.
`
`I have reviewed the references and classifications identified in the ‘525 and
`
`the ‘770 patent. In my opinion, a skilled searcher would have reasonably relied
`
`upon the classes and sub—classes of the prior art that the examiner cited during the
`
`examination. This is true because the examiners are experts in their assigned
`
`technical areas and experts in identifying relevant prior art. Based on my review of
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 3
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00136 for US. Patent 8,641,525
`
`IPR2017—00137 for US. Patent 9,089,770
`
`the ‘525 patent, the examiner identified references in the following classes and
`
`sub—classes summarized in the table below:
`
`USP Class
`
`# References Cited Most Cited Sub-Class
`
`
`
`Other Sub-Classes
`
`
`
`(# instances)
`
`463
`40
`37 (22)
`31, 36, 38, 39, 49,56
`
`
`345
`6
`
`
`169(3)
`
`156,157
`
`
`
`20, 22
`
`127, 152
`
`
`
`
`
`341
`
`702
`
`2
`
`2
`
`400
`273
`
`1
`l_ 1
`
`472
`148
`
`N/A
`N/A
`
`‘
`l
`
`7.
`
`As can be seen, there only are six different classes that appear in the list,
`
`with the two primary classes/sub—classes being 463/37 and class 345/169. A skilled
`
`searcher conducting a reasonable prior art search would have, at a minimum,
`
`searched within these classes/sub—classes and identified the Wtirn reference within
`
`the second primary class/sub—class (345/169).
`
`8.
`
`worn is in one ofthe primary classes/sub-classes (345/169). Given that the
`
`examiner cited numerous references in the 345/ 169 class/sub-class, a skilled
`
`searcher would have conducted a search in this particular class/sub—class by hand
`
`and with keyword searches.
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 4
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 4
`
`

`

`lPR2017—00136 for US. Patent 8,641,525
`
`1PR2017—00137 for US. Patent 9,089,770
`
`9.
`
`I have reviewed the declaration of Reynaldo C. Barcello (Ex.1012) and the
`
`accompanying appendices.
`
`10.
`
`The class/sub-class 345/169 contains roughly 2,700 patent documents
`
`disclosed before the prior art date ofthe ‘525 patent (June 17, 2011). In my
`
`opinion, a skilled searcher would have searched this class/sub-class by hand and by
`
`using keyword combinations similar to those found in Appendices A and B of the
`
`Barcello declaration (EX. 1012). For example, the following string, when
`
`performed using Derwent Innovation, a database typically used by me and other
`
`skilled searchers, produces only 49 results and includes the worn reference:
`
`“(re1note* OR controlle1'*) AND (middle finger) AND ((button* OR push* OR
`
`depres* OR switch*) SAME (back* OR under* OR behind OR rear* OR
`
`posterior*)).” These search terms are used, for example, in Landon IP’s search
`
`strings 21 and 54.
`
`1 1.
`
`Based on my review of the patent, and my statements above, it is my opinion
`
`that a skilled searcher would have identified the classes/sub—classes of the prior art
`
`cited by the examiner and would have reasonably been expected to discover US.
`
`Patent No. 6,362,813 by worn either by hand or by using keyword search strings.
`
`12.
`
`I declare under penalty of the laws of the United States that all statements
`
`made herein of my own knowledge are true and correct, and that all statements
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 5
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 5
`
`

`

`1PR2017-00136 for US. Patent 8,641,525
`
`1PR2017-00137 for US. Patent 9,089,770
`
`made on information and belief are believed to be true; and further that these
`
`statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements and the
`
`likes so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001
`
`of Title 18 ofthe United States Code.
`
`13.
`
`In signing this declaration, I recognize that the declaration will be filed as
`
`evidence in a contested case before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`Executed this 13th day of October, 2017, at Boston, MA.
`
`
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 6
`
`IRONBURG EX2034, Page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket